Kooperative (urbane) Praxis - Räume, Akteure und Wissenbildung in der Stadtentwicklung
Abstract
Die Publikation „Kooperative (urbane) Praxis – Räume, Akteure + Wissensbildung in der Stadtentwicklung“ der Wüstenrot Stifung und des Urban Research and Design Laboratory der Technischen Universität Berlin besteht aus zwei zusammenhängenden Teilen. Der Teil „Werkstatt“ dokumentiert den Austausch, der während einer praxisorientierten Werkstatt
im Sommer 2016 auf dem Gelände der ExRotaprint gGmbH in Berlin stattfand. Der Teil „Projektbeispiele“ stellt acht Projekte vor, die Impulsgeber der Werkstatt waren.
... One of the main stimuli for such a development is 'the knowledge itself of citizens/inhabitants own living environment'. Involved citizens can generate and share knowledge, and qualify themselves through further accumulated experiences in such projects [Alfaro-d'Alençon and Bauerfeind, 2017]. Though, the return-oriented development projects consist of certain correlations between the scope of a project and private sector actors including the power asymmetries (ibid). ...
... In the frame of our study on social-spatial inclusiveness, various forms of cooperative actor structures have been observed (the case of European context -Berlin city), who are able to take part in processes. For example, in the realm of urban conversion and renewal projects, a higher percentage of citizen involvement is identified in comparison to standard urban development projects [Alfaro-d'Alençon and Bauerfeind, 2017]. ...
Under new state-led governance models, a new generation of city entrepreneurs seeks to define work and living environments to meet their needs and aspirations in a collaborative way. In this field, international discourses are debating private investors as key players in urban development and the simultaneous withdrawal/absence of the state. This has led to more complex networks of participating actors and conflictive urban development patterns. Strategies are needed to understand the influence of commons-based space production. From the research project DFG-KOPRO-Int, the Authors aim to define learnings from urban development and housing projects, involved actors, processes and material quality of the projects. Abstract Citizen science; Community action; Science and policy-making Keywords https://doi.
Die Beiträge dieses Bandes gingen aus einer Tagung hervor, die im September 2021 in Bamberg unter dem Titel „Die große Kraft des Kollektivs“. Kollaboratives Arbeiten in der Architektur vom 20. Jahrhundert bis zur Gegenwart durchgeführt wurde. Die Veranstaltung wiederum war Bestandteil des von der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) geförderten Projekts Architektur- und Planungskollektive der DDR – Institutionelle Strukturen und kreative Prozesse in der sozialistischen Architekturproduktion. Ziel der Tagung war es, die im DFG-Projekt nur auf die DDR-Zeit orientierte Analyse von Architekturkollektiven in den längeren und größeren Kontext kollektiver und kollaborativer Zusammenarbeit in der Architektur in der avantgardistischen Zwischenkriegszeit, den während des Kalten Kriegs in westlichen Ländern praktizierenden Kollektive und international tätigen Kollektiven bis zur Gegenwart zu integrieren. Auf diese Weise sollte der Horizont kollektiv-kollaborativen Arbeitens jenseits der sozialistischen Praxis in der DDR erweitert und internationalisiert werden. Mit dieser Zielsetzung wurden im Rahmen der Tagung gemeinschaftlich arbeitende Zusammenschlüsse von Architekt*innen aus unterschiedlichen Kontexten und aus unterschiedlicher Perspektive betrachtet, um so die vielfältigen damit verbundene Vorstellungen und Praxen zu verdeutlichen und aus einem breit angelegten Vergleich evtl. auch Möglichkeiten zur Schärfung verschiedener Konzepte abzuleiten.
While it was a matter of interdisciplinary work undertaken between experts in the 1960s, today transdisciplinary planning involves diverse actors. On the basis of case studies, beginning with the Olympic Village in 1960s Munich and taking a more indepth look at current developments in the arts quarter of the former Blumengroßmarkt in Berlin, this article documents collective planning in architecture and urban development and how it has changed. In both cases, urban and architectural planning has fundamentally questioned the designs and role of architecture. Architects involved in the construction of the Olympic Village became mediators of increasingly complex planning tasks within large, expert planning teams involved in the planning from an early stage. To this end, architecture planned in isolation would be replaced by the designs of planning teams. The aim was to systematize the process and make it more objective, as well as to de-hierarchize it to become collaborative and interdisciplinary. Planning tasks are still viewed
as complex today, but current discourses point to a planning practice supported by diverse actors, one that is much more about transdisciplinarity and cooperation
between different individuals. Building on this, two main trends can be identified: Professional interest is directed, firstly, towards the possibilities of developing spaces collectively and, secondly, according to the local competences of the various actors involved in collaboratively created projects. The focus here is on the learning experience arising through the development of the space and the self-empowerment of project participants.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any references for this publication.