Content uploaded by Joaquim G. Pinto
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Joaquim G. Pinto on Jul 19, 2019
Content may be subject to copyright.
Content uploaded by Joaquim G. Pinto
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Joaquim G. Pinto on Mar 27, 2019
Content may be subject to copyright.
INTERDISCIPLINARY WORKSHOP ON EUROPEAN
STORMS
What: The seventh European Storm Workshop
gathered scientists and insurance industry
experts from 10 countries to facilitate an
interdisciplinary exchange regarding novel
scientific advances and developments in risk
modeling, allowing specialists with different
backgrounds working in European windstorm
research to discuss the priorities for future
research.
When: 10–12 October 2018
Where: Karlsruhe, Germany
FROM ATMOSPHERIC DYNAMICS
TO INSURANCE LOSSES
An Interdisciplinary Workshop on European Storms
Joaquim G. Pinto, Florian Pantillon, Patrick ludWiG, madeleine-SoPhie déroche,
Giovanni leoncini, chriStoPh c. raible, len c. ShaFFrey, and david b. StePhenSon
AFFILIATIONS: Pinto and lu dWiG— Institute of Meteorology
and Climate Research, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology,
Karlsruhe, Germany; Pantillon —Institute of Meteorology and
Climate Research, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe,
Germany, and Laboratoire d’Aérologie, Centre National de la
Recherche Scientifique and Université de Toulouse, Toulouse,
France; déroch e—Group P&C Risk Management, AXA , Paris,
France; leoncini —Zurich Insurance Company Ltd, Zurich,
Switzerland; raib le—Climate and Environmental Physics, and
Oeschger Centre for Climate Change Research, University
of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; ShaFFre y—National Centre for
Atmospheric Science, and Department of Meteorology, University
of Reading, Reading, United Kingdom; StePhe nSon —Department
of Mathematics, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Joaquim G. Pinto,
joaquim.pinto@kit.edu
DOI:10.1175/BAMS -D-19-0026.1
In final form 8 March 2019
©2019 American Meteorological Society
For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright
information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy.
W indstorms are extreme midlatitude cyclones
and one of the major natural hazards that
cause damage and losses in Europe. However,
the processes involved in their intensification and
generation of disastrous impacts, such as widespread
wind damage and f looding, are not fully understood.
Initiated in 2011, the European Storm Workshop
series (www.stormworkshops.org) brings together
the academic community, weather services, and risk
model developers from insurance and engineering
consulting companies. The goals are to stimulate
interdisciplinary research on midlatitude storms and
to bridge the gap between fundamental research and
practical implementations.
The seventh European Storm Workshop took
place in October 2018 at the Karlsruhe Institute of
Technology (KIT) in Germany. Over 60 partici-
pants from 10 countries discussed the latest results
and developments in windstorm research and its
industry applications, including 26 nonacadem-
ics. The workshop featured a total of 30 oral and
poster presentations split into three sessions, allowing
plenty of opportunities for exchange and discussion.
Presentations and the discussions they generated
focused on the dynamics of European windstorms
(extreme midlatitude cyclones), their predictability
and variability from weather to climate time scales,
risk assessments, and academic–insurance industry
ES175
JUNE 2019AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY |
collaborations. The workshop included keynote
lectures given by speakers from both academia and
the insurance industry. Highlights of each session are
discussed below.
DYNAMICS OF EUROPEAN WIND-
STORMS. The aim of this session was to discuss
new progress in understanding European wind-
storm dynamics. A major discussion topic was the
combination of perils associated with windstorms
such as extreme precipitation, severe wind gusts and/
or storm surges (so-called compound events). The
complexity of these events in terms of impacts makes
them a crucial topic for both researchers and the in-
surance industry. For example, Margarida Liberato
(University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro)
presented a consistent catalog of exceptional, high-
impact windstorms for Iberia, which lead to both
wind and rainfall extremes. Extreme events were also
the focus of the keynote by Helen Dacre (University
of Reading), who reported on advances in the under-
standing of the relationship between warm conveyor
belts and atmospheric rivers (Dacre et al. 2019). She
showed the importance of low-level cyclone airflow,
known as the feeder airstream, which originates
ahead of the cyclone and flows rearward toward the
cyclone center. Some of the moisture transported
by the feeder airstream is supplied to the base of
the warm conveyor belt where it ascends to form
precipitation, while the rest remains at low levels,
forming the leading edge of an atmospheric river. Lea
Eisenstein (KIT) presented a modeling study of the
first detected sting-jet windstorm over continental
Europe (“Egon” in January 2017). Devastating sting
jets are associated with strong wind gusts lasting for
a few hours over a distinct region located between
the cold and warm jet of Shapiro–Keyser cyclones
(Hewson and Neu 2015). Accurately modeling the
sting jet, which is essential to assess its loss poten-
tial, requires high spatial resolution. Convection-
permitting simulations show that the characteristics
of this storm were largely consistent with other
known cases over the North Atlantic and the British
Isles (Clark and Gray 2018), but the cyclone was
also clearly affected by topography over continental
Europe. Possible changes in the characteristics of
windstorms in a future climate were the subject of
Dominik Büeler’s (ETH Zurich; KIT) presentation.
Based on idealized studies, he reported that, while
the intensity of moderate cyclones may decrease in
a warmer world, an intensification is expected for
strong cyclones, which is partly associated w ith latent
heating effects. Such results are of great importance
for the insurance industry, as more windstorms have
the potential to cause higher losses.
PREDICTABILITY AND VARIABILITY
FROM WEATHER TO CLIMATE TIME
SCALES. This session discussed the current state
of knowledge of the predictability of cyclones on dif-
ferent time scales. Aiko Voigt (KIT) illustrated with
various examples the importance of cloud–radiative
interactions on the midlatitude atmospheric cir-
culation and cyclone activity. Understanding these
interactions is crucial for an adequate assessment
of climate change projections, as clouds are one
of the largest sources of uncertainty (Bony et al.
2015). Recent studies suggest that thermal radiation
effects can weaken idealized cyclones by modifying
potential vorticity (Schäfer and Voigt 2018). Given
that the cloud–radiative impact is important for
both weather and climate, a better understanding of
cloud–circulation coupling is needed to quantify the
response of cyclone activity to global warming. Len
Shaffrey (University of Reading) presented a critical
evaluation of the significant increase in Northern
Hemisphere storminess detected in ECMWF’s first
atmospheric reanalysis of the twentieth century
(ERA20C), which had not been reported in this form
by other studies. This century-long trend is appar-
ently related to a significant and unrealistic decrease
in surface pressure over the Arctic. This decreasing
trend in pressure is not seen in observational data and
leads to an increase of the meridional pressure gradi-
ent between the high and midlatitudes and therefore
of midlatitude storminess (Bloomfield et al. 2018).
Hence, the long-term storminess trends present in
ERA20C should be regarded with caution. Finally,
Florian Pantillon (Centre National de la Recherche
Scientifique; KIT) presented recent advances on
the prediction of wind gusts over central Europe
based on statistical postprocessing of an operational
convection-permitting weather forecast ensemble.
While ensemble model output statistics (EMOS)
substantially improve the average gust forecasts,
there are still a few cases which are poorly forecast
despite the use of EMOS (Pantillon et al. 2018). For
these cases, it is crucial to accurately represent frontal
convection, which is the source of some of the most
destructive gusts during windstorms over central
Europe (Ludwig et al. 2015).
WINDSTORM RISK AND INSURANCE
COLLABORATIONS. Applications of wi ndstorm
research were discussed focusing on the insurance
industry. One key aspect to improve the assessment
ES176 JUNE 2019
|
of windstorm risk is access to both observational and
model data. Alan Whitelaw (CGI IT U.K. Limited)
presented the operational windstorm service for
the insurance sector provided by the Copernicus
Climate Change Service. Expanding upon previous
efforts (Roberts et al. 2014), it provides an extended
database of windstorm tracks and high-resolution
wind footprints (https://wisc.climate.copernicus.eu
/wisc/#/). The new developments combine dynamical
and statistical downscaling to cover a larger number
of events. The use of numerical prediction models for
windstorm risk purposes has increased in recent years,
but they remain computationally very expensive and
are not easily implemented by private companies. As
an example of collaboration with the scientific com-
munity, Robin Locatelli (AXA) and Bernd Becker (Met
Office) presented a research partnership aiming at
providing hig h-resolution gust footprints for historical
events. These footprints were combined with claims
data to develop vulnerability curves for the European
market. Using statistical modeling, Dav id Stephenson
(University of Exeter) discussed various approaches to
quantify the dominant extremal dependence class for
realist ic windstorm footprints and found lit tle evidence
of asymptotic extremal dependency. When fitting the
data with statistical dist ributions, the Gaussian copula
appears to perform well, which allows the statistical
simulation of windstorm footprints (Dawkins and
Stephenson 2018). This approach opens the possibil-
ity of using geostatistical models for fast simulation
of windstorm hazard maps, which can complement
dynamical modeling approaches. Finally, one crucial
issue for the estimation of aggregated insurance losses
is the occurrence of multiple windstorms within a
season, a phenomenon known as storm clustering.
Based on high-resolution climate model simulations,
Matthew Priestley (University of Reading) showed
that serial clustering leads to an increase in annua l ag-
gregated losses of 10%–20% for return periods longer
than 3 years (Priestley et al. 2018). This was another
successful example of how basic research can have
important industrial applications.
CURRENT CHALLENGES AND FUTURE
PERSPECTIVES. Future directions and emerging
topics were debated in three breakout groups, which
covered a wide range of areas including new oppor-
tunities to further our understanding of European
windstorm risk. For example, the potential to reassess
historical windstorm risk through international proj-
ects on data discovery and the development of new
multidecadal reanalysis was discussed to overcome
the current limitations associated with the short his-
toric record. Similarly, new opportunities to under-
stand climate change impacts on future windstorm
risk will arise with the upcoming phase 6 of the
Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6)
and the High Resolution Model Intercomparison
Project (HighResMIP) climate model projections
(e.g., Haarsma et al. 2016). A better understanding
of the importance of the different cyclone relative
air flows (“conveyor belts”; Hewson and Neu 2015)
for total property damage was also identified as
a key priority. Other emerging areas of scientific
interest include improved seasonal forecasts of the
North Atlantic Oscillation (e.g., Scaife et al. 2014),
which might help windstorm risk estimation for
the insurance industry. Additionally, validation and
calibration methods of extreme storms were debated.
Given the limited sample size of the historic records,
there is a need to develop methods beyond the stan-
dard quantile mapping approaches in order to cor-
rect biases of extreme events. Overall, the breakout
discussions highlighted the strong synergy between
academia and the insurance industry in terms of open
research questions, providing compelling evidence of
the need for sustained collaboration and dialogue. A
general consensus was reached to keep organizing
future workshops. The program and presentations
are available on our website (www.stormworkshops
.org/workshop2018.html).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS. The authors thank all
the workshop participants for their contributions and
discussions. The workshop was made possible thanks
to support from the AXA Research Fund and the
Transregional Collaborative Research Center SFB/TRR
165 “Waves to Weather” funded by the German Research
Foundation (DFG).
REFERENCES
Bloomfield, H. C., L. C. Shaffrey, K. I. Hodges, and P. L.
Vidale, 2018: A critical assessment of the long-term
changes in the wintertime surface Arctic Oscilla-
tion and Northern Hemisphere storminess in the
ERA20C reanalysis. Environ. Res. Lett., 13, 094004,
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aad5c5.
Bony, S., and Coauthors, 2015: Clouds, circulation and
climate sensitivity. Nat. Geosci., 8, 261–268, https://
doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2398.
Clark, P. A., and S. L. Gr ay, 2018: Sting jets i n extratropica l
cyclones: A review. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 144,
943–969, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3267.
Dacre, H. F., O. Martinez-Alvarado, a nd C. O. Mbengue,
2019: Linking atmospheric rivers a nd warm conveyor
ES177
JUNE 2019AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY |
belt airflows. J. Hydrometeor., https://doi.org/10.1175
/JHM-D-18-0175.1, in press.
Dawkins, L. C., and D. B. Stephenson, 2018: Quanti-
fication of extremal dependence in spatial natural
hazard footprints: independence of windstorm
gust speeds and its impact on aggregate losses. Nat.
Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 2933–2949, https://doi
.org/10.5194/nhess-18-2933-2018.
Haarsma, R. J., and Coauthors, 2016: High Resolution
Model Intercomparison Project (HighResMIP v1.0)
for CMIP6. Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 4185–4208, https://
doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-4185-2016.
Hewson, T. D., and U. Neu, 2015: Cyclones, windstorms
and the IM ILAST project. Tellus, 67A, 27 128, https://
doi.org/10.3402/tellusa.v67.27128.
Ludwig, P., J. G. Pinto, S. A. Hoepp, A. H. Fink, and
S. L. Gray, 2015: Secondary cyclogenesis along an
occluded front leading to damaging wind gusts:
Windstorm Kyrill, January 2007. Mon. Wea. Rev.,
143, 1417–1437, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-14
-00304.1.
Pantillon, F., S. Lerch, P. Knippertz, and U. Corsmeier,
2018: Forecasting wind gusts in winter storms using
a calibrated convection-permitting ensemble. Quart.
J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 144, 1864–1881, https://doi.org
/10.1002/qj.3380.
Priestley, M. D. K., H. F. Dacre, L. C. Shaffrey, K. I.
Hodges, and J. G. Pinto, 2018: European windstorm
clustering and seasonal losses. Nat. Hazards Earth
Syst. Sci., 18, 2991–3006, https://doi.org/10.5194
/nhess-18-2991-2018.
Roberts, J. F., and Coaut hors, 2014: The XWS open access
catalogue of extreme European windstorms from
1979 to 2012. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 2487–
2501, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-14-2487-2014.
Scaife, A. A., and Coauthors, 2014: Skillful long-range
prediction of European and North American
winters. Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 2514–2 519, https://doi
.org/10.1002/2014GL059637.
Schäfer, S. A. K., and A. Voigt, 2018: Radiation weakens
ideal ized midlat itude cyclones. Geophys. Res. Lett., 45,
2833–2841, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL076726.
ES178 JUNE 2019
|