ChapterPDF Available

English Foreign and Second Language Literacy Development for Chinese Speakers: What Do We Know?

Authors:

Abstract

This chapter provides a starting point for reflecting on what is important to understand second language (L2) or foreign language (FL) literacy instruction for Chinese speakers. The field of FL/L2 literacy is interdisciplinary in nature and is informed by research covering the fields of second language acquisition, reading research, writing research, bilingual processing, sociocultural factors, language assessment, critical language pedagogies, social semiotics, and language policies. With a focus on current innovative practices, this chapter conceptualizes English FL/L2 literacy development in primary, secondary, and higher education contexts and juxtaposes the similarities and differences in English FL/L2 literacy instruction in mainland China, Hong Kong, Macau, and Taiwan.
English Literacy
Instruction for
Chinese Speakers
Edited by
Barry Lee Reynolds · Mark Feng Teng
English Literacy Instruction for Chinese Speakers
Barry Lee Reynolds · Mark Feng Teng
Editors
English Literacy
Instruction for
Chinese Speakers
Editors
Barry Lee Reynolds
University of Macau
Taipa, Macau
Mark Feng Teng
Hong Kong Baptist University
Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong
ISBN 978-981-13-6652-9 ISBN 978-981-13-6653-6 (eBook)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6653-6
Library of Congress Control Number: 2019932936
© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2019
This work is subject to copyright. All rights are solely and exclusively licensed by the
Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specically the rights
of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction
on microlms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and
retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology
now known or hereafter developed.
The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this
publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specic statement, that such names are
exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.
The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and
information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication.
Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, expressed or implied,
with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have
been made. The publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published
maps and institutional afliations.
Cover credit: pablohart
This Palgrave Macmillan imprint is published by the registered company Springer Nature
Singapore Pte Ltd.
The registered company address is: 152 Beach Road, #21-01/04 Gateway East, Singapore
189721, Singapore
3
CHAPTER 1
English Foreign and Second Language
Literacy Development for Chinese Speakers:
What Do We Know?
Mark Feng Teng and Barry Lee Reynolds
INTRODUCTION
The twenty-rst century witnessed discussions of greater scope and
depth in the teaching and reform of English literacy. At rst glance,
“literacy,” referring to a skill in reading and/or writing, is easy to under-
stand. But at the same time, literacy is both a complex and dynamic
concept. Literacy is continuing to be interpreted and dened in a mul-
tiplicity of ways (Helman, 2016). The notion of literacy is inuenced by
not only institutional agendas, national contexts, educational policies,
and cultural values, but also inuenced by instruction, assessment, and
classroom practices. In teaching English as a second language (L2) or
a foreign language (FL), theories of literacy have evolved from those
© The Author(s) 2019
B. L. Reynolds and M. F. Teng (eds.),
English Literacy Instruction for Chinese Speakers,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6653-6_1
M. F. Teng
Hong Kong Baptist University, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong
e-mail: markteng@life.hkbu.edu.hk
B. L. Reynolds (*)
University of Macau, Taipa, Macau
e-mail: barryreynolds@um.edu.mo
4 M. F. TENG AND B. L. REYNOLDS
focused solely on changes in individual practices to more complex views
encompassing broader social contexts (the “literate environment” and
the “literate society”). These views encourage and enable literacy activi-
ties and practices to occur. As a result of these and other developments,
understandings in the policy and practices associated with literacy have
expanded. Literacy is no longer viewed as a simple process of acquiring
basic language skills. Instead, literacy also encompasses the development
of cognitive skills and the application of these skills in ways that contrib-
ute to socioeconomic development and critical reection as a basis for
personal and social change. Academics from a wide range of disciplines
have engaged in an ongoing and, at times, highly contested debate over
the meaning and denition of the term “literacy” and how it is related to
the broader notions of education and knowledge acquisition.
Following UNESCO (2006), literacy is delineated as including four
discrete elements: literacy as an autonomous set of skills (e.g., reading,
writing, and oral skills); literacy as an applied, practiced, and situated pro-
cess; literacy as a learning process; and literacy as text. However, as deni-
tions of literacy have shifted, literacy is no longer exclusively understood as
an individual transformation, but as a contextual and societal one. There
is a need to build an international awareness of a specic social context,
e.g., for rst language Chinese Speakers, in which literacy is encouraged,
acquired, developed, and sustained. “Chinese Speakers” is a term we use
to refer to English learners in mainland China, Hong Kong, Macau, and
Taiwan. The four geographic locations, although different, share con-
nected cultural and economic ties. A broader understanding of literacy
for Chinese Speakers can provide fertile ground for further research in the
four locations, as well as fostering an international awareness of innovation
and progress toward the development of effective English literacy pro-
grams for all rst language (L1) Chinese speakers across the world.
For Chinese Speakers, English has been an integral component of
school curricula. English literacy has been highlighted for academic pur-
suit and pragmatic needs of learners. The increasing reform in English
literacy instruction has brought about learning opportunities but also
posed challenges for learners who need to develop English literacy
skills. Researchers and classroom practitioners have paid continuous
effort to English curriculum reform at different levels. For example,
teaching and learning English literacy for Chinese Speakers tends to
draw on “the earlier, the better” ideology, suggesting that an early start
on English learning will enhance learners’ literacy skills. It is hoped that
1 ENGLISH FOREIGN AND SECOND LANGUAGE LITERACY DEVELOPMENT … 5
starting English instruction in primary school will bring more learning
opportunities to learners. To meet the needs of educational reform, new
syllabi have also been continuously issued to guide English teaching for
the secondary school level of education. The purpose of these rene-
ments is to address the changing situation of English language teach-
ing (ELT) and the higher demand for English literacy skills among
secondary school learners. In addition, literacy instruction in university
helps learners better prepare for the competitive job market after they
graduate.
However, policy-makers, school administrators, and ELT classroom
practitioners have doubted the effectiveness of English literacy instruc-
tion in China (Hu, 2005). Many challenges raised by researchers include
the lack of pedagogical innovations in language policy, the traditional
teacher-centered language instruction, and the lack of effective language
assessment methods. Many learners, having studied English for many
years, still could not read and write in English. The unsatisfactory out-
come made language educators reect on the existing curricula. An effec-
tive instruction mode for English literacy was also called for to address
public concerns and social needs. In addition, EFL/L2 literacy instruc-
tion research agendas for Chinese Speakers have become increasingly
cognizant of various learner needs. For example, EFL/L2 learners in
under-resourced communities may be academically vulnerable because of
their limited exposure to academically enriched environments, compared
to those learners in socioeconomically advantaged regions. As argued
by Ruan and Leung (2012), the provision of enhanced opportunities
to develop language literacy skills at an earlier age is one mechanism of
an EFL education setting. This has been shown to predict positive aca-
demic development among EFL learners from under-resourced commu-
nities. The development of language and/or literacy skills provides the
groundwork necessary for the success of English education. For these
reasons, English education researchers, practitioners, and policy-makers
have long been concerned with identifying and replicating high-quality
instructional practices that support the teaching and learning of English
literacy. These practices are particularly important for Chinese Speakers
as they not only constitute the largest EFL market in the world but also
are vulnerable learners who need literacy instruction for numerous rea-
sons. However, the region lacks a synthesis of research ndings related to
English literacy for various educational levels: pre-primary/primary, sec-
ondary, and tertiary levels of instruction.
6 M. F. TENG AND B. L. REYNOLDS
Therefore, we may need to rethink the practices for teaching English
literacy to EFL/L2 learners, e.g., the way we go about reading interven-
tions, teaching vocabulary, and writing assessment. English language lit-
eracy is traditionally thought of as the ability to read and write in English
to an appropriate level. However, in the modern age, literacy tends to
encompass more elements whilst increasing diversity and complexity.
Thus, teaching literacy must satisfy the needs of learners at various educa-
tional levels (ibid.). Concerning the denition of literacy, Mackey (2004)
argued that literacy has never been a set of xed skills and that it must
be dependent on the context. Meek (1991) described literacy as a part
of history, and literacy changes as societies change. Edwards and Potts
(2008) dened literacy not as a static and impersonal state, but rather
one which is individuated and enacted as social practice. In the case of
EFL/L2 settings, English literacy can be conceived as a set of actions
and transitions in which EFL/L2 learners are allowed to use reading
and writing for personal and social purposes. From this perspective, the
basic foundational skills in learning to be literate in English for EFL/
L2 learners are the skills to read and write in English in different situa-
tions for different purposes. In addition, EFL/L2 learners need to build
upon these skills for higher order thinking, cognitive awareness, negotiat-
ing meaning, adapting to conventions, and familiarizing themselves with
new discourses. Given that literacy is not a set of basic competences to be
taught and learned based on a pattern of instruction, there is a need to
explore current changes in English literacy practices and instruction.
Recent initiatives related to literacy have been undertaken. For exam-
ple, the National Matriculation English Test (NMET) reform in main-
land China, the “Biliterate and Trilingual” policy in Hong Kong, the role
of EFL as a subject and English as a medium of instruction (EMI) with
implementation of Taiwan’s 12-year basic education, and the “triliterate”
and “tetra-lingual” policy in Macau. Attention has been paid to practices,
instruction, and measuring levels of literacy and in the seriousness with
which the outcomes from curriculum reform are regarded. The process
of literacy development is complicated. This process requires an extensive
knowledge base and repertoire of strategies. While reading texts, learn-
ers need to overcome greater conceptual demands and barriers, gure
out more detailed graphics, and possess a greater ability to manipulate
and synthesize information across a broad array of text genres. A call for
reframing pedagogical practices for literacy instruction is not an ending
fad (Lems & Miller, 2017). Responding to this call, this book attempts
1 ENGLISH FOREIGN AND SECOND LANGUAGE LITERACY DEVELOPMENT … 7
to provide teachers with strategies and new ideas to enhance L2 literacy
development through a collection of studies targeted at pre-primary and
primary, secondary, and tertiary levels of education in mainland China,
Hong Kong, Macau, and Taiwan. The region and the learners from
this region deserve attention for a number of reasons. First, L1-Chinese
speakers are the largest group of English language learners around the
world. Second, along with this wide acceptance of the English language,
education policies for Chinese Speakers have further increased learners’
exposure to English through compulsory lessons at all stages of educa-
tion. Third, the introduction of EFL/L2 literacy is happening at an ever
increasingly earlier age, resulting in the need for ELT researchers and
practitioners to seek routes to enhance L2 literacy instruction at all levels
of education.
While it can be argued that much has already been written about L2
instruction at the tertiary level, the literature published has not directly
addressed the numerous issues related to L2 literacy instruction and
learning for other levels of education and the attention that has been
given to tertiary education has not been equally divided among the four
geographic locations. Given the limited research on the literacy develop-
ment of English language learners at all levels of education for Chinese
Speakers, this book is of great value for both academic and practical rea-
sons. In terms of academic reasons, rst, literacy provides a good foun-
dation for learning English in an L2 or EFL context. For example, when
L2/EFL students are literate in key literacy-related skills, including
phonological awareness, print concepts, decoding skills, and extended
discourse, they possess funds of knowledge about various aspects of read-
ing and writing, and this knowledge provides an experiential base for
furthering their English literacy development (McKenna & Robinson,
2013). Second, the ability to acquire literacy skills is the core of lifelong
learning. That means students need literacy to enable lifelong learn-
ing. For example, our knowledge environment changes fast and higher
education today is much more in the mode of providing basic informa-
tion literacy along with the skills needed to pursue lifelong learning and
keep up with our changing world (Crawford & Irving, 2013). In other
words, obtaining basic English reading and writing skills allows learners
to locate and apply the right information for the right purpose through-
out life. In terms of practical reasons, there is little doubt that the study
of English is extremely popular with Chinese Speakers. The teaching and
learning of English in Hong Kong and Macau occupy a high position.
8 M. F. TENG AND B. L. REYNOLDS
Language schools are also increasingly ourishing in mainland China and
Taiwan. Furthermore, the time has come to discuss ways of supporting
ELT practitioners in bridging the gap between literacy instruction during
the early years to those of higher and adult education.
However, discussing how to develop an effective approach to lan-
guage teaching should not be undertaken lightly and will surely pose
future challenges. It has been compared to a muscle that needs the
constant constraining discipline of exercise to strengthen individuals’
innovative thinking and problem-solving. In this case, we need to con-
sider ways of diffusing good practice, and perhaps most important of
all, ways of integrating modern approaches across the curriculum and
across institutions so that professional innovation can inuence L2 liter-
acy instruction for Chinese Speakers. This includes critical issues in the
teaching of basic literacy skills, e.g., reading and writing, covering the
pre-primary, primary, secondary, and tertiary levels of education. Thus,
this edited volume provides suggestions for helping learners at all levels
of prociency and academic levels. This volume is a practical resource
designed to help English language educators incorporate literacy- related
approaches into their content classrooms by applying a core set of
instructional techniques that are evidence-based. Drawing upon studies
in different contexts, this book provides an up-to-date outlook which
focuses on teaching literacy skills to L2/FL learners. Each chapter is
contextualized and hands-on, featuring:
Critical discussion of basic literacy skills, e.g., reading and/or
writing;
Practical tips, ideas, and suggestions which teachers can adapt/
adopt for L2 literacy instruction, practices, and assessment;
Primary research relevant to school teachers (either pre-primary/
primary-level, secondary-level, or tertiary-level teachers); and
Easily applied principles and techniques.
Literacy, traditionally dened as reading and writing, is often
regarded as a simple notion. However, it opens up a world of complex-
ity in modern society. Still, there is no up-to-date general agreement
on the denition of literacy. With a focus on L2/EFL literacy, we may
conceptualize literacy as the development of literacy skills for L2/EFL
learners in terms of reading, writing, assessment, and word building,
1 ENGLISH FOREIGN AND SECOND LANGUAGE LITERACY DEVELOPMENT … 9
which in a deep way may affect both the substance and style of educa-
tional programs. From a functionalist perspective, a focus should also
be placed on teaching skills that learners need for complex demands
of a changing technological and economic environment. However,
literacy also goes beyond basic skills and includes a capacity of higher
order thinking, even some discernment for practical language use. In
addition, literacy should be benecial for learners’ personal growth.
This advocates for inclusion of enjoyable reading and writing materials,
and other ways to engage learners who are not procient in English to
ready them for independent lifelong learning through the English lan-
guage. This requires language educators and policy-makers to approach
literacy in a new way. In particular, we need to consider critical literacy,
a type of literacy which needs a critical consciousness of the social con-
ditions in which learners nd themselves. Finally, literacy is constructed
through three ways: adaptation (for real-world survival), power (cul-
tural and economic advancement), and a state of grace (self-knowing)
(Donehower, Hogg, & Schell, 2011).
According to UNESCO (2008), one who is literate is a learner who
can read and write a short simple statement on his or her everyday life.
The UNESCO denition of literacy is problematic for English language
learners, particularly those EFL/L2 learners who require extensive sup-
port because they often do not read and write in conventional ways as
L1 English speakers. From our perspective, literacy for EFL/L2 learn-
ers is required for effective functioning in their learning community and
also for enabling them to continue to use reading and writing for their
own and their community’s further development. We argue that literacy
is highly dependent on the context of the learner’s community. Thus,
we may need a specic focus, where different methods and practices
in mainland China, Hong Kong, Macau, and Taiwan may inform each
other. In doing so, we have aimed for the book to be balanced in terms
of geographical distribution (mainland China, Hong Kong, Macau, and
Taiwan) as well as learning context (pre-primary/primary, secondary,
tertiary).
To address critical issues in EFL/L2 literacy, we need to provide an
interface between applied linguists and ELT practitioners—to provide a
link between theory and pedagogical practice. The utility of skill-based lit-
eracy for EFL/L2 students with an extensive need for support has been
challenged over the past two decades. With each section of the book,
10 M. F. TENG AND B. L. REYNOLDS
there is a focus on pre-primary/primary, secondary, higher education, and
policy for all four geographic locations: mainland China, Hong Kong,
Macau, and Taiwan. This book will provide a systematic and comprehen-
sive overview of the critical issues in teaching and learning literacy for all
four of the geographic locations. The book goes beyond providing support
on how to aid learners in reading and writing a second language but also
delves into what it means for learners to be literate in a second or a foreign
language. While previous studies have been conducted on the four geo-
graphic locations—mainland China, Hong Kong, Macau, and Taiwan—
previous research has not discussed and compared the four regions in an
integrated way. This book serves as our attempt to do just that.
This book is of practical interest to language teachers, language
teacher educators, EFL/L2 classroom practitioners, and English educa-
tion researchers in search of new teaching ideas, techniques, and liter-
acy practices. Additionally, this book will also provide insight for future
researchers and scholars as a reference for conducting literacy research
with Chinese Speakers, as well as in similar contexts.
OVERVIEW OF THE VOLUME
As is evident in EFL/L2 literacy research, reading and writing is
impossible to separate. To be literate necessitates and supports a good
level of reading and writing, not one or the other. The work in this
volume brings together the effort of scholars whose goal is to improve
learners’ reading and writing, as well as basic skills. The instruc-
tion practices that are discussed in the chapters can support concep-
tual learning and aid learners in the comprehension of various text
genres. We have organized this body of research into four sections
that can help readers of the book—for example, those responsible
for educational policy and practice at primary, secondary, and ter-
tiary levels—frame policies and practices related to EFL/L2 literacy
development.
Part I the introduction and Part VI the conclusion serve as book-
ends to the four main parts of the volume. Upon reading the two chap-
ters, readers will understand an overview of what literacy is and why it
is important, along with being introduced to some critical issues related
to English literacy teaching and learning targeting Chinese Speakers.
Recommendations are also provided for teachers and teacher trainers to
deepen their understanding of literacy and to facilitate planning effective
English literacy instruction for Chinese Speakers.
1 ENGLISH FOREIGN AND SECOND LANGUAGE LITERACY DEVELOPMENT … 11
Part II focuses on English literacy instruction for the pre-and primary
school levels. Teaching English to young learners is different from adult
learners (Teng, 2019). Topics in this section include the development of
a school-based reading program, measuring the vocabulary knowledge of
young English learners, literacy instruction through stories, songs, and
games, employing tailor-made learning materials, and investigating how a
government-funded award scheme on instructional design affects primary
school students’ literacy development. We can see that although initiatives
were made to improve literacy instruction, developing English literacy
skills for pre- and primary school students was challenging. The chapters
in this section show that English literacy skills can be developed through
extensive reading programs, stories, songs, games as well as creating con-
tent and language integrated learning (CLIL) materials or through gov-
ernment-funded initiatives. These chapters show how English teachers
can tap into students’ understanding of reading and vocabulary strategies
to help learners make meaning of texts, and vocabulary knowledge can be
enhanced through young learner reading programs.
Part III focuses on English literacy instruction for secondary school
students. The topics cover formulaic language, spaced multi-draft com-
posing and feedback, evolution of writing assessments, critical thinking
skills, the use of English as a lingua franca, and critical issues in teaching
reading. While the topics in this section are varied, the insights gained
for literacy instruction are focal. Secondary school students already have
acquired English learning experiences. However, there is a need to max-
imize on these learning experiences while catering to their diverse needs
and abilities. Doing so will prepare them for their future academic studies.
Research in this section supports that secondary school students learn by
doing and literacy activities are acquired through meaningful participation.
More specically, enhancement of literacy skills requires practice of those
skills: Secondary school learners need to participate in vocabulary (e.g.,
formulaic language and lexicon), reading, and writing activities (e.g., feed-
back). While developing English literacy skills through language practice
is important, learners and educators alike still have some tough issues to
consider. Genuine dialog among stakeholders are vital for internalizing
assessment for learning and assessment as learning. The research reported
in this section of the book also highlights the need of secondary school
students to begin the practice of becoming reective learners. Educators
and learners alike must acknowledge the effects of English having become
a lingua franca in the global community and how critical thinking must
start to take a central focus in secondary school classrooms.
12 M. F. TENG AND B. L. REYNOLDS
Part IV focuses on literacy development for university students. Topics
include critical language awareness and intercultural literacy, innovating
writing instruction, focused feedback, writing assessment, and assign-
ment design. Academic literacy in university contexts has been the focus
of numerous investigations for years. However, the outcome is not as
expected because Chinese-speaking university students entering the
university context lack sufcient English prociency to take advantage of
language learning practices, e.g., feedback, assessment, and project-based
assignments, to cope with different reading and writing activities required
in the higher education context. Literacy in academic reading and writ-
ing requires students to be competent readers and writers of different aca-
demic genres. This process involves students’ intercultural awareness, for
which teaching English should be recognized as a global lingua franca.
Part V focuses on literacy development from the perspective of pol-
icy in different regions. Policy-makers nowadays exert much more inu-
ence over English literacy practice than ever before. The four chapters in
this section show that literacy development is related to policy- makers’
interests and is inuenced by the political decisions of the government.
Policies that have been implemented indicate that expectations have
been high, carrying the assumption that students’ English literacy can
be enhanced. However, in practice, there is a gap between policy and
outcomes. We can still notice some asymmetries in agenda-setting and
in forms of accountability. We need to value all stakeholders’ opinions,
but we also need to listen especially to frontline teachers’ and students’
voices. Research supports that more effort and support from local and
national governments and education ministries or bureaus are needed to
achieve the desired outcomes outlined by regional policy.
Concluding this volume in Part VI with the topic of developing
EFL/L2 literacy demonstrates that a substantial amount of research
continues to be needed. By the same token, as is evident in the chap-
ters in this book, much is known about the need for reading and writing
instruction and the features of such instruction. However, the develop-
ment of EFL/L2 literacy, as discussed in this book, is not only related to
reading and writing, but also students’ vocabulary, thinking skills, inter-
cultural literacy, and language policy. If a higher level of English literacy
is to be achieved, then EFL/L2 literacy instruction and practice requires
intensive and extensive attention. Recommendations for future English
literacy studies and EFL/L2 literacy development are presented in the
concluding chapter.
1 ENGLISH FOREIGN AND SECOND LANGUAGE LITERACY DEVELOPMENT … 13
REFERENCES
Crawford, J., & Irving, C. (2013). Information literacy and lifelong learning.
Cambridge: Chandos Publishing.
Donehower, K., Hogg, C., & Schell, E. (2011). Reclaiming the rural: Essays
on literacy, rhetoric, and pedagogy. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University
Press.
Edwards, D., & Potts, A. (2008). What is literacy? Thirty years of Australian lit-
eracy debates (1975–2005). Paedagogica Historica: International Journal of
the History of Education, 44(1–2), 123–135.
Helman, L. (2016). Literacy development with English learners: Research-based
instruction in grades K-6 (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Hu, G. (2005). English language education in China: Policies, progress, and
problems. Language Policy, 4, 5–24.
Lems, K., Miller, D., & Soro, T. (2017). Building literacy with English language
learners: Insights from linguistics (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.
Mackey, M. (2004). Playing the text. In T. Grainger (Ed.), The RoutledgeFalmer
reader in language and literacy (pp. 236–252). New York: Routledge.
McKenna, M. C., & Robinson, R. D. (2013). Teaching through text: Reading
and writing in the content areas (2nd ed.). London: Pearson.
Meek, M. (1991). On being literate. London: Bodley Head.
Ruan, J., & Leung, C. (Eds.). (2012). Perspectives on teaching and learning
English literacy in China. Dordrecht: Springer.
Teng, F. (2019). The benets of metacognitive reading strategy awareness
instruction for young learners of English as a second language. Literacy.
UNESCO. (2006). Understandings of literacy. Retrieved from http://www.une-
sco.org/education/GMR2006/full/chapt6_eng.pdf.
UNESCO Institute for Statistics. (2008). International literacy statistics:
A review of concepts, methodology, and current data. Montreal, Canada:
UNESCO Institute for Statistics.
... This problem may be more emergent today, as teaching writing is commonly product-and exam-oriented in today"s educational systems (Teng & Reynolds, 2019). ...
... Previous studies reported that L2 writing self-regulated strategies play a facilitative role for successful L2 writing (e.g., Teng and Zhang, 2016;Teng and Reynolds, 2019;Teng et al., 2022), and are closely linked to how L2 writers monitor their performance and adjust their tasks to achieve success (Zimmerman, 2001;Han and Hiver, 2018). A meta-analysis by Santangelo et al. (2016) also demonstrated that the use of writing self-regulated strategies contributed significantly to the improvement of students' writing performance. ...
Article
Full-text available
This study used a structural equation modeling approach to investigate the relationships among L2 writing anxiety, L2 writing self-efficacy, L2 writing self-regulated strategies and L2 writing engagement, and possible mediators that regulate the effect of individual factors. A questionnaire was administered to 340 Chinese high school students from different parts of the country. The results of the study suggested a negative relationship between L2 writing anxiety and L2 writing self-efficacy, and a direct effect of both on L2 writing engagement. While a higher level of L2 writing self-efficacy indicated a lower level of L2 writing anxiety and more students’ L2 writing engagement, L2 writing efficacy had a much stronger direct effect on L2 writing engagement than L2 writing anxiety. In addition, L2 writing self-regulated strategies were found to play a mediating role between L2 writing self-efficacy and L2 writing engagement, but not between L2 writing anxiety and L2 writing engagement. This study helps to understand the interplay of individual factors related to L2 writing and sheds light on promoting English writing abilities of Chinese high school students.
... In addition, student writers have unique strategy repertoires for learning to write (Palermo & Thomson, 2018) and often possess different levels of "self-initiated thoughts, feelings, and actions" when pursuing writing goals (Zimmerman & Risemberg, 1997, p. 76). This problem may be more emergent today, as teaching writing is commonly product-and exam-oriented in Chinese secondary schools (Teng & Reynolds, 2019). Compared to students who cannot "transform their mental abilities into academic skills" due to a lack of "self-awareness, self-motivation, and behavioral skill" (Zimmerman, 2002, pp. ...
Article
Full-text available
This paper reports findings from two empirical studies on students' reported use of self-regulatory writing strategies and the relationships with their writing performance in a secondary school English as a foreign language (EFL) context. Study One adopted a factorial design using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis to validate the inferences and uses of a Self-Regulatory Writing Strategy Questionnaire; Study Two explored learner individual differences in developing self-regulatory writing strategies and the predictive effects of these strategies on students' writing performance. Participants were two convenience samples of 669 and 239 students, who were young EFL learners in junior secondary schools in China. Results provided evidence of the construct validity of responses to the questionnaire. Students in higher grade levels reported more frequent use of self-regulatory writing strategies than those in lower grade levels, and female students reported using self-regulatory writing strategies more than male students. The six strategy factors (i.e., writing planning, goal-oriented monitoring, goal-oriented evaluation, emotional control, memorization, and metacognitive judgment) each had significant predictive effects on secondary school students' writing performance. These findings suggest the importance of self-regulatory writing strategies to young learners' writing performance.
... Given a prominent need to increase writing accountability and boost productivity as successful student writers, ESL learners have been categorized as a group of learners who exhibit deficits in self-regulating their writing process and struggle to demonstrate achievement-related gains in writing (Pinter, 2017). As ESL learners endeavor to meet writing requirements, their lack of selfregulation presents an additional hurdle to their progress (Teng & Reynolds, 2019). Most classroom-based research to date has addressed the need to foster development of learners' self-regulated writing strategies (Teng, 2016;Teng, 2019aTeng, , 2019bTeng, , 2019c. ...
Article
This study examined the effects of adding collaborative modeling of text structure as an additional component of self-regulated strategy development for elementary school 6th-grade students learning English as a second language (ESL). In this study, 34 students receiving a ‘Self-regulated strategy development plus collaborative modeling of text structure’ intervention were compared with 36 students receiving a ‘collaborative modeling of text structure only’ intervention, 38 students receiving a ‘self-regulated strategy development only’ intervention, and 36 students receiving traditional instruction. Several measures (i.e., content comprehension, summarization of main ideas, and essay writing) were administered after the one-month intervention. Results revealed that, compared to traditional instruction, self-regulated strategy development and collaborative modeling of text structure respectively resulted in better comprehension levels and writing performance. The combination of self-regulated strategy development and collaborative modeling of text structure was particularly effective in increasing primary school students’ content comprehension and writing quality. These findings highlight the benefit of coupling self-regulated strategy development and collaborative modeling of text structure for elementary school ESL classroom instruction.
Article
Reward and punishment are basic concepts in psychology. To survive better, humans and animals often need to maximize rewards and minimize punishments and threats. The human brain makes judgments about rewards and punishments based on distinguishing among complex environmental factors and makes decisions about future actions accordingly. Chinese students have spent more than a decade of primary and secondary school education with purposeful, fine-grained time management learning with the goal of success on the college entrance exam (Gaokao). The relationship between rewards and punishments for literacy tutoring at the primary and secondary school levels and the decision-making behavior of students and parents is therefore a question worth exploring. The purpose of this paper is to explore the decision-making mechanisms of elite Chinese students’ participation in or withdrawal from literacy tutoring in Chinese and the factors behind the reward and punishment mechanisms through grounded method analysis. The results show that most elite students and their parents do not believe that language literacy tutoring will significantly improve their chances for better college entrance exam scores, but there is a complex relationship between their decision-making behavior in tutoring and the reward and punishment mechanisms. Literacy improvement, emotional values, parent-child support obligations and even face-saving culture all contribute to students’ and parents’ decision-making behaviors. Choosing tutoring that is not seen as likely to improve test scores is a common phenomenon, which suggests that the punishment itself provides the reward that drives decisions to pursue literacy tutoring.
Article
Full-text available
This paper presents a small‐scale study examining the effects of metacognitive reading strategy instruction on English language learners' reading comprehension in a Hong Kong international school. Twenty‐five primary school (Grade 5) students who learn English as a second language participated in this study. Metacognitive instruction was incorporated into 10 process‐based reading lessons. Data were collected from notes learners took during reading, post‐reading reflection reports, teacher‐facilitated group discussions and two types of reading tests. Results revealed that the young learners could articulate several knowledge factors that influenced their reading. In addition, learners reported a better understanding of the nature and demands of reading, a deeper awareness of metacognitive knowledge in improving reading comprehension and increased confidence in handling reading exercises. The learners also showed enhanced reading performance compared to those in a control group without metacognitive intervention. This study highlights the potential of metacognitive instruction to enhance primary school English learners' reading literacy.
Article
Full-text available
English language education has been accorded much importance in the Peoples Republic of China in the last quarter century. This paper presents an overview of basic English language education in the Chinese education system. It is intended to serve two purposes: (1) to provide background information for situating and interpreting the findings reported by Silver and Skuja-Steele in this issue and (2) to survey progress and problems in the development of basic English language education in China. The paper is structured in three parts. The first part examines national policies on the expansion of English provision in basic education since the late 1970s. The second part focuses on policy efforts directed towards improving the quality of English instruction. The last part sketches the major progress that has been made and identifies several thorny issues in English language education that deserve serious attention from policymakers.
Book
Lems, Miller, and Soro recently released the second edition of their book, Building Literacy with English Language Learners: Insights from Linguistics (Guilford, 2017). The book's premise is that language educators need to have a solid background in linguistics in order to understand the ways in which children acquire and learn languages and literacy. When educators understand how children develop and use language skills through the lens of linguistics, they can make better decisions about instruction and planning. Kay concepts include the importance and continuum of oracy (the listening and speaking domains), the role of orthography in learning to read and write, how morphemes help build vocabulary, comprehension strategies, differences between learning to read in a first language versus a second language, and a new chapter about changes to literacy and language learning in the age of the digital revolution. The book, used in graduate programs for inservice and preservice teachers, fills a vital role in helping educators combine their knowledge of second language acquisition and linguistics with literacy development in order to activate the potential of English language learners they teach.
Book
In Reclaiming the Rural: Essays on Literacy, Rhetoric,and Pedagogy, editors Kim Donehower, Charlotte Hogg, and Eileen E. Schell bring together a diverse collection of essays that consider literacy, rhetoric, and pedagogy in the United States, Canada, and Mexico. The essays move beyond the typical arguments for preserving, abandoning, or modernizing by analyzing how rural communities sustain themselves through literate action. The contributors explore the rhetorics of water disputes in the western United States, the histories and influences of religious rhetorics in Mexico, agricultural and rural literacy curricula, the literacies of organizations such as 4-H and Academia de la Nueva Raza, and neoliberal rhetorics. Central to these examinations are the rural populations themselves, which include indigenous peoples in the rural United States, Canada, and Mexico, as well as those of European or other backgrounds. The strength of the anthology lies in its multiple perspectives, various research sites, and the range of methodologies employed, including rhetorical analyses of economies and environments, media, and public spaces; classroom-based research; historical analysis and archival work; and qualitative research. The researchers engage the duality between the practices of everyday life in rural communities and the practices of reflecting on and making meaning. Reclaiming the Rural reflects the continually changing, nuanced, context-dependent realities of rural life while acknowledging the complex histories, power struggles, and governmental actions that have affected and continue to affect the lives of rural citizens. This thought-provoking collection demonstrates the value in reclaiming the rural for scholarly and pedagogical analysis. Copyright © 2012 by the Board of Trustees, Southern Illinois University. All rights reserved.
Article
his book reviews the role of information literacy (IL) in developing employability skills, personal health management and informal learning from a variety of areas including: information policy issues, information usage and training needs and skills development. Early years education, lifelong learning and the role of IL in relevant organisations, including government departments, skills agencies, and professional bodies will also be considered. With a UK focus, this book also considers the leading role of the US in the development of information literacy policy. Case studies and examples of good practise are included and discussed, drawn primarily from Europe, North America and Australasia, also identified examples from other countries. Looks at value and impact and discusses policymaking and issues for the future.
Article
Australia is a federation of six states and two territories. Each state and territory has its own legislature, which may not be of the same political persuasion as the Commonwealth (Federal) Government. Under the Australian Constitution primary control of school education is with the State and Territory Governments, with the Australian Commonwealth Government having no specific constitutional responsibility for school education. However, this is complicated by a dual-tiered funding system, whereby the Australian Commonwealth Government has responsibility for some funding of government schools and majority funding for non-government schools. Since 1975 there have been moves by the Commonwealth Ministers for Education to acquire a significant role in identifying national priorities for education and constructing policies and assessment tools to achieve such goals. Financial provision and national policy formation have increasingly become the means by which Australian Commonwealth Ministers for Education have "shaped" educational debates and policies. In November 2004 the then Australian Commonwealth Minister for Education, Science and Training announced the details of the Australian Government National Inquiry into the Teaching of Literacy. The focus of the Inquiry was examination of research into reading, preparation of schoolteachers and literacy teaching practices, especially reading. The Inquiry may be seen as the latest move by the Commonwealth Government to influence the teaching of literacy in Australia. In this paper official notions of literacy, as outlined through the various Australian Commonwealth Government's inquiries into literacy and national policy documents for the period 1975-2005, are examined using metaphor analysis. Metaphor analysis provides a means of analysing discourses about literacy in each of the reports and policies in order to interpret the underlying ideology. These official constructs of literacy are briefly considered within the competing and wider notions of literacy in Australia academic debates and the tensions that exist in defining literacy. Why did the Australian Commonwealth Government become involved in the literacy debates during this time? In particular, how has the Australian Commonwealth Government defined literacy and why did it take a more controlling role in both the definition of literacy and the shaping of education for literacy? The reasons for the Australian Commonwealth Government becoming involved in the literacy debates remain largely unresolved. In this paper it is proposed that involvement in the literacy debates constituted a way for the Commonwealth Government, in a time of economic rationalisation, to change their role in educational reform from one of financial assistance to one of leadership in curriculum. It is also proposed that a metaphor analysis of the policy documents and associated reports indicates a move from a wide definition of literacy to an increasingly narrow and utilitarian definition of literacy, reflecting the predominantly economic focus of the Australian Commonwealth Government.
Teaching through text: Reading and writing in the content areas
  • M C Mckenna
  • R D Robinson
  • MC McKenna
McKenna, M. C., & Robinson, R. D. (2013). Teaching through text: Reading and writing in the content areas (2nd ed.). London: Pearson.
Literacy development with English learners: Research-based instruction in grades K-6
  • L Helman
Helman, L. (2016). Literacy development with English learners: Research-based instruction in grades K-6 (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Understandings of literacy
UNESCO. (2006). Understandings of literacy. Retrieved from http://www.unesco.org/education/GMR2006/full/chapt6_eng.pdf.
The RoutledgeFalmer reader in language and literacy
  • M Mackey
Mackey, M. (2004). Playing the text. In T. Grainger (Ed.), The RoutledgeFalmer reader in language and literacy (pp. 236-252). New York: Routledge.