ArticlePDF Available

Scales for measuring UAV micro-motor static thrust

Authors:
  • Space Research and Technology Institute -- Bulgarian Academy of Sciences

Abstract and Figures

With the advent of micro-sized unmanned helicopters and airplanes weighing under 250 g certain needs for measurement instruments and setups are emerging. The authors have identified the lack of micro-motor measurement instruments and more specifically a static thrust gauge device. For this reason, scales to measure static motor thrust was advised and further developed as a laboratory setup. The motors that are subject to testing with the described instrument are the brushed micro-sized coreless electric motors, well suited for micro-drones with total weight under 250 g. The scale is fitting different sizes of micro-motors and appropriate control of the input voltage is provided. The instrument is measuring simultaneously the applied voltage to the motor and the current it consumes, along with the static thrust the motor generates. The scale is versatile – it measures both pusher and tractor propeller configurations. Pusher propellers in micro-drones are gaining significant attention lately due to their better efficiency characteristics.
Content may be subject to copyright.
96
Bulgarian Academy of Sciences. Space Research and Technology Institute.
Aerospace Research in Bulgaria. 30, 2018, Sofia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3897/arb.v30.e08
SCALES FOR MEASURING
UAV MICRO-MOTOR STATIC THRUST
Svetoslav Zabunov, Garo Mardirossian
Space Research and Technology Institute Bulgarian Academy of Sciences
Abstract
With the advent of micro-sized unmanned helicopters and airplanes weighing under 250 g
certain needs for measurement instruments and setups are emerging. The authors have identified the
lack of micro-motor measurement instruments and more specifically a static thrust gauge device. For
this reason, a scales to measure static motor thrust was advised and further developed as a
laboratory setup.
The motors that are subject to testing with the described instrument are the brushed micro-
sized coreless electric motors, well suited for micro-drones with total weight under 250 g. The scale
is fitting different sizes of micro-motors and appropriate control of the input voltage is provided. The
instrument is measuring simultaneously the applied voltage to the motor and the current it consumes,
along with the static thrust the motor generates. The scale is versatile it measures both pusher and
tractor propeller configurations. Pusher propellers in micro-drones are gaining significant attention
lately due to their better efficiency characteristics.
Introduction
The miniaturization of unmanned aerial vehicle avionics in the last few
years has led to increased interest in the design of drones having maximum total
weight less than or equal to 250 g [1]. Further, in the legislation of several
countries, a registration requirement was recently introduced, applying to drones,
as well as drone owners of machines weighing over 250 g.
There is a long list of benefits the micro-UAVs offer in comparison to
larger drones. Most important of these are:
Low cost for manufacturing and maintenance.
Lower risk for damaging objects and living beings due to less weight
and decreased kinetic energy of the rotors.
Ease of transportation and storage.
Low visibility due to small dimensions.
Reduced RADAR signature [26].
Reduced acoustic signature.
Negotiability through windows and manoeuvrability inside buildings.
97
The current paper discloses a test instrument, developed by the authors,
used to measure the static thrust generated by coreless brushed micro-motors,
suitable for micro-drones. The test setup is shown in Fig. 1. The proposed device is
a weighing scale with three arms and is designed to be implemented in examining
micro-motors having 7 mm diameter of the motor body. There are different motor
sizes according to motor body length: 17 mm, 20 mm, etc. Motors with different
body diameter are also suitable to be tested with the proposed equipment after
minor modifications.
Fig. 1. Scale for measuring static thrust of micro-motors
Fig. 2 presents some of the most frequently used coreless micro-motors for
small UAVs. All of the motors up to 8.5 × 20 mm are powered with maximum
supply voltage of 3 V. The motor mounted on the scales in Fig. 1 is a 7 × 20 mm
type motor (Fig. 2 – left).
98
Fig. 2. Brushed coreless micro-motors, frequently employed in micro-UAVs.
From left to right: 7 × 20 mm, 7 × 16 mm, 6 × 14 mm, 8.5 × 20 mm.
Construction
The construction of the scales is based on the balanced scales principle
the scales arms have equal length, pivoted on a fulcrum. Nevertheless, unlike the
classic balance scales, the instrument proposed here has three, instead of two arms
with equal length. The arms are positioned in one plane and are at 90 degree angles
from one another.
Fig. 3. Static thrust scales in equilibrium
99
Applying the same moment of force, but with inverse signs, to two of the
arms would keep the scales in equilibrium. Due to arms’ equal length, in order to
generate equal moments of force one should apply equal forces to arms’ ends, such
that each force is perpendicular to the given arm and lies in the plane, defined by
the three arms.
The moving part – the arms structure – is secured to the scales base
through a bearing, acting as the scales fulcrum. The friction of the bearing
introduces an error of less than 0.1 g.
The instrument in balance is shown in Fig. 3. Two of the arms are
horizontal and have weighing dishes where weights may be placed. The third arm
is vertical and employs a motor mount.
Electrical schematic
The scales instrument has a socket for supplying electrical power through a
cable. The voltage delivered to the device is 3.6 V, coming from a single cell
Li-Ion battery. The motor voltage is filtered by a 100 nF capacitor. Further, the
voltage is manually regulated by means of a powerful (2 W) 10 ohm potentiometer,
connected in series with the motor.
Fig. 4. Scales electrical schematic
A digital voltmeter measures the voltage applied to the motor and displays
the result in volts on a red coloured LED digital display (Fig. 1, 4 and 6). The
current flowing through the motor is measured by a digital ammeter, displaying the
current in amperes on a blue coloured LED digital display (Fig. 1, 4 and 6). Both
metering instruments were laboratory calibrated. The electrical circuit is powered
on and off using a master switch (the red coloured switch on the right-hand side of
the scales – Fig. 1).
100
Measurements
In Fig. 3 and 6, the motor mount was populated with a 7 × 20 mm coreless
brushed motor having shaft diameter of 0.9 mm. On the shaft, a 55 mm tractor
propeller was mounted (black coloured propeller). This propeller is standard for the
attached motor and generally delivers maximum static thrust in the range of
20–22 g. A common rule for multi-rotor helicopters is to fly at 50 % of the
maximum static thrust a rotor is capable of generating. For this reason the given
motor has been tested at 10 g static thrust.
For a weight of 10 g two coins of 50 Bulgarian Lev cents (see Fig. 5) were
adapted. According to Bulgarian National Bank, each such coin weighs 5 g.
Fig. 5. Used scales weight of 10 g
The process of searching for equilibrium starts by placing the 10 g weight
in the right-hand side scales dish (Fig. 6 – left), turning the potentiometer to
minimum voltage and switching on the master switch. The pot is then slowly
turned such that voltage is increased. The motor is measured to generate 10 g of
thrust when the scales has just left balance but instead of inclining to the side of
the weight, it falls to the other side – left inclination – lifting the 10 g weight up.
101
Fig. 6. Tractor versus pusher propeller configuration
The same measurement is taken after mounting a pusher propeller (green
coloured propeller) of the same type to the motor shaft (Fig. 6 right). Now, the
weight is moved to the left weighing dish and the process of searching balance is
repeated.
The results of the measurements show a definite benefit from using a
pusher instead of a tractor propeller. The measurement results are summarized in
Table 1. A 14.7 % savings in power drain is observed, which translates directly
into the same increase in fight time and range of the unmanned aerial vehicle. On
the other hand, this power economy may be used to increase the payload of the
UAV.
The decrease of power consumed for creating the needed static thrust
comes from the lack of aerodynamic drag (form drag and skin friction) against the
beam, holding the rotor in this case this is the scales arm and the motor body.
In real scenario, a pusher propeller’s accelerated airflow will avoid any parts of the
aircraft it might encounter, which would, otherwise generate unwanted parasitic
drag.
Table 1. Generating 10 g static thrust in tractor and pusher propeller configurations
Voltage
Current
Power
Tractor propeller configuration
1.9 V
0.86 A
1.634 W
Pusher propeller configuration
1.7 V
0.82 A
1.394 W
Power gain: 14.7%
Conclusions
The authors have been in development of unmanned aerial vehicle models
since 2014 and have intentions in future continuation of their work [7]. The advent
of micro UAVs as a branch of unmanned vehicles is posing significant challenge,
but also giving pleasant rewards for the large area of their possible implementation.
102
References
1. Coffey, T., J.A. Montgomery. The Emergence of Mini UAVs for Military Applications.
Defense Horizons Dec. 2002, 22, 18.
2. Chenchen, J. Li, H. Ling. Radar Signatures of Small Consumer Drones. AP-S/USNC-URSI
IEEE, Puerto Rico, 2016, 1–23.
3. Hammer, M., M. Hebel, B. Borgmann, M. Laurenzis, M. Arens. Potential of LIDAR sensors
for the detection of UAVs. Proc. SPIE 10636, Laser Radar Technology and
Applications XXIII, 1063605 (10 May 2018); DOI:10.1117/12.2303949.
4. Molchanov, P., R. I.A. Harmanny, J. J.M. de Wit, K. Egiazarian, and J. Astola.
Classification of small UAVs and birds by micro-Doppler signatures. Int. J. of
Microwave and Wireless Techno., 2014, 6, 3/4, 435–44. Cambridge University Press
and the European Microwave Association, 2014, DOI:10.1017/S1759078714000282.
5. Kim, B.-K., J. Park, S.-J. Park et al. Drone Detection with Chirp-Pulse Radar Based on
Target Fluctuation Models. ETRI Journal, 2018, 40, 2, 188–96.
6. Birch, G.C., J.C. Griffin, and M.K. Erdman. UAS Detection, Classification, and
Neutralization: Market Survey 2015. Sandia Report, SAND2015-6365, 1–74.
7. Zabunov, S., P. Getsov, and G. Mardirossian. XZ-4 vertical takeoff and landing multi-rotor
aircraft. Asian Journal of Natural & Applied Sciences, 2014, 3, 4, 1–7.
ВЕЗНИ ЗА ИЗМЕРВАНЕ НА СТАТИЧНАТА ТЯГА
НА МИКРОДВИГАТЕЛИ ЗА БЛА
С. Забунов, Г. Мардиросян
Резюме
С навлизането на безпилотните летателни апарати (БЛА) с микро-
размери и маса не повече от 250 g, се появява и нужда от измервателни
средства, адаптирани към тези машини. Тук е констатирана липса на подобни
средства и по-конкретно везни за измерване на статичната тяга, генерирана
от двигателите. Поради това е разработена лабораторна везна с
гореописаното предназначение. Могат да се тестват колекторни двигатели
без сърцевина в ротора.
Двигателите, които са предмет на измервания и тестване с описания
инструмент, са с миниатюрни размери. Последните са подходящи за
приложение в БЛА с микро-размери и маса до 250 g.
Везната работи с различни размери на двигателите и предоставя
контрол на захранващото им напрежение, тока на консумация и статичната
тяга. Тя е приложима за измерване, както на теглещи, така и на тласкащи
витла. Тласкащите витла за микро-дронове придобиват все по-голяма
популярност поради по-високата си ефективност.
... In his solution, the data was acquired by software Matlab-Simulink and the motor was driven by an application that generates pulse width modulation (PWM) signal for the Electronic Speed Controller (ESC). Zabunov [2] describes an instrument that is based on a simple two arm balancing mechanism that is suitable for thrust measurement of propellers for micro-UAVs. The thrust was measured by a common scale. ...
... According to the cited approaches, where the researchers are using only single purpose systems [1][2][3], where their solution can measure only a few motorpropeller combinations and where in some cases measurement of several quantities (e. g. current consumption, RPM etc.) is missing [4] or they use inaccurate measurement devices or sensors (e. g. panel voltmeter/ammeter on the power supply) [1-3, 5, 7] , our solution provides an innovative and compact method for measurement of several unknown parameters of a wide range of motor/propeller combinations by calibrated sensors with defined accuracy. In comparison with methods cited in [1][2][3] our system is not directly integrated to a microcontroller, so it is possible to use it with several kinds of embedded boards (Raspberry Pi, STM32 etc.). ...
... According to the cited approaches, where the researchers are using only single purpose systems [1][2][3], where their solution can measure only a few motorpropeller combinations and where in some cases measurement of several quantities (e. g. current consumption, RPM etc.) is missing [4] or they use inaccurate measurement devices or sensors (e. g. panel voltmeter/ammeter on the power supply) [1-3, 5, 7] , our solution provides an innovative and compact method for measurement of several unknown parameters of a wide range of motor/propeller combinations by calibrated sensors with defined accuracy. In comparison with methods cited in [1][2][3] our system is not directly integrated to a microcontroller, so it is possible to use it with several kinds of embedded boards (Raspberry Pi, STM32 etc.). ...
Article
Full-text available
At present, there are several types of propellers in the field of the use of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) with unknown parameters, where it is necessary to provide information about their thrust, current consumption and maximal rotational speed (RPM). Commonly used methods for measurement of a propeller's thrust are mostly based on the usage of a single purpose system, on short measurements without data storage or on inaccurate sensors. The goal of this article is to develop a universal experimental measuring system for more accurate measurement of propeller's parameters (thrust, current consumption, maximal RPM). For more accurate measurement, the battery voltage, temperature and humidity of the environment were also measured. To acquire, measure and store the data safely on a micro SD card, a processing circuit based on an ATmega2560 microcontroller was developed. This innovative approach allowed to analyse the behaviour of the propeller and to measure the dependencies of the RPM on pulse width, of the current on RPM and of the thrust on RPM at different input conditions. The measurements have shown that the dependencies can be approximated by cubic functions. The mathematical description allows predicting the behaviour of the propeller in unmeasurable conditions.
... In response to these issues, this work aims to explore and propose a simple yet robust test rig design that is reliable in measuring the static thrust for small-sized propellers. To simplify and ease the complexity of the force measurement system, a common weight scale was used in each proposed design, which is commonly used by hobbyists or remote-control enthusiasts [12]. Each design was focused on propeller size with a maximum diameter of 10 inches, which is also commonly used for small-sized drones or quadcopters. ...
... Each design manipulates the basic swing arm geometry, which is primarily used to transfer the thrust force based on a fulcrum or pivoting system. The weight scale is also used as the force measurement system in all designs in order to maintain simplicity in measuring the thrust force induced by the propeller [12]. Both PMTR-1 and PMTR-3 utilize a fulcrum or pivot point, allowing the swing arm to move freely at a pivot point and transmit the thrust force to the measurement system (weight scale). ...
Article
This paper aims to propose a simple, straightforward, yet robust test rig design to measure the static thrust magnitude for small propellers. Although there were advanced tools like multi-axis force or torque sensors, sophisticated equipment and complex mechanisms were required to capture the accurate thrust magnitude. Therefore, providing simple and effective test rig design for small-sized propellers is quite challenging. In this work, Pugh matrix analysis was used to evaluate three new designs of Propeller Thrust Measurement Rig (PMTR) and compare the designs against a benchmark model. The evaluation covered important design criteria during test operation, such as measurement accuracy, stability, ease of development, assembly, maintenance, versatility, electronic integration, airflow interference, adaptability for tilt angle studies, and resemblance to multicopter flight conditions. The results reveal that the PMTR-1 design scored the highest in the analysis and emerged as the most suitable candidate among the proposed designs. It showed potential superior performance in stability, ease of development and assembly, versatility, simplicity, airflow management, and adaptability for future studies. PMTR-3 demonstrated some potential but needs more enhancement in electronic integration and structural development. However, PMTR-2 faces significant potential challenges in providing stability, versatility, electronic integration, and adaptability for effective and safe operations.
... Despite the mentioned problems, it is possible to use a simplified mathematical model of UAV dynamics [44][45][46], but it must be able to directly measure the UAV parameters, especially the complete thrust characteristics of the motors, which are very important in setting the control algorithms of the UAV, as already mentioned. Currently, there are several methods that can measure UAV motor parameters, from measuring propeller parameters to measuring motor thrust, but such measurements require removing the motor from the UAV [47,48]. However, this could be again time-consuming. ...
Article
Full-text available
This article deals with the design and creation of a tensometric measuring system to measure the parameters of an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) of the quadcopter type. The system was designed to measure the total UAV thrust and the thrust of its individual motors. The distribution of forces from the UAV motors and their transmission to the sensors was ensured by a specially designed construction, for which the mechanical stresses were simulated and analysed for different modes of the UAV flight. The thrust measurement was performed by four pairs of strain gauges. A measurement system designed in this way and the measured parameters of the UAV can be used for tuning the flight control algorithms applied in the autopilot.
Article
Purpose The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of propeller thrust with two different duct configurations. Propellers in a quadcopter play an indispensable role in generating the necessary thrust and torque to keep the drone flying and manoeuvring. Based on the specific purpose of the unmanned aerial vehicle, both the altitude and attitude can be varied by the amount of thrust produced. Design/methodology/approach This paper deals with the generation of three numerical models such as plain rotor, rotor with fixed duct and rotor with rotating duct and the comparison of their amount of generated thrust. The plain rotor numerical analysis was compared with the experimental results. The rotor taken for the analysis was 15 mm*5.5 mm TAROT 650. Thrust was measured for all models at four different angular speeds, such as 2,500 rpm, 4,000 rpm, 5,500 rpm and 7,000 rpm. Findings Due to the suction pressure gradient on the duct inlet surface, the additional amount of lift is produced, and it is the best way of increasing propulsion efficiency and its aerodynamic performance as it reduces the tip loss at the tip of the propeller. The turbulence model taken for the numerical analysis was k − ε . Originality/value The rotating duct is expected to provide additional thrust by the increased upward force due to the rotation of duct. The rotating duct produced the optimal results between the plain model and ducted model. At the highest speed of 7,000 rpm, the ducted propeller produced 24.97 N, and the rotating duct propeller produced 23.89 N, whereas the plain propeller produced 23 N thrust. Nearly 8.6% of the thrust improvement is observed in duct and 3.87% in rotating duct.
Article
Full-text available
The rapid development of unmanned multi-rotor helicopters has made small electric helicopters ubiquitous and wide spread in our everyday life. From photographic platforms to scientific test beds these machines have invaded our work and activities to a significant extend engaging into areas of service and utilisation that no other technical tool after the personal computer and the smart phone has ever achieved. But with its fast development the limits of the new technology soon are revealed. Multi-rotor helicopters cannot fly to a long distance nor can they sustain prolonged periods of flying without charging the batteries. On the other hand, the good old fixed wing aircraft now equipped with electric motors copes well with such tasks. A solution to this requirement is the already well studied and tested vertical takeoff and landing technology. But all present developments implement cumbersome and extremely complex systems to achieve the so defined goal. The current article presents a novel construction of the vertical takeoff and landing electric multi-rotor aircraft, which solves all present problems of complex and expensive structures and systems and offers a simple yet high quality vertical takeoff and landing aircraft design.
Article
Full-text available
Radar signatures of several small consumer drones are investigated by laboratory measurement. The drones are rotated on a turntable, and backscattered data are collected at two different frequency bands. The data are post-processed into inverse synthetic aperture radar images. The effects of frequency, aspect, polarization, dynamic blade rotation, camera mount, and drone types are presented.
Article
This paper presents a pulse radar system to detect drones based on a target fluctuation model, specifically the Swerling target model. Because drones are small atypical objects and are mainly composed of non‐conducting materials, their radar cross‐section value is low and fluctuating. Therefore, determining the target fluctuation model and applying a proper integration method are important. The proposed system is herein experimentally verified and the results are discussed. A prototype design of the pulse radar system is based on radar equations. It adopts three different pulse modes and a coherent pulse integration to ensure a high signal‐to‐noise ratio. Outdoor measurements are performed with a prototype radar system to detect Doppler frequencies from both the drone frame and blades. The results indicate that the drone frame and blades are detected within an instrumental maximum range. Additionally, the results show that the drone's frame and blades are close to the Swerling 3 and 4 target models, respectively. By the analysis of the Swerling target models, proper integration methods for detecting drones are verified and can thus contribute to increasing in detectability.
Conference Paper
The problem of unmanned aerial vehicles classification using continuous wave radar is considered in this paper. Classification features are extracted from micro-Doppler signature. Before the classification, the micro-Doppler signature is filtered and aligned to compensate the Doppler shift caused by the target's body motion. Eigenpairs extracted from the correlation matrix of the signature are used as informative features for classification. The proposed approach is verified on real radar measurements collected with 9.5 GHz radar. Planes, quadrocopter, helicopters and stationary rotors as well as birds are considered for classification. Moreover, a possibility of distinguishing different number of rotors is considered. The obtained results show the effectiveness of the proposed approach. It provides capability of correct classification with a probability of around 95%.
UAS Detection, Classification, and Neutralization: Market Survey
  • G C Birch
  • J C Griffin
  • M K Erdman
Birch, G. C., J. C. Griffin, M. K. Erdman. UAS Detection, Classification, and Neutralization: Market Survey 2015. SANDIA REPORT, SAND2015-6365, Unlimited Release, 1-74.