ArticlePDF Available

Abstract and Figures

The genus and species, Sinuothrips hasta Collins, was identified based on specimens of both sexes collected from Phragmites and an unknown species of Asteraceae in Fars province. This genus is known previously only from England, Turkey, and China. A brief diagnostic character for the genus and species is provided and illustrated.
Content may be subject to copyright.
J Insect Biodivers Syst 04(3): 197202
ISSN: 2423-8112
JOURNAL OF
INSECT BIODIVERSITY AND SYSTEMATICS
Research Article
http://jibs.modares.ac.ir
http://zoobank.org/References/0B2B3542-F616-4D58-8072-E643EDC3FD92
Corresponding author: Seber sadeghi, E-mail: ssadeghi@shirazu.ac.ir
Copyright © 2018, Hakimara et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons
Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the
original author and source are credited.
The first report of the genus Sinuothrips (Thysanoptera:
Phlaeothripidae) from Iran
Mahsa Hakimara¹, Saber Sadeghi¹, Kambiz Minaei²* and Inci Sahin³
1 Department of Biology, College of Science, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.
2 Department of Plant Protection, College of Agriculture, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.
3 Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, Selcuk University, Konya, Turkey.
Received:
28 October, 2018
Accepted:
24 December, 2018
Published:
29 December, 2018
Subject Editor:
Laurence Mound
ABSTR A C T . The genus and species, Sinuothrips hasta Collins, was identified
based on specimens of both sexes collected from Phragmites and an unkown
species of Asteraceae in Fars province. This genus is known previously only
from England, Turkey and China. A brief diagnostic characters for the genus
and species is provided and illustrated.
Key words: Iran, new record, thrips
Citation: Hakimara, M., Sadeghi, S., Minaei, K. & Sahin, I. (2018) The first report of the genus Sinuothrips
(Thysanoptera: Phlaeothripidae) from Iran. Journal of Insect Biodiversity and Systematics, 4 (3), 197202.
Introduction
In the largest and most complex subfamily
in the insect order Thysanoptera,
Phlaeothripinae with 2935 species
(ThripsWiki, 2018), various attempts have
been made to recognise subgroups
(Priesner, 1960; Bhatti, 1992a, b). However
there is little phylogenetic evidence to
support most of these subgroups (Buckman
et al., 2013). Despite this, the tribe
Haplothripini is now well defined within
the subfamily Phlaeothripinae (Mound &
Minaei, 2007; Minaei & Mound, 2008).
In Iran information was provided by
Minaei & Mound, 2008 about four genera of
the tribe Haplothripini (Dolicholepta Priesner,
Haplothrips Amyot & Serville, Neoheegeria
Schmutz, Plicothrips Bhatti), and a fifth
genus of the tribe, Bagnalliella Karny was
reported by Mirab-balou et al. (2012) based
on specimens collected from Yucca flowers.
Subsequently, two other genera Karnyothrips
Watson and Podothrips Hood were recorded
for the country (Minaei, 2015; Miramirkhani
et al., 2016). In this paper, another genus of
this group is recorded and illustrated for
the first time from Iran.
Material and methods
The specimens discussed in this paper
were collected by beating flowers of plants
onto a plastic tray. The specimens then
were macerated in 2% NaOH solution for
1214 hours and mounted onto slides in
Canada balsam after dehydration through
a series of ethanols using a form of protocol
described by Mound & Kibby (1998). An
Olympus BX51 phase-contrast microscope
was used for observations on structure.
Photomicrographs and measurements were
made using this microscope with DP27
digital camera and CellSens software.
198 Sinuothrips hasta new to Iran
Terminology used in this paper follows
Mound & Minaei (2007). The materials are
deposited in the Department of Plant
Protection, College of Agriculture, Shiraz
University, Shiraz, Iran.
Results
Sinuothrips Collins
Sinuothrips Collins, 2000: 286. Type species
Sinuothrips hasta Collins, 2000, by monotypy.
This genus is distinguished from other
genera in Haplothripini by prominent
dorsal projection in head which is extended
beyond antennal segment III (Fig. 2) also
the presence of three pairs of sigmoid wing
retaining setae on tergites IV-VII. Despite
these, in one of females that were studied
here abdominal tergite III has 2 wing
retaining setae on the left while 3 are
present on the right side of the tergite (Fig.
7). Morover, in another female, tergite IV
has the same arrangement in the left side
but has 4 wing rataing setae on the right.
Sinuothrips hasta Collins
Sinuothrips hasta Collins, 2000: 286.
The species was originally described from
specimens collected in England on
Phragmites imported from Turkey (Collins,
2000). It was subsequently recorded from
Inner Mongolia, China (Dang et al., 2013)
and also listed from Turkey (Tunc &
Hastenpflug-Vesmanis, 2016) .
Diagnosis: Female macroptera. Body
brown (Fig. 1), antennal segment II light
brown in basal third but paler in distal, III-V
yellow brownish (Fig. 3), base of forewings
dark, major body setae light brown.
Head with prominent dorsal projection
which is extended beyond antennal
segment III (Fig. 2) with maxillary stylets
almost 0.15 of head width apart, retracted
to post ocular setae; postocular setae small,
not extending to posterior margin of eyes.
Maxillary bridge well developed (Fig. 2).
Mouth cone rounded. Antennae 8-
segmented (Fig. 3), III and IV with 1 and 4
sense cones respectively.
Pronotum transverse (Fig. 4), with weak
sculpture lines except close to posterior
margin; epimeral sutures complete;
anteromarginal, anteroangular and
midlateral setae not developed while
epimeral as well as posteroangular setae
conspicuous. Prosternum with paired
basantra and ferna, basantra wider than
long. Fore tarsal tooth present but not large
(Fig. 2). Mesonotum transverse, weakly
reticulate, with no microtrichia. Metanotum
with polygonally reticulate sculpture (Fig.
5). Fore wing constricted medially with 7-8
duplicated cilia. Sub-basal setae S1, S2 and
S3 almost pointed, arranged in straight
line. Pelta broadly triangular, weakly
reticulate (Fig. 6). Abdominal tergites II
VIII with weak reticulation antero-laterally,
II with 2 pairs of wing- retaining setaea, III-
VII with 2 pairs of wing- retaining setae but
in one side (the right) the posterior pair has
an extra sigmoid wing-retaining setae (Figs
6, 7), VII and VIII each with two
campaniform sensilla not close to each
other. Tube short, less than twice as long as
basal width (Fig. 8); anal setae longer than
tube.
Male macroptera. Similar to female in
colour and structure but smaller and the
dorsal projection of the head short, not
extending beyond antennal segment I (Fig.
10). Antennal segment III with 2 sense
cones. Fore tarsal tooth developed (10).
Aedagus rounded at the tip (Fig. 9).
Material examined: Fars province,
Khorambid, Bayan village, 1♀, 1♂, an
unknown Asteraceae, 3.ix.2015, leg.: M.
Hakimara. 1♀, the same data, Phragmites sp.
Distribution in Iran: Fars province (this
study).
Distribution in the world: Iran (this
study), Turkey (Collins, 2000; Tunc &
Hastenpflug-Vesmanis, 2016), England
(Collins, 2000).
Hakimara et al. 199
Figures 17. Sinuothrips hasta: 1. Female; 2. Head and fore legs; 3. Antenna; 4. Pronotum;
5. Meso and metanotum; 6. Pelta and tergite II; 7. Tergites III-IV.
200 Sinuothrips hasta new to Iran
Figures 810. Sinuothrips hasta: 8. Tergite IX and tube; 9. Aedagus and tube (male);
10. Antenna, head, forelegs and pronotum (male).
Discussion
The genus and species discussed in this
paper is readly seperated from other
Haplothripini by the dorsal projection on
the head (especially in females), as well as
the presence of three pairs of sigmoid wing
retaining setae on tergites IV-VII. Mound
(personal communication) spectaculated that
this thrips is probably common in the reeds
along the lower reaches of the Euphrates
and Tigris, so Fars province is a surprise, as
it is a bit more arid. However, all three
specimens were found in the north of Fars
province near spring.
The previous report of the species is
based on 12 females and 1 male that all
were collected on Phragmites australis
(Collins, 2000). In this study one female
was also collected on Phragmites sp. while
two other specimens were beaten from an
unknown Asteraceae. As all specimens
were collected in the same place in one day
it seems likely that the two on Asteraceae
were found accidentally. According to
Mound (2013) the small size and restless
behavior in thrips cause adults land on a
wide range of substrates, including plants,
on which they can not breed. As a result,
the unkown Asteraceae plant in this study
may not function as a host for Sinuothrips
hasta.
Acknowledgments
The first author is grateful to Hossein
Taghvaee, her husband, for helping in
collecting the specimens discussed in this
paper and supporting her during the
research process with patience and resilience.
The manuscript was improved through the
advice and criticisms kindly provided by
Laurence Mound (CSIRO Entomology,
Australia) and two anonymous reviewers.
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict
of interest regarding the publication of this
paper.
Hakimara et al. 201
References
Bhatti, J. (1992a) Family-group names in the
order Tubulifera of the superorder
Thysanoptera (Insecta). Zoology (Journal of
Pure and Applied Zoology), 3, 163168.
Bhatti, J. (1992b) The Order Tubulifera (Insecta):
Its characters and classification into
families. Zoology (Journal of Pure and
Applied Zoology), 3, 127162.
Buckman, R.S., Mound, L.A. & Whiting, M.F.
(2013) Phylogeny of thrips (Insecta:
Thysanoptera) based on five molecular
loci. Systematic Entomology, 38 (1), 123133.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3113.2012.00650.x
Collins, D.W. (2000) A new genus and species
of haplothripine thrips (Thysanoptera:
Phlaeothripidae) with a prominent dorsal
projection from the head. Insect Systematics
& Evolution, 31 (3), 285289.
https://doi.org/10.1163/187631200X00048
Dang, Li-Hong & Qiao, Ge-Xia (2013) First
record of the genus Sinuothrips Collins in
Phlaeothripinae (Thysanoptera: Phlaeo-
thripidae) from China. Acta Zootaxonomica
Sinica, 38 (2), 427431.
Minaei, K. (2015) Podothrips: first record from
Iran with a new species (Thysanoptera:
Phlaeothripidae). Turkish Journal of Zoology,
39 (5), 958961.
https://doi.org/10.3906/zoo-1409-38
Minaei, K. & Mound, L.A. (2008) The
Thysanoptera Haplothripini (Insecta:
Phlaeothripidae) of Iran. Journal of Natural
History, 42 (41-42), 26172658.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00222930802354159
Mirab balou, M., Shi, M. & Chen, X. (2012) A
newly recorded genus and species of
Haplothripini (Thysanoptera: Phlaeo-
thripidae) from Iran. Far Eastern
Entomologist, 240, 18.
Miramirkhani, N., Fekrat, L., Manzari, S. &
Sadeghi Namaghi, H. (2016) First record of
Karnyothrips Watson (Thysanoptera:
Phlaeothripidae) from Iran. Zoology and
Ecology, 26 (1), 1517.
https://doi.org/10.1080/21658005.2015.11
01309
Mound, L.A. (2013) Homologies and host-plant
specificity: recurrent problems in the study
of thrips. Florida Entomologist, 96 (2), 318
322. https://doi.org/10.1653/024.096.0250
Mound, L.A. & Kibby, G. (1998) Thysanoptera: An
Identification Guide. CAB International,
Wallingford. 70 pp.
Mound, L.A. & Minaei, K. (2007) Australian
thrips of the Haplothrips lineage (Insecta:
Thysanoptera). Journal of Natural History,
41 (45-48), 29192978.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00222930701783219
Priesner, H. (1960) Das System der Tubulifera
(Thysanoptera). Anzeiger mathematisch-
naturwissenschaftliche Klasse, Österreichische
Akademie der Wissenschaften, 13, 283296.
ThripsWiki. (2018) providing information on the
World's thrips. Available from:
http://thrips.info/wiki/ [Accessed 15
January 2018]
Tunc, I. & Hastenpflug-Vesmanis, A. (2016)
Records and checklist of Thysanoptera in
Turkey. Turkish Journal of Zoology, 40 (5),
769778.
https://doi.org/ 10.3906/zoo-1512-37
202 Sinuothrips hasta new to Iran
 SinuothripsThysanoptera: Phaeothripidae

1

1

2

      .
     
    
   ssadeghi@shirazu.ac.ir

Sinuothrips hasta Collins
Phragmites
Asteraceae



Article
Full-text available
Thysanoptera specimens collected from different parts of Turkey,and especially from northwestern Anatolia,were studied. Data are presented on 65 species,of which 33 are from northwestern Anatolia. The species studied are either new records for the Turkish fauna or new locality records within Turkey. The following 9 species are new records for the Turkish fauna: Bregmatothrips willcocksi (Priesner),Pseudodendrothrips mori (Niwa),Cephalothrips coxalis Bagnall,Chiraplothrips graminellus Priesner,Haplothrips arenarius Priesner,Haplothrips dianthinus Priesner,Haplothrips priesnerorum Pelikan,Haplothrips rabinovitchi Priesner,and Hoplandrothrips bidens Bagnall. A checklist of Thysanoptera from Turkey that includes 193 species is presented. References of the first records of the species involved are also given.
Article
Full-text available
Podothrips erami Minaei sp. nov. is described and illustrated from Fars Province in southern Iran. This is the first record of the genus from Iran. The new species is bicolored and conforms with P. denticeps Hood and P. distinctus Ananthakrishnan in bearing a lateral forward-directed tooth behind the compound eyes.
Article
Full-text available
Precise studies on the structure and behavior of thrips can be particularly difficult, due to their small size and restless behavior. As a result, many “host-plant” records are no more than casual “finding places” with limited biological significance. Definitions of “host-plant” are complicated by situations where a plant species provides an important feeding or behavioral resource, but is not used for breeding. Similarly, failure to clearly define some structures on a thrips body, often due to inadequate technical and microscopy skills, can lead to faulty interpretation of species identities and evolutionary relationships. This article re-examines some of these problems.Estudios precisos sobre la estructura y el comportamiento de los trips puede ser particularmente difícil, debido a su pequeño tamaño y conducta agresiva. Como resultado, muchos registros de “plantas hospederas” no son más que “lugares de encuentro” casuales con un significado biológico limitado. La definición de una «planta hospedera» se complica por situaciones en las que una especie de planta provee un recurso importante de alimentación o de conducto, pero no se utiliza para la cría. Del mismo modo, el hecho de definir claramente algunas estructuras en el cuerpo de los trips, a menudo debido a la insuficiencia de conocimientos técnicos y de destrezas con el microscopío, puede llevar a una interpretación errónea de la identidad de la especie y las relaciones evolutivas. En este artículo se vuelve a examinar algunos de estos problemas.
Article
Full-text available
The order Thysanoptera (Paraneoptera), commonly known as thrips, displays a wide range of behaviours, and includes several pest species. The classification and suggested relationships among these insects remain morphologically based, and have never been evaluated formally with a comprehensive molecular phylogenetic analysis. We tested the monophyly of the suborders, included families and the recognized subfamilies, and investigated their relationships. Phylogenies were reconstructed based upon 5299 bp from five genetic loci: 18S ribosomal DNA, 28S ribosomal DNA, Histone 3, Tubulin‐alpha I and cytochrome oxidase c subunit I. Ninety‐nine thrips species from seven of the nine families, all six subfamilies and 70 genera were sequenced. Maximum parsimony, maximum likelihood and Bayesian analyses all strongly support a monophyletic Tubulifera and Terebrantia. The families Phlaeothripidae, Aeolothripidae, Melanthripidae and Thripidae are recovered as monophyletic. The relationship of Aeolothripidae and Merothripidae to the rest of Terebrantia is equivocal. Molecular data support previous suggestions that Aeolothripidae or Merothripidae could be a sister to the rest of Terebrantia. Four of the six subfamilies are recovered as monophyletic. The two largest subfamilies, Phlaeothripinae and Thripinae, are paraphyletic and require further study to understand their internal relationships.
Article
Full-text available
In Iran, 4 genera and 27 species are recorded of the Thysanoptera tribe Haplothripini (Phlaeothripidae, Phlaeothripinae): Dolicholepta Priesner with 1 species, Haplothrips Amyot and Serville with 23 species, Neoheegeria Schmutz with 2 species, and Plicothrips Bhatti with 1 species. Identification keys are provided to these taxa. Three new synonyms are established: H. inoptatus Priesner is a junior synonym of H. globiceps Bagnall, H. iraniensis Priesner is a junior synonym of H. maroccanus Priesner, and H. scythicus Knechtel is a junior synonym of H. leucanthemi (Schrank). Reports of H. cerealis Priesner from Iran are considered to be misidentifications of H. tritici Kurdjumov, and comments are made on the identity of several predatory species related to H. subtilissimus (Haliday) and H. globiceps Bagnall. Several character states used for recognizing taxa in Haplothrips are discussed, and available biological data for each species are presented.
Article
Full-text available
Keys are presented to the 11 genera and 50 species, including 21 new species, of Thysanoptera in Australia that are related to the worldwide genus Haplothrips Amyot and Serville. These taxa belong to what, in recent literature, has been called the “Haplothrips‐lineage”, that is, one of the three major radiations among the 2700 species and 350 genera of Thysanoptera Phlaeothripinae. The group is redefined, and the available tribal name Haplothripini shown to be appropriate. The character states on which the definition is based are discussed, and a list given of the 34 genera worldwide that can be included. The Australian species in these genera exhibit a diversity of biologies. Three genera involve species that invade galls induced by other thrips: Androthrips monsterae (Moulton) from New Guinea is newly recorded from Australia; Mesothrips jordani Zimmermann from South‐East Asia is newly recorded from Australia, with two new synonyms; the Asia‐Pacific genus, Euoplothrips Hood, includes two species in northern Australia. Three haplothripine genera are associated with grasses: one widespread genus, Apterygothrips Priesner, considered polyphyletic, includes only one Australian species; the only known species of Dyothrips Kudo is Oriental but extends into tropical Australia; Podothrips Hood, a circum‐tropical genus of thrips predatory on grass‐living coccoids, has 11 Australian species, six newly described. One grass‐associated genus, Bamboosiella Ananthakrishnan, is excluded from the Haplothripini. An Oriental genus of leaf‐ and flower‐living species, Dolichothrips Karny, includes one species in northern Australia, D. reuteri (Karny); Membrothrips Bhatti in which this species has been placed is considered a synonym. Karnyothrips Watson includes two species introduced to Australia, both predators of coccoids. Priesneria Bagnall includes three species from Australia, of which one fungus‐feeding species is newly described. Xylaplothrips Priesner is a widespread but ill‐defined, polyphyletic genus that currently includes three little‐known Australian species. Haplothrips is the main focus of this study, and character state variation among the Australian species is discussed. In total 24 species of Haplothrips from Australia are recognised, 14 being new species. Also included are the following, one new generic synonym, four new species synonyms, and one new combination. The 250 species worldwide in the genus are usually associated with the flowers of Asteraceae and Poaceae. In Australia, several of the species are specific to flowers, particularly of Poaceae and Cyperaceae but not Asteraceae. Almost half of these Australian species are presumed to be predatory on other small arthropods, and two have unusual host associations—with salt marsh Chenopodiaceae, and with the sori of Dicksonia tree ferns.
Article
Several characters of insects of the Order Tubulifera are commented upon from two aspects -- to clarify the usage of some terms and to highlight their importance in this group. The terminology of prothoracic structures, such as ferna , basantra , and notopleural sutures is discussed. It is shown that the names prepectus , basisternum , and epimeral sutures, used respectively for these structures in literature for over 35 years, do not conform with the usage in comparative insect morphology. The use of the name pelta in current literature is misleading, often conveying variable and conflicting meaning by the same author(s). The nature of the ovipositor and the androsternal plate is also discussed. The structure of the sperm in the two orders Tubulifera and Terebrantia shows considerable differences, in spite of shared plesiomorphy in the side-by-side disposition of the nucleus, mitochondrion, and axoneme. The Order Tubulifera, hitherto classified into two families Phlaeothripidae and Lonchothripidae, is now classified into 9 families. Four new families are proposed: Allidothripidae , Andrethripidae , Murphythripidae , and Xeniothripidea . Two families Allothripidae and Hyidiothripidae are recognised, based on family-group names of lower rank now raised to family status. Urothripidae is revalidated as a family. A key is provided for distinguishing members of the different families.
Article
Karnyothrips flavipes (Jones 1912), which was collected from peach and mulberry branches infested with white peach scale, Pseudaulacaspis pentagona (Targioni-Tozzetti), has been newly recorded from Iran. It is also considered to be the first record of the genus Karnyothrips (Watson 1923) for the country. A brief taxonomic diagnosis is provided to facilitate its recognition.