ArticlePDF Available

Present and Past Status of Indian Agriculture

Authors:
Present and Past Status of Indian Agriculture
Avinash sharma2*, Monoj Sutradhar1, Sheelawati Monlai2 and Nirupa Kumari3
1Bidhan Chandra Agricultural University, India
2Arunachal University of Studies, India
3Department of Botany, Patna University, India
Submission: July 28, 2018, Published: September 21, 2018
*Corresponding author: Avinash Sharma, Arunachal University of Studies, National Highway 52 Namsai, Arunachal Pradesh, India;
Tel: ; Email:
Agri Res & Tech: Open Access J 17(5): ARTOAJ.MS.ID.556040 (2018) 001
Review Article
Volume 17 Issue 5 - September 2018
DOI: 10.19080/ARTOAJ.2018.17.556040
Agri Res & Tech: Open Access J
Copyright © All rights are reserved by Avinash sharma
Abstract
The background of review has discussed about present positions and past positions of Agriculture. It mentions about area, production,
productivity, soils, farm machine & tools, Gross Domestic Product (GDP), climate, rainfall and water of present and past agriculture. The area and
productivity of 2013-14 are higher than area or production of 2015-16. The food grains production of 2013-14 is 12.96 mt higher than food grains
production of 2015-16. The 173.65mha is degraded soil in out of 328.9mha of geographical areas of India. The soil degradation is reported 53

harvesters to farmers. The farm machine and tools subsidy of 2013-14 is 30% lesser than farm machine and tools of 2015-16. The carbon dioxide

 
The rainfall events with precipitation were more than 100mm between 1950-2000 years. The long-term rainfall is below 10% then the rainfall
scarcity is found in the environment. The long-term rainfall of 2013-14 to 2015-16 is below 10%. The ground water utilization has been increased
after 1950-51 years. The total utilization of groundwater is 50% in India. The annual consumption of ground water is 245 billion cubic meters.
Keywords: Area; Production; Productivity; Soils; Farm machine & tools; Gross domestic product; Climate; Rainfall and Water
Abbreviations: GDP: Gross Domestic Product; KVK: Krishi Vigyana Kendra; ICAR: Indian Council of Agricultural Council; CO2: Carbon Dioxide;
CH42O: Nitrous Oxide; O3: Ozone
Introduction
Figure 1: Percent Area of Crop Production.
Agriculture is a prominent sector of Indian economy.
The agriculture sector of India has occupied almost 47% of
geographical area. Over 70% of rural household depends on
agriculture. The area of production of cereal is 15%, pulses 12%
and fruits or vegetables are below 10% (Figure 1). The agriculture
sector provided 76% employment in 1950-51 and provides 52%
employment in 2012-13 because of lower GDP (Figure 2) [1,2].
In 1960, the growth rate of food grains production was declined
1.40% in 1949-50 or 1964-65 and 2.3% in 1970-71 or 1980-81.
The growth rate of food grains production was regained 2.8% in
002
Agricultural Research & Technology: Open Access Journal
How to cite this article: Avinash s, Monoj S, Sheelawati M, Nirupa K. Present and Past Status of Indian Agriculture. Agri Res & Tech :Open Access J.
2018; 17(4): 556040. DOI: 10.19080/ARTOAJ.2018.17.556040.
1991-92 (Figure 3). The gross crop area of food grains was 75.54%
in 1970-91 and 63.52% in 2007-08 (Figure 4). The growth rate of
food grains production was declined 1.78% between 2000-01 and
2007-08. The 2000-01 and 2007-08 were the critical period to
abatement of food grain production [2]. The growth rate of cereals
production was 1.7% in 1990-99. The growth rate of cereals has
been declined -0.2% in 2000-10 and the growth rate of cereals
production has been declined 0.6% in 1999-2009. The growth rate
of pulse production was 1% in 1990-99. The growth rate of area
has been accounted 3.2% in 2000-10. The growth rate of pulse
has been abated 2.3% in 2000-10. The growth rate of vegetable
production was 4% in 1990-99. The growth rate of area has
been accounted 2.9% in 2000-10. The growth rate of vegetable
production has been increased 3.3% in 2000-10. The growth
rate of fruit production was 5.8% in 1990-99. The growth rate
of area was having been reported 5.3% in 2000-10. The growth
rate of fruit production has been increased 5.7% in 2000-10 [3].
The good production of cereals, pulses, fruits and vegetables is
obtained with application of fertilizers. The average consumption
of fertilizers in India is 128.08 kg/ha (State Indian Agriculture,
2015-16). This fertilizer is utilized into arable land. It improves
the soil texture and soil structure. The total arable land under
fertilizer application is 171kg/ha [4]. Earlier land preparation
is completed with indigenous country plough but this tool is
not prepared light soils. The sophisticated machine and tools
are provided aerated and well quality soils. The total utilization
of farm machine and tools in harvesting or threshing activity is
60%-70% and in irrigation is 37% (Figure 5) [5]. The ground
 
was 25-45% in 1950-51. The net cultivable land of is 143.6mha in
which 42mha is irrigated by ground water and 22mha is irrigated
by canals. The ground water application has been increased for
irrigation in present period.
Figure 2: Employment efciency of India.
Figure 3: Growth rate of Food grains Production.
       
but some of the factors like overconsumption of fertilizers,
overconsumption of pesticides and overexploitation of land are
  
        
abate the activity of organic matter and is increasing soil pH,
alkali soil and hard soil. It abates area of land and types of soil
every year. The increased percentage of atmospheric gases has
disturbed ambient temperature, biogeochemical cycle, climate and
weather. It imbalances plant ecology and ecosystem every year.
How to cite this article: Avinash s, Monoj S, Sheelawati M, Nirupa K. Present and Past Status of Indian Agriculture. Agri Res & Tech :Open Access J.
2018; 17(4): 556040. DOI: 10.19080/ARTOAJ.2018.17.556040.
003
Agricultural Research & Technology: Open Access Journal
The central government and the state government have initiated
several agricultural schemes and projects. With this background,
I am highlighting about present and past performance of Indian
agriculture with following factors i.e.
Figure 4: Gross Crop Area of Food grains.
Figure 5: Total Farm Machine and Tools utilization.
Figure 6: Annual Food Grains Production.
Area, production and productivity
The production is fundamental stages of Indian season. It
         
        
Indian economy. It promotes export and import of agricultural
raw materials. It also participates by private companies and our
004
Agricultural Research & Technology: Open Access Journal
How to cite this article: Avinash s, Monoj S, Sheelawati M, Nirupa K. Present and Past Status of Indian Agriculture. Agri Res & Tech :Open Access J.
2018; 17(4): 556040. DOI: 10.19080/ARTOAJ.2018.17.556040.
diligent or competent Indian farmers that shares revenue to the
nation. The highest cultivation of crop is estimated by the state
level, the national level and the international level every year. The
food grains production and major crops production are declining
each year. The food grains production has been recorded 259.32
million tonnes in 2011-12 and 257.13 in 2012-13. The total food
grains production has been reported 265.04 million tonnes in
2013-14, 252.68 million tonnes in 2014-15, 272 million tonnes in
2015-16 (Figure 6) [5-7].
Figure 7: Area of Production of Crops.
The area of production of rice was 441.36 lakh ha in 2013-14
and 438.56 lakh ha in 2014-15. The area of production of rice was
declined 28 lakh ha in 2014-15. The area of production of wheat
was 304.73 lakh ha in 2013-14 and 309.69 lakh ha in 2014-15. The
area of production of wheat was increased 4.09 lakh ha in 2014-
15. The area of production of coarse cereals was 252.20 lakh ha in
2013-14 and 241.49 lakh ha in 2014-15. The area of production of
coarse cereals was abated 10.71 lakh ha in 2014-15. The area of
production of pulses was 252.13 lakh ha in 2013-14 and 230.98
lakh ha in 2014-15. The area of production of pulses was abated
21.15 lakh ha in 2014-15. The area of production of fruits was
6982 lakh ha in 2013-14 and 6110 lakh ha in 2014-15. The area
of production of fruits was declined 872 lakh ha in 2014-15. The
area of production of vegetables was 9205 lakh ha in 2012-13 and
9542 lakh ha in 2014-15 (Figure 7). The area of production of
vegetables was abated 337 lakh ha in 2014-15 (Figure 8) (Annual
Report 2013-14, and Annual Report 2014-15).
Figure 8: Abatement of Production Area of Crops.
How to cite this article: Avinash s, Monoj S, Sheelawati M, Nirupa K. Present and Past Status of Indian Agriculture. Agri Res & Tech :Open Access J.
2018; 17(4): 556040. DOI: 10.19080/ARTOAJ.2018.17.556040.
005
Agricultural Research & Technology: Open Access Journal
Figure 9: Production of Crops.
The production of rice was 106.65 million tonnes in 2013-14
and 104.80 million tonnes in 2014-15. The production of rice was
declined 1.85 million tonnes in 2014-15. The production of wheat
was 95.85 million tonnes in 2013-14 and 88.94 million tonnes
in 2014-15. The production of wheat was abated 6.91 million
tonnes in 2014-2015. The production of coarse cereals was 43.29
million tonnes in 2013-14 and 41.75 million tonnes in 2014-15.
The production of coarse cereals was declined 1.54 million tonnes
in 2014-15. The production of pulse was 19.25 million tonnes
in 2013-14 and 17.20 million tonnes in 2014-15 (Figure 9). The
production of pulse was declined 2.05 million tonnes in 2014-15.
The production of fruits was 77701 million tonnes in 2012-13
and 88602 million tonnes in 2014-15. The production of fruits
was decreased 8901 million tonnes in 2014-15. The production
of vegetables was 159511 million tonnes in 2012-13 and 169478
million tonnes in 2014-15. The production of vegetable was
decreased 9967 million tonnes in 2014-15 (Figure 10) [6,7].
Figure 10: Decline of Production of Crops.
The productivity of rice was 2416kg/ha in 2013-14 and
2390kg/ha in 2014-15. The productivity of rice was decreased
26kg/ha in 2014-15. The productivity of wheat was 3145kg/ha
in 2013-14 and 2872kg/ha in 2014-15. The productivity of wheat
was decreased 273kg/ha in 2014-15. The productivity of coarse
cereals was 1717kg/ha in 2013-14 and 1729kg/ha in 2014-15.
The productivity of coarse cereals was increased 12kg/ha in 2014-
15. The productivity of pulses was 0.764kg/ha in 2013-14 and
0.744kg/ha in 2014-15. The productivity of pulses was decreased
0.02kg/ha in 2014-2015. The productivity of fruits was 1.130kg/
006
Agricultural Research & Technology: Open Access Journal
How to cite this article: Avinash s, Monoj S, Sheelawati M, Nirupa K. Present and Past Status of Indian Agriculture. Agri Res & Tech :Open Access J.
2018; 17(4): 556040. DOI: 10.19080/ARTOAJ.2018.17.556040.
ha in 2013-14 and 1.417kg/ha in 2014-15. The productivity of
fruits was increased 0.287kg/ha in 2014-15. The productivity of
vegetables was 175.9kg/ha in 2012-13 and 177.6kg/ha in 2014-
15 (Figure 11). The productivity of vegetables was increased
1.7kg/ha in 2014-15 (Figure 12) [6,7].
Figure 11: Productivity of crops.
Figure 12: Decreased Crop Productivity.
The food grains and the major crops area, production and
productivity are decreased due to overexploitation of fertilizer,
improper advent of season or monsoon, overexploitation of
land. The metropolis people are shifting toward countryside for
livelihood and business that transforms agricultural land into
infrastructure land. A man is bearer of agricultural land but his
present generation is not aim into agricultural profession. This
will reduce an experienced and skilled manpower into upcoming
        
schemes and projects. The commercial bank and the cooperative
bank are not passes agriculture loan appropriate manner of Indian
farmers. The extension and the awareness programme of media,
private companies and Krishi Vigyana Kendra (KVK) are less to
crop session.
Soils
Soil is an abiotic ecosystem that provide abode to organisms.

the higher plants are offer security of soil. The human interaction
has disturbed the physical, the chemical and the biological activity
of soil. Deforestation, improper drainage, overgrazing of animals,
excavation of soil to building construction, soil mining prepares
roads, railway tracks, private institution, government institution,
gowdons, industries, factories, multistorage building are devasted
the soil structure, soil texture, physical property and chemical
property of soil. The unrecomended dose of agrochemicals
like fertilizers, pesticide and herbicide has been retarding or
destroying every year physical or chemical action and soil fertility.
This is caused land degradation, soil erosion, saline soil, alkali soil,
sodic soil, hard soil and marshy soil every year.
How to cite this article: Avinash s, Monoj S, Sheelawati M, Nirupa K. Present and Past Status of Indian Agriculture. Agri Res & Tech :Open Access J.
2018; 17(4): 556040. DOI: 10.19080/ARTOAJ.2018.17.556040.
007
Agricultural Research & Technology: Open Access Journal
Figure 13: Area of Degradable Soils.
The geographical area of India is 328.9mha in which
173.65mha are degraded soils [8]. Nellemann et al. [9], reported
that every year 2-5mha new degraded land is added into this
category. This translates into a loss of nearly 10ha good land
per minute to various processes of degradation. The pesticide is
recommended into the soil then 1% pesticide is provide activity
in the soil and the remaining pesticide is persist on the soil every
year that causes various processes of degradation [10]. The
105mha of degraded farm land out of total 142mha net sown area
was recorded in Indian farm house [10]. As per Indian Council of
Agricultural Council (ICAR) area under problem soil increased
from 220 lakh ha (2005) to 243 lakh ha (2010), comprising of
alkali soil 37 lakh ha, saline soil including coastal area account
for 27lakh ha and acid soil 179 lakh ha (Figure 13) [11]. The
ministry of agriculture stated that about 5.3 billion tonnes of soil
degraded annually. All these activities are due to imbalance use of
agrochemicals into soil every year. The imbalance application of
urea has been found more into another fertilizer. This imbalance
application was observed in the state of Punjab, Haryana and
Uttar Pradesh [5]. The imbalance use of fertilizers is due to
lack of awareness about kind of fertilizers; the price of urea is
controlled by the government while Potassium and Phosphorus
fertilizers were decontrolled in 1992; the central government has
allocated more subsidy for fertilizers; the pesticide is monitored
by the ministry of chemical and fertilizers and its application
is administered by the ministry of agriculture. The ministry of
chemical and fertilizers has allocated subsidy; Soil extension
programme like soil management programme, demonstration of
agrochemical application are conducted less at distant villages
and blocks.
Farm machine and tools
Figure 14: Recession of Farm machine and Tools.
Farm machine and tools are primary input of agriculture.
It is applied into both agriculture sessions. It reduces time
consumption, cost of cultivation and progresses production,
productivity of agricultural crops. The West America was
converged with continent in 1801-1900 years. The American
farmers and the stockman were settled into the continent. The
008
Agricultural Research & Technology: Open Access Journal
How to cite this article: Avinash s, Monoj S, Sheelawati M, Nirupa K. Present and Past Status of Indian Agriculture. Agri Res & Tech :Open Access J.
2018; 17(4): 556040. DOI: 10.19080/ARTOAJ.2018.17.556040.
nation was weak and did not establish industry in 1801. The
       
in 1900. The factory had supplied sophisticated machines and
tools of the new agriculture. The Internal Combustion Engine
was invented in 19th century. It developed gas powered tractors
and harvesters. This powerful machine was replaced animals,
ploughmen, knives and scythes. The farmers were adopted farm
machines and tools in the mid 1900 year [12].
The ministry of agriculture had allocated tractors, power tillers,
and combine harvesters to state of Punjab or Haryana under RKVY,
NFSM, NHM and TMOOP in 2013-14. The ministry of agriculture
has been distributed farm machine and tools like rotavator, maize
harvesting combine, paddy happy seeder, DSR drill cum planter,
laser land leveler, seed drill/ zero drill/ spatial zero till drill, DSR
drill cum planter, sub soiler, power operated spray pumps, battery
powered sprayers, tractor operated hydraulic sprayers, hydraulic
plough/ mould board plough, Multicrop thresher, maize sheller,
mechanical cotton pickers, cotton cleaner to state of Punjab,
Haryana and Western Uttar Pradesh under RKVY project They
trained 6773 farmers about farm machine and tools [7]. The
farmers are utilized more tilling tool, spreading of seed fertilizer
tool, harvesting & threshing machine. These facilities will abate

The government had disclosed 25-50% subsidy to farm
machine and tools in 2013-14 and 80% subsidy to farm machine
         
received by large farmers not by marginal and small farmers
due to shortage of mortgage. Most of the village farmers are not
aware about farm machine and tools subsidy. The information
of organized bank and another government institution are drive
less into block or villages. These are impacts on young farmers,
production, productivity and income doubling of farmers in
present agriculture.
Gross domestic product (GDP)
Figure 15: Annual Gross Domestic Product (GDP) of Agriculture.
Agriculture was paramount sector after post-independence.
It forecasted the highest GDP among another sector. When two
continued droughts were incurred in India during 1966. The
Indian farmers had produced 72 million tonnes food grains in
1966. This successful was achieved due to ample water and land
resource for agriculture use. The agriculture GDP was grown 3%
per annum. That’s why the agriculture GDP of India was 28% in
1966 [13] and increases 44% GDP in 1970-71 (Figure 15) [14].
      
vegetables are sub-sector of agriculture that provides contribution
into agriculture GDP. This sub-sector had been provided 78%
share in 1960-61 but it had been declined 70% share in 1990-91.
The shares of cereals 26.6%, pulses 4%, oilseeds 6.7%, fruits &
      
condiment & spices 2.6%, crop sector 72.3% were reported in
1993-94 [14].
The agriculture GDP was reviewed 8.9% in 2007-08 (Figure
15) (Review of Economy, 2007-08). The shares of subsector
cereals 21.7%, Pulses 3%, Oilseeds 5.8%, fruits & vegetables

spices 3.1% and crop sector 69.5% were reported in 2007-08. The
share of agriculture imports and exports were declined in 2009-
10. The growth rate was declined 5.8% from 2007-08 to 0.8% in
2009-10. This period was the critical phase of agriculture that
agriculture and allied sectors contributed 14.9% GDP in 2009-10
[14].
The GDP of agriculture and allied sectors was 13.9% with
constant price in 2013-14 (Figure 15). The growth rate was 4.6%
[6]. The shares of subsector 12.5% livestock, 1.5% forestry, 1.4%
         
oilseeds were contributed in 2013-14 [16]. The current agriculture
GDP is 15.4% with constant prices in 2015-16 (Figure 15) (State
        
livestock produce is above 5% from last year, food grains is
declines 0.5% from last year, oilseeds is abate 4.1% from last year
and fruits & vegetables is increase 0.6% from last year [16]. The
How to cite this article: Avinash s, Monoj S, Sheelawati M, Nirupa K. Present and Past Status of Indian Agriculture. Agri Res & Tech :Open Access J.
2018; 17(4): 556040. DOI: 10.19080/ARTOAJ.2018.17.556040.
009
Agricultural Research & Technology: Open Access Journal
present agriculture GDP is declining due to overconsumption of

coverage, agriculture research and extension are not competent
to farmers welfare, price policies is not favorable to producers,
abatement of agriculture exports, transition of climate & weather,
reduction of employment, industrialization, urbanization,
reduction of activity of media, agriculture department, research
centers, directorates to remote block & villages, non-uniform
distribution of agriculture policy and scheme to distant farmers.
This aspect will impact on future agriculture GDP.
Climate
Climate is paramount physical factor of crop production
and productivity. The mean annual temperature was uniform
variable over the period of 1960-99 years [17]. The mean annual

India [17]. The global temperature was raised during 20th century.
The content level of green house gases like carbon dioxide (CO2),
       
and ozone (O3) had been increased the ambient temperature
of environment. It had reduced a rainfall, crop production, crop
productivity [18-20]. The carbon dioxide concentration was
steady state at 280ppm till the preindustrial period (1850). The
carbon dioxide concentration rate is eluviating 1.5%-1.8% in
atmosphere each year. This carbon dioxide concentration rate
has suddenly increased temperature of atmosphere. This carbon
dioxide concentration is likely to be doubled by the end of 21st
century. It impacts on crop production, productivity, water use,
photosynthesis rate and sugar accumulation [21].
         
India after the end of 2007 year. The mean winter temperature

was hastened in past years. The temperature rate from 1971-
           
temperature was transformed into maximum temperature. The
        

crop production and productivity when crop temperature is more

It is estimated that carbon dioxide level will increase to 397-
416ppm by 2010 year from the present carbon dioxide level of
371ppm and this would further increase by 607-755ppm by
         
area average annual mean warming by 2020 year & 2050 year
respectively. Comparatively, increase in temperature is projected
to be more in Rabi than in Kharif crop growing season. A large
uncertainty is associated with projected Rabi rainfall than Kharif
rainfall in 2050 year [22]. This variation of temperature is effect
on production, productivity of Kharif and Rabi crops in future era.
Rainfall
Rainfall is paramount abiotic factor of crop ecosystem. It
maintains stability of atmosphere and environment physical
factor and provides water or soluble nutrient to agricultural
crops. The rainfall activity is dependent on precipitation. The
rainfall activity was high when rainfall events with precipitation
were higher than 100mm in 1950-2000 years [23]. The long term
rainfall was 10% then the frequency of rainfall was high and long
term rainfall is below 10% then the scarcity of rainfall was found

1974, 1979, 1989, and 1987 years. The normal or excess rainfall
was reported in 1970, 1975, 1978, 1983 and 1988 years. The
  
food grain production [24].
The water availability had been declined during 18th, 19th
and 20th century. This period had been announced drought years
because of scarcity of rainfall. 10 droughts were observed between
1950-1989 years. 5 droughts have been reported in the last 16
years since 2000. The southern or Eastern Maharashtra (Western
India), Andhra Pradesh (Southern coast of India), Northern
Karnataka (South-western India), Odisha (Eastern Coast of India),
Telangana (Southeastern coast of India) and western Rajasthan
are current major drought prone region of India. The frequency of
drought is set to increase between 2020 to 2049 years [25].
The south west monsoon was predicted on June-September
month in 2013-14. The long period rainfall was evaluated 6%
above deviation. The 184 districts received excess rainfall,
264 districts received normal rainfall, 156 districts received
        
The meteorological department has been estimated 1 October
to 31 December 15 south west monsoon in present period. The
long period rainfall was observed 23% lower. The 62 districts
reported excess rainfall, 250 districts reported normal rainfall,

rainfall in 2015-16. The global warming has increased the ambient
temperature of Biosphere. The increased temperature formed
variation in precipitation. The present era of rainfall is declined
from precipitation variation. This is generate instability into
present and future food grains production.
Water
       
production. The earth surface is covered with 3/4th volume of
water. The total volume of water 1385.5 million km3 is available
on earth in which 97.3% saline water, 2.7% fresh water, 75.2%
polar ice, 22.6% ground water, 1.9% soil moisture and 0.3%
lakes or river water (Figure 16) [26]. The water is available in the
Ganga river, Indus river, Yamuna river, Brahmaputra river, parts of
Brahmaputra river, Godavari Krishna deltas, Chambal valley and
southern river etc in India. The Ganga river is the highest water
available among rivers. The canals, rivers, lakes, ponds, canals,
wells, tube wells, ground water tanks, rain water harvesting are
utilized for irrigation to agriculture activities. The world fresh
water of India is 4% out of 80% is used in agriculture. India
receives 4000 billion cubic meters of precipitation every year in
which 48% precipitation is utilized for ground water and surface
bodies.
0010
Agricultural Research & Technology: Open Access Journal
How to cite this article: Avinash s, Monoj S, Sheelawati M, Nirupa K. Present and Past Status of Indian Agriculture. Agri Res & Tech :Open Access J.
2018; 17(4): 556040. DOI: 10.19080/ARTOAJ.2018.17.556040.
Figure 16: Water sources available on the Earth.
Figure 17: Application of canals for irrigation.
Figure 18: Applications of wells and tube wells for irrigation.
The canals, wells, and tube wells application were more than
ground water between 1950-51. The canal irrigated area was
8.3mha which is now 17mha. The canals utilization has come
down from 39.8% in 1950-51 to 26% in 2010-11 and 39.8% in
1950-51 to 23.6% in 2012-13 (Figure 17). The wells and the tube
wells were irrigate 29% area in 1950-51 which is now irrigate 64%


How to cite this article: Avinash s, Monoj S, Sheelawati M, Nirupa K. Present and Past Status of Indian Agriculture. Agri Res & Tech :Open Access J.
2018; 17(4): 556040. DOI: 10.19080/ARTOAJ.2018.17.556040.
0011
Agricultural Research & Technology: Open Access Journal
(Figure 19). The net cultivable land of is 143.6mha in which 42mha
is irrigated by ground water and 22mha is irrigated by canals. So,
the ground water utilization has been increased in present period.
The total ground water is around 433 billion cubic meters and 398
billion cubic meters is net ground water in which 245 billion cubic
meters (62%) is consumed into irrigation, industrial and domestic
activity (Figure 20). 40% ground water is utilized for irrigation
in world and 50% ground water is utilized for irrigation in India
[25]. Uttar Pradesh (80%), Punjab (70% of the area irrigated by
tube wells and wells) and Uttarakhand (67%) are the highest
utilization of ground water for irrigation in India. The central part
of peninsular plateau, Maharashtra (Western India), Kerala coasts,
Rajasthan (Aravali Range), Bihar plain (Eastern India), Manipur,
Mizoram and Tripura are the lowest utilization of ground water
for irrigation due to inappropriate geographical factors. Andaman
& Nicobar Island (Southern India) is 0% irrigation intensity due to
adequate precipitation throughout the year.
Figure 19: Water efciency of Ground water and Canals.
Figure 20: Availability and Consumption of Ground water.
The ground water is depleted because of unsustainable
utilization of water resources for irrigation in present period.
The ground water level of wells is declined 39% for long term.
The 15 states and the two union territories of ground water
level are declined for long term. The districts of south and north
interior Karnataka (Southern India), Rayalseema in Andhra
Pradesh (Southeastern coast of India), Vidarbha & Marathwada
in Maharashtra (Western India), Western Rajasthan, Bundelkhand
region of Uttar Pradesh (Northern India) and Madhya Pradesh
(Central India) are state and region where the ground water level
has been abated to long term. These states and zones are facing
acute water stress. The water table of Latur has gone down by 3.5-
4 meters in 2015-16 and there is no water even 304 meters below
the ground. The depletion of ground water is because of climate
change and it impacts on production, productivity, crop selection,
time of cultivation and irrigation [25].
References
1.           
fruits and vegetables sector in India. J Operations and Supply Chain
Manage 7(2): 154- 167.
2. Trends in Agricultural Production and Productivity: An Inter-State
Comparison. Chapter III. p. 33.
3. (2013) Statistical Yearbook of the Food and Agricultural Organization,
FAOSTAT. Agricultural Development Economics Division. p. 1-77.
0012
Agricultural Research & Technology: Open Access Journal
How to cite this article: Avinash s, Monoj S, Sheelawati M, Nirupa K. Present and Past Status of Indian Agriculture. Agri Res & Tech :Open Access J.
2018; 17(4): 556040. DOI: 10.19080/ARTOAJ.2018.17.556040.
4. (2015) Fertilizer consumption (kilograms per hectare of arable land)
in India. Trading Economics.
5. Tanvi D (2017) State of Agriculture in India. PRS. pp. 1-29.
6. (2013) Annual Report, 2013-14. Department of agriculture and
cooperation, Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers’ Welfare, New Delhi,
India, pp. 1-204.
7. (2015) Annual Report, 2015-16. Department of agriculture,
cooperation & farmers’ welfare. Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers’
Welfare, New Delhi, India, pp. 1-194.
8. Latha MR, Janaki P (2015) Problem soils and their management.
Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, Tamil Nadu
Agricultural University, Coimbatore, India, pp. 1-46.
9. Nellemann C, Corcoran E, Duarte CM, Valdés L, Young C, et al.
(2009) Blue Carbon: A Rapid Response Assessment. United Nations
Environment Programme, GRID-Arendal.
10. Katyal JC, Chaudhari SK, Dwivedi BS, Biswas DR, Rattan RK, et al.
(2006) Soil Health: Concept, Status and Monitoring. Indian Society of
Soil Sci 30: 1-107.
11. (2016) Guidelines for Reclamation of Problem Soils- as sub scheme of
Rashtriya Krishi Vikas Yojana (RKVY), 2016, Ministry of Agriculture &
Farmers, Welfare Department of Agriculture, Cooperation& Farmers
Welfare, Natural Resource Management Division, New Delhi, India, pp.
1-14.
12. John TS (1972) Agricultural Implements and Machines in the Collection
of the National Museum of History and Technology. Smithsonian
Institution Press, City of Washington, USA, pp. 1-68.
13. Abrol IP (2000) Agriculture in India. Centre for Advancement of
Sustainable Agriculture. pp. 1-27.
14. Vijay PS, Dinesh J (2011) High-Value Agriculture in India: Past Trends
and Future Prospects. Research and Publications, India, pp. 1-51.
15. Saleena EC (2017) Performance Appraisal of Indian Agricultural
System with special reference to Agricultural Scenario in the State of
Kerala. J Busi Manage 19(10): 5-11.
16. (2016) Statewise and item-wise estimates of value of output from
agriculture and allied sectors with new base year (2011-2012), Central

India, pp. 1-376.
17. Jayaraman T, Kamal M (2018) Climate Change and Agriculture: Current
and Future Trends, and Implications for India. Centre for Climate
Change and Sustainability Studies, School of Habitat Studies, Tata
Institute of Social Sciences, Mumbai, India, pp. 1-19.
18. Easterling DR, Diaz HF, Douglas AV, Hogg WD, Kunkel KE, et al. (1999)
Long term observation for monitoring extremes in the Americas.
Climatic Change 42: 285-308.
19. (2001) IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change), Climate
     
Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
Change. In: Houghton JT, Ding Y, et al. (Eds.), Cambridge University
Press, Cambridge, UK, p. 881.
20. Mall RK, Lal M, Bhatia VS, Rathore LS, Singh R (2004) Mitigating climate
change impact on Soybean productivity in India: A simulation study.
Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 121(1-2): 113-125.
21. Keeling CD, Whorf TP, Wahlen MM, Van der PJ (1995) Interannual
extreames in the rate of rise of atmosphric carbon dioxide since 1980.
Nature 375: 666-670.
22. Lal M, Nozawa T, Emori S, Harasawa H, Takahashi K, et al. (2001) Future
climate change: Implications for Indian summer monsoon and its
variability. Curr Sci 81(9): 1196-1207.
23. Goswami BN, Venugopal V, Sengupta D, Madhusoodanan MS, Xavier
PK (2006) Increasing Trend of Extreme Rain Events over India in a
Warming Environment. Sci 314(5804): 1442-1445.
24. Mall RK, Ranjeet S, Akhilesh G, Srinivasan G, Rathore LS (2006) Impact
of climate change on Indian agriculture: A review. Climatic Change 78:
445-478.
25. Vibha D (2017) Water and Agriculture in India: Background paper
for the South Asia expert panel during the Global Forum for Food and
Agriculture. Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture. pp. 1-28.
26. Panjab S (2004) Indian Agricultural Development in Changing Scenario
Past, Present and Future. J Ind Soci Agril b Stat pp. 1-13.
Your next submission with Juniper Publishers
will reach you the below assets
Quality Editorial service
Swift Peer Review
Reprints availability
E-prints Service
Manuscript Podcast for convenient understanding
Global attainment for your research
Manuscript accessibility in different formats
( Pdf, E-pub, Full Text, Audio)
Unceasing customer service
Track the below URL for one-step submission
https://juniperpublishers.com/online-submission.php
This work is licensed under Creative
Commons Attribution 4.0 License
DOI: 10.19080/ARTOAJ.2018.17.556040
... The lateral stem branches (Laxminarayan & Chaya, 2014). The ideal climatic factors, soil property and beneficial microorganism encourage gene interaction for constructing and maintaining phenology in the plant (Romano et al., 2020;Avinash et al., 2018). The movement of nutrients in the plant system enhances the biosynthetic pathway and enzymatic activity for constructing vegetative growth in the plant (Getachew, 2020). ...
... Agriculture serves not only money it also provides food for every living being. Agriculture sector of India has occupied around 47% of area from its total area [2]. Countries having more population are in very much need of Cereals, Vegetables and pulses for current and future usage [3]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Development of any country is purely based on its economic growth. The economy growth majorly depends on the development in agriculture sector. Innovative water harvesting and management is one of the main factors involved in the development of agriculture. This work is an attempt to implement efficient water management system for rural area. The system includes air compressor, gate valves and microcontroller based controlling panel boards with communication facilities for monitoring. The designed setup is efficient and provides better results in harvesting more amounts of water (14.23% higher than existing methods), reducing man power and time consumption. Comparison shown that this semi-automated water management is more efficient than the existing method followed for water management.
... Around one fourth of the Earth's surface is under cultivation, most of the land is converted for agriculture in the last 30 years. Many regions including Australia, Europe and recently Brazil and India are becoming really productive in terms of raising yields with the help of organic manures and fertilizers (Sharma, A. et al., 2018). ...
Article
Full-text available
In point of view global warming and pandemic threats, social ecology and balance is inevitable demand of time to ensure sustainable progress and development. In India and Globe, Agriculture and Farming Process is being revolutionized with Technology and it has helped saving plants from many problems. The growing use of technology will not only ensure food safety in African and Arabian continents but also we may extend the researches to quality of nutritious element to plant leaves. In the presented content, this has been achieved by use of ML and Image Processing and to understand their texture and patterns. It will also help to identify any mal-effects of pollution, bacteria or fungus which damages the plant leaves. Different Image Processing steps have been applied to refine the digital data. The manuscript serves as an effort to establish an accurate technical process with help of SVM on various available refined plant data-sets and supports use of technology in this promising field. This may prove as a great help to entire mankind.
Book
Markets in emerging economies are growing rapidly and creating vast opportunities as incomes rise and diets change. The challenge is to better integrate small-scale farmers into markets so that they can make the agricultural sector stronger. Experience shows that when a country’s agricultural sector is not competitive, there is greater reliance on imports and less agriculture-driven poverty reduction in rural areas. Agribusiness small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) are critical to linking smallholder producers to national markets, meeting food demand, and creating tomorrow’s jobs. Agribusiness is the complete value chain in agriculture, from the raw materials and resources necessary to create biological products to distributors and retailers that get products to end consumers. The use of new technology is vital to remain competitive in the global agribusiness sector. Farmers need to reduce crop costs and increase yield per square acre to remain competitive. Agribusiness Management has enormous potential to address key national and global challenges of inclusive growth, and food and nutritional security. With increasing incomes, the demand for value-added agricultural products will also increase, driving the demand for Agribusiness Managers. The increasing integration of world food markets and the expansion of organized retail also imply that the scope of agribusiness is becoming increasingly global. Transforming agricultural commodities into food products typically requires the conversion of large amounts of lower-value materials into more valuable products and transport (of agricultural inputs and food product outputs) over considerable distances. To address this economic challenge, managers need to be able to assess both the cost of production alternatives within a single production facility as well as the total cost�effectiveness of locating several facilities across a region. A similar challenge exists in terms of designing the most effective production and transportation system to provide inputs to farm production operations. Greater operational efficiency results in higher performance levels for agribusiness firms and enhances social welfare through lower food costs and higher-quality food products. The purpose of this book is to highlight these changes in agribusiness which is stimulated by growing interest within the profession and by growing demand from rapidly expanding agribusiness firms. Hence the need to carefully consider contemporary issues in agribusiness arises from the deliberations by academicians who are responsible for shaping future entrepreneurs, managers, and business leaders.
Article
Full-text available
The goal of this work was to perform preliminary surveys over the abiotic factors of Roosevelt river, Amazonas, Brazil in four different periods: rising, flood, lowing, and dry. Four sites were monitored: P1, P2, P3 and P4. There were measured: depth, water transparency, conductivity, pH, surface water temperature and dissolved oxygen. Results showed a seasonality at the four sampling stations. The conductivity always showed high values in the flood at all sampling stations, except for P4. The pH showed low variation in all periods and sampling stations. Only depth and transparency were significant in P2. We conclude that studies are required that indicate the potential causes of conductivity variation: autochthonous or human activities. The explanation of the conductivity source is necessary since the studied area is located near a conservation area.
Chapter
Agriculture sector play the most important role in the developing country like India where more than fifty percentage of its population relay on the agriculture sector (Annual Report 2016-17 Department of Agriculture, Cooperation and Farmers Welfare, Government of India; Mahesh et al. A cloud computing architecture with wireless sensor networks for agricultural applications 2:34–38 (2020) [1–2]). In India agriculture sector faces many challenges that can be overcome to the large extent with the involvement of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) into the Agricultural farm field (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Rome, 2017 Information and Communication Technology (ICT) in Agriculture A Report to the G20 Agricultural Deputies; Ramappa (2008) Information and communication technologies (ICTs) in India: an insight into progress of Rural Economy. Finan Agri–A National J Agri Rural Develop; Shalendra et al. ICT Initiatives in Indian agriculture-an overview. Indian J Agri Econ 66:489-497 (2011) [3–5]). This paper proposed a wireless sensor-based architecture that implement various sensor on the farm field and gather environmental data from agriculture farm field than these data are processed in a central server and passed to the farmer as alert for water needs to crop, protection of crop from animals and fire, diseases detection, crop growth information, weather information.
Chapter
Full-text available
The networking system refers to the technique which allows users to share the information and requires lifetime efficient wireless networking protocols that are energy efficient and provides low latency. The applications of wireless sensor network cover a wide range and provide remote monitoring using networked microsensors. During efficient scrutiny of the network, they suffer for inadequacy information, but it is rarely seen in orthodoxly circuited computing systems. An application-specific algorithmic architecture is comparatively more preferable than the traditional layer formed approach. Low-energy adaptive clustering hierarchy (LEACH) is one the modern protocols for remote sensor networks which can unite the notion of both media access and energy-efficient cluster-based routing protocols to gain the best performance in accordance with system lifetime. For reducing information loss for the data aggregation property of LEACH-B, a simulation that has modified the “LEACH-B” has been proposed to ensure optimization and more robustness.
Chapter
ICT-based learning is a key to modern society to enhance the education system. How information is communicated using technology plays an important role in enhancing the engineering applications. The usage of technical devices in education system is essential for better communication. This paper analyzes the survey conducted on if ICT is helpful in engineering applications, the analysis conducted is based on gender, age and profession. ICT is especially important in present circumstances due to the pandemic we are facing.
Article
Full-text available
The purpose of this paper is to present the status of Supply chain efficiency in Fruits & Vegetables (F&V) sector in India and discusses the need and importance of efficient supply chain in this sector. Authors highlight the inefficiency of Fruits and Vegetables supply chain sector as one of the major business problem in the agriculture sector of India. This study will help decision makers and various stakeholders involved in the supply chain of Fruits and Vegetables like Farmers, Transporters, Local traders, Commission Agents, Cold storage provider to understand the current status, issues & need and importance of efficient supply chain for better planning and management in the field of Fruits and Vegetables sector. Most of the prior literature are focused on the general supply chain of Fruits and Vegetables and ignore the perspective of supply chain efficiency. This review fills this gap in the literature of supply chain management of Fruits and Vegetables sector.
Article
Full-text available
Given the declining share of traditional agricultural commodities in production, consumption and trade, horticulture and other non-traditional high-value agriculture represent an important area of potential income growth in rural areas. The high-value agriculture-led-growth strategy also provides significant scope for achieving greater commercialization of smallholder agriculture. Despite the potential, the contribution of high-value agricultural exports is still small but increasing. This paper examines the past and existing performance and identifies likely challenges and opportunities for high-value-agriculture in the country. [W.P. No. 2011-07-02]. URL:[http://www.iimahd.ernet.in/assets/snippets/workingpaperpdf/21442132562011-07-02.pdf].
Article
Full-text available
The broad climatological features associated with the Asian monsoon circulation, including its mean state and intraseasonal and interannual variability over the Indian subcontinent, as simulated in the CCSR/NIES coupled A-O GCM in its control experiment are presented in this paper. The model reproduces the seasonal cycle as well as basic observed patterns of key climatic parameters, in spite of some limitations in simulation of the monsoon rainfall. While the seasonality in rainfall over the region is well simulated and the simulated area-averaged monsoon rainfall is only marginally higher than the observed rainfall, the peak rainfall is simulated to be about two-thirds of the observed precipitation intensity over central India. . The transient experiments performed with the model following the four SRES 'Marker' emission scenarios, which include revised trends for all the principal anthropogenic forcing agents for the future, suggest an annual mean area-averaged surface warm- ing over the Indian subcontinent to range between 3.5 and 5.5°C over the region during 2080s. During winter, India may experience between 5 and 25% decline in rainfall. The decline in wintertime -rainfall over India is likely to be significant and may lead to droughts during the dry summer months. Only a 10 to 15% increase is projected in area -averaged summer monsoon rainfall over the Indian subcontinent. The date of onset of summer monsoon over India could become more variable in future.
Article
Full-text available
Field experiments with soybean were conducted over a period of 1990–1998 in diverse Indian locations ranging in latitude, longitude, and elevation. These locations provided a wide range of environments for testing and validation of the crop growth (CROPGRO) model considered in this study with observed changes in soils, rainfall and other weather parameters. Model predicted satisfactorily the trends of days to flowering, maturity and grain yields. The deviations of simulated results were within ±15% of the measurements. Validated CROPGRO model has been used to simulate the impact of climate change on soybean production in India. The projected scenarios for the Indian subcontinent as inferred from three state-of-the-art global climate models (GCMs) have been used in the present study. There was a decrease (ranging between about 10 and 20%) in soybean yield in all the three future scenarios when the effect of rise in surface air temperature at the time of the doubling of CO2 concentration was considered. The results obtained on the mitigatory option for reducing the negative impacts of temperature increases indicate that delaying the sowing dates would be favorable for increased soybean yields at all the locations in India. Sowing in the second season would also be able to mitigate the detrimental effects of future increases in surface temperature due to global warming at some locations.
Article
Full-text available
During the recent decade, with the growing recognition of the possibility of climate change and clear evidence of observed changes in climate during 20th century, an increasing emphasis on food security and its regional impacts has come to forefront of the scientific community. In recent times, the crop simulation models have been used extensively to study the impact of climate change on agricultural production and food security. The output provided by the simulation models can be used to make appropriate crop management decisions and to provide farmers and others with alternative options for their farming system. It is expected that in the coming decades with the increased use of computers, the use of simulation models by farmers and professionals as well as policy and decision makers will increase. In India, substantial work has been done in last decade aimed at understanding the nature and magnitude of change in yield of different crops due to projected climate change. This paper presents an overview of the state of the knowledge of possible effect of the climate variability and change on food grain production in India.
Article
Full-text available
Against a backdrop of rising global surface temperature, the stability of the Indian monsoon rainfall over the past century has been a puzzle. By using a daily rainfall data set, we show (i) significant rising trends in the frequency and the magnitude of extreme rain events and (ii) a significant decreasing trend in the frequency of moderate events over central India during the monsoon seasons from 1951 to 2000. The seasonal mean rainfall does not show a significant trend, because the contribution from increasing heavy events is offset by decreasing moderate events. A substantial increase in hazards related to heavy rain is expected over central India in the future.
Article
Agri­cul­ture is vul­ner­a­ble to the cur­rent state of cli­mate vari­abil­ity as well as to pro­jected changes in cli­mate be­cause of an­thro­pogenic global warm­ing. Mod­els of crop pro­duc­tion, con­sid­ered to­gether with global cli­mate mod­els, in­di­cate that global warm­ing will in­crease the ex­po­sure of major crops to tem­per­a­ture stress, lead­ing ul­ti­mately to lower yields. Such de­creases in yields vary sig­nif­i­cantly across the globe (and there re­main sig­nif­i­cant un­cer­tain­ties about their mag­ni­tude). Var­i­ous stud­ies also in­di­cate that cli­mate vari­abil­ity alone has the po­ten­tial to de­crease yields to an ex­tent com­pa­ra­ble to or greater than the de­crease in yields ex­pected due to ris­ing mean tem­per­a­tures. Fol­low­ing a sur­vey of these re­sults at the global level, this paper ex­plores some as­pects of the im­pact of cli­mate vari­abil­ity and pro­jected changes in the mean val­ues of tem­per­a­ture and pre­cip­i­ta­tion at the re­gional level for India. There are sig­nif­i­cant un­cer­tain­ties in pre­dict­ing changes in rain­fall pat­terns for India, par­tic­u­larly be­cause of dif­fi­cul­ties in un­der­stand­ing and pre­dict­ing mon­soon be­hav­iour. More ro­bust re­sults are avail­able re­gard­ing fu­ture rises in tem­per­a­ture ex­pected in the In­dian sub­con­ti­nent. While the de­pen­dence of In­dian agri­cul­ture on rain­fall is well-known, the sig­nif­i­cance of in­creased tem­per­a­ture vari­abil­ity must also now be con­sid­ered. The paper em­pha­sises the im­por­tance of dis­tin­guish­ing be­tween cur­rent cli­mate vari­abil­ity and fu­ture changes in cli­mate with re­spect to the mean and the vari­ance of cli­mate vari­ables, es­pe­cially in un­der­stand­ing the so­cio-eco­nomic im­pact of cli­mate change on In­dian agri­cul­ture. Using vil­lage-level data on agri­cul­tural pro­duc­tion, yield, and in­comes from the Pro­ject on Agrar­ian Re­la­tions in India (PARI), it ar­gues that con­flat­ing cur­rent cli­mate vari­abil­ity and fu­ture cli­mate change ob­scures the fact that in­equal­ity and op­pres­sion are the key to why poor and mar­ginal farm­ers suf­fer the im­pact of cli­mate vari­abil­ity today, even when cli­mate change does not yet have a se­ri­ous neg­a­tive im­pact on In­dian agri­cul­ture. At the same time, un­der­stand­ing the dif­fer­en­ti­ated im­pact of cli­mate vari­abil­ity across so­cio-eco­nomic cat­e­gories of pro­duc­ers, agro-cli­matic zones, and crops in the cur­rent con­text can pro­vide sig­nif­i­cant in­sights into cli­mate adap­ta­tion in a fu­ture of global warm­ing. A just and eq­ui­table pol­icy for deal­ing with the im­pact of cli­mate change on India’s de­vel­op­ment must there­fore pay as much at­ten­tion to cli­mate adap­ta­tion, es­pe­cially with ref­er­ence to agri­cul­tural pro­duc­tion, as it does to cli­mate change mit­i­ga­tion.
Article
Museums must collect and exhibit the tools, implements, and machines which farmers use in their business. These items, however, seldom make up the core of real agricultural activity. The catalog here presented shows something of the range of items that farmers use and that can be preserved and shown. The variety nearly equals the volume. Most museums try to avoid duplication. Even so, few museums manage to collect a continuous series of things showing any one line of development. The discontinuity of farm objects on hand virtually rules out the telling of a coherent and complete history of agriculture. Nevertheless, the museum can show something about the major technological developments in agriculture. The evolution of the plow, the reaper, or the tractor can be suggested even if not fully illustrated. Hitting the highlights has to suffice. The full history of technological change also involves several social and economic conditions. First, changes in implements, tools, and methods results from the accumulation of knowledge. Device builds upon device: first came the wheel, and then, much later, the tractor. Secondly, the potential user of the device must feel a need for it. The new method or device not only must save him work but must clearly increase his well-being. If any device or change merely increases the wealth of someone else (a tax collector or a landlord for example), the farmer seldom will adopt the new technology. Thirdly, since, at first, the new technology almost invariably costs more than the old, the user must have or be able to get the capital to buy and use the newer devices and methods. Of these conditions for technological change, only the cumulative nature of the knowledge can be shown by the objects. Even here, however, missing objects make it possible to present only the most obvious changes, and then not all of them. Still, seeing the things once used—no matter how crude or how few—can sometimes help us understand the way changes took place. Also, this knowledge sometimes can help us guess how other changes will take place.
Article
In this paper we discuss data available from Argentina, Mexico, the United States and Canada that are suitable for the analysis of extreme temperature and precipitation events. We also discuss some of the problems of homogeneity and quality control that can potentially affect the observation of extreme values. It is clear that even in countries like the United States and Canada that have a potentially rich source of climate data there are still problems in obtaining homogeneous data necessary to perform thorough studies of time varying changes in extreme events. These types of problems may be compounded if data are needed from countries that do not have a tradition of maintaining large climate archives or observing networks. We also provide two examples of analyses that can be performed with these types of data: (1) the development of climate extremes indices for Canada, and (2) analyses of freezing events for Florida and the effect on the citrus industry. The Canadian example provides a good basis for countries to take indices developed for one country or region and through minor modifications make the index relevant to their own needs. The analysis of freezing events in Florida is a timely example of how extreme events have both ecological and societal impact.
Article
Observations of atmospheric CO2 concentrations at Mauna Loa, Hawaii, and at the South Pole over the past four decades show an approximate proportionality between the rising atmospheric concentrations and industrial CO2 emissions. This proportionality, which is most apparent during the first 20 years of the records, was disturbed in the 1980s by a disproportionately high rate of rise of atmospheric CO2, followed after 1988 by a pronounced slowing down of the growth rate. To probe the causes of these changes, we examine here the changes expected from the variations in the rates of industrial CO2 emissions over this time, and also from influences of climate such as El Niño events. We use the 13C/12C ratio of atmospheric CO2 to distinguish the effects of interannual variations in biospheric and oceanic sources and sinks of carbon. We propose that the recent disproportionate rise and fall in CO2 growth rate were caused mainly by interannual variations in global air temperature (which altered both the terrestrial biospheric and the oceanic carbon sinks), and possibly also by precipitation. We suggest that the anomalous climate-induced rise in CO2 was partially masked by a slowing down in the growth rate of fossil-fuel combustion, and that the latter then exaggerated the subsequent climate-induced fall.