ChapterPDF Available

Architecture of the Early Settlement and Trends through the Cultural Sequence

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

The excavations of Aşıklı from 1989 through the early 2000s showcased the 8th millennium BC occupations of the site. Interpretations and evaluations of settlement layout, architectural characteristics, subsistence patterns, and social dimensions of the community have been based mainly on the data from these uppermost levels (Esin – Harmankaya 2007). For some time this was all that could be widely understood about the site and thus the only basis for scholarly discussion. Towards the end of that fieldwork campaign, however, further excavation in Area 4GH revealed the existence of earlier communities with rather different lifeways and distinct forms of architecture. Even so, these early occupations have remained poorly known and, for this reason, have not figured much in regional discussions of neolithization until now. The new program of fieldwork and research, begun in 2010, seeks to understand the whole developmental process at Aşıklı, gathering as much information as possible about the early habitation levels while ensuring data comparability to the Level 2 settlement. The first results of eight seasons of work (2010-2017) at the site provide an assessment of the long habitation history and detailed data on the early stages of sedentism, food-production and community behavior. The mostly gradual cultural and biological changes through this uninterrupted sequence prove that Aşıklı is among the earliest, longue durée formative Neolithic sites in Anatolia.
Content may be subject to copyright.
THE EARLY SETTLEMENT AT AŞIKLI HÖYÜK
Mihriban Özbaşaran Güneş Duru Mary Stiner
THE EARLY SETTLEMENT AT AŞIKLI HÖYÜK
Mihriban Özbaşaran Güneş Duru Mary Stiner
Essays in Honor of Ufuk Esin
THE EARLY SETTLEMENT AT
AŞIKLI HÖYÜK
Essays in Honor of Ufuk Esin
OFFPRINT
THE EARLY SETTLEMENT AT
AŞIKLI HÖYÜK
Essays in Honor of Ufuk Esin
Edited by
Mihriban Özbaşaran, Güneş Duru, Mary Stiner
THE EARLY SETTLEMENT AT AŞIKLI HÖYÜK
Essays in Honor of Ufuk Esin
Edited by
Mihriban Özbaşaran, Güneş Duru, Mary Stiner
© 2018 Ege Yayınları
ISBN 978-605-9680-83-7
Publisher Certificate No: 14641
Cover design
Adnan Elmasoğlu
Printed by
12. Matbaa
Nato Caddesi 14/1 Seyrantepe, Kağıthane / Istanbul - Turkey
Tel: +90 (212) 281 25 80 Fax: +90 (212) 283 79 25
Certificate No: 33094
Production and Distribution
Zero Prod. Ltd.
Abdullah Sokak No: 17 Taksim 34433 Istanbul - Turkey
Tel: +90 (212) 244 75 21 Fax: +90 (212) 244 32 09
info@zerobooksonline.com
www.zerobooksonline.com ; www.egeyayinlari.com.tr
National Science
Foundation
USA
University of Arizona
USA
İstanbul Üniversitesi
Institut für Paläoanatomie,
Domestikationsforschung und
Geschichte der Tiermedizin,
Ludwig-Maximilians Universität
München, Germany.
Contents
Preface ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ IX
Introduction to the Aşıklı Höyük Project
Mihriban Özbaşaran, Güneş Duru ................................................................................................................................................................................. 1
Geomorphological and Palaeoenvironmental Setting of Aşıklı Höyük
Catherine Kuzucuoğlu, Jean-Pascal Dumoulin, Ségolène Saulnier-Copard ............................................................... 15
Summary of Carbon-14 Dating of the Cultural Levels of Aşıklı Höyük
Jay Quade, Mary C. Stiner, Audrey Copeland, Amy E. Clark, Mihriban Özbaşaran ....................................... 43
Architecture of the Early Settlement and Trends through the Cultural Sequence
Mihriban Özbaşaran, Güneş Duru, Melis Uzdurum ............................................................................................................................. 57
Micromorphological Analyses of Anthropogenic Materials and Insights into Tell Formation
Processes at Aşıklı Höyük, 2008-2012 Field Seasons
Susan M. Mentzer ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 105
Multi-element Characterization of Floors at Aşıklı Höyük: Contributing to the Identification
of Activities and Activity Areas
Fatma Kalkan, Rana Özbal .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 129
The Microscopic Record of Aşıklı Höyük: Phytolith Analysis of Material from the
2012-2016 Field Seasons
Georgia Tsartsidou .................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 147
Plants of Aşıklı Höyük and Changes through Time: First Archaeobotanical Results from the
2010-14 Excavation Seasons
Müge Ergun, Margareta Tengberg, George Willcox, Carolyne Douché ....................................................................... 191
Spatial and Zooarchaeological Evidence of Human-Animal Interactions in the Early PPN
Settlement at Aşıklı Höyük
Mary C. Stiner, Kassi S. Bailey, Natalie D. Munro, Rozalia Christidou ........................................................................ 219
The Taphonomic Context of the Aşıklı Höyük Microfaunal Assemblage: Emergence of
Pest-Host and Commensal Relationships
Kassi S. Bailey .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 259
ContentsVI
The Faunal Remains from Levels 3 and 2 of Aşıklı Höyük: Evidence for Emerging
Management Practices
Hijlke Buitenhuis, Joris Peters, Nadja Pöllath, Mary C. Stiner, Natalie D. Munro,
Özlem Sarıtaş ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 281
Shaping the Sheep: Human Management and Decision-making at Aşıklı Höyük,
Central Anatolia
Joris Peters, Ferdinand Neuberger, Ingrid Wiechmann, Michaela Zimmermann,
Marie Balasse, Nadja Pöllath ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 325
Obsidian Use during the Level 4 Occupations at Aşıklı Höyük
Laurence Astruc (with artifact illustrations by Michel Grenet) ........................................................................................... 345
Aşıklı Höyük Obsidian Studies: Production, Use and Diachronic Changes
Nurcan Kayacan, Çiler Altınbilek-Algül ............................................................................................................................................................ 363
The Beads from Aşıklı Höyük
Sera Yelözer ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 383
Lifestyle and Health Conditions of the Neolithic People of Aşıklı Höyük
Ömür Dilek Erdal ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 405
Childhood Growth Disruptions at Aşıklı Höyük
Brenna Hassett .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 425
Conclusion
Mary C. Stiner, Mihriban Özbaşaran, Güneş Duru ............................................................................................................................ 437
Bibliography ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 445
Aşıklı Höyük Kazı ve Araştırma Projesi
www.asiklihoyuk.org
facebook.com/asiklihoyuk
instagram: @asiklihoyuk
Preface
Aşıklı Höyük, 26 years after it was first discovered, came under excavation by a large group
of scholars from Istanbul University led by Prof. Ufuk Esin, then the chair of the Department
of Prehistory. Results obtained from each field season contributed not only to our knowledge
of the cultural geography of the region, but also to increasingly pluralistic explanations of
Neolithization.
We began organizing a new program of investigation at the site in 2006, and we commenced
new excavations in 2010 with the aim of pursuing a more detailed understanding of trends first
identified by Prof. Esin and exploring more deeply what remained to be learned about Aşıklı.
We attempted to understand the individual actions and “snapshots” from the daily life of the
inhabitants with our revised approach and methodology. The new multi-disciplinary project
supported by researchers and scholars from all over the world not only enriched the intellectual
environment and helped to refine earlier interpretations, but also allowed us to put forward
new research questions and approaches. The revival of the project has also allowed younger
generations to be trained in many new aspects of archaeology.
Our recent investigations have focused mainly on the early habitation at Aşıklı. This work
contributes to the ongoing discussions on the Neolithization of Central Anatolia, together with
new data from the sites of Pınarbaşı and Boncuklu on the Konya Plain and Balıklı in Cappadocia.
Though mentioned only briefly in the present volume, we have also carried out parallel
projects in experimental archaeology, cultural heritage management, and public archaeology in
connection with the archaeological research. Other publications will follow the present volume
on the results gained from these sister projects.
Here it is our privilege to forward the first results of our work at Aşıklı in a volume dedicated
to Prof. Esin. We hope it will further stimulate Neolithic research in the region. The year 2019
represents the 30th anniversary of the start of the excavations at Aşıklı. After three decades of
fieldwork, we are proud to offer unprecedented information on the early inhabitants of Aşıklı.
We owe much thanks to all the former and current members of the project. However, our deepest
gratitude goes to esteemed scholar and mentor, Ufuk Esin, from whom we have inherited not
only the opportunity to continue archaeological research at Aşıklı but also the many scientific
approaches and ethical values she fostered. We present this book to her memory with respect,
love, and longing.
Architecture of the Early Settlement and
Trends through the Cultural Sequence
Mihriban ÖZBAŞARANa, Güneş DURUb and Melis UZDURUMa
Introduction
The excavations of Aşıklı from 1989 through the early 2000s showcased the 8th millennium
BC occupations of the site. Interpretations and evaluations of settlement layout, architectural
characteristics, subsistence patterns, and social dimensions of the community have been based
mainly on the data from these uppermost levels (Esin – Harmankaya 2007). For some time this
was all that could be widely understood about the site and thus the only basis for scholarly dis-
cussion. Towards the end of that fieldwork campaign, however, further excavation in Area 4GH
revealed the existence of earlier communities with rather different lifeways and distinct forms
of architecture. Even so, these early occupations have remained poorly known and, for this rea-
son, have not figured much in regional discussions of neolithization until now.
The new program of fieldwork and research, begun in 2010, seeks to understand the whole
developmental process at Aşıklı, gathering as much information as possible about the early
habitation levels while ensuring data comparability to the Level 2 settlement. The first results
of eight seasons of work (2010-2017) at the site provide an assessment of the long habitation
history and detailed data on the early stages of sedentism, food-production and community be-
havior. The mostly gradual cultural and biological changes through this uninterrupted sequence
prove that Aşıklı is among the earliest, longue durée formative Neolithic sites in Anatolia.
Methods
The methods for the Aşıklı Höyük excavations were based on procedures developed by Prof.
Ufuk Esin and her colleagues during salvage excavations around the Keban and Atatürk Dam
Projects in the late 1960s. The system had already been applied to the salvage excavations of
a Istanbul University, Faculty of Letters, Prehistory Department, 34134 Fatih, Istanbul, Turkey
b Galatasaray University, Ortaköy Mh., Çırağan Cad. No. 36, 34349 Beşiktaş, Istanbul, Turkey
Mihriban Özbaşaran, Güneş Duru and Melis Uzdurum58
Tepecik, Tülintepe, Değirmentepe and İkiz Höyük, all led by Esin between 1968-1987 (Esin
1970: 150). The field methods were based on a grid system with 10 x 10 m trenches oriented
on a north-south axis. The baulks between trenches provided vertical control sections for the
stratigraphy.
The excavations at Aşıklı Höyük began as a salvage project, and so similar methods of ex-
cavation and documentation were employed by Esin with only minor changes. The fieldwork
began in 1989 with mapping of the mound’s topographic plan and surface collection of arti-
facts. The overall dimensions of the mound, 150-240 m EW by 230 m NS and with a height of
13.16m on S end and 15.35 m on NW, were divided into 10 m squares in a grid defined by num-
bers (1, 2, 3…) for the west-east axis and letters (A, B, C…) for the north-south axis1 (Figure1).
Asurfacecollection was carried out within the grid. Each 10 x 10 m square was designated as a
“trench” (Esin et al. 1991: 127). Baulks of 50 cm width were left between the trenches in the be-
ginning, but erosion during the harsh winters soon convinced Esin to widen the baulks to 1m.
Thereafter, the excavation areas were expanded to expose larger areas, and trench sizes were
changed from 10 x 10 m to 10 x 20 m.
Esin’s primary objective in the fieldwork was to determine the mound’s stratigraphy and
reveal the settlement layout in Level 2 by exposing large areas (Esin et al. 1991: 126). The work
began on the north, west and southwestern areas of the mound where the Melendiz river had
cut into its sides. The northwest end of the mound corresponds to square 4H. The area on the
western edge of the mound was more steeply inclined and temporarily referred to as the Slope
Trench (2-3JK). The third the area on the southwest part of the mound declines gently to the
south and is known as 2-3N-R on the excavation grid.
The area of “Trench” 4GH was chosen for investigating the deeper stratigraphy of the mound.
The plan was to reach the earliest cultural level and the virgin soil below it. Architectural and
other remains would be thoroughly documented on encounter and then removed in order to
expose each underlying level/building phase. This method left high sections on three sides of
the excavation area, displaying the sequential development of the architecture. As the lower
levels were reached, the trench was expanded northward to the 4G and 4F grid boundary.
Modifications to the methodology after 2010 allowed us to work independently of the grids and
at a much finer scale; this deep “trench” is now referred to as Area 4GH.
Two small deep soundings in Area 4GH (Woldring 1998; Kuzucuoğlu, this volume) reached
the natural sedimentary layers beneath the archaeological deposits at -13.55m below datum
(the highest point on the mound is set to 0.00 m). Gravel deposits were reached at -15.62 m.
The modern water table of the river was reached in 1991 in the first sounding at -16.03 m2 (Esin
– Harmankaya 1992: 5).
The second area excavated during the 1989 field season was Trench 2-3JK. However, a dif-
ferent strategy was applied here, and no architectural remains were removed. The excavations in
Trench 2-3JK were also deep on account of the slope deposited post-culturally by the river, but
1 The large trenches in the grid were sub-divided into smaller units, named with numbers 1 to 10 from west to east,
and with letters a to k from north to south. For example, unit 5-10/a-e in the 4H trench designated an area of 5 x
5 m or 25 m2. The disadvantages of the grid system, especially its insensitivity to human-defined spaces, led us to
abandon it for the new excavation beginning in 2010.
2 The highest point on the mound (datum point 0.00 at the intersection point of grids 6-7 and H-J; Figure 1) is
1119.58 m above sea level. All elevations mentioned in this volume indicate the height below the datum point.
Architecture of the Early Settlement and Trends through the Cultural Sequence 59
the highest architectural remains in the deposits were exposed in a step-like configuration down
the slope. The boundary of the trench was extended in the following years to the west to expose
the buildings and open spaces over a larger area. Hence, the former grid boundaries were disre-
garded, and the limits of the excavation area were instead defined by the architectural remains.
With the elimination of the trench system, the area is now called Area 2JK.
The third location targeted for excavation in 1989 was placed in grid squares 2-4NR (Esin
et al. 1991: 129). Excavations followed a distinct trajectory in this area on account of the unu-
sual structures and remains exposed during the first field season, most notably the large lime
plastered and painted floors. The boundaries of the trenches were rearranged to include en-
tire structures and floors within the excavation zone. The area is presently called the Special
Purpose Buildings Area (SPBA), and today is protected by a large shelter (see Özbaşaran and
Duru, this volume).
Excavations continued in all three locations after 1989, and new areas were added. The ad-
ditional areas included squares 13R-S, 17S, 10UV, and 14AA. Square 13R-S covered an area of
Figure 1. Topographic plan of Aşıklı Höyük and the settlement layout in Level 2A-C.
... Aşıklı Höyük'te süreklilik olgusu topluluğu bir arada tutan ve yerleşik yaşamı sürdürülebilir kılan temel unsur olmuştur (Duru, 2018;Özbaşaran, Duru & Uzdurum, 2018). Öyle ki bu olgu, ölü gömmeden alet teknolojisine, mimariden yapı malzemelerine dek pek çok bağlamda karşımıza çıkar. ...
Chapter
Full-text available
Çevre, bir yanıyla benligimizi asan ve ekosistemin parçası olarak konumumuzu belirleyen dısarıdaki dünya, diger yanıyla bize aidiyet duygusu, bütünün bir parçası olma gibi çıktılar sunan, bireysel ve kolektif kimligimizi yaratan ve yansıtan yasam alanları... Içinde bulundugumuz yapılı çevreyi nasıl deneyimleyip dönüstürdügümüzden izler tasıyan kerpiç, tarihöncesinden günümüze hemen her dönemde ve uygun iklim sartlarına sahip cografyalarda sıklıkla karsımıza çıkan materyal kültür ögelerindendir. Bu denli yaygın olması sasırtıcı degildir, çünkü kaynagı yerkürede hali hazırda bulunan, çesitli katkı malzemeleri ve baglayıcılarla harmanlanabilen ve geri dönüstürülebilir bir malzemedir. Kerpicin kurutulduktan sonra ulastıgı son hal iklimsel kosullardan hammadde kaynaklarına, katkı malzemelerinden bunların oranlanmasına, biçim verilmesine dek yüzlerce degisken ve olasılıgın benzersiz bir sonucudur. Tam da bu nedenle yapımcısının estetik algısı, bilgi, tecrübe, tabu, yasanmıslık ve tercihlerinden imzalar tasır. Kerpiç hazırlıgının ve yapı insasının fiziksel olarak zorlayıcı, zaman alan, uzmanlık, is bölümü ve organizasyon gerektiren bir eylem olarak insanlara çok farklı deneyimler yasattıgı, sosyal ortamlar sagladıgı da kuskusuzdur. Bu noktada kerpiç, yapı malzemesi olmanın ötesinde günümüzde oldugu gibi geçmiste de bireysel ve kolektif kimliklerin yansıtıldıgı somut birer ifade aracına dönüsür. Son yıllarda kerpiçler üzerinde uygulanmaya baslayan üretim zincirine (chaîne opératoire) odaklı yaklasım ve yöntemler bu ifade biçiminin mikro göstergelerini saptama, kültürel kimliklere ve normlara iliskin bilgimizin sınırlarını genisletme potansiyeline sahiptir. Landscape, one hand, is the world out there that out of identity and determines our position as part of an ecosystem. On the other hand, it is a living space that creates and reflects individual and collective identities, offering outputs such as of belonging, being a part of the whole. Kerpiç (mudbrick) which includes the marks of how experience and changed this built environment we are inside, is encountered in almost every period from prehistoric to the present and in geographies with convenient climatic conditions. It is not surprising that it is so widespread, because earthen material is a recyclable building material whose source is available around the world, that can be modified with various temper and binders. Meanwhile the final state of kerpiç after drying is a unique result of hundreds of variables and possibilities ranging from climatic conditions to raw material, from temper and binders to proportioning and shaping of them. For this reason, they include signatures from maker’s sense of aesthetics, knowledge, experiences, taboos, memories, and preferences. Undoubtedly, kerpiç making and building construction are physically demanding, time consuming, requiring specialization and labor organization and have provided people with different experiences and social environments. In this context, kerpiç becomes a physical means of expression reflecting individual and collective identities beyond being a building material. The production chain (chaîne opératoire) focused approaches and methods that have been conducted on earthen material become more common in archaeology to understand micro indicators of this concrete expression and expand the limits of our knowledge of cultural identities and norms.
Conference Paper
Full-text available
Bu çalışmada, Aşıklı Höyük'teki makro ölçekteki mimari sonuçlardan yola çıkılarak, Aşıklı topluluğunun geç 9. binyıl yaşamında (MÖ 8400-7750) yerel çevreden yararlanma biçimleri konusundaki yaklaşımları, kerpiç ve harç reçetelerini buna bağlı olarak nasıl oluşturduklarına odaklanılmıştır. Bu bağlamda Taramalı Elektron Mikroskobu-Enerji Dağılımı X-ışını Spektroskopisi ve ince kesit (arkeolojik mikromorfoloji) analizleri ile bina duvarlarındaki çökelti kaynağının incelenmesi, katkı ve bağlayıcıların tanımlanması, karma, şekillendirme sürecinin anlaşılması hedeflenmiştir.
Article
Full-text available
İnsan yaşamında bilişsel ve teknolojik gelişimin en önemli aşaması, çocukluk dönemidir. Buna karşın tarih öncesi toplulukların dünyasında çocuklar, genelde ihmal edilen bir alan olmuştur. Bu konuda araştırma azlığının nedeni, çalışmaların genellikle tarih öncesi toplulukların sosyo-ekonomik dünyalarını meydana getiren temel aktiviteler olan tarım, hayvancılık, avcılık-toplayıcılık ve çeşitli zanaatlar gibi çoğunlukla fiziksel güç ve bilişsel beceri gerektiren konulara odaklanmış olmasıdır. Bu nedenle, çoğu zaman arkeologlar için, örneğin Neolitik bir köy, besin üretimi ile meşgul olan yetişkin bireylerle özdeştir. Çocuklar ise üretim faaliyetlerinin aktif bir parçası olmaya başladıkları belirli bir yaşa gelene dek toplumun en pasif halkası olarak görülürler. Ancak, etnografik ve arkeolojik çalışmalar, yetişkin bireylerin gündelik sorumluluklara ve zanaatlara ilişkin bilgi ve becerilerinin gelişimi, bireyin seçeceği uzmanlık, topluluk içindeki kimlik ve rollerinin çocukluk döneminde oluşmaya başladığını göstermektedir. Bu nedenle tarih öncesi bir topluluğu anlamak için çocukların dünyasını anlamak en az yetişkin bireyler kadar önemlidir. Bu makale, bundan 10 bin yıl öncelerinde Aşıklı Höyük’te doğan ve ölen çocuklar üzerinedir. Bebek ve çocuklara dair iskelet verilerinin yanı sıra yontma taş (obsidiyen) işçiliği üzerine yürütülen teknolojik analizler sonucunda, çocukların da üretim süreci içerisinde yer aldıkları saptanmış ve böylelikle çocuklar, arkeolojik veriler vasıtasıyla görünür kılınmıştır. Çalışmada, son veriler ışığında, Aşıklı topluluğunun bin yıllık uzun ve kesintisiz iskân tarihinde bebeklerin ve çocukların yeri ve biyolojik ve sosyal kimlikleri ele alınmaktadır.
Article
Full-text available
This article illustrates how changes in the sediment source, tempering strategies, and shaping process in early Neolithic earthen architecture in Aşıklı Höyük have a major impact on many aspects of techno-environmental know-how traces. Archaeological micromorphology analyses of sun-dried mudbricks (in Turkey, called a specific term: kerpiç), mortars, daub, and their paleoenvi-ronmental contexts were used to examine the tempo and modes of exploitation of the local environment, and chaîne opératoire of kerpiç and mortar recipes, and the possible reasons behind the relationships among material choices, building forms, and wall construction techniques of the earlier inhabitants in Central Anatolia during the establishment of the early settlement, i.e., 8400-7750 BCE. The nature of and changes in the built environment can be traced especially through the mortar recipes that provide various insights into the agro-pastoral activities at the site, including middens, open areas, and penning deposits. During the early Neolithic occupation at Aşıklı Höyük, vegetal tempering occurred as a micro-invention and was developed in relation to the management of fecal and domestic waste used in construction materials. Furthermore, the variability of tempering strategies can be regarded as a cognitive development that resulted from the long-term learning and experimentation background of the Aşıklı people in kerpiç production. The main motivation behind these changes and testing of the recipes was the need for more durable and long-lasting construction of earthen buildings as used by this early sedentary community in the region.
Article
Full-text available
Using case studies from Aşıklı Höyük, Çatalhöyük, Boncuklu Tarla, Göbekli Tepe (all Turkey), and Monjukli Depe (southern Turkmenistan), this study presents a framework for in-depth research on prehistoric earthen architecture in southwestern and central Asia. It demonstrates the challenges and potential for innovative and comparative studies based on interdisciplinary approaches and the use of architectural, microstratigraphic, and microarchaeological analyses. Furthermore, it sheds new light on issues related to various aspects of building continuity which is commonly recognised as a very important phenomenon in the Neolithic but could have different facets. The study attempts to discuss the reasons behind the local decisions to use and recycle specified building materials. In addition, it evaluates – in relation to particular sites – the usefulness of specific analyses for reconstruction of daily, seasonal, or annual practices. Advanced analyses of floors and fire installations, for instance, can contribute not only to the identification of indoor and outdoor surfaces but also to a better understanding of activity areas and the intensity of use within particular spaces. Variations and different combinations of mudbrick, mortar, and plaster recipes allow for insights into how earth and sediment material were used to mark collective and individual identity through the performance of a building. Recognising reused materials and features allows us to trace further the nature of prehistoric societies and local architectural dialects.
Preprint
Full-text available
This article illustrates how changes in the sediment source, tempering strategies, and shaping process in early Neolithic earthen architecture in Aşıklı Höyük have a major impact on many aspects of techno-environmental know-how traces. Archaeological micromorphology analyses of sun-dried mudbricks (in Turkey, called a specific term: kerpiç), mortars, daub, and their paleoenvironmental contexts were used to examine the tempo and modes of exploitation of the local environment, and chaîne opératoire of kerpiç and mortar recipes, and the possible reasons behind the relationships among material choices, building forms, and wall construction techniques of the earlier inhabitants in Central Anatolia during the establishment of the early settlement, i.e. 8400-7750 BCE. The nature of and changes in the built environment can be traced especially through the mortar recipes, that provide various insights into the agro-pastoral activities at the site, including middens, open areas, and penning deposits. During the early Neolithic occupation at Aşıklı Höyük, vegetal tempering occurs as a micro-invention was developed in relation with the management of fecal and domestic waste used in construction materials. Furthermore, the variability of tempering strategies can be regarded as a cognitive development that resulted from the long-term learning and experimentation background of the Aşıklı people in kerpiç production. The main motivation behind these changes and testing of the recipes was the need for more durable and long-lasting construction of earthen buildings as used by this early sedentary community in the region.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any references for this publication.