PosterPDF Available

How Experiential Education Can Contribute to a Balanced Emotional and Social Development of All Children and Youth. A Theory Map for Enriching the University Students' Learning Experience

Authors:

Abstract

What Experiential Education is and why it is so important for a balanced emotional and social development of children and youth is explained very clearly on the website of the Association for Experiential Education (AEE). AEE is the leading international association for Experiential Education, Outdoor– and Adventure Education, Adventure Therapy, Wilderness Therapy etc. Experiential Education is defined by AEE like this: „Challenge and Experience followed by Reflection leading to Learning and Growth.“ This definition is spelled out by the following descriptions and explanations: „Experiential education is a philosophy that informs many methodologies in which educators purposefully engage with learners in direct experience and focused reflection in order to increase knowledge, develop skills, clarify values, and develop people's capacity to contribute to their communities.“ The core principles of Experiential Education are the following: „Experiential learning occurs when carefully chosen experiences are supported by reflection, critical analysis and synthesis. Experiences are structured to require the learner to take initiative, make decisions and be accountable for results. Throughout the experiential learning process, the learner is actively engaged in posing questions, investigating, experimenting, being curious, solving problems, assuming responsibility, being creative, and constructing meaning. Learners are engaged intellectually, emotionally, socially, soulfully and/or physically. This involvement produces a perception that the learning task is authentic. The results of the learning are personal and form the basis for future experience and learning. Relationships are developed and nurtured: learner to self, learner to others and learner to the world at large. The educator and learner may experience success, failure, adventure, risk-taking and uncertainty, because the outcomes of experience cannot totally be predicted. Opportunities are nurtured for learners and educators to explore and examine their own values. The educator's primary roles include setting suitable experiences, posing problems, setting boundaries, supporting learners, insuring physical and emotional safety, and facilitating the learning process. The educator recognizes and encourages spontaneous opportunities for learning. Educators strive to be aware of their biases, judgments and pre-conceptions, and how these influence the learner. The design of the learning experience includes the possibility to learn from natural consequences, mistakes and successes“ (Website, AEE).
How Experiential Education Can Contribute to a Balanced Emotional and Social
Development of All Children and Youth
A Theory Map for Enriching the University Students´ Learning Experience
Joachim Broecher, Regina Künzler-Knufinke, Julia M. Siebert, Anette Steimann
University of Flensburg, Flensburg Germany
Department for the Education of Children and Youth with Emotional, Social, and Behavioral Difficulties
References,
for further reading and in-depth studies…
Arai, S.M., Mock, S.E. and Gallant, K.A. (2011). Childhood traumas, mental health and physical
health in adulthood: Testing physically active leisure as a buffer.
Leisure/Loisir,
35(4), 407-422
Attarian, A. (2001). Trends in outdoor adventure education.
Journal of Experiential Education
, 24
(3), 141-149
Baldwin, C., Persing, J. and Magnuson, D. (2004). The role of theory, research, and evaluation in
adventure education.
Journal of Experiential Education
, 26(3), 167-183
Beightol, J., Jevertson, J., Carter, S., Gray, S. and Gass, M. (2012). Adventure education and resi-
lience enhancement.
Journal of Experiential Education
, 35(2), 307-325
Berger, R. (2006). Using contact with nature, creativity and rituals as a therapeutic medium with
children with learning difficulties: A case study.
Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties
, 11(2),
135-146
Berry, M. and Hodgson, C. (Eds) (2011).
Adventure education: An introduction
. London: Rout-
ledge
Bisson, C. and Luckner, J. (1996). Fun in learning: The pedagogical role of fun in adventure edu-
cation.
Journal of Experiential Education
, 19(2), 108-113
Bobilya, A.J., Kalisch, K. and Daniel, B. (2011). An investigation of the Outward Bound final ex-
pedition.
Journal of Experiential Education
, 33(4), 356-359
Broecher, J. (2015). How David P. Weikart´s HighScope Summer Camp for (Gifted) Teenagers be-
came a sustainable model for my later work in special education and inclusive education.
Gifted
Education International
, 31(3), 244-256, Download
Broecher, J., Davis, J.H., Matthews, K., Painter, J., and Pasour, K. (2014). How transatlantic work-
shops and field trips can make German-American university-partnerships an active learning space.
Internationalisation of Higher Education,
Vol. 2, 18-42, Download
Daniel, B., Bobilya, A.J., Kalisch, K.R. and McAvoy, L.H. (2014). Autonomous student experi-
ences in outdoor and adventure education.
Journal of Experiential Education
, 37(1), 4-17
Ewert, A.W. and Sibthorp, J. (2014).
Outdoor adventure education: Foundations, theory, and rese-
arch
. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics
Fischer, R.L. and Attah, E.B. (2001). City kids in the wilderness: A pilot-test of Outward Bound
for foster care group home youth.
Journal of Experiential Education
, 24(2), 109-117
Fox, K. (2008). Rethinking experience: What do we mean by this word “experience”?
Journal of
Experiential Education,
31(1), 36-54
Fox, P. and Avramidis, E. (2003). An evaluation of an outdoor education programme for students
with emotional and behavioural difficulties.
Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties
, 8(4), 267-283
Garst, B., Scheider, I. and Baker, D. (2001). Outdoor adventure program participation impacts on
adolescent self-perception.
Journal of Experiential Education
, 24(1), 41-49
Gillard, A., Roark, M.F., Ramsey Kanyiba Nyaga, L. and Bialeschki, M.D. (2011). Measuring
mindfulness in summer camp staff.
Journal of Experiential Education
, 34(1), 87-95
Griffin, J. (2003). The effects of an adventure based program with an explicit spiritual component
of the spiritual growth of adolescents.
Journal of Experiential Education
, 25(3), 351
Haluza-DeLay, R. (1999). The culture that constrains: Experience of “Natureas part of a wilder-
ness adventure program.
Journal of Experiential Education
, 22(3), 129-137
Kaly, P.W. and Heesacker, M. (2003). Effects of a ship-based adventure program on adolescent
self-esteem and ego-identity development.
Journal of Experiential Education
, 26(2), 97-104
Larivière, M., Couture, R., Ritchie, S.D., Côté, D., Oddson, B. and Wright, J. (2012). Behavioural
assessment of wilderness therapy participants: Exploring the consistency of observational data.
Journal of Experiential Education
, 35(1), 290-302
Larson, B.A. (2007). Adventure camp programs, self-concept, and their effects on behavioral prob-
lem adolescents.
Journal of Experiential Education
, 29(3), 313-330
Louv, R. (2016).
Vitamin N. The essential guide to a nature-rich life
. Chapel Hill, NC: Algonquin
Books
Louv, R. (2012).
The Nature Principle: Reconnecting with life in a virtual age
. Chapel Hill, NC: Al-
gonquin Books
Louv, R. (2008).
Last child in the woods: Saving our children from nature-deficit disorder
(revised
and updated edition). Chapel Hill, NC: Algonquin Books
Maxwell, R., Perry, M. and Martin A.J. (2008). An evaluation of dropouts from Outward Bound
Programs for the unemployed.
Journal of Experiential Education
, 30(3), 223-235
Nicolson, M. (2013).
Aims and experience in outdoor education
. Saarbrücken: Lambert Academic
Publishing
Norton, C.L., Tucker, A., Russell, K.C., Bettmann, J.E., Gass, M.A., Gillis, L. and Behrens, E.
(2014). Adventure therapy with youth.
Journal of Experiential Education
, 37(1), 46-59
Russell, K.C. (2003). A nation-wide survey of outdoor behavioral healthcare programs for adole-
scents with problem behaviors.
Journal of Experiential Education
, 25(3), 322-331
Sheard, M. and Golby, J. (2006). The efficacy of an outdoor adventure education curriculum on sel-
ected aspects of positive psychological development.
Journal of Experiential Education
, 29(2), 187-
209
Shirilla, P. (2009). Adventure-based programming and social skill development in the lives of diver-
se youth: Perspectives from two research projects.
Journal of Experiential Education
, 31(3), 410-
414
Sibthorp, J. (2010). A letter from the editor: Positioning outdoor and adventure programs within po-
sitive youth development.
Journal of Experiential Education
, 33, vi-ix
Sibthorp, J. and Arthur-Banning, S. (2004). Developing life effectiveness through adventure educa-
tion: The roles of participant expectations, perceptions of empowerment, and learning relevance.
Journal of Experiential Education,
27(1), 32-50
Sibthorp, J. and Jostad, J. (2014). The social system in outdoor adventure education programs.
Jour-
nal of Experiential Education
, 37(1), 60-74
Sibthorp, J., Paisley, K., Gookin, J. and Furman, N. (2008). The pedagogic value of student autono-
my in adventure education.
Journal of Experiential Education
, 31(2), 136-151
Smith, C. (1998). Incredible hulks: Ship schools and the reformatory movement.
Emotional and Be-
havioural Difficulties
, 3(1), 20-24
Veevers, N. and Allison, P. (2011).
Kurt Hahn: Inspirational, visionary, outdoor and experiential
educator
. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers
Warren, K. and Mitten, D. (eds.) (2008).
Theory and practice of Experiential Education
. Boulder,
CO: Association for Experiential Education
Warren, K., Roberts, N.S., Breunig, M. and Alvarez, M.A.G. (2014). Social justice in outdoor expe-
riential education: A state of knowledge review.
Journal of Experiential Education
, 37(1), 89-103
Wattchow, B. and Brown, M. (2011).
A pedagogy of place: Outdoor education for a changing world
.
Clayton: Monash University Publishing
Wojcikiewicz, S.K. and Mural, Z.B. (2010). A Deweyian framework for youth development in ex-
periential education: Perspectives from sail training and sailing instruction.
Journal of Experiential
Education
, 33(2), 105-119
Zmudy, M.H., Curtner-Smith, M.D. and Steffen, J. (2009). Ecology and task structures in adventure
education.
Journal of Experiential Education,
31(3), 319-340
What Experiential Education is and why it is so important for a balanced
emotional and social development of children and youth is explained very
clearly on the website of the Association for Experiential Education (AEE).
AEE is the leading international association for Experiential Education,
Outdoor– and Adventure Education, Adventure Therapy, Wilderness Thera-
py etc.
Experiential Education is defined by AEE like this: Challenge and Experi-
ence followed by Reflection leading to Learning and Growth.“
This definition is spelled out by the following descriptions and explana-
tions:
„Experiential education is a philosophy that informs many methodologies
in which educators purposefully engage with learners in direct experience
and focused reflection in order to increase knowledge, develop skills, cla-
rify values, and develop people's capacity to contribute to their communi-
ties.“
The core principles of Experiential Education are the following:
„Experiential learning occurs when carefully chosen experiences are sup-
ported by reflection, critical analysis and synthesis.
Experiences are structured to require the learner to take initiative, make de-
cisions and be accountable for results.
Throughout the experiential learning process, the learner is actively enga-
ged in posing questions, investigating, experimenting, being curious, sol-
ving problems, assuming responsibility, being creative, and constructing
meaning.
Learners are engaged intellectually, emotionally, socially, soulfully and/or
physically.
This involvement produces a perception that the learning task is authentic.
The results of the learning are personal and form the basis for future experi-
ence and learning.
Relationships are developed and nurtured: learner to self, learner to others
and learner to the world at large.
The educator and learner may experience success, failure, adventure, risk-
taking and uncertainty, because the outcomes of experience cannot totally
be predicted.
Opportunities are nurtured for learners and educators to explore and exami-
ne their own values.
The educator's primary roles include setting suitable experiences, posing
problems, setting boundaries, supporting learners, insuring physical and
emotional safety, and facilitating the learning process.
The educator recognizes and encourages spontaneous opportunities for lear-
ning.
Educators strive to be aware of their biases, judgments and pre-conceptions,
and how these influence the learner.
The design of the learning experience includes the possibility to learn from
natural consequences, mistakes and successes“ (Website, AEE).
Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming, Photo: J.B.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
Allowing students a sense of autonomy has long been considered an important pedagogical tool. This paper synthesizes the current literature on student autonomy from the education, youth development, and outdoor adventure fields and explores its value through an analysis of data from the National Outdoor Leadership School (NOLS). The results supported the two main hypotheses: Developmental outcomes are related to participants' perceptions of autonomy, and autonomous student expeditions (ASE) provide students with authentic and meaningful opportunities to experience autonomy during adventure education programs. A secondary analysis found that injury, evacuation, and near-miss rates were no different during ASEs than when students are accompanied by instructors. Despite these findings, the use of ASEs remains controversial. Implications for research and practice are discussed.
Article
Full-text available
Many components of the social system interact with one another to produce group-level behavior that determines the functionality of the small group in outdoor adventure education (OAE). This article synthesizes the contemporary literature and theory regarding eight aspects of the OAE social system: (a) Macro Contextual Factors, (b) Student Factors, (c) Instructor Factors, (d) Goals, (e) Group Factors, (f) Group Outcomes, (g) Group Dependent Individual Outcomes, and (h) Time. Directions for future research and implications for OAE are discussed.
Article
Full-text available
Ten-day workshops and field trips had a key role in the partnership between a university of applied sciences in East Germany and a small private liberal arts college in North Carolina. This case study evaluates activities and programs from the involved faculty´s perspective. The authors look at the underlying institutional process, they discuss organization and content of the programs, and reflect the learning experiences of the participating students. Conclusions are drawn for a further program development and with regard to internationalization strategies. Link zur Seite des Verlages und zum ursprünglichen Erscheinungsort des Artikels: http://www.handbook-internationalisation.com/en/handbuch/gliederung/#/Beitragsdetailansicht/176/457/How-Transatlantic-Workshops-and-Field-Trips-Can-Make-German-American-University-Partnerships-an-Active-Learning-Space
Article
This paper uses autoethnography to reassess the concept “experience” and the lack of theoretical frameworks within experiential education for delimiting experience within the practices and research around experiential, adventure, and outdoor education. Although a pivotal and essential part of practice, theoretical understandings of experience have been missing in experiential education scholarship. Experience is clearly a complex, constructed “reality.” Jagger (cited in Lauritzen, 1997, p. 83) has pointed out that an appeal to experience is “fraught with methodological difficulties.” What exactly is experience? Whose experience is heard? Like other disciplines, for example the studies of religions and psychology, experiential education has no rigorous definitions, characterizations, typologies, or conceptualizations of the focus of its study and practice—a type of experience. Drawing upon critiques from Indigenous, feminist, postcolonial, and black Americans and Canadians, and integrating with an autoethnographic approach, this paper provides a critique of the existing use of “experience” and sketches an initial approach for developing theoretical understandings of the central phenomenon of experiential, adventure, and outdoor education.
Article
In this piece, we put forth a Deweyian framework for youth development activities in outdoor and adventure education programs, and we show how such a framework may be exemplified by activities in sail training and sailing instruction. The paper begins with a discussion of the theoretical features of Deweyian educational experiences and makes connections between these ideas and positive youth development. We then, by reference to the educational activities aboard vessels large and small, provide concrete illustrations of these theoretical features. The goal of the paper is to propose a framework that educators in outdoor and adventure programs—and in youth development programs generally—can employ to bring Dewey's ideas to bear on program design and assessment.
Book
Outdoor Adventure Education: Foundations, Theory, and Research steeps students in the theories, concepts, and developments of outdoor adventure education, preparing them for careers in this burgeoning field. This text is based on author Alan W. Ewert’s pioneering book Outdoor Adventure Pursuits: Foundations, Models, and Theories. Ewert and Sibthorp, both experienced practitioners, researchers, and educators, explore the outdoor adventure field today in relation to the changes that have occurred since Ewert’s first book. The authors present a comprehensive text on outdoor and adventure foundations, theories, and research that will provide the basis for the next generation of professionals. Outdoor Adventure Education offers a comprehensive view of the expanding discipline of outdoor adventure education in its various settings. In addition to its foundational, theoretical, and conceptual insights, this text presents the following: • Why This Chapter Is Important introductions that present snapshots of ideas and concepts and how they apply to future professionals • Chapter discussion and research questions to expand knowledge and research skills to support the learning gained through the book • Sidebars from well-known international researchers who present their views on the chapter topics The book is presented in three parts. Part I explores foundational issues of outdoor adventure education, offering an overview of the field and examining both historical developments and current practices. Part II investigates theoretical constructs and extant theories, emphasizing how they inform the professional’s view of program evidence, design, and implementation. In part III, the authors delve into research and evidence-based practices in the field and look at evolving trends and issues as outdoor adventure education continues to grow. Outdoor Adventure Education uses evidence, design, and implementation as its underlying themes. It shows students and professionals how to apply theories and research in constructing frameworks for outdoor adventure education experiences and how to evaluate those experiences. As such, it is an indispensable resource that prepares students and professionals alike for success in their careers in outdoor adventure education.
Article
This article explores the current state of knowledge regarding the use of autonomous student experiences (ASE) in outdoor and adventure education (OAE) programs. ASE are defined as components (e.g., solo, final expedition) in which participants have a greater measure of choice and control over the planning, execution, and outcomes of their learning. The article discusses the importance of ASE in experiential education and reviews major findings and supporting evidence in the relevant literature. Outward Bound and the National Outdoor Leadership School are highlighted as OAE programs that incorporate evidence-based research into their course designs. The article concludes with an examination of existing gaps in the knowledge and a discussion of topics for future ASE research.