ArticlePublisher preview available

Advances in City-State Research, with an Example from Mesoamerica

Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the author.

Abstract and Figures

The last 20 years have seen advances in the understanding of city-states, especially in ancient Greece, where textual information fuels new theories about institutions and the ancient economy. Archaeological research makes significant contributions with data comparable across multiple city-states on settlement patterns, urban and rural development, political and ritual activities, and other materializations of institutionalized behavior. Using a new corpus of 74 city-states from Oaxaca, Mexico, I show that city-states differ from one another in patterned ways, and I argue that this variation depends on internal factors such as the social mode of production and external factors including place in regional and interregional exchange.
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Vol.:(0123456789)
Journal of Archaeological Research (2020) 28:3–52
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10814-019-09130-z
1 3
Advances inCity‑State Research, withanExample
fromMesoamerica
StephenA.Kowalewski1
Published online: 16 March 2019
© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019
Abstract
The last 20 years have seen advances in the understanding of city-states, especially
in ancient Greece, where textual information fuels new theories about institutions
and the ancient economy. Archaeological research makes significant contributions
with data comparable across multiple city-states on settlement patterns, urban and
rural development, political and ritual activities, and other materializations of insti-
tutionalized behavior. Using a new corpus of 74 city-states from Oaxaca, Mexico,
I show that city-states differ from one another in patterned ways, and I argue that
this variation depends on internal factors such as the social mode of production and
external factors including place in regional and interregional exchange.
Keywords City-states· Urbanization· Ancient economy· Postclassic Mesoamerica·
Oaxaca· Archaeological survey
Introduction
City-state societies attract our attention like coral reefs or old-growth forests that
impress with their bounty and intricate complexity of cooperation and competi-
tion. City-state cultures distinguish themselves from large territorial states, empires,
chiefdoms, and other social forms in that demographic growth is so typical it seems
part of their nature, as do flourishing commerce, economic growth, and greater con-
sumption. They also stand out for their innovation and cultural diversity.
Mogens Herman Hansen is the major scholar of our time on the subject of city-
states. Based at his Copenhagen Polis Centre, he compiled a massive dataset of
Archaic and Classical Greek city-states (Hansen 2006). He drew in dozens of schol-
ars to contribute case studies from around the world (Hansen 2000, 2002). Hansen
published his conclusions about city-states in general and the Greek polis in particu-
lar in a wonderfully succinct article titled “95 theses about the Greek polis in the
* Stephen A. Kowalewski
skowalew@uga.edu
1 Department ofAnthropology, University ofGeorgia, Athens, GA30602, USA
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
... However, in the middle part of Eurasia, where the history of agriculture is relatively shorter [19], the onset of urbanism has often been overlooked. Since the trajectory and characteristics of urbanization in different zones might be distinctive due to disparate cultural traditions and geographic settings [20], the observation and definition of urbanization also varies based upon different archaeological perspectives [21][22][23][24][25][26][27]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Urbanization is one of the milestones in the development of human society. Many regions in the southern parts of ‘the old world’ demonstrating an early emergence of agriculture also witnessed the flourishing of some of the earliest cities. Recent, yet still sparse, archaeological evidence appears to indicate a relatively later time for early urbanism in central Eurasia. However, given its vital geographic location and cultural nexus between East and West, more attention should be paid to the sedentary communities and their cities in oases amid the vast droughty desert, particularly in light of the rapidly increasing number of publications on early pastoralism and related communication routes along mountain chains and rivers. This study reveals the trajectory of urbanization and its role in the establishment of an exchange network in Xinjiang’s oasis region via reconstruction of the chronological sequence of the local societal history of the Baiyang River Basin along the southern piedmont of the Eastern Tianshan Mountains. A thorough archaeological investigation and refined radiocarbon dating programme was carried out and coupled with information from historical documentation within a Bayesian statistical framework. The results indicate three pulses of local urbanization during: the Early Iron Age, Tang–Yuan period, and Qing Dynasty, respectively. Combining this with evidence from other parts of Xinjiang, we re-evaluate the role of oasis urbanism in the promotion of trans-regional exchange.
... To proceed from the study of regions and social fields to conceptual understandings of longterm change, a key is to parse the culture historical baggage, which has conflated cultural and political units and also modeled cultural units or societies as homogeneous and bounded. Such conflations are problematic for a suite of reasons beginning with the rather ample archaeological and historical record that has repeatedly noted contexts [e.g., late prehispanic Oaxaca (e.g., , Kowalewski 2020, archaic Greece (e.g., Ma 2003, Snodgrass 1986), Classic Maya (e.g., Martin 2020)] where numerous small polities, city-states, and other peer polities coexisted, jockeyed for preeminence, and yet shared a basic cultural tradition. A second issue is that longterm change does not follow uniform or directed paths; social relational shifts in scale, complexity, and connectivity (integration) rarely occur in precisely parallel or consistent ways, and so the decoupling of these parameters is required to examine them in relation to each other (Blanton et al. 1993, Kienlin 2012. ...
Article
In archaeology, along with a large sector of other social sciences, comparative approaches to long-term political change over the last two centuries have been underpinned by two big ideas, classification and evolution, which often have been manifest as cultural history and progress. Despite comparative archaeology's agenda to explain change, the conceptual core of these frames was grounded in the building of stepped sequences of transformation with expectations drawn from synchronic empirical snapshots in time. Nevertheless, especially over the last 70 years, archaeology has seen the generation and analysis of unprecedented volumes of data collected along multiple dimensions and a range of spatial scales. Compilation and comparison of these data reveal significant diversity along various dimensions, which have begun to create dissonance with key tenets, assumptions, and even the aims of extant, long-held approaches. Expanded conceptual framing with a shift toward a focus on explaining variation and change is necessary. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Anthropology, Volume 52 is October 2023. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.
... The reasons for the special path of development of so-called city-states and similar societies were time and again discussed in the specialist literature. Only in recent decades were meaningful comparative studies of this phenomenon published (Nichols and Charlton 1997;Hansen 2000;Kowalewski 2019Kowalewski , 2020. In the course of time, the idea of two extreme variants of social evolution morphed into a new theoretical paradigm. ...
Chapter
Full-text available
The relationship between group solidarity and social change is one of the key topics explored by both Ibn Khaldun and Ernest Gellner. However, these two scholars provide two distinct understandings of group solidarity: while for Ibn Khaldun deep social ties are linked to the frugal lifestyle of desert warriors, for Gellner group cohesion is shaped by the ever-changing economic conditions. Furthermore, unlike Ibn Khaldun who identifies war as the primary generator of social change in all historical contexts, Gellner differentiates the foraging, agrarian and industrial social orders and argues that each of these engenders different types of group solidarity. This chapter critically engages with both theorists and argues that the group solidarity has historically been shaped by the three processes that have developed in parallel—the cumulative bureaucratisation of coercion, ideological penetration and the envelopment of micro-solidarity.
... How can we account for this difference in terms of 1 3 varying processes of urbanization versus ruralization, hinterland demographics, and the emergence or absence of specialization in rural settlement? Survey archaeology has long been concerned with the emergence of urban and/ or complex societies, especially in southwest Asia, central America, and south Asia (Kowalewski 2008(Kowalewski , 2020. As such, the relative absence of interest on the part of some Mediterranean survey archaeologists in approaches to these processes elsewhere in the world is unfortunate, especially considering the cross-cultural capacity to enrich comparative studies with large datasets that also involve documentary records. ...
Article
Full-text available
In this paper, we describe the development and state of archaeological surface survey in the Mediterranean. We focus especially on surface survey as a means of documenting long-term settlement patterns at various scales, as an approach to the archaeology of regions, and as a pathway to the interpretation of past landscapes. Over the last decades, the literature on Mediterranean survey has increasingly emphasized a distinct set of practices, viewed both favorably and critically by regional archaeologists in the Mediterranean and elsewhere. We show that Mediterranean survey in fact comprises several discrete regional traditions. In general, these traditions have much to offer to wider dialogs in world archaeology, particularly concerning sampling and research design, the interpretation of surface assemblages, and the integration of complex, multidisciplinary datasets. More specifically, survey investigations of Mediterranean landscapes provide comparative data and potential research strategies of relevance to many issues of global significance, including human ecology, demography, urban–rural dynamics, and various types of polity formation, colonialism, and imperialism.
... This paper sets out the case for promoting the crossing of this great divide, by taking strength from both traditions. The paper will nevertheless concentrate on the current importance of quantification and landscape, and the future potential contribution of science, rather than engaging in either a cultural history, which has already been achieved by Etruscan specialists, or a developed comparative framework, which has taken on a new momentum in recent years (Carballo and Feinman 2016;Drennan, Berrey, and Peterson 2015;Emberling 2015;Fernández-Götz and Krausse 2016;Fletcher 1995;Gyucha 2019;Jennings 2016;Kowalewski 2020;Scott 2017;Smith, A. T. 2003;M. E. Smith 2011;M. ...
Chapter
Over two thousand years ago, Oaxaca, Mexico, was the site of one of the New World's earliest episodes of primary state formation and urbanism, and today it is one of the world's archaeologically best-studied regions. This volume, which thoroughly revises and updates the first edition, provides a highly readable yet comprehensive path to acquaint readers with one of the earliest and best-known examples of Native American state formation and its consequences as seen from the perspectives of urbanism, technology, demography, commerce, households, and religion and ritual. Written by prominent archaeological researchers who have devoted decades to Oaxacan research and to the development of suitable social theory, the book places ancient Oaxaca within the context of the history of ideas that have addressed the causes and consequences of social evolutionary change. It also critically evaluates the potential applicability of more recent thinking about state building grounded in collective action and related theories.
Chapter
Full-text available
This chapter examines Ernest Gellner’s views on pre-industrial agrarian societies and his influence on subsequent discussions. In particular, Gellner divided them into two species, or perhaps poles: local self-governing communities and large empires. This idea became the basis of the debates about multilinear evolution—ancient city-states and oriental empires, heterarchy and hierarchy, or network and corporative strategies. Another alternative in evolution was pastoral nomads, who were different from agrarian societies.KeywordsAgrarian societyAsiatic mode of productionPastoral nomadismHeterarchy
Article
Full-text available
Se presentan los resultados del recorrido de superficie realizado en la comunidad de Santo Domingo Tonaltepec en la Mixteca Alta de Oaxaca, en el que se identificaron y registraron 43 nuevos sitios arqueológicos datados a las fases Ramos (alrededor de los 300 aC hasta los 250 dC), Las Flores (aproximadamente 250-900 dC) y Natividad (aproximadamente 900-1521 dC). Estos nuevos sitios se contextualizan en el ámbito regional al relacionarlos con los sitios urbanos identificados para cada una de estas fases en los valles adyacentes de Coixtlahuaca, Nochixtlán, Tamazulapan y Teposcolula. Basados en estos datos, consideramos que Tonaltepec se encontró relativamente aislado y fuera del control de los sitios urbanos tempranos durante Ramos; que se transformó en un asentamiento fronterizo entre las entidades políticas durante la fase Las Flores; y que aprovechó los beneficios de localizarse sobre la ruta de comunicación entre importantes reinos mixtecos durante Natividad. La localización de Tonaltepec, relativamente lejos de los principales valles, pero a la vez entre ellos, le otorgó ventajas que supo aprovechar a través de la historia de desarrollo político de la región.
Article
Full-text available
The internal control and external sovereignty that define nation‐states today has a long (pre)history. Many archaeologists undertheorize sovereignty by only implicitly inferring the sovereign status of the polities they study. Sovereignty also remains insufficiently operationalized in terms of its material remains, especially for those ancient societies without written accounts. During the final centuries before the Common Era, a network of kingdoms existed along the Pacific coast of Mexico, Guatemala, and El Salvador. Large earthen mounds that formed plazas lined with stelae, elaborately carved in a shared art style, defined each kingdom's capital city. Izapa was the largest of these kingdoms, and recent lidar (light detection and ranging) and pedestrian surveys document the entire territory encompassing dozens of political centers. These data reveal an integrated three‐tiered political hierarchy within the kingdom with the largest centers arranged defensively around the perimeter of Izapa's territory. Further, the “30 km rule” is defined as a cross‐cultural pattern for the spacing of sovereign polities and confirmed based on the location of Izapa and neighboring Pacific coast kingdoms. The record of millennia of hierarchically organized human pluralities generates a more complete, comparative understanding of how sovereignty was established and how it functions. [ sovereignty, territoriality, political organization, Mesoamerica ]
Book
From antiquity until the nineteenth century, there have been two types of state: macro-states, each dotted with a number of cities, and regions broken up into city-states, each consisting of an urban centre and its hinterland. A region settled with interacting city-states constituted a city-state culture and Polis opens with a description of the concepts of city, state, city-state, and city-state culture, and a survey of the 37 city-state cultures so far identified. Mogens Herman Hansen provides a thoroughly accessible introduction to the polis (plural: poleis), or ancient Greek city-state, which represents by far the largest of all city-state cultures. He addresses such topics as the emergence of the polis, its size and population, and its political organization, ranging from famous poleis such as Athens and Sparta through more than 1,000 known examples.
Chapter
This Handbook offers a comprehensive survey of ancient state formation in western Eurasia and North Africa. Eighteen experts introduce readers to a wide variety of systems spanning 4,000 years, from the earliest known states in world history to the Roman Empire and its successors. The book seeks to understand the inner workings of these states by focusing on key issues: political and military power, mechanisms of cooperation, coercion, and exploitation, the impact of ideologies, and the rise and demise of individual polities. This shared emphasis on critical institutions and dynamics invites comparative and cross-cultural perspectives. A detailed introductory review of contemporary approaches to the study of the state puts the historical case studies in context. The book transcends conventional boundaries between ancient Near Eastern and Mediterranean history, and between ancient and early medieval history.
Book
In the ancient Greece of Pericles and Plato, the polis, or city-state, reigned supreme, but by the time of Alexander, nearly half of the poleis of the mainland Greek world had surrendered part of their autonomy to become members of larger political entities called koina. In the first book in fifty years to tackle the rise of these so-called Greek federal states, Emily Mackil draws a complex, fascinating map of how shared religious practices and long-standing economic interactions facilitated political cooperation and the emergence of a new kind of state that structured much of Greek history. Creating a Common Polity seeks both to understand and to explain the formation of states in ancient Greece that incorporated multiple poleis and divided authority among them in ways that are loosely analogous to modern federal states. With a focus on the three best attested examples from mainland Greece—Boiotia, Achaia, and Aitolia—this study considers the development of the formal political institutions of the koinon as a product of repeated interactions between individuals and communities and as a response to a deeply contingent set of pressures and opportunities. Religious interactions created a context of belonging within which multiple poleis could recognize common interests and forge institutions for cooperation, which were, in turn, protected and maintained in part by ritual means. The creation of a common polity significantly increased economic mobility and integration, and koina emerged as effective mechanisms for the management of risk and catastrophe. Despite a few notorious episodes, coercion played very little role in the formation of koina, which are characterized by coordination and careful protection of the terms of the federal bargain. The analysis is contextualized by a detailed historical narrative and supported by a dossier of inscriptions, with Greek text and English translation.
Chapter
The Ancient Greek Economy: Markets, Households and City-States brings together sixteen essays by leading scholars of the ancient Greek economy specialising in history, economics, archaeology and numismatics. Marshalling a wide array of evidence, these essays investigate and analyse the role of market-exchange in the economy of the ancient Greek world, demonstrating the central importance of markets for production and exchange of goods and services during the Classical and Hellenistic periods. Contributors draw on evidence from literary texts and inscriptions, household archaeology, amphora studies and numismatics. Together, the essays provide an original and compelling approach to the issue of explaining economic growth in the ancient Greek world.