ArticlePDF Available

Social support in the education of patients with cardiovascular diseases: the situation in the Czech Republic

journal homepage:
DOI: 10.32725/kont.2019.028
Social support in the education of patients with
cardiovascular diseases: the situation in the Czech Republic
Lenka Šedová 1 *, Valérie Tóthová 1, Věra Olišarová 1, Sylva Bártlová 1, Ivana Chloubová 1,
Helena Michálková 1, Marie Trešlová 1, Radka Prokešová 2, Kristýna Toumová 1, Věra Adámková 3
1 University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Institute of Nursing, Midwifery, and Emergency Care,
České Budějovice, Czech Republic
2 University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Institute of the Humanities in Nursing Professions,
České Budějovice, Czech Republic
3 Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Preventive Cardiology Department, Prague, Czech Republic
e incidence of cardiovascular disease is linked to the risk factors of lifestyle. Traditional inuences are smoking, diet, physical activity
and psychosocial factors. Psychosocial factors include low socio-economic status, lack of social support, work-related stress and the state
or type of family life, depression and anxiety, and hostility.
e aim of this study was to demonstrate the connection of the views on selected psychosocial factors of cardiovascular diseases with
selected sociodemographic characteristics. A quantitative method using quantitative interviews was used to achieve the objectives. In
total, 1,992 persons aged 40 years and older were addressed. e set was representative of age, gender, and residence. e information
obtained was subjected to statistical analysis and the rate of dependence was assessed by the chi-2 test, the t-test and the analysis of the
e results show that in prevention the doctors are focused on obtaining information about the employment of their patients, the
patient’s lifestyle and how the diagnosed cardiovascular disease aects the normal life of patients. Less often, in practice, questions
on socio-economic factors are found. In most questions, there was a signicant link with age, employment and family status. Positive
questions were more often answered by respondents over the age of 60, widowed respondents and respondents in disability or retirement
age. is may be related to targeted interventions for these vulnerable groups of patients. For most respondents, the family is a foothold
of lifestyle change.
Keywords: Cardiovascular; Disease; Factors; Patient; Psychosocial; Support
* Author for correspondence: Lenka Šedová, University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences,
Institute of Nursing, Midwifery and Emergency Care, U Výstaviště 26, 370 05 České Budějovice, Czech Republic;
Submitted: 2018-08-15 • Accepted: 2019-01-31 • Prepublished online: 2019-04-29
KONTAKT 21/x: xxx–xxx • EISSN 1804-7122 • ISSN 1212-4117
© 2019 The Authors. Published by University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences.
This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license.
Original research article
Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are included among the most
frequent diseases of civilization (Gielen et al., 2015). In Eu-
rope, the mortality due to cardiovascular diseases is dierent
in the EU and the countries outside of it (Wilkins et al., 2017).
In the Czech Republic, they are the main cause of death. e to-
tal standardized mortality was 42% in 2016 (ÚZIS ČR, 2016).
Despite the dierences in the clinical symptoms of these dis-
eases, they share the same cause, which is atherosclerosis. Ath-
erosclerosis is a degenerative illness of the arteries. e causes
of atherosclerosis are multifactorial and closely related to life-
style (Piepoli et al., 2016; Puska et al., 2011). Mortality due to
chronic cardiovascular diseases has decreased in the last ten
years but the prevalence is still high (Cífková et al., 2010). e
incidence of cardiovascular diseases is related to age but it can
be etiologically related to other diseases, such as obesity and
sleep apnoea syndrome etc. (Slouka et al., 2018a).
e statistics of the Institute of Health Information and
Statistics of the Czech Republic show that the number of sick
days due to diagnosed CVD increases from 40 years of age, and
most sick days are found in people between 60 and 64 and 65+
(ÚZIS ČR, 2016). Cardiovascular diseases and those patho-
physiologically related to them are a serious public health
problem and an economic burden for society and its healthcare
system (Piepoli et al., 2016).
Psychosocial factors became considered health aecting
after the relationship between stress and health was found
(Solgajová et al., 2015). Contemporarily, we do not question
the hypotheses on the relationship between health and low
socioeconomic status (SES). People with lower SES are more
frequently stressed, which is negatively reected on the health
condition (Callander and McDermott, 2017; Labarthe, 2010).
One example is the research of the authors Kajanová et al.
(2016), who learned that socially excluded people have a sig-
nicantly lower overall quality of life (as well as lower physical
and mental health). Another example is the study of Slouka
KONTAKT / Journal of nursing and social sciences related to health and illness
Šedová et al. / KONTAKT
et al. (2018b), which conrms a more frequent incidence of
larynx cancer in people with lower socioeconomic status and
unsuitable life habits.
More than 50 years ago, the rst evidence of the signi-
cance of psychosocial risk factors appeared regarding the in-
cidence of cardiovascular diseases. e related factors speci-
cally include low socioeconomic status, lack of social support,
low health literacy, work stress and family life, depression
and anxiety, and hostility (Bruthans et al., 2016; Compare et
al., 2013; Slouka et al., 2018a). For example, according to the
study of Kabátová et al. (2014), depression and bad mood are
related to the incidence of chronic illnesses. e respondents
most frequently showed cardiovascular diseases.
ese factors contribute to the incidence of cardiac ischem-
ic disease and worsen the prognosis for patients with coronary
artery disease. ey are the factors that aect the incidence of
coronary cardiac diseases and can be an obstacle in managing
and following the treatment of these diseases (de Mestral and
Stringhini, 2017; Töres et al., 2015).
e relationship between unfavourable work conditions
and the incidence of CVD has been studied for decades. e
mechanisms of the incidence are still unclear and the explan-
atory theories include direct activations of neuroendocrine
reactions to stressors; indirect factors include unhealthy be-
haviour – smoking, inactivity, obesity or the overconsumption
of alcohol (Kivimäki and Kawachi, 2015; Slouka et al., 2018a).
e psychosocial factors also include the level of social
support. Social support, which is received from other people,
groups and wider society, can aect the way patients manage
dicult situations such as illnesses. Social support can be di-
vided into emotional, evaluating, informational and instru-
mental (Albus, 2010).
e treatment of CVD is not only carried out with medica-
ments. e non-medicament part of the treatment also plays
an important and complex role (Doležal and Jarošová, 2015).
is complex treatment includes the bio-psycho-social view of
a patient. e anamnesis of psychosocial factors aecting car-
diovascular health should become a common part of clinical
practice. Learned information should be assessed consider-
ing the individual dierences of every patient (Slouka et al.,
2018b). An individualized approach in treatment oers mul-
timodal interventions which can include a number of other
experts, such as nutritional therapists, physiotherapists, psy-
chologists (Albus and Hermann-Lingen, 2015; Buford et al.,
2015; Schwarzer, 2008).
In this study, we focused on discovering patients’ opinions
on selected psychosocial factors which are related to the inci-
dence and development of CVD. We wanted to prove the rela-
tionship between the questions regarding psychosocial factors
and the selected sociodemographic factors of the sample group.
We focused on nding out about the patients’ socioeco-
nomic status as well as their employment. We also focused on
questions regarding the impact of lifestyle changes on the pa-
tient’s life and who supports the changes.
Materials and methods
We used the combination of a non-standardized questionnaire
and the standardized SF-36 questionnaire. e non-standard-
ized questionnaire was designed to assess education. We used
it to monitor the education from the point of view of people.
We also wanted to estimate how long the health education
lasted and to describe the extent and content of the education
including barriers.
e eld research was carried out using the technique of
standardized conducted interview between an interviewer and
a respondent (face-to-face). e nal form of the interview-
er’s sheet was based on the pre-research results. e research
was anonymous, the participation was voluntary and it did not
contain any controversial ethical questions.
e data collection was carried out in 2016. It was secured
by 582 professional interviewers from the Institute for the
Study of Health and Lifestyle in the Czech Republic.
e statistical processing of the data was carried out us-
ing the SASD 1.4.12 (Statistical Analysis of Social Data) pro-
gramme and SPSS. We processed the 1st classication degree
and the contingency tables of the selected indicators of the
2nd classication degree. In the 1st classication degree, cal-
culations of absolute and relative numbers were carried out,
as well as the modus, median, average, variance and standard
deviation. For every indicator, we carried out the calculation of
the variance, standard deviation, margin and interval estimate
of the average value 0.05 and the interval variance estimate
0.05. For the calculation of the level of dependence of selected
indicators, we calculated the Wallis–Spearman and correlation
coecient. We also applied the chi-2 of good concordance,
where we applied the Yates correction in case of an insucient
number of monitorings. We nally calculated the test of in-
dependence on the level of signicance α = 0.05; α = 0.01; α =
We addressed 2,306 respondents, of which 314 (13.6%)
refused to be included in the study. 1,992 respondents aged
40 and above agreed to the interview. e parameters of the
sample group were based on the data from the Czech Statis-
tical Oce from the 31st December 2014. e sample group
consisted of people from the Czech Republic and its structure
responded to the following criteria: all regions, age and gender.
ese indicators were set as representative.
e sample group included 937 men (47%) and 1,055 (53%)
women, which responds to the analogue structure of the peo-
ple in the Czech Republic over 40 years. e sample group in-
cluded the lowest number of respondents over 70 (Table 1).
Table 1. e structure of the sample group by gender and
Men Women
40–49 years 284 14.3 275 13.8
50–59 years 242 12.1 245 12.3
60–69 years 237 11.9 270 13.6
70–79 years 126 6.3 167 8.4
80 years and above 48 2.4 98 4.9
Total 937 47 1,055 53.0
162 (8.1%) respondents had basic education, 735 (36.9%)
had apprenticeship certicate, 680 (34.1%) had secondary
education, 103 (5.2%) had higher vocational education and
312 (15.7%) had a university education. e majority of the
respondents were married (1,167; 60.1%), 129 (6.5%) were
single, 256 (12.9%) were divorced, 101 (5.1%) respondents
lived in a partnership and 309 (15.5%) respondents were wid-
Šedová et al. / KONTAKT
owed. e majority of the respondents were employees (965;
48.4%), 211 (10.6%) ran a business, 674 (33.8%) were retired,
92 (4.6%) drew an disability pension and 38 (1.9%) were un-
employed for more than 6 months. 12 (0.6%) chose the option
“other employment”.
47.1% were treated for cardiovascular disease. Most fre-
quently, they were 50 years old with hypertension, vascular
diseases of lower limbs or the condition after heart attack.
e respondents were asked who they saw as the greatest
support in the change of their lifestyle. ey were oered 6 op-
tions – doctor; nurse; friends; family; other patients and somebody
else. e respondents gave numbers to every option: 1 = the
largest support, and 6 = the smallest support.
e comparison of average values shows that the largest
support is family. A doctor is in second place, friends are in
third place, and a nurse is in fourth place. Other patients had
the smallest inuence. Regarding doctors, there was a greater
variability of responses. e smallest was related to other pa-
tients (who were in fth place) (Table2).
Regarding the assessment of the signicance of individual
subjects as a support in the change of lifestyle, doctors were in
the 1st (29.3%) and 3rd place (24.5%).
50.0% of the respondents put family in 1st place. 21.8%
put it in 2nd place and 15.3% put it in 3rd place. is fact and
the comparison of the average values enable the conclusion that the
respondents consider family to be the most important support re-
garding the change in their lifestyle (Table 2).
e assessment of family as the support for change in lifestyle
is signicantly related to education (P < 0.05). e respondents
with basic education and higher vocational education attached
signicantly lesser importance to the support in the change of
lifestyle. Statistically signicant connections to other sociode-
mographic indicators were not identied.
Another question was focused on the patients’ opinion
about their interest in selected psychosocial factors in medical
practice. e results are shown in Chart 1.
e results show that the respondents say that doctors are
interested in their patients’ employment and whether their
job is physically or psychologically demanding (67.5%). e
results of the statistical signicance show that doctors’ inter-
est in the eect of their patients’ job on their lifestyle is sig-
nicantly related to the patient’s gender, age, education and
job. Women more frequently chose a positive response to this
question (p < 0.01), the younger ones (40–59 years) more fre-
quently agreed with the statement (p < 0.01), and so did the
employed respondents (p < 0.001).
Table 2. Support in the lifestyle change – comparison of
average values; N = 1992 (in %)
Support Modus Median s2S
Doctor 1 2 2.591 1.890 1.375
Nurse 4 4 3.503 1.582 1.258
Friends 2 3 2.830 1.380 1.175
Family 1 1 1.977 1.528 1.236
Other patients 5 5 4.590 1.203 1.097
= arithmetic average; s2 = variance; S = standard deviation.
Doctors are less interested in their patients’ socioeconomic
situation. 53.7% of the respondents chose a negative response
to this question. is question showed a signicant relation-
ship with the respondents’ employment (p < 0.001). e em-
ployed respondents responded negatively; disabled pensioners
and the unemployed responded more positively.
e respondents positively assessed the interest of doctors
in their patients’ lifestyle (58.7%) and the way their illness
aected their life (58.8%). We identied a statistically signif-
icant relationship between the question of the interest in a
patient’s lifestyle and gender (p < 0.05), age (p < 0.001) and
employment (p < 0.01). Women and the respondents between
40 and 59 years more frequently chose the negative response.
Meanwhile, older respondents more frequently chose a posi-
tive response. We also identied a statistically signicant re-
lationship regarding employment. e employed respondents
more frequently responded negatively, in contrast to pension-
ers who more frequently responded positively. e analysis of
the question of how the illness aected the patient’s life is sig-
nicantly related to age (p < 0.001), employment (p < 0.001),
and education (p < 0.001). e relationship to age shows that
younger respondents (40–59 years) more frequently do not
agree with the statement, while older respondents agree with
it. e respondents with a lower level of education (basic, ap-
prenticeship) more frequently responded positively. Second-
ary school and university graduates mostly chose “I do not
know”. e result shows that a doctor is interested in their pa-
tients’ present lifestyle if they are familiar with their patient’s
job. e employed respondents more frequently chose a neg-
ative response, while pensioners agreed with the statement.
44.8% of the respondents chose a positive response to the
question of whether doctors had records on their progress in
Chart 1. Doctors’ interest in the factors that aect the changes in a lifestyle
Recording the progress
Interest in aecting the life of the ill
Interest in a patient’s lifestyle
Interest in a patient’s socioeconomic situation
Interest in a patient’s job
0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0%
Interest in
a patient’s
Interest in a patient’s
Interest in
a patient’s
Interest in
aecting the life
of the ill
the progress
67.5% 20.6% 58.7% 58.8% 44.8%
changing their lifestyle. More than 1/3 of the respondents did
not know of any records. Here as well, we identied the rela-
tionships to age (p < 0.001), education (p < 0.05) and employ-
ment (p < 0.001). Older respondents, along with those with a
lower level of education and pensioners were more frequently
positive regarding this question.
e goal of this study was to analyze the level of the selected
psychosocial factors, which should be a part of the medical his-
tory of patients with cardiovascular diseases. We tried to nd
the relationship between the respondents’ opinions and the
selected sociodemographic characteristics.
Psychosocial factors aect the incidence and development
of CVD. e consideration of psychosocial factors enables an
individualized approach in a complex treatment. As stated by
Albus et al. (2015), one alternative for how to achieve a com-
plex treatment in a patient with ischemic cardiac disease is
oering multimodal interventions, which are based on the in-
uence of other experts, such as nutritional therapists, physi-
otherapists or psychologists.
ese days, there is a lot of evidence on the causality of
the incidence of cardiovascular diseases and inuenceable risk
factors. In common practice, the behavioural factors of these
diseases are not given sucient attention with regard to the
fact that these factors are not a part of common scoring sys-
tems for the estimation of cardiovascular diseases.
Psychosocial factors are a part of cardio-prevention despite
the fact that the causal eect of these factors on the incidence
of cardiovascular diseases has dierent methodological and
conceptual limitations. Psychosocial factors specically in-
clude a low socioeconomic status, insucient social support,
work stress and family life, depression and anxiety, and hostil-
ity (Albus, 2010; de Mestral and Stringhini, 2017).
We focused on the issue of a patient’s socioeconomic situ-
ation and employment, as well as on questions about the im-
pact of the change in the patient’s lifestyle on their life and
who supports them in achieving the change.
e evidence on the inuence of workload on the incidence
of CVD is shown by Kivimäki and Kawachi (2015). ey bring
evidence from 600,000 men and women from 27 cohort stud-
ies that were carried out in Europe, the USA and Japan. ese
studies show that work stress, such as a high level of physical
labour and long working hours are related to a medium risk of
CVD and stroke. Small dierences were recorded in the com-
parison of men and women, elderly and younger people and
employees with a dierent SES. Only a few studies dealt with
practical intervention regarding work stress and its positive
eect. Despite this fact, governments started campaigns for
health support at workplaces with the focus on the restriction
of work stress. e support of the awareness of the relationship
between work stress and CVD is an important part of health
support. In our research, 67.5% of the respondents stated that
their doctor was interested in their job. In this question, it is
interesting that we recorded a relationship to gender. Women
responded positively more frequently than men (p < 0.01). It is
necessary to mention that work anamnesis should be an oblig-
atory part of a patient’s total anamnesis. Employment regard-
ing cardiovascular diseases is very important because work in
a stressful environment may cause or worsen the condition
of CVD. A much worse prognosis is proven in unemployed
patients (Töres et al., 2015). In our sample group, the ma-
jority of the respondents were employed and only 1.9% were
unemployed for more than 6 months. e question regarding
employment is related to the doctor’s interest in the patient’s
socioeconomic situation. According to the respondents, their
doctors show little interest in their socioeconomic situation
(20.6%). Here, we can see the relationship between a positive
response and employment (p < 0.001). e respondents who
are employed often responded negatively, which is in contrast
to the invalid pensioners or unemployed respondents. Here, it
is shown that doctors are interested in the way their patients
with low income manage their situation. is question is very
important because an employed patient can also have a low
income and thus be in a complicated situation which can cause
daily stress. Other questions concerned the doctors’ interest in
the respondents’ lifestyle and how CVD aected their life. In
both questions, more than 50% of the respondents respond-
ed positively (Chart 1). We identied a relationship between
the doctors’ interest in their patients’ lifestyle and gender (p <
0.05), age (p < 0.001) and job (p < 0.01). Men more frequently
responded positively, as well as the unemployed respondents,
pensioners and older respondents. If we are to provide pa-
tients with recommendations regarding changes in their life-
style, we should know their contemporary lifestyle. 58.7% of
the respondents responded positively to the question regard-
ing their doctor’s interest in their current lifestyle, which is
not a satisfying result, so we can say that doctors are inclined
toward unied recommendations. Another question is related
to the doctors’ interest in the way CVD aects a patient’s life.
58.8% of the respondents responded positively. Here, we can
also say that it is not a high number. Older respondents, un-
employed respondents, pensioners or those with a lower level
of education more frequently responded positively. We can say
that doctors’ questions about this issue are directed toward
the threatened groups of patients. e question about the in-
uence of CVD on life is related to social support. Social sup-
port is one of the most studied factors that moderate the in-
uence of negative life events. A number of studies show that
the combination of low social support and long-term stress is
a predictor of the incidence of a number of diseases (Compare
et al., 2013). In this study, we dealt with the question of who
is the largest support in the process of changing the lifestyle
of patients with CVD. e results are shown in Table 2. It is
clear that in our sample group the largest support is provided
by families, then doctors, friends, nurses and other patients.
e analysis of the second classication degree shows that the
choice of a doctor, nurse or friends as social support is related
to age, employment or marital status. It is clear that doctors,
nurses and friends are more frequently considered as support
in this issue by the respondents over 60 years and the respond-
ents living alone, those who were widowed and pensioners.
Limitations of the study
e conclusions can be limited by the random selection of the
sample group.
e conclusions provide evidence of the fact that doctors are
focused on gaining information about their patients’ employ-
ment, lifestyle and the inuence of CVD on their life. It is inter-
esting that fewer respondents are interested in the socioeco-
nomic situation, which is related to employment and the eect
on lifestyle. Most questions showed a signicant relationship
between age, employment and marital status. Respondents
over 60 years more frequently answered positively, as well as
Šedová et al. / KONTAKT
those who were widowed and pensioners. is fact can be re-
lated to the targeted intervention regarding these threatened
groups of patients. Most respondents consider family as sup-
port regarding the change in their lifestyle.
Conict of interests
e authors have no conict of interests to declare.
Supported by the program project of the Czech Ministry of
Health, reg. No. 15-31000A. All rights are reserved according
to regulations for protection of intellectual property.
Sociální opora v edukaci pacientů s kardiovaskulárními chorobami: situace v České republice
Výskyt kardiovaskulárních chorob je vázán na rizikové faktory životního stylu. Tradičními ovlivnitelnými faktory jsou kouření,
výživa, fyzická aktivita a psychosociální faktory. Mezi psychosociální faktory konkrétně patří nízké socioekonomické postavení,
nedostatek sociální opory, pracovní stres a stav nebo způsob rodinného života, deprese a úzkost, nepřátelství.
Cílem předložené studie bylo prokázat souvislost názorů na sledování vybraných psychosociálních faktorů kardiovaskulár-
ních chorob s vybranými sociodemograckými charakteristikami. K naplnění cílů byla využita kvantitativní metoda s využitím
řízených rozhovorů. Celkem bylo osloveno 1992 osob ve věku 40 let. Soubor byl reprezentativní věkem, pohlavím i bydlištěm.
Zjištěné informace byly podrobeny statistické analýze a míra závislosti byla hodnocena pomocí chí-2 testu, t-testu a testu analýzy.
Z výsledků je patrné, že se lékaři v rámci prevence ve své praxi orientují na získání informací o zaměstnání svých pacientů,
oživotním stylu pacienta i o tom, jak diagnostikované kardiovaskulární onemocnění ovlivňuje běžný život pacientů. Méně čas-
to dochází v praxi ke zjištění otázek k socioekonomickým faktorům. Ve většině otázek byla zachycena signikantní souvislost
svěkem, zaměstnáním a rodinným stavem. Kladně na otázky častěji odpovídali respondenti nad 60 let, respondenti ovdovělí
arespondenti v invalidním nebo starobním důchodu. Tento fakt může souviset s cílenou intervencí u těchto ohrožených skupin
pacientů. Pro většinu respondentů je rodina oporou v úpravě životosprávy.
Klíčová slova: kardiovaskulární; faktory; choroby; pacient; psychosociální; opora
1. Albus C (2010). Psychosocial and social factors in
coronary heart disease. Ann Med 42(7): 487–494.
2. Albus Ch, Hermann-Lingen Ch (2015). Behaviour and
motivation. In: Gielen S, De Backer G, Piepoli M, Wood D (Eds).
e ESC textbook of preventive cardiology. Oxford: Oxford
University Press, pp. 105–112.
3. Bruthans J, Mayer O Jr, De Bacquer D, De Smedt D, Reiner Z,
Kotseva K, et al. (2016). Educational level and risk prole and
risk control in patients with coronary heart disease. Eur J Prev
Cardiol 23(8): 881–890. DOI: 10.1177/2047487315601078.
4. Buford WT, Anton DS, Bavry AA, Carter CS, Daniels MJ,
PahorM (2015). Multi-modal intervention to reduce
cardiovascular risk among hypertensive older adults: Design of
a randomized clinical trial. Contemp Clin Trials 43: 237–242.
DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2015.06.019.
5. Callander EJ, McDermott R (2017). Measuring the eects of
CVD interventions and studies across socioeconomic groups:
A brief review. Int J Cardiol 227: 635–643. DOI: 10.1016/j.
6. Cífková R, Skodová Z, Bruthans J, Adámková J, JozífováM,
Galovcová M, et al. (2010). Longitudinal trends in major
cardiovascular risk factors in the Czech population between
1985 and 2007/8. Czech MONICA and Czech post-
MONICA. Atherosclerosis 211(2): 676–681. DOI: 10.1016/j.
7. Compare A, Zarbo C, Manzoni GM, Castelnuovo G, Baldassari E,
Bonardi A (2013). Social support, depression, and heart disease:
a ten year literature review. Front Psychol 4: 384. DOI: 10.3389/
8. de Mestral C, Stringhini S (2017). Socioeconomic status and
cardiovascular disease: an update. Curr Cardiol Rep 19: 115.
DOI: 10.1007/s11886-017-0917-z.
9. Doležel J, Jarošová D (2015). Analysis of clinical practice
guidelines for cardiovascular disease prevention. Kontakt 17(2):
96–102. DOI: 10.1016/j.kontakt.2015.05.001.
10. Gielen S, Backer De G; Piepoli FM, Wood D (2015). e ESC
Textbook of preventive cardiology. Oxford: Oxford University
11. Kabátová O, Uríčková A, Botíková A (2014). Factors aecting
the incidence of depression in the elderly. Cent Eur
J Nurs Midw 5(3): 105–111. DOI: 10.15452/
12. Kajanová A, Urban D, Hajduchová H (2016). Závěr, shrnutí,
doporučení, intervence. In: Kajanová A et al. (Eds). Sociální
determinanty zdraví u obyvatel sociálně vyloučených lokalit
žijících v Jihočeském kraji. Praha: NLN, pp. 85–88.
13. Kivimäki M, Kawachi I (2015). Work stress as a risk factor
for cardiovascular disease. Curr Cardiol Rep 17(9): 74.
14. Labarthe RD (2010). Epidemiology and prevention of
cardiovascular diseases. London: Janes and Barlett Publishers.
15. Piepoli MF, Hoes WH; Agewall S, Albus C, Brotons C,
CatapanoAL, et al. (2016). European Guidelines on
cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: e sixth
joint task force of the European society of cardiology and
other societies on cardiovascular disease Prevention in Clinical
Practice (constituted by representatives of 10 societies and by
invited experts). Eur Heart J 37(29): 2315–2381. DOI: 10.1093/
16. Puska P, Norrving Bo, World Health Organization (2011).
Global Atlas on cardiovascular disease prevention and control.
Geneva: WHO.
17. Schwarzer R (2008). Modeling health behavior change: how to
predict and modify the adoption and maintenance of health
behaviors. Appl Psychol 57(1): 1–29. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-
18. Slouka D et al. (2018a). Otorinolaryngologie. Praha: Galén.
19. Slouka D, Kučera R, Hošek P, Gál B, Trčka O, Kostlivý T, HavelD
(2018b). Key problems of the quality of life of patients after
Šedová et al. / KONTAKT
total laryngectomy. Kontakt 20(3): 249–255. DOI: 10.1016/j.
20. Solgajová A, Sollár T, Vörösová G (2015). Gender, age and
proactive coping as predictors of coping in patients with
limb amputation. Kontakt 17(1): e1–e7. DOI: 10.1016/j.
21. Töres T, Brisson Ch, Ouimet GM (2015). Psychosocial factors
I the prevention of cardiovascular disease. In: Gielen S, De
BackerG, Piepoli M, Wood D (Eds). e ESC textbook of
preventive cardiology. Oxford: Oxford University Press,
22. ÚZIS ČR (2016). Zdravotnická ročenka České republiky 2016.
Praha: ÚZIS ČR.
23. Wilkins E, Wilson L, Wickramasinghe K, Bhatnagar P, Leal J,
Luengo-Fernandez R, et al. (2017). European cardiovascular
disease statistics 2017. Brussels: European Heart Network.
Šedová et al. / KONTAKT
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Full-text available
Purpose of review: The aim of this paper is to summarize the recent and relevant evidence linking socioeconomic status (SES) to cardiovascular disease (CVD) and cardiovascular risk factors (CVRFs). Recent findings: In high-income countries (HICs), the evidence continues to expand, with meta-analyses of large longitudinal cohort studies consistently confirming the inverse association between SES and several CVD and CVRFs. The evidence remains limited in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs), where most of the evidence originates from cross-sectional studies of varying quality and external validity; the available evidence indicates that the association between SES and CVD and CVRFs depends on the socioeconomic development context and the stage in the demographic, epidemiological, and nutrition transition of the population. The recent evidence confirms that SES is strongly inversely associated with CVD and CVRFs in HICs. However, there remains a need for more research to better understand the way socioeconomic circumstances become embodied in early life and throughout the life course to affect cardiovascular risk in adult and later life. In LMICs, the evidence remains scarce; thus, there is an urgent need for large longitudinal studies to disaggregate CVD and CVRFs by socioeconomic indicators, particularly as these countries already suffer the greatest burden of CVD.
Full-text available
ABI : ankle–brachial (blood pressure) index ABPM : ambulatory blood pressure monitoring ACCORD : Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes ACE-I : angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor ACS : acute coronary syndromes ADVANCE : Action in Diabetes and Vascular disease: PreterAx
Full-text available
The role of psychosocial work stress as a risk factor for chronic disease has been the subject of considerable debate. Many researchers argue in support of a causal connection while others remain skeptical and have argued that the effect on specific health conditions is either negligible or confounded. This review of evidence from over 600,000 men and women from 27 cohort studies in Europe, the USA and Japan suggests that work stressors, such as job strain and long working hours, are associated with a moderately elevated risk of incident coronary heart disease and stroke. The excess risk for exposed individuals is 10-40 % compared with those free of such stressors. Differences between men and women, younger versus older employees and workers from different socioeconomic backgrounds appear to be small, indicating that the association is robust. Meta-analyses of a wider range of health outcomes show additionally an association between work stress and type 2 diabetes, though not with common cancers or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, suggesting outcome specificity. Few studies have addressed whether mitigation of work stressors would reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease. In view of the limited interventional evidence on benefits, harms and cost-effectiveness, definitive recommendations have not been made (e.g. by the US Preventive Services Taskforce) for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease via workplace stress reduction. Nevertheless, governments are already launching healthy workplace campaigns, and preventing excessive work stress is a legal obligation in several countries. Promoting awareness of the link between stress and health among both employers and workers is an important component of workplace health promotion.
Introduction: Laryngeal cancer is the most frequent cancer in the head and neck area. Approximately one third of patients are treated by total laryngectomy (TL). The rate of the patient's adaptation to new conditions is crucial to the quality of his or her future life. Some patients survive tens of years after this operation. The preparation for TL is a complicated process that affects a patientʼs cooperation in postsurgical time. The patient is informed of the essence of the disease, treatment possibilities, the process of preoperative preparation, as well as the operation itself. Great emphasis is put on awareness of the postoperative development, the patient's good cooperation, as well as good prognosis of the disease. Losing one's voice and the cosmetic defects caused by the tracheostoma are a great problem for the patient. The aim of this study was to show the main problems that patients after total laryngectomy deal with in common life. Material: In the group, there were 102 patients who had been operated on between 2003 and 2013, 62 of which met the classification criteria. Methods: This prospective study was statistically evaluated. The frequencies of responses were processed in tables. Results: During the early postoperative period, the greatest problem of patients after total laryngectomy is their adaptation to new principles of breathing, which is subsequently followed by the adaptation to a new and different way of communication. The best option for the patient is to communicate using esophageal voice. Only 55% of operated patients use one of the verbal forms of alternative voice communication in their future lives. © 2018 Faculty of Health and Social Sciences of University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice
There is a known socioeconomic skew in prevalence and outcomes of cardiovascular disease (CVD). To document the proportion of clinical trials and observational studies related to CVD recently published in peer-reviewed journals that report the socio-economic distributional differences in their outcomes. We undertook a review of peer-reviewed clinical trials and observational studies relating to CVD published between 01/06/2015 – 31/12/2015 in PubMed; and identified the proportion that included measures of socioeconomic status and the proportion that stratified results by, or controlled for, socioeconomic status when reporting outcomes. 414 peer reviewed publications reporting the outcomes of clinical trials or observational studies that related to CVD were identified. 32 of these reported on the socioeconomic status of participants. Of these, 20 stratified the results by socioeconomic status or adjusted the results for socioeconomic status. 18 studies measured education attainment, 5 measured income, 1 measured rurality and 1 measured occupation. Of the 414 articles reporting the outcomes of clinical trials or observational studies related to cardiovascular disease in 2015, the effectiveness of the intervention, or the differences in outcomes, between socioeconomic groups was assessed in 5% of studies. This lack of consideration of the effectiveness of trial outcomes or the differences in outcomes across socioeconomic groups impairs the ability of readers, healthcare professionals and policy makers to assess the impact of new treatments or interventions in closing the inequality gap associated with CVD.
The purpose of this study was to ascertain way in which conventional risk factors, readiness to modify behaviour and to comply with recommended medication, and the effect of this medication were associated with education in patients with established coronary heart disease (CHD). The EUROASPIRE IV (EUROpean Action on Secondary Prevention by Intervention to Reduce Events) study was a cross-sectional survey undertaken in 24 European countries to ascertain how recommendations on secondary CHD prevention are being followed in clinical practice. Consecutive patients, men and women ≤80 years of age who had been hospitalized for an acute coronary syndrome or revascularization procedure, were identified retrospectively. Data were collected through an interview with examinations at least six months and no later than three years after hospitalization. A total of 7937 patients (1934 (24.37%) women) were evaluated. Patients with primary education were older, with a larger proportion of women. Control of risk factors, as defined by Joint European Societies 4 and 5 guidelines, was significantly better with higher education for current smoking (p = 0.001), overweight and obesity (p = 0.047 and p = 0.029, respectively), low physical activity (p < 0.001) and low high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol (p = 0.011) in men, and for obesity (p = 0.005), high blood pressure (p < 0.005 and p < 0.001), low physical activity (p = 0.001), diabetes (p < 0.001) and low HDL-cholesterol (p = 0.023) in women. Patients with primary and secondary education were more often treated with diuretics and antidiabetic drugs. Better control of hypertension was achieved in patients with higher education. Particular risk communication and control are needed in secondary CHD prevention for patients with lower educational status. © The European Society of Cardiology 2015.
Persons aged over 65years account for over 75% of healthcare expenditures and deaths attributable to cardiovascular disease (CVD). Accordingly, reducing CVD risk among older adults is an important public health priority. Functional status, determined by measures of physical performance, is an important predictor of cardiovascular outcomes in older adults and declines more rapidly in seniors with hypertension. To date, physical exercise is the primary strategy for attenuating declines in functional status. Yet despite the general benefits of training, exercise alone appears to be insufficient for preventing this decline. Thus, alternative or adjuvant strategies are needed to preserve functional status among seniors with hypertension. Prior data suggest that angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) may be efficacious in enhancing exercise-derived improvements in functional status yet this hypothesis has not been tested in a randomized controlled trial. The objective of this randomized, double-masked pilot trial is to gather preliminary efficacy and safety data necessary for conducting a full-scale trial to test this hypothesis. Sedentary men and women≥65years of age with functional limitations and hypertension are being recruited into this 24week intervention study. Participants are randomly assigned to one of three conditions: (1) ACEi plus exercise training, (2) thiazide diuretic plus exercise training, or (3) AT1 receptor antagonist plus exercise training. The primary outcome is change in walking speed and secondary outcomes consist of other indices of CV risk including exercise capacity, body composition, as well as circulating indices of metabolism, inflammation and oxidative stress. Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Inc.