- A preview of this full-text is provided by Springer Nature.
- Learn more
Preview content only
Content available from Pattern Analysis and Applications
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Vol.:(0123456789)
1 3
Pattern Analysis and Applications (2019) 22:1243–1292
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10044-019-00804-4
SURVEY
3D object recognition andclassication: asystematic literature review
L.E.Carvalho1,2 · A.vonWangenheim1,2
Received: 3 October 2017 / Accepted: 14 February 2019 / Published online: 27 February 2019
© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019
Abstract
In this paper, we present a systematic literature review concerning 3D object recognition and classification. We cover articles
published between 2006 and 2016 available in three scientific databases (ScienceDirect, IEEE Xplore and ACM), using
the methodology for systematic review proposed by Kitchenham. Based on this methodology, we used tags and exclusion
criteria to select papers about the topic under study. After the works selection, we applied a categorization process aiming
to group similar object representation types, analyzing the steps applied for object recognition, the tests and evaluation
performed and the databases used. Lastly, we compressed all the obtained information in a general overview and presented
future prospects for the area.
Keywords 3D object recognition· 3D object classification· 3D object representation· Systematic literature review
1 Introduction
The 3D object classification and recognition area, in the last
few years, experienced a growing boosted by the populariza-
tion of 3D sensors and the increased availability of 3D object
databases [41]. The methods developed for this purpose are
applied in many domains like robotics, focusing on assist-
ing the robot movement in an environment and perform-
ing object manipulation, security, where the techniques are
employed to detect dangerous objects, and 3D general object
detection, recognizing, for example, objects, faces, ears and
so on.
The seminal works interested in solving 3D/multi-view
object recognition as well as pose estimation started in the
1980s and early 1990s [22, 85, 173, 188, 203, 251, 293],
which, for some authors [48], were considered the founda-
tion of modern object recognition. A detailed history of
3D object recognition can be found in the book Computer
Vision Detection, Recognition and Reconstruction [48]. This
book contains not only a history about works interest in solv-
ing 3D object recognition problems, but also a selection of
articles covering some of the talks and tutorials held during
the first two editions of ICVSS (The International Computer
Vision Summer School) on topics such as Recognition, Reg-
istration and Reconstruction. Each chapter provides an over-
view of these challenging topics with key references to the
existing literature until 2009.
In order to provide a panorama of the area, identifying 3D
object classification and recognition methods and the rep-
resentation types or descriptions employed by those meth-
ods, we performed a systematic literature review. For this
purpose, we employed Kitchenham’s methodology [140]
for systematic literature review, which is a well-established
methodology.
The objectives of this paper are to: (1) present the meth-
odology applied for the present systematic literature review
and (2) perform an overall analysis aiming to identify the
3D object representation types, the general structure used in
the analyzed works and how the evaluation and validation
were performed.
The novelty in this review is twofold: First, to the author’s
knowledge, this is the first time that Kitchenham’s meth-
odology is applied for 3D object recognition. Second, dif-
ferently from previous reviews for 3D object recognition,
where the search was restricted to a specific type of method,
we defined a 10-year window as our only search restriction
* L. E. Carvalho
lcarvalho@incod.ufsc.br
A. von Wangenheim
aldo.vw@ufsc.br
1 Graduate Program inComputer Science, Federal University
ofSanta Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil
2 Image Processing andComputer Graphics Lab, National
Brazilian Institute forDigital Convergence, Federal
University ofSanta Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.