- A preview of this full-text is provided by Springer Nature.
- Learn more
Preview content only
Content available from Sports Medicine
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Vol.:(0123456789)
Sports Medicine (2019) 49:905–916
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-019-01085-x
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
Acute Eects ofResistance Exercise onCognitive Function inHealthy
Adults: ASystematic Review withMultilevel Meta‑Analysis
JanWilke1 · FlorianGiesche1· KristinaKlier1· LutzVogt1· EvaHerrmann2· WinfriedBanzer1
Published online: 6 March 2019
© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019
Abstract
Background Recent research has revealed a beneficial impact of chronic resistance exercise (RE) on brain function. However,
it is unclear as to whether RE is also effective in an acute setting.
Objective To investigate the immediate effects of a single RE session on cognitive performance in healthy adults.
Methods A multilevel meta-analysis with random effects meta-regression model was used to pool the standardized mean
differences (SMD) between RE and no-exercise (NEX) as well as between RE and aerobic exercise (AE). In addition to
global cognitive function, effects on reported sub-domains (inhibitory control, cognitive flexibility, working memory, atten-
tion) were examined.
Results Twelve trials with fair methodological quality (PEDro scale) were identified. Compared to NEX, RE had a positive
effect on global cognition (SMD: 0.56, 95% CI 0.22–0.90, p = 0.004), but was not superior to AE (SMD: −0.10, 95% CI
0.01 to −0.20, p = 0.06). Regarding cognitive sub-domains, RE, compared to NEX, improved inhibitory control (SMD:
0.73, 95% CI 0.21–1.26, p = 0.01) and cognitive flexibility (SMD: 0.36, 95% CI 0.17–0.55, p = 0.004). In contrast, working
memory (SMD: 0.35, 95% CI −0.05 to 0.75, p = 0.07) and attention (SMD: 0.79, 95% CI −0.42 to 2.00, p = 0.16) remained
unaffected. No significant differences in sub-domains were found between RE and AE (p > 0.05).
Conclusion RE appears to be an appropriate method to immediately enhance cognitive function in healthy adults. Further
studies clearly elucidating the impact of effect modifiers such as age, training intensity, or training duration are warranted.
* Jan Wilke
wilke@sport.uni-frankfurt.de
1 Department ofSports Medicine, Goethe University
Frankfurt, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
2 Institute ofBiostatistics andMathematical Modeling, Goethe
University Frankfurt, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
Key Points
Previous literature shows that several weeks of resistance
training induces moderate improvements in cognitive
function.
A single bout of resistance exercise leads to moderate
improvements in cognitive function when compared to a
no-exercise control.
The acute effects of resistance exercise are not superior
to those occurring after aerobic exercise.
The impact of effect modifiers such as age, training dura-
tion, or training intensity needs to be further elucidated.
1 Introduction
Engagement in physical activity represents a well-estab-
lished method to elicit health-beneficial effects in a vari-
ety of peripheral organs such as the skeletal muscles, the
heart, or the lungs [1]. Over recent decades, the poten-
tial impact of regular movement on brain morphology
and function has evolved as another focus of research.
Accumulating evidence suggests the occurrence of train-
ing-induced cerebral adaptations that may help to pre-
vent or delay cognitive decline and neurodegenerative
diseases; according to data from animal experiments,
chronic exercise promotes synaptic plasticity, angiogen-
esis, and neurogenesis [2–4]. Human studies have, fur-
thermore, demonstrated the expression of brain-derived
neurotrophic factor (BDNF), as well as increases in hip-
pocampal brain volume, in response to several weeks of
training [5]. It has been hypothesized that the described
exercise-induced changes in the brain, functionally, result
in enhanced cognitive performance. This seems plausible
as, for instance, angiogenesis allows enhanced perfusion
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.