Content uploaded by Somia Essa Sharawi
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Somia Essa Sharawi on Jul 21, 2019
Content may be subject to copyright.
ISSN: 0975-8585
January – February 2019 RJPBCS 10(1) Page No. 600
Research Journal of Pharmaceutical, Biological and Chemical
Sciences
Laboratory Evaluation of Toxicity of Boric Acid and Borax against American
cockroaches (Periplaneta americana L.) in Jeddah Governorate.
Somia, E Sharawi1, Jazem A Mahyoub1,2*, and Ahma I Assagaf1.
1Department of Biology Sciences, Faculty of Sciences, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
2IBB University, Ibb, Republic of Yemen.
ABSTRACT
Periplaneta americana is an important insect in medicine, and they have been generally known as
domestic pest, and they are found in or around homesand buildings. Because their way of living, P. americana
has a critical role in transmission of infectious diseasese and known as vector for numerous pathogens.
Therefore, a strong require to control this pest with a low coast and non-harmful insecticides to human and
the environment. In this study, the natural products of boric acid and borax were evaluated against adults and
nymphs of P. americana by feeding and contact toxicity methods after 48h. of exposure. The results showed
that borax were more effective than boric acid by LC 50 and LC90 values when used by contact toxicity method
against adults than nymphs. The present study revealed that boraxhave great potential for control against
adults and nymphs of P. Americana and it can be used as a safety insecticide in Jeddah governorate.
Keywords: Insecticides, boric acid, borax, P. americana, toxicity, nymphs, adults
*Corresponding author
ISSN: 0975-8585
January – February 2019 RJPBCS 10(1) Page No. 601
INTRODUCTION
American cockroaches (Periplanetaamericana) (Linnaeus), order Dictyoptera, is an important insects
in medicine [1] and they have been generally known as domestic pest and they are found in or around homes
and buildings [2].Out of 500, only 30 species are considered as household pest [3]. They survive in warm
weather with high moisture conditions as well as in unfavorable environments for humans [4]. Because their
way of living, P. americana has a critical role in transmission of infectious diseasese and known as vector for
numerous pathogens[5].P. americana can spread bacteria, fungi, and other pathogenic microorganisms from
infected areas [6], and cause allergies to human [7]. They play important role in the transmission of different
diseases by mechanical as well as by biological ways [8]. P. americana spends most of its time in sewage, sewer
pipe which usually contains high density of pathogens [9]. Also, they feed on garbage, and they have large
opportunities to disseminate human pathogen [10]. In addition, their nocturnal and filthy habits of eating their
feces make them ideal carriers of numerous pathogenic microbes [11]. A numerous pathogen such as bacteria,
fungi and molds, helminths, protozoans and viruses, harmful to humans being are carried by cockroaches, and
they present in their feces [12]. More than 40 pathogenic and non-pathogenic bacterial species have been
identified from cockroaches. Such as Actinomycesrandingae, Alcaligenesfaecalis, Arthrobactercumminnsii,
Aureubacteriumspp., Bacillus spp.,[13]. Many parasites were isolated from cockroaches e.g., cysts of
Entomoebahystolitica, oocysts of Cryptosporidium parvum, Cyclosporacayetanensis [14]. A number of fungal
species have been also isolated from both the external body parts as well as fecal of cockroaches such as
Candida spp., Rhodotrula spp., Aspergillus spp., Fusarium spp., Penicillin spp. and Geotrichum spp. [15].
Helminths have also been reported in cockroaches collected from different areas [16], included
Strongyloidesstercoralis, Ascarislumbricoides, Trichuris trichina and Taniaspp [17]. Protozoa types that were
identified from cockroaches included Cyclospora spp., Endolimax nana, Blastocystishominis, Isospora belli,
Entamoebahistolytica, Cryptosporidium spp., [17].
Chemical control of P. americana has been the most popular and effective method so far [18], but
their control as insecticides is not a suitable because of several reasons; the most important of which is that
they may develop resistance against certain frequently used insecticides [19].Non-conventional insecticides
were used against P. americana exhibited a high efficiency in controlling the insect pest [20].
Natural products such as borax and boric acid are natural materials, and they are both contain the
element boron. Usually, Borax is mined and refined from tourmaline, kernite and colemanite. In general, the
two materials act the same and in theory, can control pests [21]. Boric acid has a long history as an insecticide
in pest management, and it has been shown to be an effective alternative to conventional neurotoxic
insecticides. Several borate-sugar combinations were evaluated in choice and no-choice assays in the
laboratory. [22], showed that boric acid can be effective against cockroaches.
Much of the work regarding insecticidal efficacy has been done on German cockroaches, however,
very little data is available about the effect of boric acid and borax against P.americana adults and nymphs in
Jeddah governorate. Therefore, keeping in view the work carried out by various researchers, the present work
was designed to investigate the insecticidal efficacy of boric acid and borax and the susceptibility of adults and
nymphs to these insecticides through laboratory bioassay using feeding and contact toxicity methods.
MATERIALS AND METHOD
Experimental site
The laboratory bioassay were conducted at the Dengue Mosquito Experimental Station (DMES),
belonging to the Department of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Sciences, King Abdul-Aziz University, Jeddah,
Saudi Arabia.
Experimental insect
P. americana was collected from dark and damp places (sewers) from different areas in Jeddah
province by using food jars surrounded by dark cloth as a trap [23]. The strains were stored in the lab and used
in this study. Traps were placed into main sewers. Cockroaches were collected every two days and placed in
ISSN: 0975-8585
January – February 2019 RJPBCS 10(1) Page No. 602
glass containers (30 × 60 × 30 cm). Then, they were thus kept under the laboratory condition of 25 ± 3 °C and
75 ± 5 % RH.
Chemicals
Boric acid and borax insecticides were used during bioassay against P. americana adult and nymphs.
The choice of these insecticides was based on the fact that those chemicals have not been tested against
different stages of P. americana in Jeddah governorate so far and their low coast. All chemicals were obtained
from AL- ShafeiMedica & Scientific Equipment. Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Feeding and contact toxicity bioassay of boric acid and borax were used in this study and different
concentrations were used against adults and nymphs after 48h. of exposure periods.
Feeding bioassay
Feeding bioassay was done according to [24], with some modifications against adults and nymphs. For
the present study, Bait was improvised in the laboratory. Feeding bioassays were conducted with lab strains
using previous plastic boxes coated with petroleum jelly 2 cm from the inside top to prevent the cockroaches
from escaping. 1gm of white floor, 1gm of powder milk, 1gm of sugar were prepared manually and treated
with different concentrations of insecticides and appropriate amount of water to make semisolid bait. A single
pellet was large enough to be entirely eaten by adults or nymphs starved for 24 h. Treated pellets were dried
in a fume hood for 15-20 min. A single pellet was then provided to adults and nymphs held in approximately 3-
4 gm. Control insects received treated pellets only with water. Each replicate consisted of 30 insects and three
replicates for each concentration. Mortality was assessed after 48 h.
Contact toxicity bioassay
Contact toxicity bioassay was done according to [25], with some modifications against adults and
nymphs. Contact toxicity mixture was improvised in the laboratory. Contact bioassays were conducted with
previous method. Liquid mixture was then conducting by spraying different concentrations of the insecticide
from inside plastic box and make sure that the insecticide covered all the sides. Three plastic boxes with 30
cockroaches (adults and nymphs) were used for each concentration.
Statistical analysis
This study was completely randomized design (CRD) in a factorial experiment. The data were
statistically analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA), and means were compared by LSD at P ≤ 0.05 SAS
software program. LC50 and LC90 were calculated according to Probit analysis program [26].
RESULTS
Mortality of adults and nymphs resulted after feeding bioassay with boric acid was summarized in
Table (1) after 48 h. of exposure. Mortality percentage were highly increased by increasing concentrations at
all exposure intervals for adults and nymphs. After 48 h.,boric acid gave level of mortality to adults and
nymphs (10.00, 33.33%) at concentrations (0.1%), and after 42 h., for adults and nymphs. In the susceptibility
level of nymphs and adults of P.americana after 48 h. of continuous exposure to residue of boric acid, figure
(1) illustrated that the nymphs were more sensitive to boric acid by LC50 values (0.131 %) than adults (0.541%).
Contact toxicity bioassay of boric acid was resulted also in table (1), and the results shows that low
concentrations exhibited high mortality to adults and nymphs (73.33 %) after 48 h. between concentrations of
(0.03-0.5 %). The susceptibility level of adults and nymphs of P.americana after 48 h. of continuous exposure
to residue of boric acid are illustrated in figure (2). The nymphs were more sensitive to boric acid by LC50's
values (0.103%) followed by adults (0.117 %) after 48 h. of exposure.
For feeding bioassay with borax, mortality percentage were highly increased by increasing
concentrations at all exposure intervals for adults and nymphs as in table (2). After 48 h. borax gave level of
mortality between 23.33 and 90.00 %between the concentrations 0.005 and 1 % for adults and mortality
between 46.66 and 96.66 % between the concentrations of 0.001 and 0.1 for nymphs after 48 h. Figure (3)
ISSN: 0975-8585
January – February 2019 RJPBCS 10(1) Page No. 603
illustrated that the nymphs were more sensitive to borax by LC50 values (0.0.006 %) than adults (0.034 %). For
contact toxicity of Borax, was recorded also in table (2) and figure (4). There was positive correlation between
mortality of borax concentrations and exposure intervals.
Fig 1: Comparison between the susceptibility of P.americana adults and nymphs against boric acid using
feeding and contact toxicity method after 48h. using LDP line program
Fig 2: Comparison between the susceptibility of P.americana adults and nymphs against borax using feeding
and contact toxicity method after 48h. using LDP line program
ISSN: 0975-8585
January – February 2019 RJPBCS 10(1) Page No. 604
Fig 3: Comparison between the susceptibility of P.americana adults and nymphs against boric acid and borax
using feeding method after 48h. using LDP line program
Fig 4: Comparison between the susceptibility of P.americana adults and nymphs against boric acid and borax
using contact toxicty method after 48h. using LDP line program
Table 1: Susceptibility adults and nymphs of P.americana to boric acid using feeding and contact toxicity
methods after 48h.
Treatment
Parameters
Con.
(%)
Mortality
(%)
LC50
(L-U)
LC90
(L-U)
X 2*
Slope
Adult /
Feeding
0.1 – 20.0
23.33 - 96.66
0.541
(0.397-
0.707)
9.848
(6.919-15.36)
5.243
1.017
Adult /
Contact
0.03 – 0.5
26.66 – 73.33
0.117
(0.087-
0.157)
2.844
(1.376-9.764)
2.75
0.925
Nymph /
Feeding
0.05 – 3.0
30.00 – 96.66
0.131
(0.097-
0.170)
1.683
(1.190-2.653)
5.461
1.158
Nymph /
Contact
0.01 – 0.5
20.00 – 90.00
0.103
(0.070-
0.161)
2.836
(1.185-
12.937)
2.425
0.8921
LC50=lethal concentration that kill 50% of the treated insects, LC90= lethal concentration that kill 90% of the
treated insects, U: upper limit, L: lower limit,
* X2= Calculated Chi square, tabulated Chi2= 7.8
When tabulated (Chi)2 larger than calculated at 0.05 level of significance indicates the homogeneity of results.
ISSN: 0975-8585
January – February 2019 RJPBCS 10(1) Page No. 605
Table 2: Susceptibility adults and nymphs of P.americana to borax using feeding and contact toxicity
methods after 48h.
Treatment
Parameters
Con.
(%)
Mortality
(%)
LC50
(L-U)
LC90
(L-U)
X 2*
Slope
Adult /
Feeding
0.005 – 1.00
23.33 – 90.00
0.034
(0.025-0.046)
1.087
(0.655-2.137)
0.380
0.855
Adult /
Contact
0.001 – 0.5
20.00 – 96.66
0.0088
(0.0065-
0.0117)
0.207
(0.1365-
0.3516)
2.344
0.935
Nymph /
Feeding
0.001 – 0.1
30.00 – 93.33
0.0063
0.1974
12.60
0.856
Nymph /
Contact
0.001 – 0.1
46.66 – 96.66
0.0014
(0.0007-
0.0022)
0.050
(0.0313-
0.0971)
2.397
0.820
LC50=lethal concentration that kill 50% of the treated insects, LC90= lethal concentration that kill 90% of the
treated insects, U: upper limit, L: lower limit,
* X2= Calculated Chi square, tabulated Chi2= 7.8
When tabulated (Chi)2 larger than calculated at 0.05 level of significance indicates the homogeneity of results.
DISCUSSION
In search of the best low cost, efficient and non-toxic insecticide for controlling P.americana, a
number of experiments were carried out here. In this study P.americana was treated with boric acid and borax.
This study reveals interesting comparisons between boric acid and borax for controlling adults and nymphs of
P.americana. Natural products such as borax and boric acid are origin insecticides with limited or no adverse
effects on the environment or beneficial organisms or low risk insecticides Mohamedet al., 2014. In general,
the two materials act the same and in theory, can control pests [21].In our study, different concentrations of
boric acid and borax were used against adults and nymphs of P.americana after 48 h., of exposure by feeding
and contact toxicity methods. Data from this study explain that the toxicity of borax showed high mortality
than boric acid again adults and nymphs of P.americana by contact method than feeding one. It is difficult to
explain this results, but it might be because of the humidity of the environment which effect on the mode of
action of borax when use it by contact toxicity method. However, much of the work has been done on boric
acid, and very little data is available about the effect of borax on cockroaches. In both treatments, mortality
increased by increasing the concentrations. Similar results were obtained by[28] who have reported that
increasing concentrations of boric acid were toxic to P. americana and mortality percentage increased in a
positive correlation with concentration. Agree with our results, [28], found that sprays and liquid baits
insecticides are effective in controlling cockroaches, and they work efficiently and even a very small amount.
This is in agreement with [27], who used boric acid in liquid bait which effectively killed cockroaches. Studied
conducted by[23] who have reported that boric acid can be used for the control of cockroaches. [29], reported
that boric acid acts as a stomach poison affecting the insects' metabolism and the dry powder affects the
exoskeleton cuticle and when ingested boric acid it causes structural alterations in the mid-gut of cockroach. In
another study, [30]showed that there was a synergistic interaction between boric acid and
Metarhiziumanisopliae, and they killed cockroaches significantly faster than without boric acid.
CONCLUSIONS
In the light of above mentioned finding, it can be suggested that boric acid can be used against
different stages of P. americana at all localities of populations in Jeddah governorate, because it is an effective
and low coast inorganic insecticide, with safety use to the human and the environment.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
ISSN: 0975-8585
January – February 2019 RJPBCS 10(1) Page No. 606
The authors express their sincere gratitude to the Dengue Mosquito Experimental Station (DMES),
belonging to the Department of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Sciences, King Abdul-Aziz University, Jeddah,
Saudi Arabia for providing necessary equipments and their nice cooperating throughout the research period.
REFERENCES
[1] Akbari O S, Hugo J B, Ethan B, Simon L B, Austin B, George M C, Kevin R C, Peter DOR, Edwards KM,
Esvelt VM, Gantz KG, Golic SJ, Gratz MM, Harrison KR, Hayes AA, James TC, Kaufman JK, Harmit SM,
Kathy A, Matthews KM, O'Connor-Giles AL, Parks NP, Fillip P, Steven R, Ryu U, Jill W. BIOSAFETY.
Safeguarding gene drive experiments in the laboratory. Science. 2015; 349: 927-29.
[2] Chii-Huei W, Mey-Fann L. Molecular Characteristics of Cockroach Allergens. Cellular & Molecular
Immunology. 2005; 2(3):177-180.
[3] Chung HS, Yu TH, Kim BJ, Kim SM, Kim JY, Yu HS, Jeong HJ, Ock MS. Expressed sequence tags analysis of
Blattella germanica. Korean J Parasitol. 2005; 43:149–156.
[4] Jaramillo-Ramirez GI, Cárdenas-Henao H, González-Obando R, Rosero-Galindo CY. Genetic variability of
five Periplaneta americana L. (Dyctioptera: Blattidae) populations in southwestern Colombia using the
AFLP molecular marker technique. Neotrop Entomol. 2010; 39: 371-378.
[5] Ifeanyi O, Ogundipe OO. Microbiology of Cockroaches – A Public Health Concern 2015.
[6] Czajka E, Pancer K, Kochman M, Gliniewicz A, Sawicka B, Rabczenko D, Stypulkowska- Misiurewicz H.
Characteristics of bacteria isolated from body surface of German cockroaches caught in hospitals.
Przegl. Epidemiol. 2013; 57: 655-662.
[7] Kinfu A, Erko B. Cockroaches as carriers of human intestinal parasites in two localities in Ethiopia.Trans
R Soc Trop Med. Hyg. 2008; 102: 1143–1147.
[8] Kim I, Lee JH, Subramaniyam S, Yun E, Kim I. De Novo Transcriptome Analysis and Detection of
Antimicrobial Peptides of the American Cockroach Periplaneta americana (Linnaeus) PLoS One. 2016;
11.5.
[9] Basseri HR, Amir DK, Ronak B, Mandan A, Reza HB. Isolation and Purification of an Antibacterial Protein
from Immune Induced Haemolymph of American Cockroach, Periplaneta americana. Journal of
arthropod-borne diseases. 2016; 10: 519-27.
[10] Pai HH, Chen WC, Peng CF. Isolation of bacteria with antibiotic resistance from household cockroaches
(Periplaneta americana and Blatella germanica). Acta Tropica. 2005; 93: 259-265.
[11] Allen BW. Excretion of viable tubercle bacilli by Blatta orientalis (the oriental cockroach) following
ingestion of heat-fixed sputum smears: a laboratory investigation. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1987;
81: 98-99.
[12] Allotey J, Mpuchane S, Gashe BA, Simpanya M, Matsheka I. Trapping of Blattella germanica (L)
populations in human dwellings in Gaborone, Botswana. J Appl Zoo Res.2009; 20(2): 175–188.
[13] Mpuchane S, Allotey J, Matsheka I, Simpanya M, Coetzee S, Jordaan, AMN, . Gashe BA. Carriage of
micro-organisms by domestic cockroaches and implications on food safety. Int. J. Trop. Insect Sci. 2006;
26: 166-175.
[14] Adeleke MA, Akatah HA, Hassan AWO, Adebimp WO. Microbial load and multiple drug resistance of
pathogenic bacteria isolated from faeces and body surfaces in an urban area of southwestern. J
Microbiol Biotechnol Food Sci. 2012; 1:1448–1461.
[15] Motevali HSF, Aghili S, Gholami Sh, Salmanian B, Nikokar SH, Khangolzadeh GM, Hajati H. Isolation of
medically importantfungi from cockroaches trapped at hospitals of Sari, Iran. Bulletin of Environment,
Pharmacology and Life Sciences. 2014; 3: 2 9 - 36.
[16] Etim SE, Okon OE, Akpan PA, Ukpong GI, Oku EE. Prevalence of cockroaches (Periplanata americana) in
households in Calabar: public health implications. J Public Health Epidemiol. 2013; 5:149–152.
[17] Chamavit P, Panupong S, Nunthawadee N. The majority of cockroaches from the Samutprakarn
province of Thailand are carriers of parasitic organisms. EXCLI journal. 2011; 10: 218-22.
[18] Lee CY, Robinson W. Handbook of Malaysian Household and Structural Pests. Pest Control Association
of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. 2001; 96–108.
[19] Tsai C, Lee H. Analysis of specific adaptation to a domicile habitat: A comparative study of two closely
related cockroach species. J Med Entomol. 2001; 38: 245–252.
[20] Khattak BA, Khattak G, Mahmood Z, Bibi N, Ihsanullah I. Study of selected quality and agronomic
characteristics and their interrelationship in Kabuli‐type chickpea genotypes (Cicer arietinum L.).
International Journal of Food Science & Technology. 2006; 41:1 - 5.
ISSN: 0975-8585
January – February 2019 RJPBCS 10(1) Page No. 607
[21] See SA, Abu BS, Bakar F, Yusof N, Abdulamir A, heng L. Risk and Health Effect of Boric Acid. American
Journal of Applied Sciences.2010; 7(5): 620-627.
[22] Chad GJ, Schal C. Laboratory Evaluation of Boric Acid-Sugar Solutions as Baits for Management of
German Cockroach Infestations. J. Econ. Entomol. 2004; 97(2): 581-587.
[23] Wang C, Bennett GW. Comparative study of integrated pest management and baiting for German
cockroach management in public housing', J Econ Entomol. 2006; 99: 879-85.
[24] Gondhalekar AD, Scharf ME. Preventing resistance to bait products. 2013; 42-46.
[25] Ling Y, Fan GX, Long LP. Determinationon susceptibility of different Sogatella furcifera populations to
insecticides in different areas of Guangxi.Guangxi Agric. Sci. 2009; 40: 847-849.
[26] Finney DJ. Probit Analysis: A Statistical Treatment of the Sigmoid Response Curve. 7th Edition,
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 1972; 33.
[27] Gore JC, Schal C. Laboratory evaluation of boric acid-sugar solutions as baits for management of
German cockroach infestations. J Econ Entomol. 2004; 97(2): 581-587.
[28] Mohamed HAE, Mohamed A, Elrabaa F, Baleela R. Control of Periplaneta Americana using Boric Acid &
Neem Tree leaflets powder. Sudan Journal of Science. 2014; 1.
[29] Habes D, Kilani-Morakchi S, Aribi N, Farine JP, Soltani N. Boric acid toxicity to the German cockroach,
Blattella germanica : Alterations in midgut structure, and acethylcholinesterase and gluthatione S-
transferase activity. Pest. Biochem. Physiol.2006; 84: 17-24.
[30] Zurek L, Gore JC, Stringham SM, Watson DW, Waldvogel M, Schal C. Boric Acid Dust as a Component of
an Integrated Cockroach Management Program in Confined Swine Production.J Econ Entomol. 2003;
96(4):1362-6.