PreprintPDF Available
Preprints and early-stage research may not have been peer reviewed yet.

Abstract and Figures

In this paper, the two distinct properties of particle mass and charge are related, unifying equations for classical mechanics and electromagnetism that use mass and charge as variables for the electron.
Content may be subject to copyright.
1
The Relationship of Mass and Charge
Jeff Yee & Lori Gardi
∗#jeffsyee@gmail.com/
†#lori.anne.gardi@gmail.com
May 26, 2019
(revision 2)
Abstract: In this paper, the two distinct properties of particle mass and charge are related, unifying equations for
classical mechanics and electromagnetism that use mass and charge as variables for the electron.
Introduction
The electric universe theory studies the importance of electrical interactions from the smallest of particles to the
largest galaxies in the universe, with supporting evidence that “electricity” appears to be everywhere [1,2,3,4,5]. In
our recent paper Particles of the Universe Meets the Electric Universe, we apply the concept of wave energy to Ohm’s Law
to derive properties of the universe, illustrating that it indeed has electrical properties [6]. Amongst some of the
properties that were derived in the paper were Coulomb’s law and the electron’s mass. Here in this paper, we will
expand on the relationship discovered between Coulomb’s law, which is the force of particles with charge, and
another property of particles, which is mass.
Explaining Mass and Charge
From Particles of the Universe Meets the Electric Universe, an energy equation was established from Ohm’s law that
described the fundamental electric force. A version of the equation from that paper, Eq. 2.5, is slightly modified to
use a variable charge (q) in the equation for the energy measured at a distance, where d=r. The equation becomes:
(1)
The challenge with relating mass and charge is that they use different units, and furthermore, that neither are
expressed as energy. To relate them, the units of charge (Coulombs) is addressed first. In our previous paper, we
established that the units of charge can be expressed as wave amplitude, with units of distance, greatly simplifying
units for equations that utilize charge as a variable. If one assumes a substance in the vacuum of space that has a
physical property of kilograms, and moves as waves, then the following are descriptions of mass and charge:
2
Mass is standing longitudinal wave energy (without consideration of wave speed – c2)
Charge is traveling longitudinal wave energy over distance (force)
Fig. 1 The relationship of mass and charge as waves (electron in blue)
This explanation requires something physical, as the substance filling space between particles, that is the cause of
both mass and charge. It is not the purpose of this paper to debate whether this is a field, the aether, or something
else. But the components of the substance will be given a name for the purpose of explaining mass and charge.
The black dots in Fig. 1 will hereafter be referred to as granules to explain their motion.
In Fig. 1, the electron particle is highlighted in the center in blue. It is formed from standing waves as in-waves
collide with out-waves, creating a standing wave until the perimeter which becomes the electron’s radius (re).
Beyond this radius, waves continue as traveling waves as they cannot maintain their standing wave form too far
from the core as waves expand spherically and decline in wave amplitude. Granules collide and transfer energy
from one to the next at all points in Fig. 1. The only difference between what is measured as the particle and what
is measured as the force generated by that particle is simply the wave form.
The elementary charge of a single electron (ee) is the wave amplitude at the first wavelength. Amplitude is the
average displacement distance from equilibrium of granules. The displacement of granules will be greater near the
electron’s core and decrease in amplitude at distance, as granules collide and transfer energy to more granules as it
spreads spherically.
Now, because matter (measured as rest energy or mass) is formed from the same wave that has electrical properties
(measured as charge), they can be related both logically and mathematically. Logically, it is simply the type of
longitudinal wave: standing or traveling. A standing wave is stored energy as it has no net propagation of energy. A
traveling wave, by definition, is traveling energy.
Proving the Relationship of Mass and Charge
The energy equation from Eq. 1 is used to prove the relationship between the electron’s mass and its electrical
property of charge by deriving Coulomb’s law.
Mass
3
The electron’s mass is the stored energy of standing waves. It is the energy equation from Eq. 1 without
consideration of wave speed (c2).
(2)
For a single electron, charge (q) is the elementary charge (ee).
(3)
Eqs. 3 and 1 are substituted into Eq. 2 to solve for mass. When the distance (r) to be solved is set to the electron’s
radius (re) for the perimeter of the standing wave, it resolves to the electron’s mass [7]. μ0 is the magnetic constant.
(4)
Charge
Although charge can be expressed as energy, it is often expressed as a force, seen in Coulomb’s law for the electric
force. Force is energy at a distance.
(5)
The Coulomb constant is the magnetic constant times wave speed squared, over 4p. Coulomb gave it the letter k.
(6)
Substituting the Coulomb constant (Eq. 6) for the constants in the energy equation (Eq. 1), and then substituting it
into the force equation (Eq. 5), yields Coulomb’s law.
(7)
Units
As charge can be expressed as wave amplitude, the units for Coulombs (C) is corrected to be expressed as
amplitude, which in SI units is measured as meters (m).
4
(8)
Many electrical properties are based on charge, or based on amperes (A) which is defined as Coulombs per second
(C/s). Thus, electrical properties are inheriting incorrect units. When Coulombs is replaced with meters, or when
amperes are replaced with meters per second, electrical constants can be mapped to their mechanical constant
equivalents.
(9)
For example, the Coulomb constant (k) used this in this paper resolves correctly to be a force. The magnetic
constant (µ0) becomes a linear density.
Corrected SI Units
Mechanical Analogy
e, q
Charge
Amplitude
(displacement)
k
Coulomb constant
Force
µ0
Magnetic constant
Linear density
Table 1 – Correction and Explanation of Units
Conclusion
It is a simple way to express both Coulomb’s law and the electron’s mass from one energy equation. Logically, both
mass and charge can be explained as waves. And mathematically, the electron’s mass can now be expressed in
terms of charge (q/ee) and the magnetic constant (μ0), relating the domains of mechanical and electrical by equation.
Eq. 4 can be substituted into equations for the electron’s mass in classical mechanics to relate it to
electromagnetism.
References
1 Weimer, D. R., D. A. Gurnett, C. K. Goertz, J. D. Menietti, J. L. Burch, and M. Sugiura. "The current-voltage relationship in auroral
current sheets." Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics 92, no. A1 (1987): 187-194.
2 Arnoldy, R.L., 1974. Auroral particle precipitation and Birkeland currents. Reviews of Geophysics, 12(2), pp.217-231.
3 Kelley, M.C., 2009. The Earth's ionosphere: plasma physics and electrodynamics (Vol. 96). Academic press.
5
4 Alfvén, H. and Carlqvist, P., 1967. Currents in the solar atmosphere and a theory of solar flares. Solar Physics, 1(2), pp.220-228.
5 Southward, A.J., 1955. Observations on the ciliary currents of the jelly-fish Aurelia aurita L. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the
United Kingdom, 34(2), pp.201-216.
6 Yee, J., Gardi, L., 2019. Particles of the Universe Meets the Electric Universe. ResearchGate. Online:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330737944.
7 Mohr, P., Newell, D. and Taylor, B., 2014. CODATA Recommended Values of the Fundamental Physical Constants, Rev. Mod. Phys. 88,
035009.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
This paper gives the 2006 self-consistent set of values of the basic constants and conversion factors of physics and chemistry recommended by the Committee on Data for Science and Technology (CODATA) for international use. Further, it describes in detail the adjustment of the values of the constants, including the selection of the final set of input data based on the results of least-squares analyses. The 2006 adjustment takes into account the data considered in the 2002 adjustment as well as the data that became available between 31 December 2002, the closing date of that adjustment, and 31 December 2006, the closing date of the new adjustment. The new data have led to a significant reduction in the uncertainties of many recommended values. The 2006 set replaces the previously recommended 2002 CODATA set and may also be found on the World Wide Web at physics.nist.gov/constants.
Article
The current-voltage relation within narrow auroral current sheets is examined through the use of high-resolution data from the high altitude Dynamics Explorer 1 satellite. The north-south perpendicular electric field and the east-west magnetic field are shown for three cases in which there are large amplitude, oppositely directed paired electric fields and narrow current sheets. These data are shown to indicate that there is a linear Ohm's law relationship between the current density and the parallel potential drop within the narrow current sheets. This linear relationship had previously been verified for large-scale auroral formations greater than 20 km wide at the ionosphere. The evidence shown here extends our knowledge down to the scale size of discrete auroral arcs.
Article
The jelly-fish Aurelia aurita possesses external and internal ciliary currents that play a large part in food collection and in the transport of food, reproductive products and excretory matter. Adults feed on relatively small organisms, which are collected in mucus on all external surfaces and eventually passed to the inner surfaces of the oral arms. The inner surfaces of the oral arms bear two ciliated tracts which operate simultaneously in opposite directions. The lateral tract carries food materials proximally towards the gastric pouches, but is capable of rejecting inedible matter. The basal tract carries excretory matter distally, away from the gastric pouches and canals to the exterior. Rejection reactions are also found in the gastric pouches and radial canals, parts of which have currents moving in opposite directions on the roof and on the floor. These opposing currents appear to be derived from the system in the ephyra stage, where the circulation in the wide gastric cavity and blind-ending canals is maintained partly by centripetal currents on the floor and centrifugal currents on the roof. The directions of the main currents remain constant throughout the larval stages to the adult, although slight variations are introduced by morphological changes. The currents also remain the same during spawning, when the eggs and sperm leave the gastric pouches by the normal excretory path. Many of the ciliary currents found in Aurelia are present in other semaeostome and rhizostome medusae, but only in Aurelia do the umbrella surfaces and currents play a large part in food collection.
Article
Correlated measurements that provide information on Birkeland (field aligned) currents are reviewed. Because of the obvious importance of field-aligned electric fields with regard to Birkeland currents, the last section of the paper is devoted to a presentation of recent data on the observations of field-aligned auroral electron fluxes and monoenergetic peaks in the spectrum. Experimental data cannot yet define the overall magnetospheric pattern of the Birkeland current system. The largest body of data regarding these currents comes from polar-orbiting satellites. These data indicate that current sheets are associated with auroral displays and that field-aligned electron fluxes on the order of 1-keV energy are significant charge carriers for the conventional current out of the atmosphere. Rocket observations verify that electrons responsible for the production of auroral forms carry a significant fraction of the current necessary to produce local magnetic effects that require Birkeland currents for their explanations.
Particles of the Universe Meets the Electric Universe. ResearchGate
  • J Yee
  • L Gardi
Yee, J., Gardi, L., 2019. Particles of the Universe Meets the Electric Universe. ResearchGate. Online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330737944.