ArticlePDF Available

Abstract and Figures

Solvent residue such as hexane in foodstuff, especially edible oil could be considered as the undesirable substances when exceeds maximum residue limit (MRL). The aim of this study is to determine the hexane content in various brands of edible oils. Totally forty samples (23 brands) of different types of vegetable oils including frying oils (n=14), blended oils (n=13), sunflower oils (n=6), corn oils (n=5) and canola oils (n=2) from Iran´s market were analyzed for hexane content using solid phase microextraction gas chromatography equipped with a flame-ionization detector (SPME)-GC-(FID). The hexane residue was detected in thirty-six out of forty examined samples, ranged from lower than LOD to 42.6 µg/kg. However, in all of them hexane content were below the MRL of 1 mg/kg which set by the European Union.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Freely Available Online
www.openaccesspub.org | JECT CC-license DOI: 10.14302/issn.2641-7669.ject-17-1790 Vol-1 Issue 1 Pg. no.- 27
Evaluation of Hexane Content in Edible Vegetable Oils Consumed in Iran
Mojtaba Yousefi 1,2, Hedayat Hosseini2,*
1Food Safety Research Center (Salt), School of Nutrition and Food Sciences, Semnan University of Medical
Sciences, Semnan, Iran
2Department of Food Science and Technology, Faculty of Nutrition Sciences, Food Science and Technology/National
Nutrition and Food Technology Research Institute, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
Solvent residue such as hexane in foodstuff, especially edible oil could be considered as the undesirable
substances when exceeds maximum residue limit (MRL). The aim of this study is to determine the hexane
content in various brands of edible oils. Totally forty samples (23 brands) of different types of vegetable oils
including frying oils (n=14), blended oils (n=13), sunflower oils (n=6), corn oils (n=5) and canola oils (n=2)
from Iran´s market were analyzed for hexane content using solid phase microextraction gas chromatography
equipped with a flame-ionization detector (SPME)-GC-(FID). The hexane residue was detected in thirty-six out
of forty examined samples, ranged from lower than LOD to 42.6 µg/kg. However, in all of them hexane content
were below the MRL of 1 mg/kg which set by the European Union.
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL TOXICOLOGY
ISSN NO: 2641-7669
Research DOI: 10.14302/issn.2641-7669.ject-17-1790
Corresponding author: Hedayat Hosseini, Address: 46, West Arghavan St., Farahzadi Blvd., Shahrak Qods,
National Nutrition & Food Technology Research Institute, Zip Code: 1981619573, P.O. Box
19395-4741, Tehran, Tel: +9822376426; Fax: +982122360660, Email address: Hedayat@sbmu.ac.ir
Keywords: Edible oils, Hexane, GG, Solvent residue
Running title: Contamination of edible oils with hexane
Received: Sep 23, 2017 Accepted: Oct 20, 2017 Published: Nov 01, 2017
Freely Available Online
www.openaccesspub.org | JECT CC-license DOI: 10.14302/issn.2641-7669.ject-17-1790 Vol-1 Issue 1 Pg. no.- 28
Introduction
Edible oils and fats can be produced either by
solvent or mechanical extraction of oilseeds. Hexane is
one of the most commonly used solvents in the edible
oil industry (1). Commercial hexane consists of some
isomers of six-carbon paraffins, normally
n
-hexane and
it has toxic effects (2). Long or acute exposure to
haxane might cause several human health implications
such as polyneuropathy, muscular weakness, headache,
dizziness, giddiness, slight nausea (3, 4). It has been
reported by OQuinn
et al.
(1997) that hexane may
cause some degeneration of the digestive system of
animals (5). Hexane residue has been found toxic to
humans and animals at relatively low concentrations as
mentioned by Sparks
et al
. (2006) (6). Since refining,
bleaching and deodorization are carried out as
complementary processes before using oil as food
products, it is likely that solvent residue approximately
eliminated (7). However, a trace amount of hexane may
be found in the final product. Therefore, maximum
residual limit (MRL) has been established for hexane
residue by various organizations. The European Union
(EU) Community has set 1 mg/kg of hexane residue in
vegetable oils (8). Several studies estimated hexane
residue in vegetable oil (9), beeswax (10), annatto
extracts (11) using headspace gas chromatography
(GC).
Michulec
et al.
(2004) evaluated the presence
of hexane, benzene and toluene in the vegetable oils,
cardamom and vitamin A using HS- GC-FID (12). Ligor
and Buszewski (2008) developed SHS-GC-FID and SPME
-GC-FID methods to investigate the presence of
solvents such as acetone, n-hexane, benzene, and
toluene in various edible oils and they found that these
methods could be successfully applied in the usual
analysis of residue solvents in vegetable oils (13).
Based on our knowledge, there is not a
comprehensive study in order to evaluate the
concentration of hexane residues in consumed edible
oils in Iran. Therefore, the aim of this study was to
assess the hexane residues in 40 collected edible oil
samples from of Iran market.
Materials and Method
Chemical Materials
Milli-Q apparatus was utilized to supply
deionized water (Billerica, MA, USA).The SPME
apparatus with Carboxen (CAR)/PDMS–thickness 75 lm)
coating fibers was supplied from Supelco(Bellefonte, PA,
USA). The precondition of SPME fibers was done at
200°C for 10 min.
Analytical grade of hexane and chemical
materials were supplied from Merck (Darmstadt,
Germany).
Samples Collection and Preparation
In total, 40 oil samples (consisting of sunflower
(n=6), corn (n=5), canola (n=2), frying (n=14) and
blended oils (n=13)) of 24 brands were collected from
Iranian market (Tehran, summer 2014). All the samples
were stored at the dark room (25°C), in their original
packages (Polyethylene terephthalate (PET)). The
analysis all were performed in triplicate.
Hexane Measurement
The solid phase microextraction Agilent
Technologies 7890A GC system (SPME)-GC-(FID) (Palo
Alto, CA, USA) which was coupled to a flame-ionization
detector (FID)were used to determine residual hexane
according to the Ligor and Buszewski (2008), Briefly, 50
mL of oil samples were placed in the HS vials (120 mL).
Isolation step was carried out at 40 ± 1°C for 30 min
without stirring. After that desorption was done for 5
min by the fiber in the injection port in where the
temperature was adjusted 200°C (injector position
splitless). Then the oven temperature program was
started (position–split). Separation was performed using
The Stabilwax (Restek) column (30 m× 0.25 mm × 0.25
µm). The oven temperature program consisted of 3 min
isothermal period at 40°C, then raised at 4°C/min
increase to 100°C (held for 0 min), followed by
increasing the temperature by 15°C/min to 190°C/min
(held 4 min). Helium (99.999% purity) was utilized as a
carrier gas with a pressure of 100 kPa. The temperature
of split splitless injector and the FID detector were
adjusted 200°C (13).
Result and Discussion
Hexane Concentration
Hexane is one of the most commonly used
solvents not only in the edible oil industry but also in
the process of herbal medicine and bioactive
Freely Available Online
www.openaccesspub.org | JECT CC-license DOI: 10.14302/issn.2641-7669.ject-17-1790 Vol-1 Issue 1 Pg. no.- 29
components production (14, 15). So, hexane may be
present in trace amounts in these kinds of products. A
study has previously shown that 2,5-hexanedione which
is derived from the metabolism of hexane is neurotoxic
(16). Therefore, various maximum residual limit (MRL)
has been determined for residual solvent in these
products in order to reduce or eliminate chronic toxic
effects of the solvents. So, in this study the hexane
residue in 40 collected edible oil samples from of Iran
market was evaluated. The limit of detection (LOD) and
the limit of quantification (LOQ) were 3 µg/kg and 5µg/
kg, respectively. The high correlation coefficients (0.981)
indicated that there is a good linear behavior in the
tested range (5-100 µg/kg). In this study, analysis of 40
oil samples described that 36 of them had hexane
residue and its concentration ranged from < LOD to
42.6 µ/kg (Table 1). The results showed that 35% of the
samples had hexane residue ranging from 5-42.6 µg/kg,
while 10% of the samples were free of hexane and any
hexane residue was detected in these 4 samples. The
55% of remaining samples had hexane residue, but it
value was lower that LOQ.and LOD. As can be seen in
Table 1 the highest hexane content as observed in
canola oil. Based on the maximum residue limit of 1 mg/
kg of hexane in the vegetable oils which is set by the
European Union, none of the analyzed samples exceed
the limit (8). There are only a few studies about the
hexane residue in vegetable oils. Commercial orujo oil
samples with various percentages of virgin olive oil
(510%) were analyzed by Peña
et al.
(2003) for the
presence of residual hexane and the results showed that
almost all the samples were negative in term of hexane
residue (lower than LOD) and just two samples had
hexane at concentration of 2 and 3 mg/kg (3). The
presence of solvent residue, including hexane, benzene,
and toluene has been investigated by Michulec
et al.
(2004) in the different brands of primrose oil using HS-
GC-FID. The value of 0.004, 0.009 and 0.017 mg/kg
were achieved as limits of detection (LOD) for hexane,
benzene, and toluene, respectively. They found that in
all the primrose oils, the content of benzene was lower
than LOD. Hexane residue in the most of the samples
was lower than LOD, and only three samples had the
value of 0.13, 0.16 and 0.70 mg/kg for hexane content
(12). Similarly, the content of toluene was lower than
LOD in the most oil samples. Oh
et al.
(2005) found that
hexane residue varied from trace amounts to 2.8 mg/kg
in 87 commercial vegetable oils (9). Additionally, Ito
et
al
. (2012) evaluated 23 annatto extract products for
hexane residue by applying HS-GC/FID, and nearly 91%
of the samples were free of hexane and only two
samples containing hexane in the value of 0.6 and 0.7
mg/kg (11). Ligor and Buszewski (2008) investigated the
presence of some solvents including acetone, n-hexane,
benzene, and toluene in various edible oils using SPME-
GC-FID and SHS-GC-FID methods. A value of 0.003 and
0.002 mg/kg were obtained for a limit of detection by
SPME-GC-FID and SHS-GC-FID methods, respectively.
Their results showed that the residual amount of hexane
in various vegetable oils was between 0.005 –0.460 mg/
kg, which was below the permitted value of Polish norm
(1000 mg/kg) (13). Jeong et al. (2017) developed HS-
GC/MS method to evaluate hexane residue in health
functional food products. They claimed that by applying
this approach, it is likely to determine hexane residue in
various kinds of these commodities. Their results
showed that the average content of hexane in γ-
Linolenic acid, omega-3 fatty acid, and conjugated
linoleic acid was 0.39, 0.45 and 0.74 mg/kg,
respectively. Furthermore, they achieved the value of
0.56 and 0.76 mg/kg as the mean content of hexane
residue in lecithin and phosphatidylserine, respectively
(14). Based on our study and similar research that
evaluated the presence of hexane in the vegetable oils,
bixin-based products, and some commercial functional
food products, it seems that there is no concern about
hexane residue in these commodities.
Conclusion
Hexane is the solvent that is widely utilized in
the process of herbal medicine and bioactive
components production and oil industry. However, it
may not be completely removed and hexane residue,
especially more that standard limit is undesirable. In this
study the content of hexane in forty samples (23
brands) of different type of vegetable oil including
frying, blended, sunflower, corn, and canola oils were
investigated. Although, hexane residue was determined
was detected in thirty-six out of forty examined samples,
hexane content was below the MRL of 1 mg/kg which
set by the EU in all of oil samples.
Conflict of Interest
Freely Available Online
www.openaccesspub.org | JECT CC-license DOI: 10.14302/issn.2641-7669.ject-17-1790 Vol-1 Issue 1 Pg. no.- 30
Table 1. Content of hexane residue in different brands of vegetable oil
Type of edible oil Hexane residue (µg/kg) Type of edible oil Hexane residue (µg/kg) Type of edible oil Hexane residue (µg/kg)
Frying oil
(Brand)
Blended oil
(Brand)
Sunflower oil (Brand)
1 (A) <LOD 1 (A) <LOD 1 (A) 5±0.2
2 (B) ND 2 (B) <LOD 2 (B) <LOD
3 (C) <LOQ 3 (C) 4.8±0.15 3 (C) ND
4 (D) 9±1.44 4 (D) <LOQ 4 (I) <LOD
5 (E) 5±0.45 5 (E) 10.4±0.32 5 (J) <LOD
6 (F) <LOQ 6 (F) <LOD Corn oil (Brand)
7 (G) <LOD 7 (G) <LOQ 1 (A) 5.5±0.15
8 (H) 5.5±0.2 8 (H) <LOQ 2 (B) <LOQ
9 (I) 4.6±0.15 9 (J) <LOD 3 (P) LOD
10 (K) 4.8±0.45 10 (N) <LOQ 4 (Q) 5.7±0.15
11 (L) ND 11 (O) ND 5 (R) 18.3±0.25
12 (M) <LOD 12 (T) <LOD 6 (S) 6.9±0.2
13 (U) 5.4±0.15 13 (W) <LOD Canola oil (Brand)
14 (V) <LOQ 1 (A) 42.6±0.2
2 (B) <LOD
The authors declare there are no conflicts of
interest.
References
1. Mirghani, M.E.S.and Che Man, Y.B. (2003) JAOCS.
80(7), 619-23.
2. Wan, P.J., and R.J. Horn. ( 1998) INFORM. 9, 7079.
3. Peña, F., Cárdenas, S., Gallego, M.and Valcárcel, M.
(2003) JAOCS. 80(6), 613-8.
4. Galvin, J.B. (1997) Toxicity Data for Commercial
Hexane and Hexane Isomers, in Technology and
Solvents for Extracting Oilseeds and Nonpetroleum
Oils, AOCS Press, Champaign. pp. 7585.
5. O'Quinn, P.R., Knabe, D.A., Gregg, E.J.and Lusas,
E.W. (1997) J. Anim. Sci. 75(3), 714-719.
6. Sparks, D., Hernandez, R., Zappi, M., Blackwell, D.
and Fleming, T. (2006) JAOCS. 83 (10), 885-891.
7. Wakelyn, P.J.and Wan, P.J. (2004) INFORM. 15(1),
22-3.
8. Directive, E. U. (2009) Official J Eur Commun 141,
5-11.
9. Oh, C.-H., Kwon, Y.-K., Jang, Y.-M., Lee, D.-S.and
Park, J.-S. (2005) Food Sci. Biotechnol. 14, 456-460.
10. Antolín, E.M., Quiñónez, Y.B., Canavaciolo, V.G.and
Cruz, E.R. (2008) J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 47(3), 646
-50.
11. Ito, Y., Ishizuki, K., Sekiguchi, W., Tada, A.,
Akiyama, T., et al. (2012) AJCAC .3(09), 638.
12. Michulec, M.and Wardencki, W. (2004)
Chromatographia.60, 273-277.
13. Ligor, M.and Buszewski, B. (2008) J. Sep Sci. 31(2),
364-371.
14. Jeong, E.-J., Lee, S.H., Kim, B.-T., Lee, G., Yun, S.S.,
et al. (2017) Food Sci. Biotechnol. 26(2), 363-368.
15. Garg, M., Solanki, J., Mehta, M.and Satija, S. (2012)
IREBIC. 3(4), 74-78.
16. Buddrick, O., Jones, O.A., Morrison, P.D.and Small,
D.M. (2013) RSC Advances. 3(46), 24063-24068.
... Maximum residual level (MRL) of hexane has been established by various organisations and countries. European Union (EU) regulates the limit of hexane residues at 1 ppm (maximum) (Yousefi and Hosseini, 2017), while in Korea, the maximum level is 5 ppm (Oh et al., 2005). Static headspace analyses using GC-FID and gas chromatography mass spectrometric detector (GC-MSD) were developed to detect residual hexane in food and edible oil products (Oh et al., 2005;Jeong et al., 2017;Yousefi and Hosseini, 2017;Othman et al., 2019). ...
... European Union (EU) regulates the limit of hexane residues at 1 ppm (maximum) (Yousefi and Hosseini, 2017), while in Korea, the maximum level is 5 ppm (Oh et al., 2005). Static headspace analyses using GC-FID and gas chromatography mass spectrometric detector (GC-MSD) were developed to detect residual hexane in food and edible oil products (Oh et al., 2005;Jeong et al., 2017;Yousefi and Hosseini, 2017;Othman et al., 2019). Table 1 shows the residual hexane concentrations in PPFO collected from eight solvent extraction plants in Malaysia. ...
... Typically, rotary evaporator and oven are used to eliminate the n-hexane from palm kernel oil. The analytical methods such as Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) [6] and gas chromatography (GC) [7] are used to measure the concentration of n-hexane. The mentioned methods are complicated, and they depend on chemical knowledge, nonlinear calibration carves, and high cost instrument. ...
... PPy-NPs/RGO. So, the SPR signals were separately registered for each n-hexane solution, and the SPR signals were analyzed using Fresnel's equations (1), (3), and (5)- (7). The experiment was repeated 10 times to obtain the variation of resonance angle shift with time. ...
Article
Full-text available
Palm kernel oil was extracted using n-hexane. Rotary evaporator and oven were used to remove n-hexane from the oil. Measurement of n-hexane in low concentration is significant and interest subject. In this study, the concentration of n-hexane was measured using the surface plasmon resonance technique. In order to improve the sensitivity of surface plasmon resonance sensor, the polypyrrole nanoparticles decorated reduced graphene oxide (sensing layer) was prepared using the electrodeposition technique on the surface of gold film. Different concentration of n-hexane in isooctane and the palm kernel oil before and after purification was tested using sensing layer. The sensor limit was about 1 ppm. The results were matched with the gas chromatography results. The thickness and roughness of sensing layer were increased after the interaction with n-hexane which was obtained from atomic force microscopy.
... Ladkrabang, Bangkok, 10520, Thailand;supatra.ka@kmitl.ac.th Although alternative lipid extraction methods have been used (Talbot, 2011), hexane defatting is still common, which has been shown to remove more than 96% oil on average (Ricochon and Muniglia, 2010;Yousefi and Hosseini, 2017). Nevertheless, no information is available on the impact of hexane defatting on the characteristics of Bombay locust powder and its potential contribution to alleviate future food challenges as an alternative protein source. ...
Article
Impact of hexane defatting on physicochemical, oxidative stability and total volatile compounds of Bombay locust (Patanga succincta L.) powder ‘BL’ were studied. Defatted insect powder (F/BL) showed marked decrease in fat content (1.2%) with significantly (P≤0.05) higher protein content (78.7%), compared with those of BL (29.8% fat and 56.5% protein). Based on electrophoresis result, hexane defatting had no effect on peptide distribution of insect powders. F/BL had lower peroxide value with better oxidative stability (P≤0.05), while less variety of volatiles with more off-flavour compounds, particularly lipid oxidation and insect hormone odours, were observed from BL. F/BL was confirmed as an excellent source of amino acids and minerals. The physicochemical and sensory properties of F/BL fortified biscuit stick and the final products were determined. F/BL fortified biscuit stick showed a better acceptance, compared with those from BL at the same level used. Based on sensory characteristics, biscuit stick with 10% F/BL (F/BL-10) was selected and studied for its chemical composition and microstructure. F/BL-10 possessed more porous structure with higher protein and lower energy value, compared with those from 10% BL. Overall, defatted Bombay locusts could be an effective alternative protein source with excellent applicability to baked products, particularly biscuit stick.
Article
Full-text available
Oilseeds extraction of oils requires the use of a processing aid : a solvent. This seventh article on the comparison of solvents potentially capable of replacing hexane presents a multi-criteria analysis, systematically revisiting aspects from previous investigations. The methodology addresses the problem’s complexity by aggregating different dimensions representative of each criterion, resulting in a nuanced ranking approach. The comprehensive study examined critical dimensions including solvent extractive efficacy, operational safety, explosion risk, toxicity to workers, environmental impact, process modifications, energy consumption, effects on products quality, residual toxicity, technology readiness level, and economic feasibility. From a technical standpoint, hexane today remains the most efficient solvent for oilseed crushers. Dichloromethane may be a viable alternative due to its non-explosive nature, though its toxicity concerns are significant. 2-methyloxolane is the subject of ongoing research and development investments, which may ultimately establish it as a credible alternative solution. Different stakeholders present varied perspectives on solvent replacement. For worker safety, isopropanol and ethanol are preferable options. Environmental advocates may favor ethyl acetate because of its lower energy requirements during processing. Regarding food safety, both ethanol and ethyl acetate are generally regarded as acceptable solvents. Public authorities, for their part, must balance what is desirable with what is feasible, in a multi-criteria framework of balancing safety, toxicity, environmental impact, availability, and cost on a global scale.
Article
This study investigated the lipid profiles and free radical scavenging potential of Coriandrum sativum fruit oils from Tunisia and Canada, utilizing three extraction methods: single screw, twin screw, and solvent extraction. Significant differences (p < 0.05) were found in the concentrations of essential fatty acids, including petroselinic, linoleic, oleic, and palmitic acids, between oils from the two regions. Notably, the twin screw extraction method applied to Tunisian coriander oils resulted in higher phytochemical content and superior free radical scavenging activity. The twin screw method demonstrated the highest efficacy, achieving an IC50 value of 1.4 mg/ml for the stable DPPH radical, while the solvent extraction method yielded an IC50 of 4 mg/ml for the same oil. These findings highlight the influence of geographic origin and extraction techniques on the nutritional and antioxidant properties of coriander oils.
Article
Full-text available
This study investigates the performance of cyclopentyl methyl ether (CPME) in the extraction of fenugreek seed oil, aiming to replace the conventionally used hexane. The efficiency of this alternative solvent was evaluated first through in silico methods (based on Hansen Solubility Parameters (HSPs) and Conductor-like Screening Model for Real Solvent (COSMO-RS) simulations), followed by experimental studies. Solubility computational predictions analysis revealed that CPME exhibits superior solvation power compared to hexane. Experimentally, CPME demonstrated a significantly higher oil yield (7.23%) compared to hexane (4.25%) and a better retention of beneficial unsaturated fatty acids than hexane. Additionally, the physicochemical properties of oils extracted with CPME showed enhanced oxidative stability, sterol, tocopherol, and phenolic contents, leading to superior antioxidant and antibacterial activities. Importantly, CPME’s low volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions further establish it as a more sustainable and environmentally friendly alternative to hexane, aligning with contemporary goals of reducing harmful emissions in extraction processes. Thus, this paper highlights the functional advantages of CPME, focusing on its efficiency, selectivity, and enhanced retention of bioactive compounds, positioning it as a superior extraction solvent for fenugreek seed oil compared to hexane.
Article
Edible oils are inevitable requisites in the human diet as they are enriched with essential fatty acids, vitamins, carotenoids, sterols, and other antioxidants. Due to their nutritive value and commercial significance, edible oils have been used for food preparation for many centuries. The use of global consumption of edible oils has dramatically increased throughout the world in the 21st century owing to their incredible application in all kinds of food preparation. However, a variety of pollutants, such as pesticides, toxic chemicals, heavy metals, and environmental pollution, have contributed to the contamination of edible oils. Furthermore, the benzophenanthridine alkaloids, sanguinarine, dihydrosanguinarine, butter yellow, and other several agents are added intentionally, which are known to cause a number of human diseases. Apart from this, repeated heating and reusing of oils results in trans fats, and lipid peroxidation alters the fatty acid composition, which adversely affects the health of consumers and increases the risk of cardiovascular diseases. Moreover, the prevention of edible oil contamination in human health at various levels is inevitable to ensure consumer safety. Hence, the present review provides an overview of vegetable cooking oils and the health ailments that detection techniques are focused on.
Article
Full-text available
Hexane is a solvent used extensively in the food industry for the extraction of various products such as vegetable oils, fats, flavours, fragrances, colour additives or other bioactive ingredients. As it is classified as a “processing aid”, it does not have to be declared on the label under current legislation. Therefore, although traces of hexane may be found in final products, especially in processed products, its presence is not known to consumers. However, hexane, and in particular the n-hexane isomer, has been shown to be neurotoxic to humans and has even been listed as a cause of occupational diseases in several European countries since the 1970s. In order to support the European strategy for a toxic-free environment (and toxic-free food), it seemed important to collect scientific information on this substance by reviewing the available literature. This review contains valuable information on the nature and origin of the solvent hexane, its applications in the food industry, its toxicological evaluation and possible alternatives for the extraction of natural products. Numerous publications have investigated the toxicity of hexane, and several studies have demonstrated the presence of its toxic metabolite 2,5-hexanedione (2,5-HD) in the urine of the general, non-occupationally exposed population. Surprisingly, a tolerable daily intake (TDI) has apparently never been established by any food safety authority. Since hexane residues are undoubtedly found in various foods, it seems more than necessary to clearly assess the risks associated with this hidden exposure. A clear indication on food packaging and better information on the toxicity of hexane could encourage the industry to switch towards one of the numerous other alternative extraction methods already developed.
Chapter
In keeping with emerging consumer trends, the food industry is continually searching for cheaper and sustainable resources for the production of oils as food ingredients. Corn (maize) is the leading crop all over the world and is consumed as a staple food in many countries. Although corn only contains about 3%–6% of oil, which is less than most of the oilseeds, it has been widely used as cooking oil, frying oil, salad oil, or as an ingredient to prepare other products like margarine, butter, snacks, and bakery products. Corn oil from the germ is preferred by the consumer because of its pleasant taste, light delicate flavor, healthy fatty acid content, and good physical and chemical properties. In addition, corn oil is beneficial for human health since corn oil contains up to 65.5% of linoleic acid, as well as other bioactive compounds, including sterols (β-sitosterol, campesterol, and stigmasterol), phenolic acids, and flavonoids. This chapter summarizes the necessary processing to produce corn oils from the kernels, including corn germ separation by milling, crude oil extraction, and refining. Moreover, the important physical properties and chemical characteristics that impact the quality of corn oil are also highlighted. Finally, the novel utilization of corn oil in the production of various food systems such as emulsions, oleogels, and oleofoams is highlighted.
Article
Full-text available
Over recent years, the food industry has striven to reduce waste, mostly because of rising awareness of the detrimental environmental impacts of food waste. While the edible oils market (mostly represented by soybean oil) is forecasted to reach 632 million tons by 2022, there is increasing interest to produce non-soybean, plant-based oils including, but not limited to, coconut, flaxseed and hemp seed. Expeller pressing and organic solvent extractions are common methods for oil extraction in the food industry. However, these two methods come with some concerns, such as lower yields for expeller pressing and environmental concerns for organic solvents. Meanwhile, supercritical CO2 and enzyme-assisted extractions are recognized as green alternatives, but their practicality and economic feasibility are questioned. Finding the right balance between oil extraction and phytochemical yields and environmental and economic impacts is challenging. This review explores the advantages and disadvantages of various extraction methods from an economic, environmental and practical standpoint. The novelty of this work is how it emphasizes the valorization of seed by-products, as well as the discussion on life cycle, environmental and techno-economic analyses of oil extraction methods.
Article
Full-text available
The FTIR spectroscopy method was developed for the determination of hexane residues in palm and groundnut (peanut) oils. The method was based on horizontal attenuated total reflectance with a ZnSe crystal at 45° at room temperature, and partial least squares (PLS) statistics were used to derive calibration models. The accuracy of the method was comparable to that of the AOCS Method Ca 3b-87, with coefficients of determination (R 2) of 0.9866 and 0.9810 for palm and groundnut oils, respectively, and SE of calibration of 3.83 and 4.91, respectively. The calibration models were validated, and the R 2 of validation and the SE of prediction computed. The SD of the difference for repeatability for the method was comparable to that for the standard AOCS method when used for palm and groundnut oils. With its speed and ease of data manipulation by computer software, FTIR spectroscopy has an advantage over present chemical methods, which require preparation of the oil using toxic solvents before GC.
Article
Extraction of rice bran lipids was performed using supercritical carbon dioxide (SC−CO2) and liquid propane. To provide a basis for extraction efficiency, accelerated solvent extraction with hexane was performed at 100°C and 10.34 MPa. Extraction pressure was varied for propane and SC−CO2 extractions. Also, the role of temperature in SC−CO2 extraction efficiency was investigated at 45,65, and 85°C. For the SC−CO2 experiments, extraction efficiencies were proportional to pressure and inversely proportional to temperature, and the maximal yield of oil achieved using SC−CO2 was 0.222±0.013 kg of oil extracted per kg of rice bran for conditions of 45°C and 35 MPa. The maximal yield achieved with propane was 0.224±0.016 kg of oil per kg of rice bran at 0.76 MPa and ambient temperature. The maximum extraction efficiencies of both SC−CO2 and propane were found to be significantly different from the hexane extraction baseline yield, which was 0.261±0.005 kg oil extracted per kg of rice bran. A simulated economic analysis was performed on the possibility of using SC−CO2 and propane extraction technologies to remove oil from rice bran generated in Mississippi. Although the economic analysis was based on the maximal extraction efficiency for each technology, neither process resulted in a positive rate of return on investment.
Article
Hexane is used to extract edible oils from oleaginous seeds. The detection of hexane in orujo oil is mandatory, as its presence in the final product may negatively affect human health. Headspace-GC is the technique of choice for determining residual solvent in foods. In the present work, a new instrument based on the headspace principle and mass spectrometric detection without chromatographic separation, ChemSensor, is proposed for the direct screening of orujo oil to determine residual hexane. This instrument provided an overall response, corresponding to the volatiles profile, including that of hexane, which could not be directly discriminated. By selecting the m/z values corresponding to n-hexane (major component of commercial hexane), the selectivity of the method was good enough to determine residual hexane in the range of 2.0–65 μg mL−1 (corresponding to 2.3–75.6 mg of hexane per kg of oil) with high precision. The detection limit achieved (0.7 mg per kg of oil) was lower than the maximum residual limit established by the European Union (5 mg per kg of oil). Two multivariate techniques, partial least squares and principal components regression (PCR), were compared with univariate regression; PCR provided the best results.
Article
Three experiments were conducted to compare the nutritional value of soybean meal produced by extraction with 95% isopropyl alcohol (IPA) or hexane (HEX) for swine. The same batch of soybeans and the same processing equipment were used to produce both soybean meals. Analyzed contents of the IPA and HEX meals were, respectively: CP, 48.7, 47.0%; lysine, 3.11, 3.06%; urease, .24, .13 delta pH. In Exp. 1, two soybean meals and dietary lysine at .90 or 1.25% were used in a 2 x 2 factorial arrangement of treatments. Corn-based diets were fed to 32-d-old pigs for 26 d. There were no dietary lysine x soybean meal interactions (P > or = .35). Increasing dietary lysine increased (P < .001) ADG and gain/ feed, but soybean meal source did not affect performance. In Exp. 2, the nutritional value of HEX and IPA meals were evaluated in a N balance study using 34-kg barrows and isonitrogenous corn-based diets containing equal N from either HEX or IPA. Apparent total tract N and DM digestibility were similar for both diets. Nitrogen retention (14.4 vs 13.7 g/d, P < .10) and apparent biological value (56.5 vs 54.5%, P < .05) were slightly higher for HEX than for IPA. The effect of feeding HEX and IPA meals on morphological changes of small intestine in pigs weaned at 21 d of age was investigated in the last experiment. At 28 d of age, weaned pigs that were fed diets containing either HEX or IPA and unweaned control pigs were killed for the examination. Villus height and lamina propria depth at the duodenum were similar among all treatments. At the jejunum, weaned pigs had smaller (P < .05) villus height and greater lamina propria depths (P < .001) than unweaned pigs. Dietary soybean meal source did not affect villus height, but lamina propria depth was less (P < .10) for pigs fed IPA. The results of these experiments indicate that soybean meals produced using IPA or HEX as the solvent have equal nutritional value for swine.
Article
The objective of these investigations has been the determination of volatile organic compounds including residue solvents present in vegetable oil samples. Some olive oil, rape oil, sunflower oil, soy-bean oil, pumpkin oil, grape oil, rice oil as well as hazel-nut oil samples were analysed. Among residue solvents the following compounds have been mentioned: acetone, n-hexane, benzene, and toluene. Some experiments for the solid phase microextraction (SPME)-GC-flame ionisation detection (FID) were performed to examine extraction conditions such as fiber exposure time, temperature of extraction, and temperature of desorption. Various SPME fibers such as polydimethylsiloxane, Carboxen/polydimethylsiloxane and polydimethylsiloxane/divinylbenzene coatings were used for the isolation of tested compounds from vegetable oil samples. After optimisation of SPME, real vegetable oil samples were examined using SPME-GC/MS. Based on preliminary experiments the qualitative and quantitative analyses for the determination of acetone, n-hexane, benzene and toluene were performed by SPME-GC-FID and static head-space (SHS)-GC-FID methods. The regression coefficients for calibration curves for the examined compounds were R(2) > or = 0.992. This shows that the used method is linear in the examined concentration range (0.005-0.119 mg/kg for SPME-GC-FID and 0.003-0.728 mg/kg for SHS-GC-FID). Chemical properties of analysed vegetable oils have been characterised by chemometric procedure (cluster analysis).
  • P J Wan
  • R J Horn
Wan, P.J., and R.J. Horn. ( 1998) INFORM. 9, 707-9.
  • P J Wakelyn
  • P J Wan
Wakelyn, P.J.and Wan, P.J. (2004) INFORM. 15(1), 22-3.
  • E U Directive
Directive, E. U. (2009) Official J Eur Commun 141, 5-11.
  • C.-H Oh
  • Y.-K Kwon
  • Y.-M Jang
  • D.-S Lee
  • J.-S Park
Oh, C.-H., Kwon, Y.-K., Jang, Y.-M., Lee, D.-S.and Park, J.-S. (2005) Food Sci. Biotechnol. 14, 456-460.