ArticlePDF Available

Low Back Pain, a Comprehensive Review: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment

Authors:
  • Perelman School of Medicine and The Wharton School

Abstract and Figures

Purpose of Review Low back pain encompasses three distinct sources: axial lumbosacral, radicular, and referred pain. Annually, the prevalence of low back pain in the general US adult population is 10–30%, and the lifetime prevalence of US adults is as high as 65–80%. Recent Findings Patient history, physical exam, and diagnostic testing are important components to accurate diagnosis and identification of patient pathophysiology. Etiologies of low back pain include myofascial pain, facet joint pain, sacroiliac joint pain, discogenic pain, spinal stenosis, and failed back surgery. In chronic back pain patients, a multidisciplinary, logical approach to treatment is most effective and can include multimodal medical, psychological, physical, and interventional approaches. Summary Low back pain is a difficult condition to effectively treat and continues to affect millions of Americans every year. In the current investigation, we present a comprehensive review of low back pain and discuss associated pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment.
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
University of Massachuses Medical School
eScholarship@UMMS
$-5168$+063)89"86/8)4 $+06636. -,1+15-

Low Back Pain, a Comprehensive Review:
Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment
(poster)
Ivan Urits
Harvard Medical School
Aaron Burshtein
Hofstra-Northwell Health System
Medha Sharma
Harvard Medical School
See next page for additional authors
6336=:019)5,),,1:165)3=6829): 0A79-9+063)89017;4)994-,-,;997
")8:6.:0- 5-9:0-91))5,5)3/-91)6446591)/56919644659 -,1+)3,;+):165
644659 -,1+)3"0>91636/>644659 ;9+;3692-3-:)319-)9-9644659")15 )5)/-4-5:
644659"):0636/1+)365,1:1659$1/59)5,$>47:649644659)5,:0- @-8)7-;:1+9
644659
@194):-81)319*86;/0::6>6;*>-$+063)89017& $:0)9*--5)++-7:-,.6815+3;916515$-5168$+063)89"86/8)4*>)5);:0681?-,),41519:8):68
6.-$+063)89017& $68468-15.684):16573-)9-+65:)+: 19)")34-8;4)994-,-,;
#-7691:68>1:):165
&81:9<)5;890:-15)865$0)84) -,0)%-9:));8-563,"-:-8!80;80;'=)18-'19=)5):0!4)865-9 )82#
$1,8)592> 619-9)5,)>-3)56=)+2")15)6478-0-591<-#-<1-="):0670>91636/>1)/56919)5,%8-):4-5:
769:-8&51<-891:>6. )99)+0;9-A9 -,1+)3$+0663 Senior Scholars Program. ")7-8
0A79-9+063)89017;4)994-,-,;997
Low Back Pain, a Comprehensive Review: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis,
and Treatment (poster)
Authors
<)5&81:9)865;890:-15 -,0)$0)84));8-5%-9:)"-:-863,'=)18-!80;80;!4)8'19=)5):0
)82#65-9 619-9$1,8)592>)5,3)5)>-
Keywords
36=*)+27)15,1)/569197):0670>91636/>:8-):4-5:
Comments
);8-5%-9:)7)8:1+17):-,15:0199:;,>)9)4-,1+)39:;,-5:)97)8:6.:0-$-5168$+063)898-9-)8+0786/8)4):
:0-&51<-891:>6. )99)+0;9-A9 -,1+)3$+0663-8=682=)978-9-5:-,65$-5168$+063)89"86/8)4"69:-8
"8-9-5:):165)>)::0-&51<-891:>6. )99)+0;9-A9 -,1+)3$+0663(68+-9:-8 65 )>
Rights and Permissions
67>81/0:190-3,*>:0-);:0689=1:0)3381/0:98-9-8<-,
@19769:-819)<)13)*3-):-$+063)89017& $ 0A79-9+063)89017;4)994-,-,;997
RESEARCH POSTER PRESENTATION DESIGN © 2015
www.PosterPresentations.com
Low back pain encompasses three distinct sources: axial
lumbosacral, radicular, and referred pain. Annually, the
prevalence of low back pain in the general U.S. adult
population is 10-30%, and the lifetime prevalence
among U.S. adults is as high as 65-80%.
Recent Findings: Patient history, physical exam, and
diagnostic testing are important components to accurate
diagnosis and identification of patient pathophysiology.
Etiologies of low back pain include myofascial pain, facet
joint pain, sacroiliac joint pain, discogenic pain, spinal
stenosis, and failed back surgery. In chronic back pain
patients, a multidisciplinary, logical approach to
treatment is most effective and can include multimodal
medical, psychological, physical, and interventional
approaches.
Summary: Low back pain is a difficult condition to
effectively treat and continues to affect millions of
Americans every year. In the current investigation, we
present a comprehensive review of low back pain and
discuss associated pathophysiology, diagnosis, and
treatment.
Purpose of Review
Low back pain encompasses three distinct sources: axial
lumbosacral, radicular, and referred pain
Axial lumbosacral back pain refers to pain in the
lumbar, or L1-5 vertebral region, and sacral spine, or
S1 to sacrococcygeal junction region.
Radicular leg pain travels into an extremity along a
dermatomal distribution secondary to nerve or dorsal
root ganglion irritation.
Referred pain spreads to a region remote from its
source but along a non-dermatomal trajectory.
Chronicity: acute (<6 weeks), subacute (6-12 weeks),
and chronic (>12 weeks) low back pain
Overview of Low Back Pain
Diagnostic and Therapeutic Approach to the Patient with Low Back Pain Conclusions
Multidisciplinary approach to treatment:
Lower back pain management varies from person to
person, as not all patients respond to the same
treatment approach, and no single intervention is
generally completely effective for all patients.
Consequently, limited trials of one or more
interventions guided by evidence and effectiveness
are utilized to manage the pain, while aiming to
decrease overall costs.
Pertinent courses of care include pharmacological
treatments, psychological treatments, physical and
rehabilitation treatments, complementary and
alternative medicine approaches, and minimally
invasive percutaneous approaches.
References
Atlas SJ, Deyo RA. Evaluating and managing acute
low back pain in the primary care setting. J Gen
Intern Med 2001;16:120131.
Bogduk N. On the definitions and physiology of back
pain, referred pain, and radicular pain. Pain 2009;
147:1719.
Chou R, Qaseem A, Snow V, Casey D, Cross JT,
Shekelle P, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of low back
pain: A joint clinical practice guideline from the
American College of Physicians and the American
Pain Society. Ann Intern Med 2007;147:478.
Hoy D, March L, Brooks P, Blyth F, Woolf A, Bain C, et
al. The global burden of low back pain: estimates
from the Global Burden of Disease 2010 study. Ann
Rheum Dis;2014;73:96874.
Samanta J, Kendall J, Samanta A. 10-minute
consultation: chronic low back pain. BMJ 2003;
326:535.
Acknowledgements
Thank you to the University of Massachusetts Medical School
Senior Scholars Program for the opportunity to research and
present my work.
Ivan Urits, MD1; Aaron Burshtein2; Medha Sharma1; Lauren Testa16; Peter A. Gold, MD2; Vwaire Orhurhu, MD MPH1; Omar Viswanath, MD3; Mark R. Jones, MD1; Moises A. Sidransky, MD4; Alan
D. Kaye, MD PhD5
1 Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02215.
2Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hofstra-Northwell Health System, Great Neck, NY 11021.
3Valley Anesthesiology and Pain Consultants, University of Arizona College of Medicine-Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE
4 UT Health East Texas Physicians, Department of Anesthesiology, Tyler, TX, USA.
5Louisiana State University Health Science Center, Department of Anesthesiology, New Orleans, LA, USA. 70112.
6 University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA. 01604
Low Back Pain, a Comprehensive Review: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment
Patient with low back pain
Perform a history and
physical evaluating:
Duration
Red Flags
Yellow Flags
Are there any serious
conditions suspected?
Perform diagnostic studies
to find cause
Discuss conservative
treatment options:
Pharmacologic
Non Pharmacologic
Assess response to
treatment
Back pain resolved or
improved?
Continue conservative
treatment and follow up in
1 month
Reassess symptoms and
risk factors and re-
evaluate diagnosis.
Consider imaging studies.
Consider alternative
pharmacologic and non-
pharmacologic
interventions
Yes
Yes
... Low Back Pain (LBP) typically refers to the pain symptoms in the area below the lower edge of the ribs on the back, encompassing the lower lumbar spine, lumbosacral region, and buttocks. This pain can manifest in various forms such as localized, diffuse, radiating, or referred pain [1,2]. ...
... Exclusion Criteria: (1) Studies with unclear research types, non-randomized controlled studies, or case studies. (2) Articles that are reviews, systematic evaluations, or secondary analyses. (3) Studies involving patients diagnosed with lumbar disc herniation, spinal canal stenosis, fractures, vertebral dislocations, or spinal cord injuries, as well as those with waist pain caused by infectious diseases, or those who have undergone lumbar spine surgery. ...
Article
Full-text available
Objective To validate the effectiveness of six exercise therapies in treating low back pain using Meta-analysis methods, and to propose optimal exercise duration, frequency, and cycle. Methods Databases such as PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, VIP Data, and SinoMed were searched. The RevMan 5.4 tool was utilized to conduct subgroup analyses on eight moderating variables, including types of exercise, duration, frequency, cycle, sample size, study quality, outcome indicator, and comparisons of different intervention methods with the control group from 42 included studies. Random effects models were employed to test for overall effects, heterogeneity, and bias. Results The overall effect size for six exercise therapies for low back pain was significant (SMD= -1.21, P < 0.00001). Subgroup analyses showed yoga had the largest effect (SMD= -1.97, P = 0.0001). Exercise duration ≤ 30 min (SMD= -1.31, P < 0.0001), frequencies > 4 times/week (SMD= -1.56, P < 0.00001), and cycles ≤ 4 weeks (SMD= -1.61, P < 0.00001) were most effective. Sample sizes of 30~60 cases (SMD= -1.36, P < 0.00001) and studies with moderate bias risk (SMD= -1.37, P < 0.00001) also showed large effects. The Oswestry Disability Index scores demonstrated the most significant effect size (SMD= -3.35, P < 0.00001). The effect size of the physical factors in the control group was the largest (SMD= -1.85, P < 0.00001). Conclusion All six exercise therapies effectively alleviated low back pain, with yoga showing the best results. The optimal exercise intervention protocol involved exercise duration not exceeding 30 min per session, frequency of more than 4 times per week, and cycle not exceeding 4 weeks. Additionally, exercise interventions exhibited the most significant improvements in Oswestry Disability Index scores for low back pain.
... Low back pain (LBP), a prevalent musculoskeletal symptom, encompasses a range of symptoms from nonspecific discomfort and stiffness to severe pain. The pain is typically localized between the lower rib margin and the top of the buttock, sometimes accompanied by sciatica [1][2]. LBP is highly prevalent worldwide, affecting populations across all age groups and socioeconomic backgrounds in both developed and developing nations throughout life [3][4]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background The burden of low back pain (LBP) is increasing rapidly. This study aimed to analyze the temporal trends of the LBP burden in China from 1990 to 2021. Methods Data from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2021 were used to examine the crude and age-standardized rates, along with their uncertainty interval (UI), for incidence, prevalence and disability adjusted life years (DALYs) per 100,000 for LBP, stratified by sex. The joinpoint regression model was applied to calculate the annual percent change (APC) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) for the LBP burden. Additionally, an age-period-cohort analysis was conducted to assess the temporal trends in the LBP burden. Results In 2021, LBP affected 100,093,745 individuals in China. The crude incidence, prevalence and DALYs rates were 3.05% (95% UI: 2.64–3.46%), 7.04% (95% UI: 6.12–7.94%) and 794.08 per 100,000 (95% UI: 557.48–1077.36), respectively. From 1990 to 2021, the age-standardized incidence, prevalence and DALYs rates declined annually by 0.71% (95% CI: 0.67–0.75%), 0.79% (95% CI: 0.75–0.83%), and 0.79% (95% CI: 0.75–0.84%), respectively. The LBP burden was higher in females than in males, with incidence rates rising with age. From the age of 45 onward, women exhibited significantly higher incidence rates than men. Over the past three decades, both period-specific and cohort-specific LBP incidence showed a downward trend. Conclusion LBP remains a substantial public health burden in China, with variations across sex, age, period and cohort. Targeted healthcare policies and resource allocation should be prioritized for high-risk populations, particularly older adults and females.
... These technologies have the potential to revolutionize care delivery, providing personalized interventions and improving patient outcomes. They can contribute to early screening and, more importantly, to interventions delivered remotely, making them accessible to a large portion of the population, thereby making not only diagnosis but also treatment more accessible, promoting a positive prognosis, and more functional pain management, so that a good QoL is safeguarded and preserved [19][20][21]. It is important to establish an effective therapeutic relationship from the start, which helps the patient understand that they are embarking on a different path where they must also be an active participant in their own care [22]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Low back pain (LBP) is the primary factor contributing to years lived with disability. In view of the close correlation between the functions of the body, which cannot be examined piecemeal but as an integrated system, a holistic approach allows for a comprehensive assessment of the patient. The main objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of face-to-face or remote rehabilitation treatment on the psychosocial aspects of patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) examining all possible related dimensions: cognitive function, anxiety and depression, pain perception, treatment adherence, the sexual sphere, family dynamics, social support, dysfunctional communication, quality of life (QoL), while also considering attribution of causes. This prospective, randomized, controlled trial with blinded outcome assessors evaluates the psychosocial functioning of 86 patients with chronic LBP. Participants divided into two groups to compare tele-rehabilitation with face-to-face rehabilitation with a 1:1 randomization based on a web-based system will all undergo neuropsychological, psychological, and associated clinical condition assessment through standardized tests and ad hoc questionnaires at enrollment (T0), after 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), and 6 months (T3). The analysis involves descriptive statistics, ANOVA, and correlation tests to evaluate treatment effects and psychosocial outcomes at multiple time points. We expect this study to provide a comprehensive, in-depth, and integrated understanding of the patient, shedding light on the challenges they may face in managing chronic LBP (CLBP). Repeated administration of the questionnaires will allow us to monitor the patient over time, assess any changes in their health status, and structure an intervention tailored to their needs. By emphasizing these often neglected areas through a comprehensive, multi-step assessment, it will be possible to quantify and analyze how these risk factors can affect patients’ wellbeing and hinder the treatment process and recovery. Registered on Clinicaltrials.gov (ID: NCT06895317).
... In general, pain in this region is a frequent condition in orthopedic care. It is estimated that approximately 80% of the world's population will experience at least one episode of low back pain in their lifetime 9 . Associated factors include: sedentary lifestyle, obesity, genetic factors, female gender, smoking, traumatic injuries, occupational risks, anxiety, and depression 8 . ...
Article
Full-text available
Objective To evaluate low back pain in community health agents (CHA) and its associated factors. Methods Cross-sectional study with a sample of 675 CHA. The presence of low back pain was assessed using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation (JOABPEQ) instrument, with a maximum score of 100, where higher scores indicate less low back pain. Data collection took place between August and October 2018 at the Regional Reference Center for Occupational Health (Cerest) in Montes Claros, Minas Gerais, Brazil. The data analysis consisted of describing the frequency (absolute and relative) and calculating the mean and standard deviation of the numerical variables. Results A total of 675 CHA participated in the study, 565 (83.7%) of whom were female. Scores indicating worse health conditions related to low back pain were found among females [53.98 vs. 66.40 (males)], participants over 40 years old [52.63 vs. 62.52 (≤ 30 years)], married individuals [54.02 vs. 58.88 (single)], those working multiple jobs [50.55 vs. 56.56 (single job)], individuals with permanent employment contracts [46.69 vs. 59.24 (other contracts)], those with more than five years of experience in healthcare [49.06 vs. 62.80 (less than one year)], and those with over five years as CHA [48.42 vs. 64.25 (less than one year)]. Conclusion It was found that CHA with longer tenure in the role and in the healthcare field had scores indicating a negative impact of low back pain, highlighting the risk factors associated with the profession.
Article
РЕЗЮМЕ. Лікування радикулопатії поперекового відділу хребта є складним і багатогранним. Одним із методів є кінезіотерапія, яка сприяє зміцненню м’язового корсета, покращенню стабільності хребта та зменшенню болю. Мета – оцінити вплив кінезіотерапії із застосуванням бігової доріжки з біологічним зворотним зв’язком та розширеними налаштуваннями на больовий синдром, відновлення рухових функцій та рівновагу у пацієнтів з радикулопатією поперекового відділу хребта під час проведення реабілітації. Матеріал і методи. У дослідженні взяв участь 41 пацієнт з діагнозом радикулопатія поперекового відділу хребта, віком від 45 до 55 років (середній вік (47,53±2,22) роки), 29 чоловіків та 12 жінок, тривалість захворювання від 1 до 6 років. Пацієнти, включені в дослідження, проходили амбулаторну реабілітацію протягом 14 днів. Пацієнти були поділені на дві групи за методом «послідовних номерів» із використанням таблиці випадкових чисел, щоб забезпечити об’єктивність та систематизацію результатів. Пацієнти 1 групи (20 осіб) отримували реабілітаційний комплекс із терапевтичних вправ, електростимуляції та тренування на біговій доріжці. Пацієнтам 2 групи (21 особа) в реабілітаційному комплексі реабілітаційну бігову доріжку AXELERO cтандартної комплектації замінили на модель з біологічним зворотним зв’язком та розширеними налаштуваннями Philips 7.0 T. Результати. Отримані результати свідчать про зменшення больового синдрому, функціональних обмежень та покращення статичної та динамічної рівноваги в обох групах. Проте статистично достовірні значення були в 2-й групі, що може свідчити про переваги реабілітаційного комплексу із включенням тренування на біговій доріжці з біологічним зворотним зв’язком і розширеними налаштуваннями. Висновки. Включення бігової доріжки з біологічним зворотним зв’язком та розширеними налаштуваннями у реабілітаційний комплекс для пацієнтів із радикулопатією поперекового відділу хребта сприяє значному зменшенню больового синдрому, покращенню функціонального стану та відновленню рівноваги. Врахування розширених налаштувань у сучасних моделях бігових доріжок, таких як сенсори для моніторингу рухів та програми з біологічним зворотним зв’язком, є ефективним доповненням до кінезіотерапії, що підвищує якість реабілітаційного процесу.
Conference Paper
Full-text available
Abstract: This paper aims to determine the effects of an experimental wellness program package in natural conditions (applied for 14 days) on the transformation of biochemical, functional and morphological indicators, and in connection with the psychosomatic state of inactive women aged 40-50. The research problem is the effect of the wellness program package (yoga, hiking, exercises in water, cascade baths, programmed diet) on the transformation of the psychosomatic state of inactive women. The subject of the research is changes in the psychosomatic status of inactive women under the influence of the wellness program package in natural conditions. The sample of this research consisted of N=30 women, aged between 40 and 50 (distributed into control-K and experimental group-E, 2X15 respondents). We tested variables that primarily show the psychosomatic state of the subjects (biochemical indicators – cortisol, sugar; essential minerals – magnesium, zinc; functional indicators – blood pressure, pulse; morphological indicators – body mass, body height, abdominal circumference). The applied experimental treatment had a positive effect on the psychosomatic status of women. The tested differences of arithmetic means (t-test) between the initial and final measurement of the examined variables of the wellness treatment show a significant statistical difference in favour of the experimental group (E) at the level of significance p<0.05 for all examined variables. By comparing the obtained indicators of psychosomatic status with the reference values, we see that after the treatment the examined indicators move within the limits of the prescribed values. Indicators of psychosomatic status in the subject of the experimental group show positive changes, and the applied wellness program package is an effective tool for reducing stress in inactive women. Keywords: wellness program packages, stress reduction, cortisol, psychosomatic state
Conference Paper
Full-text available
Abstract: Preschool recreational exercise is a systematic and continuous process that monitors and encourages children's growth and development, and at the same time represents the prevention of postural and other changes brought about by the modern way of life in an urban environment. The prevalence of overweight and obesity among children today is increasing in many countries of the world, including ours. Regular implementation of recreational activities from an early age contributes to the prevention of mass non-communicable diseases, which are the leading cause of death and illness in developed countries and countries in transition. The subject of work is the recreational influence on children's physical ability and health. Recreation in preschool is the first step towards physical education that leads to the overall development of the child's personality. The goal of this work is the implementation of ideas and standards that will show the importance of recreation for children of preschool age. The methods used in this work are the methods of showing, demonstrations. Another method that was used is the method of explanation, living words. The third method is the method of children's expression (imitation). The parents were questioned on Fruška Gora in the children's recreational resort "Testera". Data on children's recreational activities before recreational classes were collected at departure, with the help of questionnaires filled out by parents. The conclusion is reached that the importance of recreational activities in preschool age is extremely important. Based on observation, examination, observations and the return of the questionnaire that the parents filled out a couple of weeks after the ten-day recreational classes, the work showed that recreation really has a role in the child's growth.
Article
Background This randomised clinical trial investigated the effect of intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) on pain alleviation in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) and its underlying mechanisms. Methods Forty CLBP patients were randomly assigned to receive either active or sham iTBS combined with core stability exercise. Pain assessments were completed before and after the intervention. Eleven patients from each group underwent resting‐state functional magnetic resonance imaging scans pre‐ and post‐intervention to analyse DLPFC activation and connectivity with other brain regions. Results The active iTBS group had a greater pain reduction than the sham group ( p = 0.05, 95% CI: −0.009 to 1.109). In the active and sham groups, 80% (16/20) and 40% (8/20) reached the minimal clinically important difference, respectively, with a number needed to treat of 2.5. For the Fear‐Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire, there was a significant difference between the two groups ( p = 0.011, r = 0.40). The active iTBS group showed a significantly enhanced functional connectivity between the left DLPFC and the right cerebellum, as well as both occipital gyri (voxel‐level, p < 0.001; cluster‐level familywise error rate, p < 0.01). Spearman's correlation analysis showed a significant negative correlation between Numerical Rating Scale and the FC of the left DLPFC and the right cerebellum (rho = −0.55, p = 0.008), the right (rho = −0.439, p = 0.01), and left occipital gyri (rho = −0.45, p = 0.034). Conclusion iTBS may alleviate pain in CLBP patients by enhancing DLPFC connectivity with the cerebellum and occipital gyrus. Significance This study showed a facilitatory effect of iTBS on alleviating CLBP, which might be modulated by brain functional connectivity. Trial Registration Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR2200064899
Article
Background: Chronic pain remains a major clinical challenge, which is often resistant to conventional treatments. Spinal cord stimulation has been used for decades to manage refractory pain, traditionally relying on open-loop systems with fixed-output stimulation. However, these systems fail to account for physiological variability, leading to inconsistent pain relief. Closed-loop spinal cord stimulation represents a significant advancement by utilizing evoked compound action potentials to continuously modulate stimulation intensity in real-time, ensuring more stable and effective pain management. Methods: A comprehensive literature review was conducted using PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov to identify and synthesize relevant published and ongoing studies with a focus on open-loop spinal cord stimulation for managing lower back pain. Results: Clinical trials, including the Avalon and Evoke studies, have demonstrated that closed-loop spinal cord stimulation provides superior pain relief, functional improvement, and reduced opioid dependence compared to traditional open-loop systems. Patients receiving closed-loop stimulation reported significantly higher rates of sustained pain reduction, improved quality of life, and fewer complications related to overstimulation. Emerging studies suggest its potential for conditions beyond back pain, such as neuropathic pain, cancer-related pain, and Raynaud’s phenomenon. Furthermore, cost-effectiveness analyses indicate that closed-loop spinal cord stimulation is a more economically viable treatment option compared to conventional medical management and open-loop systems. Conclusions: Closed-loop spinal cord stimulation represents a transformative development in neuromodulation, offering personalized and adaptive pain management that is distinct from open-loop spinal cord stimulation. Further research is warranted to explore its long-term durability, broader applications, and integration with emerging technologies in pain management.
Article
Full-text available
Introduction Co-morbid depression has been associated with poor outcomes following spine surgery and worsening of low back pain symptoms leading to failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS). Given the increasing focus of healthcare utilization and value-based care, it is essential to understand the demographic and economic data surrounding co-morbid depression amongst patients with FBSS. Methods Our study investigated the NIS database for FBSS patients who had co-morbid depression (ICD-9 CM codes 300.4, 301.12, 309.0, 309.1, 311; ICD-10 M96.1) between 2011 and 2015 across 44 states. We obtained demographic and economic data such as age, sex, ethnicity, location, number of in-patient procedures, hospital length of stay, cost of hospital stay, and frequency of routine discharge dispositions. The NIS database represents approximately a 20% sample of discharges from hospitals in the United States. These data are weighted to provide national estimates for the total United States population. National administrative databases (NADs) like National Inpatient Sample (NIS) are a common source of data for spine procedures. This database is appealing to investigators because of ease of data access and large patient sample. The NIS database is a de-identified database that consists of a collection of billing and diagnostic codes used by participating hospitals with the goal of quality control, population monitoring, and tracking procedures. The NIS does not require institutional review board (IRB) approval or exempt determination. Results Between 2011 and 2015, a total number of 115,976 patients with FBSS were identified. Of these patients, about 23,425 had co-morbid depression. The rate of co-morbid depression in 2015 was 23% with the lowest reported rate being 20% in 2011. Females and Caucasians had consistently higher rates of co-morbid depression compared to males and other ethnic groups respectively. The average length of stay for patients with co-morbid depression fluctuated between 2011 and 2015, with the highest reported at 4.81 days in 2015. The number of procedures increased steadily from 2011 to 2015 with a dip in 2013. The highest number of procedures was reported as 3.94 in 2015. The mean total hospital charges remained stable over time with the largest change being the decrease from 2011 (mean 93,939;9593,939; 95% CI 80,064–107,815)to2012(mean82,603;95107,815) to 2012 (mean 82,603; 95% CI 75,127–$90,079). Additionally, patients with FBSS and co-morbid depression were more often discharged home than home with healthcare or to another healthcare facility. Conclusions The occurrence of co-morbid depression in hospitalized patients with FBSS increased from 20% in 2011 to 23% in 2015. While direct hospital costs and length of stay remained relatively stable, the number of inpatient procedures performed trended upwards. The exact etiology for this increase in depression prevalence is unknown; additional studies are needed to shed further insight.
Article
Full-text available
Low back pain is one of the most common causes for seeking medical treatment and it is estimated that one in two people will experience low back pain at some point during their lifetimes. Management of low back pain includes pharmacological and non-pharmacological approaches. Non-pharmaceutical treatments include interventions such as acupuncture, spinal manipulation, and psychotherapy. The latter is especially important as patients who suffer from low back pain often have impaired quality of life and also suffer from depression. Depressive symptoms can appear because back pain limits patients’ ability to work and engage in their usual social activities. The aim of this systematic review was to overview the behavioral approaches that can be used in the management of patients with low back pain. Approaches such as electromyography (EMG) biofeedback, cognitive behavioral therapy, and mindfulness-based stress reduction are discussed as non-pharmacological options in the management of low back pain.
Article
Full-text available
To assess the evidence on the validity of sacral lateral branch blocks and the effectiveness of sacral lateral branch thermal radiofrequency neurotomy in managing sacroiliac complex pain. Systematic review with comprehensive analysis of all published data. Six reviewers searched the literature on sacral lateral branch interventions. Each assessed the methodologies of studies found and the quality of the evidence presented. The outcomes assessed were diagnostic validity and effectiveness of treatment for sacroiliac complex pain. The evidence found was appraised in accordance with the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system of evaluating scientific evidence. The searches yielded two primary publications on sacral lateral branch blocks and 15 studies of the effectiveness of sacral lateral branch thermal radiofrequency neurotomy. One study showed multisite, multidepth sacral lateral branch blocks can anesthetize the posterior sacroiliac ligaments. Therapeutic studies show sacral lateral branch thermal radiofrequency neurotomy can relieve sacroiliac complex pain to some extent. The evidence of the validity of these blocks and the effectiveness of this treatment were rated as moderate in accordance with the GRADE system. The literature on sacral lateral branch interventions is sparse. One study demonstrates the face validity of multisite, multidepth sacral lateral branch blocks for diagnosis of posterior sacroiliac complex pain. Some evidence of moderate quality exists on therapeutic procedures, but it is insufficient to determine the indications and effectiveness of sacral lateral branch thermal radiofrequency neurotomy, and more research is required. Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Article
Introduction: Low back pain is associated with a large burden-of-illness. It is responsible for the most years lived with disability as compared with any other medical condition. A comprehensive overview of the evidence on pharmacological treatment options for chronic low back pain is lacking. This review evaluates the evidence for the benefits and risks of currently available pharmacological treatments for chronic low back pain. Areas covered: The authors focus on the recent (Cochrane) systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomized clinical trials covering paracetamol (acetaminophen), NSAIDs, muscle relaxants, antidepressants, anticonvulsants, opioids, and other (new) drugs. Expert opinion: The overall impression of the efficacy of pharmacological treatments for patients with chronic low back pain is rather sobering. The effects on pain reduction and improvement of function are commonly small to moderate and short lasting when compared to placebo. At the same time, the various types of drugs are not without side-effects. This holds especially true for serious side-effects associated with (prolonged) use of strong opioids. Future studies on patients with chronic back pain should aim to identify subgroups of patients with good response to specific pharmacological treatment to facilitate personalized care.
Article
Background: The Flexion ABduction External Rotation (FABER) test is typically used as a provocation special test, but has also been used as a measurement of combined hip range of motion (ROM). It is thought that limited ROM with this measurement may be indicative of hip pathology. To date, normative data, reliability, and minimal detectable change (MDC) of such measurements have not been established. Purpose: To determine normative FABER height, assess inter- and intra-rater reliability and MDC for FABER, and compare traditional FABER measurements to methods which account for differences in thigh length. Study design: Descriptive laboratory reliability study. Methods: Nineteen healthy participants without low back, hip, or knee pain in the preceding three months were recruited. Measurements were performed during two sessions (three to seven days between sessions) by three clinicians. FABER height and thigh length measurements were performed. Thigh length normalized FABER range of motion (ROM) and side-to-side FABER ROM symmetry were calculated. One tester also measured FABER with a digital inclinometer. Inter- and intra-rater reliability were calculated using interclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and mean MDC values were calculated. Results: Mean values for FABER height and normalized FABER ROM were 12.4 ± 2.8 cm and 0.30 ± 0.07, respectively. Inter-rater reliability for FABER and normalized FABER were good (ICC 0.67-0.68) and between session intra-rater reliability were good to excellent (ICC 0.76-0.86). Mean FABER and normalized FABER ROM MDC were 3.7 cm and 0.04, respectively. Mean FABER ROM symmetry was 2.0 ± 0.9 cm with poor inter-rater reliability (ICC 0.20), poor to good intra-rater reliability (ICC 0.38-0.66), and mean MDC of 4.0 cm. FABER measured with a ruler, normalized FABER ROM, and inclinometry all resulted in excellent intra-rater reliability, with the highest ICC being demonstrated for inclinometry (ICC 0.86, 0.86, and 0.91). Conclusions: Overall, FABER measurements were reliable, whether normalized to thigh length or not. Furthermore, use of inclinometry may increase reliability. Reliability was poor to good when assessing symmetry between limbs. Level of evidence: Level 3.
Article
Recommendation 1: Clinicians should conduct a focused history and physical examination to help place patients with low back pain into 1 of 3 broad categories: nonspecific low back pain, back pain potentially associated with radiculopathy or spinal stenosis, or back pain potentially associated with another specific spinal cause. The history should include assessment of psychosocial risk factors, which predict risk for chronic disabling back pain (strong recommendation, moderate-quality evidence). Recommendation 2: Clinicians should not routinely obtain imaging or other diagnostic tests in patients with nonspecific low back pain (strong recommendation, moderate-quality evidence). Recommendation 3: Clinicians should perform diagnostic imaging and testing for patients with low back pain when severe or progressive neurologic deficits are present or when serious underlying conditions are suspected on the basis of history and physical examination (strong recommendation, moderate-quality evidence). Recommendation 4: Clinicians should evaluate patients with persistent low back pain and signs or symptoms of radiculopathy or spinal stenosis with magnetic resonance imaging (preferred) or computed tomography only if they are potential candidates for surgery or epidural steroid injection (for suspected radiculopathy) (strong recommendation, moderate-quality evidence). Recommendation 5: Clinicians should provide patients with evidence-based information on low back pain with regard to their expected course, advise patients to remain active, and provide information about effective self-care options (strong recommendation, moderate-quality evidence). Recommendation 6: For patients with low back pain, clinicians should consider the use of medications with proven benefits in conjunction with back care information and self-care. Clinicians should assess severity of baseline pain and functional deficits, potential benefits, risks, and relative lack of long-term efficacy and safety data before initiating therapy (strong recommendation, moderate-quality evidence). For most patients, first-line medication options are acetaminophen or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Recommendation 7: For patients who do not improve with self-care options, clinicians should consider the addition of nonpharmacologic therapy with proven benefits-for acute low back pain, spinal manipulation; for chronic or subacute low back pain, intensive interdisciplinary rehabilitation, exercise therapy, acupuncture, massage therapy, spinal manipulation, yoga, cognitive-behavioral therapy, or progressive relaxation (weak recommendation, moderate-quality evidence).
Book
In the 3rd Edition of Pain Procedures in Clinical Practice, Dr. Ted Lennard helps you offer the most effective care to your patients by taking you through the various approaches to pain relief used in physiatry today. In this completely updated, procedure-focused volume, you'll find nearly a decade worth of new developments and techniques supplemented by a comprehensive online video collection of how-to procedures at www.expertconsult.com. You'll also find extensive coverage of injection options for every joint, plus discussions of non-injection-based pain relief options such as neuromuscular ultrasound, alternative medicines, and cryotherapy. Offer your patients today's most advanced pain relief with nearly a decade worth of new developments and techniques, masterfully presented by respected physiatrist Ted Lennard, MD. Make informed treatment decisions and provide effective relief with comprehensive discussions of all of the injection options for every joint. Apply the latest non-injection-based treatments for pain relief including neuromuscular ultrasound, alternative medicines, and cryotherapy. See how to get the best results with a comprehensive video collection of how-to procedures at www.expertconsult.com, and access the complete text and images online. Expand your practice and treat patients more effectively using the latest pain procedures in physiatry.
Article
Diagnostic imaging is indicated for patients with low back pain only if they have severe progressive neurologic deficits or signs or symptoms that suggest a serious or specific underlying condition. In other patients, evidence indicates that routine imaging is not associated with clinically meaningful benefits but can lead to harms. Addressing inefficiencies in diagnostic testing could minimize potential harms to patients and have a large effect on use of resources by reducing both direct and downstream costs. In this area, more testing does not equate to better care. Implementing a selective approach to low back imaging, as suggested by the American College of Physicians and American Pain Society guideline on low back pain, would provide better care to patients, improve outcomes, and reduce costs. Ann Intern Med. 2011;154:181-189. www.annals.org For author affiliations, see end of text.
Article
Recommendation 1: Clinicians should conduct a focused history and physical examination to help place patients with low back pain into 1 of 3 broad categories: nonspecific low back pain, back pain potentially associated with radiculopathy or spinal stenosis, or back pain potentially associated with another specific spinal cause. The history should include assessment of psychosocial risk factors, which predict risk for chronic disabling back pain (strong recommendation, moderate-quality evidence). Recommendation 2: Clinicians should not routinely obtain imaging or other diagnostic tests in patients with nonspecific low back pain (strong recommendation, moderate-quality evidence). Recommendation 3: Clinicians should perform diagnostic imaging and testing for patients with low back pain when severe or progressive neurologic deficits are present or when serious underlying conditions are suspected on the basis of history and physical examination (strong recommendation, moderate-quality evidence). Recommendation 4: Clinicians should evaluate patients with persistent low back pain and signs or symptoms of radiculopathy or spinal stenosis with magnetic resonance imaging (preferred) or computed tomography only if they are potential candidates for surgery or epidural steroid injection (for suspected radiculopathy) (strong recommendation, moderate-quality evidence). Recommendation 5: Clinicians should provide patients with evidence-based information on low back pain with regard to their expected course, advise patients to remain active, and provide information about effective self-care options (strong recommendation, moderate-quality evidence). Recommendation 6: For patients with low back pain, clinicians should consider the use of medications with proven benefits in conjunction with back care information and self-care. Clinicians should assess severity of baseline pain and functional deficits, potential benefits, risks, and relative lack of long-term efficacy and safety data before initiating therapy (strong recommendation, moderate-quality evidence). For most patients, first-line medication options are acetaminophen or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Recommendation 7: For patients who do not improve with selfcare options, clinicians should consider the addition of nonpharmacologic therapy with proven benefits—for acute low back pain, spinal manipulation; for chronic or subacute low back pain, intensive interdisciplinary rehabilitation, exercise therapy, acupuncture, massage therapy, spinal manipulation, yoga, cognitive-behavioral therapy, or progressive relaxation (weak recommendation, moderate-quality evidence).