ArticlePublisher preview available

Correction to: Incarceration and Personal Networks: Unpacking Measures and Meanings of Tie Strength

Authors:
Andres F. Rengifo
Andres F. Rengifo
Andres F. Rengifo
  • This person is not on ResearchGate, or hasn't claimed this research yet.
Samuel DeWitt at University of North Carolina at Charlotte
Samuel DeWitt
Read publisher preview
Download citation
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the authors.

Abstract

The original version of the article contained an error in the text. The corrected text should read as. © 2019, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
A preview of this full-text is provided by Springer Nature.
Learn more
Content available from Journal of Quantitative Criminology
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Vol.:(0123456789)
Journal of Quantitative Criminology (2019) 35:433
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-018-9402-0
1 3
CORRECTION
Correction to: Incarceration andPersonal Networks:
Unpacking Measures andMeanings ofTie Strength
AndresF.Rengifo1· SamuelE.DeWitt2
Published online: 7 January 2019
© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019
Correction to: Journal of Quantitative Criminology
https ://doi.org/10.1007/s1094 0-018-9391-z
The original version of the article contained an error in the text.
The corrected text should read as:
A similar pattern may be observed for multiplexity, although likely related to a different
underlying mechanism—scores for former prisoners may be higher as this status is likely to
increase the growing scope of their social needs while simultaneously narrowing the pool
from which these demands may be met (Harding etal. 2014)—a process akin to the ‘edg-
ing’ of instrumental associations described by Goffman (2014). The inverse pattern may
be observed in the case of indirect exposure to incarceration, as egos reallocate exchanges
across more explicit contacts.
Publisher’s Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and
institutional affiliations.
The original article can be found online at https ://doi.org/10.1007/s1094 0-018-9391-z.
* Andres F. Rengifo
arengifo@scj.rutgers.edu
1 School ofCriminal Justice, Rutgers University- Newark, 123 Washington Street, Newark,
NJ07102, USA
2 Department ofCriminal Justice andCriminology, University ofNorth Carolina - Charlotte, 9201
University City Blvd, Charlotte, NC28223, USA
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
... Finally, barriers to prenatal care such as keeping a pregnancy secret or being unaware of the pregnancy were also elevated among incarceration exposed women. Incarceration is a well-documented strain on romantic partnerships [55], as well as social relationships more generally [56]. Moreover, prior research finds that incarceration exposed populations document patterns of jealousy and suspicions pertaining to sexual infidelity of their partners [40]. ...
Incarceration Exposure and Barriers to Prenatal Care in the United States: Findings from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System
Article
Full-text available
Previous research demonstrates that exposure to incarceration during pregnancy-either personally or vicariously through a partner-worsens parental care. However, little is known about the specific barriers to parental care that are associated with incarceration exposure. Using data from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (years 2009-2016), the current study examines the relationship between exposure to incarceration during pregnancy and barriers to prenatal care in the United States. Negative binomial and logistic regression models were used to assess the association between the recent incarceration of a woman or her partner (i.e., incarceration that occurred in the 12 months prior to the focal birth) and several barriers to prenatal care. Findings indicate that exposure to incarceration, either personally or vicariously through a partner, increases the overall number of barriers to prenatal care and this association operates through several specific barriers including a lack of transportation to doctor's appointments, having difficulty finding someone to take care of her children, being too busy, keeping pregnancy a secret, and a woman not knowing she was pregnant. Policies designed to help incarceration exposed women overcome these barriers can potentially yield benefits for enhancing access to prenatal care.
View
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any references for this publication.