ArticlePDF Available

Abstract and Figures

This manuscript seeks to offer insight about how coaches can better address drinking among collegiate student-athletes. Using a mixed-methods design, 519 NCAA coaches reported their attitudes and behaviors toward student-athlete drinking, and responded to open-ended questions about their perceived role, strategies, and challenges to addressing problems in this population. Three dimensions of coaches’ attitudes and behaviors toward student-athlete drinking emerged that were consistent regardless of the players’ or coach’s gender or division: Concerned Communication, Conditional Leniency, and Enforcement. Effective strategies identified by coaches included enforcement of policy, education about consequences of drinking, establishment of quality coach-athlete relationships, and management of athletes’ schedules. Coaches indicated the need to play a role in managing, educating, influencing, and supporting the student-athletes to prevent alcohol misuse. Coaches reported challenges regarding the culture of drinking on college campuses, individual differences (e.g., age) among student-athletes, acceptance and enforcement of the alcohol policy, lack of awareness about student-athletes’ activities, and identification of alcohol misuse.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Journal of Clinical Sport Psychology, 2019, 13, 524542
https://doi.org/10.1123/jcsp.2018-0083
© 2019 Human Kinetics, Inc. INVITED
How Coaches Can Prevent and Address
Alcohol Consumption Among
Student-Athletes
Graig M. Chow, Matthew D. Bird, Stinne Soendergaard, and
Yanyun Yang
Florida State University
This manuscript seeks to offer insight about how coaches can better address
drinking among collegiate student-athletes. Using a mixed-methods design, 519
NCAA coaches reported their attitudes and behaviors toward student-athlete
drinking, and responded to open-ended questions about their perceived role,
strategies, and challenges to addressing problems in this population. Three
dimensions of coachesattitudes and behaviors toward student-athlete drinking
emerged that were consistent regardless of the playersor coachs gender or
division: Concerned Communication, Conditional Leniency, and Enforcement.
Effective strategies identied by coaches included enforcement of policy, educa-
tion about consequences of drinking, establishment of quality coach-athlete
relationships, and management of athletesschedules. Coaches indicated the
need to play a role in managing, educating, inuencing, and supporting the
student-athletes to prevent alcohol misuse. Coaches reported challenges regarding
the culture of drinking on college campuses, individual differences (e.g., age)
among student-athletes, acceptance and enforcement of the alcohol policy, lack of
awareness about student-athletesactivities, and identication of alcohol misuse.
Keywords:coaching, mental health, mixed-methods, substance use
Alcohol use represents an important mental health issue for student-athletes.
Specically, 77% of student-athletes consume alcohol and 42% engage in binge
drinking (i.e., 4 or more drinks for women and 5 or more drinks for men; NCAA,
2018). As a result of alcohol use, student-athletes report negative consequences
such as experiencing blackouts, which are red ags for developing alcohol
addiction, as well as academic and athletic performance consequences
(Hainline, Bell, & Wilfret, 2014;Brenner & Swanik, 2007). Given the potential
negative impact on performance, coaches have an opportunity to prevent and
Chow, Bird, Soendergaard, and Yang are with the Department of Educational Psychology and Learning
Systems, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL. Address author correspondence to Graig M. Chow
at gchow@fsu.edu.
524
Brought to you by JCSP Board Membership (1/3) | Authenticated gchow@fsu.edu | Downloaded 12/03/19 02:07 PM UTC
manage the alcohol consumption of their student-athletes. Therefore, the current
study investigates the role of coaches in addressing this important issue.
Coaches play a pivotal role in the mental health and well-being of their athletes
(Rice et al., 2016). Coaches report observing mental health concerns, although at
lower rates than athletes report experiencing such issues (Biggin, Burns, & Uphill,
2017). While the primary responsibility of a coach centers on developing players
athletic skills and winning, there is growing belief that the truly exceptional
coaches also focus on the development of their athletes as human beings (Jowett,
2005). This not only includes promoting character development, ethical behavior,
and a balanced lifestyle, but also recognizing the signs and symptoms of mental
illness and substance use (Biggin et al., 2017). Collegiate coaches are in a prime
position to identify mental health problems in their athletes and deter maladaptive
behaviors because they spend so much quality time with them and have consider-
able power and inuence (Thompson & Sherman, 2007). Although materials exist
to educate coaches about the effects of alcohol on performance and student-athlete
drinking motives, little is known about how coaches prevent and manage their
student-athletesalcohol use.
There are several theoretical explanations supporting a coachsinuence on
their athletesdrinking behaviors and the mechanism in which coachesattitudes
and behaviors may inuence athlete drinking. The Social Ecology Model for
Alcohol Use Among College Athletes (Williams, Perko, Belcher, & Leaver-Dunn,
2006) proposes that head coachs rules, beliefs, and attitudes about athlete drinking
inuence athletesalcohol consumption. For example, coachesdiscouragement of
alcohol use may lead to restricted consumption by athletes. Team-specic rules
enforced by coaches that delineate alcohol limitations shape group norms and
subsequent drinking behavior. From a social identity perspective, an inuential in-
group member (e.g., head coach) cultivates group identity and encourages
members to adopt values to motivate collective action that afrms social identi-
cation (Slater, Coffee, Barker, & Evans, 2014). Research adopting a social identity
perspective highlights the importance of leaders who can serve a protective
function against maladaptive alcohol-related behaviors (Zhou & Heim, 2014,
2016).
Scholars have long identied coaches as key agents for impacting the alcohol
consumption of athletes (Williams et al., 2006), and some have gone as far as
recommending the inclusion of coaches in comprehensive alcohol prevention and
intervention programs (Martens, Dams-OConnor, & Beck, 2006). However, a
better understanding of the specic coach attitudes and behaviors that exert
inuence on athletesalcohol use is needed. Few studies have examined the
extent to which coaches are instrumental in deterring or inadvertently permitting
athlete drinking. For instance, coaches may establish and enforce alcohol policies
in an attempt to manage athletesalcohol consumption, but the effectiveness of
such rule-based strategies are inconclusive (Pitts, Chow, & Yang, 2018;Williams
et al., 2008). Conversely, coaches who approve of, or are lenient toward, alcohol
use may unknowingly contribute to the high prevalence of drinking among athletes
(Mastroleo, Marzell, Turrisi, & Borsari, 2012;Seitz, Wyrick, Rulison, Strack, &
Fearnow-Kenney, 2014).
Most studies examining the extent to which coaches impact their athletes
drinking lacked a valid and reliable measure of coachesattitudes and behaviors
JCSP Vol. 13, No. 4, 2019
Coach Managing Alcohol 525
Brought to you by JCSP Board Membership (1/3) | Authenticated gchow@fsu.edu | Downloaded 12/03/19 02:07 PM UTC
toward athlete alcohol use (e.g., Mastroleo et al. 2012;Seitz et al. 2014). However,
Pitts et al. (2018) recently developed and tested such a measure and found three
factors: Enforcement (e.g., coach has clearly dened rules about athlete alcohol use
including explicit consequences for violation, and fair enforcement of policies),
Conditional Leniency (e.g., coach acts permissively or is accepting of athlete
drinking under certain circumstances, and lacks general discouragement), and
Concerned Communication (e.g., coach talks about the consequences of alcohol
use, discusses safe drinking strategies, is actively aware of athlete drinking
attitudes and behaviors, and creates a comfortable and approachable climate).
Multilevel modeling results revealed that higher concerned communication and
lower conditional leniency were associated with less athlete alcohol use and heavy
episodic drinking, whereas enforcement had no effect. It is important to note that
the measure created by Pitts et al. (2018) assessed athletesevaluations of their
head coachs attitudes and behaviors regarding athlete alcohol use rather than head
coachesself-reports. Validating a measure of coachesown perceptions is
necessary to advance this line of inquiry and would be particularly benecial
for using as an outcome measure for intervention programs targeted at coaches
(e.g., Pierce, Liaw, Dobell, & Anderson, 2010).
Coaches have reported that training and education about athlete mental
health is needed (Biggin et al., 2017). To this end, programs have been designed
for coaches that focus on student-athlete alcohol use including how to recognize
signs and symptoms of misuse, communicate with athletes suspected of misuse,
and provide appropriate referral for services (Nolt, Sachs, & Brenner, 2013;
Wyrick, Wilfert, Milroy, & Burley, 2013). However, psychometrically valid
measures are needed to evaluate the efcacy and effectiveness of such programs.
Optimal measures are those that demonstrate invariance across important
demographic characteristics (e.g., coach gender, gender of team, and NCAA
division).
A stronger empirical basis is needed to inform interventions designed for
coaches to better manage student-athletesalcohol use. Coaches have varying
beliefs regarding their role in the identication and management of athlete mental
health. Some coaches believe it is their role to be part of the identication and
referral process, but not their role to intervene (Ferguson, Swann, Liddle, & Vella,
2019). Another perceived role of the coach is considered a proactive one which
involves talking to the athlete if concerned (Ferguson et al., 2019). Conversely, a
coach-athlete relationship role characterized by increased conict and decreased
support has been found to contribute to increased mental illness (Shanmugam,
Jowett, & Meyer, 2013). In addition to understanding coachesperceived role it is
imperative to examine the barriers and challenges coaches face in the prevention
and management of athlete alcohol use. Very few studies have addressed this
area. For example, challenges reported by some coaches are that they do not feel
adequately educated to intervene and that student-athletes may be susceptible to
buying into the cultural myth that campus life is about heavy and frequent alcohol
use (Hainline et al., 2014).
This study aims to examine coachesattitudes and behaviors toward athlete
alcohol consumption, as well as perceived role, effective strategies, and barriers
in managing athlete alcohol use. The following research questions were posed:
(a) What is the factor structure of the Coach Attitudes and Behaviors toward
JCSP Vol. 13, No. 4, 2019
526 Chow et al.
Brought to you by JCSP Board Membership (1/3) | Authenticated gchow@fsu.edu | Downloaded 12/03/19 02:07 PM UTC
Athlete Alcohol Use scale and is it invariant across coach gender, team gender, and
NCAA division? (b) What role should coaches play in managing alcohol use of
their student-athletes? (c) What strategies do coaches nd to be effective in
managing alcohol use of their student-athletes? (d) What challenges have coaches
experienced in managing alcohol use of their student-athletes?
Methods
Participants
Participants in this study were 519 NCAA head coaches (male =346, female =173)
representing Division I (n=160), Division II (n=129), and Division III (n=230)
institutions. Head coaches worked with spring sport teams including baseball
(n=74), softball (n=138), mensandwomens golf (n
mens only
=42, n
womens only
=
58, n
both
=27), mensandwomenstennis(n
mens only
=11, n
womens only
=30, n
both
=
38), and mensandwomens track and eld (n
mensonly
=11, n
womensonly
=14,
n
both
=76). Coaches were 44.81 years of age on average (SD =12.12, range =2375),
and identied as being Caucasian (n=467), African American (n=19), Hispanic
(n=7), Multi-ethnic/Mixed (n=10), Asian (n=4), Other (n=4), American Indian
(n=2), Middle Eastern (n=1), and PacicIslander(n=1), while 4 chose not to
disclose their race. Participants reported an average of 16.60 years (SD =10.31,
range =150) coaching their current sport, and 8.95 years (SD =8.62, range =150)
coaching at their current institution. In terms of their previous education/training in
student-athlete alcohol use, a majority of coaches had received training from their
athletic department (n=254) or University (n=204). Other sources of training
included a course while in college (n=122), conference workshop (n=98), or an
online course (n=71). Additionally, 47 coaches reported they had received some
other form of training, while 116 coaches reported they had not received any form of
education on student-athlete alcohol use.
Measures
Coach attitudes and behaviors toward athlete alcohol use. To measure head
coach attitudes and behaviors toward athlete drinking, the Athlete Perceptions of
Coach Attitudes and Behaviors toward Athlete Alcohol Use scale was modied
(Pitts et al., 2018). The stem My head coachwas substituted for Ito measure
head coachesperceptions of their own attitudes and behaviors. In a study with
897 collegiate softball players from 63 NCAA teams using EFA with the design-
effect adjusted standard errors approach (e.g., Hahs-Vaughn, 2005), Pitts et al.
(2018) found support for three factors: Concerned Communication, Conditional
Leniency, and Enforcement. Internal consistency reliabilities of the three sub-
scales were all above α=.90. Head coaches rate each item on a six-point Likert-
type scale from 1 (strongly disagree)to6(strongly agree). Example items include
I talk to my players about alcohol use throughout the year(Concerned
Communication), I do not mind if my players drink, as long as they drink
responsibly(Conditional Leniency), and I have a strict policy about alcohol
use(Enforcement).
JCSP Vol. 13, No. 4, 2019
Coach Managing Alcohol 527
Brought to you by JCSP Board Membership (1/3) | Authenticated gchow@fsu.edu | Downloaded 12/03/19 02:07 PM UTC
Qualitative open-ended questions. To complement the quantitative data, three
open-ended questions were asked to better understand head coachesperceived
role, effective strategies, and challenges related to managing athletesalcohol use.
Questions included: What role should coaches play in preventing or managing
alcohol use of their student-athletes?, What strategies or approaches do you nd to
be effective in preventing or managing alcohol use of your student-athletes?, and
What challenges have you experienced, if any, in preventing or managing alcohol
use of your student-athletes?
Procedure
Following university institutional review board approval, 5,183 head coaches
representing baseball, softball, golf, tennis, and track and eld at all NCAA
Division I, II, and III institutions were contacted via an initial email during the
spring season requesting their voluntary participation in the study. Head coaches
who consented to participate completed an electronic survey comprised of a
short demographics questionnaire, Coach Attitudes and Behaviors toward Athlete
Alcohol Use, and the qualitative open-ended questions. After the initial email to
head coaches, participants were sent three follow-up emails reminding them of
the opportunity to participate in the study. Follow-up emails were sent on three
separate occasions at two-week intervals from the initial email. Data collection
occurred during the middle of the competitive season to provide a standardized
time point.
Analysis
Quantitative analysis. An exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM)
framework was used to examine the factor structure of the Coach Attitudes and
Behaviors toward Athlete Alcohol Use scale. Robust maximum likelihood with
geomin rotation (an oblique rotation) was performed using Mplus version 7.31. To
determine the factor structure, weconsidered a combination of the following criteria:
simple structure, salience of factor loadings (greater than .40 on the target factor
and smaller than .30 on the untarget factor), conceptual clarity, and interpretability.
Based on the nal ESEM model, measurement invariance testing was conducted for
coach gender (male =346, female =173), gender of team coached (mensteam
only =138, womens team only =240, both mens and womens team =141) and
division (DI =160, DII =129, DIII =230). Specically, three nested models with
increasing number of parameter constraints were tested: congural invariance
model tests whether groups demonstrate the same factor structure, metric invari-
ance model examines whether the factor loadings are the same across groups, and
scalar invariance model further examines whether the item intercepts are the same
across groups.
Qualitative analysis. For the open-ended responses, content analysis using
inductive methods was employed to identify salient themes from participants
responses (Côté, Salmela, Baria, & Russell, 1993). After initial data collection, the
second and third authors worked independently to label independent meaning
units. Meaning units represented complete quotes which were interpretable as a
JCSP Vol. 13, No. 4, 2019
528 Chow et al.
Brought to you by JCSP Board Membership (1/3) | Authenticated gchow@fsu.edu | Downloaded 12/03/19 02:07 PM UTC
stand-alone unit of data. The researchers met to discuss any discrepancies in their
labeling until consensus was reached. If the two researchers could not reach
consensus, the rst author was included until a nal decision was made. Labels
were then categorized inductively by the second and third author to produce second
level themes. The researchers worked independently on the second level themes
and met to discuss any discrepancies in categorization. If agreement could not be
reached, the rst author was again included until a decision was made. Second
level themes were then categorized inductively to produce third level themes
following the same procedure.
Quantitative Results
Coach Attitudes and Behaviors Toward Athlete Alcohol Use
Based on the factor structure found in Pitts et al. (2018), a three-factor model
with 27 items was examined. The model demonstrated adequate t: χ
2
=756.14,
df =273, p<.001, CFI =.923, TLI =.900, RMSEA =.058 (90% CI =.053, .063),
SRMR =.036. However, modication indexes suggested adding a residual
covariance between x18 and x19. This was conceptually justied as both items
pertain to players violating the alcohol policy. This added parameter signicantly
improved model t. The nal model consists of three factors and one residual
covariance: χ
2
=698.24, df =272, p<.001, CFI =.932, TLI =.912, RMSEA =
.055 (90% CI =.050, .060), SRMR =.035. Table 1presents the standardized
factor loadings. The residual correlation between x18 and x19 was .371. Factor 1
was Concerned Communication and loadings ranged from .502 to .758 (all cross
loadings under .29). Factor 2 was Conditional Leniency and loadings ranged from
.502 to .888 (all cross loadings under .17). Factor 3 was Enforcement and loadings
ranged from .478 to .865 (all cross loadings under .26). Factor intercorrelations
revealed that Concerned Communication was negatively associated with Condi-
tional Leniency (r=.264) and positively associated with Enforcement (r=.415).
Conditional Leniency was negatively correlated with Enforcement (r=.286).
A model-based internal consistency reliability, coefcient omega (ω;McDonald,
1999), was computed for each subscale. Coefcient ωwas .905, .931, and .783
for Concerned Communication (10 items), Conditional Leniency (10 items) and
Enforcement (7 items), respectively. Coefcient omega can be interpreted as the
percentage of variance in the subscale scores explained by the target factor.
Measurement Invariance Testing
Based on the three-factor model with a residual covariance, measurement invari-
ance test was conducted across coach gender, gender of team coached, and
division. Invariance was tenable if the added cross-group equality constraints
on parameters did not deteriorate model-data t as evidenced by an overlapped
condence interval of RMSEA and the absolute difference in CFI being smaller
than .01. As shown in Table 2, congural, metric, and scalar invariance held across
groups. We can conclude that the scale measures the same three factors equally
well across groups. Last, we computed the standardized mean difference in three
JCSP Vol. 13, No. 4, 2019
Coach Managing Alcohol 529
Brought to you by JCSP Board Membership (1/3) | Authenticated gchow@fsu.edu | Downloaded 12/03/19 02:07 PM UTC
Table 1 Standardized Factor Loadings and Factor Correlations for
Coach Attitudes and Behaviors (N=519)
Item Item
Concerned
Communication
Conditional
Leniency Enforcement
9 I talk to my players about
alcohol use throughout the
year
.758 .072 .035
27 I talk to my players about
the negative consequences
of drinking
.751 .038 .076
2 I talk to my players about
how to handle offers of
alcoholic drinks
.710 .004 .016
23 I use stories to illustrate
how others have been
affected by alcohol use
.658 .003 .156
36 I ask my players directly
about their alcohol use
.643 .104 .056
13 I talk to my players about
how drinking is inconsis-
tent with their goals
.640 .169 .000
7 I talk to my players about
the effect alcohol has on
physical performance
.631 .152 .053
1 I ask my players about
their thoughts and opinions
about alcohol use
.625 .095 .090
26 I try to be aware of the
extent of alcohol use on my
team
.519 .007 .254
10 I use personal experiences
to deter my players from
drinking
.502 .000 .162
6 I do not mind if my players
drink, as long as they drink
responsibly
.041 .888 .006
15 I do not mind if my players
drink once in a while
.019 .883 .004
11 I think it is okay if my
players of legal age drink
.000 .864 .087
35 I think it is okay if my
players drink during the
off-season
.027 .854 .097
22 I do not mind if my players
drink on special occasions
.036 .838 .020
(continued)
530 JCSP Vol. 13, No. 4, 2019
Brought to you by JCSP Board Membership (1/3) | Authenticated gchow@fsu.edu | Downloaded 12/03/19 02:07 PM UTC
latent factors across groups, that is, Cohensdeffect size. The results are shown in
Table 3. All effect sizes were small (<.30).
Qualitative Results
Coaches were asked about their perceived role, effective strategies, and challenges
experienced in managing student-athlete alcohol use. Results are presented in
Table 1 (continued)
Item Item
Concerned
Communication
Conditional
Leniency Enforcement
24 I am very much against my
players drinking alcohol
RS
.108 .768 .027
4 I believe that drinking is
part of the college experi-
ence for my players
.085 .703 .027
42 I acknowledge that drink-
ing occurs on my team
.286 .553 .004
5 I occasionally make com-
ments that I drink
.120 .505 .034
14 I prohibit my players from
drinking during the season
of competition
RS
.118 .502 243
34 I have a strict policy about
alcohol use
.008 .152 .865
25 I have clearly dened
consequences for violating
the alcohol policy
.032 044 .840
16 I have a clear policy about
alcohol use
.072 .033 .776
19 I punish my players who
violate the alcohol policy
.035 .014 .621
43 I am clear and consistent in
my expectations of alcohol
use by my players
.273 .001 .578
30 I have specic rules about
my players drinking before
practices and competitions
.099 .002 .516
18 I do not make exceptions
for my players who violate
the alcohol policy
.031 .029 .478
Factor Correlation:
Conditional Leniency
.264***
Enforcement .415*** .286***
Note.RS=Item is reverse scored.
***p<.001.
JCSP Vol. 13, No. 4, 2019
Coach Managing Alcohol 531
Brought to you by JCSP Board Membership (1/3) | Authenticated gchow@fsu.edu | Downloaded 12/03/19 02:07 PM UTC
terms of the themes and meaning units endorsed by coaches. Direct quotes are
presented to elucidate particular themes.
What role should coaches play in preventing or managing
alcohol use of their student-athletes? (N=369)
Responses were coded into 580 stand-alone meaning units (see Table 4). Roles
fell into ve third-level themes: management,educational,behavioral-inuence,
supportive,andcoach-athlete relationship.Somecoaches(n=27) simply expressed
that their role was important without further elaboration, and 11 gave responses that
did not t into any themes.
The highest endorsed was a management role (n=147; meaning units =162;
see 2
nd
level breakdown meaning units in table) consisting of three subthemes.
The rst involved setting an alcohol use policy or expectations (n=104 [106]),
Table 2 Model-Data Fit Evaluation Using ESEM
Model χ2
MLR df
Correction
Factor CFI RMSEA
RMSEA
90% C.I. SRMR
Total sample
3-factor model 756.135* 273 1.1794 .923 .058 [.053, .063] .036
Revised
3-factor model
(×18 with ×19)
698.244* 272 1.1752 .932 .055 [.050, .060] .035
Measurement invariance by coach gender
Congural
invariance
1107.195* 544 1.0991 .916 .063 [.058, .068] .041
Metric
invariance
1209.972* 616 1.1041 .911 .061 [.056, .066] .060
Scalar
invariance
1255.298* 640 1.1003 .908 .061 [.056, .066] .061
Measurement invariance by team gender
Congural
invariance
1382.376* 816 1.0663 .918 .063 [.058, .069] .044
Metric
invariance
1528.783* 960 1.0788 .917 .059 [.053, .064] .071
Scalar
invariance
1614.403* 1008 1.0742 .912 .059 [.054, .064] .076
Measurement invariance by division
Congural
invariance
1474.204* 816 1.0544 .905 .068 [.063, .074] .045
Metric
invariance
1597.227* 960 1.0669 .908 .062 [.057, .067] .061
Scalar
invariance
1656.125* 1008 1.0629 .906 .061 [.056, .066] .063
JCSP Vol. 13, No. 4, 2019
532 Chow et al.
Brought to you by JCSP Board Membership (1/3) | Authenticated gchow@fsu.edu | Downloaded 12/03/19 02:07 PM UTC
while the second involved enforcing the alcohol use policy or expectations (n=41
[42]). One coach stated that coaches should abide by and follow the NCAA
alcohol policy, as well as communicate/enforce this with the student-athletes.
The third subtheme involved creating a team culture of alcohol use standards
(n=13 [14]), as the culture of the team begins with the coach.
The second most endorsed was an educational role (n=133 [145]), which
contained four subthemes. The rst involved teaching athletes about the negative
consequences of alcohol use (n=62 [67]), particularly how it impacts academic
and athletic performance. As one coach stated, coaches need to make sure their
athletes understand the negative effects on athletic and academic performance of
alcohol abuse.The second subtheme involved providing general alcohol use
information (n=37 [37]), aimed at helping athletes make informed decisions
regarding their drinking behavior, or understanding their own behavioral tenden-
cies. As one coach stated, I feel it is important to give them as much information as
possible and hope that they make good decisions.The third subtheme involved
teaching responsibility (n=35 [35]), which emphasized student-athlete autonomy
and making good decisions. One coach stated, I feel we are here to help each
student understand the importance of them taking ownership of their decisions.
The last subtheme involved teaching athletes how to be healthy by being a positive
inuence (n=6 [6]). One coach claimed their role is to keep our players healthy,
but to also impact their lives in a positive manner.
The next endorsed was a behavioral-inuence role (n=98 [107]) consisting of
four subthemes. The rst involved guiding or advising (n=39 [42]) by making
effective recommendations regarding alcohol use while serving in a parental or
mentor role. As one coach stated, the coachesrole should be as mentor, teacher,
and create a safe environment to discuss issues such as drinking.The second
subtheme involved being a role model (n=30 [30]) by focusing on setting a good
example both on and off the eld and modeling proper alcohol use behavior. The
third subtheme involved communicating about alcohol use (n=21 [21]) by talking
directly about alcohol use, abuse, and policy as a way to inuence behavior. As one
Table 3 Standardized Mean Difference in Latent Factors Across
Groups
Concerned
Communication
Conditional
Leniency Enforcement
Coach Gender
Female .071 .156 .274
Division
II .063 .236 .128
III .089 .005 .019
Team Gender
Women .277 .021 .101
Both .126 .012 .056
Note. The reference group was male coach group, Division I, and Men Team, respectively.
JCSP Vol. 13, No. 4, 2019
Coach Managing Alcohol 533
Brought to you by JCSP Board Membership (1/3) | Authenticated gchow@fsu.edu | Downloaded 12/03/19 02:07 PM UTC
Table 4 Qualitative Themes and Meaning Units Endorsed by
Coaches
Third Level
Theme N(MU) Second Level Theme N(MU)
Perceived Roles
Management 147 (162) Set alcohol policy/expectations 104 (106)
Enforce alcohol policy/expectations 41 (42)
Set team culture/values 13 (14)
Educational 133 (145) Educate on the consequences of alcohol use 62 (67)
Provide information/education 37 (37)
Teach responsibility 35 (35)
Health education/positive inuence 6 (6)
Behavioral-
inuence
98 (107) Guide/advise 39 (42)
Be a role model 30 (30)
Communicate about alcohol use 21 (21)
Use position to inuence athletes 14 (14)
Supportive 62 (74) Be attentive 35 (36)
Handle alcohol use issues appropriately 20 (21)
Support student-athlete 14 (17)
Coach-athlete
relationship
48 (54) Have trust/openness with athletes 24 (25)
Involvement/care 14 (14)
Treat athletes like adults 8 (8)
Be approachable 7 (7)
Perceived Strategies
Policy 171 (214) Alcohol use policy 144 (176)
Open communication/comfortable
environment
30 (30)
Flexibility 7 (8)
Education 167 (199) Communication about alcohol use 81 (88)
Education on negative alcohol effects 54 (56)
Education about alcohol use 21 (21)
Institutional educational resource 20 (20)
Share personal experiences 13 (14)
Relationships 109 (120) Empowering athletes to make good
decisions
56 (59)
Open, honest, trusting relationship 19 (19)
Show attentiveness 17 (17)
Understanding 9 (9)
Compassion 9 (9)
Role model 7 (7)
(continued)
534 JCSP Vol. 13, No. 4, 2019
Brought to you by JCSP Board Membership (1/3) | Authenticated gchow@fsu.edu | Downloaded 12/03/19 02:07 PM UTC
coach said, I feel that it is critical in our student-athletesdevelopment to speak
with them regarding alcohol use.The last subtheme involved using their leader-
ship position to inuence athletesbehaviors (n=14 [14]). As stated by one coach:
I feel they should play a big role as the student athletes spend a lot of time with the
team and coaches can have a big impact on players behaviors.
The fourth endorsed was a supportive role (n=62 [74]), which consisted of
three subthemes. The rst involved being attentive to signs of alcohol use among
their athletes (n=35 [36]) by identifying whether alcohol use is interfering with
functioning. As one coach claimed, a coach should be aware if alcohol is affecting
a student-athlete not only on the playing eld but if it is making his/her life
unmanageable.The second subtheme involved handling alcohol use issues in an
appropriate manner (n=20 [21]), and focused on proactively handling instances
of misuse, putting the athlete rst, and suggesting resources for help. The last
subtheme was providing general support to athletes (n=14 [17]), with a focus on
being there for those who misuse alcohol and being someone they could turn to.
The nal endorsed role was coach-athlete relationship (n=48 [54]) consisting
of four subthemes. The rst was having trust or being open with athletes (n=24
[25]) by focusing on establishing an environment where they feel comfortable
talking about alcohol use issues. As one coach said, create an environment where
athletes can discuss their use or misuse issues to promote moderate consumption.
The second subtheme was being involved or showing care (n=14 [14]) to create
and maintain close coach-athlete relationships. As one coach stated: get to know
Table 4 (continued)
Third Level
Theme N(MU) Second Level Theme N(MU)
Athlete
management
64 (72) Team culture management 26 (27)
Schedule management 17 (18)
Alternative activities 14 (14)
Selective recruiting 7 (7)
Institutional mental health resource 6 (6)
Perceived Challenges
Environment 69 (79) College alcohol culture 68 (76)
Providing alternate activities 3 (3)
Athlete 68 (75) Inuence athletesattitudes 49 (53)
Individual differences of athletes 19 (22)
Policy 66 (68) Acceptance of policy/Consequences 40 (41)
Deciding/Enforcing policy 27 (27)
Lack of
awareness
33 (34) Being kept in the dark 23 (24)
Not monitoring athletes 24/7 10 (10)
Misuse
identication
31 (31) Supporting athletes not to drink 26 (26)
Identifying signs of misuse 5 (5)
Note. Coach Nfor second level theme does not always equal coach Nfor corresponding third level
theme, as some coaches endorsed multiple second level themes within the third level theme.
JCSP Vol. 13, No. 4, 2019
Coach Managing Alcohol 535
Brought to you by JCSP Board Membership (1/3) | Authenticated gchow@fsu.edu | Downloaded 12/03/19 02:07 PM UTC
the athlete and have a decent background on how to approach that particular
individual when having to deal with issues like alcohol abuse.The third subtheme
involved treating athletes like adults (n=8 [8]), as this allows them to make their
own decisions about alcohol use. The last subtheme involved being approachable
(n=7 [7]). For instance, one coach said that student-athletes should feel com-
fortable reaching out to us in the case that they need us to help them be safe.
What strategies or approaches do you nd to be effective in
preventing or managing alcohol use of your student-athletes?
(N=366)
Responses were coded into 616 stand-alone meaning units (Table 4). Strategies fell
into four third-level themes: policy, education, relationships, and athlete-management.
Five coach responses were coded as other, while six coaches indicated no strategy.
Most endorsed were policy strategies (n=171 [214]), consisting of three
subthemes. The rst was employing alcohol use policies (n=144 [176]) to manage
or prevent athlete alcohol use. This mostly involved setting and communicating
clear expectations with varying degrees of strictness/leniency. One coach stated,
we have a no-drinking policy which has seemed to be effective. If a player is
caught drinking, then he serves a one-year suspension while doing community
service work.The next policy subtheme involved establishing an open and
comfortable environment (n=30 [30]) as a strategy. One coach strives to, create
a culture where athletes are comfortable talking about alcohol use with coaches.
The last subtheme involved exibility (n=7 [8]) by intentionally having fewer or
more uid rules, thereby allowing the coach to intervene on an individual basis. As
one coach stated, I am strong believer in not having too many rules because rules
can paint you into a corner.
Second endorsed were education strategies (n=167 [199]) consisting of ve
subthemes. The rst involved communicating about alcohol use and health (n=81
[88]) by talking directly and openly with individuals or as a group. The second
subtheme involved education about the negative effects that alcohol use has (n=54
[56]) on body, health, academics, and/or athletic performance. The third subtheme
involved general education about alcohol use (n=21 [21]), including safe practices
and appropriate usage. As one coach said, educate the athletes about all aspects
of alcohol use/misuse, and dont sensationalize the information.The fourth
subtheme involved educating athletes about alcohol use through institutional
resources (n=20 [20]), such as campus or athletic department. As one coach
said, our university does a great job with Alcohol Education programs. I just try to
reinforce these.The last subtheme involved the coach sharing personal experi-
ences with alcohol use/abuse (n=13 [14]) as a strategy. As one coach stated, ...I
let them know my story! I only hope it helps them to manage their use of alcohol.
Third endorsed were relationship strategies (n=109 [120]), consisting of six
subthemes. The rst involved empowering athletes to make good decisions (n=59
[59]). As one coach said, I simply let them know the rule and that common sense
will be the ultimate rule. I believe that zero-tolerance policies are destructive and
unrealistic.The second subtheme was establishing open, honest, and trusting
relationships with athletes (n=19 [19]). As one coach suggested, know your
JCSP Vol. 13, No. 4, 2019
536 Chow et al.
Brought to you by JCSP Board Membership (1/3) | Authenticated gchow@fsu.edu | Downloaded 12/03/19 02:07 PM UTC
athletes and let them know they can talk to you about anything. They should also
know that you will talk to them about anything.The third involved being attentive
of athletesalcohol use and looking for signs of abuse (n=17 [17]). The remaining
subthemes were showing care and concern for athletes who need help (n=9 [9]),
being understanding that athletes will consume alcohol and make mistakes
(n=9 [9]), and being a role model that leads by example when it comes to alcohol
use (n=7 [7]).
Fourth endorsed were athlete management strategies (n=64 [72]) consisting
of ve subthemes. The rst was managing team values and culture (n=26 [27]).
One coach mentioned having standards and values that the entire team provides at
the beginning of the year and they live those standards and values. They all have to
be on board.The second subtheme involved managing schedules in a way that
makes alcohol use difcult (n=17 [18]) (e.g., scheduling early morning practices).
The last three subthemes involved directing athletes to alternative dryactivities
(n=14 [14]), selective recruiting of athletes who do not drink or who the coach
deemed as responsible people (n=7 [7]), and utilizing institutional mental health
resources by referring student-athletes when problems arise (n=6 [6]).
What challenges have you experienced, if any, in preventing or
managing alcohol use of your student-athletes? (N=241)
Responses were coded into a total of 288 stand-alone meaning units (Table 4).
Challenges fell into ve third level themes: environment, athlete, policy, lack of
awareness, and misuse identication.
Most endorsed were environment challenges (n=69 [79]) consisting of two
subthemes. Most environmental challenges involved dealing with the culture of
alcohol use on college campuses (n=68 [76]), such as social norms and peer
pressures. The other subtheme involved the challenge of providing athletes with
alternative activities to drinking (n=3 [3]). Coaches endorsing this theme found
it challenging to present athletes with ideas for fun events they could participate in
where alcohol would not be consumed.
Second endorsed were athlete challenges (n=68 [75]), consisting of two
subthemes. The rst involved the challenge of inuencing athletesattitudes and
behaviors regarding alcohol use (n=49 [53]). As one coach stated, I feel that if
athletes want to drink then they will drink, despite our wishes and concerns.The
second subtheme involved the challenge of dealing with individual differences
on the team such as age, culture, background, or levels of maturity (n=19 [22]).
As one coach stated, I am challenged by cultural differences in alcohol use. For
example, I have Europeans on my team who have a much more liberal view of
alcohol use than we do in America.
Third endorsed were policy challenges (n=66 [68]), consisting of two
subthemes. The rst involved the challenge of enforcing policy when it was
violated (n=27 [27]). As one coach said, the challenges always come on the back
end. When they drink too much and get in trouble. Then there must be con-
sequences for their actions. . .removal from the team/school is always hard.The
second subtheme involved the challenge of lack of acceptance or support of
the policy and its consequences on athletes from outside sources (n=40 [41]).
For example, administrators (e.g., athletic department) (n=14 [15]), athletes
JCSP Vol. 13, No. 4, 2019
Coach Managing Alcohol 537
Brought to you by JCSP Board Membership (1/3) | Authenticated gchow@fsu.edu | Downloaded 12/03/19 02:07 PM UTC
(n=14 [14]), or parents (n=12 [12]). As one coach claimed, the challenge I have
is the parents they tolerate it and expect me to tolerate it as well.Another coach
claimed that, school doesnt do much against athletes who are caught. Coaches
have to do everything.
Fourth endorsed were lack of awareness challenges (n=33 [34]), consisting
of two subthemes. The rst was being in the dark (n=23 [24]) in terms of not
knowing how much alcohol their athletes consume, whether alcohol rules are being
broken, not being informed when problems arise, or when athletes get in trouble for
drinking. As one coach stated, student athletes lying seems to be very prominent.
Also, there seems to be a disconnect with the school handling alcohol problems and
making the coaches aware.The other subtheme involved student-athlete moni-
toring challenges (n=10 [10]). That is, not being able to keep track of their student-
athletes at all times. As one coach stated, we cannot be with the athlete 24-7 and
your words only go so far. If an athlete wants to drink, then they will drink.
Last endorsed were misuse identication challenges (n=31 [31]), consisting
of two subthemes. The rst subtheme involved supporting and helping athletes
not to drink (n=26 [26]). Coaches seemed to nd it particularly challenging to
deal with alcohol problems that arise and making the student-athlete understand
that they support them. As one coach stated, the challenge is to make the players
aware that you are here to help them with this and that they shouldnt fear any
repercussions.The second involved the challenge of identifying signs of alcohol
use (n=5 [5]). As one coach stated, athletes could have had substance abuse
issues before even coming to college and we wouldnt know,while another coach
expressed the challenge of identifying the signs if youre not familiar with it.
Discussion
A 3-factor, 27-item measure of coachesattitudes and behaviors toward athlete
drinking was found to havesound factorial validity and psychometric properties. The
three factors (Concerned Communication, Conditional Leniency, and Enforcement)
were consistent with Pitts et al.s(2018) measure of athletesperceptions. Measure-
ment invariance was found for coach gender, team gender, and division. This makes
the Coach Attitudes and Behaviors toward Athlete Alcohol Use Scale ideal to use for
basic and applied research as well as developing intervention programs designed to
change coach attitudes and behaviors.
Qualitative results suggest that many coaches believe they should play a
management role when attempting to regulate alcohol consumption of their
student-athletes. Within this role, coaches indicated that it was their responsibility
to both set and enforce an alcohol use policy or expectations. Although an alcohol
use policy was considered to be the most effective strategy in managing student-
athlete alcohol use, challenges were associated with level of acceptance and ability
to enforce expectations. From a theoretical standpoint, The Social Ecology Model
for Alcohol Use Among College Athletes (Williams et al., 2006) identies
multilevel inuences on student-athlete alcohol use including organizational
factors and policy (McLeroy, Bibeau, Stekler, & Glanz, 1988). Therefore, if a
coach implements an alcohol use policy by setting clear alcohol standards and
regulations for their student-athletes, it would be expected that drinking behavior
JCSP Vol. 13, No. 4, 2019
538 Chow et al.
Brought to you by JCSP Board Membership (1/3) | Authenticated gchow@fsu.edu | Downloaded 12/03/19 02:07 PM UTC
would be controlled. Although many coaches view their role as managing alcohol
use through a policy and believe this to be an effective strategy, there is inconclusive
evidence demonstrating its effectiveness (Pitts et al., 2018;Williams et al., 2008).
While many coaches in the current study utilized an alcohol policy, there was some
disparity between the strictness of these regulations with some setting xed rules,
and others being more lenient. These different approaches to setting and enforcing
policy might help explain the inconsistent results found in previous studies.
Many head coaches believed they should play an educational role in managing
their student-athletesalcohol consumption. This role consisted of teaching athletes
about the consequences of alcohol use, providing general alcohol use information,
teaching responsibility, and educating athletes on how to be healthy. To fulll the
role of an educator, coaches implemented strategies such as communicating with
athletes about alcohol use, providing education about the negative effects of alcohol
use, and sharing their personal experiences with alcohol use or abuse. This is
consistent with the Concerned Communication quantitative dimension. Coaches
who use concerned communication talk with athletes directly about alcohol use, and
emphasize that drinking is inconsistent with athletesgoals and values (Pitts et al.,
2018).
The most common challenge coaches faced when managing student-athletes
alcohol consumption was the culture of alcohol use on college campuses. Research
has found that this culture is inuenced by environmental factors such as housing
where students reside, and the availability of alcohol to students. Students are more
likely to binge drink if they are living in campus housing (Weitzman, Nelson, &
Wechsler, 2003), while lower sales prices and an increased number of promotions
at locations which distribute alcohol around campus are correlated with higher
binge drinking rates on-campus (Kuo, Wechsler, Greenberg, & Lee, 2003). As
these factors are largely outside of coaches control, it is not surprising that none
mentioned trying to manage the college culture as a strategy directly. Coaches,
however, did identify managing the culture within their team as something that was
effective. Other strategies to effectively manage the culture included controlling
athletesschedules in a way that makes alcohol use difcult, and providing
or directing athletes to alternative dryactivities. Furthermore, a few coaches
believed an effective strategy to manage alcohol use was to selectively recruit
student-athletes who do not drink. A noticeable strategy that was not identied was
shaping student-athletesattitudes toward alcohol use. Intrapersonal and interper-
sonal factors, such as student-athletesown attitudes, and attitudes of other student-
athletes have a large inuence on college athlete drinking (Williams et al., 2008).
In the current study, student-athletesattitudes were mentioned as a challenge, but
coaches did not report shaping these attitudes to be a role of theirs, nor did they
mention any strategies to change athletesattitudes towards alcohol use. Future
alcohol management trainings might highlight the importance of student-athlete
attitudes toward alcohol use, while simultaneously preparing coaches to identify
and change maladaptive attitudes.
Limitations and Future Directions
Coaches who volunteered to participate may be more likely to believe that
managing student-athlete alcohol use is their responsibility and that implementing
JCSP Vol. 13, No. 4, 2019
Coach Managing Alcohol 539
Brought to you by JCSP Board Membership (1/3) | Authenticated gchow@fsu.edu | Downloaded 12/03/19 02:07 PM UTC
effective strategies is important representing a limitation related to self-selection
bias. Although a large sample of coaches was obtained, coaches less concerned
about this issue may have been less likely to participate in the study. Furthermore,
this study yielded a 10% response rate of the 5,183 coaches who were initially
contacted via email, which is consistent with large sample studies that distributed
surveys via email (Grifs, Goldsby, & Cooper, 2011;Kim, Gerber, Patel,
Hollowell, & Bales, 2001), however, this may bring into question the representa-
tiveness of the sample. Another limitation was that qualitative data in this study
were obtained using open-ended questions in which participants typed their
response. While this method allowed us to obtain a large sample size, future
research investigating coachesmanagement of alcohol use of their student-
athletes could include semi-structured interviews to gain a more in-depth under-
standing behind coachesresponses. For example, since coaches believed it was
their role to set an alcohol use policy and believed this was an effective strategy,
future studies should be conducted to gain a deeper view as to what type of policies
coaches are setting (e.g., differences in outcomes between coaches who set strict
policies and those who adopt a more exible approach). Further studies should
include coaches from fall sports such as football, soccer, and volleyball to gain a
more comprehensive perspective.
Future research investigating coachesmanagement of alcohol use amongst
student-athletes might benet from the development of quantitative measures of
alcohol literacy similar to those used to measure mental health literacy (OConnor
& Casey, 2015). This would not only provide a quantitative way to measure
coachesknowledge about student-athlete alcohol use, but would also supplement
the attitudes and behaviors scale employed in the current study, as an assessment of
the effectiveness of interventions aimed at coaches. Lastly, future research should
address the role of sport psychology professionals in educating and training
coaches and athletes about alcohol use and misuse.
Practical Implications
Coaches can be instrumental in helping to address the culture of alcohol consump-
tion among student-athletes on college campuses, but only if they are sufciently
educated and trained. Programs must be based on ndings from sound research,
which is currently scarce. This may explain why many college coaches believe that
alcohol training is ineffective and ultimately why they lack the knowledge and
ability to adequately address student-athlete alcohol use (Nolt et al., 2013). Sport
psychology professionals who are competent in alcohol use issues and understand
the culture of sport can use the ndings from this study to develop programs to
prepare coaches to address student-athlete alcohol use and misuse. For example, the
derived coachesattitudes and behaviors dimensions and items can be targeted for
intervention, especially because these dimensions have been found to predict athlete
alcohol use and excessive drinking (Pitts et al., 2018). As many of the qualitative
ndings regarding effective strategies were similar to the subscales of the quantita-
tive measure, sport psychology professionals can teach and train coaches on how
to use these. Although prevention programs targeting student-athletes have been
shown to be effective, educating and training coaches may offer greater utility and
represents a cost-effective strategy for sport psychology professionals and athletics
JCSP Vol. 13, No. 4, 2019
540 Chow et al.
Brought to you by JCSP Board Membership (1/3) | Authenticated gchow@fsu.edu | Downloaded 12/03/19 02:07 PM UTC
departments. This is because collegiate coaches have considerable inuence
and frequent interactions with their athletes throughout the year; thus having the
capacity to inuence hundreds to thousands of athletes during their coaching
careers. Preparing coaches to manage athlete alcohol consumption is essential for
positively impacting student-athlete psychosocial well-being and mental health.
References
Biggin, I.J., Burns, J.H., & Uphill, M. (2017). An investigation of athletesand coaches
perceptions of mental ill-health in elite athletes. Journal of Clinical Sport Psychology,
11, 126147. doi:10.1123/jcsp.2016-0017
Brenner, J., & Swanik, K. (2007). High-risk drinking characteristics in collegiate athletes.
Journal of American College Health, 56, 267272. PubMed ID: 18089508 doi:10.
3200/JACH.56.3.267-272
Côté, J., Salmela, J.H., Baria, A., & Russell, S.J. (1993). Organizing and interpreting
unstructured qualitative data. The Sport Psychologist, 7, 127137. doi:10.1123/tsp.
7.2.127
Ferguson, H.L., Swann, C., Liddle, S.J., & Vella, S.A. (2019). Investigating youth
sports coachesperceptions of their role in adolescent mental health. Journal of
Applied Sport Psychology.31, 235252. doi:10.1080/10413200.2018.1466839
Grifs, S.E., Goldsby, T.J., & Cooper, M. (2011). Web-based and mail surveys:
A comparison of response, data, and cost. Journal of Business Logistics, 24, 237258.
doi:10.1002/j.2158-1592.2003.tb00053.x
Hahs-Vaughn, D.L. (2005). A primer for using and understanding weights with national
datasets. The Journal of Experimental Education, 73, 221248. doi:10.3200/JEXE.73.
3.221-248
Hainline, B., Bell, L., & Wilfert, M. (2014). Substance use and abuse. In Mind, body and
sport: Understanding and supporting student-athlete mental wellness (pp. 4045).
NCAA: Indianapolis, IN.
Jowett, S. (2005). The coach-athlete partnership. The Psychologist, 18, 412415.
Kim, H.L., Gerber, G.S., Patel, R.V., Hollowell, C.M., & Bales, G.T. (2001). Practice
patterns in the treatment of female urinary incontinence: A postal and internet survey.
Urology, 57, 4548. PubMed ID: 11164141 doi:10.1016/S0090-4295(00)00885-2
Kuo, M., Wechsler, H., Greenberg, P., & Lee, H. (2003). The marketing of alcohol to college
students: The role of low prices and special promotions. American Journal of
Preventive Medicine, 25, 204211. PubMed ID: 14507526 doi:10.1016/S0749-
3797(03)00200-9
Martens, M.P., Dams-OConnor, K., & Beck, N.C. (2006). A systematic review of college
student-athlete drinking: Prevalence rates, sport-related factors, and interventions.
Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 31, 305316. PubMed ID: 16996393 doi:10.
1016/j.jsat.2006.05.004
Mastroleo, N.R., Marzell, M., Turrisi, R., & Borsari, B. (2012). Do coaches make a
difference off the eld? The examination of athletic coach inuence on early college
student drinking. Addiction Research & Theory, 20, 6471. PubMed ID: 24639626
doi:10.3109/16066359.2011.562621
McDonald, R.P. (1999). Test theory: A unied approach. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
McLeroy, K.R., Bibeau, D., Steckler, A., & Glanz, K. (1988). An ecological perspective on
health promotion programs. Health Education Quarterly, 15, 351377. PubMed ID:
3068205 doi:10.1177/109019818801500401
National Collegiate Athletic Association. (2018). NCAA national study on substance use
habits of college student-athletes. Indianapolis, IN: Author.
JCSP Vol. 13, No. 4, 2019
Coach Managing Alcohol 541
Brought to you by JCSP Board Membership (1/3) | Authenticated gchow@fsu.edu | Downloaded 12/03/19 02:07 PM UTC
Nolt, K.L., Sachs, M.L., & Brenner, J.W. (2013). The effects of collegiate head coaches
knowledge and attitudes toward alcohol consumption by student-athletes. Journal of
Multidisciplinary Research, 5, 716.
OConnor, M., & Casey, L. (2015). The Mental Health Literacy Scale (MHLS): A new
scale-based measure of mental health literacy. Psychiatry Research, 229, 511516.
doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2015.05.064
Pierce, D., Liaw, S.T., Dobell, J., & Anderson, R. (2010). Australian rural football club
leaders as mental health advocates: An investigation of the impact of the coach the
coach project. International Journal of Mental Health Systems, 4, 10. PubMed ID:
20482809 doi:10.1186/1752-4458-4-10
Pitts, M., Chow, G.M., & Yang, Y. (2018). Athletesperceptions of their head coachs
alcohol management strategies and athlete alcohol use. Addiction Research & Theory,
26, 174182. doi:10.1080/16066359.2017.1341976
Rice, S.M., Purcell, R., De Silva, S., Mawren, D., McGorry, P.D., & Parker, A.G. (2016).
The mental health of elite athletes: A narrative systematic review. Sports Medicine, 46,
13331353. PubMed ID: 26896951 doi:10.1007/s40279-016-0492-2
Seitz, C.M., Wyrick, D.L., Rulison, K.L., Strack, R.W., & Fearnow-Kenney, M. (2014). The
association between coach and teammate injunctive norm reference groups and college
student-athlete substance use. Journal of Alcohol and Drug Education, 58, 726.
Shanmugam, V., Jowett, S., & Meyer, C. (2013). Eating psychopathology amongst athletes:
The importance of relationships with parents, coaches and teammates. International
Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 11, 2438. doi:10.1080/1612197X.2012.
724197
Slater, M.J., Coffee, P., Barker, J.B., & Evans, A.L. (2014). Promoting shared meanings in
group memberships: A social identity approach to leadership in sport. Reective
Practice, 15, 672685. doi:10.1080/14623943.2014.944126
Thompson, R.A., & Sherman, R.T. (2007). Managing student-athletesmental health
issues. Indianapolis, IN: National Collegiate Athletic Association.
Weitzman, E.R., Nelson, T.F., & Wechsler, H. (2003). Taking up binge drinking in college:
The inuences of person, social group, and environment. Journal of Adolescent Health,
32, 2635. PubMed ID: 12507798 doi:10.1016/S1054-139X(02)00457-3
Williams, R.D., Jr., Perko, M.A., Belcher, D., & Leaver-Dunn, D.D. (2006). Use of social
ecology model to address alcohol use among college athletes. American Journal of
Health Studies, 21, 228237.
Williams, R.D., Jr., Perko, M.A., Usdan, S.L., Leeper, J.D., Belcher, D., & Leaver-Dunn,
D.D. (2008). Inuences on alcohol use among NCAA athletes: Application of the
social ecology model. American Journal of Health Studies, 23, 151159.
Wyrick, D.L., Wilfert, M., Milroy, J.J., & Burley, J. (2013). Coaches assist: A substance
abuse resources of NCAA coaches. Talk presented at the meeting of the APPLE
Conference; Charlottesville, VA.
Zhou, J., & Heim, D. (2014). Sports and spirits: A systematic qualitative review of emergent
theories for student-athlete drinking. Alcohol and Alcoholism, 49, 604617. PubMed
ID: 25249539 doi:10.1093/alcalc/agu061
Zhou, J., & Heim, D. (2016). A qualitative exploration of alcohol use among student
sportspeople: A social identity perspective. European Journal of Social Psychology,
46, 581594. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2195
JCSP Vol. 13, No. 4, 2019
542 Chow et al.
Brought to you by JCSP Board Membership (1/3) | Authenticated gchow@fsu.edu | Downloaded 12/03/19 02:07 PM UTC
... The undergraduate non-athlete ARUI prevalence was 11.7%. The prevalence and risk of ARUI, including how it can impact one's current and future sport participation, must be included in prevention education for collegiate athletes and athletic personnel (Chow et al., 2019;Parisi et al., 2019). ...
... Collegiate athletes who suffered an ARUI were more likely to have reported frequent participation in drinking games, not pacing drinks to one per hour, not using a designated driver, and mixing different kinds of alcohol. The inclusion of protective health behaviors when drinking seems to be of critical importance to a prevention education intervention for collegiate athletes, but also for coaches, athletic trainers, and other athletic department staff (Chow et al., 2019;Parisi et al., 2019). ...
... Screening collegiate athletes for mental health and substance abuse indicators may provide significant opportunity for intervention and referral, as well as harm reduction Daltry, Mehr, & Keenan, 2021). There seems to be strong support for educating and training collegiate coaches, athletic trainers, and other athletic personnel in the areas of prevention, identification/screening, and referral for student athletes who may be at risk for ARUI, as well as the associated predictors and correlates Chow et al., 2019;Daltry, Mehr, & Keenan, 2021;Nolt, Sachs, & Brenner, 2013;Parisi et al., 2019). A limitation of this study is the results were not aggregated by gender and type of sport, which could influence the selection of relevant interventions for individual teams, especially when the research suggests that collegiate athletes who drink alcohol are not homogeneous regarding HED and the negative consequences (Zamboanga et al., 2021). ...
Article
Full-text available
According to the Center for Disease Control (CDC), approximately one-fifth of U.S. deaths are related to cigarette smoking. However, the CDC also reports that those who quit smoking before the age of 40 can reduce their risk of dying from a smoking-related disease by 90%. In this study, we used a multiple-baseline design across participants to demonstrate a self-management strategy to reduce smoking in three males aged 35–38 years. The results indicated that smoking was decreased after treatment. One participant quit smoking. Cognitive behavioral methods such as self-monitoring based on self-selected reinforcers can decrease smoking behaviors in naturalistic settings. However, further research is needed to evaluate the sustainability of outcomes. Keywords: smoking cessation; self-management; reinforcement; goal setting; descriptive assessment
... Researchers have examined coaches' CAR perceptions with their provision of a wide variety of skill development opportunities for athletes in and out of the sport context (Bissett & Tamminen, 2022;Camiré et al., 2019;Chow et al., 2019;White & Bennie, 2015), as well as with athletes' performance and satisfaction (Davis et al., 2013;Gucciardi et al., 2009;Moen, 2012;Sánchez et al., 2009). For instance, U.S. collegiate coaches reported having strong relationships with their players was one strategy they used to help manage and prevent their athletes' alcohol consumption (Chow et al., 2019). ...
... Researchers have examined coaches' CAR perceptions with their provision of a wide variety of skill development opportunities for athletes in and out of the sport context (Bissett & Tamminen, 2022;Camiré et al., 2019;Chow et al., 2019;White & Bennie, 2015), as well as with athletes' performance and satisfaction (Davis et al., 2013;Gucciardi et al., 2009;Moen, 2012;Sánchez et al., 2009). For instance, U.S. collegiate coaches reported having strong relationships with their players was one strategy they used to help manage and prevent their athletes' alcohol consumption (Chow et al., 2019). In addition, researchers found collegiate coaches believed the higher quality their CARs, the more likely their athletes would be to disclose about psychological distress they experienced (Bissett & Tamminen, 2022). ...
... The coaches' CAR subscales of closeness and commitment have been positively related to the use of positive feedback (r = .31-.34). Qualitative researchers found coaches who displayed the behaviors of being approachable with their players were more likely to report higher CARs (Bennie & Connor, 2012;Chow et al., 2019). Interviews with professional coaches revealed that they attributed approachability and having an opendoor policy with athletes to their having high-quality CARs (Bennie & Connor, 2012). ...
Article
The purpose of this study was to systematically review the variables associated with the coach–athlete relationship (CAR) from the coaches’ perspective. Three databases were searched; 57 studies published between January 2000 and May 2021 met the inclusion criteria. Correlates ( n = 35) were grouped into three categories: coach variables, athlete variables, and coaching behaviors. Variables positively associated with the coaches’ perspective of the CAR included coaching satisfaction, the teaching of life skills, and engaging in need-supportive behaviors. Negative correlates included coaching burnout, athletes’ avoidant attachment style, and coaches’ controlling behaviors. Aside from coach satisfaction, many of the relationships mentioned came from only one or two studies; therefore, replication studies are needed examining CAR from the coaches’ perspective. In conclusion, the better coaches report CAR to be, the more they also report fostering a caring and autonomy-supportive environment, teaching life skills, and being satisfied with their coaching experience.
... Moreover, athletes themselves may suffer negative effects, as alcohol consumption by athletes can increase the risk of maladaptive behaviors by the individual. Recent research has emphasized the important role that coaches play in the prevention and management of student-athlete alcohol misuse (Chow, Bird, Soendergaard, & Yang, 2019;Pitts, Chow, & Yang, 2018). While there are increased expectations for coaches to manage the mental health and drinking behaviors of their student-athletes, this group has reported challenges performing this role. ...
... Formal alcohol use education/training and improved alcohol consumption literacy are not mutually exclusive. For example, it is possible for coaches to gain alcohol literacy and educate student-athletes by using their life experiences, such as prior alcohol use treatment, or knowing someone who has misused alcohol (Chow et al., 2019). Results from the regression analysis show alcohol literacy to predict all five alcohol confrontation efficacy subscales while accounting for previous education/ training and gender of team coached, with the percentage variance explained ranging from 15% to 22%. ...
Article
Full-text available
The rate of alcohol consumption among student-athletes places them at risk for engaging in unsafe behaviors. Although coaches play a key role in regulating alcohol use among athletes, many lack the knowledge and self-confidence to be effective. This study aimed to examine the relationship between alcohol consumption literacy and alcohol confrontation efficacy among NCAA head coaches and attempted to identify types of training and education wanted to better manage student-athlete alcohol use. A total of 518 NCAA head coaches completed alcohol consumption literacy and alcohol confrontation efficacy measures and two open-ended questions about what kind of alcohol training, information, and skills were needed. When accounting for previous education/training and gender of team coached, alcohol consumption literacy predicted all confrontation efficacy subscales. Content analysis showed coaches wanted training related to alcohol literacy, effective communication, and prevention planning. Findings have implications for designing alcohol prevention and intervention programs aimed at NCAA coaches.
Article
Full-text available
Excessive alcohol use, especially binge and heavy drinking, represents a serious threat to force readiness across the Department of Defense. Though these behaviors are a matter of individual service member choice, they are influenced by perceptions of the culture of alcohol use in the military. This paper uses data from the 2018 Health Related Behaviors Survey of Active Duty service members to explore associations between perceived alcohol culture and excessive alcohol use, any serious drinking consequences, risky driving behaviors, productivity loss due to drinking, absenteeism, and presenteeism. Results from multivariate logistic regression reveal a strong, positive correlation between positive perceptions of drinking culture in the military and all outcomes. Targeting perceptions of the drinking culture is one way the military can reduce excessive and unhealthy use of alcohol and negative sequelae.
Article
Full-text available
Background The physical impacts of elite sport participation have been well documented; however, there is comparatively less research on the mental health and psychological wellbeing of elite athletes. Objective This review appraises the evidence base regarding the mental health and wellbeing of elite-level athletes, including the incidence and/or nature of mental ill-health and substance use. Methods A systematic search of the PubMed, EMBASE, SPORTDiscus, PsycINFO, Cochrane and Google Scholar databases, up to and including May 2015, was conducted. Results The search yielded a total of 2279 records. Following double screening, 60 studies were included. The findings suggested that elite athletes experience a broadly comparable risk of high-prevalence mental disorders (i.e. anxiety, depression) relative to the general population. Evidence regarding other mental health domains (i.e. eating disorders, substance use, stress and coping) is less consistent. These results are prefaced, however, by the outcome of the quality assessment of the included studies, which demonstrated that relatively few studies (25 %) were well reported or methodologically rigorous. Furthermore, there is a lack of intervention-based research on this topic. Conclusion The evidence base regarding the mental health and wellbeing of elite athletes is limited by a paucity of high-quality, systematic studies. Nonetheless, the research demonstrates that this population is vulnerable to a range of mental health problems (including substance misuse), which may be related to both sporting factors (e.g. injury, overtraining and burnout) and non-sporting factors. More high-quality epidemiological and intervention studies are needed to inform optimal strategies to identify and respond to player mental health needs.
Article
Full-text available
THE Society’s ‘Year of Relationships’ is a piece of good fortune for researchers and practitioners like me, providing a unique opportunity to showcase an exciting and expanding field within psychology. In a sport context there are many personal relationships (e.g. coach–parent, athlete–athlete, athlete–partner) that can impact on performance, but the coach–athlete relationship is considered to be particularly crucial (Jowett & Cockerill, 2002; Lyle, 1999). THE Society’s ‘Year of Relationships’ is a piece of good fortune for researchers and practitioners like me, providing a unique opportunity to showcase an exciting and expanding field within psychology. In a sport context there are many personal relationships (e.g. coach–parent, athlete–athlete, athlete–partner) that can impact on performance, but the coach–athlete relationship is considered to be particularly crucial (Jowett & Cockerill, 2002; Lyle, 1999). The coach–athlete relationship is not an add-on to, or by-product of, the coaching process, nor is it based on the athlete’s performance, age or gender – instead it is the foundation of coaching. The coach and the athlete intentionally develop a relationship, which is characterised by a growing appreciation and respect for each other as individuals. Overall, the coach–athlete relationship is embedded in the dynamic and complex coaching process and provides the means by which coaches’ and athletes’ needs are expressed and fulfilled (Jowett & Cockerill, 2002). It is at the heart of achievement and the mastery of personal qualities such as leadership, determination, confidence and self-reliance. This article aims to offer a perspective on the coach–athlete relationship and show how sport psychology can contribute to the study of relationships whilst learning from, and building on, the work of scholars in social and relationship psychology.
Article
Full-text available
The purpose of this study was to measure influences of college athlete alcohol consumption through application of the Social Ecology Model of health behaviors. A non-random sample (n=230) of college athletes from an NCAA institution was surveyed regarding alcohol use and influences on consumption. The most significant social ecological predictors of alcohol consumption were personal beliefs, perceptions of teammates use, and perceptions of overall campus use. Alcohol rules of coaches and athletic departments had no impact on athletes' alcohol behavior. Identifying the ecological influences of college athlete alcohol use assists in the development of appropriate intervention and prevention programs.
Article
Coaches play an important role in the lives of adolescents in sport and have the potential to greatly impact on athlete mental health. This study aimed to investigate coaches’ perceptions of their role in supporting adolescent mental health. Twenty coaches participated in five focus groups. Results revealed that coaches perceive their role to be diverse and inclusive of the promotion of mental health. Some believed they have a role in facilitating professional help seeking but were not adequately trained in the area of mental health. We present recommendations regarding the tailoring of mental health literacy training for youth sport coaches.
Article
Despite evidence regarding the salience of team-related antecedents of student-athlete drinking, less research has focused on the role coaches play in managing their athletes’ alcohol consumption. We examined the influence of athletes’ perceptions of coach attitudes and behaviors about athlete alcohol use on athlete alcohol use. Collegiate female softball athletes (N = 897) from 63 NCAA teams were surveyed during the competitive season. A measure to assess athletes’ evaluations of head coach attitudes and behaviors toward athlete drinking was developed by generating a pool of items based on the student-athlete alcohol use literature and interviews with six NCAA coaches, and subsequently examining its factor structure. An exploratory factor analysis indicated three factors: Concerned Communication, Conditional Leniency, and Enforcement. Athlete alcohol consumption was measured, including frequency of use and heavy episodic drinking. Multilevel modeling results revealed that higher concerned communication and lower conditional leniency were associated with less athlete alcohol use. Enforcement was unrelated to alcohol use. Findings demonstrate the impact of coaches on athletes’ alcohol use. Commensurate education and training should be provided for coaches to prevent and manage athlete alcohol consumption.
Article
Research suggests elite athletes have an equal—or, in some circumstances, possibly higher—probability of developing mental ill-health as the general population. However, understanding of these issues among athletes and coaches remains largely limited. The perceptions of mental-health problems among 19 elite athletes and 16 coaches were explored using two concurrent three-round Delphi surveys whose responses were compared. Athletes and coaches expressed different opinions and experiences of mental ill-health among elite athletes. However, both groups felt the pressure athletes place on themselves is a significant contributing factor and that obsessional compulsive tendencies and anxiety may be particularly prevalent. While associated stigma was thought to be a barrier to seeking support, both groups felt sport and clinical psychologists would provide the most appropriate support, with coaches playing an important signposting role. Implications for athletes, coaches, and clinical and sport psychologists are explored and suggestions for future research are presented.
Article
Research indicates that university student sportspeople are a high-risk subgroup for hazardous alcohol consumption. Adopting a social identity perspective, we explored the social and psychological processes linking sports participation and alcohol use. Twenty-two individual semi-structured interviews were conducted with UK student sportspeople (male 12, female 10). A deductive thematic analysis identified three core themes: social identification and sports group membership, identity processes in (alcohol) behaviours, and sport context-specific significance of alcohol. Results suggest that the consumptive practices among student sportspeople were strategic activities underpinned by social identity processes, and which served to provide a positive sports experience at the group level. Our findings highlight the interactions between the sport environment, the social structure of sport participation, and the multipurpose function of alcohol in this context. We discuss the implications of these results in support of a social identity approach to sport-related drinking.
Article
Although Mental Health Literacy (MHL) has been a topic of substantial interest, measurement of this concept using a scale-based measure has been limited, including a lack of psychometric and methodologically robust scale-based measures of MHL. This study developed a new scale-based measure of MHL, the Mental Health Literacy Scale (MHLS), which assesses all attributes of MHL. Construction of the MHLS was done over three key stages, including measure development, pilot testing and assessment of psychometrics and methodological quality. The resulting measure is a 35 item, univariate scale that is easily administered and scored. Results showed significant differences in scores between mental health professionals and a community sample, as well as individuals with greater experience with mental health, and a significant positive relationship with help-seeking intentions. The MHLS also demonstrated good internal and test-retest reliability. Evaluation of the methodological quality of the MHLS indicated that it has substantial methodological advantages in comparison to existing scale-based measures of MHL. The MHLS can be used in assessing individual and population level differences in MHL and in determining the impact of programmes designed to improve MHL. Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.