Chapter

“Britain’s Most Romantic Museum”?: Lesbian Spectatorship and the Reception of Historic Figural Sculpture at the V&A: Encounters in Literature, Culture and the Arts from the Eighteenth Century to the Present

January 2019

DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-95840-8_11

In book: Sculpture, Sexuality and History (pp.245-267)

Authors:

Sotheby's Institute of Art

This chapter explores how late nineteenth- and early twentieth-century sculptures of the female nude on display in the V&A may craft an enabling space for female viewers’ experience of homoerotic desire. It problematises the term ‘lesbian spectatorship’ as it relates to theories of ‘the gaze’ and examines the display of single, nude female figures to consider how a visual dialogue between historical sculptures and contemporary viewers might mobilise lesbian desire to disrupt the sociocultural, historically specific heterosexual masculine visual economy in which they were produced. The chapter draws attention to the lack of association between the female nude and female same-sex desire in art historical scholarship and considers the connection between representation of erotic intimacy between female figures in sculpture and female homoerotic, scopophilic pleasure.

ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.

ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any references for this publication.

Article

Distance and Desire in the New British Queer History

January 2008 · GLQ A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies

Chris Waters

In October 2005, BBC Radio 4's talk show Thinking Allowed brought together Matt Houlbrook and Jeffrey Weeks to discuss Houlbrook's recently published book, Queer London: Perils and Pleasures in the Sexual Metropolis, 1918–1957. The recipient of both the prestigious Longman/History Today Book of the Year Award and the Royal Historical Society's Whitfield Prize for the best first book in any area ... [Show full abstract] of British history, Queer London is one of four works under review here that collectively move in new directions in charting the history of same-sex desire between men in nineteenth- and twentieth-century Britain. Repudiating those modern categories of identity such as "gay" and "homosexual" (as well as "straight" and "heterosexual")—because, he argues, they position male sexual practices and emotional desires "within a particular interpretive framework that cannot be imposed straightforwardly on the past"—Houlbrook insists on using "the rubric 'queer' to denote all erotic and affective interactions between men and all men who engaged in such interactions" in Britain prior to the 1960s (xiii). In this respect Queer London is a very different kind of book from Weeks's equally pioneering and important study, now thirty years old, Coming Out: Homosexual Politics in Britain, from the Nineteenth Century to the Present. Born in 1975, exactly thirty years after Weeks, Houlbrook did not live through the tumultuous years of the early 1970s—the period that, for Weeks, marked "the turning-point in the evolution of a homosexual consciousness." He did not experience the Gay Liberation Front that so shaped Weeks's own politics and informed both his understanding of the recent past and the subsequent history he wrote; indeed, Houlbrook was only two years old when Coming Out hit the bookstores. As a consequence of writing at a very different historical and theoretical moment, and in the context of the more recent proliferation of historical studies of the queer past (by North Americans, at least), Houlbrook focuses on radically different concerns. Whereas Weeks looked to the past in order to discover the origins and trace the history of a modern "homosexual consciousness" in Britain (despite being keenly aware of differences across time), Houlbrook discovers in that past men with affective ties to each other that could not in any sense be subsumed under categories of consciousness and identity that we would easily recognize today; whereas Weeks charted successes and failures on the road to homosexual self-recognition, self-acceptance, and emancipation, Houlbrook sees his task in less teleological terms, desiring to piece together "the historical production of diverse modes of sexual difference" in London between the end of the First World War and the start of the campaign to decriminalize homosexuality in the wake of the publication of the Wolfenden Report at the end of the 1950s (8). Differentiated by their approaches to the past, Weeks and Houlbrook also differ in their assessments of the past about which they write. Indeed, Houlbrook plays the role of the bad boy on the block, subverting received understandings of the very meaning of same-sex desire in early-twentieth-century Britain. He is, for example, clearly nostalgic for various modes of queer identification in London that have been marginalized by the consolidation of the modern gay subject. He concludes his study in elegiac terms and argues that in "exploring the history of queer London in the first half of the twentieth century, we should lament possibilities long lost as much as we celebrate opportunities newly acquired" (271). It is precisely this nostalgia for lost possibilities that does not sit well with Weeks. Pressed on his attitude toward the past at the end of their BBC discussion, Houlbrook says, "I think I'm going to have to admit being very nostalgic for this lost world," to which Weeks quickly responds, "I think you can only be nostalgic if you didn't live it. . . . Those of us who had the misfortune to live that life until the 1970s don't feel nostalgic about it." Weeks's comment calls attention to how Houlbrook's work disrupts a particular tradition in the writing of gay and lesbian history—just as the lives and loves of the queer men he...

Article

Full-text available

Relaxing the straight male anus: Decreasing homohysteria around anal eroticism

February 2017 · Sexualities

This study examines the practice and perception of receptive anal eroticism among 170 heterosexual undergraduate men in a US university. We analyze the social stigmas on men’s anal pleasure through the concept of homohysteria, which describes a cultural myth that the wrongdoing of gender casts homosexual suspicion onto heterosexual men. For men’s anal eroticism, this means that only gay, ... [Show full abstract] emasculated or gender deviant men are thought to enjoy anal pleasure. We suggest, however, that decreasing homohysteria has begun to erode this cultural ‘ban’ on anal stimulation for straight men. Our data finds self-identified straight university-aged men questioning cultural narratives that conflate anal receptivity with homosexuality and emasculation. We also show that 24 percent of our respondents have, at least once, received anal pleasure. These results suggest that cultural taboos around men’s anal pleasure may be shifting for younger men and the boundaries of straight identity expanding. We call for further research to clarify how anal erotic norms are shifting among men of different racial, geographic, socioeconomic, and age demographics, and to determine how these shifts may foster more pluralistic and inclusive views of gender and sexuality.

Article

Full-text available

Queering Street: Homosociality, Masculinity, and Disability in Friday Night Lights

August 2013 · Western Journal of Communication

Gender and ability are integral to the cultural significance of sport, but contemporary media depictions of high school athletes rarely direct attention to the interaction of these issues. In contrast, the critically acclaimed television series Friday Night Lights (FNL) presents a complex and problematic portrayal of masculinity, disability, and sport. Our analysis explores how its disability ... [Show full abstract] imagery and themes obscure displays that inform a subtext of homoerotics. Bringing queer and disability theory together, we craft a lens for reading the show's coordination of compulsory able-bodiedness and compulsory heterosexuality. Using Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick's analysis of homosociality to discuss specific erotic triangles in FNL's first season, we examine how its displays of homosocial desire and disability interact. Erotic triangles appear throughout the series and generate much of the show's dramatic appeal. A central plotline of the first season revolves around high school quarterback Jason Street, who becomes quadriplegic after a football injury in the pilot episode. Street's disability changes his relationships with the other main characters and dramatically transforms his place in the show's erotic triangles. Reading Street's disability story as a queer narrative, we emphasize the series’ display of contests between homosociality and homoerotics, emasculation and rehabilitation, and athletics and disability.