Article

A Vineyard in a Law Clinic: The Practical Application of a Therapeutic Jurisprudence Philosophy in a UK Law Clinic

Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the authors.

Abstract

In late 2015, the British Red Cross approached the lead author. It was increasingly evident that given the austerity-driven political agenda of the UK government in cutting public funding to advisory services, coupled with the developing refugee crisis and its impact on countries and regions, refugees in many parts of the UK were in need of legal and non-legal assistance. University law clinics were an obvious source of support given their objectives of developing students’ understanding and engagement with community groups. As our law clinic, based in the Helena Kennedy Centre for International Justice (HKC), was developed specifically to address the needs of groups such as refugees, and given the ground-breaking work of Wexler and Winick (in Therapeutic Jurisprudence) and Gould and Perlin (on its application to clinical legal education) on providing a therapeutically positive experience for users, we sought to base our clinic aligned with Therapeutic Jurisprudence (TJ) principles. This paper examines the development and practical operation of a law clinic from a TJ perspective. It discusses how we have sought to infuse its core values, style and techniques, underpinned by humanitarian philosophies, into Clinical Legal Education (and as a starting point for its legal pedagogy). To date, most papers in this area have examined criminal law clinics in the US, but this paper is made unique by its focus upon the linkage between TJ and refugees against the UK contextual backdrop. As both frameworks strive towards achieving the same objectives (social justice and human rights), the close alignment between TJ and the HKC has allowed the Clinic (and its students) to learn from TJ as a rich and broad school of enquiry. This is particularly important when considering recent political UK initiatives keen to promote/incorporate comprehensive law practices into law processes more readily. As such, the ideas that TJ exhorts are becoming an increasingly important skills-base for graduates, particularly for those students who will become the next generation of lawyers/advisors, and must therefore also be incorporated into global legal education.

No full-text available

Request Full-text Paper PDF

To read the full-text of this research,
you can request a copy directly from the authors.

... Similarly, TJ's subject matter is wide; distinguished originally by criminal law and justice expertise (Wexler and Winick, 2003), it has since been applied to torts (Shuman, 1992), contract (Harrison, 1994), estates (Glover, 2012), family law (Lens et al., 2016), mental health law (Perlin, 2012(Perlin, , 2013b, disability law (Perlin, 2013c), workplace bullying (Yamada, 1999(Yamada, , 2008, administrative and private law (Cramer & Vols, 2016;Koch & Diesen, 2016) and refugee reunion (Marson, Ferris, & Kawalek, 2019a, inter alia. Whilst its wide scope is not problematic per se, and can in fact be regarded advantageously, it has further exposed TJ to the critiques of being abstract, especially when application of the terms "therapeutic" "countertherapeutic" and "wellbeing" to these topics are seemingly boundless (Roderick & Krumholz, 2006;Slobogin, 1995). ...
Conference Paper
Since its inception in the 1980s, the growing body of Therapeutic Jurisprudence (“TJ”) scholarship has continued to challenge and optimise not only our understanding of what the law “is”, but also how we can leverage its therapeutic agency to improve the ways in which we design, apply, observe and evaluate the law. By focusing on the emotional, human and psychological consequences of legal processes, TJ empowers practitioners to design emotionally intelligent and remedial strategies to either minimise harmful consequences or enhance restorative legal goals and outcomes. As the influence of TJ scholarship and its practical applications has continued to gain traction in rapid and organic growth, collaborations brokered with a wide range of social science disciplines have called for more robust focus on validated measurement tools. To that end, there is a clear and growing need for a suite of TJ specific tools for empirical observation, evaluation and measurement. To date, there has been no attempt within the TJ research community to begin this process. This paper, therefore, breaks new ground by providing a tool for empirically measuring the therapeutic quality of interpersonal styles among judicial officers in Problem-Solving Court jurisdictions. Using original empirical data, recently collected from a Problem-Solving Court in England, the paper takes the reader through the journey of statistically validating the levied scaling systems on a theoretical tool, by performing Principal Component Analysis and Cronbach’s Alpha, to compound a ratified instrument. In doing so, the paper offers an original contribution to TJ methodology.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any references for this publication.