First-person communal-science meditation-retreat on “Dreaming of Reality: The Integration of Science and Spirituality in Lucid Dreaming,__'Physics',__& Dream Yoga,”

Abstract

Meditatively, a profound assessment is that personhood of the psyche is also relative to anthropic psychological factors; thus configured, it dissolves in and out of a defined substrate consciousness {of innate access to direct non-conceptual cognition): a genderless consciousness lacking ordinary language and personal history. Of awareness descended into that substrate, it is [Lex.] no longer posited as gross conceptual mind (akin but cognitively not at all the same as sleep processes), it is trans-anthropo-centric mental-sense experience of e.g. Lex. luminosity and cognisance (also reflecting both the Physical and Immaterial empirical properties unified at this level, Prana and Primary_Consciousness). The factors are of investigation in trans-personal psychology, of psyche relative to dimensions of consciousness. The elucidative factors of normative lucid-dream science and dream-yoga practice alike, are applied and perfected significances in diverse cultural forms. Psyche is then viewed as a homogenous configuration of courser-level personhood. From the contemplative perspective of the substrate, there is relatively no anthropocentric person or animal in there on the stage of consciousness. The relative-subject-awareness as observer-participant, also arises prior to the imputation of personhood and phenomena, by gender or language. Galileo longed to transcend anthropo-centricity and become a contemplative; but circumstances not being conducive, astronomy was the plausible alternative. There was moreover, desire to understand phenomena by way of another language than Latin (Wallace's dialog); significantly, too many genders and bias static-representational factors were associated to this milieu. There were inhuman senses of science going on at that time, and a universal geometry of astronomical science was a contrastive natural language; and this began to give perspective to the physical and immaterial ontological quandaries. The sense-making lexicons relating to an explicate substrate consciousness-and indeed further to implicate primordial-stratum of phenomena, consciousness and space-indeed reflect both the exploration and its NL langue, delineating valid essential characteristics, meaningful as ontological working hypotheses of an inner and outer science.

Full text

The Stu of Dreams : the Transpersonal Substrate Consciousness
Meditatively, a profound assessment is that personhood of the psyche is also relative to anthropic
psychological factors; thus configured, it dissolves in and out of a defined substrate consciousness
{of innate access to direct non-conceptual cognition): a genderless consciousness lacking ordinary
language and personal history. Of awareness descended into that substrate, it is [Lex.] no longer
posited as gross conceptual mind (akin but cognitively not at all the same as sleep processes), it is
trans-anthropo-centric mental-sense experience of e.g. Lex. luminosity and cognisance (also
reflecting both the Physical and Immaterial empirical properties unified at this level, Prana
and Primary_Consciousness). The factors are of investigation in trans-personal psychology,
of psyche relative to dimensions of consciousness. The elucidative factors of normative lucid-dream
science and dream-yoga practice alike, are applied and perfected significances in diverse cultural
forms. Psyche is then viewed as a homogenous configuration of courser-level personhood. From the
contemplative perspective of the substrate, there is relatively no anthropocentric person or animal in
there on the stage of consciousness. The relative-subject-awareness as observer-participant, also
arises prior to the imputation of personhood and phenomena, by gender or language.
Galileo longed to transcend anthropo-centricity and become a contemplative; but circumstances
not being conducive, astronomy was the plausible alternative. There was moreover, desire to
understand phenomena by way of another language than Latin (Wallace's dialog); significantly, too
many genders and bias static-representational factors were associated to this milieu. There were
inhuman senses of science going on at that time, and a universal geometry of astronomical science
was a contrastive natural language; and this began to give perspective to the physical and
immaterial ontological quandaries. The sense-making lexicons relating to an explicate substrate
consciousness--and indeed further to implicate primordial-stratum of phenomena, consciousness
and space--indeed reflect both the exploration and its NL langue, delineating valid essential
characteristics, meaningful as ontological working hypotheses of an inner and outer science.
Below are topical considerations of Scientist Wallace 2019 topics, that should follow with available
selected transcripts of his discursive discourse, as per elucidative documentary function of support
as online Contemplative Observatory facilities.
1. What is phrased by the chief scientist Wallace of the International Shamatha ['DynEq']
Project as “Developing Four Kinds of Intelligence for Optimal Mental Health and Balance,”
2. “A Key to Mental Resilience: A Meaningful Life,” and in connection with first-person
communal-science meditation-retreat on “Dreaming of Reality: The Integration of Science and
Spirituality in Lucid Dreaming,__'Physics',__& Dream Yoga,”
These Practices also contain elucidations of a threefold meditational salient phrasings from the
perspectives of : View, Meditation, and Conduct, and what is phrased as “Developing Four Kinds of
Intelligence for Optimal Mental Health and Balance,” : “A Key to Mental Resilience: A Meaningful
Life,”