Access to this full-text is provided by MDPI.
Content available from International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (IJERPH)
This content is subject to copyright.
International Journal of
Environmental Research
and Public Health
Article
Prescription Infant Formulas Are Contaminated
with Aluminium
James Redgrove 1, Isabel Rodriguez 2, Subramanian Mahadevan-Bava 3and
Christopher Exley 2, *
1Life Sciences, Huxley Building, Keele University, Staffordshire ST5 5BG, UK; jamesredgrove11@gmail.com
2The Birchall Centre, Lennard-Jones Laboratories, Keele University, Staffordshire ST5 5BG, UK;
i.rodriguez.nunez-milara@keele.ac.uk
3Russells Hall Hospital, Dudley Group Foundation NHS Trust, Pensnett Road, Dudley DY1 2HQ,
West Midlands, UK; s.mahadevan@nhs.net
*Correspondence: c.exley@keele.ac.uk
Received: 6 February 2019; Accepted: 10 March 2019; Published: 12 March 2019
Abstract:
Historical and recent data demonstrate that off-the-shelf infant formulas are heavily
contaminated with aluminium. The origin of this contamination remains to be elucidated though
may be imported via ingredients, packaging and processing. Specialised infant formulas exist to
address health issues, such as low birth weight, allergy or intolerance and medical conditions, such
as renal insufficiency. The aluminium content of these prescription infant formulas is measured
here for the first time. We obtained 24 prescription infant formulas through a paediatric clinic
and measured their total aluminium content by transversely heated graphite furnace atomic
absorption spectrometry following microwave assisted acid/peroxide digestion. The aluminium
content of ready-to-drink formulas ranged from 49.9 (33.7) to 1956.3 (111.0) µg/L. The most heavily
contaminated products were those designed as nutritional supplements for infants struggling
to gain weight. The aluminium content of powdered formulas ranged from 0.27 (0.04) to 3.27
(0.19)
µ
g/g. The most heavily contaminated products tended to be those addressing allergies and
intolerance. Prescription infant formulas are contaminated with aluminium. Ready-made formulas
available as nutritional supplements to aid infant growth contained some of the highest concentrations
of aluminium in infant formulas measured in our laboratory. However, a number of prescription
infant formulas contained the lowest concentrations of aluminium yet measured in our laboratory.
These higher cost specialist preparations demonstrate that the contamination of infant formulas by
aluminium is not inevitable. They represent what is achievable should manufacturers wish to address
the threat posed to health through infant exposure to aluminium.
Keywords:
aluminium contamination; infant formulas; infant nutirion; aluminium toxicity; human
exposure to aluminium
1. Introduction
It is five years since we last reported the significant contamination of infant formulas by
aluminium [
1
,
2
]. Recent research, though limited in its scope, suggests that off-the-shelf formulas
remain heavily contaminated [
3
]. There exists a wide range of specialised infant formulas that are often
only available through paediatric clinics and prescription. These are designed to address a number
of nutritional issues including low birth weight, perceived intolerances, gastrointestinal disorders,
allergies and renal insufficiency [
4
]. Many of these products are fed to vulnerable infants under the
expected guidance of a paediatrician. Some may be combined with medication [5].
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019,16, 899; doi:10.3390/ijerph16050899 www.mdpi.com/journal/ijerph
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019,16, 899 2 of 7
Human exposure to aluminium is a serious health concern [
6
]. Aluminium exposure in infants
is understandably a burgeoning issue [
7
,
8
]. While infant exposure to aluminium continues to be
documented, its consequences, immediate and in the future, have received only scant attention [
1
,
2
]
and research is required to understand the biological availability of aluminium through formula
feeding. For example, how much aluminium is absorbed across the neonate gut and its subsequent
fate, including excretion.
There is already too much aluminium in infant formulas [
1
,
2
] and herein we have measured its
content in a large number of prescription formulas, products which are fed to vulnerable infants in
their first months of life. Many of these products are heavily contaminated with aluminium.
2. Materials and Methods
We obtained 24 prescription infant formulas through the Paediatric Clinic of Russells Hall
Hospital, Dudley, United Kingdom. Both ready-to-drink and powdered products were supplied
as pristine, unopened samples. They included ready-made drinks for preterm infants and those having
intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR), supplements in the form of ready-made drinks for infants
having poor weight gain, powdered formulas for allergy and intolerance and powdered formulas with
additional amino acids (see Tables 1–5for brand names).
Each unopened product (to avoid potential extraneous contamination) was mixed manually
before being opened and sampled according to needs. The total aluminium content of all formulas
was measured by transversely heated graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry (TH GFAAS)
following acid/peroxide microwave digestion. Analytical methods and quality assurance data are
identical to those used previously in our laboratory [
1
,
2
,
9
] and so are not detailed here. Data are
presented according to product specialisation (Tables 1–4) and by way of comparing ready-made and
powdered formulations (Table 5).
3. Results
3.1. Ready-Made Drinks for Preterm and IUGR Infants
The concentration of aluminium (mean and SD) ranged from 49.9 (33.7) to 249.4 (64.0)
µ
g/L
while the amount of aluminium per serving varied from 3.5 to 45.7
µ
g depending upon serving
volume (Table 1). The %RSD (relative standard deviation) was consistently high across all products
and probably reflects the inhomogeneous nature of the milks and the non-uniform distribution of
aluminium throughout the bulk volume.
Table 1.
Aluminium in ready-to-drink infant formulas designed for preterm and intrauterine growth
restriction (IUGR) infants. Mean and SD are given, n= 5.
Brand [Al] µg/L
Mean (SD)
Al µg/Serving
(Serving Size mL)
Cow & Gate
Nutriprem 1 49.9 (33.7) 3.5 (70 mL)
Cow & Gate
Nutriprem 2 139.3 (143.6) 27.9 (200 mL)
Cow & Gate
Nutriprem Hydrolysed 167.1 (10.6) 15.0 (90 mL)
Danone Nutricia
Infatrini Peptisorb 228.5 (48.3) 45.7 (200 mL)
SMA Pro
First Infant Milk 249.4 (64.0) 17.5 (70 mL)
3.2. Ready-Made Drinks as Supplements for Weight Gain
The concentration of aluminium (mean and SD) ranged from 153.5 (161.3) to 1956.3 (111.0)
µ
g/L
while the amount of aluminium per serving varied from 25.6 to 391.3
µ
g depending upon serving
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019,16, 899 3 of 7
volume (Table 2). Again the %RSD (relative standard deviation) was high across all but one product
and probably demonstrates the uneven distribution of aluminium throughout the bulk volume of
a product.
Table 2.
Aluminium in ready-to-drink infant formulas designed as supplements for infants struggling
to gain weight. Mean and SD are given, n= 5.
Brand [Al] µg/L
Mean (SD)
Al µg/Serving
(Serving Size mL)
Danone Nutricia Fortini
Smoothie 709.6 (180.3) 141.9 (200 mL)
Danone Nutricia Fortini
Multi Fibre 703.4 (53.7) 140.7 (200 mL)
Danone Nutricia Fortini
Compact Multi Fibre Strawberry 568.2 (65.4) 71.0 (125 mL)
Danone Nutricia Fortini
Compact Multi Fibre Neutral 784.5 (121.7) 98.1 (125 mL)
Nutrinovo
ProSource TF Unflavoured 569.2 (18.1) 25.6 (45 mL)
Abbott Nutrition
PediaSure Plus Juice Strawberry 153.5 (161.3) 30.7 (200 mL)
Abbott Nutrition
PediaSure Plus Juice Apple 1956.3 (111.0) 391.3 (200 mL)
NestléHealth Sciences
Resource Fruit 180.2 (62.5) 36.0 (200 mL)
3.3. Powdered Formulas for Allergies and Intolerance
The concentration of aluminium (mean and SD) in the powders ranged from 0.35 (0.03) to 3.27
(0.19)
µ
g/g (Table 3). The amount of aluminium per serving varied from approximately 4–71
µ
g at
birth to 12–92
µ
g at six months of age. Where data were available aluminium per day ranged from
26–231
µ
g at birth to 47–367
µ
g at six months of age. The %RSD (relative standard deviation) for
these products were not especially high which suggested a more even distribution of contaminating
aluminium in powdered products.
Table 3.
Aluminium in powdered formulas designed for infants with allergies and intolerances. Mean
and SD are given, n= 5.
Brand [Al] µg/g
Mean (SD)
Al µg/Serving *
Birth/6 Months
Al µg/Day *
Birth/6 Months
SMA Nutrition
Althera 0.46 (0.14) 6/14 53/69
Abbott Nutrition
Similac Alimentum 1.65 (0.76) 12/38 na/na
Cow & Gate
Pepti Junior 0.53 (0.40) 6/15 35/59
NestléHealth Sciences
Peptamen Junior 1.48 (0.24) 71 (no age spec) na/na
Nutramigen
Pregestimil Lipil 3.27 (0.19) 39/92 231/367
Danone
Aptamil Pepti 1 0.35 (0.03) 4/12 26/47
SMA Nutrition
Lactose Free 1.07 (0.15) 13/35 77/106
* Based upon manufacturer’s instructions.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019,16, 899 4 of 7
3.4. Powdered Formulas with Additional Amino Acids
The concentration of aluminium (mean and SD) in the powders ranged from 0.27 (0.04) to 2.23
(1.23)
µ
g/g (Table 4). The amount of aluminium per serving varied from approximately 4–28
µ
g at
birth to 8–64
µ
g at six months of age. Where data were available aluminium per day ranged from
21–167
µ
g at birth to 24–256
µ
g at six months of age. The %RSD (relative standard deviation) for
these products were not especially high which suggested a more even distribution of contaminating
aluminium in powdered products.
Table 4.
Aluminium in powdered formulas supplemented with additional amino acids. Mean and SD
are given, n= 5.
Brand [Al] µg/g
Mean (SD)
Al µg/Serving *
Birth/6 Months
Al µg/Day *
Birth/6 Months
SMA Nutrition
Alfamino 0.27 (0.04) 4/8 21/24
Danone Nutricia
Neocate LCP 0.29 (0.12) 4/9 24/47
Danone Nutricia
Neocate Junior 0.61 (0.11) 19 (no age spec) na/na
Nutramigen
Puramino 2.23 (1.23) 28/64 167/256
* Based upon manufacturer’s instructions.
4. Discussion
Prescription infant formulas are contaminated with aluminium. Among the ready-made milks
those prescribed as supplements to aid slow growth rate (Table 2) were, with few exceptions,
significantly more contaminated than those for pre-term or IUGR infants (Table 1). The Nutricia
Fortini range of products was consistently high in aluminium with concentrations between 500 and
800
µ
g/L. One apple-flavoured product from Abbott Nutrition was contaminated to a level of 2 mg/L
aluminium. For the powdered formulas, those with additional amino acids (Table 4) contained less
aluminium than those designed for allergies and intolerance (Table 3). The Nutramigen Puramino
product was an exception to this rule, while another Nutramigen product (Pregestimil Lipil) was
also the most contaminated of the allergy formulas. When the aluminium contents of all products as
ready-to-use formulas are compared it is interesting to note that powdered products are generally less
contaminated than ready-to-drink products (Table 5). This distinguishes this group of prescription
formulas from previous off-the-shelf products where the powdered forms were found to contain the
highest contents of aluminium [
2
,
3
]. Intriguingly some of the prescription formulas measured herein
were lower in aluminium content (e.g., 41.4 (6.1) to 67.5 (20.5)
µ
g/L) than any other formula product
measured previously in our laboratory (Table 5). This may be indicative that the contamination of infant
formulas by aluminium is not inevitable. It may suggest that selected ingredients added to premium
products can reduce contamination by aluminium and, apparently, irrespective of the aluminium-based
packaging used in all these products. Since all manufacturers of infant formulas deny the knowing
addition of aluminium to their products, it remains a mystery as to its source. The ingredients
supplied to infant formula manufacturers are likely sources of aluminium contamination. For example,
we recently measured the aluminium content of whey protein hydrolysates (on behalf of a major
manufacturer of such products) and found they contained between 4.1 and 8.1
µ
g/g aluminium.
This represents one ingredient of infant formulas that could be contributing significant amounts of
aluminium to the final product. In the products measured herein and especially the ready-to-drink
supplements (Table 2) it is clear that the inclusion of fruit or fruit flavourings may be importing
aluminium into the final product. Finally, the equipment used in processing of formulas could be a
significant source of contamination and especially if the containers and utensils used in these operations
are aluminium-based.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019,16, 899 5 of 7
Table 5.
The concentration of aluminium in prescription formulas prepared as per the manufacturer’s
instructions. Powdered formulas are identified in the table as bold script. Mean and SD are given,
n= 5.
Brand [Al] µg/L
Mean (SD)
SMA Nutrition
Alfamino 41.4 (6.1)
Danone Nutricia
Neocate LCP 44.4 (18.4)
Cow & Gate
Nutriprem 1 49.9 (33.7)
Danone
Aptamil Pepti 1 52.5 (4.5)
SMA Nutrition
Althera 67.5 (20.5)
Cow & Gate
Pepti Junior 75.9 (57.3)
Danone Nutricia
Neocate Junior 130.1 (23.6)
Cow & Gate
Nutriprem 2 139.3 (143.6)
SMA Nutrition
Lactose Free 153.2 (21.5)
Abbott Nutrition
PediaSure Plus Juice Strawberry 153.5 (161.3)
Cow & Gate
Nutriprem Hydrolysed 167.1 (10.6)
NestléHealth Sciences
Resource Fruit 180.2 (62.5)
Danone Nutricia
Infatrini Peptisorb 228.5 (48.3)
Abbott Nutrition
Similac Alimentum 230.8 (106.3)
SMA Nutrition
Pro First Infant Milk 249.4 (64.0)
NestléHealth Sciences
Peptamen Junior 325.6 (52.8)
Nutramigen
Puramino 334.2 (184.3)
Nutramigen
Pregestimil Lipil 468.2 (27.2)
Danone Nutricia Fortini
Compact Multi Fibre Strawberry 568.2 (65.4)
Nutrinovo
ProSource TF Unflavoured 569.2 (18.1)
Danone Nutricia Fortini
Multi Fibre 703.4 (53.7)
Danone Nutricia Fortini
Smoothie 709.6 (180.3)
Danone Nutricia Fortini
Compact Multi Fibre Neutral 784.5 (121.7)
Abbott Nutrition
PediaSure Plus Juice Apple 1956.3 (111.0)
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019,16, 899 6 of 7
5. Conclusions
Aluminium is toxic in humans [
10
]. There are no acceptable guidelines for human exposure
to aluminium in adults never mind in newborn infants and we have discussed many times the
inadequacies of such published recommendations [
6
]. In the meantime, research continues to highlight
the need to reduce exposure to aluminium in infants [
7
]. We do not know the form of aluminium in
infant formulas and we can only speculate upon how much of this aluminium is absorbed across the
infant gastrointestinal tract [
6
]. Until such much-needed research is available, precautions should be
taken to reduce infant exposure to aluminium through formula feeding. All infant formula products
reported upon herein were, as appropriate, reconstituted using ultrapure water. Formulas prepared
in the home or elsewhere may use potable, as opposed to ultrapure, water in which the content of
aluminium may additionally be high. Where possible, breast milk feeding should be prioritised, as
the aluminium content of breast milk is invariably an order of magnitude lower than in formula
feeds [
7
]. Where infant formulas are the only source of nutrition for many infants in their first weeks
and months of life [
11
], aluminium ingested in formula feeds will be the major contributor to their body
burden of aluminium. The last thing that vulnerable infants fed specialised formulas for their specific
nutritional/medicinal need is additional aluminium in their diet. The encouraging news is that some
of these prescription infant formulas are much less contaminated than their off-the-shelf counterparts
and this highlights what can be achieved in reducing aluminium contamination of formula feeds.
While prescription formulas are invariably more expensive than off-the-shelf products, this should not
preclude future attempts to reduce their contamination and the contamination of infants by aluminium.
Author Contributions:
Conceptualization, C.E.; Data curation, J.R. and I.R.; Formal analysis, J.R. and C.E.;
Investigation, I.R., S.M.-B. and C.E.; Methodology, J.R., I.R. and C.E.; Project administration, S.M.-B.; Resources,
S.M.-B. and C.E.; Supervision, C.E.; Writing—original draft, C.E.; Writing—review & editing, J.R., I.R., S.M.-B. and
C.E.
Funding: The study did not receive any project-specific funding.
Acknowledgments: IR is in receipt of an ACORN/CMSRI PhD studentship.
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
1.
Burrell, S.-A.; Exley, C. There is still too much aluminium in infant formulas. BMC Pediatrics
2010
,10, 63.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
2.
Chuchu, N.; Patel, B.; Sebastian, S.; Exley, C. The aluminium content of infant formulas remains too high.
BMC Pediatrics 2013,13, 162. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
3.
Fernandes, T.A.P.; Brito, J.A.A.; Gonçalves, L.M.L. Analysis of micronutrients and heavy metals in Portuguese
infant milk powders by wavelength dispersive X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (WDXRF). Food Anal. Methods
2015,8, 52–57. [CrossRef]
4.
Korkins, K.G.; Shurley, T. What’s in the bottle? A review of infant formulas. Nutr. Clin. Pract.
2016
,
31, 723–729. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
5.
Taylor, J.M.; Oladitan, L.; Carlson, S.; Hamilton-Reeves, J.M. Renal formulas pretreated with medications
alters the nutrient profile. Pediatr. Nephrol. 2015,30, 1815–1823. [CrossRef]
6. Exley, C. Human exposure to aluminium. Environ. Sci. Process. Impacts 2013,15, 1807–1816. [CrossRef]
7.
Fanni, D.; Ambu, R.; Gerosa, C.; Nemolato, S.; Iacovidou, N.; Van Eyken, P.; Fanos, V.; Zaffanello, M.; Faa, G.
Aluminium exposure and toxicity in neonates: a practical guide to halt aluminium overload in the prenatal
and perinatal periods. World J. Pediatr. 2014,10, 101–107. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
8.
Vandenplas, Y.; Castrellon, P.G.; Rivas, R.; Gutiérrez, C.J.; Garcia, L.D.; Jimenez, J.E.; Anzo, A.; Hegar, B.;
Alarcon, P. Safety of soya-based infant formulas in children. Brit. J. Nutr.
2014
,111, 1340–1360. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
9.
House, E.; Esiri, M.; Forster, G.; Ince, P.G.; Exley, C. Aluminium, iron and copper in human brain tissues
donated to the medical research council’s cognitive function and ageing study. Metallomics
2012
,4, 56–65.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019,16, 899 7 of 7
10. Exley, C. The toxicity of aluminium in humans. Morphologie 2016,100, 51–55. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
11. Crawley, H.; Westland, S. Infant Milks in the UK; The Caroline Walker Trust, 2011; ISBN 978 1 908924 00 1.
©
2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access
article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution
(CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Available via license: CC BY 4.0
Content may be subject to copyright.