PosterPDF Available

Does Dynamic Intelligence exist as a conceptual measure of self-awareness?

Authors:

Abstract

The poster maps the progress through my third year of my PhD research where I uncover in 4 studies the links between the use of thinking heuristics that I call Cognitive Intentions and the participants' level of self-awareness. The big data supports my hypothesis and I am now looking at a qualitative study to validate the quantitative findings of Dynamic Intelligence.
How self-aware are you? How do you know this? Are you aware of your self-
awareness?!
Can this self-awareness be measured, objectively?!
My research hypothesises that we are not self-aware and that we have
habituated Thinking Styles that can be deconstructed using!
specific Cognitive Intentions. This is how the research unfolded…
I discovered something called Meta-Programmes that describe certain intentions in our
thinking. As there are fifty of them, I thought these would be a useful way of deconstructing a
students thinking and then found a tool that used them to determine our thinking.
Research Questions:
1. How does the thinking of post-graduate students map against the Identity Compass?
2. Can I determine unique Thinking Styles from the combinations of Meta-Programmes?
3. Can I create a benchmark tool to normalise the IC output?
The final study is a qualitative study where I use a semi-structured interview to
tease out the important findings from the quantitative studies by asking the
participants if and how aware they are of using the Cognitive Intentions in their
thinking! The questions represent the facets of Dynamic Intelligence - Intention,
Awareness, Choice & Response.
Unfortunately, the results of the first studies was non-significant even though I created the measure,
which I called The Thinking Quotient and found a Thinking Style!
As I had permission to use the entire profile database (n=8,200), I asked the question: does the
data from 8,200 IC profiles support the findings of studies 1 & 2? Is there enough support for
Thinking Styles, Academic Thinking Style, Levels of the Thinking Quotient and the Intention,
Awareness, Choice & Response facets of our thinking as hypothesised in the Lit Review?
If it can, then there is a strong possibility that the concept of Dynamic Intelligence exists!
DOES DYNAMIC INTELLIGENCE EXIST AS A CONCEPTUAL
MEASURE OF SELF-AWARENESS IN THE MOMENT?
Thinking about your thinking is called Metacognition. The problem is, metacognition is predominantly about children’s
thinking and how they learn. I am interested in adult thinking and how we improve it. Meta-cognition refers to the
self-monitoring of one’s own cognitive processes and influences on them (Flavell, 1976). Gifted students have
often been described as being unique and qualitatively different from average students (Kanevs ky & Geake, 2004),
but in reality, there is little evidence for this (Perleth, Sierwald, & Heller, 1993). Students actively construct their
own knowledge and meaning from their experiences (Fosnot, 1996; Steffe & Gale, 1995).!So I wanted to find out
how does a post-graduate student construct their thinking in context. I needed to find a suitable measuring tool.
I discovered that in order to apply Meta-Programmes to students’ thinking, I had to understand what
the students’ intention was in the moment, and if the student was aware of this intention. The
awareness led me to consider the difference between the pairs, which was not being measured by
the tool. So I thought that a more appropriate name for them would be: Cognitive Intentions!
Future
Caring for Self
Re-Active
Achievement
Information
Activity
Long Term
Realisation
This time, the data IS significant!!!
And there are different dimensions at of
Cognitive Intentions combinations at the
different levels of the Thinking Quotient!
This suggests that the dimension found in the
previous study is in fact, an Academic Thinking
Style! This intimates that Dynamic Intelligence
exists as a measure of self-awareness!
TQ
Concrete
Sceptic
Difference
Realisation
Options
Polar
Quality Cont.
Distrustful
Away From
Future
Task
Abstract
Vision
Long Term
Observer
Things
Procedures
Short Term
Details
Consensus
Dim 1
Dim 2
Dim 3
FINAL STEP:
Darren Stevens, Ph.D. student, Year 3 - Supervisors: Dr Laura Taylor (DoS) - Dr Andre Soares - Faculty of Health and Life Sciences
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any references for this publication.