ArticlePDF Available

Do Japanese show the “neutral response style” on Likert scales?

September 2011
The Proceedings of the Annual Convention of the Japanese Psychological Association 75:3PM065-3PM065

DOI:10.4992/pacjpa.75.0_3PM065

Authors:

Yohtaro Takano

The University of Tokyo

David Matsumoto

San Francisco State University

Midori Toyama

Gakushuin University

Show all 5 authorsHide

ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.

ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any references for this publication.

Article

Full-text available

Developing and Improving Rating Scales for a Task-based Writing Performance test

October 2009 · JLTA Journal Kiyo

Yoshihito SUGITA

This research describes a part of the development process of a task-based writing performance assessment for Japanese learners of English. In the previous study, two assessment tasks to elicit the underlying constructs and rating scales were developed. The pre-testing was conducted on the participants comprised of 15 university students and five experienced teacher raters, who provided scores for ... [Show full abstract] two sets of 15 texts. The correlational analysis showed that the teacher raters could produce relatively high scores with each rating scale The results of FACETS analysis, however, suggested that rating scales for task 1 (accuracy) and 2 (communicability) should be recommended to be optimized. In this research, we explored how rating scales can be developed and improved based on the, results of the pre-testing. First, we optimized the rating scales on the basis of the criteria that Linacre (2002) proposed. Then, the scoring guide was revised in each section. As a result, the new rating scales are comprised of clearer descriptions of each construct and of 5-point Likert scales. The descriptors of each category are also provided with written samples as an explanatory part of the scale in order to give raters a shared understanding of the constructs and to make them more self-consistent in scoring.

View full-text

Article

Full-text available

Evaluation of Politeness: Do the Japanese Evaluate Attentiveness More Positively than the British?

January 2010 · Pragmatics Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA)

Saeko Fukushima

This study investigates evaluation of attentiveness by British and Japanese university students. Attentiveness ( kikubari ) (defined as a demonstrator’s preemptive response to a beneficiary’s verbal/non-verbal cues or situations) is demonstrated without being requested and it is one of the important politeness strategies. A questionnaire including six attentiveness situations was distributed to ... [Show full abstract] 74 British and 138 Japanese participants, who were asked to evaluate the attentiveness situations on a five-point Likert scale and to state the reasons for their evaluation. The Likert-scale evaluations were analyzed using a three-way ANOVA and subsequently, the reasons for evaluations were analyzed qualitatively. It was anticipated that the Japanese would evaluate attentiveness more positively than the British, as attentiveness has been important in Japanese culture. The results, however, did not necessarily confirm this. That is, there were significant differences between British and Japanese participants in four situations, the British participants having evaluated attentiveness more positively than the Japanese participants in two situations and the reverse being the case in two other situations.

View full-text

Article

Full-text available

The Nature of Authenticity in English as a Foreign Language: A Comparison of Eight Inter-related Def...

December 2016

Richard S. Pinner

This paper aims to gain a better understanding of the concept of authenticity by asking language teachers and students to what extent they agree with eight inter-related definitions (Gilmore, 2007). The eight definitions were converted into a questionnaire survey with both Likert scale items and open-ended questions, further triangulated by teacher/researcher journals and observation data. The ... [Show full abstract] questionnaire was administered to Japanese university students (both English and non-English majors) and Japanese high school English teachers. This study aims to find out what authenticity means to two of the main stakeholders in English as a foreign language contexts; namely, students and teachers for whom English is a foreign language. The results show that none of the definitions are satisfactory on their own, and there was little or no overall consensus about the definitions. This finding serves to prove that authenticity is in need of an updated understanding which is more inclusive to speakers of English as a second or foreign language.

View full-text

Article

Individual and Cultural Differences On Status DifferentiationThe Status Differentiation Scale

July 2007 · Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology

David Matsumoto

The concept of status differentiation is introduced along with a description of the development and initial validation of an individual-difference measure called the Status Differentiation Scale (SDS). This is followed by reports of cross-cultural differences on the SDS in three countries. Study 1 used American participants and established the scoring procedure for the SDS, its internal ... [Show full abstract] reliability and structural relationships, and construct validity. Study 2 used American and Japanese participants and demonstrated its internal reliability, structural relationships, and construct validity with a measure of allocentrism in both countries and predictable country differences that could not be accounted for by collectivism. Study 3 used American and South Korean participants and documented its internal reliability, structural relationships, and construct validity with a measure of values in both countries and predictable country differences that could not be accounted for by values. The concept of status differentiation, and the availability of the SDS, can have important theoretical and empirical ramifications for future studies of culture.

Article

Emotion judgments do not differ as a function of perceived nationality

June 2007 · International Journal of Psychology

David Matsumoto

This article reports three studies concerning the relationship between emotion judgments and perceived nationality of the expressors being judged. Study 1 demonstrated that observers do not reliably make implicit assumptions about the nationalities of the expressors in judgment tasks. Study 2 examined judgments of Americans and Japanese observers who were told that Caucasian and Asian expressors ... [Show full abstract] were Americans and Japanese, respectively, and who made fixed-choice judgments and intensity ratings. Study 3 examined judgments of Americans given similar instructions and who used a multiscalar rating task. Neither Studies 2 nor 3 provided evidence that nationality information affected judgments. These findings have implications not only for basic emotion theory, but also for international and intercultural communication training.

Article

American-Japanese Cultural Differences in the Recognition of Universal Facial Expressions

March 1992 · Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology

David Matsumoto

Although the universal recognition of facial expressions of emotion is well documented, few studies have examined how cultures differ in the degree to which they perceive the universal emotions accurately. In this study, American and Japanese judges viewed expressions of six universal emotions posed by both Caucasian and Japanese males and females. In addition, all photos met external criteria ... [Show full abstract] for validly and reliably portraying the emotions. Subjects judged which emotions were portrayed and how intensely they were expressed. Results indicated substantial and consistent differences according to the culture of the judges and the emotion portrayed. These findings are discussed in terms of stable cultural dimensions that may influence the perception of emotion.

Article

Time to rethink the common view

August 2018 · Asian Journal of Social Psychology

David Matsumoto

Y. Takano and E. Osaka (2018, this issue) provide strong and irrefutable empirical evidence that the “common view”—that Japanese are typically collectivists whereas Americans are typically individualists—is not supported by data. Given other reviews in the past that have led to the same conclusion, in this commentary, I argue that now is the time for the field to take stock and reconsider this ... [Show full abstract] common view. This commentary briefly describes conceptual, empirical, and practical problems concerning the common view and offers suggestions to move beyond it. By moving beyond the common view, and other similar explanations of cross‐cultural differences, cross‐cultural researchers in particular can lead the way in facilitating a further evolution of research and theory about the link between cultures and individuals.

Last Updated: 18 Mar 2025