A preview of this full-text is provided by Springer Nature.
Content available from The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology (2019) 102:2245–2263
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-03382-1
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
A novel I4.0-enabled engineering method and its evaluation
Frederick Prinz1
·Michael Schoeffler1
·Armin Lechler2
·Alexander Verl2
Received: 30 August 2018 / Accepted: 21 January 2019 / Published online: 30 January 2019
©Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019
Abstract
Recent trends show that products are becoming more complex and multi-variant. Therefore, future production systems need
to become more advanced in terms of reconfigurability, flexibility, and transformability. To achieve these advancements,
future systems must be highly changeable and support plug-and-produce approaches. The majority of today’s engineering
methods focus on static workflows based on predefined assets and setups. As a consequence, changes in the production
system come with high costs, especially during production process execution. Therefore, new engineering methods are
required which are explicitly designed for highly changeable production systems. To contribute towards fully changeable
production systems, an I4.0 framework is proposed that covers the entire engineering process. The focus is set on presenting
a graphical I4.0-enabled engineering method that enables dynamic workflows with varying assets and setups. Moreover, in
order to evaluate the method, a user study was conducted, in which participants were asked to solve multiple engineering
tasks by utilizing the presented I4.0-enabled method as well as a conventional approach. The results indicated that
the proposed I4.0-enabled engineering method significantly outperformed the conventional method in terms of required
engineering times and subjective ratings.
Keywords Industry 4.0 ·Industrial internet of things ·Changeability ·Framework ·Workflow engineering ·Business
process modeling and notation ·User study
1 Introduction
Significant impacts on current production systems are
expected by advancements related to the so-called fourth
industrial revolution, often denoted by the terms Industry
4.0 (I4.0) and Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) [1].
Industry 4.0 is a term based on an initiative of the German
government [2–4], while IIoT is an enabling technology for
Industry 4.0 [1]. IIoT is a sub-term of the more general
term Internet of Things (IoT) [5], which describes the
networking of smart components to exchange and aggregate
a huge amount of data [6,7]. IoT systems are to be found
in almost any domain, such as autonomous driving, smart
Frederick Prinz
frederick.prinz@de.bosch.com
1Corporate Sector Research and Advance Engineering,
Robert Bosch GmbH, 71272 Renningen, Germany
2Institute for Control Engineering of Machine Tools and
Manufacturing Units (ISW), University of Stuttgart,
70174 Stuttgart, Germany
cities, and industrial environments [8,9]. Moreover, they are
also referred to as cyber-physical systems (CPS) [10,11].
Respectively, cyber-physical production systems (CPPS)
refer to systems that focus on industrial applications [12].
Both I4.0 and IIoT share a similar vision of future CPPS
[1]. One aspect of this vision is to cope the new challenges
related to product versatility and market volatility [13]. In
particular, future production systems are expected to be
more advanced in terms of “mass customization” [14–16].
Mass customization targets at low costs per product unit
combined with a maximum of flexibility for individual
customization. Moreover, the overall changeability of
future production systems is presumed to be significantly
increased which will, e. g., further reduce ramp-up times for
new products [17–19]. Assets of future production systems
(such as sensors, devices, machines, or stations) can be
rearranged for new products during runtime or at least
within short retooling time frames.
Unfortunately, the majority of today’s engineering
methods do not support such a high degree of changeability.
These engineering methods rely on static arrangements with
predefined assets, i. e., assets including their input/output
signals must be preconfigured within the engineering
method. Moreover, assets cannot be added or removed from
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.