- A preview of this full-text is provided by Springer Nature.
- Learn more
Preview content only
Content available from Clinical Oral Investigations
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Histomorphometricalassessmentofverticalalveolarridge
augmentation using extracted tooth roots in the canine
Puria Parvini
1
&Carla Schliephake
1
&Sarah Al-Maawi
2
&Katrin Schwarz
3
&Robert Sader
2
&Shahram Ghanaati
2
&
Frank Schwarz
1,3
Received: 4 February 2019 /Accepted: 9 May 2019 / Published online: 17 May 2019
#Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019
Abstract
Objectives To histomorphometrically evaluate the influence of autoclavation on the efficacy of extracted tooth roots (TR) used
for vertical alveolar ridge augmentation.
Materials and methods Upper premolars were randomly assigned to either autoclavation (TR-A) or an untreated control group
(TR-C) and used as block grafts for vertical alveolar ridge augmentation in both lower quadrants (n= 4 beagle dogs). Tissue
biopsies were obtained after 15 weeks of submerged healing. Histological analyses considered gain in ridge height (GRH),
augmented area (AA), and the proportion of mineralized (MT) and non-mineralized tissue (NMT).
Results TR-C and TR-A grafts were commonly associated with a complete replacement resorption and a marked gain in ridge
height. Significant differencesbetween groups were noted for mean GRH [TR-C: 2.35 ± 0.55 vs. TR-A: 2.46 ± 0.21 mm] and AA
[TR-C: 11.88 ± 4.31 vs. TR-A: 8.65 ± 1.59 mm
2
] values. Within AA, both groups revealed a comparable distribution of mean
MT and NMT values. The linear regression analysis pointed to a significant correlation between NMT and AA values.
Conclusions Both TR-C and TR-A grafts supported vertical alveolar ridge augmentation; however, GRH was improved in the
TR-A group.
Clinical relevance TR grafts may serve as a potential alternative for vertical alveolar ridge augmentation.
Keywords Animal experiment .Alveolar ridge augmentation .Tooth tr ansplan ta tion .Histological technique
Introduction
The regeneration of alveolar ridge defects to allow for a prosthet-
ically driven implant placement is a frequently used approach in
contemporary dentistry. These procedures mainly encompass lat-
eral and vertical bone augmentation as well as sinus grafting.
While their overall efficacy in treating alveolar ridge/subantral
bone deficiencies and supporting implant survival was reported
to be high, there were also distinct differences noted among the
procedures with regards to associated complications [1–3]. In
particular, vertical grafting procedures were reported to be asso-
ciated with a weighted mean complication rate of 16.9%, mainly
including graft/membrane exposures, postoperative infections,
and loss of graft material [1].
A recent series of preclinical studies performed in a canine
model have demonstrated that extracted tooth roots (TR) may
be successfully used as an alternative autograft for lateral al-
veolar ridge augmentation and two-stage implant placement
[4,5]. TR were separated from either healthy, endodontically
treated, or periodontally infected premolars and histologically
involved in a replacement resorption, thus resulting in a com-
parable gain in ridge width as autogenous cortical bone blocks
(AB) [4–7]. These results were recently confirmed in a pro-
spective controlled clinical study, reporting on a mean lateral
gain of 10.06 ± 1.85 mm (median: 11.0) in the TR and 9.20 ±
2.09 mm (median: 8.50) in the AB group, respectively. Even
though these differences did not reach statistical significance,
the TR group was associated with a significantly lower
amount of graft resorption than the AB group [8]. The latter
*Frank Schwarz
f.schwarz@med.uni-frankfurt.de
1
Department of Oral Surgery and Implantology, Carolinum, Goethe
University, Frankfurt, Germany
2
Department for Oral, Cranio-Maxillofacial and Facial Plastic
Surgery, Medical Center of the Goethe University Frankfurt,
Frankfurt am Main, Germany
3
Department of Oral Surgery, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf,
Düsseldorf, Germany
Clinical Oral Investigations (2020) 24:317–323
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-019-02960-7
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.