Life Cycle of Vermicomposting Earthworms Eisenia fetida and Eudrilus eugeniae Under Laboratory Controlled Condition

Full text

Volume 5- Issue 4: 2018
1/4
ISSN: 2574-1241
DOI: 10.26717/BJSTR.2018.10.002015
Ali S.
Biomed J Sci & Tech Res
Research Article
Biomedical Journal of

Open Access
Introduction
Earthworms are macroscopic clitellate oligochaete annelids
that live in soil. They are segmented worms, bilaterally symmetrical,
with an external gland (clitellum) for producing the egg case
(cocoon), a sensory lobe in front of the mouth (prostomium),
and an anus at the end of the animal body, with a small number
of bristles (setae) on each segment. They are hermaphrodite
animals, and reproduction normally occurs through copulation and
cross-fertilization, following which each of the mated individuals
produces cocoons containing 1-20 fertilized ova. The resistant
cocoons, which are tiny and roughly lemon-shaped, with shape
differing between species, are usually deposited near the soil
surface, except in dry weather when they are laid at deeper layers.
Cocoons hatch after an incubation period that varies according to
the earthworm species and environmental conditions. Hatchling
earthworms, unpigmented and only a few millimeters in length on
emerging from the cocoons, gain their adult pigmentation within
a few days. Assuming favorable conditions, they reach sexual
maturity within several weeks after emergence.
Mature individuals of most vermicomposting species can
be distinguished easily by the presence of the clitellum, the pale
or dark colored swollen band located behind the genital pores.
         
         
Earthworms display indeterminate growth and can continue to
grow in size after completing their sexual development although
they do not add segments. According to Reynolds and Wetzel [1],
there are more than 8300 species in the Oligochaeta, of which
about half are terrestrial earthworms. On the basis of their feeding
and burrowing strategies, into three ecological categories: epigeic,
anecic, and endogeic [2]. Endogeic (soil feeders) and anecic species
(burrowers) live in the soil and consume a mixture of soil and
organic matter, and thus excrete organomineral feces. Epigeic
species of earthworms are litter dwellers and litter transformers;
they live in organic soil horizons, in or near the surface litter, and
feed primarily on coarse particulate organic matter.
Life Cycle of Vermicomposting Earthworms
Eisenia Fetida and Eudrilus Eugeniae Under
Laboratory Controlled Condition
Ali S* and Kashem MA
Department of Soil Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Bangladesh
Received: : October 25, 2018; Published: : November 08, 2018
*Corresponding author: Ali S, Department of Soil Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Bangladesh
Abstract
     
vermicomposting earthworms (Eisenia fetida and Eudrilus eugeniae) at the lab Department of Soil Science during 15 February to 10 June 2018.
Determination of cocoon production rate, hatching success, number of hatchling and growth of Eisenia fetida and Eudrilus eugeniae in the cowdung
media was conducted with plastic containers. The experiment was designed under the single treatment cowdung with three replications. Clitellum
development started earlier in 3rd week of Eisenia fetida than Eudrilus eugeniae (4th week). Number of cocoons produced per earthworm (21.8±3.0),
mean number of hatchlings from one cocoon (3.3±0.57), hatching success rate (86.6%) was recorded higher of Eisenia fetida.
Cocoon production of E. fetida was started to release cocoon on the 6th week and Eudrilus eugeniae was started to release cocoon on the 7th week.
Cocoon production ceased after 12 week for Eisenia fetida and 9 week Eudrilus eugeniae. Maximum weights achieved per earthworm (1116±16.4
mg), net weight gain per earthworm (819±12 mg), growth rate per worm per day (17.43±1.4 mg) were higher in Eudrilus eugeniae comparison to
Eisenia fetida. The overall result of this study showed that better hatching success of cocoons and number of hatchling per cocoon were recorded by
Eisenia fetida earthworm species.
Keywords: Eisenia Fetida; Eudrilus Eugeniae; Earthworms; Life Cycle


Cite this article: Ali S, Kashem MA. Life Cycle of Vermicomposting Earthworms Eisenia Fetida and Eudrilus Eugeniae Under Laboratory Con-
trolled Condition. Biomed J Sci&Tech Res 10(5)-2018. BJSTR. MS.ID.002015. DOI: 10.26717/ BJSTR.2018.10.002015. 2/4
Volume 10- Issue 5: 2018
They ingest large amounts of under composed litter and excrete
holorganic fecal pellets. These species are small in body size and
uniformly pigmented with high metabolic and reproductive rates,
which represent adaptations to the highly variable environmental
conditions at the soil surface. Different species of earthworms have
different life histories, occupy different ecological niches. Loh et al.
[3] reported higher cocoon production and weight gain by E. fetida
in cattle waste than in goat waste. Gunadi et al. [4] have studied
growth, reproduction, and mortality of E. foetida for over a year in
solid manure, pig manure, and supermarket waste solids. Worms
could not survive in fresh cattle solids, pig solids, fruit wastes, or
vegetable wastes. The growth of E. foetida in pig wastes was faster
than in cattle solids. Understanding the growth and reproductive

essential for effective utilization of earthworms in sustainable
waste management system [5-6].
As huge amount of wastes can be managed through more
population of earthworms [7] reproductive and growth
performance of various species of earthworms in a range of
     
of an earthworm species in vermicomposting or earthworm based
biotechnology [8]. Neuhauser et al. [9] have reported that the
weight gain by Eisenia fetida is positively correlated with food type.
Similarly, Nath et al. [10,11] have also described substrates that

organic matter, facilitate growth and reproduction. Hence, in the
present study, to see the growth, reproductive biology and life cycle
of the vermicomposting earthworms.
Material and Methods
Life cycle experiments were carried out in the lab Department
of Soil Science with average room temperature of 21-28°C and 60 to
80% moisture of the culture media during 15 February to 10 June
2018. For moisture determination, the sample substrates were
taken regularly (at 3 days interval) weighed, oven dried at 105°C
and cooled in desiccators for 1 hr and reweighed. The difference
between moist and dried samples were taken and then the moisture
content of beddings was adjusted to 60 to 80% and the temperature
was kept within the range of 21-28°C throughout the study period
[12]. In this experiment was designated as single treatment and
two earthworm species (Eisenia fetida and Eudrilus eugeniae) with
      
in the container. Twenty each earthworm species having individual
live weight (225 mg of Eisenia fetida and 284 mg of Eudrilus
eugeniae) were released into each experimental container.

Five hatchlings of earthworm species in good health condition
were taken from the above containers for reproductive potential
determination. The hatchlings were rinsed with distilled water to

        
experimental container. Three replicates were established.
To monitor the growth and maturation progress weekly, the
biomass was measured in batch of earthworm in each container
and three phases of the life cycle were observed, Pre-clitelleate
      
of tuber culapubertasis), clitelleate (well-developed clitellum) and

production date for each worm was also determined. No additional
feed was added at any stage during the study period. On the basis
of the obtained data on the biomass of the worms other parameters
of earthworm such as growth rate or biomass increase rate (g/
earthworm/day), maximum weight achieved, and net weight gain
were calculated.
    

The experiments were conducted in cylindrical plastic

the feeding rate explanation of [13]. Three replicates were prepared
for each substrate and worm combination. Two freshly clitellated
species, in good health condition, were collected from the stock
culture and rinsed with distilled water to remove any adhering
        
        
substrate in treatment container was examined daily in order
to determine the onset of cocoon production. Once the cocoons
appeared, they were separated by hand sorting, washed lightly
in distilled water and counted so as to determine total number of
cocoon and the fecundity or reproductive rate (cocoon/worm/day).
      

To determine the incubation period (time lapse from cocoon

(total number of hatched cocoons), and number of hatchlings per
        
from the above containers and placed in containers which contained
the same material in which their parents were reared. Three
replicates were prepared. The beddings were observed daily for
the emergence of hatchlings in order to determine the incubation
period. As soon as the appearance of hatchling started, they were
          
sorting in order to determine the total number of hatchlings that
emerged from a single cocoon. The number of unhatched cocoons
was also counted in order to determine the hatching success of
cocoons.
Results and Discussion
Growth Rate of Earthworm Species
The growth rate of two earthworm species in investigating
during the study period is given in Table 1. The biomass of
earthworm species showed progressive raise up to 6th week in E.
fetida and 7th week in E. eugeniae. In E. fetida where maximum
growth attained, E. fetida achieved their maximum weight achieved
889±90 mg/worm at a growth rate of 16.3±0.52 mg/worm/day in
the 6th week. In E. eugeniae where maximum growth attained, E.

 Volume 10- Issue 5: 2018
Cite this article: Ali S, Kashem MA. Life Cycle of Vermicomposting Earthworms Eisenia Fetida and Eudrilus Eugeniae Under Laboratory Con-
trolled Condition. Biomed J Sci&Tech Res 10(5)-2018. BJSTR. MS.ID.002015. DOI: 10.26717/ BJSTR.2018.10.002015. 3/4
eugeniae achieved their maximum weight achieved 1116±16.4 mg/
worm at a growth rate of 17.43±1.4 mg/worm/day in the 7th week.
Regarding the sexual maturity (clitellum development), E. fetida
was preclitelated on the second week and mature individual with
clitellum totally developed started to emerge on the 3rd week and E.
eugeniae was developed in 4th week of this experiment.
Table 1: Growth parameters of two earthworm species.
Earthworm
species
Initial weight/

Maximum
weight achieved/

Maximum weight
achieved on
Net weight gain/

Growth rate/

Clitellum
development
started in
Eisenia fetida 196±69 889±90 6th week 686±22 16.3±0.52 3rd week
Eudrilus eugeniae 297±4.1 1116±16.4 7th week 819±12 17.43±1.4 4th week
Note: All values were introduced as the mean ± SD (standard deviation).
Edwards et al. [14] and Monroy et al. [15] also reported that
rapid pre-reproductive phase of growth, followed by a phase of
progressive biomass and growth reduction once sexual maturity
was attained. These losses in worm biomass might be associated
with the exhaustion of food. As supported by [9] who reported
that when E. fetida received food below a maintenance level, it
lost weight. The weight reduction was also occurred because
the earthworms attained the matured stage. So, they utilized the
energy for reproduction purpose such as laying eggs, mating and
cocoon formation [6]. Reinecke et al. [16] reported a maximum
weight gain for E. eugeniae of 150 mg per week, at 25°C. Hait and
  
earthworm by modifying metabolic activity.
Table 2: Rate of cocoon production by two earthworm species.
Earthworm
species
Cocoon production
started in

cocoons produced
No. of cocoons
produced/ earthworm
No. of cocoons produced/
earthworm/day
Cocoon production
ceased after
Eisenia fetida 6th week
109±14.9
(12 weeks)
21.8±3.0 0.39±0.05 12th week
Eudrilus eugeniae 7th week
1016±31
(9 weeks)
12.61±1.0 0.21 ± 0.07 9th week
Note: All values were introduced as the mean ± SD (standard deviation).
Rate of Cocoon Production by Earthworm Species
In this experiment, E. fetida was started to release cocoon on
the 4th week and Eudrilus eugeniae was started to release cocoon
on the 5th week (Table 2). The highest total number of cocoon was
attained in Eudrilus eugeniae (1016±31 cocoons at a reproduction
rate of 0.21 ± 0.07 cocoon/earthworm/day) at 9 weeks and E.
fetida (109 ± 14.9 cocoons at cocoon production rate of 0.39±0.05
cocoon/earthworm/day) was recorded in this study. Cocoon
production ceased after 12th week of Eisenia fetida and Eudrilus
eugeniae cocoon production was ceased in 9th week. Giraddi et al.
[18] who reported that better hatching success of cocoons that
indicate the cocoon viability. E. eugeniae reached sexual maturity in

  
that E. eugeniae started producing cocoons after 46 days. This is
a shorter time than the 6-8 weeks previously quoted for E. fetida
[20], and the 51 days reported for E. eugeniae [21].

by Earthworm Species
The incubation period range of two earthworm species were
completed in 18-26 days of Eisenia fetida and 12-21 days of
Eudrilus eugeniae. The mean number of hatchlings from one cocoon
was 3.3±0.57 in Eisenia fetida which comparison 2.23 ± 0.18 in
Eudrilus eugeniae. The cocoons produced generally demonstrated
good hatching performance in Eisenia fetida (86.6%) than Eudrilus
eugeniae (75.3%) (Table 3). Shalabi [22] who reported that the
average standard time taken to reach sexual maturity for E. fetida
was about 70 days. The result also varied from the result of Venter et
al. [23] who recorded 60 days for E. fetida to reach sexual maturity.
Table 3: Incubation period and hatching performance of cocoons by two earthworm species.
Earthworm  Number of hatchlings from one
cocoon
Mean number of hatchlings from one
cocoon 
Eisenia fetida 18-26 2-4 3.3±0.57 86.6%
Eudrilus eugeniae 12-21 2-3 2.23 ± 0.18 75.3%
Note: All values were introduced as the mean ± SD (standard deviation).


Cite this article: Ali S, Kashem MA. Life Cycle of Vermicomposting Earthworms Eisenia Fetida and Eudrilus Eugeniae Under Laboratory Con-
trolled Condition. Biomed J Sci&Tech Res 10(5)-2018. BJSTR. MS.ID.002015. DOI: 10.26717/ BJSTR.2018.10.002015. 4/4
Volume 10- Issue 5: 2018
Conclusion
The reproductive ability of Eisenia fetida is higher than Eudrilus
eugeniaeit. However, to get accurate knowledge of the full potential
of the compost worm as waste processor, it is essential that the life
cycle of the worm on waste be studied thoroughly. Eisenia fetida is
very suitable as waste decomposer.
References
1. Reynolds JW, Wetzel MJ (2004) Nomenclatura Oligochaetologica.
Supplementum Quartum. A catalogue of names, descriptions and type
specimens of the Oligochaeta. Illinois Natural History Survey Special
Publication.
2. Bouche MB (1977) Strategies Lombricennes, in Soil organisms as
components of ecosystems. (Eds.) Lohm U, Persson, Ecological Bulletins
(Stockholm) 25: 122-132.
3. Loh TC, Lee YC, Liang JB, Tan D (2004) Vermicomposting of cattle and
goat manures by Eisenia foetida and their growth and reproduction
performance. Bioresource Technology 96(1): 111-114.
4. Gunadi B, Edwards CA (2003) The effect of multipleapplications of
different organic wastes on the growth, fecundity and survival of Eisenia
fetida. Pedobiologia 47(4): 321-330.
5.         
Australia and New Zealand. Biocycle 37: 63-66.
6. Jesikha M, Lekeshmanaswamy M (2013) Effect of Pongamia Leaf
Medium on Growth of Earthworm (Eudrilus eugeniae) Int J Sci Res Publ
3(1): 2250-3153.
7. Garg VK, Kaushik P (2005) Vermistablization of textile mill sludge spiked
with poultry droppings by an epigeic earthworms Eisenia fetida. Biores
Technol 96(9): 1063-1071.
8. Suthar S (2007) Vermicomposting potential of Perionyx sansibaricus
Perrier in different waste materials. Biores Technol 98(6): 1231-1237.
9. Neuhauser EF, Hartenstein R, Kaplan DL (1980) Growth of the
earthworm Eisenia foetida in relation to population density and food
rationing. OIKOS 35(1): 93-98.
10. Nath S, Chaudhuri PS (2014) Growth and reproduction of Pontoscolex
corethrurus (Muller) with different experimental diets. Tropical Ecology
55(3): 305-312.
11. Nath G, Singh K, Singh DK (2009) Effect of different combinations of
animal dung and Agro/kitchen wastes on growth and development of
earthworm Eisenia fetida. Austr J Basic Appl Sci 3(4): 3553-3556.
12. Chauhan A, Joshi PC (2010) Composting of Some Dangerous and Toxic
Weeds Using Eisenia foetida. J Am Sci 6(3): 1-6.
13. Ndegwa PM, Thompson SA, Das KC (2000) Effects of stocking density
and feeding rate on vermicomposting of biosolids. Biores Technol 71(1):
5-12.
14. Edwards C, Bohlen PJ (1996) Biology and ecology of earthworms. 3rd
Edition, Chapman and Hall publication, London, 4(4): 202-217.
15. Monroy F, Aira M, Gago JA, Dominguez J (2007) Life cycle of the
earthworm Octodrilus complanatus (Oligochaeta, Lumbricidae).
Compter Rendus Biol 330(5): 389-391.
16. Reinecke A, Viljoen SA, Saayman RJ (1992) The suitability of Eudrilus
eugeniae, Perionyx excavates, and Eisenia fetida (Oligocheeta) for
vermicomposting in southern Africa in terms of their temperature
requirements. Soil Biol Biochem 24(12): 1295-1307.
17. Hait S, Tare V (2011) Optimizing vermistabilzation of waste activated
sludge using Vermicompost as bulking material. Waste Manag 31(3):
502-511.
18. Giraddi RS, Gundannavar KP, Tippannavar PS, Sunitha ND (2010)
Reproductive Potential of Vermicomposting Earthworms, Eudrilus
     
Seasonal Factors. Karnataka J Agric Sci 21(1): 38-40.
19. Edwards CA (1988) Breakdown of Animal, Vegetable and Industrial
Organic Wastes by Earthworms. In: Edward CA, Neuhauser EF. (eds.),
Earthworms in Waste Environ. Manag. SPB Academic Publishing, The
Hague, Netherlands p. 21-31.
20. Hartenstein R, Neuhauser EF, Kaplan DL (1979) Reproductive potential
of the earthworm Eisenia foetida. Oecologia 43(3): 329-340.
21. Mba CC (1984) Earthworm utilization of Cassava peels (Maninot
esculenta). In: Satchell JE (ed) Earthworm Ecology. Chapman & Hall,
London & New York pp. 315-321.
22. Shalabi M (2006) Vermicomposting of fecal matter as a component of
source control sanitation. Doktor-Ingenieurgenehmigte Dissertation,
Institute of Wastewater Management and Water Protection, Hamburg
University of Technology, Germany pp. 144.
23. Venter JM, Reinecke AJ (1988) The life cycle of the compost worm Eisenia
foetida (Oligochaeta). South African Journal of Zoology 23(3): 161-165.
Submission Link: https://biomedres.us/submit-manuscript.php
Assets of Publishing with us
• Global archiving of articles
• Immediate, unrestricted online access
• Rigorous Peer Review Process
• Authors Retain Copyrights
• Unique DOI for all articles
https://biomedres.us/
This work is licensed under Creative
Commons Attribution 4.0 License
ISSN: 2574-1241
DOI: 10.26717/BJSTR.2018.10.002015
Ali S.
Biomed J Sci & Tech Res