ArticlePDF Available

Inter-agency Collaboration for Graduate Employment Opportunities in Uganda: a Case for Investigating the Structure, Social Capital, and Agency of Organizations

Authors:

Abstract

Africa’s population has grown from 477 million in 1980 to 1.25 billion people by 2017. Whereas this is expected to double to 2.4 billion people by 2050, there is uncertainty over the continent’s preparedness to provide opportunities for its youthful population (Hilson and McQuilken, The Extractive Industries and Society 1:104–118, 2014). Efforts by different stakeholders to create employment opportunities have been largely unsuccessful. Rae (Journal of General Management, 40:79–95, 2014) attributes this failure to the autonomous and individualistic actions of different agencies in executing their mandates. In doing this, they compete and conflict against each other which discourages efforts towards job creation. Taking cognizance of this anomaly, this paper urges research into the structure, social capital, and agency of organizations with the view to suggest ways of promoting the kind and level of collaboration that is desired among the organizations. The paper starts with an introduction, the context of graduate unemployment in Uganda, discusses the efforts of different agencies, a bit of literature review, the theoretical underpinnings, knowledge gap, a case study and what Uganda’s organizations learn from the Urban Partnership Program, and finally the conclusion.
CORRECTION
Correction to: Inter-agency Collaboration for Graduate
Employment Opportunities in Uganda: a Case
for Investigating the Structure, Social Capital,
and Agency of Organizations
Peter Dithan Ntale
1
&Jude Ssempebwa
2
&Badiru Musisi
2
&Holly C. Pope
3
#Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019
Correction to: Journal of African American Studies
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12111-019-09419-9
The original version of this article contained an error. Three authors were previously
missing in the author byline.
The correct author list is shown above.
The original article has been corrected.
With reference to the above correction, the Acknowledgements section of the original
version will now read:
Acknowledgments I acknowledge the contribution of Dr. Genza Gyaviira Musoke and Assoc. Prof. Ngoma
Muhammed. They have been valuable resources in the development of this work.
Publishers Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and
institutional affiliations.
Journal of African American Studies
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12111-019-09429-7
The online version of the original article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1007/s12111-019-09419-9
*Peter Dithan Ntale
pntale@mubs.ac.ug
1
Makerere University Business School, PO Box 1337, Kampala, Uganda
2
College of Education and External Studies, Makerere University, PO Box 7062, Kampala, Uganda
3
Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA
... The jobs in all these organizations were described in a way that allowed employees to concentrate on their work and mindful of the different organizational layers. The job description restricted communication within and outside the organization and only preserved this privilege to the top management (Ntale et al. 2019). There were rules and regulations to enforce discipline in all the 3 organizations. ...
Article
Full-text available
The complexity of global challenges requires that organizations collaborate with one another. To do this, stakeholders need flexible structures that are designed in a way that allows organizations to collaborate. However, it is not known whether Uganda’s organizations are structured in a way that allows them to collaborate with one another, casting doubt as to whether they can manage the complexity of global challenges such as graduate unemployment. Informed by Hage and Aiken (1967), we studied the structures of selected organizations in Uganda and found out that their major components, i.e., centralization and formalization, are designed in a way that may not allow collaboration to occur. We found out that the organizational structures were exclusive in decision-making, had high power distance (HPD), jobs were strictly codified, and organizations enforced stringent rule observation. These gaps make it difficult for people interaction and involvement and deny them of their freedom to relate with one another, making it difficult for a collaboration between different agencies to occur. To enhance organizational collaboration, it is recommended that organizations should be restructured to become more inclusive, interactive, and democratic since organizations structured in this way have shown collaboration success and greater achievement of society needs.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any references for this publication.