ArticlePublisher preview available

Life Cycle Assessment of Polyethylene Terephthalate Packaging: An Overview

Springer Nature
Journal of Polymers and the Environment
Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the authors.

Abstract

Life cycle assessment (LCA) is a common technique to evaluate the environmental impact of poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) packaging. A review is needed to gain a clear view of the accumulated knowledge, scientific trends and what remains to be done. The main purpose of this paper is to present an overview of LCA of PET, mainly for packaging. LCA studies of PET consist largely of two segments: final destination of post-consumer PET, comparing recycling with other options (incineration, landfilling); and alternative materials, comparing PET with other polymers or materials such as glass and aluminum cans. In the first case, the scenarios most often compared have been landfill disposal and mechanical recycling. There has also been considerable research on the use of post-consumer PET for energy conversion and chemical recycling. In the second case, the main polymer compared with PET is poly(lactic acid), whose mechanical properties make it unsuitable for carbonated beverage bottles. Numerous articles have focused only on energy consumption or global warming potential. Few studies have discussed mechanical recycling technologies in LCA and there is a lack of data on the processes used in developing countries. This review highlights the need to conduct LCA studies of PET, since many aspects are still not fully understood.
Vol.:(0123456789)
1 3
Journal of Polymers and the Environment (2019) 27:533–548
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-019-01375-5
REVIEW
Life Cycle Assessment ofPolyethylene Terephthalate Packaging:
AnOverview
ThiagoS.Gomes1 · LeilaL.Y.Visconte1,2· ElenB.A.V.Pacheco1,2
Published online: 17 January 2019
© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019
Abstract
Life cycle assessment (LCA) is a common technique to evaluate the environmental impact of poly(ethylene terephthalate)
(PET) packaging. A review is needed to gain a clear view of the accumulated knowledge, scientific trends and what remains to
be done. The main purpose of this paper is to present an overview of LCA of PET, mainly for packaging. LCA studies of PET
consist largely of two segments: final destination of post-consumer PET, comparing recycling with other options (incineration,
landfilling); and alternative materials, comparing PET with other polymers or materials such as glass and aluminum cans. In
the first case, the scenarios most often compared have been landfill disposal and mechanical recycling. There has also been
considerable research on the use of post-consumer PET for energy conversion and chemical recycling. In the second case,
the main polymer compared with PET is poly(lactic acid), whose mechanical properties make it unsuitable for carbonated
beverage bottles. Numerous articles have focused only on energy consumption or global warming potential. Few studies
have discussed mechanical recycling technologies in LCA and there is a lack of data on the processes used in developing
countries. This review highlights the need to conduct LCA studies of PET, since many aspects are still not fully understood.
Keywords Poly(ethylene terephthalate)· PET· Life cycle assessment· Recycling· Environmental impact
Introduction
Poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) is one of the main plas-
tics in urban waste, with global production of 30.3 × 106
tons in 2017 [1]. It is primarily used for packaging and tex-
tile production [2, 3]. This overview paper concentrates on
LCA of PET for packaging. PET has become popular in
the production of disposable carbonated beverage bottles
due to its durability, strength and transparency. However,
because of PET packaging short useful life and large produc-
tion volume, new challenges in determining the most appro-
priate final destination [4, 5] or replacement by renewable
materials [69] have emerged. The growing environmental
concern underscores the need for scientific research into
ways of reducing the environmental impact and managing
waste, in light of the complex interaction between produc-
tion, consumption and disposal or recycling [10]. Among
the available tools, life cycle assessment (LCA) has shown
promising results in sustainability studies [11, 12]. The most
common aspects considered in applying LCA to analyze the
final destination of PET packaging after consumption or its
replacement by renewable materials are the impact analysis
methods within geographical boundaries or scope of appli-
cations of recycled PET [4, 8, 13, 14].
This paper aims to clarify knowledge on LCA of PET,
and identify patterns between past research [15], in addition
to describing current LCA studies applied to PET and the
recycling possibilities or alternative materials used. It con-
sists of three sections: the first provides a brief definition of
the LCA method, the second involves alternative PET mate-
rials and the third alternative destinations for post-consumer
PET.
* Thiago S. Gomes
thiagosg@ima.ufrj.br
1 Instituto de Macromoléculas Professora Eloisa Mano,
Universidade Federal doRio de Janeiro, Avenida Horácio
Macedo 2.030, Centro de Tecnologia, Bloco J, Ilha do
Fundão, RiodeJaneiro, RJCEP21941-598, Brazil
2 Escola Politécnica/Programa de Engenharia Ambiental,
Universidade Federal doRio de Janeiro, RiodeJaneiro, RJ,
Brazil
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
... A dominance analysis of this film shows that energy was not the dominant inventory (over 50%) only for two impacts-human carcinogenic toxicity and marine eutrophication (Supplementary Materials). Gomes et al. [37], in their review paper, outlined that the majority of LCA studies of recycled PET were performed in two directions: to compare recycling with other waste management scenarios such as disposal or incineration and to compare recycled PET with other material, with limited papers on comparing recycled and virgin PET. Sarda et al. [38] discuss the environmental potential of recycling PET by supporting a circular economy and comparing the environmental impacts of recycled PET compared to other materials such as glass, where recycled PET is more environmentally friendly. ...
Article
Full-text available
While multilayer plastic is difficult for recycling, innovative technologies and tactics are being developed to improve the process. New technologies in chemical recycling show promising results; however, the net improvement brought to the environment, economy, and society should be assessed for their wider adoption and diffusion. This study focuses on a Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment (LCSA) of an innovative process for the sorting and chemical recycling of multilayer plastic packaging waste from post-consumer sources to obtain new packaging for the food industry. The analysis indicated that the packaging made of rPET obtained through depolymerization is environmentally and economically competitive compared to the virgin PET. Packaging made of rPET and rLDPE obtained through delamination usually performed worse (or comparable) than the virgin counterparts. The social impact assessment indicated some areas of concern (e.g., workers’ health and safety risks due to exposure to hazardous substances), as well as potential opportunities (e.g., improved local employment). This paper is the first to present a synergetic approach to the sustainability assessment of chemical recycling technologies to obtain new high-performance packaging solutions. It provides useful insights to academics, managers, and decision makers in the plastic recycling sector whether (and under what conditions) the chemical recycling of multilayer plastic waste is feasible from the environmental, economic, and social perspectives. Despite associated uncertainties, the results are promising as an attractive option for further research, optimization, and upscaling.
... Additionally, PET has a high strength-to-weight ratio, making it more versatile for wide applications. It has good chemical and physical stability, which makes it the most promising packaging material for drinking water [8,9]. Meanwhile, PE is frequently used due to its excellent water vapor barrier properties and good processability [10,11]. ...
Article
Full-text available
In addition to the mechanical properties and barrier performance, one of the key properties of flexible films used in food packaging is the resistance of their gas barrier layer to buckling and bending. Testing the gas barrier before and after mechanical stress is time-consuming and resource-intensive, but important to assure a certain gas barrier during the whole life time of the package until food consumption. The aim of this study was, on the one hand, to identify the most significant influencing factors of a composite lacquer formulation and coating on its buckling resistance and, on the other hand, to show a fast and efficient method to identify defects occurring during buckling. The influence of mechanical stress was simulated via Gelbo-Flex treatment, and the samples were examined and evaluated before and after using light microscopy. The evaluation was verified with scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and helium barrier measurement. Polyethylene terephthalate (PET) and polyethylene (PE) films were coated with composite barrier lacquers made of polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) and montmorillonite (MMT) and the wet coating layer thickness (20, 40, 80, and 130 μm) and the composition of the coating were changed. It was found that thin coatings are more resistant to buckling than thick coatings. It was also shown that a higher proportion of MMT in the coating layer leads to a better gas barrier, but poorer buckling resistance. Additionally, it was found that soft PE films are already subjected to high stresses during the coating process, which means that barrier coatings do not build up ideally. However, the barrier-coated soft film withstood mechanical stress better and lost less barrier by a lower factor than the counterpart on the basis of PET. To conclude, the evaluation of the buckling resistance with microscopy offers an efficient method during lacquer development; however, the final decision on the right lacquer composition is dependent on many factors.
... These were: global warming (g CO 2 eq), fine particulate matter (FPM) formation (mg PM2.5 eq), terrestrial acidification (mg SO 2 eq), terrestrial ecotoxicity (g 1.4-DCB), human non-carcinogenic (HNC) toxicity (g 1.4-DCB), and fossil resource scarcity (FRS) (g oil eq). It should be noted that storage and use at the end customer are not considered explicitly as, beyond the difficulties involved in assessment [35], they are beyond the control of the company. They were assumed to be constant for all packaging options. ...
Article
Full-text available
This paper adopts a systems firm-centered perspective on the environmental assessment of recyclable glass and PET soft drink containers. We employ LCA and discrete-event simulation modeling for the environmental assessment of the two soft drinks packaging alternatives in operational terms over the entire supply chain over a period of three years. The assessment is based on real data collected from a large soft drink producer and its suppliers. The research and practice contribution of the paper is twofold: first, it introduces a methodological framework for environmental assessment of companies’ packaging environmental impact under different product and operations strategies; and secondly, it provides a holistic environmental assessment of the two packaging materials (PET and glass) taking into account specific operational issues, such as product mix and recycling and reuse options, as well as activity interdependences and stochasticity. The results of the simulation experiments confirm at the operations system level, for glass, the importance for sustainability, to increase the number of reuse cycles (for the particular case, for significant improvement, seven reuses) and the percentage of used bottles collected for refilling (80% recovery rate), whereas for PET, to increase the percentage of recycled PET in new bottles (towards 30%).
... These were: global warming (g CO2 eq), fine particulate matter (FPM) formation (mg PM2.5 eq), terrestrial acidification (mg SO2 eq), terrestrial ecotoxicity (g 1.4-DCB), human non-carcinogenic (HNC) toxicity (g 1.4-DCB) and fossil resource scarcity (FRS) (g oil eq). It should be noted that storage and use at the end customer are not considered explicitly as, beyond the difficulties involved in assessment [47], they are beyond the control of the company. They were assumed to be constant for all packaging options. ...
Preprint
Full-text available
This paper adopts a systems firm-centered perspective on the environmental assessment of recyclable glass and PET soft drink containers. We employ LCA and discrete-event simulation modelling for the environmental assessment of the two soft drinks packaging alternatives in operational terms, over the entire supply chain, over a period of three years. The assessment is based on real data collected from a large soft-drinks producer and its suppliers. The research and practice contribution of the paper is twofold: first, it introduces a methodological framework for environmental assessment of companies’ packaging environmental impact under different product and operations strategies, and secondly, it provides a holistic environmental assessment of the two packaging materials (PET and glass) taking into account specific operational issues, such as product mix and recycling and reuse options, and activity interdependences and stochasticity. The results of the simulation experiments confirm at system level, for glass, the importance for sustainability, to increase the number of reuse cycles and the percentage of used bottles collected for refilling, whereas for PET, to increase the percentage of recycled PET in new bottles.
... On the other hand, reactions involved in chemical recycling represent greater processing complexity [7]. Both types of recycling consume fewer fossil resources than incineration, and emissions from the latter option can be harmful to both the environment and human health if not conducted in carefully controlled environments [8]. In this regard, studies on polymer degradation through thermal, photo-oxidative, catalytic, and/or biodegradation mechanisms can contribute to improving the management of this type of waste [9,10]. ...
Article
Full-text available
The effects of concentrated solar radiation on the thermal, chemical, and mechanical properties of post-consumer poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) films are studied in the present research work. The films were exposed to solar radiation using a compound parabolic concentrator (CPC), and the results are compared with those obtained from exposing PET films to conditions established in an accelerated weathering chamber (QUV). The CPC and QUV were evaluated on specimens measuring 2 × 13 × 0.5 cm³. Exposure in the CPC was carried out over one year during the periods of February–April, May–July, and October–December. Additionally, in the QUV, the equivalence in hours of exposure to that used in the CPC was sought. The results obtained by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) indicate a significant increase in crystallinity in the material exposed within CPC, while specimens in QUV exhibited effects related to physical aging. Information obtained from thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) showed a decrease in thermal stability and maximum degradation temperature of the exposed specimens, with a trend consistent with DSC. Intensity decreased in the infrared spectra of films exposed in the CPC, without absorption bands of photo- or thermodegradation. The intrinsic viscosity of specimens exposed to degradation showed a maximum reduction of 17%, attributed to polymeric chain cleavage due to photodegradation. The dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) evidenced a deterioration in the elastic response of the material, particularly in the one subjected to solar concentration, which is aligned with the surface cracking observed by scanning electron microscopy.
Article
Full-text available
Polyethylene terephthalate (PET) is the third most commonly used thermoplastic in post-consumer plastic packaging. The growing popularity of PET bottles, valued for their durability, recyclability, and cost-efficiency, has led to increased production and consumption, resulting in environmental harm when not properly disposed. The study attempts to provide a comprehensive review of the state-of-the-art in PET literature, highlighting end-of-life challenges and circularity challenges, and provide future research directions in this area. Using a systematic literature review approach, it identifies research gaps, including end-of-life treatment practices and impact categories. In addition, the review of 32 studies is allocated to the four stages of an LCA framework and is intended to chart future research paths. Although a discernible portion of recorded literature is found on LCA of PET bottles, the results showed that a minute proportion of studies covered the human health and resources categories. The stated work presents originality in two terms. First, it presents adequate literature discussing the LCA work applicable in the PET industry. Second, it presents the study outcome in a way that paves the way for future research highlighting the major research gaps identified through review studies.
Chapter
The exponential rise of non-biodegradable plastic and its derived waste materials poses a serious threat to ecosystems worldwide, demanding urgent action. A key approach that emphasizes sustainability and environmental safety entails recycling these waste materials into value-added products that can be used to address a wide range of environmental issues such as water pollution, polyethylene terephthalate (PET), energy shortages, and greenhouse gas emissions. PET, a chemically stable polyester with numerous applications, has witnessed an enormous spike in production and consumption in recent decades. The expansion has resulted in a corresponding agglomeration of waste PET at alarming rates, exacerbating health and environmental issues. Current waste management protocols, including land-filling and burning, along with traditional recycling procedures generating low-value products, have culminated in a poor PET recycling rate of less than 30%, necessitating innovative solutions. One captivating avenue lies in the transformation of waste PET bottles into highly valuable metal–organic frameworks (MOFs). Among several value-added products generated from waste, MOFs hold immense potential in diverse applications such as battery engineering, sustainable catalysis, sensor applications, gas adsorption and separation. This chapter delineates the fabrication of MOF organic linkers sourced from recycled PET waste. Moreover, it explores the multiple utilities of engineered MOFs in resolving environmental challenges such as H2 and CO2 capture, H2 storage, catalysis, sensing, adsorptive removal of dyes and medicinal wastes from aqueous environments, and energy applications. Each application is analyzed with a discerning eye, showcasing both the challenges and advantages inherent in their implementation while also enlightening the enormous opportunities for future breakthroughs in this flourishing field of research.
Article
Many emerging dyeing technologies have recently entered laboratory research or industrial production phases. However, only a few studies have evaluated and compared the environmental impact of different dyeing systems. This study calculated the carbon footprint of low-pressure anhydrous dyeing for polyester and compared with conventional water bath dyeing. The results showed that the carbon footprint of the anhydrous dyeing process was 1670 kgCO 2 eq/1000 kg polyester. Steam occupied the most significant proportion, accounting for 55.5%, followed by electricity at 35.5%. The waste has the lowest environmental impact, with 0.55%. Uncertainty analyses showed that the data and results in this article were reliable. The results of the sensitivity analyses indicated that more attention should be paid to the data quality of steam and electricity. Compared with the traditional water bath dyeing process, the low-pressure anhydrous dyeing system can reduce greenhouse gas emissions by more than 30% and, more importantly, can avoid almost all the consumption of clean water. This anhydrous dyeing system can save water and reduce carbon emissions, which is of positive significance to the sustainable development of the textile and fashion industry. Further studies could use the water footprint as an indicator to evaluate this dyeing system in terms of water consumption and potential environmental impact.
Article
Full-text available
Industrial ecology and life cycle sustainability assessment (LCSA) are increasingly important in research, regulation, and corporate practice. However, the assessment of the social pillar is still at a developmental stage, because social life cycle assessment (SLCA) is fragmented and lacks a foundation on empirical experience. A critical reason is the absence of general standardized indicators that clearly reflect and measure businesses’ social impact along product life cycles and supply chains. Therefore, we systematically review trends, coherences, inconsistencies, and gaps in research on SLCA indicators across industry sectors. Overall, we find that researchers address a broad variety of sectors, but only few sectors receive sufficient empirical attention to draw reasonable conclusions while the field is additionally still largely a-theoretical. Furthermore, researchers overlook important social core issues as they concentrate heavily on worker- and health-related indicators. Therefore, we synthetize the most important indicators used in research as a step toward standardization (including critical challenges in applying these indicators and recommendations for their future development), highlight important trends and gaps (e.g., the focus on worker- and health-related indicators and the a-theoretical nature of the SLCA literature), and emphasize critical shortcomings in the SLCA field organized along the key phases of design, implementation, and evolution through which performance measurement approaches such as SLCA typically progress in their development and maturation. With this, we contribute to the maturation and establishment of the social pillar of LCSA and industrial ecology.
Article
Full-text available
PurposeIn agricultural life cycle assessment (LCA), the allocation method chosen to divide impacts among co-products is an important issue, since it may change conclusions about a product’s impacts. We developed a biophysical allocation method to assign upstream environmental burdens and the use of raw materials at farm gate to the livestock co-products at the slaughterhouse based on their metabolic energy requirements. Methods Biophysical allocation is designed to build a relationship between co-products of a meat-production system and their associated net metabolic energy requirements. A metabolic growth model (Gompertz function) was combined with an energy calculation model to estimate metabolic energy requirements for the growth of an animal from birth to slaughter age. Allocation factors were calculated based on the energy required to maintain and produce body tissues (excluding waste), as a function of their chemical (protein and lipid) and physiological properties. This method was applied for an average beef cow and then compared to other allocation methods (e.g., mass, dry matter, protein, and economic). Results and discussionAt slaughter age, carcass tissues required the most energy (44 %) due to their high quantity of protein; the gastrointestinal tract and liver required about 28 and 5 %, respectively, of total metabolic energy requirements due to their roles in body metabolism. Biophysical allocation considers the energy cost of building and maintaining the tissues, regardless of their final uses. It reflects physical relationships among co-products as well as other allocation methods do. It also reveals the cause-effect relationship between tissues according to the energy required to maintain physiological functions. Once the growing time until slaughter is set, biophysical allocation factors are not influenced over time, unlike those of economic allocation, which is highly influenced by price variability. Conclusions This study provides a generic and robust biophysical allocation method for estimating environmental burdens of co-products, in accordance with ISO allocation rules. The method can be considered an original contribution to international debates on allocation methods applied to livestock products in LCA. In this paper, it is applied to cattle-related product, but it is generic and the principles can be adapted to any kind of livestock species. It should be considered and discussed by stakeholders in livestock production industries.
Article
Full-text available
PurposeIn response to a need for interoperable LCA databases of adequate quality, a review of 40 datasets from emerging economies has been conducted with UNEP support by independent LCA experts, with the purpose to encourage improvements, either prior to publication or as part of a continuous improvement cycle. We discuss the lessons learned during this reviewing process. Methods The review effort had to be delivered in a set and limited timeline of 9 months and covered 20 datasets from Malaysia, ten from Brazil, and ten from Thailand. The developed review process consisted in, among others, (i) developing a set of review criteria for this specific effort, (ii) pairing a local sector reviewer with an international LCA expert to enhance capacity development, (iii) establishing a legal relationship via a non-disclosure agreement (NDA) between the data provider and the data reviewers, and (iv) providing a review report for each dataset that assesses the presence and magnitude of gaps or deficiencies relative to the criteria, as well as their implications for qualifying usage. Results and discussionThe reviews provided solid recommendations for improvement to the majority of the datasets submitted by the three countries. This review exercise has been conducted in the given timeframe for the majority of the datasets. Many challenges have been faced along the way; among them agreeing on an NDA, the need for sufficient information, and the question of the confidentiality of the data. The developed set of criteria for this exercise have not been presented or discussed outside of the narrow review exercise and therefore can be seen as a starting point for further debates and improvements that should involve the broad LCA community. Conclusions This hands-on exercise provided some valuable insights into the road towards global consensus and guidance on data review. Beyond this time-constrained effort, a broader discussion and consensus at international level on the review of datasets and a continuous effort in reviewing datasets is desirable. Four key aspects were identified as necessary to consider: review criteria, review process, reviewers’ selection criteria, and development of a legal basis which protects the confidentiality of the data, as well as the position of the reviewers. This last aspect is sensitive as, in LCA datasets reviews, companies and/or countries might disclose some information with high stakes regarding competition and trade.
Chapter
This chapter lists and answers key questions relating to the packaging, storage and distribution of soft drinks and fruit juices. It covers packaging selection, defects, problems during filling and packaging operations, post filling defects, storage conditions and distribution problems.
Chapter
Biodegradable polymers have undergone extensive investigation since the 1970s. They can be either natural or synthetic and can be derived from either renewable or nonrenewable resources. A series of truly biodegradable petroleum-based synthetic polymers has been developed. However, owing to concerns over environmental pollution and the depletion of fossil oils, intensive research is being conducted for developing biodegradable polymers and plastic materials from renewable natural resources such as starch, cellulose, and soy protein. Polylactic acid and polyhydroxyalkanoates are the two most important biodegradable polymers derived from renewable resources. They are thermoplastics and show mechanical properties and processability similar to some petroleum-based polymers. There have been many research achievements in biodegradable and biobased polymers, including naturally occurring biodegradable polymers, biodegradable polymers derived from renewable resources, and biodegradable polymers based on petroleum, although several biobased polymers may not be biodegradable.
Chapter
In short, LCA or Life Cycle Assessment is a method for capturing environmental impacts of a product or service from raw material extraction (or "cradle") through to disposal (the "gravea"). As we strive to understand what is sustainable from an environmental perspective, we need credible, comprehensive scientific tools to understand the system that we are trying to change. LCA is a powerful tool that allows us to study the system, measure impacts, and understand tradeoffs. As we can see in Fig. 1, LCA studies the entire supply chain for product manufacturing as well as impacts occurring during use and end of life. This allows us to understand how changing impacts in one part of the life cycle affects other parts of the life cycle. Because LCA attempts to assess all environmentally relevant impacts, it also allows us to understand tradeoffs between different impacts, such as climate change and ozone depletion.
Article
This paper presents an attributional life cycle assessment of biopolymers and traditional plastics using real world disposal methods based on collected data and existing inventories. The focus of this LCA is to investigate actual disposal methods for the end of life phase of biopolymers and traditional fossil-based plastics relative to their corresponding production impacts. This paper connects commonly available methods of disposal for traditional fossil-based plastics and the compostability of polylactic acid and thermoplastic starch to compare these materials not just based on production impacts but also on various scenarios for recycling, composting, and landfilling. Additionally, three traditional resins were evaluated (PET, HDPE, and LDPE) using fossil and bio-based production pathways to assess the performance of bio-based products in the recycling stream. The results demonstrate real environmental tradeoffs associated with agricultural production of plastics and the consequential changes resulting from shifting from recyclable to compostable products. The potential for methane production in landfills is a significant factor for global warming impacts associated with biopolymers while recycling provides major benefits in the global warming and fossil fuel depletion categories. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to investigate the relative importance of locale-specific factors such as travel distances and sorting technologies to the end of life treatment methods of recycling, composting, and landfilling. The results show that composting has some advantages, especially when compared to impacts associated with landfilling, but that recycling provides the greatest benefits at end of life.
Article
The aim of this study was to evaluate the environmental burden of non-alcoholic single serving size polyethylene terephthalate beverage bottle systems in the state of California through a life cycle assessment model. A mass flow of polyethylene terephthalate beverage bottle in the U.S., and the state of California is drawn as a Sankey diagram. The life cycle assessment model is designed with five main sections; material production, polyethylene terephthalate bottle production, waste management, environmental benefit, and transportation. The scope is cradle-to-grave with a representative functional unit as the amount of polyethylene terephthalate necessary to deliver 1000 L of beverage, specifically in carbonated soda, water and tea. To identify the strategy to reduce the environmental burden of the overall system, several scenarios are established as the management intervention by reducing two different polyethylene terephthalate waste sources; post-consumer polyethylene terephthalate bottle collection waste, scenario ‘c’, and yield loss of the reclamation process, scenario ‘r’. The contribution analysis indicates that the polyethylene terephthalate bottle production is the highest environmental burden source in most of the impact indicator. Scenario ‘r’ is translated in higher environmental benefit than the pursuit of scenario ‘c’ in every impact indicator. The results show that increasing efficiency of the reclamation process provides a larger environmental benefit than improving the post-consumer bottle collection system for polyethylene terephthalate beverage bottle in the state of California. The results can be used to comprehend the main environmental burden of polyethylene terephthalate bottles and to optimize their recovery in the other 49 U.S. states and around the world.
Article
To attend the growing consumer demand for novel ready-to-eat fresh cut fruits packaging polylactic acid (PLA)-based active packaging was realized. The aim of these packaging is to provide an improved protection and even to extend their shelf-life. PLA-based active packaging was prepared by adding nanoclays and surfactants in its formulation. The evaluation of PLA-nanocomposite packaging was done in comparison to pristine PLA and conventional plastic (polyethylene terephthalate, PET) using fresh-cut melons. Physicochemical properties were investigated by the means of weight loss, visual appearance, pH, colour, and firmness. In addition, microbial profile was tested via microbiological assays. In order to evaluate the environmental impact of PLA-based active packaging compared to commonly used PET, life cycle assessment (LCA) was conducted. In terms of physicochemical and antimicrobial properties, the results clearly showed that the presence of nanoclays and surfactants in the PLA formulations improved their performance, thus contributing to bring the characteristic and behaviour of PLA packages close to those of PET. Furthermore, assessment of life cycle environmental impacts indicated that PLA packaging with nanoclays had the highest environmental performance.