Change and Globalization
“Change” is in the air. The recent campaign to elect Barack Obama President of the United States was explicitly about change-- big changes, not only in who can hold that most powerful position in the world, but in new ways of influencing voters and in governing, new political values, and new directions for U.S. domestic and foreign policy.
The emphasis of this concluding chapter, as throughout the book, is also on change—changing community social norms and professional practices. That is not uncommon for community psychology (CP) texts. Even more perhaps than other books in the field, however, the emphasis in this volume, and especially in this chapter, is also on encouraging students to critically analyze the political goals, interests, and actors that not only resist change, but also those that want to make changes.
There may be no one better prepared to speak to both global and local political influences on communities and the transdisciplinary promise of CP than the author, Maritza Montero. She is a trained sociologist who has taught and written about CP for most of the field’s existence and was President of the International Society of Political Psychology. Yet what gives Prof. Montero practical, real-world expertise on community and political change is that she is Venezuelan and has closely observed and participated in the fast and massive government and social changes that have occurred in that country.
The most important contribution of Montero’s chapter may be to point to the wealth of Latin American ideas and liberating practices that have influenced CP globally. Just four years ago, J.R. Newbrough (to whom I am professionally, intellectually, and personally indebted) ended his commentary in this space by positing the need for public conversations about some important international challenges and he concluded that “CP as a profession is not ready either to initiate the conversation or to participate effectively in the conversation” (p. 501). That may accurately reflect the international ignorance of most community psychologists in the U.S. at that time, but probably understated the development of CP around the globe. And the field is already more international than it was just a few years ago, as evidenced by the recent volume by Reich, Riemer, Prilleltensky, and Montero (2007), international, continental and regional CP conferences around the globe, and new special journal issues on international CP that are currently in press in the American Journal of Community Psychology and the Journal of Prevention and Intervention in the Community. This globalization of the field is a very healthy sign and a necessary movement if CP is to survive and grow.
Critical Community Psychology: Living Up to the Promise
Montero and other contributors to this volume are strong proponents of critical/liberation psychology, an orientation which should perhaps be adopted more broadly and deeply by community psychologists. It fits well with the older ecological and newer transdisciplinary direction of the field as it requires community psychologists to understand social theory, how local, national and global political and economic structures influence local problems and solutions, and the importance of cultural sensitivity and social institutions (Maton, Perkins & Saegert, 2006). But critical/liberation psychology, like critical studies in general, has been around, particularly in Latin America and among a small number of U.S. and European psychologists, for several decades and there is little clear evidence of its widespread adherence or having any substantial influence on theory development, let alone research or community practice or policy. As Montero, Prilleltensky, Nelson and others have argued, community psychologists should be encouraged to think more critically about, and to reveal, the political and economic bases of problems. We should also be more practical, however, and address those structural problems through policy change at all levels.