ArticlePDF Available

SEPARATION OF MANAGEMENT AND OWNERSHIP OF PROPERTY: REVISITING THE POWERS AND DUTIES OF A TRUSTEE

May 2008

Authors:

Grace Akolokwu

Rivers State University Port Harcourt

Content uploaded by Grace Akolokwu

Content may be subject to copyright.

A preview of the PDF is not available

ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.

PT 819. Page 366. Particularly at 379. Jc Unibiz (Nig) Ltd V C.B.C.L. Ltd (203 6 N\fi/L R PT 816

Jan 2003
408

L R Nw

!' (2003) 17 NW.L.R. PT 819. Page 366. Particularly at 379. Jc Unibiz (Nig) Ltd V C.B.C.L. Ltd (203 6 N\fi/L R PT 816. Page 408.

Conference Paper

Legal Aspects of Engineering Asset Management

November 2013

Immovable assets include engineered infrastructure such as buildings, manufacturing plant, roads and railways. These assets are built on land. In most jurisdictions, proposals to acquire and/or establish immovable assets on landed property must comply with several legislative provisions. In many instances, the acquisition and/or establishment of an immovable asset becomes embroiled in legal ... [Show full abstract] disputes between contending stakeholders asserting rights to ownership/custodianship of land. Such disputes add to the costs of capital development projects, mergers and acquisitions, and influence decisions as to where an asset intensive business venture can be located. Legislation not only provides the means to resolve ownership/custodianship rights but also, it stipulates legal imperatives for control and utilization of engineering assets on landed property. It is in this regard that this paper presents some of the legal aspects of engineering asset management.

Article

Full-text available

The spacing of mature forest habitat in relation to species-specific scales in managed boreal forest...

May 2000 · Annales Zoologici Fennici

Modern forestry alters the structure of boreal forest landscapes, and this affects several forest species with different habitat requirements. Quantitative analyses of the structure of real landscapes are scarce, although this information will be needed in landscape- level planning and management applications. We investigated the occurrence and con- figuration of mature forest (> 80-100 year) in ... [Show full abstract] relation to five different extents (ranging from 20 to 7 854 ha) of circular landscapes around random points in managed forest environment in NE Finland. The habitat type was coarsely chosen according to require- ments of certain resident birds and mammals. We present an approach where species- specific home-range scales are related to the observed environmental heterogeneity pattern for assessing the potential of actual landscapes to maintain these species. As a result we found that there is a minority of landscapes where total area of mature forest was comparable to species' home ranges. Irrespective of the scale examined, the aver- age proportion of habitat in a landscape was approximately 15%. Besides that the ma- ture forest was physically fragmented already on a scale relevant to individual animals, the variation in habitat proportion between landscapes decreased rapidly when the land- scape extent was increased. This decrease of variation occurs on surprisingly small scales; the forest landscape structure is unintentionally altered due to small-patterned land ownership, even age distribution of managed stands, and small variation in regen- eration patch size. In terms of related landscape metrics, we also compare our results with patterns achieved in randomly generated neutral landscape models.

View full-text

Article

Full-text available

Inside/out: change agents and community partnerships

July 1998 · The Healthcare Forum journal

Arthur Turovh Himmelman

View full-text

Article

Full-text available

CEO Incentives and Firm Productivity

November 2005 · SSRN Electronic Journal

This paper investigates the relationship between firm productivity and CEO performance incentives in a sample of 917 U.S. manufacturing firms during the period 1992-2003. We first find that CEO equity ownership enhances firm productivity and that firm productivity enhances corporate financial performance. We then find that the relationship between CEO performance incentives and productivity is ... [Show full abstract] quite complex. There is an inverse U-shaped relationship between productivity and the sensitivity of CEO wealth to share value (delta), which suggests that the high CEO portfolio risk associated with high delta discourages CEOs from undertaking risky positive-NPV, productivity-enhancing projects. We also find that greater sensitivity of CEO option wealth to stock return volatility (vega) generally increases firm productivity, consistent with stock option grants making CEOs less concerned with risk due to the down-side protection it offers. However, for a range of delta values, higher vega may actually reduce productivity, a result that has not been previously documented empirically. This suggests that stock options may not always achieve their intended effect of making CEOs less risk-averse. These results highlight the importance of careful structuring of CEO compensation contracts. Encouragingly, we find that CEO performance incentives positively impact productivity for the vast majority of the firms in our sample.

View full-text