ArticlePDF Available

New-onset insomnia among cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy: prevalence, risk factors, and its correlation with other symptoms

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Study objectives Although insomnia is common among cancer patients, its prevalence remains variable, and its risk factors and correlation with other cancer-related symptoms are not fully explored in the literature. This study aims to determine the prevalence and severity of insomnia as well as risk factors and sleep-related symptom clusters in a sample of cancer patients. Methods A cross-sectional survey was conducted collecting data from 213 cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy (age = 53.1 ± 11.3 years, 60% female). Insomnia was measured using the Insomnia Severity Index, a sleep log, and Actigraph, while symptoms were assessed using the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Quality of life was measured with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy—General. Results Of the participants, 42.8% reported insomnia, with 31.9% of those with insomnia reporting severe insomnia. Insomnia occurrence and severity were not correlated with the participants’ characteristics, cancer-related or treatment-related factors, only with the participants’ anxiety/depression scores. Principal component analysis showed that insomnia, depression, and anxiety formed a symptom cluster (p < 0.001). There was no difference between sleep parameters measured by Actigraphy in insomnia and non-insomnia participants. Conclusion This study demonstrated that the prevalence of insomnia was high and indicated a symptom cluster of insomnia, depression, and anxiety. Therefore, interventions to reduce this symptom cluster may benefit cancer patients who are trying to manage these symptoms.
Content may be subject to copyright.
SLEEP BREATHING PHYSIOLOGY AND DISORDERS ORIGINAL ARTICLE
New-onset insomnia among cancer patients undergoing
chemotherapy: prevalence, risk factors, and its correlation
with other symptoms
Huong Thi Xuan Hoang
1,2
&Alex Molassiotis
1
&Choi Wan Chan
1
&Thi Huong Nguyen
3
&Van Liep Nguyen
2
Received: 14 December 2018 /Revised: 26 March 2019 /Accepted: 30 March 2019
#Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019
Abstract
Study objectives Although insomnia is common among cancer patients, its prevalence remains variable, and its risk factors and
correlation with other cancer-related symptoms are not fully explored in the literature. This study aims to determine the preva-
lence and severity of insomnia as well as risk factors and sleep-related symptom clusters in a sample of cancer patients.
Methods A cross-sectional survey was conducted collecting data from 213 cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy (age =
53.1 ± 11.3 years, 60% female). Insomnia was measured using the Insomnia Severity Index, a sleep log, and Actigraph, while
symptoms were assessed using the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale.
Quality of life was measured with the Functional Assessment of Cancer TherapyGeneral.
Results Of the participants, 42.8% reported insomnia, with 31.9% of those with insomnia reporting severe insomnia. Insomnia
occurrence and severity were not correlated with the participantscharacteristics, cancer-related or treatment-related factors, only
with the participantsanxiety/depression scores. Principal component analysis showed that insomnia, depression, and anxiety
formed a symptom cluster (p< 0.001). There was no difference between sleep parameters measured by Actigraphy in insomnia
and non-insomnia participants.
Conclusion This study demonstrated that the prevalence of insomnia was high and indicated a symptom cluster of insomnia,
depression, and anxiety. Therefore, interventions to reduce this symptom cluster may benefit cancer patients who are trying to
manage these symptoms.
Keywords Insomnia .Depression .Anxiety .Symptom cluster .Cancer .Chemotherapy .Quality of life .Actigraph
Introduction
Insomnia is common among patients undergoing chemother-
apy treatment [1,2]. Previous studies have revealed a wide
range of insomnia prevalence in cancer patients from 8.95 to
93.3% [36]. Insomnia can be categorized as either a symp-
tom or a disease [7]. When being categorized as a symptom,
insomnia can be detected by using questionnaires such as the
Insomnia Severity Index and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index.
In this study, insomnia is categorized as a symptom based on
an Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) score of 15 or above.
Insomnia generates adverse health problems. Short-term
consequences include somatic problems and psychological
and social issues, while the long-term consequences are more
severe and include cardiovascular disease, obesity, and cancer
[8]. Studies indicated that people with insomnia have a high
risk of developing a wide range of cancers [811]. Results of a
recent study stated that insomnia could damage DNA and
lower the bodys ability to repair this, possibly increasing the
risk of developing cancer [12]. Insomnia is a major problem
and significantly associated with poorer quality of life among
cancer patients [1315]. Furthermore, short sleep duration is
The institutions where work was performed:
1. Vietnam National Cancer Hospital, 43 Quan Su St., Hoan Kiem
district, Hanoi, Vietnam
2. Bach Mai Hospital, 78 Giai Phong St., Dong Da district, Hanoi,
Vietnam
3. Hanoi Oncology Hospital, 42A Thanh Nhan, Hanoi, Vietnam
*Alex Molassiotis
alex.molasiotis@polyu.edu.hk
1
School of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, 11 Yuk
Choi Rd, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR
2
Faculty of Nursing, Phenikaa University, Hanoi, Vietnam
3
Hanoi Medical College, Hanoi, Vietnam
Sleep and Breathing
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11325-019-01839-x
associated with mortality in cancer patients [16]. However,
this condition often goes unrecognized because patients do
not report their sleep difficulties [17]. Also, this condition
has received little attention by clinicians and researchers [13,
1821].
The lack of using standardized questionnaires has resulted in
a wide range of insomnia prevalence in the literature. In addi-
tion, most studies are conducted on small sample sizes with
diverse participant characteristics, which can lead to the inabil-
ity to conduct subgroup analysis and identify potential risk
factors of insomnia [17]. Moreover, few studies have included
an objective measurement to explore specific impaired sleep
patterns or quantify insomnia among participants [13,17].
Although a variety of factors are associated with the develop-
ment of insomnia in cancer patients (e.g., gender, age, cancer
treatments, unpleasant symptoms), mixed results were shown
across studies regarding risk factors and only a limited number
of studies have been conducted to determine if insomnia affects
individuals undergoing chemotherapy [22]. Therefore, more
studies are needed to clarify these gaps in the literature.
Recent studies indicated that insomnia correlates with other
symptoms to form a Bsymptom cluster^(SC). A symptom clus-
ter has been defined as at least two symptoms co-occurring,
being clinically meaningful together, and relating to each other
[23,24]. Different sleep-related symptom clusters (SCs) in can-
cer patients have been reported in the literature, including fa-
tigue, depression, and insomnia [4,13,25]; pain, fatigue, and
insomnia [2628]; pain, depression, and insomnia in prostate
cancer patients [29]; and depression, anxiety, pain, and insom-
nia in breast cancer patients receiving aromatase inhibitors [30].
However, the correlation between insomnia and other symp-
toms is not fully investigated due to limitations of previous
studies, including not using validated questionnaires to measure
insomnia [4,13,25,26,28,31] and measuring a limited num-
berofsymptoms[4,13,25,26,28,31]. Moreover, the use of
small sample sizes [25,26,28,31] and investigating insomnia
on specific cancer diagnoses limits our ability to generalize
sleep-related SCs in cancer patients [26,2831].
The objective of this study was to provide evidence of the
prevalence of insomnia with its severity in cancer patients
undergoing chemotherapy, objectively quantify insomnia
among participants, clarify possible risk factors for insomnia,
determine how insomnia impacts the participants' quality of
life, and identify sleep-related symptom clusters.
Methods
Participants
This cross-sectional survey included cancer patients from three
large cancer hospitals in Hanoi, Vietnam, including Vietnam
National Cancer Institution, Bachmai Hospital, and Hanoi
Oncology Hospital. Patients with any cancer diagnosis were
invited if they were undergoing chemotherapy in the participat-
ing hospitals between May and July 2017 using convenience
sampling method. The inclusion criteria were age 2084 years
old and having a Karnofsky Performance Index 80. Patients
were excluded if they had cognitive impairments or psychiatric
disorder (based on clinical records or clinician opinion) as these
conditions would prohibit completion of the questionnaires or
adhere with Actigraph use requirements, history of insomnia
before the diagnosis of cancer (based on clinical records or as
reported by patient) as the study aimed to capture new-onset
insomnia related to cancer and its treatment time, and presence
of a sleep disorder other than insomnia and receiving insomnia
treatment for at least 1 month prior to the study.
Procedures
Data were collected by the principal researcher and two re-
search assistants. Potential participants were approached and
invited to the study on the first day they were admitted to the
hospital. The purpose of the study was explained to them.
Participants who agreed to participate were informed of the
procedures in detail and were provided with the study informa-
tion sheet. Each participant signed the consent form.
Afterwards, they were given the questionnaires to complete.
Before they were discharged from the hospital, the principal
researcher gave them the actigraphy and explained how to use
it. The study obtained ethical approval from the Human Subject
Ethics Board, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University (Hong
Kong SAR), and Hanoi School of Public Health (Vietnam).
Measurements
Insomnia
The Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), a sleep log, and Actigraph
were used to assess insomnia. The ISI is a self-reported question-
naire consisting of seven items. A score of 15 and above indicat-
ed the patient had insomnia; the insomnia severity is interpreted
as follows: moderate insomnia (ISI score of 15 to 21) and severe
insomnia (ISI score of 22 to 28) [32]. This instrument has been
validated and translated into Vietnamese [33]. In this study, the
ISI had high reliability, with Cronbachsα= 0.92.
Actigraph The wGT3X-BT was used to collect the following
data:
&Total sleep time (TST): the period measured from sleep
onset during nighttime to the final awakening.
&True sleep time (TuST): the period that patient actually
sleeps.
&Wake after sleep onset (WASO): a period of time spent
awake after the sleep onset, calculated by TST minus TuST.
Sleep Breath
&Mid-sleep awakening: the number of awakenings during a
sleep period.
&Sleep efficiency: calculated by dividing TuST (at night) by
TST (at night) multiplied by 100%.
The data were collected in 1-min epochs and scored with
the ActiLife6 version 6.13.3 software using the Cole-Kripker
algorithm, and the sampling rate was 30 Hz. Patients were
asked to wear the Actigraph for three consecutive nights
[34]. This device has been validated in measuring sleep pa-
rameters with Actiwatch 2 (a device that has been validated
previously) among 49 adults in Hong Kong; results from the
study indicated that Actigraph wGT3X-BT could measure
sleep parameters similarly to Actiwatch 2 (Spearman correla-
tions ranging from 0.74 to 0.90) [35].
A sleep log was used to calculate sleep onset and sleep
efficiency in the study participants. The components of the
sleep logs were:
&The time that individuals went to bed
&The time that individuals got out of bed
&Time the Actigraph was removed from the participants
wrist
&Number of night awakenings
The sleep log helped in identifying misclassified sleep or
wake during the recordings (e.g., motionless activities such as
watching a movie, sitting in a car, which are scored as sleep).
Therefore, participants were asked to complete a 3-day sleep
log during the time they wore the Actigraph.
Other symptom assessments
The validated Vietnamese version of The Memorial Symptom
Assessment Scale (MSAS) (α= 0.79) was used to measure 32
symptoms (Long NH, 2010, Factors related to postoperative
symptoms among patients undergoing abdominal surgery.
Burapha University, unpublished MSc thesis). In this study,
the internal consistency was reported to be high, with the
overall scale having α= 0.92, the psychological subscale
α= 0.80, and the physical subscale α=0.83.
The Vietnamese version of the Hospital Anxiety and
Depression Scale (HADS) was used to measure depression
and anxiety (Long NH, 2010, unpublished MSc thesis). This
scale has seven items measuring anxiety and seven items mea-
suring depression over the past week. In the current study, the
Cronbachs alpha for the scale was 0.87, for the anxiety sub-
scale was 0.86, and for the depression subscale was 0.76.
Quality of life
The Vietnamese version of Functional Assessment of
Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) was used in this
study to assess the quality of life in participants [36].
The questionnaire consists of 27 items and has four sub-
scales: The physical well-being (PWB), the social/family
well-being (SWB), the emotional well-being (EWB), and
the functional well-being (FWB). In this study, the
Cronbachs alpha for the scale was 0.89 and for the
EBW subscales was 0.78, for the FWB was 0.82, for
the PWB was 0.81, and for the SWB was 0.82.
Data analysis
Data were analyzed using SPSS 20.0. Between-group com-
parisons were performed using Ttests and one-way
ANOVA for continuous variables and χ
2
test for categori-
cal variables. Spearmanscorrelationswereusedtoassess
the association between insomnia and other variables.
Symptom clusters were identified by using principal com-
ponent analysis (PCA). The statistical significance level
was set at p<0.05.
Results
There were 224 patients included in the study; 11 patients
withdrew from the study during the time they wore the
Actigraph, leaving a final sample of 213 participants.
Figure 1depicts the flow of the studys participant recruit-
ment. The mean age of patients was 53.1 ± 11.3 (min 21,
max 80), with 60% being female. Nearly one-third of the
participants were diagnosed with breast cancer. The vast
majority of the sample was in cancer stage 2 (n= 66,
31%) and stage 3 (n= 62, 29.1%). More details are shown
in Table 1.
Prevalence and severity of insomnia
There were 42.8% of participants (n= 91) reporting insomnia.
Among the participants reporting insomnia, 68.1% reported
moderate insomnia and 31.9% reported severe insomnia.
Risk factors for insomnia
There was no difference between the average ISI score and
insomnia occurrence regarding different gender, age groups,
cancer diagnoses, cancer stages, and chemotherapy regimens
(all p> 0.05). Patients with depression had a significantly
higher ISI score and greater insomnia prevalence than patients
with no depression (mean score = 15.4 vs. 11.36; 60.4% vs.
39.6%, respectively, both p< 0.01), and patients with anxiety
had a higher ISI score and greater insomnia prevalence than
those with no anxiety (mean score = 15.24 vs. 11.61; 63.7%
vs. 36.3%, respectively, both p<0.001) (Table 2). Insomnia
Sleep Breath
occurrence was correlated with anxiety (r= 0.30; p< 0.01)
and depression (r=0.27; p<0.01).
Symptom clusters analysis
Before performing PCA, we excluded the MSAS item of
BDifficulty sleeping^and included the scores for ISI, anxiety,
and depression. PCA was thus conducted on 34 items with
varimax rotation. We determined SCs based on four dimen-
sions: symptom frequency, symptom severity, symptom dis-
tress, and total symptom score. The results showed that across
the insomnia symptom dimensions, anxiety, depression, and
depressive symptoms (worrying, feeling sad) formed a clear
SC (Table 3).
Among participants with insomnia, there were 44 partici-
pants (48.4%) reporting the sleep-related SC and 47 partici-
pants (51.6%) reporting insomnia only. Among participants
reporting the sleep-related symptom cluster, 21 patients
(47.7%) reported three symptoms (insomnia, depression, and
anxiety) and 23 patients (52.7%) reported two symptoms (in-
somnia and depression/anxiety).
The impact of insomnia and sleep-related symptom
cluster on participants' quality of life
Participants experiencing the sleep-related SC had significant-
ly lower QOL scores in comparison with non-insomnia pa-
tients and participants reporting insomnia only (all p<0.001).
They also had worse scores than those without insomnia or
those reporting insomnia only regarding emotional, function-
al, and physical well-being. Participants reporting insomnia
only had significantly poorer scores in comparison with non-
insomnia participants regarding functional well-being
(p< 0.05) (Tables 4and 5).
Sleep parameters measured by Actigraph and sleep
log
According to the results from Actigraphy, insomnia patients
slept 363.75 min (6 h) per night on average, and their sleep
efficiency was 89%. Furthermore, their average WASO was
44.2 min with 1.4 times on average being awakened. In com-
parison, the results measured by the participantssleep log
Fig. 1 Flowchart of study
recruitment
Sleep Breath
reported that these same participants slept 354.82 min (6h)
and woke up 1.8 times on average per night.
The results also indicated that there was no significant dif-
ference in sleep parameters measured by Actigraph or sleep
log in terms of TST, TuST, SE, and the number of night awak-
enings and WASO between insomnia and non-insomnia par-
ticipants (Table 6).
Discussion
In the general population, insomnia is one of the most common
sleep disorders with a prevalence that is approximately 10 to
20% [37,38]. The findings of this study showed a high preva-
lence of new-onset complaints of insomnia among cancer pa-
tients undergoing chemotherapy which is double that of the
general population. This prevalence in our study is higher than
previous studies which also used ISI to measure insomnia in
cancer patients [5,29,39]. The difference can be explained by
the characteristics of the samples used. More specifically, Morris
et al. [39] recruited participants who contacted a cancer care
helpline and this could create a selection bias [3]. Davis et al.
[5] recruited advanced cancer patients who participated in a
palliative medicine program and did not report the type of cancer
treatment the participants received [8]. However, two studies
conducted in breast cancer patients and prostate cancer patients
indicated that the chemotherapy period was associated with
more insomnia severity than other times, which is in line with
our findings [3,40]. Furthermore, our sample was drawn from
Vietnamese hospitals, where patients are often treated in over-
crowded clinics, and patients often have to travel long distances
from other regions to attend for treatment in Hanoi. Hence, we
can conclude that the peri-chemotherapy time is a stressful time
that is strongly linked with the development of insomnia com-
plaints in cancer patients as a relatively high percentage of che-
motherapy patients have moderate to severe insomnia complaints.
We did not find a significant difference in insomnia frequen-
cy and severity rates between male and female participants,
participants in different age groups and different cancer diag-
noses or cancer stages (although breast cancer patients and
those receiving taxanes had numerically higher percentage of
insomnia complaints in our sample). These findings are differ-
ent from some of the existing literature. Gender and age were
identified as predisposing factors for insomnia in cancer pa-
tients as well as in the general population [21,41].
Nevertheless, these findings are in line with some recent studies
in cancer patients, whereby there was no significant difference
in insomnia rates between males and females and participants in
different age groups [1,15,39,42,43]. Several large-scale
studies, however, found significant differences in insomnia
prevalence between lung/breast cancer patients compared to
other cancer diagnoses [4,44]. Some potential reasons for the
differences may include the antiemetic drugs used (i.e., dexa-
methasone), tumor biology, and side effects from chemotherapy
(i.e., menopause) [4,44]. In addition, we found participants
reporting depression and/or anxiety had significantly higher
insomnia rates than those with no depression and anxiety.
Table 1 Demographic and clinical characteristics of the participants
(N=213)
Number Percent
Age group
45 54 25.4
4660 104 48.8
>60 55 25.8
Marital status
Single 13 6.1
Married 189 88.7
Divorced/widowed 11 5.1
Hospital
Hospital A 74 34.7
Hospital B 45 21.1
Hospital C 94 44.1
Occupation
Unemployed 30 14.1
Retired 51 23.9
Laborer 80 37.6
Officer 12 5.6
Teacher 11 5.2
Others (medical staff, engineer, freelancer) 29 13.6
Education
Primary school 18 8.5
High school or part of 145 68.1
College or part of 28 13.1
University or higher 22 10.3
Comorbidity
None 177 83.1
Diabetes 7 3.3
Hypertension 13 6.1
Hypertension and diabetes 3 1.4
Degenerative spine 5 2.3
Others (adiposis hepatica, gout, dyslipidemia) 8 3.8
Cancer diagnosis
Breast cancer 59 27.7
Gynecologic cancer 24 11.3
Lung/bronchial cancer 41 19.2
Gastrointestinal cancer 38 17.8
Non-Hodgkins lymphoma 30 14.1
Laryngeal cancer 3 1.4
Nasopharyngeal cancer 12 5.6
Brain cancer 2 0.9
Urinary system cancer 4 1.9
Cancer stage
12813.1
26631.0
36229.1
45726.8
Surgical debulking
Optimal 121 56.8
Suboptimal 20 9.4
No information/no surgery 72 33.8
Chemotherapy Regimen
Taxanes 10 2 47.9
Cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin 50 23.5
Oxaliplatin 23 10.8
Gemcitabine 18 8.5
Others (vinorelbine, rituximab, trastuzumab) 20 9.4
Sleep Breath
Studies in the literature also showed consistently that patients
with depression experience insomnia, and insomnia is also a
risk factor for developing depression and anxiety [45]. Anxiety
brings more difficulty in falling asleep resulting in less restor-
ative sleep and nightmares, while depression has been linked to
difficulties maintaining sleep and unwanted early waking up in
the morning as well as nightmares [46,47]. Therefore, the rate
and severity of insomnia may be related to the participants
distressing symptoms and not only to the participantscharac-
teristics and cancer diagnosis or treatment variables.
In our study, participants with the sleep-related SC had a
significantly worse global QOL score as well as other subscale
scores (except for the SWB) than those without insomnia, or
those reporting insomnia only. The sleep-related SC seemed to
contribute to lower physical and FWB and poorer EWB of the
patients. The consistent results from previous studies also support
our findings of how insomnia impacts on patientsquality of life
[1315,19,48,49]. Insomnia caused cancer patients to be less
able to cope with stress and carry on with their daily activities and
had greater difficulty dealing with emotional problems [14,15],
which impaired them physically and emotionally [48,49].
This survey identified insomnia, anxiety, depression, and
depressive symptoms (worrying and feeling sad) all forming a
SC. Since worrying and feeling sad are symptoms of
Table 2 Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) score classification by the demographic and clinical characteristics of the sample
Number ISI score (mean) SD p(for mean score) Insomnia
participant, n=91(%)
p(for insomnia
occurrence)
Gender 0.98 0.54
Male 84 13.3 7.4 36 (39.6%)
Female 129 13.3 6.6 55 (60.4%)
Age groups 0.34 0.058
45 55 12.8 6.2 17 (18.7%)
4660 104 13.0 7.2 45 (49.5%)
> 60 54 14.5 7.3 29 (31.9%)
Cancer diagnosis 0.54 0.26
Breast cancer 59 13.14 6.7 24 (26.4%)
Gynecologic cancer 24 13.92 6.14 11 (12.1%)
Lung/bronchial cancer 41 13.54 7.4 18 (19.8%)
Gastrointestinal cancer 38 11.5 6.47 11 (12.1%)
Non-Hodgkins lymphoma 30 14.27 7.82 14 (15.4%)
Laryngeal cancer 3 13.2 6.5 0 (0%)
Nasopharyngeal cancer 12 14.32 7.2 10 (10.9)
Brain cancer 2 12.5 6.7 0 (0%)
Urinary system cancer 4 14.12 7.1 3 (3.3%)
Chemotherapy regiment 0.81 0.87
Taxanes 102 12.85 7.08 43 (47.3%)
Cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin 50 13.62 0.07 20 (22%)
Oxaliplatin 23 13.96 6.49 10 (11%)
Gemcitabine 18 12.83 7.39 8 (8.8%)
Others 20 14.6 7.3 10 (11%)
Cancer stage 0.65 0.81
1 28 12.9 6.2 12 (13.2%)
2 66 13.0 7.2 28 (30.8%)
3 62 14.5 7.3 29 (31.9%)
4 57 13.3 7.0 22 (24.2%)
Depression p< 0.0001 p< 0.0001
No depression 110 11.36 6.3 36 (39.6%)
Depression 103 15.4 7.1 55 (60.4%)
Anxiety p< 0.0001 0.001
No anxiety 113 11.61 7.07 33 (36.3%)
Anxiety 103 15.24 6.50 58 (63.7%)
Sleep Breath
depression [50], we conclude that insomnia, anxiety, and de-
pression form a clear and concrete SC. Previous studies in
different cancer populations also reported similar findings
[51,52]. Results from a systematic review further suggested
a bidirectional relationship between insomnia, depression, and
anxiety [53]. However, previous studies used non-specific
scales to measure symptoms [52] or identified symptom clus-
ters on one dimension of the symptom experience (severity)
[51,53]. It is interesting to see that the correlations between
the three symptoms were low in the correlational analysis,
suggesting that other factors, not examined in this study,
may be part of this relation. However, the strength of this
relationship became moderate-to-strong in the SC analysis.
Hence, anxiety and depression are clearly part of insomnia,
but perhaps not the only parts. This supports the use of selec-
tive serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) as an option to im-
prove sleep in this population when anxiety and/or depression
are present, balancing well the possible beneficial effect over
side effects and polypharmacy. However, as SSRIs have mul-
tiple side effects, can be addictive, and there are other factors
contributing to insomnia in cancer patients who often experi-
ence a high symptom burden, they have a place in the man-
agement of insomnia in select patients but should not be con-
sidered as the drug of choice in this population. To our knowl-
edge, our study is the first study to date using standardized
measurements to assess insomnia, depression, and anxiety and
identify SCs based on different dimensions of the symptom
experience that give more concrete evidence that insomnia,
anxiety, and depression form a SC.
The results also demonstrated there was no difference be-
tween sleep parameters measured by Actigraph between in-
somnia and non-insomnia participants. The average true sleep
time for both insomnia and non-insomnia participants was
greater than 6 h per night, and the sleep efficiently was nearly
90%. Interestingly, we found that insomnia participants slept
more than non-insomnia participants (although the difference
was not significant) but they seemed to have lower sleep effi-
ciency and tended to wake up more often. Using both objec-
tive and subjective measurements are being recommended to
evaluate multiple sleep parameters of insomnia [34,54].
However, our study indicates the sleep parameters between
insomnia and non-insomnia participants are related to pa-
tientsexperience of insomnia, and how their perceived sleep
quality impacts on their lives rather thanobjective quantifiable
sleep parameters, which cannot incorporate patient percep-
tions. A study also found insomnia frequency is related to
patientsperception about sleep, but not the result from objec-
tive measurements [55].
Recent studies further reported a difference between the
participants perceptionof sleep quality and objective measure-
ments [56,57]. A study by Siberfarb et al. indicated that per-
ceptions of Bpoor^or Bgood^sleep were associated with the
Table 3 Identifying symptom clusters by MSAS, ISI, anxiety, and depression score
Symptom occurrence Symptom severity Symptom distress Total symptom score
SC components rSC components rSC components rSC components r
Anxiety
Depression
Insomnia
Worrying
Feeling sad
0.72
0.77
0.63
0.45
0.4
Anxiety
Depression
Insomnia
Worrying
Feeling sad
0.7
0.78
0.62
0.5
0.44
Anxiety
Depression
Insomnia
0.79
0.61
0.61
Anxiety
Depression
Insomnia
Worrying
0.64
0.73
0.62
0.44
KMO 0.86 0.86 0.87 0.84
χ
2
2339.44 2413.48 2506.89 3358.06
p<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Table 4 Participantsquality of life (QOL) and subscales score. The higher score indicates worse emotional well-being while higher score indicates
better functional/ physical/social well-being and overall QOL
Participants reporting
insomnia only (n=44)
(mean, SD)
Participants reporting the
sleep-related symptom
cluster (n= 47) (mean, SD)
Non-insomnia participants
(n= 122) (mean, SD)
Emotional well-being (EWB) score 9.48 ± 6.12 14.04 ± 5.07 9.1 ± 5.68
Functional well-being (FWB) score 15.52 ± 5.56 11.55 ± 4.32 17.94 ± 6.06
Physical well-being (PWB) score 17.88 ± 5 .76 12.81 ± 4.59 19.73 ± 5.68
Social/family well-being (SWB) score 20.99 ± 6.83 19.35 ± 4.25 21.28 ± 5.87
QOL score 70.06 ± 15.6 53.2 ± 10.37 75.15 ± 16.86
Sleep Breath
amount of delta sleep (the deepest form of sleep) but not with
other objective sleep parameters in cancer patients [58]. This
condition may also be explained by Bthe sleep discrepancy^
referring to underestimation of the total sleep time and over-
estimation of the sleep latency, and wakening after sleep onset
in insomnia patients [59]. Sleep experts define this sleep dis-
crepancy as Bparadoxical insomnia,^experienced by up to
50% of insomnia patients [60]. Considering the above evi-
dence, Actigraphy can measure sleep parameters but it does
not measure the sleep quality as perceived by the patients, and
the latter informs the patientssatisfactionwithsleep,aspart
of the experience of insomnia. Furthermore, patientssatisfac-
tion with sleep may impact on their psychological states (anx-
iety/depression) and their quality of life, relating to the co-
occurrence of sleep-related symptoms.
The use of a large sample size, multi-site data collection,
sample diagnostic heterogeneity, and measuring insomnia
both subjectively and objectively are strengths of this study.
However, due to limitations inherent in cross-sectional sur-
veys, the study cannot point out which symptom (anxiety,
depression, and insomnia) occurred first nor how they influ-
ence each other or how these symptoms change over the tra-
jectory of the illness. Our suggestion regarding the lack of
difference between sleep parameters measured objectively be-
tween insomnia and non-insomnia participants should be
interpreted with caution, as participants were required to wear
Actigraph for three nights only, which is relatively short time
and may easily be affected by intra-night variability among
patients. A longer Actigraph measurement may potentially
correlate better with subjective measurements.
In addition, not measuring day time napping is also a lim-
itation of this study. Changes in sleep architecture and mal-
adaptive sleep behavior include prolonged bedtime and day-
time napping that are considered as perpetuating factors con-
tributing to the maintenance of insomnia. Cancer patients, in
Table 5 The impact of insomnia to participantsquality of life (QOL)
(1) (2) Mean difference (1)(2) Std. error p
Emotional well-being score Non-insomnia participants Participants reporting insomnia only 0.38 0.99 0.70
Participants reporting sleep-related SC 4.94 0.99 < 0.001
Participants reporting insomnia only Participants reporting sleep-related SC 4.56 1.18 < 0.001
Functional well-being score Non-insomnia participants Participants reporting insomnia only 2.4 0.98 < 0.05
Participants reporting sleep-related SC 6.3 0.96 < 0.001
Participants reporting insomnia only Participants reporting sleep-related SC 3.96 1.17 < 0.001
Physical well-being score Non-insomnia participants Participants reporting insomnia only 1.84 0.96 0.057
Participants reporting sleep-related SC 6.92 0.94 < 0.001
Participants reporting insomnia only Participants reporting sleep-related SC 5.1 1.15 < 0.001
Social well-being score Non-insomnia participants Participants reporting insomnia only 0.29 1.01 0.78
Participants reporting sleep-related SC 1.9 0.9 0.054
Participants reporting insomnia only Participants reporting sleep-related SC 1.6 1.21 0.178
Overall QOL score Non-insomnia participants Participants reporting insomnia only 5.09 2.7 0.061
Participants reporting sleep-related SC 21.9 2.6 < 0.001
Participants reporting insomnia only Participants reporting sleep-related SC 16.85 3.2 < 0.001
Table 6 Measuring sleep parameters in patients with insomnia and non-
insomnia
Number Mean (min) SD p
Actigraph
Average true sleep 0.7
Non-insomnia 111 360.01 71.14
Insomnia 84 363.75 85.50
Average total night sleep 0.4
Non-insomnia 111 397.63 74.89
Insomnia 84 407.95 91.51
Average midnight awakenings Time 0.3
Non-insomnia 111 1.25 1.12
Insomnia 84 1.40 1.1
Sleep efficiency 0.9
Non-insomnia 111 91% 8%
Insomnia 84 89% 5%
Waking up after sleep onset 0.7
Non-insomnia 111 37.62 27.46
Insomnia 84 44.20 23.1
Sleep log
Average total sleep time 0.2
Non-insomnia 86 376.39 86.59
Insomnia 56 354.82 120.33
Average midnight awakenings Time 0.54
Non-insomnia 86 1.7 1.15
Insomnia 56 1.83 1.39
Sleep Breath
an attempt to cope with sleeplessness, might try the above
sleep behaviors, but as these become habits, insomnia persists
for long term [21]. In addition, individuals with persistent
insomnia, possibly including those with cancer, tend to en-
gage in sleep-interfering activities in their bedroom for staying
awake rather than inducing sleep (e.g., watching TV, listening
to music, eating, working or reading in bed or the bedroom).
These behaviors tend to weaken the association between cer-
tain normally sleep-inducing stimuli (bed, bedtime, and bed-
room) and sleep [32]. Furthermore, sleep efficiency in our
study may be misrepresented, as there are inherent weak-
nesses in its measurement when there is no standardized time
in bed. Finally, as ISI measures sleep complaints in the past
2 weeks and diagnostic criteria for insomnia disorder require
at least 3 months of sleep complaints [61], the insomnia rates
reported in this study may not meet the full diagnostic criteria
of chronic insomnia.
The results of the study confirm the high prevalence of
insomnia among cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy.
In addition, insomnia and sleep-related SCs significantly re-
duced the patients quality of life. Approximately half of the
insomnia burden in the sample was accounted for by the sleep-
related SC while the other half was experienced only insom-
nia. This finding suggests that insomnia is driven both by
shared and unique mechanisms. The results from this study
also indicate that insomnia is a subjective symptom, and the
patientsperception of insomnia or quality of sleep may differ
from the actual objectively measured insomnia severity they
experience. The results highlight a high unmet need in this
population requiring interventions to help patients manage
these symptoms.
Acknowledgments We would like to thank all the participants for their
voluntary contribution to the study. We would like to thank Dr. Nguyen
Thi Hoai Nga, Dr. Le Thanh Duc, Dr. Nguyen Trung Kien, Ms. Quach
Thi Viet Huong, and Ms. Le Thi Tuyen from Vietnam national Cancer
Hospital; Mr. Nguyen Cong Binh, Dr. Le Thi Le Quyen, Dr. Nguyen
Trong Hieu, Dr. Le Thu Ha, Ms. Nguyen Phuong Thao, and Ms.
Nguyen Hong Van from Hanoi Oncology Hospital; Prof. Mai Trong
Khoa and Dr. Nguyen Van Thai from The Nuclear Medicine and
Oncology Center of Bach Mai hospital for their great assistant during
the data collection. We are also thankful to Dr. Paul Lee from the
School of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University for providing
the Actigraph devices and helping us analyze data from Actigraph.
Compliance with ethical standards
The study obtained ethical approval from the Human Subject Ethics
Board, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University (Hong Kong SAR), and
Hanoi School of Public Health (Vietnam).
Conflict of interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of
interest.
Ethical approval All procedures performed in this study were in accor-
dance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national re-
search committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later
amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was ob-
tained from all individual participants included in the study.
References
1. Romito F, Cormio C, De Padova S, Lorusso V, Berio MA, Fimiani
F, Piattelli A, Palazzo S, Abram G, DudineL, Guglielmi A, Galise I,
Romito S, Mattioli V (2014) Patients attitudes towards sleep distur-
bances during chemotherapy. European Journal of Cancer Care
23(3):385393. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecc.12106
2. Tian J, Chen GL, Zhang HR (2015) Sleep status of cervical cancer
patients and predictors of poor sleep quality during adjuvant thera-
py. Support CareCancer 23(5):14011408. https://doi.org/10.1007/
s00520-014-2493-8
3. Savard J, Ivers H, Savard MH, Morin CM (2015) Cancer treatments
and their side effects are associated with aggravation of insomnia:
results of a longitudinal study. Cancer 121(10):17031711. https://
doi.org/10.1002/cncr.29244
4. Palesh OG, Roscoe JA, Mustian KM, Roth T, Savard J, Ancoli-
Israel S, Heckler C, Purnell JQ, Janelsins MC, Morrow GR (2010)
Prevalence, demographics, and psychological associations of sleep
disruption in patients with cancer: University of Rochester Cancer
Center-Community Clinical Oncology Program. J Clin Oncol
28(2):292298. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2009.22.5011
5. Davis MP, Khoshknabi D, Walsh D, Lagman R, Platt A (2014)
Insomnia in patients with advanced cancer. Am J Hosp Palliat
Care 31(4):365373. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049909113485804
6. Shao Y-J, Ji K, Hao J-L, Cheng X-J, Guan B-Q, Liu W-S, Wang K
(2016) Nonpain symptom prevalence and intensity of inpatients
with moderate to severe cancer pain in China. Am J Hosp Palliat
Med 33(5):448455. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049909114565109
7. Billiard M, Bentley A (2004) Is insomnia best categorized as a
symptom or a disease? Sleep Med 5(Suppl 1):S35S40
8. Medic G, Wille M, Hemels ME (2017) Short- and long-term health
consequences of sleep disruption. Nat Sci Sleep 9:151161. https://
doi.org/10.2147/NSS.S134864
9. Zhang X, Giovannucci EL, Wu K, Gao X, Hu F, Ogino S,
Schernhammer ES, Fuchs CS, Redline S, Willett WC, Ma J
(2013) Associations of self-reported sleep duration and snoring
with colorectal cancer risk in men and women. Sleep 36(5):681
688. https://doi.org/10.5665/sleep.2626
10. Luo J, Sands M, Wactawski-Wende J, Song Y, Margolis KL (2013)
Sleep disturbance and incidence of thyroid cancer in postmeno-
pausal women the Womens Health Initiative. Am J Epidemiol
177(1):4249. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kws193
11. Fang H-F, Miao N-F, Chen C-D, Sithole T, Chung M-H (2015) Risk
of cancer in patients with insomnia, parasomnia, and obstructive
sleep apnea: a nationwide nested case-control study. J Cancer
6(11):11401147. https://doi.org/10.7150/jca.12490
12. Cheung V, Yuen VM, Wong GTC, Choi SW (2019) The effect of
sleep deprivation and disruption on DNA damage and health of
doctors. Anaesthesia 74:434440. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.
14533
13. Davidson JR, MacLean AW, Brundage MD, Schulze K (2002)
Sleep disturbance in cancer patients. Soc Sci Med 54(9):13091321
14. Vargas S, Wohlgemuth WK, Antoni MH, Lechner SC, Holley HA,
Carver CS (2010) Sleep dysfunction and psychosocial adaptation
among women undergoing treatment for non-metastatic breast can-
cer. Psycho-Oncology 19(6):669673. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.
1603
15. Phillips KM, Jim HS, Donovan KA, Pinder-Schenck MC, Jacobsen
PB (2012) Characteristics and correlates of sleep disturbances in
cancer patients. Support Care Cancer 20(2):357365. https://doi.
org/10.1007/s00520-011-1106-z
Sleep Breath
16. Collins KP, Geller DA, Antoni M, Donnell DM, Tsung A, Marsh
JW, Burke L, Penedo F, Terhorst L, Kamarck TW, Greene A,
Buysse DJ, Steel JL (2017) Sleep duration is associated with sur-
vival in advanced cancer patients. Sleep Med 32:208212. https://
doi.org/10.1016/j.sleep.2016.06.041
17. Dahiya S, Ahluwalia MS, Walia HK (2013) Sleep disturbances in
cancer patients: underrecognized and undertreated. Cleve Clin J
Med 80(11):722732. https://doi.org/10.3949/ccjm.80a.12170
18. Savard J, Morin CM (2001) Insomnia in the context of cancer: a
review of a neglected problem. J Clin Oncol 19(3):895908
19. ODonnell JF (2004) Insomnia in cancer patients. Clin Cornerstone
6(1):S6S14. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1098-3597(05)80002-X
20. Raghava R, Induru DW (2014) Cancer-related insomnia. Am J
Hosp Palliat Med 3(7):777785
21. Lowery AE (2015) Sleep and cancer. In: Psycho-oncology. Oxford
University Press, Oxford, pp 231238. https://doi.org/10.1093/
med/9780199363315.003.0030
22. Otte JL, Carpenter JS, Manchanda S, Rand KL, Skaar TC, Weaver
M, Chernyak Y, Zhong X, Igega C, Landis CA (2015) Systematic
review of sleep disorders in cancer patients: can the prevalence of
sleep disorders be ascertained? Cancer Med 4(2):183200. https://
doi.org/10.1002/cam4.356
23. Dodd MJ, Miaskowski C, Paul SM (2001) Symptom clusters and
their effect on the functional status of patients with cancer. Oncol
Nurs Forum 28(3):465470
24. Molassiotis A, Wengström Y, Kearney N (2010) Symptom cluster
patterns during the first year after diagnosis with cancer. J Pain
Symptom Manag 39(5):847858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
jpainsymman.2009.09.012
25. Okuyama T, Akechi T, Kugaya A, Okamura H, Imoto S, Nakano T,
Mikami I, Hosaka T, Uchitomi Y (2000) Factors correlated with
fatigue in disease-free breast cancer patients: application of the
Cancer Fatigue Scale. Support Care Cancer 8(3):215222
26. Chen ML, Tseng HC (2006) Symptom clusters in cancer patients.
Support Care Cancer 14(8):825830. https://doi.org/10.1007/
s00520-006-0019-8
27. Ivanova MO, Ionova TI, Kalyadina SA, Uspenskaya OS,
Kishtovich AV, Guo H, Mendoza TR, Novik A, Cleeland CS,
Wang XS (2005) Cancer-related symptom assessment in Russia:
validation and utility of the Russian M. D. Anderson Symptom
Inventory. J Pain Symptom Manag 30(5):443453. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2005.04.015
28. Hoffman AJ, Given BA, von Eye A, Gift AG, Given CW (2007)
Relationships among pain, fatigue, insomnia, and gender in persons
with lung cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum 34(4):785792. https://doi.
org/10.1188/07.onf.785-792
29. Savard J, Simard S, Hervouet S, Ivers H, Lacombe L, Fradet Y
(2005) Insomnia in men treated with radical prostatectomy for pros-
tate cancer. Psycho-Oncology 14(2):147156. https://doi.org/10.
1002/pon.830
30. Gehrman PR, Garland SN, Matura LA, Mao J (2016) Insomnia in
breast cancer: independent symptom or symptom cluster? Palliat
Support Care:17
31. Ho SY, Rohan KJ, Parent J, Tager FA, McKinley PS (2015) A
longitudinal study of depression, fatigue, and sleep disturbances
as a symptom cluster in women with breast cancer. J Pain
Symptom Manag 49(4):707715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
jpainsymman.2014.09.009
32. Morin CM, Belleville G, Bélanger L, Ivers H (2011) The Insomnia
Severity Index: psychometric indicators to detect insomnia cases
and evaluate treatment response. Sleep 34(5):601608. https://doi.
org/10.1093/sleep/34.5.601
33. Long NH, Thanasilp S, Thato R (2016) A causal model for fatigue
in lung cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. Eur J Oncol Nurs
21:242247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejon.2015.10.010
34. Ancoli-Israel S, Martin JL, Blackwell T, Buenaver L, Liu L,
Meltzer LJ, Sadeh A, Spira AP, Taylor DJ (2015) The SBSM guide
to actigraphy monitoring: clinical and research applications. Behav
Sleep Med 13(Suppl 1):S4s38. https://doi.org/10.1080/15402002.
2015.1046356
35. Lee PH, Suen LK (2017) The convergent validity of Actiwatch 2
and ActiGraph Link accelerometers in measuring total sleeping
period, wake after sleep onset, and sleep efficiency in free-living
condition. Sleep Breath 21:15221709
36. Cella DF, Tulsky DS, Gray G, et al. The Functional Assessment of
Cancer Therapy Scale: development and validation of the general
measure. J Clin Oncol 1993:11:570579. http://www.facit.org/
FACITOrg/Questionnaires
37. Neubauer DN, Pandi-Perumal SR, Spence DW, Buttoo K, Monti
JM (2018) Pharmacotherapy of insomnia. J Cent Nerv Syst Dis 10:
1179573518770672. https://doi.org/10.1177/1179573518770672
38. Buysse DJ (2013) Insomnia. JAMA 309(7):706716. https://doi.
org/10.1001/jama.2013.193
39. Morris BA, Thorndike FP, Ritterband LM, Glozier N, Dunn J,
Chambers SK (2015) Sleep disturbance in cancer patients and care-
givers who contact telephone-based help services. Support Care
Cancer 23(4):11131120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-014-
2458-y
40. Savard J, Hervouet S, Ivers H (2013) Prostate cancer treatments and
their side effects are associated with increased insomnia. Psycho-
Oncology 22(6):13811388. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.3150
41. Ohayon MM, Roth T (2001) What are the contributing factors for
insomnia in the general population? J Psychosom Res 51(6):745
755. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3999(01)00285-9
42. Akman T, Yavuzsen T, Sevgen Z, Ellidokuz H, Yilmaz AU (2015)
Evaluation of sleep disorders in cancer patients based on Pittsburgh
Sleep Quality Index. Eur J Cancer Care 24(4):553559. https://doi.
org/10.1111/ecc.12296
43. Miaskowski C, Lee K, Dunn L, Dodd M, Aouizerat BE, West C,
Paul SM, Cooper B, Wara W, Swift P (2011) Sleep-wake circadian
activity rhythm parameters and fatigue in oncology patients prior to
the initiation of radiation therapy. Cancer Nurs 34(4):255268.
https://doi.org/10.1097/NCC.0b013e3181f65d9b
44. Savard J, Simard S, Blanchet J, Ivers H, Morin CM (2001)
Prevalence, clinical characteristics, and risk factors for insomnia
in the context of breast cancer. Sleep 24(5):583590
45. Perlis ML, Giles DE, Buysse DJ, Tu X, Kupfer DJ (1997) Self-
reported sleep disturbance as a prodromal symptom in recurrent
depression. J Affect Disord 42(23):209212
46. Berk M (2009) Sleep and depressiontheory and practice. Aust
Fam Physician 38(5):302304
47. Mercadante S, Girelli D, Casuccio A (2004) Sleep disorders in
advanced cancer patients: prevalence and factors associated.
Support Care Cancer 12(5):355359. https://doi.org/10.1007/
s00520-004-0623-4
48. Trudel-Fitzgerald C, Savard J, Ivers H (2014) Longitudinal changes
in clusters of cancer patients over an 18-month period. Health
Psychol 33(9):10121022. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033497
49. Clevenger L, Schrepf A, Degeest K, Bender D, Goodheart M,
AhmedA,DahmoushL,PenedoF,LucciJIII,ThakerPH,
Mendez L, Sood AK, Slavich GM, Lutgendorf SK (2013) Sleep
disturbance, distress, and quality of life in ovarian cancer patients
during the first year after diagnosis. Cancer 119(17):32343241.
https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.28188
50. The National Institutes of Mental Health (2018) Depression. https://
www.nimh.nih.gov/health/topics/depression/index.shtml.
Accessed 29/5 2018
51. Walsh D, Rybicki L (2006) Symptom clustering in advanced can-
cer. Support Care Cancer 14(8):831836. https://doi.org/10.1007/
s00520-005-0899-z
Sleep Breath
52. Redeker NS, Lev EL, Ruggiero J (2000) Insomnia, fatigue, anxiety,
depression, and quality of life of cancer patients undergoing che-
motherapy. Sch Inq Nurs Pract 14(4):275298
53. Alvaro PK, Roberts RM, Harris JK (2013) A systematic review
assessing bidirectionality between sleep disturbances, anxiety, and
depression. Sleep 36(7):10591068
54. Ruivo Marques D, Clemente V, Allen Gomes A, de Azevedo MHP
(2018) Profiling insomnia using subjective measures: where are we
and where arewe going. Sleep Med 42:103104. https://doi.org/10.
1016/j.sleep.2017.12.006
55. Zorick F (1994) Insomnia. In: Kryger MH, Roth T, WC D (eds)
Principles and practice of sleep medicine. W.B Saunders Co,
Philadelphia, pp 483485
56. Landry GJ, Best JR, Liu-Ambrose T (2015) Measuring sleep qual-
ity in older adults: a comparison using subjective and objective
methods. Front Aging Neurosci 7:166. https://doi.org/10.3389/
fnagi.2015.00166
57. Grandner MA, Kripke DF, Yoon I-Y, Youngstedt SD (2006)
Criterion validity of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index:
investigation in a non-clinical sample. Sleep Biol Rhythms 4(2):
129139. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1479-8425.2006.00207.x
58. Silberfarb PM, Hauri PJ, Oxman TE, Lash S (1985) Insomnia in
cancer patients. Soc Sci Med 20(8):849850
59. Kay DB, Karim HT, Soehner AM, Hasler BP, James JA, Germain
A, Hall MH, Franzen PL, Price JC, Nofzinger EA, Buysse DJ
(2017) Subjective-objective sleep discrepancy is associated with
alterations in regional glucose metabolism in patients with insomnia
and good sleeper controls. Sleep 40(11). https://doi.org/10.1093/
sleep/zsx155
60. Manconi M, Ferri R, Sagrada C, Punjabi NM, Tettamanzi E,
Zucconi M, Oldani A, Castronovo V, Ferini-Strambi L (2010)
Measuring the error in sleep estimation in normal subjects and in
patients with insomnia. J Sleep Res 19(3):478486. https://doi.org/
10.1111/j.1365-2869.2009.00801.x
61. American Academy of Seep Medicine (2014) International
Classification of Sleep Disorders. 3rd edn. Darien IL, USA
Publishersnote Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdic-
tional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Sleep Breath
... Gangguan tidur pada pasien kemoterapi dapat diakibatkan oleh terstimulasinya HPA axis, yang dapat menganggu tidur fase NREM dan fase REM. Gangguan tidur juga dapat disebabkan oleh kebiasaan pasien yang berusaha beristirahat dengan melakukan aktifitasnya di tempat tidur untuk memulihkan kesehatannya, seperti menonton, makan atau membaca ditempat tidur (Bean et al., 2020;Ghofir et al., 2018;Hoang et al., 2020;Strøm et al., 2022). Selain itu gangguanq tidur bisa disebabkan karena adanya gejala psikologis (kecemasan, stress, depresi) faktor lingkungan seperti cuaca ekstrim, cahaya di ruang tidur yang selalu terang dan terlalu ribut (Potter et al., 2021). ...
... Peningkatan sitokin dapat menghambat tidur fase REM dan memperpanjang fase NREM (Mogavero et al., 2021). Faktor lain yang mempengaruhi tidur yaitu adanya kecenderungan pasien menghabiskan waktu lebih banyak di tempat tdur (Potter et al., 2021), jenis kelamin perempuan (Hoang et al., 2020), usia dan lingkungan (Potter et al., 2021). ...
Article
p> Background : Sleep disturbances, anxiety and fatigue are potential problems that can occur in chemotherapy patients. The aim of this research is to describe sleep quality, anxiety and fatigue in chemotherapy patients. Methods : Descriptive research with a sample of 47 chemotherapy patients selected by purposive sampling technique. Data were collected using a questionnaire. Results: The results showed that all respondents had poor sleep quality (100%), the majority respondents (61.7%) had moderate anxiety levels and the majority respondents (76.6%) experienced moderate fatigue levels. Conclusion: The results of this study illustrate that chemotherapy treatment in cancer patients contributes to poor sleep quality, anxiety and fatigue. So that the role of nurses is needed to improve sleep quality, reduce anxiety and fatigue in chemotherapy patients. Keywords: chemotherapy; cancer; sleep quality; anxiety; fatigue </p
... Further, the nonsignificant interaction of treatment goal and cancer type suggests that treatment goal is indeed associated with insomnia and is not dependent on the effects between treatment goal and cancer type. Interestingly, other work has demonstrated that insomnia occurrence and severity are not correlated with treatment-related factors [32], suggesting that future studies should more closely assess the distinct manner by which different cancer-directed therapies and treatment goals affect sleep. ...
Article
Background Insomnia is the most common sleep disturbance among cancer patients undergoing active treatment. If untreated, it is associated with significant physical and psychological health consequences. Prior efforts to determine insomnia prevalence and correlates have primarily assessed patients in clinical trials, in limited disease groups, and excluding important patient subgroups. These findings are likely to be influenced by research participation effects, which could bias outcomes. We sought to address these limitations in a large, real‐world sample. Methods Between 2018 and 2021, all patients seen at our institution were offered an electronic patient‐reported outcomes (PRO) questionnaire where they could self‐report on a range of symptoms based on the National Cancer Institute's PRO‐CTCAE. Medical records were abstracted for demographics and cancer diagnosis/treatment. We evaluated N = 9350 patients for whom there was complete data. Results During cancer treatment, 21% of patients reported insomnia symptoms. Demographically, prevalence was higher in patients who were female (22% vs. 19%), younger than 60 years of age (22% vs. 20%), non‐White (24% vs. 20%), and on public insurance (22% vs. 20%). Medically, patients undergoing palliative treatment were more likely to report insomnia symptoms, irrespective of cancer site (23% vs. 19%). The prevalence of insomnia symptoms ranged from 18% (genitourinary) to 23% (gastrointestinal). Conclusion More than 1 in 5 cancer patients suffer from symptoms of insomnia. It is important that oncologists and cancer centers routinely assess insomnia severity in their patients. Leveraging the use of existing patient‐reported outcomes at an institution may be important to help with the identification of insomnia symptoms.
... [1] Cancer patients not only have to face physical discomfort, but also must bear the economic burden, self-image disorders, anxiety and depression, and other psychological stress, which is a stress that seriously affects the patient's quality of sleep. [2,3] In cancer patients, the prevalence of insomnia ranges from 30% to 93.5%, [4,5] which is 3 times higher than that in the general population (9% to 33%). [6] Insomnia is a clinical syndrome caused by disorders of sleep and wakefulness rhythms and abnormal sleep quality, and it is a common clinical symptom in cancer patients during diagnosis and treatment, with difficulty in falling asleep, sleep disruption and daytime fatigue as the main manifestations. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background The purpose of this meta-analysis of current studies was to assess the efficacy of electroacupuncture for cancer-related insomnia. Methods A comprehensive search was conducted encompassing randomized controlled trials examining the efficacy of electroacupuncture in treating cancer-related insomnia across CNKI, VIP, Wang Fang, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library, and Web of Science, with a search deadline of December 26, 2023. The Cochrane manual’s risk-of-bias evaluation was used for quality assessment, while Stata 15.0 was used for the data analysis. Results Eight randomized controlled studies involving 537 individuals were finally included. Meta-analysis results suggested that electroacupuncture improved total sleep time [SMD = 0.68, 95% CI (0.31, 1.06)], sleep efficiency [SMD = 1.26, 95% CI (0.02, 2.50)], and reduced Pittsburgh sleep quality index [SMD = –0.44, 95% CI (–0.63, −0.25)], insomnia severity index [SMD = –1.23, 95% CI (–1.88, −0.58)], and sleep onset latency [SMD = –0.76, 95% CI (–1.36, −0.15)] in cancer patients. Conclusion Based on the current study, we found that electroacupuncture may have a better effect on insomnia in cancer patients.
... Furthermore, sleep problems were a noted risk factor for cognitive impairments in our prior report [28]. Sleep problems are pervasive among cancer survivors, with an estimated 40-80% of cancer survivors reporting insomnia during treatment [51,52]. Stress and anxiety due to a cancer diagnosis, fears of recurrence, and side-effects from cancer treatment are all plausible precipitating factors for new or worsening sleep problems [53,54]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background/Objectives: Cancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI) is common and distressing for young adult (YA) cancer survivors; however, subjective CRCI is often attributed to psychological distress rather than true cognitive change. Thus, we aimed to generate hypotheses regarding potential common biobehavioral mechanisms of CRCI and psychological distress. Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews with YA cancer survivors in peak years for frontal neurocognitive development (ages 18–30), and we asked them to describe their experiences with cognitive and mental health changes during and after treatment for their cancer. An applied thematic analysis was used to identify themes. Results: The participants were 20 YA cancer survivors who were, on average, 23 years old at diagnosis and 26 years old when interviewed. Five themes emerged regarding the connection between cognitive and mental health: depressed mood after diagnosis that decreased mental engagement, cancer-related anxiety consumed cognitive resources during treatment, a bidirectional “downward spiral” during treatment, frustration with forgetfulness, and self-criticism about long-term cognitive limitations. Additionally, participants described receiving minimal information about evidence-based strategies for managing CRCI. Conclusions: Future research is needed to examine common neurological mechanisms among symptoms of depression, anxiety, and CRCI and to address gaps in survivorship care for YA survivors with CRCI. Cognitive–behavioral interventions may address both cognitive and mental health.
... Cancer is a chronic and non-contagious disease encompassing a group of diseases characterized by uncontrolled and progressive cell multiplication and abnormal tissue development. 1 It is known as the second-leading cause of death worldwide 2 and the third-leading cause of death in Iran. 3 Although the most widely adopted treatments, such as surgery, hormone therapy, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy, have improved patients' longevity, these methods of treatment also leave behind several damages that, by diminishing quality of life, jeopardize any benefits of more prolonged survival. 4 Insomnia is a common psychological consequence frequently observed among cancer survivors following their treatment. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background While advancements in cancer treatments have improved survival rates, they also lead to adverse effects such as insomnia, which significantly impacts survivors' sleep quality. Objective This study explores the influence of cancer‐related fatigue (CRF), Fear of Cancer Recurrence (FCR), and psychological distress, with rumination serving as a mediating factor, on the insomnia experienced by cancer survivors. Methods The study involved 220 cancer survivors attending Shohada‐e‐Tajrish Hospital's oncology center in Tehran, Iran. Participants were selected through convenience sampling and completed several questionnaires: the Insomnia Severity Index, Fear of Cancer Recurrence Inventory, Cancer Fatigue Scale, Kessler Psychological Distress Scale, and Rumination Response Scale. Results The results showed that the tested model had a good fit, and the correlation matrix demonstrated significant positive correlations between CRF (0.46), FCR (0.15), psychological distress (0.55), and rumination (0.42) with insomnia in cancer survivors (p < 0.05). Notably, CRF (B = 0.356, p < 0.001) and psychological distress (B = 0.339, p < 0.001) affect insomnia both directly and indirectly through mediation by rumination, while the impact of FCR on insomnia was indirectly significant (B = 0.73, p < 0.05). Conclusion The findings suggest that interventions focused on managing rumination could be potential targets to alleviate insomnia and improve the sleep quality of cancer survivors.
... Various sleep problems can lead to decreased memory consolidation ability, reduced immune function, and consequently, impaired executive function, decision-making, and overall physical well-being. [37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45] According to the 2020 World Sleep Day event, the number of patients with sleep disorders in China is as high as 300 million, with the population facing increased sleep issues due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Research has found that among the elderly population aged 65 and above, only 12% are free from sleep problems, with the majority experiencing some degree of sleep disorder. ...
Preprint
Full-text available
Objective To investigate the association between preoperative and postoperative sleep disorders and postoperative complications in elderly patients undergoing radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 485 elderly patients who underwent gastric cancer surgery in our hospital from May 2020 to May 2023. Patients were categorized into groups based on the occurrence of postoperative complications within 30 days after surgery: no complications, mild complications, and severe complications. Clinical data of patients in different groups were compared and analyzed. Results: A total of 485 gastric cancer patients were included in this study, among whom 325 patients had no postoperative complications, accounting for 67.01%; 139 patients had mild complications, accounting for 28.66%; and 21 patients had severe complications, accounting for 4.33%. Comparison of Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) scores (preoperative and postoperative) among the three groups showed statistically significant differences (P < 0.05). Compared with the group with no complications, patients in the severe complications group and mild complications group had significantly higher PSQI scores (P < 0.05). Ordered logistic regression analysis revealed that preoperative and postoperative PSQI scores were factors influencing the occurrence of postoperative complications in elderly patients undergoing radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer (P < 0.05). A higher preoperative PSQI score was associated with an increased risk of postoperative complications, and similarly, a higher postoperative PSQI score was associated with an increased risk of postoperative complications. Spearman correlation analysis results showed a positive correlation between preoperative PSQI score and postoperative complication severity, as well as between postoperative PSQI score and postoperative complication severity in elderly gastric cancer patients. Conclusion: Preoperative and postoperative sleep disorders are closely associated with postoperative complications in elderly patients undergoing radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Higher preoperative and postoperative PSQI scores indicate an increased risk of postoperative complications.
Article
Full-text available
Objective Insomnia is common in patients with cancer. It has a multifactorial etiology that may include the disease process, adverse effects of anticancer therapies, and/or an association with other comorbidities. The purpose of this review was to identify risk factors for insomnia and suggest optimal management strategies. Methods We conducted a systematic literature review to elucidate the risk factors for insomnia and sleep disturbances in patients with solid tumors. The effects of sleep medications in this population were also described. Results A total of 75 publications were evaluated, including those on breast, lung, gynecologic, brain, head and neck, gastrointestinal, prostate, thyroid, and mixed cancers. We classified the factors related to insomnia or sleep disturbance in cancer into four categories: (1) patient demographic characteristics (e.g., age, marital or socioeconomic status); (2) mental state (e.g., depression or anxiety); (3) physical state (e.g., fatigue, pain, or restless legs syndrome); and (4) anticancer treatment‐related (e.g., use of chemotherapy, opioids, or hormone therapy). Overall, literature on the pharmacologic treatment of insomnia is extremely limited, although some efficacy data for zolpidem and melatonin have been reported. Conclusions Demographic characteristics, physical and mental distress, and anticancer treatments are all risks for insomnia in patients with cancer. The limited evidence base for pharmacologic therapy in this patient population means that healthcare professionals need to implement a comprehensive and multidisciplinary pathway from screening to management.
Article
Full-text available
Introduction Cancer-related insomnia (CRI), a significant concurrent symptom of cancer, profoundly impacts patients. Non-pharmacological interventions include cognitive behavioural therapy, mindfulness-based stress reduction programmes, bright light, acupuncture, exercise and music therapies and tai chi. These approaches, unlike pharmacological treatments, exhibit minimal adverse effects, without drug–drug interactions. They are a promising treatment strategy for CRI patients. However, a comprehensive comparative study evaluating the efficacy and safety of all non-pharmacological interventions for CRI is lacking. Accordingly, we aim to conduct a relatively comprehensive systematic review and network meta-analysis. Methods and analysis We will conduct an extensive search across various databases, including Pubmed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, Google Scholar, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), China Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), Wanfang and Vip databases (VIP). The search will focus on non-pharmacological therapeutic interventions related to CRI in randomised controlled trials published from the inception of these databases until 15 May 2024. The primary outcomes of this study will encompass the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), while the secondary outcomes will evaluate sleep parameters, fatigue levels, anxiety-depressive mood, quality of life and any potential adverse effects. Paired meta-analyses and network meta-analyses will be conducted utilising ADDIS V.1.16.8, Stata V.14.2 and V.R4.1.2. Bias risk will be independently assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool (ROB V.2.0), and the evidence quality will be evaluated according to Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) standards. Ethics and dissemination There are no ethical issues as this study did not conduct any experiments, surveys, or human trials. We will ensure that the findings are shared through pertinent channels. PROSPERO registration number CRD42023427752.
Article
Full-text available
Background Major cancer treatments can cause a wide range of unpleasant symptoms that burden oncology patients. Different symptom clusters (SC) among cancer patients have been reported in the literature. This study determined the prevalence of symptoms patients experience during chemotherapy treatment and identified symptom clusters among them. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted among 213 cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy in three large hospitals in Vietnam. Symptoms were measured by the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale. Results The most prevalent symptoms were lack of appetite (65.3%), difficulty sleeping (62.9%), dry mouth (57.7%), numbness (60.1%), hair loss (43.2%), change in the way food tastes (40.8%), and lack of energy (44.1%). Four symptom clusters were identified. Difficult concentration, pain, cough, and dizziness contributed to the first SC. The second one included lack of energy, numbness, change the food taste, and lack of appetite. Dry mouth, nausea, feeling bloated, problems with urination, hair loss, and constipation made up for the third SC. The final SC consisted of psychological symptoms, which were feeling nervous, feeling drowsy, feeling sad, worrying, problems with sexual interest or activity and difficulty sleeping. Conclusion The study demonstrated that respondents experienced various symptoms and symptom clusters during chemotherapy. These findings can be used to develop clinical guidelines for symptom assessment and management in oncology patients for healthcare professionals.
Article
Full-text available
Insomnia remains a common clinical concern that is associated with negative daytime consequences for patients and represents a significant public health problem for our society. Although a variety of therapies may be employed to treat insomnia, the use of medications has been a dominant approach. Regulatory agencies have now classified insomnia medications into 4 distinct pharmacodynamics classes. Medications with indications approved for insomnia treatment include benzodiazepine receptor agonists, a melatonin receptor agonist, a selective histamine receptor antagonist, and a dual orexin/hypocretin receptor antagonist. Both pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic advances with hypnotic medications in recent years have expanded the pharmacopoeia to allow personalized treatment approaches for different patient populations and individual sleep disturbance patterns.
Article
Full-text available
Sleep plays a vital role in brain function and systemic physiology across many body systems. Problems with sleep are widely prevalent and include deficits in quantity and quality of sleep; sleep problems that impact the continuity of sleep are collectively referred to as sleep disruptions. Numerous factors contribute to sleep disruption, ranging from lifestyle and environmental factors to sleep disorders and other medical conditions. Sleep disruptions have substantial adverse short- and long-term health consequences. A literature search was conducted to provide a nonsystematic review of these health consequences (this review was designed to be nonsystematic to better focus on the topics of interest due to the myriad parameters affected by sleep). Sleep disruption is associated with increased activity of the sympathetic nervous system and hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis, metabolic effects, changes in circadian rhythms, and proinflammatory responses. In otherwise healthy adults, short-term consequences of sleep disruption include increased stress responsivity, somatic pain, reduced quality of life, emotional distress and mood disorders, and cognitive, memory, and performance deficits. For adolescents, psychosocial health, school performance, and risk-taking behaviors are impacted by sleep disruption. Behavioral problems and cognitive functioning are associated with sleep disruption in children. Long-term consequences of sleep disruption in otherwise healthy individuals include hypertension, dyslipidemia, cardiovascular disease, weight-related issues, metabolic syndrome, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and colorectal cancer. All-cause mortality is also increased in men with sleep disturbances. For those with underlying medical conditions, sleep disruption may diminish the health-related quality of life of children and adolescents and may worsen the severity of common gastrointestinal disorders. As a result of the potential consequences of sleep disruption, health care professionals should be cognizant of how managing underlying medical conditions may help to optimize sleep continuity and consider prescribing interventions that minimize sleep disruption.
Article
Full-text available
PurposePhysical activity (PA) and sleep are important to health; thus, it is important for researchers to have valid tools to measure them. Accelerometers have been proven valid for measuring PA and sleep, but only one device does this simultaneously: the ActiGraph Link (ActiGraph, LLC); however, the sleep-monitoring function has not been validated. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive power of ActiGraph Link sleep parameters against a validated accelerometer (Actiwatch 2, Phillips Respironics Mini-Mitter). MethodsA total of 49 Hong Kong adults aged 18–64 provided valid data on both accelerometers on their non-dominant wrist for seven consecutive days. Epochs from both accelerometers were classified as either sleep or awake using seven established algorithms (Cole-Kripke, Sadeh, Sazonov, high sensitivity threshold, medium sensitivity threshold, low sensitivity threshold, and neural network model), and these data were transformed to total sleeping period, wake after sleep onset, and sleep efficiency. ResultsThe non-zero count data for both accelerometers (331,103 observations) were strongly correlated with a Spearman correlation of 0.83 (p < 0.001). The total sleeping period was highly correlated (Spearman correlation ranged from 0.74 to 0.90) regardless of the algorithms used. All algorithms yielded insignificant difference in total sleep time measured by the two accelerometers (p > 0.05) with a negligible effect size of d < 0.2. The agreement of sleep/wake status was high for all algorithms, with accuracy ranging from 93.05 % (Sadeh’s algorithm) to 96.13 % (Cole-Kripke’s algorithm). Conclusions Results showed that the sleep function of the ActiGraph Link performs similar to a validated accelerometer (Actiwatch 2) and provides an opportunity to measure both sleep and PA simultaneously.
Article
PURPOSE We developed and validated a brief, yet sensitive, 33-item general cancer quality-of-life (QL) measure for evaluating patients receiving cancer treatment, called the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) scale. METHODS AND RESULTS The five-phase validation process involved 854 patients with cancer and 15 oncology specialists. The initial pool of 370 overlapping items for breast, lung, and colorectal cancer was generated by open-ended interview with patients experienced with the symptoms of cancer and oncology professionals. Using preselected criteria, items were reduced to a 38-item general version. Factor and scaling analyses of these 38 items on 545 patients with mixed cancer diagnoses resulted in the 28-item FACT-general (FACT-G, version 2). In addition to a total score, this version produces subscale scores for physical, functional, social, and emotional well-being, as well as satisfaction with the treatment relationship. Coefficients of reliability and validity were uniformly high. The scale's ability to discriminate patients on the basis of stage of disease, performance status rating (PSR), and hospitalization status supports its sensitivity. It has also demonstrated sensitivity to change over time. Finally, the validity of measuring separate areas, or dimensions, of QL was supported by the differential responsiveness of subscales when applied to groups known to differ along the dimensions of physical, functional, social, and emotional well-being. CONCLUSION The FACT-G meets or exceeds all requirements for use in oncology clinical trials, including ease of administration, brevity, reliability, validity, and responsiveness to clinical change. Selecting it for a clinical trial adds the capability to assess the relative weight of various aspects of QL from the patient's perspective.
Article
Objectives: Sleep discrepancies are common in primary insomnia (PI), and include reports of longer sleep onset latency (SOL) than measured by polysomnography (PSG), or "negative SOL discrepancy." We hypothesized that negative SOL discrepancy in PI would be associated with higher relative glucose metabolism during non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep in brain networks involved in conscious awareness, including the salience, left executive control, and default mode networks. Methods: PI (n=32) and good sleeper controls (GS; n=30) completed [ 18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) scans during NREM sleep and relative regional cerebral metabolic rate for glucose (rCMRglc) was measured. Sleep discrepancy was calculated by subtracting PSG-measured SOL on the PET night from corresponding self-report values the following morning. We tested for interactions between group (PI vs. GS) and SOL discrepancy for rCMRglc during NREM sleep using both a region of interest mask and exploratory whole-brain analyses. Results: Significant group by SOL discrepancy interactions for rCMRglc were observed in several brain regions (pcorrected<0.05 for all clusters). In the PI group, more negative SOL discrepancy (self-reported>PSG-measured SOL) was associated with significantly higher relative rCMRglc in the right anterior insula and middle/posterior cingulate during NREM sleep. In GS, more positive SOL discrepancy (self-reported<PSG-measured SOL) was associated with significantly higher relative rCMRglc in the right anterior insula, left anterior cingulate cortex, and middle/posterior cingulate cortex. Conclusions: Although preliminary, these findings suggest regions of the brain previously shown to be involved in conscious awareness and the perception of PSG-defined states may also be involved in the phenomena of SOL discrepancy.
Article
Objective Sleep problems have been linked to increased risk of mortality in the general population. Limited evidence suggests similar relationships among people diagnosed with cancer. The aims of the present study were to investigate the type and rates of sleep problems in advanced cancer patients and examine whether sleep problems are associated with survival. Methods A prospective study of 292 patients with advanced cancers affecting the hepatobiliary and pancreatic systems were administered a battery of questionnaires measuring sociodemographic information, sleep, and depression. Descriptive statistics, ANOVA, Chi-square, Kaplan–Meier survival, and Cox regression analyses were performed to test the aims. Results The majority of patients were male (64%) and the mean age was 62 years (SD = 11). Fifty-nine percent of patients reported poor sleep quality; 43% reported sleeping ≤6 h and 2% ≥10 h; 40% reported sleep latency of 30 min or greater; average sleep efficiency was 80%. Of the 292 patients, 58% reported clinically levels of depression and depressive symptoms were related to shorter sleep duration (p = 0.02). After adjusting for factors known to contribute to survival, a curvilinear relationship was observed between sleep duration and mortality: short and long sleep duration were associated with increased mortality [linear term: hazard ratio (HR) = 0.485, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.275–0.857; quadratic term: HR = 1.064, 95% CI = 1.015–1.115]. Conclusions Consistent with findings in the general population, a curvilinear relationship between sleep duration and mortality was observed in advanced cancer patients. The high prevalence of sleep problems and link with mortality warrants routine screening and development of evidence-based treatments for sleep problems in the oncology setting.
Article
Objective This study examined insomnia in the context of breast cancer, both as an independent symptom and as a component of a symptom cluster that includes depression, anxiety, fatigue, and pain. Method Women with a history of breast cancer currently taking an aromatase inhibitor and who had completed cancer treatment at least one month prior to enrollment were included ( n = 413). Participants completed validated measures of insomnia, fatigue, pain, depression, and anxiety. Factor analysis was utilized to examine the extent to which these symptoms could be represented by common latent factors. Insomnia severity was then separated into a symptom cluster component (I–SC) and an insomnia-unique (I–U) component. The associations between each insomnia component and demographic and clinical factors were examined in multivariate models. Results A single-factor solution provided the best fit to the symptom measures. Some 53.3% of the variance in insomnia severity was captured by this symptom cluster (I–SC), with the remaining 43.7% being unique to insomnia (I–U). Unique patterns of demographic factors (e.g., age and body–mass index), but not clinical factors, were associated with each insomnia measure. Significance of results Approximately 50% of insomnia severity was related to the symptom cluster, with the rest being unique to insomnia. Different sociodemographic risk factors were related to the different insomnia measures. Stronger underlying foundations for the mechanisms of each component could lead to refined diagnoses and targeted interventions for addressing the overall insomnia burden in cancer patients.