ArticlePDF Available

Prospective observational study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the pollen extract Sérélys ® in the management of women with menopausal symptoms

Taylor & Francis
Gynecological Endocrinology
Authors:
  • Exeltis Germany GmbH

Abstract and Figures

Safety concerns or contraindications to the use of hormones have resulted in a rise of the use of herbal medicinal products for the management of menopausal symptoms. The pollen extract Sérélys® represents, due to its ingredients and mode of action, a new and innovative alternative for the management of these symptoms. The aim of the present study was to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of Sérélys®. A prospective, open, observational, and multicentre study was performed on 104 menopausal women. The patients received over 3 months the pollen extract Sérélys® containing the extracts PI82 and GC Fem in a dosage of twice 160 mg extract and 5 mg vitamin E. Using a validated menopausal rating score, the improvement of menopausal symptoms was recorded. A significant decrease of different menopausal symptoms was observed between the starting point of the study and after 12 weeks (p < .0001). Hot flashes were reduced by 48.5%, sleep disturbance by 50.1%, depressive mood by 51.2%, irritability by 47.9%, fatigue by 47.8%, vaginal dryness by 39.63% and muscles and joint pain by 27.4%. The pollen extract Sérélys® reduced significant menopausal symptoms showing a very low side effect profile.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at
https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=igye20
Gynecological Endocrinology
ISSN: 0951-3590 (Print) 1473-0766 (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/igye20
Prospective observational study to evaluate the
efficacy and safety of the pollen extract Sérélys®
in the management of women with menopausal
symptoms
Tomas Fait, Manuela Sailer & Pedro-Antonio Regidor
To cite this article: Tomas Fait, Manuela Sailer & Pedro-Antonio Regidor (2019): Prospective
observational study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the pollen extract Sérélys® in the
management of women with menopausal symptoms, Gynecological Endocrinology, DOI:
10.1080/09513590.2018.1538347
To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/09513590.2018.1538347
Published online: 10 Feb 2019.
Submit your article to this journal
Article views: 12
View Crossmark data
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Prospective observational study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the pollen
extract S
er
elys
V
R
in the management of women with menopausal symptoms
Tomas Fait
a
, Manuela Sailer
b
and Pedro-Antonio Regidor
b
a
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Prague, Prague, Czech Republic;
b
Exeltis Healthcare,
Ismaning, Germany
ABSTRACT
Safety concerns or contraindications to the use of hormones have resulted in a rise of the use of herbal
medicinal products for the management of menopausal symptoms. The pollen extract S
er
elys
V
R
repre-
sents, due to its ingredients and mode of action, a new and innovative alternative for the management
of these symptoms. The aim of the present study was to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of S
er
elys
V
R
.
A prospective, open, observational, and multicentre study was performed on 104 menopausal women.
The patients received over 3 months the pollen extract S
er
elys
V
R
containing the extracts PI82 and GC Fem
in a dosage of twice 160 mg extract and 5 mg vitamin E. Using a validated menopausal rating score, the
improvement of menopausal symptoms was recorded. A significant decrease of different menopausal
symptoms was observed between the starting point of the study and after 12weeks (p<.0001). Hot
flashes were reduced by 48.5%, sleep disturbance by 50.1%, depressive mood by 51.2%, irritability by
47.9%, fatigue by 47.8%, vaginal dryness by 39.63% and muscles and joint pain by 27.4%. The pollen
extract S
er
elys
V
R
reduced significant menopausal symptoms showing a very low side effect profile.
ARTICLE HISTORY
Received 25 July 2018
Revised 3 October 2018
Accepted 16 October 2018
Published online 6 February
2019
KEYWORDS
Pollen extract; menopause;
non-estrogenic activity
Introduction
Menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) is, according to the
International Menopausal Society (IMS), the most effective treat-
ment of vasomotor symptoms in menopause. The basis of this
treatment is the application of estrogens alone or in combination
with progestogens. Many women still have contraindications to
these hormones or prefer a non-hormonal approach to the man-
agement of these vasomotor symptoms. Safety issues play, on the
other side, also an important role in the management of this dis-
order that affects up to 70% of the women entering menopause
[1]. Upon others, anti-depressants, phytoestrogens, acupuncture,
traditional Chinese medicine have been used as non-hormonal
methods against vasomotor symptoms [2]. Even though the
NAMS position statement of 2015 described the data situation of
herbal therapies as insufficient regarding clinical data [3].
Nevertheless, pollen extracts and Vitamin E were mentioned in
this report adding the fact that more data should be gener-
ated [3].
Intensity and frequency of hot flashes and night sweating are
directly related to sleep disturbance and emotional instability,
leading to stress which again re-increases sensitivity to hot
flashes [4].
Although MHT is the most effective treatment for these prob-
lems after the publications of the Womens Health Initiative
study in 2002 [5], a constant decrease in the number of users of
hormones can be registered. In the United States, the use of
MHT fell from 38.3% in 2000 to 6.7% in 2010 within the age
group 50 and 59 [6]. In addition to the consumers fears, MHT
is contraindicated for women with breast cancer, cardiovascular
diseases like thrombotic events or strokes in their clinical history
or hepatic diseases [2]. However, even phytoestrogens with a low
efficacy activate estrogen receptors creating safety concern in
regard of its mode of action especially for women with breast
cancer in their history [7]. Daidzein and genistein in high con-
centration stimulate the growth of breast cancer cells [8].
Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) inhibit the activity
of the enzyme CYP2D6 and thus reduce the conversion of the
prodrug tamoxifen to the biological drug endoxifen [9,10]; even
if those anti-depressants are commonly used by women with
breast cancer.
In this context the use of a special pollen extract (S
er
elys
V
R
)
represents an alternative and promising tool in the management
of vasomotor symptoms in the menopause. After extraction of
the active ingredients of the pollen, only the content of the intine
(=purified cytoplasm of pollen) of the pollen grain is used. Due
to this technique, the risk of allergic reactions is reduced.
While some widely used bee products containing whole pol-
len grain and they are a variable blend of different plants pollen,
the patented pollen extracts PI82/GC Fem (S
er
elys
V
R
) are exactly
defined monocultures. The monocultures used contains pollen
from rye (secale cereal), scots pine (pinus sylvestris), cocks-foot
(dactylis glomerata) and maize (zea mays). During the cultivation
processes, pesticides and artificial fertilizers are not used. About
5 g of extract is obtained from 1 kg of flowers.
Muntzig et al. [11] could describe that these two extracts
show no biological estrogenic activity as the used uterotropic test
on rats was negative.
These pollen extracts exert their mode of action like SSRI as
they inhibit the reuptake intake of tritiated serotonin in rat cor-
tical synaptosomes. This mechanism is supposed to influence the
sleep and the thermoregulation. However, in contrast to the clas-
sical SSRI S
er
elys
V
R
does not influence the enzymes responsible
for the metabolism of tamoxifen [12].
CONTACT Pedro-Antonio Regidor pedro-antonio.regidor@exeltis.com Exeltis Healthcare, Adalperostr. 84, 85737 Ismaning, Germany
ß2019 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group
GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY
https://doi.org/10.1080/09513590.2018.1538347
The aim of this study was therefore to perform a prospective,
open evaluation of the effectiveness of the pollen extract S
er
elys
V
R
in
the improvement of vasomotor symptoms upon menopausal women.
Patients and methods
A multicentre study of the clinical effect of the pollen extract
PI82/GC Fem (S
er
elys
V
R
) took place in the Czech Republic and
Slovak Republic from October 2016 till March 2017. A total of
104 women between 50 and 70 years of age with the climacteric
syndromes were included. The patients used twice per day
S
er
elys
V
R
(160 mg of PCP and 5 mg of vitamin E per tablet) for 3
months. To assess the efficacy of the treatment, the menopausal
rating scale score from Heinemann et al. [13] was used. At the
beginning and then at the end of each month the study partici-
pants answered the questions of this score system.
Ratings were as follows: 0 points ¼no menopausal symptoms,
1 point ¼moderate menopausal symptoms, 2 points ¼medium
menopausal symptoms, 3 points ¼strong menopausal symptoms,
4 points ¼very strong menopausal symptoms.
The data were processed by disposable descriptive statistics
with determination of pvalues. Standard deviation values were
evaluated and are shown in the figures.
Results
A highly significant decrease (p<.0001) in the extent of com-
plaints was recorded for the following symptoms:
Hot flashes
A global reduction by 48.5% was observed after a 3-month treat-
ment. The starting score was 2.81 points and the final evaluated
score was 1.37 (SD ¼0.51). The sleep disturbance improvement
was 50.1% with a reduction in the score from 2.59 points to 1.3
points (SD ¼0.48). The symptom depressive mood improved by
51.2% (from 2.09 points to 1.07 points with a SD of 0.40 (see
Figure 1). The symptom irritability improved by 47.9% (point
reduction from 2.19 to 1.14 with a SD of 0.24. The symptom
fatigue improved by 47.8% (point reduction from 2.09 to 1.0
points with a SD of 0.41 (see Figure 2). The recorded symptom
vaginal dryness improved by 39.63% (point reduction from 1.65
to 0.65 with a SD of 0.16) and the symptoms muscles and joint
pain by 27.4% (point reduction from 1.46 to 0.4 with a SD of
1.6; see Figure 3).
No difference was recorded between women neither in the
Czech Republic and the Slovak Republic. No undesirable side
effects were recorded.
The results are summarized in Table 1.
Discussion
Initially, the extract administered in doses of 160, mg twice a day
was studied in women with a premenstrual syndrome. In this mul-
ticentre, placebo-controlled, double-blind prospective study with
an intervention period of 2 months a statistically significant
improvement of the symptoms was proved in the group of 32
patients when active ingredient was given against placebo [14].
The efficacy in women with a premenstrual syndrome was
also proven in another study were a double-blind, randomized,
placebo-controlled, prospective protocol compared 50 women
receiving the extract and 51 women receiving placebo for 4
months [15].
After proving efficacy in women with a premenstrual syn-
drome the first data suggesting that vasomotor symptoms could
be treated was shown in by Winther et al. [16]. Using a meno-
pausal rating scale, a significant decrease in hot flashes by 23%
since the end of the 2
nd
month of the treatment (p<.001 com-
paring to the initial value and p<.026 comparing to placebo)
was observed due to the use of S
er
elys
V
R
[16].
Following this trial in a French open multicentre placebo-con-
trolled study, 417 post-menopausal women received S
er
elys
V
R
twice per day. After 3 months, a significant improvement regard-
ing hot flashes both in frequency (65%) (p¼.0659) and intensity
(64%) (p¼.0003) was described. Other symptoms like sweating,
irritability and fatigue also improved considerably [17].
Druckmann et al. [18] could also show in an open multicentre
study, a significant improvement of the classical vasomotor
symptoms and other menopausal-related symptoms after the use
of S
er
elys
V
R
against placebo over 90 d. A significant decrease
(p<.0001) was recorded for hot flashes, irritability. In addition,
72% of women reported a better quality of life with high toler-
ance to the extract (98.7%) [18].
Figure 1. Improvement of the symptoms hot flashes, sleep disturbances and depression after 3months of treatment with the pollen extract S
er
elys (p<.0001).
2 T. FAIT ET AL.
The presented data of this open study reaffirms the existing
data. S
er
elys
V
R
not only improved the menopausal symptoms but
also sowed minimal side effects.
The only weakness of this trial was that it was not a placebo
controlled one. But if we assume that a placebo effect especially
in the reduction of vasomotor symptoms can reach up to 33% of
the starting point [19], the obtained results are still above this
and in the range of the results observed when placebo was com-
pared to the use of SSRI. A reduction of almost 50% for the
symptoms hot flashes, irritability, sleeping disorders and depres-
sion also explain the postulated mode of action via inhibition of
serotonin reuptake.
The relevance of these findings is that a non-hormonal treat-
ment option for the improvement of menopausal symptoms is
available even for women that have suffered a breast cancer.
S
er
elys
V
R
can be considered as a safe product as it has no effect of
the growth of cell cancer lines. Seeger et al. [20] could recently
show that breast cancer cell lines with and without the progester-
one membrane component-1 (PGRMC-1) exhibit no growth when
treated even with ultra-high dosages of the pollen extract [20].
One unanswered question is, if long-term users of S
er
elys
V
R
still will benefit from this herbal product or if with the time a
lack of efficacy can occur. Therefore, long-term studies must be
performed to answer this question.
Figure 2. Improvement of the symptoms irritability and fatigue after 3 months of treatment with the pollen extract S
er
elys (p<.0001).
Figure 3. Improvement of the symptoms vaginal dryness and muscular pain after 3 months of treatment with the pollen extract S
er
elys (p<.0001).
Table 1. Developement of the scores of all investigated symptoms.
Observed symptom Before therapy 1
st
month 2
nd
month 3
rd
month
Overall
improvement
Improvement
in % pvalue
Hot flashes 2.82 2.28 1.8 1.46 1.37 48.5 7.21E-11
Sleep disturbance 2.59 2.09 1.57 1.33 1.3 50.1 1.88E-07
Depression 2.09 1.77 1.37 1.02 1.07 51.2 3.55E-07
Irritability 2.19 1.73 1.42 1.05 1.14 47.9 7.46E-08
Fatigue 2.09 1.73 1.39 1.09 1.0 47.9 3.56E-07
Vaginal dryness 1.64 1.38 1.19 0.96 0.65 39.6 1.73E-20
Muscles and joint pain 1.46 1.37 1.12 1.06 0.4 27.4 1.76E-20
GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY 3
Conclusion
In this prospective, open, multicentre study S
er
elys
V
R
,asan
herbal product, was able to reduce significantly menopausal
symptoms as vasomotor symptoms, fatigue, irritability, depres-
sion, or vaginal dryness. In view of the zero-estrogenic activity of
the extract, the therapy is suitable even for women for whom
receiving estrogens are contraindicated or can be dangerous due
to possible side effects.
Disclosure statement
Manule Sailer and Pedro-Antonio Regidor are employees of Exeltis
Healthcare. Thomas Fait has no conflict of interest.
References
[1] Regidor PA. Progesterone in peri- and prstmenopause: a review.
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2014;74:9951002.
[2] Baber RJ, Panay N, Fenton A. 2016 IMS recommendations on wom-
ens midlife health and menopause hormone therapy. Climacteric.
2016;19:109150.
[3] Nonhormonal management of menopause-associeted vasomotor
symptoms: 2015 position statement of The North American
Menopasue Society. Menopause. 2015;11:11551172.
[4] Archer DF, Sturdee DF, Baber R, et al. Menopausal hot flushes and
night sweats: where are we now? Climacteric. 2011;14:515528.
[5] Rossouw JE, Anderson GL, Prentice RL, et al. Risks and benefits of
estrogen plus progestin in healthy postmenopausal women: principal
results from the Womens Health Initiative randomized controlled
trial. JAMA. 2002;288(3):321333.
[6] Lobo RA. Where are we 10 years after the womens health initiative?
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98:17711780.
[7] Espi
e M. Bouff
ees de chaleur et cancer du sein: Quelle prise en
charge efficace et sans risque? Cancers au F
eminin. 2013;1:116.
[8] de Lemos LM. Effects of soy phytoestrogens genistein and daidzein
on breast cancer growth. Ann Pharmacother. 2001;35:11181121.
[9] Orleans RJ, Li L, Kim MJ, et al. FDA approval of paroxetine for
menopausal hot flushes. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:17771779.
[10] Zembutsu H, Sasa M, Kiyotani K, et al. Should CYP2D6 inhibitors be
administered in conjunction with tamoxifen? Expert Rev Anticancer
Ther. 2011;11:185193.
[11] Hellstr
om AC, Muntzing J. The pollen extract Femal - a nonestro-
genic alternative to hormone therapy in women with menopausal
symptoms. Menopause. 2012;19:825829.
[12] Goldstein SR, Espi
e M, Druckman R. Does purifies Swedish pollen
extract, a nonhormonal treatment for vasomotor symptoms, inhibit
the CYP2D6 enzyme system? Menopause. 2015;22(11):12121214
[13] Heinemann LAJ, Potthoff P, Schneider HPG. International versions
of the Menopause Rating Scale (MRS). Health Qual Life Outcome.
2003;1:2832.
[14] Winther K, Hedman CH. Assesment of the tolerance and effective-
ness of a food suplement Fedal on the symptomps of prementrual
syndrome. Current Ther Res. 2002;63:344353.
[15] Gerhardsen G, Hansen AV, Killi M, et al. The efficacy of Femal in
women with premenstrual syndrome: a randomised, double-blind,
parallel-group, placebo-controlled, multicentre study. Adv Ther. 2008;
25:595607.
[16] Winther K, Rein E, Hedman C. S
er
elys, a herbal remedy made from
pollen extracts, reduces hot flushes and improves quality of life in
menopausal women: a randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel study.
Climacteric. 2005;8:162170.
[17] Elia D, Mares P. Assessment of the tolerance and effectiveness of the
food supplement S
er
elys
V
R
for menopausal women. Genesis. 2008;135:
1215.
[18] Druckmann R. Non-hormonal treatment of vasomotor symptoms in
female patients with and after breast carcinoma. Maturitas. 2015;81:
160.
[19] Freeman EW, Ensrud KE, Larson JC, et al. Placebo improvement in
pharmacologic treatment of menopausal hot flashes: time course, dur-
ation, and predictors. Psychosom Med. 2015;77:167175.
[20] Seeger H, Ruan X, Neubauer H, et al. Membrane-initiated effects of
Serelys
V
R
on proliferation and apoptosis of human breast cancer cells.
Gynecol Endocrinol. 2017;27:14.
4 T. FAIT ET AL.
... In literature, it is shown that PureCyTonin is effective in the treatment of vasomotor symptoms, however most of the data come from studies performed in healthy women [17][18][19]. In the double-blind, placebo-controlled trial by Winther et al. no evidence of abnormal uterine bleeding or change in circulating sex hormone levels was observed before and after the study period, confirming no estrogenic activity [17]. ...
... Among the different alternative options for BCS, PureCytonin can be promising [5,10]. The efficacy of PureCyTonin has been shown in healthy women in different clinical trials [17][18][19], demonstrating a significant decrease in HF, insomnia, depression, irritability, and fatigue after 3 months of treatment, without side effects. ...
... Already Fait et al. in 2019 performing a prospective, open, observational, and multicenter study in 104 menopausal healthy women, demonstrated, through MRS score, a significant decrease in HF and improvement in sleep disturbances, depression, and fatigue after 12 weeks [19]. In our population the total MRS score was significantly better in PureCyTonin after 1 month. ...
Article
Full-text available
Objective evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of PureCyTonin against hot flashes (HF) in breast cancer survivors (BCS). Methods a prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial was conducted in Italy. Interventions administration of PureCyTonin or placebo, for 3 months. Effectiveness was investigated through the compilation of a daily diary for HF and of validated questionnaires (Menopause Rating Scale (MRS), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Visual Analogical Scales (VAS) for HF, sweating, irritability, fatigue, sleep, quality of life), carried out before starting the treatment (T0), after 1 month (T1) and after 3 months (T2). Any side effects and HF diary were recorded at each visit. Results 19 women were randomized to receive PureCyTonin and 20 to placebo. At T2 compared to T0, in the PureCyTonin group, we found a reduction in the number of HF (p = 0.02) measured by daily diary. An improvement in the subjective perception of women regarding HF intensity (p = 0.04), sweat nuisance (p = 0.02), irritability (p = 0.03) and fatigue (p = 0.04) was observed through VAS scale measurement at T2 compared to T0.The total MRS score was significantly better in the PureCyTonin group at T1 (p = 0.03) compared to T0. Conclusions PureCyTonin significantly reduces HF number after 3 months of therapy in BCS and it is well-tolerated.
... The quality of the identified studies ranged from 1 to 5, and the most common MMAT score was 2, which is indicative of a low methodological quality. A total of 3 studies recruited perimenopausal women, 68,76,82 18 recruited menopausal women 25,28,31,[34][35][36]38,44,[46][47][48]51,55,58,63,65,66,77 and a total of 24 primarily recruited postmenopausal women. 27,29,32,[41][42][43]50,52,53,56,57,59,61,62,64,[69][70][71][72][73]75,78,79,83 Fourteen studies recruited women from multiple groups. ...
... 53,64 Overall, a total of 37 studies reported that the nutritional intervention improved some aspect of sleep, 25,[28][29][30][32][33][34][35][36][38][39][40][41]43,44,[46][47][48]50,51,53,54,[56][57][58]61,63,64,67,69,[72][73][74][75][76][77][78] and a total of 22 studies observed no benefit upon sleep, or sleepiness. 26,27,31,37,42,45,49,52,55,59,60,62,65,66,68,70,71,[79][80][81][82][83] Of the 37 studies that showed a positive effect upon sleep, this included a total of 18 studies where improvements were observed using a menopause symptom questionnaire, such as the Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS), Menopause Rating Scale (MRS), or Kupperman Index (KI), which assessed some element of sleep such as the presence or absence of sleep disorders. 28,29,34,36,39,40,43,58,61,63,65,67,[72][73][74]76,78,82 These 37 studies also included a total of 10 studies in which a benefit upon subjective sleep quality was observed, as measured using a validated and commonly used measure of sleep quality (PSQI). ...
... [25][26][27]30,31,34,36,41,44,52,53,56,59,64,68,72,[75][76][77][79][80][81][82] The lack of preregistration is problematic, as the preregistration of clinical trials is necessary to ensure transparency, and to also minimize the impact of, or prevent, publication bias and the selective reporting of results upon trial completion. 87 In some studies, full details regarding the dosage, contents, or the frequency of usage of each intervention was not stated, 33,41,48,[65][66][67] which is likely to hinder replication studies. ...
Article
Full-text available
Context Sleep disturbances are a core symptom of menopause, which refers to the permanent cessation of menstrual periods. Nutritional interventions may alleviate menopause-related sleep disturbances, as studies have shown that certain interventions (eg, tart cherry juice, or tryptophan-rich foods) can improve relevant aspects of sleep. Objective The aim of this systematic review was to examine the effect of nutritional interventions for menopause-related sleep disturbances, in order to inform the subsequent development of specific interventional trials and assess their potential as a treatment for menopause-related sleep disturbances. Data Sources Published studies in English were located by searching PubMed and PsycArticles databases (until September 15, 2022). Data Extraction Following full-text review, a final total of 59 articles were included. The search protocol was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Data Analysis A total of 37 studies reported that a nutritional intervention improved some aspect of sleep, and 22 studies observed no benefit. Most (n = 24) studies recruited postmenopausal women, 18 recruited menopausal women, 3 recruited perimenopausal women, and 14 recruited women from multiple groups. The majority of the studies were of low methodological quality. Due to the heterogeneity of the studies, a narrative synthesis without meta-analysis is reported. Conclusion Despite the large heterogeneity in the studies and choice of intervention, the majority of the identified studies reported that a nutritional intervention did benefit sleep, and that it is mainly subjective sleep that is improved. More high-quality, adequately powered, randomized controlled trials of the identified nutritional interventions are necessary. Systematic Review Registration PROSPERO registration no. CRD42021262367.
... 15 This specific pollen extract contains defined pollen monocultures from rye (Secale cereal), scots pine (Pinus sylvestris), cock's foot (Dactylis glomerata), and maize (Zea mays). 16 Regarding the mechanism of action, a study showed that PureCyTonin ® inhibited the reuptake of [³H]-serotonin into rat cortical synaptosomes in a dose-dependent manner, similar to the mechanism of action of SSRIs. 17 However, the main difference from SSRIs is that this natural product did not demonstrate interference with CYP2D6, therefore eliminating the possibility of drug interaction with tamoxifen. ...
... No undesirable side effects are reported in this study. 16 These results are consistent with the clinical findings of previous RCT including 54 subjects comparing similar products of PCP extract containing PI82 and GC Fem (Femal ® ) 320 mg once daily in the morning with placebo. The results showed that 65% of subjects taking Femal ® responded with a reduction in hot flushes compared with 38% in the placebo group (p<0.006). ...
Article
Full-text available
During the menopause transition, several symptoms such as muscle and joint pain, back pain, vasomotor symptoms, urogenital symptoms, and psychological disorders may occur due to declining estrogen levels. Approximately a third of women would experience severe symptoms with a need for treatment. Currently, menopausal hormonal therapy (MHT) is still considered to be the first-line therapy despite its risk of cancer. Other options, such as pharmacotherapy or herbal formulas, have their limitation, urging the need for an effective and safe treatment. Standardized purified cytoplasmic pollen (PCP) extract, otherwise known as PureCyTonin® is a novel, non-hormonal, non-phytoestrogenic option that is proven to be effective in reducing menopausal symptoms while being neutral to the proliferation and apoptosis of breast cancer cells. Recent evidence shows promising results of PureCyTonin® for menopausal symptoms treatment.
... Purified cytoplasm of pollen (PCP) is a non-hormonal nutraceutical with inhibitory action on serotonin reuptake [3], whose efficacy and safety in treating postmenopause VMS has been assessed in several studies [4,5]. The aims of this review are: (1) to review the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and clinical features of VMS in patients with BC as well as the state of the art of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) approaches in relieving these symptoms; (2) to review the effectiveness of PCP based on available literature and the authors' clinical experience. ...
... A prospective, open, observational, multicenter study in 104 menopausal women assessed the effectiveness of PCP over 3 months on menopausal symptoms by the Menopausal Rating Scale (MRS) [5]. After 3 months of treatment, HFs, sleep disturbance, depressive mood, irritability, and fatigue were reduced by about half. ...
Article
Full-text available
Objective Effective management of vasomotor symptoms (VMS) in patients undergoing treatment for breast cancer (BC) represents a critical but frequent unmet need. This review summarizes the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and clinical features of VMS in patients with BC and provides a synopsis of the complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) approaches in relieving VMS with a focus on purified cytoplasm of pollen (PCP). Methods The literature on VMS epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical burden, and CAM treatment in healthy women and patients with BC was reviewed. Results VMS are common in patients with BC undergoing hormonal treatment and negatively impact quality of life, leading to treatment discontinuation in up to 25% of patients with detrimental impact on risk of BC recurrence and overall survival. CAM approaches to treat VMS in patients with BC include vitamin E, phytoestrogens, and black cohosh, even if there is a lack of solid evidence to guide clinicians in the choice of treatment. PCP, obtained according to standards of good manufacturing practice, has a definite pharmacological mechanism of action, is devoid of estrogen activity, and has shown clinical efficacy on menopause-associated symptoms with a favorable safety profile and high compliance. As such, it appears to represent a valid management option to improve quality of life in patients with pre- and postmenopausal BC. Conclusions Physicians should actively investigate the presence and impact of VMS in patients receiving therapy for BC. Additional and appropriately sized randomized clinical trials are needed to provide clear evidence on how to best meet the needs of patients with BC suffering from menopause-associated symptoms.
... It also improves other HRQoL parameters. The recommended dose is 160 mg/day for the first two months, followed by 80 mg/day[94][95][96]. ...
... The cultivation, harvesting, and extraction process of PCP excludes any use of pesticides and pollen allergens, making it theoretically safe for use. 5 Consistent with previous findings, studies included in this review found little to no adverse effects from taking PCP. 5,21,33 Three of the studies reported no adverse effects; one study reported obstipation and mild skin rashes, one participant with a migraine, and two participants with mild nausea, but reported nausea to be most likely due to the concurrent use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. The final study did not report a record of adverse effects (Table 1). ...
Article
Importance Menopause impacts the quality of life for women, with symptoms varying from hot flashes to night disturbances. When menopausal hormonal therapy is contraindicated or women refuse menopausal hormonal therapy, many consider alternatives such as pollen extract for treating vasomotor symptoms. Objective This meta-analysis focuses on the impact of using purified pollen extract as a treatment option to reduce vasomotor symptoms in women, specifically focusing on symptoms such as hot flashes, night disturbances, myalgias, and depression. Evidence Review A comprehensive literature search was conducted using the following Boolean search string “women OR females” AND “purified pollen OR pollen extract OR cytoplasmic pollen OR Bonafide OR Femal OR Estroven OR Serelys” AND “menopausal symptoms OR vasomotor symptoms OR hot flashes OR night sweats OR sleep disturbance.” Publications in English from 2003 to the present were included. To assess the risk of bias, authors used the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias 2 for a randomized controlled trial and Risk-of-Bias in Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) for observational studies. Using ReviewManager, a Der Simonian–Laird random-effects model meta-analysis was conducted to determine the standardized mean differences (SMDs) in the outcomes for each study. Findings Five articles were retained: one randomized controlled trial and four observational studies ( N = 420). An overall decrease in scores from the baseline of studies compared with a 3-month follow-up after purified cytoplasm of pollen (PCP) treatment was recognized when compiling the data. Overall, there was significant improvement across all outcomes at 3 months: hot flashes demonstrated an overall improvement in SMD of −1.66 ( P < 0.00001), night disturbance scores were improved with an SMD of −1.10 ( P < 0.0001), depression scores were improved with an SMD of −1.31 ( P < 0.0001), and myalgia had an improvement in SMD of −0.40 ( P < 0.00001). When controlled studies were pooled for meta-analysis, outcomes, however, were no longer statistically significant. Conclusions and Relevance Evaluating the risk-to-benefit ratio of alternative therapies, such as PCP extract, is important to care for women who cannot take traditional vasomotor symptom therapies. Pooled data from controlled studies evaluating PCP extract suggest that vasomotor symptom improvements seen in noncontrolled studies may have been due to the placebo effect; however, its use was not associated with significant adverse effects.
... Fait et al. 20 diseñaron en 2009 un estudio prospectivo, abierto, observacional y multicéntrico, con 104 mujeres en la menopausia, en el cual las pacientes recibían durante 3 meses EPP, y registraron una significativa reducción del 48.5% en los sofocos. ...
Article
Full-text available
Los síntomas vasomotores (SVM) se encuentran entre los síntomas más comunes de la transición a la menopausia. Más del 70% de las mujeres de mediana edad informan SVM en algún momento durante la transición a la menopausia, y para un tercio de las mujeres los SVM son muy frecuentes o graves. Muchas mujeres recurren a terapias naturales para tratar los SVM. Esta revisión se centra en una de esas opciones naturales: el extracto purificado de polen (Serelys®). Se realizó una búsqueda e identificación de artículos publicados hasta octubre de 2022 recopilados de sistemas de búsqueda electrónicos, como Google Scholar, MEDLINE, PubMed y Scopus. Las palabras de búsqueda fueron “Vasomotor symptoms”, “menopause” AND “pollen”. Los estudios preclínicos señalan un mecanismo de acción en su implicación sobre el sistema serotoninérgico, así como su unión a los receptores de dopamina. Los estudios clínicos demuestran la seguridad y el efecto positivo sobre los SVM. Palabras clave: Síntomas vasomotores. Menopausia. Polen. Vasomotor symptoms (VMS) are among the most common symptoms of the menopausal transition. More than 70% of middle-aged women report VMS at some point during the menopausal transition, and for a third of women, VMS is very common or severe. Many women turn to natural therapies to treat VMS. This review focuses on one such natural option, purified pollen extract (Serelys®). The information available until October 2022 was collected via the library and electronic search systems such as Google Scholar, MEDLINE, PubMed, and Scopus. The search words were: “Vasomotor symptoms”, “menopause” AND “pollen”. Preclinical studies point to a mechanism of action in its involvement in the serotonergic system, as well as its binding to dopamine receptors. Clinical studies demonstrate the safety and positive effect on VMS. Keywords: Vasomotor symptoms. Menopause. Pollen.
Article
Full-text available
Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) is a treatment for acute climacteric syndrome, with the best effectivity. It also prevents bone loss and fractures. Ischemic heart disease prevention and cognitive function improvement have been observed with HRT, only when started early (critical window hypothesis). There is a large scale of complementary and alternative medicines for women in preference to non-hormonal treatment. Unfortunately, they do not always accompany reliable documentation of efficacy and safety from well-performed studies.
Article
Full-text available
The International Menopause Society (IMS) has produced these new 2016 recommendations on women's midlife health and menopause hormone therapy (MHT) to help guide health-care professionals in optimizing their management of women in the menopause transition and beyond. The term MHT has been used to cover therapies including estrogens, progestogens and combined regimens. For the first time, the 2016 IMS recommendations now include grades of recommendations, levels of evidence and 'good practice points', in addition to section-specific references. Where possible, the recommendations are based on and linked to the evidence that supports them, unless good-quality evidence is absent. Particular attention has been paid to published evidence from 2013 onwards, the last time the IMS recommendations were updated. Databases have been extensively searched for relevant publications using key terms specific to each specialist area within menopause physiology and medicine. Information has also been drawn from international consensus statements published by bodies such as the IMS, the European Menopause and Andropause Society and the North American Menopause Society. The recommendations have been produced by experts derived mainly from the IMS, with the assistance of key collaborators where deemed advantageous. In preparing these international recommendations, experts have taken into account geographical variations in medical care, prevalence of diseases, and country-specific attitudes of the public, medical community and health authorities towards menopause management. The variation in availability and licensing of MHT and other products has also been considered.
Article
Full-text available
Around 14.5 million peri- and postmenopausal women currently live in Germany. Moreover, approximately 450 000 women, each with a life expectancy of around 85 years, reach menopause every year in Germany. The challenge is therefore to find a therapy with few side effects which could improve the quality of life of women with menopausal symptoms. The aim of hormone therapy (HT) is to remedy hormone deficiencies using substances that offer the best trade-off between benefits and risks. This is where progesterone has a new and important role to play. Progesterone is one of the most important gestagens. Biologically effective progesterone formulations created with micronization techniques have been used in clinical practice since 1996. Nevertheless, up until 2003 preference was given to synthetic gestagens rather than progesterone. The increased breast cancer hazard ratio of 1.23 reported in the WHI study and of 2 given in the Million Women Study has been associated with the use of synthetic gestagens. In a comparison between synthetic gestagens and progesterone, the E3N Study showed that the transdermal administration of estrogen and progesterone did not lead to an increase in breast cancer rates (RR: 1.08). The administration of progesterone does not change the HDL/LDL cholesterol ratio. Because of its anti-mineralocorticoid effect, progesterone has no impact on carbohydrate metabolism, hemostasis, blood pressure, thrombogenicity and body weight. The administration of 200 mg/day progesterone over 12 days of a menstrual cycle or a daily administration of 100 mg combined with an estrogen are a safe and well-tolerated option to treat menopausal symptoms, with a better benefit risk profile compared to synthetic gestagens.
Article
Herbal extracts used for the alleviation of postmenopausal symptoms might have a lower risk of breast cancer development than hormone therapy. Serelys® is a product composed of purified pollen cytoplasm extracts. Recent experimental data revealed that estrogens might trigger a further proliferative effect on breast cancer cells via the progesterone receptor membrane component-1 (PGRMC1) in addition to the proliferative effect via intracellularly located receptors. MCF-7 and T47D cells were stably transfected with PGRMC1. Different concentrations of the extract alone and in combination with fixed concentrations of estradiol or a growth factor mixture were tested. Proliferation of treated cells was determined by the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl) 2,5-diphenyl-tetrazolium bromide (MTT)-test and apoptosis was determined using a Cell Death Detection ELISA kit (CDD). Serelys® was neutral in the cell lines transfected or not transfected with PGRMC1. It was also neutral in combination with estradiol or growth factors in terms of cell proliferation and cell apoptosis. Thus in contrast to hormone therapy Serelys® appears to trigger no further breast cancer risk when applied in the post menopause to women, who do or do not overexpress PGRMC1. Overall Serelys® may be an effective alternative for alleviating postmenopausal symptoms without increasing breast cancer risk.
Article
CONTEXT: Despite decades of accumulated observational evidence, the balance of risks and benefits for hormone use in healthy postmenopausal women remains uncertain. OBJECTIVE: To assess the major health benefits and risks of the most commonly used combined hormone preparation in the United States. DESIGN: Estrogen plus progestin component of the Women's Health Initiative, a randomized controlled primary prevention trial (planned duration, 8.5 years) in which 16608 postmenopausal women aged 50-79 years with an intact uterus at baseline were recruited by 40 US clinical centers in 1993-1998. INTERVENTIONS: Participants received conjugated equine estrogens, 0.625 mg/d, plus medroxyprogesterone acetate, 2.5 mg/d, in 1 tablet (n = 8506) or placebo (n = 8102). MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: The primary outcome was coronary heart disease (CHD) (nonfatal myocardial infarction and CHD death), with invasive breast cancer as the primary adverse outcome. A global index summarizing the balance of risks and benefits included the 2 primary outcomes plus stroke, pulmonary embolism (PE), endometrial cancer, colorectal cancer, hip fracture, and death due to other causes. RESULTS: On May 31, 2002, after a mean of 5.2 years of follow-up, the data and safety monitoring board recommended stopping the trial of estrogen plus progestin vs placebo because the test statistic for invasive breast cancer exceeded the stopping boundary for this adverse effect and the global index statistic supported risks exceeding benefits. This report includes data on the major clinical outcomes through April 30, 2002. Estimated hazard ratios (HRs) (nominal 95% confidence intervals [CIs]) were as follows: CHD, 1.29 (1.02-1.63) with 286 cases; breast cancer, 1.26 (1.00-1.59) with 290 cases; stroke, 1.41 (1.07-1.85) with 212 cases; PE, 2.13 (1.39-3.25) with 101 cases; colorectal cancer, 0.63 (0.43-0.92) with 112 cases; endometrial cancer, 0.83 (0.47-1.47) with 47 cases; hip fracture, 0.66 (0.45-0.98) with 106 cases; and death due to other causes, 0.92 (0.74-1.14) with 331 cases. Corresponding HRs (nominal 95% CIs) for composite outcomes were 1.22 (1.09-1.36) for total cardiovascular disease (arterial and venous disease), 1.03 (0.90-1.17) for total cancer, 0.76 (0.69-0.85) for combined fractures, 0.98 (0.82-1.18) for total mortality, and 1.15 (1.03-1.28) for the global index. Absolute excess risks per 10 000 person-years attributable to estrogen plus progestin were 7 more CHD events, 8 more strokes, 8 more PEs, and 8 more invasive breast cancers, while absolute risk reductions per 10 000 person-years were 6 fewer colorectal cancers and 5 fewer hip fractures. The absolute excess risk of events included in the global index was 19 per 10 000 person-years. CONCLUSIONS: Overall health risks exceeded benefits from use of combined estrogen plus progestin for an average 5.2-year follow-up among healthy postmenopausal US women. All-cause mortality was not affected during the trial. The risk-benefit profile found in this trial is not consistent with the requirements for a viable intervention for primary prevention of chronic diseases, and the results indicate that this regimen should not be initiated or continued for primary prevention of CHD.
Article
Tamoxifen, used for treatment and chemoprevention of breast cancer, is converted to 4-hydroxy-tamoxifen and other metabolites by cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes. It can often initiate or exacerbate vasomotor symptoms (VMS). Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) have been prescribed for VMS in such participants in which estrogens are contraindicated. However, SSRIs are strong CYP2D6 inhibitors and can reduce the efficacy of tamoxifen. A nonhormonal purified Swedish pollen extract (Relizen is also prescribed in other countries under different registered trade names: Sérélys, Femal, Femalen), has shown efficacy versus placebo in treating VMS in a randomized, double-blind controlled trial. The objective of this study was to evaluate the in vitro effects of purified Swedish pollen extract on the CYP2D6 enzyme. PE-F/S, the powder form of purified Swedish pollen extract, contains 75% pollen/pistil extract P182 and 25% pollen extract GCFem. It was tested for its potential to inhibit the human CYP isoenzyme, CYP2D6, in pooled human liver microsomes. Quinidine, a known inhibitor of CYP2D6, was used as a reference. Concentrations of purified Swedish pollen extract ranged from 1.65 to 400 μg/mL, approximately five times the recommended daily dose for VMS. Inhibition of CYP2D6 with purified Swedish pollen extract was negligible at all concentrations and ranged from -6.53% to 10.67%. Inhibition of CYP2D6 enzyme with Quinidine increased in a linear dose-related fashion from -7.07% at 2.06 nM to 84.05% at 500 nM. Purified Swedish pollen extract is a nonhormonal treatment of VMS that does not show inhibition of the CYP2D6 enzyme. This may have important clinical utility for women using tamoxifen for breast cancer treatment or chemoprevention who experience VMS.
Article
To characterize the time course, duration of improvement, and clinical predictors of placebo response in treatment of menopausal hot flashes. Data were pooled from two trials conducted in the Menopausal Strategies: Finding Lasting Answers to Symptoms and Health network, providing a combined placebo group (n = 247) and a combined active treatment group (n = 297). Participants recorded hot flash frequency in diaries twice daily during treatment (Weeks 0-8) and subsequent follow-up (Weeks 9-11). The primary outcome variable was clinically significant improvement, defined as a 50% or greater decrease in hot flash frequency from baseline and calculated for each week in the study. Subgroups were defined a priori using standard clinical definitions for significant improvement and partial improvement. Clinical and demographic characteristics of the participants were evaluated as predictors of improvement. Clinically significant improvement with placebo accrued each treatment week, with 33% significantly improved at Week 8. Of placebo responders who were improved at both Weeks 4 and 8, 77% remained clinically improved at Week 11 after treatment ended. Independent predictors of significant placebo improvement in the final multivariable model were African American race (odds ratio [OR] = 5.61, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.41-13.07, p < .001), current smokers (OR = 2.30, 95% CI = 1.05-5.06, p = .038), and hot flash severity in screening (OR = 1.45, 95% CI = 1.00-2.10, p = .047). Clinically significant improvement with placebo accrued throughout treatment with a time course similar to improvement with active drug. A meaningful number of participants in the placebo group sustained a clinically significant response after stopping placebo pills. The results suggest that nonspecific effects are important components of treatment and warrant further studies to optimize their contributions in clinical care.
Article
An FDA advisory committee recommended against approving paroxetine for menopausal vasomotor symptoms. But recognizing the lack of hormone-free products for this indication, and after reviewing the drug's efficacy and safety, the FDA decided it can benefit some women. The recent approval by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) of paroxetine (Brisdelle, Noven) for the treatment of moderate-to-severe vasomotor symptoms associated with menopause was distinctive for at least two reasons. First, it offered the first nonhormonal option to women who cannot or do not want to use hormonal medications to treat their menopausal vasomotor symptoms. Second, the approval ran counter to the recommendation of the FDA Reproductive Health Drugs Advisory Committee, which had concluded, by a vote of 10 to 4, that the overall benefit-risk profile of Brisdelle did not support approval. The FDA always carefully considers the advice ...