Social Dynamics of Ebola Virus Disease: A Case of Bundibugyo District, Uganda

Article (PDF Available)inHealth 11(01):108-128 · January 2019with 64 Reads
DOI: 10.4236/health.2019.111011
Cite this publication
Health, 2019, 11, 108-128
http://www.scirp.org/journal/health
ISSN Online: 1949-5005
ISSN Print: 1949-4998
DOI:
10.4236/health.2019.111011 Jan. 30, 2019 108 Health
Social Dynamics of Ebola Virus Disease: A Case
of Bundibugyo District, Uganda
Clovice Kankya1,2*#, Daisy Nabadda1,2#, Consolata Kabonesa2, Luke Nyakarahuka1,
James Muleme1, Samuel Okware3, Richard Asaba2
1Department of Biosecurity, Ecosystems and Veterinary Public Health, College of Veterinary Medicine,
Animal Resources and Biosecurity (COVAB), Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda
2Department of Gender, School of Women and Gender Studies, College of Humanities and Social Sciences (CHUSS),
Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda
3Uganda National Health Research Organization, Entebbe, Uganda
Abstract
Background:
Ebola Virus Disease (EVD) presents with a high global mortal-
ity and is known to be a highly infectious disease with devastating and gen-
dered effects on the social fabric, yet most of the science has focused on the
disease’s biology. However, little has be
en documented with regard to the
gender and social aspects of Ebola Virus Disease (EVD) in two
sub counties
(Kikyo and Bundibugyo Town Council) in Bundibugyo District
in Western
Uganda. The study was set to examine the gender differences in the level of
knowledge, attitudes and perceptions about EVD.
Methods:
The study em-
ployed a cross-
sectional design using both quantitative and qualitative data
collection methods. A structured questionnaire was administered to 254 re-
spondents, 50% of whom were women. Simp
le random sampling was used to
select the participants. Questionnaire data were analysed using SPSS at uni-
variate and bivariate levels. Qualitative methods such as key informant inter-
views (with 6 participants) and Focus Group Discussions (three, one with
men alone, another with women alone and the last one with both men and
women) were also used to collect additional information from participants.
Results:
The findings indicated that socio-demographically, the majority
(35%)
of the respondents were aged between 20 and 29 years, 53% of whom were
females. More women (about 56%) compared to men (44%) attained secon-
dary education while more men (about 51% versus 49% of the women) re-
ported that they were married. In terms of
religion, the majority of the survey
participants were Catholics (59% females and 49% males). With regard to
communities’ knowledge about EVD, there was no signifi
cant relationship
between men and women in terms of prior knowledge about EVD, risk
#Clovice Kankya and Daisy Nabadda have the same contribution to the paper.
How to cite this paper:
Kankya, C., Na-
badda, D
., Kabonesa, C., Nyakarahuka, L
.,
Muleme, J
., Okware, S. and Asaba, R.
(201
9)
Social Dynamics of Ebola Virus
Disease: A Case of Bundibugyo District,
Uganda
.
Health
,
11
, 108-128.
https://doi.org/10.4236/health.2019.111011
Received:
December 23, 2018
Accepted:
January 27, 2019
Published:
January 30, 2019
Copyright © 201
9 by author(s) and
Scientific
Research Publishing Inc.
This work
is licensed under the Creative
Commons Attribution International
License (CC BY
4.0).
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Open Access
C. Kankya et al.
DOI:
10.4236/health.2019.111011 109 Health
factors and control measures. However, slightly more males (about 51%) than
females (49%) had heard about EVD and more males (about 52%) than fe-
males (48%) admitted that they were at risk of contracting the disease. On the
control measures, slightly more females than males (about 53% vs. 47% re-
spectively) proposed avoiding contact with infected persons. The results fur-
ther revealed that more males (about 51%) than females (49%) were will
ing to
relate with EVD survivors, and this was due to the latter’s fear of con
tracting
the disease. The major devastating effects of EVD that were reported included
loss of lives, disruption of peoples movements, isolation of people, disruption
of children’s school activities, stigma and discrimination of sur
vivors. More
females
(about 52%) than males (about 48%) reported that EVD survivors
were discriminated during the EVD outbreak in Bundibugyo District.
Con-
clusions:
This study has shown that whereas both men and women demon-
strate average knowledge about EVD, there is need for m
ore training and
sensitization targeting women who have delusions about the severity of the
disease, its risk factors, stigma and the integration of survi
vors in the affected
communities. Communities also need to be sensitized about the gender roles
that increase both the burden of EVD and the risk of men and women con-
tracting the disease. This will lead to more culturally sensitive responses to
EVD outbreaks in future.
Keywords
Ebola Viral Disease (EVD), Gender, Bundibugyo District, Uganda
1. Introduction
Ebola Virus Disease (EVD) is one of the highly infectious emerging Viral
Haemorrhagic Fevers (VHFs) caused by infection with one or more of the Ebola
virus species. It was first discovered in 1976 near the Ebola River in what is now
the Democratic Republic of the Congo. A second outbreak occurred shortly af-
terwards in Nzara Town South Sudan in the Western Equatorial State. Since
then, major and minor outbreaks have occurred sporadically in Africa [1]. There
is no known treatment for EVD and case fatality rate is terribly high. Several
other deadly VHFs exist and these include: Marburg, Lassa fever, Crimean-Congo
haemorrhagic fever, and Rift Valley fever, among others. Ebola can cause disease
in humans and nonhuman primates (monkeys, gorillas, and chimpanzees). Ebola
is caused by an infection with a virus of the
Filoviridae
family and the
Ebolavirus
genus. Currently, there are five identified Ebola virus species, four of which have
caused disease in humans and these include: the Ebola virus (
Zaire
ebolavirus
),
Sudan virus (
Sudan
ebolavirus
), Taï Forest virus (
Taï
Forest
ebolavirus
, formerly
Côte d’Ivoire Ebola virus), and newly discovered [2] Bundibugyo virus (
Bun-
dibugyoebolavirus
). The fifth species is the Reston virus (
Reston
ebolavirus
)
which has had one mild case of a Zoologist in Ivory Coast but no outbreak in
nonhuman primates [3]. The Zaire and the Sudan subtypes are the most severe
C. Kankya et al.
DOI:
10.4236/health.2019.111011 110 Health
with case fatality rate between 60% and 90% on average. The Bundibugyo out-
break is less lethal with a lower case fatality rate of 34%. The time period be-
tween contracting the disease and showing symptoms after exposure ranges
from 2 to 21 days [4]. The natural reservoir host of Ebola viruses still remains
unknown.
Ebola is described by [5] as a “severe, acute viral illness”, with initial symp-
toms including a sudden onset of fever, intense weakness, muscle pain, fatigue,
headache and a sore throat, followed by vomiting, diarrhoea, rash, impaired
kidney and liver function, abdominal pain and in some cases, both internal and
external bleeding [6]. There is currently no cure for Ebola and the disease seri-
ously affects several organs in the body leading to multiple organ failure, shock
and death within days. Vital organs like the liver, kidney and the spleen are se-
verely and irreversibly damaged. EVD outbreaks principally occur in Central
and Equatorial Africa with major outbreaks in the Democratic Republic of
Congo (DRC), Gabon, Congo Brazzaville, Uganda, Gabon and South Sudan. The
worst recent outbreak occurred in West Africa between 2014 and 2015 during
which nearly 28,000 cases and nearly 11,000 deaths were reported in Sierra
Leone, Liberia and Guinea. Sporadic cases have been reported in USA, Philip-
pine, Italy (Reston) and some imported cases also reported in Europe. In 2015,
many African countries in West and central Africa were severely affected in-
cluding Liberia, Sierra Leone, Guinea, and Nigeria [7]. A total of 28,256 sus-
pected cases and 11,306 deaths in West Africa alone were recorded by the end of
the outbreak in September 2015 [8].
On the basis of evidence and the nature of similar viruses, researchers believe
that the virus is animal-borne and that bats are the most likely reservoir [9]. In
Uganda for example, a young girl who suddenly died after 3 hours of showing
the signs of EVD in Luwero District was believed to have acquired the virus
around her home since she had not left the home for the past 3 months [10]. Di-
rect contact with body fluids of Ebola patients is a major mode of transmission.
It is also believed that the virus enters the population through contact with body
fluids of non-human primates such as bats and chimpanzees through hunting of
game for food. It is also believed that bats may be the major reservoir carrying
the infection as 5% of bats without symptoms were found to be positive [2]. The
ebola virus has also been isolated in semen up to 61 days post recovery, thereby
increasing the potential through for sexual transmission. Ebola survivors often
suffer from ongoing frustrations like joint and muscle pains, chest pain and vi-
sion problems [3].
Despite its significance as a highly infectious disease, most of the science has
focused on the biology of EVD. The public health, management and care aspects
of Ebola have received relatively little attention. Yet Ebola is closely associated
and fuelled by poor socio economic weakness in society. In Africa gender dif-
ferences emerge as women often are care providers for relatives in low income
settings and in very poor sanitary conditions. On the other hand men often hunt
C. Kankya et al.
DOI:
10.4236/health.2019.111011 111 Health
game for food thereby exposing themselves and interfacing very closely with
wildlife.
The sociological and gender aspects of the disease such as community knowl-
edge, experience and impacts are only beginning to gain attention in Africa [11].
In Gulu, Uganda the majority (64%) of the 424 cases were women [11]. In Sierra
Leone for example, it has been reported that women are more affected by EVD
than men. The sex differential incidence status in this case was of 56.7% for fe-
males and 43.3% for males respectively [12]. Available evidence from West Af-
rica and Gulu Uganda further shows that Ebola disproportionately affects
women due to their care giving role that increases transmission and resultant
death. Women also bear the social burden of the disease as they play a leading
role in caring for orphans and school-going children. In addition, most of the
healthcare providers such as nurses are often women [13] [14]. This dispropor-
tionate sex differential scenario relates to the social risk factors that women face
which increase their vulnerability to EVD, largely due to their care giving roles
at household and community levels. The differentiated impact is traced to so-
cially prescribed gender norms, behaviour and the gendered division of labour
between men and women that perpetuate gender inequality [12]. In Uganda,
there is limited evidence of sociological and anthropological studies on EVD.
Thus, this study was undertaken in order to understand communities’ response
to EVD and its associated gender and social aspects in one of the areas where an
outbreak has previously occurred in 2007 and that is Bundibugyo District in
western Uganda.
Uganda has documented a total of six Ebola outbreaks since the year 2000, in-
cluding the outbreak in Bundibugyo District in 2007 [11] [15]. The Ugandan
government through the Ministry of Health mounted a national response, which
contained these outbreaks with varying degrees of success. Most of the time
EVD outbreaks were managed by the National Ebola Task Force and district
rapid response committees. They were supported international agencies led by
the WHO. The activities of the various agencies and partners were integrated
into a jointly agreed national strategy and plan [11]. The major response was ac-
tive case search and surveillance, public education and social mobilisation, isola-
tion and care. The care of post Ebola survivors and orphans was an additional
desirable activity. A laboratory centre was established at the Uganda Virus Re-
search Institute (UVRI) at Entebbe [16] for early detection and diagnosis. Early
detection and action provided the best outcome in the Luwero outbreak of 2011
[10]. This outbreak was limited to a single case fatality.
Despite the above initiatives the threat of EVD still remains due to inadequate
health systems for early detection and surveillance. Focusing on care and pre-
vention of EVD is important but it is not enough. Understanding community
perceptions of EVD, its causes and people’s knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and
myths and the gender issues there-in are key in preventing the reoccurrence of
the disease and management of the disease in Uganda and worldwide. Ethno-
graphic parameters for the local population too are critically important in order
C. Kankya et al.
DOI:
10.4236/health.2019.111011 112 Health
that local cultural practices, misperceptions and beliefs which posed challenges
to disease control and need to be addressed because they normally hinder efforts
to stop the spread of EVD [13]. In addition, understanding men and women’s
knowledge and perceptions about EVD is key aspect. The practices, myths and
beliefs could be another key in influencing health related behaviours and the
success of any public health interventions because Ebola outbreaks cannot be
predicted [17].
Thus, understanding community’s knowledge and perceptions of the disease,
fear, stigma, beliefs and practices of EVD from a gender perspective improves
prevention measures and reduces risks of the disease. Transmission and preven-
tion of Ebola is dependent on complex factors including the socio-cultural, peo-
ple’s knowledge, attitudes and individual perception of the disease. To date, few
studies have documented the gender and ethnographic differences in the af-
fected communities. Few studies on knowledge, attitudes, perception, beliefs,
and practices about EVD are available locally.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Design
The study took on a cross-sectional design. Both qualitative and quantitative
data collection methods were used to gather data from July to November 2015.
The cross-sectional research design was adopted in order to elicit information
on the situation from a sample of the population at one point in time and to
document EVD experiences from various groups in Bundibugyo District. This
design was also adopted because it enables the examination of functional rela-
tionships in this case through describing beliefs, practices, experiences and ef-
fects of Ebola Virus Disease from a gender perspective. The quantitative design
was vital in eliciting the generalised gendered knowledge, attitudes, perceptions,
beliefs, management, treatment and effects of EVD in Bundibugyo District. The
qualitative approaches allowed the collection of data on various opinions and at-
tributes of the population (men and women) under study in more detail.
2.2. Area of the Study and Rationale
The study was conducted in Bundibugyo District. The district is located in the
Western region of Uganda bordering the Democratic Republic of the Congo
alongside several bordering districts: Ntoroko District to the northeast, Kibaale
District to the east, Kabarole District to the south, and the DRC to the west and
north. The district headquarters at Bundibugyo are located approximately 32
kilometres by road, west of Fort Portal, the nearest large town. This is about 72
kilometres by road, north of Kasese, the largest town in the sub-region. The
geographic boundaries of the district are the Semliki River to the west, the
Rwenzori mountains to the east, and Lake Albert to the north. In 2014, the na-
tional population census put the town’s population at 18,823 (UBOS, 2014). Be-
ing a rugged mountainous area, physical access to the region is often difficult
and is only many by foot. Bundibugyo District was selected because of its char-
This research hasn't been cited in any other publications.
  • Article
    Full-text available
    Editor's note: A Chinese version (中文译本) of this article is available. Background On March 23, 2014, the World Health Organization (WHO) was notified of an outbreak of Ebola virus disease (EVD) in Guinea. On August 8, the WHO declared the epidemic to be a “public health emergency of international concern.” Methods By September 14, 2014, a total of 4507 probable and confirmed cases, including 2296 deaths from EVD (Zaire species) had been reported from five countries in West Africa — Guinea, Liberia, Nigeria, Senegal, and Sierra Leone. We analyzed a detailed subset of data on 3343 confirmed and 667 probable Ebola cases collected in Guinea, Liberia, Nigeria, and Sierra Leone as of September 14. Results The majority of patients are 15 to 44 years of age (49.9% male), and we estimate that the case fatality rate is 70.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 69 to 73) among persons with known clinical outcome of infection. The course of infection, including signs and symptoms, incubation period (11.4 days), and serial interval (15.3 days), is similar to that reported in previous outbreaks of EVD. On the basis of the initial periods of exponential growth, the estimated basic reproduction numbers (R0) are 1.71 (95% CI, 1.44 to 2.01) for Guinea, 1.83 (95% CI, 1.72 to 1.94) for Liberia, and 2.02 (95% CI, 1.79 to 2.26) for Sierra Leone. The estimated current reproduction numbers (R) are 1.81 (95% CI, 1.60 to 2.03) for Guinea, 1.51 (95% CI, 1.41 to 1.60) for Liberia, and 1.38 (95% CI, 1.27 to 1.51) for Sierra Leone; the corresponding doubling times are 15.7 days (95% CI, 12.9 to 20.3) for Guinea, 23.6 days (95% CI, 20.2 to 28.2) for Liberia, and 30.2 days (95% CI, 23.6 to 42.3) for Sierra Leone. Assuming no change in the control measures for this epidemic, by November 2, 2014, the cumulative reported numbers of confirmed and probable cases are predicted to be 5740 in Guinea, 9890 in Liberia, and 5000 in Sierra Leone, exceeding 20,000 in total. Conclusions These data indicate that without drastic improvements in control measures, the numbers of cases of and deaths from EVD are expected to continue increasing from hundreds to thousands per week in the coming months.
  • Article
    Full-text available
    Background: The West African Ebola epidemic has demonstrated that the existing range of medical and epidemiological responses to emerging disease outbreaks is insufficient, especially in post-conflict contexts with exceedingly poor healthcare infrastructures. In this context, community-based responses have proven vital for containing Ebola virus disease (EVD) and shifting the epidemic curve. Despite a surge in interest in local innovations that effectively contained the epidemic, the mechanisms for community-based response remain unclear. This study provides baseline information on community-based epidemic control priorities and identifies innovative local strategies for containing EVD in Liberia. Methodology/principal findings: This study was conducted in September 2014 in 15 communities in Monrovia and Montserrado County, Liberia--one of the epicenters of the Ebola outbreak. Findings from 15 focus group discussions with 386 community leaders identified strategies being undertaken and recommendations for what a community-based response to Ebola should look like under then-existing conditions. Data were collected on the following topics: prevention, surveillance, care-giving, community-based treatment and support, networks and hotlines, response teams, Ebola treatment units (ETUs) and hospitals, the management of corpses, quarantine and isolation, orphans, memorialization, and the need for community-based training and education. Findings have been presented as community-based strategies and recommendations for (1) prevention, (2) treatment and response, and (3) community sequelae and recovery. Several models for community-based management of the current Ebola outbreak were proposed. Additional findings indicate positive attitudes towards early Ebola survivors, and the need for community-based psychosocial support. Conclusions/significance: Local communities' strategies and recommendations give insight into how urban Liberian communities contained the EVD outbreak while navigating the systemic failures of the initial state and international response. Communities in urban Liberia adapted to the epidemic using multiple coping strategies. In the absence of health, infrastructural and material supports, local people engaged in self-reliance in order to contain the epidemic at the micro-social level. These innovations were regarded as necessary, but as less desirable than a well-supported health-systems based response; and were seen as involving considerable individual, social, and public health costs, including heightened vulnerability to infection.
  • Article
    Full-text available
    On July 20, 2014, the first known case of Ebola virus disease (Ebola) in Nigeria, in a traveler from Liberia, led to an outbreak that was successfully curtailed with infection control, contact tracing, isolation, and quarantine measures coordinated through an incident management system. During this outbreak, most contacts underwent home monitoring, which included instructions to stay home or to avoid crowded areas if staying home was not possible. However, for five contacts with high-risk exposures, group quarantine in an observation unit was preferred because the five had crowded home environments or occupations that could have resulted in a large number of community exposures if they developed Ebola.
  • Article
    The 2014 Ebola outbreak in West Africa, primarily affecting Guinea, Sierra Leone, and Liberia, has exceeded all previous Ebola outbreaks in the number of cases and in international response. There have been 20 significant outbreaks of Ebola virus disease in Sub-Saharan Africa prior to the 2014 outbreak, the largest being that in Uganda in 2000, with 425 cases and a mortality of 53%. Since the first outbreaks in Sudan and Zaire in 1976, transmission within health facilities has been of major concern, affecting healthcare workers and acting as amplifiers of spread into the community. The lack of resources for infection control and personal protective equipment are the main reasons for nosocomial transmission. Local strategies to improve infection control, and a greater understanding of local community views on the disease, have helped to bring outbreaks under control. Recommendations from previous outbreaks include improved disease surveillance to enable more rapid health responses, the wider availability of personal protective equipment, and greater international preparedness. Copyright © 2015 The Healthcare Infection Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
  • Article
    Full-text available
    In resource-limited areas, isolation of the sick from the population at large has been the cornerstone of control of Ebola virus disease (EVD) since the virus was discovered in 1976.(1) Although this strategy by itself may be effective in controlling small outbreaks in remote settings, it has offered little hope to infected people and their families in the absence of medical care. In the current West African outbreak, infection control and clinical management efforts are necessarily being implemented on a larger scale than in any previous outbreak, and it is therefore appropriate to reassess traditional efforts at disease management. Having . . .
  • Article
    Full-text available
    The tremendous outbreak of Ebola virus disease occurring in West Africa since the end of 2013 surprises by its remoteness from previous epidemics and dramatic extent. This review aims to describe the 27 manifestations of Ebola virus that arose after its discovery in 1976. It provides an update on research on the ecology of Ebola viruses, modes of contamination and human transmission of the disease that are mainly linked to close contact with an infected animal or a patient suffering from the disease. The recommendations to contain the epidemic and challenges to achieve it are reminded.
  • Article
    Full-text available
    A confirmed Ebola haemorrhagic fever (EHF) outbreak in Bundibugyo, Uganda, November 2007–February 2008, was caused by a putative new species (Bundibugyo ebolavirus). It included 93 putative cases, 56 laboratory-confirmed cases, and 37 deaths (CFR = 25%). Study objectives are to describe clinical manifestations and case management for 26 hospitalised laboratory-confirmed EHF patients. Clinical findings are congruous with previously reported EHF infections. The most frequently experienced symptoms were non-bloody diarrhoea (81%), severe headache (81%), and asthenia (77%). Seven patients reported or were observed with haemorrhagic symptoms, six of whom died. Ebola care remains difficult due to the resource-poor setting of outbreaks and the infection-control procedures required. However, quality data collection is essential to evaluate case definitions and therapeutic interventions, and needs improvement in future epidemics. Organizations usually involved in EHF case management have a particular responsibility in this respect.
  • Article
    Full-text available
    Since the year 2000, Uganda has experienced repeated outbreaks of viral hemorrhagic fevers (VHF). Ebola VHF outbreak occurred in the districts of Gulu in 2000, Bundibugyo, 2007, Luwero, 2011, Kibaale in July 2012, Luwero in November 2012. Marburg VHF was earlier reported in Ibanda in 2007. More recently in 2012, two outbreaks of Marburg VHF have occurred in Ibanda and Kabale districts. To present the epidemiological picture of the Marburg VHF recently reported in Ibanda and Kabale districts and propose research questions to generate evidence to mitigate future epidemics. A case definition for a VHF was developed. A frequency distribution of symptoms of confirmed and probable cases was done. Descriptive analyses of reported cases using simple percentages, percent distributions and computation of means was performed. The Marburg epidemic was reported in early September and by November 2012, a cumulative of 14 cases (9 confirmed and 5 probable) including 7 deaths had been registered, giving a case fatality rate (CFR) of 50%. A total of 202 contacts had been listed; out of which 193 had completed the 21-day follow-up period. The index case was a 33-year old male, a teacher at Nyakatukura Secondary School in Ibanda district. He travelled to Ibanda from Kabale, his home district on 31st August 2012, reportedly healthy. He fell sick on 3rd September 2012 with complaints of fever, headache, loss of appetite and general body weakness. Overall, the dominant symptoms for all cases were fever, vomiting, loss of appetite, headache, abdominal pain, fatigue, diarrhea, and the least in occurrence was bleeding which accounted for 35.5% of all the cases. The source of infection for all the five Ebola Hemorrhagic fever outbreaks in Uganda and the recent Marburg VHF outbreak in Ibanda and Kabale is not known. Currently there is suspicion that there could be an animal reservoir of the Ebola and Marburg viruses from where occasional spillage into the human population occurs resulting in disease outbreaks. This and other hypotheses require further investigation.
  • Article
    Full-text available
    Two large outbreaks of Ebola hemorrhagic fever occurred in Uganda in 2000 and 2007. In May 2011, we identified a single case of Sudan Ebola virus disease in Luwero District. The establishment of a permanent in-country laboratory and cooperation between international public health entities facilitated rapid outbreak response and control activities.