Content uploaded by Tunde Amusan
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Tunde Amusan on May 22, 2019
Content may be subject to copyright.
158
Ethiopian Journal of Environmental Studies & Management 12(2): 158 – 166, 2019.
ISSN:1998-0507 doi: https://ejesm.org/doi/v12i2.4
Submitted: January 31, 2019 Accepted: April 15, 2019
A SURVEY OF BUTTERFLY FAUNA IN THE SACRED GROVE OF UMUAJA FOREST,
SOUTHERN NIGERIA
OJIANWUNA, C. C.
1
AND *AMUSAN, B. O.
2
1
Department of Animal and Environmental Biology, Delta State University, Abraka, Delta
State, Nigeria
2
Department of Zoology, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria
*Corresponding author: tundeamusan5@yahoo.com
Abstract
Sacred groves in Africa have been widely adopted as an important strategy to assuage the
loss of biodiversity. This has led to the protection of sacred groves (which are virgin forest
with rich diversity) for their cultural, religious beliefs and taboos. This study represents the
first butterfly survey of the Umuaja sacred grove and this was done with the aim of
determining the diversity and abundance of butterflies in the grove as an estimate of the
ecological status of the protected area. Sweep nets, fruit and rotten fish-baited traps were
used to sample the butterflies from March – May, 2017. A total of 72 individuals,
representing 14 species in 3 families (Nymphalidae Pieridae and Lyacenidae) were recorded
in this study. Nymphalidae (92%) was the highest in terms of species richness (78.6%) and
abundance (91.7) while Lycaenidae was the least (3%). Charaxes boueti (a typical bamboo
forest species) was dominant with relative abundance of 30.6. Several forest indicator
species such as the Melanitis leda, Bicyclus evadne elionas, Charaxes varanes, Melanitis
libya, Eurema hecabe and Mylothris chloris were also recorded. Therefore, Umuaja sacred
grove was considered to be in stable ecological condition based on the species composition,
diversity and the species richness.
Key Words: Butterfly, Diversity, Sacred Grove, Forest, Ecological Status
Introduction
Butterflies belong to an important
order of insects (Lepidoptera) studied and
documented globally since the 18
th
century (Ghazoul, 2002). They are
generally considered as surrogate
representatives of environmental quality
changes (Amusan et al., 2014). These
insects, especially the endemic species
have been widely used as indicators of
habitat biodiversity, because they respond
quickly to environmental changes and
taxa diversity (Ghazanfar et al., 2016).
Also, butterflies have been used as
important ‘model’ organisms used for
centuries, to investigate many areas of
biological research, including such
diverse fields as navigation, pest control,
mimicry, evolution, genetics, population
dynamics and biodiversity conservation
(Widhiono, 2015).
In Tropical Africa,
especially in Nigeria, conservation of
biodiversity in degrading forests have
been a major concern where a lot of forests
have been lost to deforestation and human
activities (Onyekwelu and Olusola, 2014).
This work is licensed to the publisher under the Creative Commons Attributions License 4.0
159
For instance, statistics from global forest
assessment revealed that Nigeria lost
about 410,000 ha (3.7%) of its natural
forest due to deforestation between 2000
and 2010 (FRA, 2010; FAO, 2011). This
has led to reduction in the abundance and
species richness or extinction of forest
dwelling species.
One of the indirect ways that
biodiversity has been preserved in local
communities is the establishment of
sacred groves. Sacred groves are usually
virgin forest with multi diversity that has
been protected by the local people for a
very long time for their cultural and
religious practices (Onyekwelu and
Olusola, 2014). These protected forests
are usually associated with traditional
regulations such as taboos, totems and
myths that limit human exploitation
within the areas. These regulations have
long preserved the ecological integrity of
the sacred forests and appear to play an
important role in the conservation of
biodiversity in the groves. In some regions
in this country, sacred groves represent
probably the only remaining examples of
old forest vegetation which retain rare and
endangered species. As such many of the
groves are described as “biodiversity
hotspots” (Myers et al. 2000). As a result,
these sacred groves clearly deserve
conservation attention and this is
necessitated by the declining cultural
practices, taboos and the increased
pressure for agricultural land.
The enormous importance of
butterflies has made its study receive
global attention and several research
efforts have revealed high diversity of
butterflies in various forests and
landscapes (Larsen, 1995; Gaude and
Janarthanam, 2015). Some of the few
available studies on butterflies in Nigeria
include; Perveen and Fazal (2013), Zarim
and Ahmed (2014), Amusan et al. (2014)
and Ogedengbe et al. (2014). However,
information on the ecological value of
sacred/protected forests in terms of its
biodiversity is limited because it is
difficult to access some of these sites.
Comprehensive and long term studies are
required to assess the diversity of insects
in sacred groves and other protected areas
in the country to assess the diversity of
insects in the areas in order to understand
the important role which the groves play
in the conservation of biodiversity. This
study is therefore aimed at providing a
checklist of species of butterflies
inhabiting the Umuaja sacred grove which
is a unique bamboo-dominated riparian
forest in the Niger Delta area of Southern
Nigeria. The abundance and diversity of
the species of butterflies will serve as a
good indication of the health of the
environment in and around the grove.
Materials and Methods
Study Area
Umuaja sacred grove is located in
Ukwuani Local Government Area in Delta
State. The grove covers Longitude 006
o
14′ - 006
o
19′ E and Latitude 05
o
56′- 5
o
63′ N (Fig. 1). River Ethiope (a very
important river in the Niger Delta Area)
takes its source from the grove and it flows
from the foot of a huge silk-cotton tree
(Ceiba pentandra). This river is believed
to be the deepest Inland waterway in
Africa. The river flows through different
towns such as Abraka, Eku and Sapele and
empties into the Benin River which
eventually empties into the Atlantic Ocean
at Koko.
The area is rich in green vegetation
and the grove contains varieties of tree
species which include mainly Bamboos
(Bambusa vulgaris), Palm tree (Elaeis
guineensis), Raphia palm (Raphia
A Survey of Butterfly Fauna in the Sacred Grove of Umuaja
Forest................Ojianwuna & Amusan
160
hookeri), Bush mango (Irvingia
gabonensis), Teak (Tectona grandis) and
a host of grasses of the Poacea family.
Although, the main occupations of the
indigenes of Umuaja community are
farming and fishing. However, these
activities are not allowed in the grove
because of its sacred nature.
Fig. 1: The location of Umuaja sacred grove in Delta State and Nigeria.
Sampling of Butterflies
Intensive sampling of butterflies was
carried out three times a week for 12
weeks (March – May 2017) using aerial
nets, fish and banana-baited traps.
Sampling of butterflies was usually
carried out between 7:00am and 10:00am
in the morning and between 4:00pm and
6:00pm in the evenings when the
butterflies are expected to be most active
(Zarim and Ahmed, 2014; Ojianwuna,
2015). The banana bait was prepared by
mashing the banana into smaller pieces.
Thereafter, a heap spoon of sugar, yeast
and 1 litre of Beer were mixed with the
banana to aid fermentation process. This
mixture was placed in an air-tight
container for three days to allow for
fermentation before use. The fish bait was
also prepared in the same manner. A total
of Eighteen (18) traps i.e nine (9) with
each bait type were used. The traps were
placed 10m apart from each other and
about 2m above ground under patches of
sunlight (Aduse-Poku and Doku-Marfo,
2007).
Species Handling and Identification
Standard field handling of specimens
was ensured by killing (pinch on the
thorax) and taken to the Laboratory where
Ethiopian Journal of Environmental Studies and Management Vol. 12 no.2 2019
161
they were set with entomological pins (No
3) on a setting board and kept in a dark
place to dry for one week (CSIRO, 2004).
The butterfly specimens were identified
using appropriate standard taxonomic
keys and guides (Larsen, 2005). After the
specimens have been identified, they were
kept in a display case and preserved with
naphthalene (Youdeowei, 1977).
Results
A total of 72 individuals were
recorded in this study. This comprised 14
species distributed in 3 families (Table 1).
Nymphalidae was the highest in terms of
species richness (78.6%) and abundance
(91.7) while Lycaenidae had the least
percentage of species and individuals (Fig.
2).
Table 1: Composition and abundance of butterflies in Umuaja sacred grove
Family Sub-family Species Common Names Relative
Abundance
Nymphalidae Charaxinae Charaxes boueti (Feisthamel, 1850)
Bamboo charaxes 30.6
Charaxes ameliae doumeti
(Henning, 1989)
Blue-spotted
charaxes
2.8
Charaxes tiridates tridates
(Cramer, 1777)
Splendid common
blue charaxes
16.7
Charaxes varanes vologeses
(Linnè, 1876)
Pearl charaxes 5.6
Satyrinae Melanitis leda (Linnè, 1758) Common evening
brown
13.9
Melanitis libya(Distant, 1882)
Velvet eyed
evening brown
2.8
Gnophodes betsimena parmeno
(Doubleday, 1849)
Yellow banded
evening brown
2.8
Bicyclus sandace (Hewitson, 1877) Dark vulga bush
brown
2.8
Bicyclus evadne elionas (Hewitson,
1866)
Small stately bush
brown
8.3
Limenitinidae Euphaedra medon medon
(Linnè, 1763)
Widespread
forester
2.8
Nymphalinidae Precis milonia milonia (Felder &
Felder, 1867)
Broad banded
commodore
2.8
Pieridae Pierinae Mylothris chloris chloris
(Fabricius, 1775)
Dotted boarder 2.8
Coliadinae Eurema hecabe solifera
(Butler, 1875)
Common grass
yellow
2.8
Lycaenidae Liphyrinae Aslauga vininga vininga
(Hewitson, 1875)
Central aslauga 2.8
A Survey of Butterfly Fauna in the Sacred Grove of Umuaja
Forest................Ojianwuna & Amusan
162
Fig 2: Abundance of butterflies (families) in the Umuaja grove, Delta State, Nigeria.
The identified species are distributed
in 7 Subfamilies namely; Charaxinae,
Satyrinae, Limentidinae, Nymphalinae,
Pierinae, Coeliadinae and Liphyrinae.
Analysis of the relative abundance of the
recorded species showed that Charaxes
boueti was dominant in the grove with a
relative abundance of 30.6. Species which
occurred with the least relative abundance
are; Charaxes amelia, Gnophodes
betsimena, Eurema medon, Bicyclus
sandace, Precis milonia, Mylothris
chloris, Eurema hecabe and Aslauga
vininga. The diversity indices showed that
species richness and diversity was highest
in March while May had the least species
diversity and richness (Table 2).
Table 2: Diversity of Butterflies in Umuaja grove, March –May, 2017.
Months Simson’s Index Margalef Menhinicks
March 9.35 1.95 1.33
April 6.21 1.40 1.00
May 2.13 0.84 0.67
Discussion
According to Larsen (2005), about
1500 butterfly species have been recorded
in West Africa and about 1000 species of
have been reported in Nigeria. This
implied that the estimated abundance of
butterflies in this study accounted for
about 0.93% of butterflies recorded in
West Africa and about 1.4% of total
butterflies that have been reported in
Nigeria. This suggested that the grove can
be considered fairly rich in terms of
species diversity when compared with
other similar studies such as Ramesh et al.
(2010), Addai and Baidoo (2013) and
Saikia (2014). The fairly rich fauna may
be attributed may be attributed to the
homogeneity nature of the vegetation
(mainly bamboo) in the groove. Vu and
Vu (2011) had reported that forests
dominated by bamboo usually have low
species diversity compared to natural
Nymphalidae
Pieridae
Lycaenidae
Ethiopian Journal of Environmental Studies and Management Vol. 12 no.2 2019
163
undisturbed forests. Another factor that
could have contributed to the low species
diversity is the reduced light penetration
as a result of dense canopy formed by the
bamboo vegetation in the groove. Studies
have shown that light is an important
factor which limit butterfly diversity and
assemblage as they are known to be most
active during sunny weather (Hill et al.,
2001).
However, the high number of
individuals may be attributed to the
presence of River Ethiope which served as
a source of water within the grove.
Another possible reason for the high
number of individuals recorded in the
grove is the nature of the habitat which
supports lower story and undergrowth
vegetation, muds and sands with minerals.
All these are potential food sources for
butterflies and thus could have been
responsible for the high number of
butterflies resident in the grove.
The occurrence of Nymphalidae as the
most abundant and diverse family
corroborate the existing body of data that
reported Nymphalidae as the most diverse
and abundant family in forests in Southern
part of Nigeria (Nganso et al., 2012;
Amusan et al., 2014). Other studies in
which Nymphalidae occurred with the
highest abundance and diversity include;
Jothimani et al. (2014), Kurmar and
Murugesan (2014) and Widhiono (2015).
Although, Nwosu and Iwu (2011) reported
a very low number of butterflies in the
family Nymphalidae in a similar forest
area. The low number recorded in the
study was attributed to low density of host
plants and nectar plants (Tiple, 2009). The
high number of butterflies in
Nymphalidae has implications for
pollination in this area because these
species have been known to be
exceptional fruit-feeding butterflies.
Therefore, the high number of
Nymphalidae recorded in this study may
be attributed to the presence of rotten
fruits, carrions, human sweat and
availability of host plants. Another
possible reason is that members of this
family have been known to be strong
active fliers and this enables them to
search and locate food over a long
distance and large area (Lodh and
Agarwala, 2012). The low occurrence of
members of the Pieridae and Lycaenidae
may be attributed to the fact that they are
not easily attracted to traps. Their small
size and host specificity may also be
responsible for their low occurrence in the
grove (Perveen and Khan, 2014). The
members of these two families have been
known to have preference for sunny
weather but the amount of solar radiation
in the grove was greatly reduced by the
dense canopy formed by the riparian
bamboo vegetation (Nair et al. 2014).
The higher species richness and
abundance of the butterflies in March
compare to the other months may be
attributed to convergence at water source
and rate of capture. During the dry
periods, butterfly are known to aggregate
around water source for drink and
nourishment unlike the wet season when
water is available in all the microhabitats
in the grove (Nair et al., 2007; Nganso et
al., 2012; Kumar and Murugesan, 2014).
Butterflies are also known to avoid heated
environment, so they tend to move
towards cooler areas. Hence, the ease of
capture and the greater number of
individuals collected in that particular
month. Similar observations were
reported by Janzer and Schoener (1968)
and Vu and Vu (2011) in which greater
abundance and diversity of butterflies
were reported around riparian vegetation
in dry seasons than the wet season.
A Survey of Butterfly Fauna in the Sacred Grove of Umuaja
Forest................Ojianwuna & Amusan
164
Although, the occurrence of indicator
species such as; Melanitis leda, Melanitis
libya, Charaxes varanes, Eurema hecabe
and Mylothris chloris could be an
indication of threatened ecosystem but the
numbers recorded suggested that the
threat is apparent. These species have
been reported to only be comfortable in
close forest condition in low numbers
(Bossart et al., 2006; Boafo, 2010 and
Nganso et al., 2012) but the occurrence of
high numbers of individuals could be an
indication of habit fragmentation (Larsen
2005). However, findings in this study
revealed that only M. leda occurred with a
reasonable number of individuals (relative
abundance = 13.9) while the other
indicator species were recorded in very
low numbers (relative abundance = 2.8).
Conclusion
The preliminary assessment of the
butterfly fauna of the Umuaja grove has
contributed to the booming body of
knowledge that sacred groves are potential
biodiversity hotspots. The protected land
supports the resident populations of forest
indicator species which was an indication
of the stability of the ecological status of
the forest. However, the occurrence of
certain tolerant species suggested
potential sources of threat to the protected
area. Integrated approach to the
management of the sacred grove and the
resources there-in is strongly
recommended.
References
Addai, G. and Baidoo, P.K (2013). The
effects of forest destruction on the
abundance, species richness and
diversity of butterflies in the
Bosomkese Forest Reserve, Brong
Ahafo Region, Ghana. Journal of
Applied Bioscience, 64: 4763-4772.
Aduse-Poku, K. and Doku-Marfo, E.
(2007). A rapid survey of butterflies
in the Atewa Range Forest Reserve,
Ghana. In: A Rapid Biological
Assessment of the Atewa Range
Forest Reserve, Easteren Ghana
(Eds J. McCullough, E.I ,Alonso, .P,
Naskrecki, E.H, Wright and Y, Osei-
Owusu) Conservation International
Arlington, V.A U.S.A.
Amusan, B. Ojianwuna, C., Kehinde, T.
and Akanbi, A. (2014). Butterfly
diversity in Obafemi Awolowo
University, Ile-Ife, Southwest
Nigeria. The Zoologist, 12: 1-7.
Bossart, J.L., Opuni-Firimpong, E.,
Kuudar, S. and Nkrumah, E. (2006)
Richness, abundance and
complementarities of fruit-feeding
butterfly species in relict sacred
forest reserves of Ghana.
Biodiversity and Conservation,
15:333-359.
CSIRO (2004). Butterflies of Australia.
Collecting and preserving adult
butterflies pp1-6
www.publish.csiro.au (assessed 14
th
January, 2017).
Food and Agricultural Organization
(FAO), (2011). State of the World’s
forest 2011. Food and Agricultural
Organization of the United Nations.
Gaude, K. and Janarthanam, G. (2015).
The butterfly (Insecta: Lepidoptera)
diversity of four sacred groves of
Goa, India. Journal of Threatened
Taxa, 7(12):7927-7932.
Ghazanfar, M.M., Faheem, M., Mubashar,
H., Razia, Iqbal and Misbah, Y.
(2016). Butterflies and their
contribution in ecosystem. Journal
of Entomology and Zoology Studies,
4(2):115-118.
Ghazoul, J. (2002). Impact of logging on
the richness and diversity of
Ethiopian Journal of Environmental Studies and Management Vol. 12 no.2 2019
165
butterflies in a Tropical Dry Forest
in Thailand. Biodiversity
Conservation, 11:521-541.
Global forest Resource Assessment
(FRA) (2010). Global forest
Resource Assessment 2010 Main
Report.
Hill, J.K., Hammer, K.C., Tangah, J. and
Dawood, M. (2001). Ecology of
tropical butterflies in rainforest
gaps. Oecologia 128: 294-302.
Janzer, D.H and Schoener T.W. (1968).
Difference in insect abundance and
diversity between wetter and drier
sites during a tropical dry season.
Ecology 49: 96-110.
Jothimani, K., Ramachandran, V.S. and
Rajendran. A (2014). Role of
Butterflies as Pollinators in
Maruthamalai Hills of Southern
Western Ghats, India. Academic
Journal of Entomology, 7(1):7-16.
Kurmar, P. and Murugesan, A.G. (2014).
Species diversity and habitat
association of butterflies around
30km radius of Kudankulam nuclear
power plant area of Tamil Nadu,
India. International Journal of
Biodiversity and Conservation,
6(8):608-615.
Larsen, T.B. (1994). Butterflies of Ghana
and their Implication for
Conservation and Susutainable Use
(Compiled for Ghana Wildlife
Department and IUCN) 44pp.
Larsen, T.B. (1995). Butterfly
Biodiversity and Conservation in
Afrotropical Region. Ecology and
Conservation of Butterflies, 290-303
Larsen, T.B (2005). Butterflies of West
Africa Apollo Books, 596pp.
Lodh, J.M. R and Agarwala, B.K (2012)
Variation Butterfly Diversity and
Unique Species richness along
different Habitats in Trishna
Wildlife Sanctuary, Tripura,
Northeast India. Checklist, 8(3):432-
436.
Lodh, J.M.R. and Agarwala, B.K. (2016).
Rapid assessment diversity and
conservation of butterflies in Rowa
Wildlife Sanctuary: An Indo-
Burmese Hotspot-Tripura, N.E.
India Tropical Ecology 57(2):231-
242.
Myers, N., Mittermeier, R.A.,
Mittermeier, C.G., Fonseca, G.A.B
and Kent, J. (2000) Biodiversity
Hotspots for Conservation Priorities.
Nature, 203:853-858.
Nair, A.V., Pradarsika, M. and Soma, A.
(2014). Studies on the diversity and
abundance of butterfly
(Lepidoptera: Rhopalocera) fauna in
and around Sarojini Naidu college
campus, Kolkata, West Bengal,
India. Journal of Entomology and
Zoology Studies, 2(4):129-134.
Nganso, B.T., Rosina, K. and Daniel, O.O.
(2012). Diversity and abundance of
butterfly species in the Abiriw and
Odumante Sacred Groves in the
Eastern Region of Ghana. Research
in Zoology, 2(5): 38-46.
Ogedegbe, A.B.O., Ogedegbe, A.U. and
Rotimi, J. (2014). Diversity of
Lepidopteran assemblages in five
Habitat types in the Niger Delta,
Nigeria. European International
Journal of Science and Technology,
3(8):45-57.
Ojianwuna, C.C (2015). Climatic
Variables as Factors affecting
Diversity and abundance of
butterflies in Okomu National Park.
Journal of Natural Science
research, 5(2):70-76.
Onyekwelu, J.C. and Olusola, J.A. (2014).
Role of Sacred groove in In-situ
biodiversity conservation in
A Survey of Butterfly Fauna in the Sacred Grove of Umuaja
Forest................Ojianwuna & Amusan
166
rainforest zone of South Western
Nigeria. Journal of Tropical Forest
Science, 26(1):5-15.
Perveen, F. and Fazal, F. (2013). Biology
and distribution of butterfly fauna of
Hazara University, Garden Campus,
Mansehra, Pakistan. Journal of
Animal Science, 3:28-36.
Perveen, F. and Khan, A.S. (2014).
Characteristics of butterfly
(Lepidoptera) fauna from Kabal,
Swat, Pakistan. Journal of
Entomology and Zoology Studies,
2(1):56-69.
Ramesh, T., Hussain K.J., Selvanayagam,
M., Satpathy. K. and Prasad, M.V.R.
(2010). Patterns of diversity,
abundance and habitat associations
of butterfly communities in
heterogeneous landscapes of the
Department of Atomic Energy
(DAE) Campus at Kalpakkam South
India. International Journal of
Biodiversity and Conservation, 2(4):
74-85.
Saikia, M.K. (2014). Diversity of tropical
butterflies in urban altered forest at
Gauhati University Campus,
Jalukbari, Assam. Journal of Global
Biosciences, 3(4):52-63.
Vu, L.V and Vu, C.Q (2011). Diversity
Pattern of Butterfly Communities
(Lepidoptera, Papilionidae) in
Different Habitat Types in a
Tropical Rain Forest of Southern
Vietnam. International Scholarly
Research Network, 2011:1-8
Widhiono, I. (2015). Diversity of
butterflies in four different forest
types in Mount Slamet, Central Java,
Indonasia. Biodiversitas, 16:196-
294.
Youdeowei, A. (1977). A Laboratory
Manual of Entomology. Oxford
University Press, Ibadan, Nigeria. 9-
10pp.
Zarim, A. and Ahmad, A.B. (2014).
Checklist of Butterfly Fauna at
Kuala Lompat, Krau Wildlife
Reserve, Pahang, Malaysia. Journal
of Wildlife and Parks, 28: 63-72.
Ethiopian Journal of Environmental Studies and Management Vol. 12 no.2 2019