ArticlePDF Available

Who is Happy in Doctoral Programs: The Connection between Employment and Learning Outcomes of PhD Students

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Doctoral education in Rus-sia has high dropout rates. Many experts have attributed this to the generally low amounts of financial aid afforded to PhD students, which prompts them to seek out employment while pursuing a doctorate. However, current discussion is largely anecdotal in nature as it is mostly based on expert conjectures that only reflect limited statistics or rather cursory evidence from individual cases. Drawing upon findings from a 2016 survey of PhD students at leading Russian universities , we assess the extent and types of employment of postgraduates, as well as the experiences of those PhD students who balance work and study and the main challenges that confront them. We explore how such factors as one's area of employment, the type of contract worked, and the nature of the job performed affect how PhD hopefuls conceive of the educational process alongside their specific learning outcomes and career prospects. We conclude that balancing work and study can benefit both the academic performance and professional experiences of PhD students, but only insofar as the topic of one's PhD thesis research is closely aligned with what they do in the workplace. The results of the study can be used when developing measures to reform doctoral education both at the institutional and nation-state levels. Doctoral education in Russia has high dropout rates: Only about 60% of PhD students complete their track and only 13% defend their thesis during the expected period of study1. These levels are compara
Content may be subject to copyright.
Voprosy obrazovaniya / Educational Studies Moscow. 2019. No 1. P. 87–108
Who is Happy in Doctoral
Programs:
The Connection between Employment and
Learning Outcomes of PhD Students
S. Bekova, Z. Dzhafarova
1 http://www.gks.ru/free_

Saule Bekova
  -


  
 


Zibeyda Dzhafarova
  -
   -
 
  
 
 -

Abstract.  -

  

  
  -
 
   -

  -
-
  
 -


  

  -
 


   -
  -
  -

   -
 -
   


 
  
-

Keywords: doctoral education in Rus-
sia, PhD students, employment, dropout
rate, balancing work and study.
DOI:

 -
sis during the expected period of study
1
. These levels are compara-
Received in
May 2018
Translated from Russian
by I. Zhuchkova.
http://vo.hse.ru/en/
S. Bekova, Z. Dzhafarova
Who is Happy in Doctoral Programs
ble with data recorded in a number of other nations. For example, the


  -
ly sets these countries apart from Russia is that they have increas-
 
-
ies on the subject in Russia, so that the conceptions and judgements
 -
cation in this country have this far basically resided on expert conjec-
tures rather than hard fact.
It is frequently the case for the public discourse to point out the
need to juggle work and study as a major factor that harms the com-


assumed correlation between a student’s employment and wheth-

true insofar as a success with a doctorate inevitably implies ploughing
 
a thesis to complete the degree, while how much public scholarship
is paid to Russian PhD students is reported to never exceed the min-
imum subsistence level in the country2. Furthermore, we should fac-
tor in that the vast majority of doctoral programs in Russia are full-time.

income and does not need to provide for themselves, a PhD student
  
work and study may arise.
 -
ment and dropout rates in programs of doctoral education seems to
be obvious enough to be taken for granted, it does not always hold
  
 
week to be able to successfully handle their doctoral thesis research.
This may be viewed as evidence to further attest to the Warren the-
   
labor becomes a factor material for the student’s doctoral perfor-
mance only insofar as it transpires in conjunction with one’s gener-
 -
ings for the link between working while studying for a PhD degree and
 
shown that doctoral hopefuls who dropped out from the track would
typically indicate combining work and study as a factor that preclud-
ed their academic success, whereas those informants who made it

2 , http
Voprosy obrazovaniya / Educational Studies Moscow. 2019. No 1. P. 87–108
THEORETICAL AND APPLIED RESEARCH
their progress with the doctorate. The authors point out that it is fair-

  -
posures to underpin the theoretical groundwork they build while do-
  
should note that a comparison of systems of doctoral education in

overall organization of training, available public scholarships and oth-

From what Russia’s rather scarce body of research on the subject


proportion of PhD students choose to work while pursuing their de-

no studies to thoroughly look into how the factors of where Russian
doctoral students are employed, what exactly they do for a living and
 -
ences and learning outcomes. Exploring these correlations is specif-
ically relevant given the changes that doctoral schools in Russia and
elsewhere across the globe have seen in terms of how PhD programs
are structured and delivered, where more emphasis is placed on both
the quality of independent research and how well one is able to mas-
ter individual assignments, modules and dimensions of the mandato-


  -
dents enrolled in PhD programs at leading Russian universities to
gauge the extent to which they combine work and study as well as
-
   
their experience in a doctoral track.
-
 -
ademic Excellence Project and two more are federal universities) that
    
the survey, which translates into about a quarter of all doctoral enroll-



remark on the limitations of this study that must be considered while

Our survey was limited solely to the stated cohort of students who
at the time of this survey were enrolled in PhD programs at leading
1. Data sources
2. Limitations
http://vo.hse.ru/en/
S. Bekova, Z. Dzhafarova
Who is Happy in Doctoral Programs
Russian universities, as detailed in Section One above. Postgraduates
at any other higher education institutions were beyond the scope of
-

Our study was framed as a one-time survey among PhD students
across certain leading Russian universities. The respondents were
asked for their motives to enter a doctoral program, a posteriori, and
how they conceived of their prospective PhD defense and employ-
ment plans, a priori. It should be noted that the sourced recollections
and anticipations of life events are evaluative in nature and therefore
  
were impossible to be obtained given the design framework chosen
for this study. Carrying out a longitudinal panel could provide more
plausible and representative results.
   
been designed, we believe that the data we have obtained about stu-
dents’ plans for PhD defense are reliable and suitable for making rea-
  
some of the respondents who at the time of this study were in senior
years of their doctoral training already completed their programs by
the moment this paper was being drafted. Insofar as there were per-
sonal survey links available, this has allowed us to supplement the
data sourced for PhD students at one of the participating universi-
ties by factual information about what academic outcomes they ul-

The main characteristics of the PhD student sample
Item
Sample
split,%
Year of study
First 39
Second 32
Third 20
Fourth 9
Major
Mathematics and Science 30
Humanities 9
Engineering and Technology 30
Social Sciences 26
Education and Pedagogy 4
Item
Sample
split,%
Gender
Male 55
Female 45
Mode of study
Full-time 88
Part-time 12
Mode of funding
Public scholarship 85
Tuition-paying 15
Voprosy obrazovaniya / Educational Studies Moscow. 2019. No 1. P. 87–108
THEORETICAL AND APPLIED RESEARCH

university database, which limits our ability to come up with fully jus-
   -
it a correlation between one’s reported plans regarding PhD defense
and whether they have actually made it to the PhD hooding: There

those who previously indicated they were inclined to go for PhD de-
 2p 
enables us to assume that the data we have obtained on whether and
when one is looking to defend their PhD thesis can be reasonably
deemed as valid and suitable to plausibly judge about the outcomes
of doctoral training.
-
al students are employed. The most common mode of employment


Those who are employed at the higher education institution ()
    
-
ing) as well as administrative positions (about a quarter of the inform-
ants)3. We have found the nature of the work that one is into to exhibit
-


   -

 -
trative positions.
Of the PhD students who are employed outside their university,
the largest share hold non-academic positions with corporate enti-

research jobs outside the academia.
In the course of our study, we found the status/type of employ-
ment to be correlated with a number of socio-demographic attributes

In what follows, we focus on how factors of employment of PhD
students are related to their choices and experiences along the
course of doctoral study, from the moment they enter a PhD program
and through how they conceive of their prospects for thesis defense
and future career.
3 

3. Results
Figure. The PhD student sample broken down by
type of employment (%)
Full-time job off-campus
Full-time job on-campus
More than one job
Unemployed
Part-time job on-campus
Part-time job off-campus
Temp work
33,6
17,1
16,6
10,1
8,6
7, 2
6,8
http://vo.hse.ru/en/
S. Bekova, Z. Dzhafarova
Who is Happy in Doctoral Programs
Our survey has found that a major proportion of PhD students choose
to stay at their alma mater as they decide to continue into doctoral ed-

of academic inbreeding, which is a practice whereby graduates are re-

3.1. Entering
a PhD program
Figure. The PhD student sample broken down by
type of employment (%)
Full-time job off-campus
Full-time job on-campus
More than one job
Unemployed
Part-time job on-campus
Part-time job off-campus
Temp work
33,6
17,1
16,6
10,1
8,6
7, 2
6,8
How socio-demographic features of the PhD student sample
are related to the type of employment
Full-time job
on-campus
Full-time job
off-campus
Part-time job
on-campus Temp work
More than
one job Unemployed
Major 36%
Engineering
22%
Math
46%
Math
17%
Engineering
43%
Engineering
18%
Engineering
22%
Social
36%
Social
24% Engi-
neering
32% Social 15%
Social
17%
Humanities
16%
Social
4%
Humanities
Gender 55% Female 68% Male
Income level 30% Low 50% Low 47% Low
70% high 50% High 53% High
Year of study 33% First 49% First 34% First 46% First
3% Fourth 24% Third
Mode of study 21% Part-time
Mode of funding 92%
State-funded
76%
State-funded
93%
State-funded
90%
State-funded
Note: The table provides only statistically signicant correlations, where a positive correlation is shad-
ed and a negative correlation is no shaded.
Voprosy obrazovaniya / Educational Studies Moscow. 2019. No 1. P. 87–108
THEORETICAL AND APPLIED RESEARCH
employment at the university where they earned their undergraduate

When we analyze how the rates of inbreeding are distributed across
our sample of PhD students as related to their status/type of employ-

inbred doctoral students among those who are employed at the uni-
-
ed that they completed their previous degree at another . Of those
who at the time of the survey were solely into their doctoral studies and
had no employment, the proportion of inbound students was more

working at the university. Finally, among those who indicated that they
were employed outside the university, about slightly less than a quarter
-
ent . The correlation between the rates of inbred students among
doctoral pursuers and their status/type of employment is likely to be
shaped by various factors including, inter alia: whether there are any
barriers confronting those non-alumni who seek out employment at

    
they have chosen to continue into doctoral training at their alma mater

one thing, there is reason to expect doctoral inbreds to enjoy exten-
sive social and professional contacts at their alma mater, so that they
are arguably better informed about their academic environment, job
opportunities, etc., which should all bolster their chance of securing

-
  -
vor hiring among its own graduates as a vehicle whereby recruitment
challenges and risks can be alleviated, which in turn restrains employ-
ment opportunities for inbound doctoral corps.

PhD students to land a position at the  they are enrolled in, doctor-
al pursuers may choose to take up a job outside the university as feel-
ing more inclined for a non-academic career. We can obtain a glimpse
of how students’ professional aspirations are shaped by looking at
their motives for entering a program of doctoral education. Figure
   
-
dents chose to go for a doctorate and their status/type of employment.
-
-
ing an academic career as the main reason why they chose to study for
-
toral degree mostly as an added asset to help leverage their career in
a non-academic environment, there is a substantially greater propor-
tion of PhD students working outside the university.
http://vo.hse.ru/en/
S. Bekova, Z. Dzhafarova
Who is Happy in Doctoral Programs

that resulted from analyzing what essentially propelled the students to
pursue a doctoral degree and how these motivations are linked with
their status/type of employment and conceptions about future career.
The vast majority of Russian PhD students opt to study for doctoral
credentials at the  where they completed their previous degree.
 
and study at the same university, and these students report they are

doctoral pursuers who are the university’s alumni and those who hold
 
go for a doctorate and the type of employment they have may speak
to various entry barriers facing inbound student corps, the overall low
rates of mobility and a hierarchical nature of the Russian academic
environment.
Russian doctoral schools have been actively transitioning to a mod-
el where much more weight is attached to how a candidate performs
across various study modules and dimensions of the core course-


diligence to handle the program as the role and scope of curriculum
 
  
PhD environment where one is required to successfully juggle more
in-person course load as well as their commitments for independent
thesis research, writing papers, presenting at conferences, etc. Let us
now take a closer look at how students’ experiences of progressing
along the PhD course of study under these new and often more de-
manding academic conditions are linked with their employment.
3.2. Studying
for PhD degree
Figure. How student motivations to pursue a doctorate are related
to the type of employment (%)
Education will help in a recearcher
career development at a univercity
or recearch institute
Education will help in a professor
career development in a univercity
or recearch institute
Postgraduate study will help in my
career development outside the
academic sphere
Education will help in a professor
career development in a
commercial organisation
68
48
51
50
42
50
28
43
30
22
30
25
At univercity
Outside the
univercity
Unemployed
Voprosy obrazovaniya / Educational Studies Moscow. 2019. No 1. P. 87–108
THEORETICAL AND APPLIED RESEARCH


  -
    -
 
   
2
p    
  -
lum, of whom those who were employed full-time outside the universi-
2p

work and doctoral pursuit exhibits a correlation with to what extent the
area and exact topic of their thesis project are in sync with the nature
of their job. We have found those students whose work is barely re-
lated in its nature to the subject of their PhD research to be more fre-
quent to report they were literally struggling to co-handle their work-
place duties and doing a doctorate. Of this cohort, the PhD students
who at the time of the survey were employed outside the university

2p
2p
     at which they
are enrolled in a PhD program, it was primarily the holders of positions
in administrative support and instruction who reported they were sore-
ly lacking time and personal resource to manage it through their doc-
-
2p
have noted only a scarce connection between what they do in the
workplace and the topic they are researching into, while the proportion
of those reporting so among their peers who are university instructors
2p

have indicated that the subject of their PhD thesis is directly related to
the nature of their work. Of the cohort of PhD pursuers who work and
study at the same university, the share of those who found themselves
 
2p
2p

2
p

Our analysis has found that those PhD students who pursue em-
ployment outside the  where they study for a doctorate are like-
ly to be confronted with even more acute challenges of successful-
2
p -
ject had almost nothing to do with their work. Those who are con-
http://vo.hse.ru/en/
S. Bekova, Z. Dzhafarova
Who is Happy in Doctoral Programs
  
nature or alike were the most inclined to report a very poor connec-
tion between what they were doing for a living and what they were re-
  2  p-

who found themselves into major problems co-handling their work
and study among those who at the time of the survey were employed

the 2 p-
fuls who are employed at their university

are holders of research-centric positions
are less vulnerable to pres-
sures of combining work and academics than their peers who pursue
careers outside their university.
The respondents who study for a PhD and pursue a job at the same
university are likely to report more positive experiences and assess-
ments of their doctoral education. There was a greater proportion of

 where they
2p-
ing experience as of utility in their job.
-

of the survey did not have permanent employment were the most like-
-
as their peers who worked full-time outside the university were the

2
p
sub-group, the majority have responded that the salary they received
under their full-time contract accounted for the bulk in their total earn-
ings, while the remainder of the sample would most typically report a
 
    
more than one source of income would still note that they found them-


   -
it often to the detriment of how well they are able to handle their PhD
curriculum. Contrariwise, those students who work at the universi-
 -
-
nancial pressure.

student to interact with their supervisor is another important dimen-
sion in exploring the learning experiences and outcomes of doctoral
pursuers. Despite the aforementioned departure of modern doctoral
programs from the supervision-centric model, we can still hardly over-
estimate the role that the academic supervisor plays in steering a can-
didate toward a PhD degree. There have been multiple studies to sug-
Voprosy obrazovaniya / Educational Studies Moscow. 2019. No 1. P. 87–108
THEORETICAL AND APPLIED RESEARCH

-
 
  
only that the PhD supervisor guides a hopeful along the research and
thesis writing process, but he or she also plays a pivotal role in facili-
tating important networking conduits whereby the doctoral candidate
gradually becomes an integral part of the ’s academic environ-

   -
tions with the academic supervisor on topics pertinent to their thesis
research at least once a month. Those who work and study for a doc-
torate at the same university have reported they typically had aca-
Figure. Main sources of income by type of employment (%)
Full-time job on-campus
Full-time job off-campus
Part-time job on-campus
Part-time job off-campus
Temp work
More than one job
Unemployed
93
68
12
22
14
98
40
3
15
4
79
84
12
40
21
88
67
3
29
11
44
68
4
60
10
89
66
11
22
19
0
71
8
54
8
Salary
State stipend
Other stipends
Family’s earnings
or savings
Grants
http://vo.hse.ru/en/
S. Bekova, Z. Dzhafarova
Who is Happy in Doctoral Programs
-
more, nine in every ten doctoral students who worked at the university

on topics other than those directly related to the PhD project, where-
as the share of students who reported so among the sub-group of
doctoral pursuers employed outside the university was only rough-
ly half as large.
Provided that holding regular consultations with the academic su-
-
ish line, there is reason to assume that students who fall short of op-
portunity to interact with their PhD project lead may be exposed to
greater risks of academic failure.
Within the framework of this study, we have considered students’
plans regarding PhD thesis defense and how they conceive of their
   
academic work and any challenges likely to confront them in build-


they expected to defend their doctoral thesis within the policy term of
study or within a timeframe of up to one year following the comple-

 
    
half of the students who at the time of the survey had no employment
and were entirely focused on their PhD pursuit have indicated that they
expected to proceed to their thesis defense within the regular term of
3.3. Outcomes
of PhD education
3.3.1. Prospects for
thesis defense
Figure. How frequently PhD students with different types of
employment are able to interact with their academic supervisor (%)
On-campus
Off-campus
Unemployed
39
23
19
12
6
24
24
25
16
11
33
24
21
11
10
Few times a week
Once a week
2-3 times
a month
Once a month
Less than once
a month
Voprosy obrazovaniya / Educational Studies Moscow. 2019. No 1. P. 87–108
THEORETICAL AND APPLIED RESEARCH
study. Insofar as PhD freshmen account for as much as almost half
    
with any kind of employment, it is perhaps no surprise that more op-
timistic perceptions about the likely timing of their doctoral defense


expect to take their PhD defense.
Those PhD hopefuls who at the time of the survey were employed
at the university have indicated that they were going to take a doctor-
al defense a year after completion of study or later. This assessment

this sub-group are involved in their academic environment.
  -
tion of those to report that they were uncertain of whether they would
be able to make it to the PhD defense or that they were not going to
  -
tract outside the university were by a wide margin the most likely to

  

on the survey questionnaire, students are willy-nilly exposed to signif-
-
gree the results that we are able to obtain. Since the student is in fact
prompted to admit their academic failure when he or she chooses to
-
son to deem the resulting indication for how many students of the en-
tire sample will ultimately fail to make it to the PhD defense to be bi-
Figure. When PhD students in different years of study expect to
proceed to thesis defense
55
1
4
6
41
7
8
51
46 As scheduled + 1
More than 1 year after graduation
Not sure not going to defend
As scheduled
Before graduation
1 2 3 Year of study
32
11
36
6
http://vo.hse.ru/en/
S. Bekova, Z. Dzhafarova
Who is Happy in Doctoral Programs
ased downwards. These considerations also suggest that working a
full-time contract outside the university while studying for a doctorate
is a factor that can materially harm one’s prospects for PhD success.
The career path that a student is looking to embark on after com-
pleting their PhD credentials is an important aspect of exploring the
learning experiences and outcomes of doctoral students. When a PhD
graduate is found to be disposed to continue into academic work, this
 -
tion insofar as one of its main institutional and economic goals, which
   
 -
ate may be also considered as a period when one’s professional con-
 
take this angle of view, we can note that the vast heterogeneity in pro-
spective career choices of doctoral students may be an indication that
the essential imperatives and the content of PhD education need to
be revised in many cases.
Where PhD students work while studying for doctoral credentials
   -
reer plans. Those students who at the time of the survey had full-time
or part-time employment at the university have been found to be the
most inclined for a future career in academia. Overall, among the en-
    
have reported that they would like to continue into a university career
after the PhD hooding, irrespective of their type/status of employment


with employment outside the university, there was a much lower share
of those to indicate intent for taking up an academic career. This ob-
-
ered when analyzing students’ motivations for enrolling in a doctoral
course: There was a substantially greater proportion of PhD pursuers
employed outside academia than of their counterparts working at the
university to report that they viewed a doctoral degree as primarily an
added asset to bolster their prospects for a good job in a non-aca-

of the survey were employed outside the university have indicated
no plans of seeking out academic employment at any time in future.
Of this sub-cohort, those who worked a full-time contract have been


What exactly a PhD student does for a living (i. e., the nature of the
job that one performs while pursuing a doctorate) is yet another fac-
tor that plays a major part in shaping orientations for a future career.
The vast bulk of PhD hopefuls who at the time of the survey worked at
the  where they were studying for a doctorate have expressed no
3.3.2. Career prefer-
ences
Voprosy obrazovaniya / Educational Studies Moscow. 2019. No 1. P. 87–108
THEORETICAL AND APPLIED RESEARCH
plans of changing their employer after they complete their program

 

-
uted depending on the nature of the job one is into while studying for
a PhD is arguably attributable to the fact that those students who are
holders of research positions may opt to continue their career in R&D
along a relatively wide spectrum of pathways with either another insti-
tution, a business organization, etc.
-
vey were holders of instructional positions at the university have indi-
Figure. How students’ career preferences are distributed
depending on the type/status of employment
Empoyed at univercity
Unemployed
Empoyed outside the univercity
84,7
75,3
67,0
15,3
I want to work
at univercity
I do not want
to work
at univercity
24,7
33,0
Figure. How students’ career preferences are distributed
depending on the type of employment and contract worked
Full-time at univercity
Full-time outside the univercity
74
37
26
I want to build an
academic career
I want to build an
non-academic career
63
Figure 8. How career preferences of the students that are
employed at the university are distributed depending on
the nature of their job
Research staff
Teaching staff
Administrative staff
OtherRecearcher
at commercial
organisation
Teacher at
univercity
Non-recearch
position
outside the
univercity
Recearcher
at scientifi c
organisation
Recearcher
at univercity
31 30 13 9 411
13 10 18 45 8 5
13 10 21 41 10 5
http://vo.hse.ru/en/
S. Bekova, Z. Dzhafarova
Who is Happy in Doctoral Programs
cated that they were likely to stay in teaching upon completing their

  
  
up a research career at the  where they were enrolled in a PhD
program.
There was a greater percentage of PhD students among those into
instruction or administrative support than among their peers who at
the time of the survey were holders of research positions to indicate
that they may be quitting the university following their PhD defense to

Thus, our analysis has revealed the following patterns in how the
reported career preferences are distributed among the PhD students
employed at the university depending on what kind of job they were
into while pursuing a doctorate. For one thing, those working in re-
search positions have exhibited strong determination to continue their
   

 
to be generally inclined to continue working at the university, however
many of them would like to change what exactly they do in the work-
place.
Those PhD students who at the time of the survey were employed
outside the university have mostly reported that they were unlikely
to change their sector of employment or the nature of the work per-

Figure. How career preferences of the students working outside the university are
distributed depending on the type of employment and the nature of the job performed
Non-recearch
position in
non-academic
sphere
Recearch activities
in non-academic
sphere
Recearch activities
in academic sphere
Teaching
Teacher at other univercity
Teacher at other educational organisation
Freelance
In the public administration
At commercial organisation (non-recearch pos.)
Recearcher at other univercity
Recearcher at commercial organisation
Recearcher at scientifi c organisation
Employment
preferences
54 27 5
320
3512
724
5519
1014
2451
168
14
2552
3419
18 6
15
67
71
11
10
619
6
Voprosy obrazovaniya / Educational Studies Moscow. 2019. No 1. P. 87–108
THEORETICAL AND APPLIED RESEARCH
Finally, those PhD students who at the time of the survey were
contingent employees doing casual jobs or had no employment have


2p
yet settled upon their career path, which, in their opinion, represented
a serious challenge. For comparison, the PhD students who worked
a full-time contract either at or outside the university were by a signif-
 

career. This may suggest that what the PhD students in this latter sub-
group have opted to do for a living during the term of their doctoral
pursuit can be viewed as a conscious choice that is largely in line with
the professional conceptions and mindsets that they have developed.
Thus, we can conclude that those students who choose to work
while being enrolled in a program of doctoral education are likely to

the cohorts of PhD hopefuls who are employed at and outside the uni-
versity tend to report starkly polarized career plans.
  
combine study with work
 -
  -
tions of the study process and their career plans.

postgraduates’ career prospects. There are more PhD students pur-
suing an academic career among those who have a full or part time
job at a university. These students’ initial motivation for postgradu-
-

might indicate the doctoral education in Russia at its current state bet-
ter corresponds to the interest of academically oriented postgradu-
ates, since the doctoral education is still perceived as a place to train
   
education and its focus on academically oriented postgraduates can
-

-
ited academic labor market which should inevitably push out special-
ists with a PhD degree to other markets. Researches have shown that
the distribution of postgraduates between academic and non-aca-
 -
  -


4. Discussion
http://vo.hse.ru/en/
S. Bekova, Z. Dzhafarova
Who is Happy in Doctoral Programs

employment outside the university often prevails. To illustrate, among

half whose initial motivation for a postgraduate study was to work in a
  -
ademic career is not a priority for graduates with a doctorate in Engi-
neering and exact sciences in the -
uates are employed in permanent positions in academia [Lee et al.
   

Social Sciences doctoral graduates at one university are employed in
the non-academic sphere.
On one hand, the predominant employment of postgraduates out-
-
 
is a PhD degree necessary
  
  -
ate employment challenges the value of doctoral education in its cur-
rent state. Does the doctoral education really provide the unique skills
necessary for research jobs outside the academic sphere or does
the PhD degree rather have a symbolic value for its holders and rep-
   -
graduate education towards careers in academia is reasonable only
if it corresponds to the labor market demand. If there are more grad-

some of PhD students initially intend to pursue a non-academic ca-
reer, it may be worth revising the postgraduate training system, tak-
ing into account the global trend of expanding career opportunities
for PhD graduates.
The doctoral study is the most comfortable for full-time universi-
ty employees. Regardless of their overall workload, they do not con-
sider as a challenge neither the need to combine work and study, nor
the study load, nor the forthcoming employment. This group of re-
spondents continued to study at the same university where they ob-
tained their previous level of education and they not consider other
-
cording our research, the percentage of academic inbreds is higher
among those employed at university and they do not intend to change
the place of employment after graduation. The closed nature of doc-
toral education conditioned by the low academic mobility and hierar-
chical structure of academic society in Russia becomes apparent al-
ready during the study period. The consequences of inbreeding are
-
 
  

they are more focused on communication within the university which
Voprosy obrazovaniya / Educational Studies Moscow. 2019. No 1. P. 87–108
THEORETICAL AND APPLIED RESEARCH
 
negative consequences go beyond personal and institutional losses
and reach the national level. Of course, the presence of academical-
ly oriented postgraduates who successfully combine study with full-
   -
tional structure can be considered as strength of doctoral education,

The most common type of postgraduate’s employment is full-time
work outside the university. Usually there is little connection between

doctoral education outcomes. This group of postgraduates report dif-

pursue a non-academic career.
  
   -
ademic success (usually measured by the fact of thesis defense or

postgraduates who receive full funding or are employed as research
fellows generally complete doctoral programs more often. They also
receive the degree faster in comparison to those who do not have
-
 
 -
    -
ation when a postgraduate works and studies at the same institution.
 -
pus jobs are less involved in the life of their departments and are less
likely to become a part of the research and teaching team as com-
        

employed full time outside the university are the most at risk. Univer-
sities usually lose this group of students, as they are already less fo-
cused on studying than on theirs job, planning to work in a non-aca-
demic sphere, less involved in the education process, experiencing
    
not planning to defend their thesis among this group. Of course, the
cross-sectional study design limits the use of the data, which could
be solved by using long-term studies showing the connection of type
 
-
-
   
existing data analysis.
Of course, the mode of funding is a complex characteristic that

of training or academic motivation. In any case, the absence or insuf-
  -
http://vo.hse.ru/en/
S. Bekova, Z. Dzhafarova
Who is Happy in Doctoral Programs
-
side the university, when his or her work duties do not correspond to
the thesis topic. The survey was conducted at the leading Russian
  
  -
culties here, then the scale of this problem in other universities may
be even greater.
-
   Research in Higher Educa-
tion

   Doctoral Programs.
International Journal of Doctoral Studies

      -
Asia Pacic Education Review
pp.

    
 Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and
Research      
, pp.


-
Research in High-
er Education

    
-
-
Journal University Management: Practice
and Analysis

         
  Soci-
ological Journal, 

-
   Studies in Higher Education 



Higher Education in Russia

-
   
Vestnik of Lobachevsky University of Nizhni Novgorod, 



-
Sovremennaya analitika obrazovaniya, -

-
  AARE Annual Conference (Melbourne),
https://www.researchgate.net/pb-
s_of_PhD_
 



-
References
Voprosy obrazovaniya / Educational Studies Moscow. 2019. No 1. P. 87–108
THEORETICAL AND APPLIED RESEARCH
tors. Higher Education


 -
The Jour-
nal of Human Resources

    -
  -
  
Pedagogical Education in Russia

   
-
ble at: https://papers.ss-

-
gree Progress. The Journal of Higher Education

Learning Experiences that Make a Difference:
Findings from a National Study of Doctoral Education in the Professions. Pa-
per presented at 
Studies in Higher
Education

-
Wenner Gren International Series


-
uates from a Research Policy
pp.


Practice. New Directions for Institutional Research

Leaving the Ivory Tower: The Causes and Consequences of
Departure from Doctoral Study

Higher Education
pp.

           -
Education for Chemical Engineers


during the Ph D. Research Policy


     
    
   Dissertation Abstracts Inter-
national
     
     Quality in
Postgraduate Research: Knowledge Creation in Testing Times
, pp.

   
     
School
Journal University Management: Prac-
tice and Analysis, 

 

 Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 
pp.


American Economic Review

http://vo.hse.ru/en/
S. Bekova, Z. Dzhafarova
Who is Happy in Doctoral Programs
 -
    
Studies in Higher Educa-
tion

   -
Youth & So-
ciety

  
-
 Journal Univer-
sity Management: Practice and Analysis, 

    

Journal of Further and Higher Education

... Recent studies have also confirmed that employment is a crucial element that influences PhD completion. Several researchers have established a link between the employment of PhD students and PhD completion (Bekova, 2019;Sverdlike, 2018;Wollast, 2019). Employment is one of the most widely accepted reasons for PhD attrition. ...
... A crucial element that influences the completion of a PhD is employment. Several researchers have demonstrated a link between PhD completion and the employment of PhD students (Bekova, 2019;Sverdlike, 2018;Wollast, 2019). Employment is now a widely accepted reason for such an attrition. ...
... Employment is now a widely accepted reason for such an attrition. Owing to a shortage of funding, some doctoral students are forced to work full-or part-time (Bekova & Dzhafarova, 2019). In her subsequent research, Bekova (2021) covered the connection between getting a job and finishing a PhD. ...
Article
This paper explores the experiences of Pakistani PhD scholars while focusing the role of personal characteristics in PhD completion. This study draws on in-depth interviews with PhD enrolled scholars across four Pakistani universities-Quaid-I-Azam University Islamabad, International Islamic University Islamabad, The University of the Punjab Lahore, and Abdul Wali Khan University Mardan. Five participants were selected from each of these universities (total 20) through purposive sampling and thematic analysis method was used to identify themes from the data. We have used two theoretical models-Tinto social integration model (1995) and Braxton’s revised integration model (2014) as theoretical lenses that guided the analysis on ‘how jobs beyond the academia remains a challenge or opportunity for PhD-Studies completion’, ‘family life as a challenge or opportunity for PhD completion’, and ‘peer support as a blessing in PhD-studies completion’. The study findings suggest diverse experiences of PhD scholars while completing their studies, for instance jobs beyond the academia remains a challenge for some PhD scholars while for others an opportunity where non-academic jobs support them financially. Similarly, family life influenced PhD-studies of some scholars while others got support in completion of PhD-studies. However, peer support remains a blessing for most of the participants in completion of their studies.
... In this regard, a study has found that this balance can benefit the training process of the doctoral student and the professional experience, but only in the case that the current work tasks correspond to the thesis topic. The challenges of balancing study and work are highlighted (Bekova & Dzhafarova, 2019). ...
... We think that, in addition to this, more constructive ideas like academic motivation, psychological capital, and asset transfer must be expanded. We are confident that we can advance a positive doctoral education that makes "very happy people" by bringing out the best in people and enhancing their positive core (Bekova & Dzhafarova, 2019;Diener & Seligman, 2002;Seligman et al., 2009). ...
... • Encourage self-care strategies, stress management programs, and social support networks to foster resilience and prevent burnout (Morales, 2008;Prieto et al., 2022). • Implement flexible work-study policies to support students in balancing academic demands with professional and personal responsibilities (Bekova & Dzhafarova, 2019). ...
Article
Full-text available
Aim/Purpose: To evaluate the relationship between psychological capital, academic motivation, and academic performance in doctoral students and to develop a structural equation model that elucidates the interplay among these three variables, providing a comprehensive framework to better understand the factors influencing academic outcomes at the doctoral level. Background: Current research on the relationship between these variables in doctoral students is limited, with mostly independent approaches to each variable. This study seeks to overcome this research gap by exploring the intersection of these variables, providing a more holistic understanding of the motivational processes and positive psychological resources that impact the academic and personal success of doctoral students. Methodology: A quantitative approach with a non-experimental design and cross-sectional and correlational scope. The sample was collected by simple random sampling; 190 doctoral students participated, 82 men and 108 women. Three online scales were applied: the University Academic Performance Scale, the Short Academic Motivation Scale (SAMS), and the Psychological Capital Scale (PsyCap Scale). The following programs were used for data processing: SPSS version 25, AMOS version 24, and R-Project, and a six-step statistical procedure detailed in the manuscript was followed for data analysis. Contribution: This paper significantly advances doctoral education by addressing critical gaps and proposing valuable insights for future research. It offers a comprehensive understanding of challenges within doctoral programs, emphasizing factors like work-study balance and student well-being. Additionally, it advocates for a shift towards a positive paradigm, focusing on well-being and academic motivation. This paper catalyzes further innovation, fostering a deeper understanding of the doctoral experience. Findings: The three scales had a high internal consistency: PsyCap 0.858, AMS 0.844, and University Academic Performance 0.767. It is observed that the internal correlations with the dimensions are high. It was found that 38% of the respondents had a low level of PsyCap, 35% had a low level of academic motivation, and 36% had a high level of university academic performance. Amotivation was a singular behavior that was discussed in the study since all the responses were in the two extremes, high and low, with 0% at the medium level. It is observed that there are significant differences between males and females concerning academic motivation, and there are also significant differences between study cycles in academic motivation and performance. The occurrence of a “motivational curve” in doctoral students has been discovered. This finding shows a high motivation at the beginning of the doctoral program, an abrupt drop during the intermediate cycles, and a progressive and sustained rebound towards the final cycles, reaching the highest motivational peak at the end. It is observed that all the dimensions of the PsyCap variable are linearly positively related, with predominance in the Self-efficacy dimension (0.839); likewise, all the dimensions of the Academic Motivation variable are linearly positively related, with predominance in the Intrinsic Motivation to Know dimension (0.887). In addition, all the dimensions of the variable University Academic Performance are linearly positively related, with predominance in the dimension Contribution in academic activities (0.862). On the other hand, Introjected Regulation is positively related to the organization of teaching resources (0.198), organization of teaching resources is positively related to Self-efficacy (0.122), and Dedication to Study is negatively related to Resilience (-0.150). Some covariance errors were detected, and finally, according to the fit indicators, the estimated structural model is acceptable. Recommendations for Practitioners: Practitioners should develop tailored support programs focusing on building PsyCap and academic motivation, implement early intervention strategies to counteract motivational declines, adopt gender-sensitive approaches, integrate positive psychology practices, promote collaboration among students, continuously monitor program effectiveness, and provide faculty training to create a supportive academic environment. Recommendation for Researchers: Researchers should further explore the dynamic interplay between PsyCap, academic motivation, and performance longitudinally, employing mixed methods approaches to capture nuanced experiences. Additionally, investigating the effectiveness of intervention strategies targeting these variables and examining cultural and contextual influences on motivation and performance can enrich understanding and inform evidence-based practices. Impact on Society: Understanding the relationship between PsyCap, academic motivation, and university academic performance in doctoral students has significant implications for society. By elucidating the factors that contribute to academic success, this research can inform the development of more effective support systems within educational institutions. Empowering doctoral students with the psychological resources and motivation needed to thrive academically not only enhances individual well-being but also fosters innovation, knowledge creation, and societal advancement. Ultimately, by nurturing the next generation of scholars and researchers, this work contributes to the cultivation of a more knowledgeable, resilient, and prosperous society. Future Research: Among the limitations of the study was that the cross-sectional design restricted the possibility of establishing causal relationships since the data were collected at a single point in time. In addition, generalization of the findings should be approached with caution due to the size and composition of the sample, which was limited to doctoral students from a single country. The exclusive use of self-report scales could also have generated response and perception biases. Future research could adopt mixed approaches that integrate qualitative techniques to delve deeper into participants’ meanings and experiences. Also, the use of larger samples, including cross-country comparative studies, would allow for a more robust understanding of the relationship between psychological capital, academic motivation, and doctoral performance. Longitudinal designs would offer a better evaluation of the evolution of these variables over time. Regarding future thematic lines of research, there is a need to delve deeper into the balance between study, work, and doctoral well-being, as well as the success factors in face-to-face and virtual dynamics in the supervisor-candidate relationship and emotional management in the academic writing process. In addition, analyzing the motivational curve, characterized by a start with high motivation, an intermediate fall, and a final rebound, would allow the design of interventions to mitigate its impact on mental health and academic progress. Likewise, identifying risk and protective factors would contribute to strengthening the resilience of doctoral students.
... Career planning for college students can effectively control the excessive and disorderly flow of talents in the market [11], so that the phenomena of "job grabbing", "blind job selection", "high default rate" and "high employment cost" in the current job market for college graduates can be effectively controlled, and then overcome the phenomenon that employers lack "talents who want to be hired" and students "have no jobs", so as to make the society more stable and orderly [12][13][14], and gradually solve the social problems of college students' employment difficulties [15]. Only by carrying out effective career planning among college students can students' employment choices be diversified and rational, so as to play a benign role in promoting the broadening and diversion of college students' career selection channels, so as to achieve the purpose of alleviating employment pressure [16][17][18]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Colleges and universities are the main positions for cultivating skilled talents adapted to the development of the society; therefore, in order to be able to better promote the improvement of the quality of employment and the quality of career planning of students in higher vocational colleges and universities, this paper explores the career planning course and employment situation in colleges and universities. This study analyzed existing studies related to career planning courses and employment situations and compiled a scale for measuring career planning courses and employment situations. Subsequently, students from six colleges and universities in Province A were taken as the survey subjects for a one-year tracking survey, and the data of the sample subjects collected on three occasions were subjected to descriptive analysis and repeated variance measurement analysis. And after the common method bias test, the Pearson correlation test, as well as the establishment of cross-lag analysis, were performed on both. According to the analysis results of this study, the career planning courses of college students during their freshman and junior years interacted with their employment during their sophomore and senior years, with β coefficients of 0.133 and 0.132, respectively. With the addition of the variable of course grades, the students’ grades of career planning courses during their junior years would have a positive effect on their career planning and employment during their senior years; course grades can all have a positive and significant effect (p < 0.05). This study contributes to the effective alleviation of college students’ employment difficulties.
... Meanwhile, the expansion of the doctoral education scale has brought about a series of social competition issues. For example, the increase in doctoral graduates leads to an oversupply of highly qualified academic personnel, creating a structural imbalance in the labor market where job seekers far outnumber available tenure-track positions (Bekova & Dzhafarova, 2019;Golde & Dore, 2001). This mismatch and inefficiency in the doctoral graduate employment market result in degree devaluation and employment difficulties, heightening future development anxiety among doctoral students (Servage, 2009). ...
Article
Full-text available
The anxiety of doctoral students in school has consistently been a major concern in society and the medical community, stemming from pressures, such as the pursuit of identity within highly professional and fiercely competitive academic communities, the urgent drive for high-level original scientific research output, and the need to break through the limits of personal ability to complete in-depth academic training. Current research has focused on the prevalence of, causes of, and intervention strategies for anxiety among doctoral students, but it still exhibits deficiencies, such as overly generalized analytical methods, neglect of the diversity within the doctoral student population, and the incomplete theoretical framework for the mechanisms of influence. Therefore, our study aims to examine the anxiety status of different categories of doctoral students and to explore their anxiety intervention mechanisms. Specifically, we employ a mixed research method combining quantitative and qualitative approaches to address issues, such as the influencing factors of anxiety in different types of doctoral students, the mechanisms of action of each factor, and the formation of an influence mechanism framework. The results indicate that anxiety is prevalent among doctoral students, with the key influencing factors being gender, age, love and marriage pressure, and self-perception. Full-time and part-time doctoral students exhibit different anxiety states and causes on account of varying pressures related to graduation, employment, and family factors. Our research distinguishes the heterogeneity of anxiety among different types of doctoral students in China, innovatively constructing a set of anxiety intervention mechanisms for doctoral students. It aims to provide policy insights for the adjustment of their anxiety and hopes to offer novel perspectives and exemplary references for the theoretical research and practical exploration of doctoral students’ anxiety in other countries around the world.
... However, a monthly state stipend is dramatically low, thereby forcing all the categories of PhDs to work inside or outside universities. Precisely, 90% of all Russian doctoral students combine PhD studies with full-or part-time work (Bekova and Dzhafarova, 2019). The discourse of 'supporting' students and ECRs is widely present in state policies and institutional strategies (Tables 4 and 5). ...
Article
Full-text available
Numerous countries have implemented excellence initiatives designed to establish world-class universities, boost research productivity, build up staff capacity, and thereby reform doctoral education systems as part of this agenda. To date, the relationship between excellence-driven initiatives and leading universities' doctoral education enhancement remains understudied in Russia. This study seeks to examine how seven top-ranked Russian universities responded to the Excellence Initiatives (5-100 Project and Priority 2030) at the institutional strategy level from 2012 till 24 February 2022. To explore this relationship and change in research education, documentary research was applied to a corpus of institutional strategies for excellence accompanied with governmental texts. Norman Fairclough's Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) was adopted and complemented with analytical lenses to understand and examine how university excellence is recontextualised and operationalised in doctoral education structures across these strategies. This CDA was enhanced with theoretical lenses to research how multiple forces behind governmental policies for globalisation, innovation, and international competitiveness shape this change in Russian doctoral education in relation to global trends, national priorities, and local needs. The paper presents and discusses emergent processes (with mechanisms and practices) and the universities' meaning-making behind the normative and performative 'enhancement' in doctoral education constructed with the state's dominant understandings of university excellence.
Article
Full-text available
This paper investigates whether employment is a relevant predictor of the time in which Ph.D. students complete the program and earn the degree in Brazil. Based on human capital theory, it is argued that professional activities may alter the costs and benefits faced by students because of the extra effort necessary to balance professional activities with the requirements to continue and progress in the program. Based on this argument, the first hypothesis investigated herein is that there is a positive correlation (conditional on the relevant covariates) between employment during the Ph.D. and the time expected to successfully complete it. It is also hypothesized that public employment predicts a shorter time of completion than private employment. Such associations are empirically tested using a novel dataset with information on Brazilian Ph.D. students from the CAPES database merged with employment data from the ‘Annual Social Information Report’ (RAIS). The results indicate that, holding all else constant, each year of the Ph.D. in which a student is employed is associated with a 0.145 additional year necessary for completion of the program. Employment in the public sector is found to predict a higher time of completion than employment in the private sector, but the difference between the estimated coefficients is small and not meaningful. These findings provide relevant insights for the design and improvement of Ph.D. programs and evaluation systems that acknowledge and take into consideration the context in which these students develop their studies and research.
Article
Full-text available
The study examines the effects of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research grant programme for doctoral students. It analyses the impact of the programme, implemented in 2019–2020, designed to support dissertation research among doctoral candidates. The study investigates the effects of receiving a grant on doctoral students’ outcomes and scientific productivity, specifically their successful thesis defense and publication activity. A quasi-experimental design is employed, utilizing Propensity Score Matching (number of students in the experimental group N = 1 073). The results demonstrate that receiving a grant significantly increases the likelihood of successful thesis defense – grant recipients are 70% more likely to defend successfully compared to non-recipients, all other things being equal. Grant recipients are also more likely to complete their dissertations within the standard timeframe. Furthermore, receiving a grant positively influences doctoral students’ publication activity. The effect of the grant does not differ based on the gender or the type of institution. These findings underscore the importance of financial support for successful dissertation completion and encourage further research into the mechanisms by which various forms of financial support influence doctoral students’ outcomes, as well as comparative studies on the effectiveness of grants versus other forms of support.
Article
Full-text available
Introducción: Dadas sus características y su simbolismo, el doctorado es un proceso formativo que genera altas expectativas, tanto de la sociedad como de quienes realizan los estudios. Sin embargo, la obtención del doctorado no asegura una exitosa trayectoria laboral y académica. Metodología: Se realizó un estudio en base a resultados de una encuesta nacional chilena, para comparar la evaluación del proceso formativo y las trayectorias de quienes hicieron su doctorado en el extranjero, respecto a los que realizaron dichos estudios en Chile. Resultados: Se identificaron diferencias significativas favorables a las personas graduadas en el extranjero respecto a las que lo hicieron en Chile respecto de los índices de condiciones de desarrollo del doctorado, valoración de la calidad del doctorado cursado y en parte de los indicadores de trayectoria laboral. Sin embargo, a medida que los datos consideraban variables más objetivas, especialmente relacionadas con la productividad académica, estas diferencias se hicieron menores y no significativas. Discusión: Los resultados de esta investigación llaman a profundizar en las formas en que la calidad formativa del doctorado se vincula con las trayectorias futuras de las personas, pero también en cómo contribuye a las expectativas sociales que este programa.
Article
Full-text available
This study aims to identify challenges in the training of scientific personnel in the field of social sciences and humanities at the doctoral level in Kazakhstan. It proceeds from the assumption that successful completion of a Ph.D. program is conditioned by internal and external factors that influence the educational process and may lead to challenges in Ph.D. thesis defense. The study employs an explanatory-sequential approach within a mixed-methods design, incorporating economic-statistical, regression, and content analysis. Data were gathered through questionnaires from 61 current students and graduates of Ph.D. programs in the social sciences and humanities. Findings indicate that having a job made it more challenging for respondents to study and complete their Ph.D. programs, as employment requires time and effort; however, the additional monthly income besides scholarship helped reduce financial stress, thereby supporting their academic progress. Women found studying easier than men, while married respondents experienced fewer challenges than single ones. Although 36.1% of respondents expressed high satisfaction with Ph.D. training quality, the majority reported challenges, with 65.65% noting issues in the educational process, 52.5% identifying problems in scientific supervision, 33% raising concerns about teacher qualifications, and 25% highlighting infrastructure needs. Key factors influencing Ph.D. completion rates included an unstable study environment, characterized by frequent changes in regulations, and students’ difficulties in meeting government-imposed requirements, especially publication in a Scopus database journal. The study’s practical value is developing measures to enhance Ph.D. thesis defense rates by improving admission requirements, restricting external employment, increasing supervisor accountability, and adjusting publication standards. Acknowledgments This research has been funded by the Science Committee of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Republic of Kazakhstan (AP19680246 “Building up highly intelligent human resources in the conditions of digitalization of the economy of Kazakhstan: problems and prospects”, 2023–2025) and supported the Oxus Society for Central Asian Affairs (program “Advancing data-driven solutions by strengthening partnerships between the scientific, academic and civil sectors in Central Asia”, 2023–2024).
Article
Full-text available
Since the collapse of the Soviet Union and the opening of borders, numerous measures have been taken to internationalize Russian science. In particular, publications in journals that are listed in international scientific citation databases have become a point of closer focus. Universities and scientific organizations began inviting foreign professors and sending their own staff and students abroad on international internships. After the start of the Special Military Operation in Ukraine in 2022, Russian science faced numerous sanctions that entailed a reduction in international cooperation. However Russian scientists have accumulated 30 years of experience in active participation in international cooperation and academic mobility. Nevertheless, there is still a significant lack of understanding of how this experience will impact the scientific careers of Russian scientists going forward. In this article, the authors present the results of a study dedicated to exploring this issue. The theoretical framework for the analysis is based on such a concept as “the Three Careers of an Academic” (organizational, cognitive, and community careers) proposed by German experts in sociology of science Johan Gläser and Grit Laudel. The empirical data used in the study include materials from in-depth interviews with young scientists under the age of 39, collected in 2020–2021 as part of a project known as “International Mobility of Russian Young Researchers”, as well as the results of a sociological survey of 7,255 highly productive scientists conducted under the “Monitoring of education markets and organizations” in 2022. All respondents had spent more than three months abroad. The study revealed that international mobility has a comprehensive impact, noticeable in all three components of a scientific career. Acquired knowledge and skills, as well as involvement in international projects contribute to the development of a researcher’s cognitive career, while new professional connections promote advancement in the international scientific community. As for the “organizational dimension” of a career, mobility does not have a direct influence on career advancement. However, mobility often leads to personal changes, particularly influencing one’s determination to switch jobs and seek better conditions. These assessments are presented for the first time and can be useful in developing recommendations for science and technology policies regarding the revision of mobility support programs in light of the new geopolitical reality.
Article
Full-text available
This exploratory study determined PhD completions at a research-intensive university in New Zealand and considered factors affecting PhD completions. Completion data were calculated for PhD cohorts at the University of Otago from 2000 to 2012 (n = 2770) and survival models determined whether gender, enrolment status, age at admission, citizenship, scholarship status and academic field influenced completion. The impact of the doctoral programme and the research environment was also considered. Across all cohorts, 83% submitted their thesis for examination (17% withdrawal). The median submission time was 3.4 years for full-timers, with a median completion time (to award of degree) of 4.1 years. Survival modelling showed that completion can be enhanced by having mainly full-time candidates, but also allowing periods of part-time enrolment near submission, recruiting a large international cohort, and providing three year scholarships. Health science candidates had the highest submission percentages, while commerce candidates submitted in the fastest times. There were only minor or negligible effects of gender and age at admission. Other factors contributing to high submission rates included recruiting quality candidates, close monitoring during candidature, provision of research training, a vibrant research culture, a personal performance coach, high-quality supervision and funding incentives for candidates who submit in under four years.
Article
Full-text available
Despite the increasing popularity of doctoral education, many students do not complete their studies, and very little information is available about them. Understanding why some students consider that they do not want to, or cannot, continue with their studies is essential to reduce dropout rates and to improve the overall quality of doctoral programmes. This study focuses on the motives students give for considering dropping out of their doctoral degree. Participants were 724 social sciences doctoral students from 56 Spanish universities, who responded to a questionnaire containing doctoral degree conditions questions and an open-ended question on motives for dropping out. Results showed that a third of the sample, mainly the youngest, female and part time students, stated that they had intended to drop out. The most frequent motives for considering dropping out were difficulties in achieving a balance between work, personal life and doctoral studies and problems with socialization. Overall, results offer a complex picture that has implications for the design of doctoral programmes, such as the conditions and demands of part-time doctoral studies or the implementation of educational proposals that facilitate students’ academic and personal integration into the scientific community in order to prevent the development of a culture of institutional neglect.
Article
Full-text available
“Academic inbreeding”—involving the appointment of faculty members who graduated from the institution employing them—is considered a small and peripheral aspect of the academic profession but is quite widespread globally. This paper analyzes the nature of inbreeding and its impact on universities. Data from eight countries where inbreeding is widespread are analyzed in order to examine the perceived impact of the phenomenon on academics and universities. Our analysis reveals that while inbreeding has deleterious effects on universities, it is widely perceived as a “normal” part of academic life—and some positive aspects are evident.
Chapter
This paper contributes to the literature on overeducation by empirically investigating the wage penalty of job-education mismatch among PhD holders who completed their studies in Italy; a country where the number of new doctoral recipients has dramatically increased over recent years while personnel employed in R&D activities is still below the European average. We use cross-sectional micro-data collected in 2009 and rely on different definitions of education-job mismatch such as, overeducation, overskilling, and dissatisfaction with the use of skills. We find that overeducation and skills dissatisfaction are associated with significantly lower wages but there is no wage penalty from overskilling. Furthermore, those who simultaneously report overeducation and skills dissatisfaction experience a particularly high wage penalty.
Article
This contribution is based on an analysis of recent changes in doctoral education that can be observed in Europe and China. It traces the policies having led to these changes and discusses related policy transfer. The contribution is divided into five parts. It begins by sketching recent changes in doctoral education in the framework of the European Bologna Process and the framework of Chinese higher education reforms looking at similarities and differences in the underlying rationales. The second part will elaborate on the extended policy field for doctoral education which is no longer regarded as an exclusively academic affair but has become an object of institutional management, national policy-making and – at least in Europe – supra-national agenda setting. The third part will take a closer look at the multiplication of purposes and models for doctoral education. While in Europe, altogether, nine different types of doctoral education and training can be identified, China has just started to diversify its doctoral training by adding professional degrees and (in engineering) joint doctoral programmes to the traditional pathway. The fourth part will discuss two overarching issues which are equally in the centre of debates and policy-making in Europe and in China-quality management and internationalisation of doctoral education. In the last and concluding part, we will reflect on the implications of the extended policy field and the diversification of doctoral education models in terms of the question of how this reflects on quality assurance mechanisms, who is qualified to convey the extended skills set and whether academic careers remain sufficiently attractive to attract the best and the brightest talent.
Article
In this article, the determinants of 'time to dropout' from doctoral studies and 'time to PhD completion' are studied using a discrete-time competing risks survival analysis for a sample of 3092 doctoral candidates from the Universite libre de Bruxelles. Not surprisingly, results show that students supported with research fellowships have much higher PhD completion hazards than teaching assistants or unfinanced students. Concerning dropout, students with no financing showed the highest withdrawal rate, while students with selective research fellowships showed the lowest one. Dropout is also influenced by the ability of the student, which is correlated to their success in the fellowship allocation procedure. However, the type of financial support influences time to dropout from doctoral studies even when controlling for the ability of the student. Finally, our findings suggest that there are no significant differences in dropout and degree completion between fields of study, except for unfinanced students.
Article
Two models of graduate student degree progress were developed: one at the master's level and one at the doctoral level. The models link department and student characteristics, financial support, and student perceptions of the faculty with grades, involvement in one's program, satisfaction with the department, and alienation in order to predict graduate degree progress.
Article
A satisfactory relationship between doctoral students and their advisors is an essential component of successful doctoral training. Using responses to a national survey of doctoral students in the US from 27 universities and 11 disciplines, this paper explores factors affecting students' satisfaction with the advising relationship. We find that both the criteria used in selecting an advisor and reported advisor behaviours influence satisfaction. Moreover, there are pronounced disciplinary differences in both choice criteria and advisor behaviour, and these are more robust predictors of satisfaction than individual characteristics.
Article
Prior observers have consistently found a negative relationship between school performance and the intensity of high school students' employment. However, few observers have thought carefully enough about exactly why student employment and schooling outcomes are related. Most have used a zero-sum model of students' resource allocation to explain this relationship. The author identifies conceptual problems with the zero-sum model and proposes a social psychological primary orientation model to explain this association. He then uses new data collected in a pilot study on adolescent employment that allows him to weight the merits of these competing models. In an exploratory analysis, the author finds that these data are more consistent with the primary orientation model than with the zero-sum perspective.