ArticlePDF Available

Correction: Medical-Grade Physical Activity Monitoring for Measuring Step Count and Moderate-to-Vigorous Physical Activity: Validity and Reliability Study

Authors:

Abstract

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.2196/10706.].
Corrigenda and Addenda
Correction: Medical-Grade Physical Activity Monitoring for
Measuring Step Count and Moderate-to-Vigorous Physical Activity:
Validity and Reliability Study
Myles William O'Brien1,2, BKinH; William Robert Wojcik1, BKinH; Jonathon Richard Fowles1, PhD
1Centre of Lifestyle Studies, School of Kinesiology, Acadia University, Wolfville, NS, Canada
2Division of Kinesiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
Corresponding Author:
Jonathon Richard Fowles, PhD
Centre of Lifestyle Studies, School of Kinesiology
Acadia University
550 Main Street
Wolfville, NS,
Canada
Phone: 1 9025851560
Fax: 1 902 585 1702
Email: jonathon.fowles@acadiau.ca
Related Article:
Correction of: http://mhealth.jmir.org/2018/9/e10706/
(JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2019;7(1):e12576) doi: 10.2196/12576
The Authors of “Medical-Grade Physical Activity Monitoring
for Measuring Step Count and Moderate-to-Vigorous Physical
Activity: Validity and Reliability Study” (JMIR Mhealth Uhealth
2018;6(9):e10706) mistakenly represented the Yamax
Digiwalker in the Discussion section. Unlike some of Yamax’s
newer devices (ie, Yamax EX-510), the Yamax Digiwalker is
a spring-levered pedometer and not a piezoelectric pedometer.
Thus, the following sentence has been removed from the
Discussion:
Similar to the PiezoRx, the Yamax also uses a
piezoelectric sensor, which is consistent with this
study.
The correction will appear in the online version of the paper
on the JMIR website on January 3, 2019, together with the
publication of this correction notice. Because this was made
after submission to PubMed, PubMed Central, and other full-text
repositories, the corrected article also has been resubmitted to
those repositories.
Edited by G Eysenbach; this is a non–peer-reviewed article. Submitted 22.10.18; accepted 25.10.18; published 03.01.19.
Please cite as:
O'Brien MW, Wojcik WR, Fowles JR
Correction: Medical-Grade Physical Activity Monitoring for Measuring Step Count and Moderate-to-Vigorous Physical Activity:
Validity and Reliability Study
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2019;7(1):e12576
URL: https://mhealth.jmir.org/2019/1/e12576/
doi: 10.2196/12576
PMID: 30609987
©Myles William O'Brien, William Robert Wojcik, Jonathon Richard Fowles. Originally published in JMIR Mhealth and Uhealth
(http://mhealth.jmir.org), 03.01.2019. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution
License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any
medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR mhealth and uhealth, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2019 | vol. 7 | iss. 1 | e12576 | p. 1https://mhealth.jmir.org/2019/1/e12576/ (page number not for citation purposes)
O'Brien et alJMIR MHEALTH AND UHEALTH
XSL
FO
RenderX
information, a link to the original publication on http://mhealth.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must
be included.
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2019 | vol. 7 | iss. 1 | e12576 | p. 2https://mhealth.jmir.org/2019/1/e12576/ (page number not for citation purposes)
O'Brien et alJMIR MHEALTH AND UHEALTH
XSL
FO
RenderX
Article
Context: Return to sport is widely utilized by sports medicine researchers and clinicians as a primary outcome of interest for successful recovery when working with young patients who have undergone anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR). While return-to-sport outcomes are effective at tracking progress post-ACLR, they are limited because they do not necessarily capture physical activity (PA) engagement, which is important to maintain knee joint health and reduce the risk of noncommunicable diseases. Therefore, there is a critical need (1) to describe current PA participation and measurement recommendations; (2) to appraise common PA measurement approaches, including patient-reported outcomes and device-based methodologies; and (3) to provide clinical recommendations for future evaluation. Evidence acquisition: Reports of patient-reported or device-based PA in patients with ACL injury were acquired and summarized based on a PubMed search (2000 through July 2020). Search terms included physical activity OR activity AND anterior cruciate ligament OR ACL. Study design: Clinical review. Level of evidence: Level 5. Results: We highlight that (1) individuals with ACLR are 2.36 times less likely to meet the US Department of Health and Human Services PA recommendations even when reporting successful return to sport, (2) common patient-reported PA assessments have significant limitations in the data that can be derived, and (3) alternative patient-reported and device-based assessments may provide improved assessment of PA in this patient population. Conclusion: Clinicians and researchers have relied on return to sport status or self-reported PA participation via surveys. These approaches are not consistent with current recommendations for PA assessment and do not allow for comparison with contemporary PA recommendations or guidelines. Return to sport, patient-reported outcome measures, and device-based assessment approaches should be used in complementary manners to comprehensively assess PA participation after ACLR. However, appropriate techniques should be used when assessing PA in adult and adolescent populations.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any references for this publication.