ArticlePublisher preview available

Intersectional Criminologies for the Contemporary Moment: Crucial Questions of Power, Praxis and Technologies of Control

Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the authors.

Abstract

This article reflects on the growing acceptance of intersectional criminology alongside emergent challenges of the contemporary moment. In light of social changes, the article asks: What is important about intersectionality and its relationship to criminology? How might we sustain and nurture these crucial dimensions and connections? Exploring answers to these questions, we consider how to retain intersectional commitments in areas of increasing importance, such as ubiquitous surveillance and technologies of policing. In discussing how we might examine and unpack the workings of interlocking systems of oppression and their effects, this article addresses how intersectional criminologists might reflect more critically on their methodologies to ensure robust analysis and incorporate frameworks that better capture the technosocial entanglements emblematic of ongoing shifts in social control. After reviewing approaches for doing so, the article concludes with a reflection on implications for intersectional criminological praxis.
Vol.:(0123456789)
Critical Criminology (2019) 27:55–71
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-019-09441-z
1 3
Intersectional Criminologies fortheContemporary Moment:
Crucial Questions ofPower, Praxis andTechnologies
ofControl
KathrynHenne1,2· EmilyI.Troshynski3
Published online: 19 March 2019
© Springer Nature B.V. 2019
Abstract
This article reflects on the growing acceptance of intersectional criminology alongside
emergent challenges of the contemporary moment. In light of social changes, the arti-
cle asks: What is important about intersectionality and its relationship to criminology?
How might we sustain and nurture these crucial dimensions and connections? Exploring
answers to these questions, we consider how to retain intersectional commitments in areas
of increasing importance, such as ubiquitous surveillance and technologies of policing.
In discussing how we might examine and unpack the workings of interlocking systems of
oppression and their effects, this article addresses how intersectional criminologists might
reflect more critically on their methodologies to ensure robust analysis and incorporate
frameworks that better capture the technosocial entanglements emblematic of ongoing
shifts in social control. After reviewing approaches for doing so, the article concludes with
a reflection on implications for intersectional criminological praxis.
Introduction: Taking Stock atCritical Junctures
In recent years, the rise of authoritarianism in various parts of the world has been met with
protest movements, as well as calls for inclusion, mobilization and resistance. Rightfully
so: in the United States (US) alone, the Trump administration has signaled its support for
establishing a registry to track Muslims, attempted to enact a federal ban against transgen-
der persons serving in the US military, and committed significant resources to enhancing
surveillance infrastructure aimed at racialized minorities.1 All the while, anti-immigrant,
anti-Semitic, homophobic, Islamophobic, misogynistic, racist, and sexist attacks have
risen since the 2016 US presidential election (Southern Poverty Law Center 2016). In this
* Kathryn Henne
khenne@uwaterloo.ca
1 University ofWaterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
2 The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT , Australia
3 University ofNevada, LasVegas, USA
1 Following Hochman (2018), we use “racialized” to acknowledge that individuals, groups, and structures
become racialized through worldly processes, not as a result of their inherent attributes.
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
... Furthermore, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and other legal organizations have proposed that these technologies broadly can infringe upon citizen's Fourth Amendment rights, which mandate that police cannot stop a person beyond "reasonable suspicion" (ACLU, 2016). While the SSL specifically has been recently decommissioned, predictive policing is a growing multibillion-dollar industry (Wang, 2018) and empirical research is needed to further critique how these tools may exacerbate preexisting, racialized inequities in the criminal legal system (Henne & Troshynski, 2019). ...
... Holding race at the center of analysis allows one to examine how racial social hierarchy is maintained through multiple systems of oppression and orients us to investigate bias, discrimination, and their consequences among racialized communities (Bonilla-Silva, 2002). At the same time, CRT allows for intersectional analysis, i.e., examining race in the context of other social identities and contexts to understand the unique experiences of individuals at multiple margins of society (Crutchfield et al., 2017;Dottolo & Stewart, 2008;Henne & Troshynski, 2019). ...
... Amongst researchers, legal scholars, and abolitionist organizers, there are many arguments and critiques 1 Latine is a gender-inclusive and culturally and linguistically relevant term for those of Latin American heritage (Blas, 2019). against predictive policing, yet advocates claim that there are no empirically associated negative drawbacks (Meijer & Wessels, 2019) and critical empirical analyses of these programs are lacking (Henne & Troshynski, 2019). Thus, our analyses assess whether the SSL risk score is racialized while accounting for the local spatial, socioeconomic, and racial characteristics. ...
Article
Full-text available
Predictive policing is a tool used increasingly by police departments that may exacerbate entrenched racial/ethnic disparities in the Prison Industrial Complex (PIC). Using a Critical Race Theory framework, we analyzed arrest data from a predictive policing program, the Strategic Subject List (SSL), and questioned how the SSL risk score (i.e., calculated risk for gun violence perpetration or victimization) predicts the arrested individual's race/ethnicity while accounting for local spatial conditions, including poverty and racial composition. Using multinomial logistic regression with community area fixed effects, results indicate that the risk score predicts the race/ethnicity of the arrested person while accounting for spatial context. As such, despite claims of scientific objectivity, we provide empirical evidence that the algorithmically-derived risk variable is racially biased. We discuss our study in the context of how the SSL reinforces a pseudoscientific justification of the PIC and call for the abolition of these tools broadly.
... Thus, it is crucial to look "beyond gender" in order to grasp the structural context in which it is performed day after day, as it intersects with other power relations such as class, nationality or race. 3 The entanglement between Connell's masculinities framework and other structural power relations has been-and still is-debated among scholars (see Hamilton et al. 2019;Henne and Troshynski 2019). In this article, I focus on gender, but I will also discuss interactions with other power relations. ...
Article
Full-text available
This article analyzes juvenile delinquency through the concept of “gender projects.” It argues that delinquency makes the embodiment of specific masculinities and femininities possible, and thereby contributes to “gender achievement” (or “gender accomplishment”). Drawing on in-depth interviews conducted with Swiss juvenile offenders and using Raewyn Connell’s (1987, 1995) notion of “hegemonic masculinity,” this article examines “gender projects” that boys and girls pursue through a variety of offenses and trajectories in the criminal justice system. By inscribing the youth’s delinquent trajectories in social space and by paying attention to the intersection of power relations they face, this article discusses how delinquency can be a tactic to sustain, produce or overcome gender hegemony.
... Through an analysis of reporting apps, this article illustrates how emergent questions of data capital should be considered in relation to interlocking systems of domination and oppression. It illuminates how an intersectional sensibility might enhance the analysis of technological solutions to criminological concerns specifically and data capital more generally (see Henne and Troshynski, 2019). Our aim, however, is not simply to demonstrate the possibilities of intersectional analyses of data. ...
Article
Full-text available
This article illustrates how racial capitalism can enhance understandings of data, capital, and inequality through an in-depth study of digital platforms used for intervening in gender-based violence. Specifically, we examine an emergent sociotechnical strategy that uses software platforms and artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots to offer users emergency assistance, education, and a means to report and build evidence against perpetrators. Our analysis details how two reporting apps construct data to support institutionally legible narratives of violence, highlighting overlooked racialised dimensions of the data capital generated through their use. We draw attention to how they reinforce property relations built on extraction and ownership, capital accumulation that reinforces benefits derived through data property relations and ownership, and the commodification of diversity and inclusion. Recognising these patterns are not unique to anti-violence apps, we reflect on how this example aids in understanding how racial capitalism becomes a constitutive element of digital platforms, which more generally extract information from users, rely on complex financial partnerships, and often sustain problematic relationships with the criminal legal system. We conclude with a discussion of how racial capitalism can advance scholarship at the intersections of data and power.
... Stereotypes of BIWOC portrayed through jezebel and deviant imagery serves to legitimize their harsher treatment (Hooks, 1986(Hooks, , 2014Williams et al., 2021). Stereotypes, combined with living environments more often surveilled by police (Harcourt, 2009;Henne & Troshynski, 2019;Jashnani et al., 2020;Steinmetz et al., 2017), compounds their risk of detection and punitive measures. ...
Article
This article draws on intersectional criminology to explore how privilege and marginalization shape women’s experiences in the criminal legal system. Utilizing a phenomenological feminist approach, the findings from this study were derived from semi-structured interviews and focus groups with 19 women under community supervision in Oregon. Using thematic analysis, we developed three themes: experienced racism and privilege, police profiling, and differential sentencing outcomes. The findings highlight gendered racism experienced by BIWOC and gendered racial privilege experienced by White women. Theoretical and policy implications are discussed.
Article
Full-text available
The aim of the paper is to consider the importance of intersectionality as an innovative theoretical and methodological tool for conceptualizing the social differences in the field of social pathology. In order to realize the goal set, we first approach the definition of intersectionality and its delimitation in relation to related concepts, while clarifying our own understanding of the concept, which we base on material directions within the approach of diversity politics and critical race theory. Unlike modern sociological understandings, contemporary studies of social differences theoretically rely on more complex approaches, such as constructivist interactionism, phenomenology, post-Marxism, gender studies, postcolonial studies, and critical theories of society, which focus on identity and subjectivity. The materialistic aspect of the critical approach and issues related to policies of distribution are mostly neglected, amid the dominance of the postmodernist culture of thinking, which often manifests itself as imprecise and unfounded. The initial impulse for writing this paper is precisely the effort to reanimate that repressed, material dimension. Then, the paper shows the advantages of using the intersectional approach in the research of critical analysis of public policies and critical criminology, so that the focus in the final part of the paper is directed to specific methodological topics and problems in the study of which the concept of intersectionality has proven to be important and necessary.
Chapter
This introductory chapter begins by outlining two common approaches to education for young people in custody. First, considerations of education in youth justice commonly refer to children’s rights. We outline key United Nations rights-based instruments, scholarship on rights-based approaches and the status of children’s rights in youth justice in Australia. Second, education has been considered both as a risk and as a protective factor in relation to youth crime. We discuss scholarship on both aspects, drawing particularly on the extensive literature on the school-to-prison pipeline. In addition, we pay particular attention to a dominant focus on access to schooling in youth justice centres, which, we argue, is insufficient. Bridging the fields of education and youth justice, this book offers a social justice analysis. We suggest social justice in general offers a powerful conceptual lens, before outlining in more detail the specific approach underpinning this book: the social justice framework developed by Nancy Fraser, centred on the notion of participatory parity. The chapter closes with an overview of the three empirical research studies we draw on throughout the book, as well as an outline of the remaining chapters.KeywordsYouth justiceCustodyEducationChildren’s rightsSocial justiceParticipatory parity
Article
This article calls for an abolitionist turn in Science and Technology Studies (STS) in order to engage with mass incarceration and the carceral-industrial-complex. Based on my ethnographic fieldwork in New York City jails, this article sets out to (1) argue for an abolitionist STS that intervenes in the racialized logics of “criminal man”; (2) offer the carceral body as arising from this abolitionist intervention into mass incarceration; and (3) illustrate how ontological multiplicities and critical phenomenology might be deployed as abolitionist STS tools. The premise is that ending mass incarceration requires philosophical interventions that resist the current racist, capitalist framework of the carceral-industrial-complex by disrupting the very foundations of reality. Abolitionist STS arises out of feminist and critical race STS as an intervention not only into criminology, but also into social theory’s ontological turn by attending to the interplay of carceral epistemologies and ontologies. When multiplicities, experientialities, complexities, contradictions, and power dynamics are drawn out, abolition is no longer an undoing but a proliferation that disinvests and contravenes carceral logics.
Article
Purpose This study examines predictors of suspect demeanor, the relationship between demeanor and use of force during stop and frisks, and whether this relationship varies across suspect race. Methods Multilevel models using 2018–2020 NYPD Stop, Question, and Frisk data are used to examine demeanor and assess the role of race and demeanor on use of force. Results Results demonstrate that race is significantly associated with officer perceptions of suspect demeanor and demeanor impacts use of weapon and non-weapon force. Specifically, calm suspects are less likely to experience both forms of force and upset, angry, and non-compliant/aggressive suspects are more likely to experience both forms of force. Although race was found to significantly predict demeanor, suspect race does not appear to moderate the impact of demeanor on use of force with a few exceptions. For example, non-compliant/aggressive Black and Hispanic suspects are more likely to face non-weapon force compared to non-compliant/aggressive White suspects and calm Black suspects are more likely to face weapon force compared to calm White suspects. Conclusion Suspect demeanor is missing from stop and frisk research, but findings suggest that race may shape perceptions of demeanor and demeanor may play an important role in understanding use of force.
Article
Full-text available
This article undertakes a global review of women's involvement in cultivation , processing, transporting and selling drugs. It is underpinned by twin theoretical concerns. First, we recap and critique the emancipation thesis, especially from a global perspective. Secondly, we examine how diverse global contexts shape women's involvement and the roles they occupy in these economies, challenging the notion that women's involvement in the drug trade is novel, increasing, or attributable to emancipation. Our review shows that women are ubiquitous to the drug trade and women's labor is fundamental to it. Rather than emancipation, we find that contextually-embedded experiences of gender shape women's involvement. We conclude by identifying and thematizing factors better able to explain women's participation in the illegal drug trade and guide future work.
Article
Literature on race and policing as well as place and policing has often neglected the role of gender. With an intersectional and ecological framework in mind, this study uses NYPD Stop, Question, and Frisk data to examine how the intersections of gender, race, and place simultaneously shape stop and frisks. Specifically, this study examines if suspect identity and characteristics of the stop location impact whether an officer pursues further action such as a frisk, search, summons, or arrest. Investigatory stops are not gender-blind, not uniformly experienced by all women, and do no operate identically across place. Evidence indicates that characteristics of place (concentrated disadvantage, racial composition) along with suspect race and gender might shape officers’ evaluations of suspiciousness and dangerousness. Research on policing practices and changes to policing procedures should consider how intersections of gender, race, and place shape officers’ actions.
Article
This article uses two dimensions of Black feminist standpoint epistemology to investigate Black political economy. It suggests that centering on Black women's experiences and analyzing those experiences via intersectional paradigms fosters rethinking the significance of family within gender, sexuality, race, class, and nation. The article concludes by identifying how these new views of family might inform gendered analyses of Black political economy.
Book
Simians, Cyborgs and Women is a powerful collection of ten essays written between 1978 and 1989. Although on the surface, simians, cyborgs and women may seem an odd threesome, Haraway describes their profound link as "creatures" which have had a great destabilizing place in Western evolutionary technology and biology. Throughout this book, Haraway analyzes accounts, narratives, and stories of the creation of nature, living organisms, and cyborgs. At once a social reality and a science fiction, the cyborg--a hybrid of organism and machine--represents transgressed boundaries and intense fusions of the nature/culture split. By providing an escape from rigid dualisms, the cyborg exists in a post-gender world, and as such holds immense possibilities for modern feminists. Haraway's recent book, Primate Visions, has been called "outstanding," "original," and "brilliant," by leading scholars in the field. (First published in 1991.).
Article
This article assesses the progress of and prospects for feminism in criminology. The focus is on the last 25 years of feminist research and theorizing about women offenders, victims, and workers in the criminal justice system. A general overview is provided of the directions of this scholarship, and key debates between mainstream and feminist perspectives are reviewed. The article also examines the contributions of feminist activists both within and outside the discipline to concrete social change for women victims and offenders. The article closes with a discussion of emerging trends in feminist criminology. New research and theorizing about women's experiences with crime challenge and subvert the traditional divisions and domains of mainstream criminology.