Content uploaded by Katerina Fliegerová
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Katerina Fliegerová on Feb 11, 2020
Content may be subject to copyright.
Anaerobic fungal communities differ along the horse digestive tract
Erica Mura
a
,
1
, Joan Edwards
b
, Sandra Kittelmann
c
, Kerstin Kaerger
d
,
e
, Kerstin Voigt
d
,
e
,
Jakub Mr
azek
f
, Giuseppe Moniello
a
, Katerina Fliegerova
f
,
*
a
Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Sassari, Via Vienna 2, 07100 Sassari, Italy
b
Laboratory of Microbiology, Wageningen University &Research, Wageningen, 6708 WE, the Netherlands
c
Wilmar International Ltd., Wil@NUS Corporate Lab, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117599, Singapore
d
Institute of Microbiology, University of Jena, Neugasse 25, 07743 Jena, Germany
e
Leibniz Institute for Natural Product Research and Infection Biology, Jena Microbial Resource Collection, Adolf-Reichwein-Str. 23, 07745 Jena, Germany
f
Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics, CAS, Víde
nsk
a 1083, Prague 14220, Czech Republic
article info
Article history:
Received 23 July 2018
Received in revised form
23 November 2018
Accepted 19 December 2018
Available online 27 December 2018
Corresponding Editor: Pieter van West
Keywords:
Anaerobic fungi
Diversity
Equine hindgut
ITS1
Uncultured
abstract
Anaerobic fungi are potent fibre degrading microbes in the equine hindgut, yet our understanding of
their diversity and community structure is limited to date. In this preliminary work, using a clone library
approach we studied the diversity of anaerobic fungi along six segments of the horse hindgut: caecum,
right ventral colon (RVC), left ventral colon (LVC), left dorsal colon (LDC), right dorsal colon (RDC) and
rectum. Of the 647 ITS1 clones, 61.7 % were assigned to genus level groups that are so far without any
cultured representatives, and 38.0 % were assigned to the cultivated genera Neocallimastix (35.1 %),
Orpinomyces (2.3 %), and Anaeromyces (0.6 %). AL1 dominated the group of uncultured anaerobic fungi,
particularly in the RVC (88 %) and LDC (97 %). Sequences from the LSU clone library analysis of the LDC,
however, split into two distinct phylogenetic clusters with low sequence identity to Caecomyces sp. (94
e96 %) and Liebetanzomyces sp. (92 %) respectively. Sequences belonging to cultured Neocallimastix spp.
dominated in LVC (81 %) and rectum (75.5 %). Quantification of anaerobic fungi showed significantly
higher concentrations in RVC and RDC compared to other segments, which influenced the interpretation
of the changes in anaerobic fungal diversity along the horse hindgut. These preliminary findings require
further investigation.
©2019 British Mycological Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Horses evolved as free-ranging herbivores of grassland envi-
ronments, with an enlarged hindgut adaptation enabling them to
obtain energy and nutrients from plant structural polysaccharides
through microbial fermentation. The hindgut is comprised of two
main fermentative chambers, the caecum and colon, which
together constitute two-thirds of the volume of the digestive tract.
The hindgut has a combined capacity of over 200 L (Frape, 2010)
and accounts for 75 % of the mean transit time (23e48h) of dietary
particles (van Weyenberg et al., 2006). The hindgut is home to
bacteria, anaerobic fungi, methanogenic archaea and protozoa. Of
these, the anaerobic fungi (Neocallimastigomycetes) are the most
potent in terms of degrading plant fibres due to their complete and
very efficient set of plant cell-wall degradation enzymes (Gruninger
et al., 2014; Haitjema et al., 2014). Despite their presence in the
horse hindgut within a few weeks of birth (Julliand et al., 1996),
almost all the current knowledge of anaerobic fungi is derived from
ruminant based studies.
Nine genera of anaerobic fungi validly described based on
cultivated representatives, including those with filamentous mon-
ocentric (Neocallimastix,Piromyces,Oontomyces and Buwchfa-
wromyces), filamentous polycentric (Orpinomyces,Anaeromyces and
Pecoramyces) and bulbous (Caecomyces and Cyllamyces) mycelium
(Gruninger et al., 2014; Edwards et al., 2017), have been recently
extended by new monocentric genera Feramyces (Hanafy et al.,
2018) and Liebetanzomyces (Joshi et al., 2018). These genera, how-
ever, represent only part of anaerobic fungal diversity as indicated
by the large and growing numbers of internal transcribed spacer
region 1 (ITS1) sequences in public databases that belong to
*Corresponding author. Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics, Czech
Academy of Sciences, Víde
nsk
a 1083, Prague 14220, Czech Republic.
Fax: þ420267090500.
E-mail address: fliegerova@iapg.cas.cz (K. Fliegerova).
1
All the authors contributed equally to this work.
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Fungal Biology
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/funbio
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.funbio.2018.12.004
1878-6146/©2019 British Mycological Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Fungal Biology 123 (2019) 240e246
potentially novel, as yet uncultured clades within the Neo-
callimastigomycetes. Based on the re-evaluation of publicly avail-
able ITS1 sequences, which took into account both primary
sequence and secondary structure information, Kittelmann et al.
(2012) and later Koetschan et al. (2014) proposed a revised phy-
logeny and pragmatic taxonomy of anaerobic fungi, which resulted
in 37 reproducible species or genus-level clades. Eighteen of these
clades have not been cultured, containing only environmental
derived sequences, and the number of not yet cultivated clades was
recently increased to twenty-five (Paul et al., 2018).
A survey of anaerobic fungi in faeces of 30 different ruminant
and non-ruminant herbivore species, found that members of the
family Equidae clustered apart from the other non-Equidae herbi-
vores studied (Liggenstoffer et al., 2010). The different domesti-
cated and non-domesticated equines sampled in the Liggenstoffer
et al. (2010) study shared a similar anaerobic fungal community,
which was mainly composed of two novel genus level groups that
are now termed AL1 &AL3 (Koetschan et al., 2014). Cultivated
anaerobic fungal genera were found in equine samples only in
limited relative abundance (4e12 % of Caecomyces,2%ofNeo-
callimastix, 0.3 % of Piromyces,0.1e0.3 % of Anaeromyces). These
results suggest that the digestive tract of horses is largely occupied
by novel, as yet uncultured anaerobic fungi, which differ from those
previously described from foregut herbivores.
Whilst molecular based analysis of equine anaerobic fungal di-
versity has been performed on faecal samples (Liggenstoffer et al.,
2010), it is known that bacterial, protozoal and archaeal commu-
nity composition differs with hindgut segment (Julliand and
Grimm, 2016; Fliegerova et al., 2016). Therefore, there is a clear
need to assess if the anaerobic fungal community composition also
differs along the hindgut, particularly as niche differentiation
within the anaerobic fungi has previously been proposed (Griffith
et al., 2009). In this preliminary study, the anaerobic fungal com-
munity composition along the hindgut of a mature horse was
determined using ITS1 based clone libraries.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Collection of digesta samples from the horse hindgut
Gut content samples were taken from the six segments of the
hindgut of an Anglo-Arabian gelded male (24 y old) euthanised for
non-research purposes in a local abattoir. The horse was main-
tained on a mixed diet of grass, meadow hay and complementary
feed as described by Fliegerova et al. (2016), and was healthy with
no history of any intestinal disorders. The segments sampled were:
caecum, right ventral colon (RVC), left ventral colon (LVC), left
dorsal colon (LDC), right dorsal colon (RDC) and rectum (repre-
senting faeces). Gut segments were tied off to prevent mixing be-
tween neighbouring segments, and the whole content from a
section mixed thoroughly before a sample (approx 500 g) was
taken. Samples were placed in labelled plastic containers and
transported on wet ice back to the laboratory where they were
frozen (at 20
C) and then freeze-dried. Freeze-dried material was
stored at 20
C until DNA extraction.
2.2. DNA extraction
Freeze-dried gut content (5 g) was homogenized using a mortar
and pestle with liquid nitrogen. Genomic DNA was then extracted
from 400 mg of the resulting powder using the cetyl-
trimethylammonium bromide extraction protocol of Gardes and
Bruns (1993) after modification with the respect to the amount of
sample material used. The concentration and purity of extracted
nucleic acids was checked using a NanoDrop 2000c UV-Vis
spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, U.S.A), and DNA extracts
were stored at 20
C until use.
2.3. PCR amplification
Amplification of the anaerobic fungal ITS1 region from each
sample was carried out with the combination of the fungal uni-
versal ITS1 forward primer (Gardes and Bruns, 1993) and the
Neocallimastigomycetes specific 5.8S rRNA gene reverse primer
(Edwards et al., 2008). This resulted in an amplicon of approxi-
mately 350 bp in length, as described previously by Fliegerova et al.
(2010). The PCR reaction (50
m
l) was performed with a PPP Master
Mix kit (Top-Bio, Czech Republic) and 0.3
m
M of each primer using
the following thermal cycling conditions: 33 cycles of denaturation
at 94
C for 1 min, annealing at 58
C for 30 s and extension at 72
C
for 45 s with an initial cycle of 94
C for 4 min and final cycle of
72
C for 2 min. Each sample was PCR amplified in quadruplicate
and then pooled after successful amplification and verified by
agarose gel electrophoresis.
For one sample, the LDC, the ribosomal large subunit 28S rRNA
(LSU) was also amplified in quadruplicate with universal primers
NL1 and NL4 as described previously by Fliegerova et al. (2006). The
rationale for this analysis is explained in the results section.
Pooled PCR amplicons of the correct length were excised from
an agarose gel with a sterile scalpel blade, purified and concen-
trated using a QIAquick Gel Extraction Kit (Qiagen, Germany).
2.4. Construction of clone libraries and sequencing
The TOPO
®
TA Cloning
®
Kit for Sequencing (Life Technologies,
USA) was used for the preparation of the ITS1 clone libraries for
each segment of equine hindgut, and the LSU clone library of the
LDC segment. Ligation of the PCR amplicons into pCR4-TOPO vector
was performed at room temperature for 30 min followed by
transformation into competent One Shot TOP10 Escherichia coli
cells (30 min on ice). Randomly selected clones of E.coli grown
overnight in lysogeny broth plates with ampicillin (50
m
g/ml) were
checked by PCR with M13 primers for the presence of the ITS1 and
LSU fragments of expected length. Plasmid DNA was then isolated
from 881 ITS1 clones and 20 LSU clones using a GenElute™HP
Plasmid Miniprep Kit (SigmaeAldrich, USA). Purified plasmid DNAs
were quantified using a NanoDrop ND-1000 UV-Vis Sectropho-
tometer (NanoDrop Technologies, USA) and Sanger sequenced
(SEQme, Czech Republic). Generated sequences were checked for
errors and any vector contamination removed. Of the clones
sequenced, 647 of the ITS1 clones and 17 of the LSU clones yielded
clear and unambiguous sequence data that were used for further
analysis.
2.5. Taxonomic and phylogenetic analysis
Taxonomic assignment of ITS1 sequences (97 % identity
threshold) was done in QIIME version 1.8 (Caporaso et al., 2010)by
BLAST against the anaerobic fungal ITS1 reference database
(Koetschan et al., 2014). The 647 cloned sequences with taxonomic
assignment from the six libraries were concatenated into a single
fasta file, and a sequence map (seqs_otus.txt) was manually built
for input into the script “make_otu_table.py”. The resulting relative
abundance table was summarized at the clade level. A similar
process was followed with the LSU sequence data, except the
similarity search was carried out using BLAST against GenBank.
Evolutionary analyses of ITS1 sequences and the LSU sequences
from the LDC sample were separately performed using the software
MEGA 6 (Tamura et al., 2013) to construct phylogenetic trees, with
1000 replicates for bootstrap analysis, using the UPGMA method.
E. Mura et al. / Fungal Biology 123 (2019) 240e246 241
LSU genes of described genera Caecomyces (JQ782555, KM878679),
Cyllamyces (DQ273829, KY386297), Piromyces (JF974096, JF974119,
JN939159), Buwchfawromyces (KP205570, NG058679), Feramyces
(MG584197, MG584228, MG605676), Neocallimastix (JF974094,
JN939158, KT274174, KR920745), Pecoramyces (JN939127,
KX961618), Orpinomyces (HQ703476, JN939163, KM878680),
Anaeromyces (JN939157, JN939170, JN939172), Liebetanzomyces
(MH468763) and Oontomyces (JX017314, JX017315) were used as
reference sequences.
The ITS1 nucleotide sequences generated from the horse hind-
gut have been deposited in the GenBank database under the
following accession numbers: MH038102 eMH038269 (caecum),
MH038399 eMH038497 (RVC), MH038498 eMH038612 (LVC),
MH038272 eMH038398 (LDC), MH038613 eMH038694 (RDC)
and MH038695 eMH038784 (rectum). The LSU sequences of the
LDC have been deposited in the GenBank database under the
accession numbers MH125212 eMH125228.
2.6. qPCR analysis
The MX 3005P QPCR System (Stratagene) and the Kapa SYBR
Fast qPCR Master mix (Kapa Biosystems) was used for the qPCR
determination of ITS1 gene copy numbers in each sample using the
ITS1 primer pair and cycling conditions as described above (see PCR
amplification). The standard curve was created (in triplicate) using
a 10-fold dilution series of a pCR4-TOPO plasmid containing the
ITS1 region of a Piromyces isolate (NCBI Accession No. KY368107).
ITS1 copy numbers were determined (in triplicate) from 1
m
l of ten-
fold diluted DNA, and data expressed per g of dry matter of digesta.
Three replicates of a negative control sample without DNA template
were also included in the qPCR assay. The qPCR assayefficiency was
101.5 %, and quantitation was linear over eight orders of magnitude
(10
1
to 10
8
gene copy
m
l
1
). The unpaired t-test (Microsoft Excel,
2010) was used to identify significant differences in the counts of
anaerobic fungi among all the samples. Significant differences were
declared when P <0.05. A quantitative profile of the anaerobic
fungi was then calculated, using the ratio between the total ITS1
gene copy number and relative abundance of each clade for each
hindgut segment.
3. Results
3.1. ITS1 based diversity analysis of anaerobic fungi in the horse
hindgut
Of the 647 successfully sequenced ITS1 clones from all six seg-
ments of the horse hindgut, the 645 clones appeared to be anaer-
obic fungal in origin and only 2 of these sequences (0.3 %) could not
be further taxonomically assigned within the class Neo-
callimastigomycetes using either the anaerobic fungal ITS1 refer-
ence database or GenBank. On average 61.7 % of all the sequences
were represented by genus-level groups that have so far only been
described in the literature based on sequence data: AL1, AL7, DT1
and KF1 (as defined by Koetschan et al., 2014). The cultured genera
Neocallimastix,Orpinomyces and Anaeromyces represented the
remaining 38.0 % sequences that could be taxonomically assigned.
Phylogenetic relationships of ITS1 sequences of uncultured anaer-
obic fungi generated from the horse hindgut and cultured genera is
shown in Fig. S1.
3.2. Distribution and quantification of anaerobic fungi along the
horse hindgut
The relative abundance of the different anaerobic fungal clades
(as defined by Koetschan et al., 2014) along the six segments of the
horse hindgut are shown (Fig. 1). The AL1 clade represented 53 % of
the total sequences and was present throughout the hindgut,
however, its relative abundance differed among gut segments. AL1
represented almost all of the anaerobic fungi in the RVC (88 %) and
LDC (97 %), and was the most abundant clade in the caecum (62 %)
and RDC (53 %). In contrast, the relative abundance of AL1 in the
LVC (4 %) and the rectum (3 %) was very low. Generally, the
decreased abundance of AL1 in certain gut segments seemed to be
associated with an increase in the abundance of the Neocallimastix
1 clade. This clade was the second most abundant (35.1 % of the
total sequences) and was detected in all segments. The third most
abundant clade was AL7 (4.3 % of the total sequences), and was also
detected in all segments. In contrast, the KF1 clade (4.2 % of the
total sequences) was only detected in the LVC (7 %), RDC (3 %) and
rectum (17 %). Sequences of the other less abundant fungi (Orpi-
nomyces 1a, Orpinomyces 1b, Anaeromyces 1 and DT1) were rela-
tively minor (13.7 % of total sequences) and detected only in some
hindgut segments.
Total anaerobic fungal concentrations differed between seg-
ments, with the exception of the caecum and LDC (Fig. 2). The RVC
followed by RDC was found to contain the highest concentrations of
anaerobic fungi, and the lowest concentrations of anaerobic fungi
were detected in the LVC and rectum. It can be clearly seen that the
lower concentrations of total anaerobic fungi in these segments is
associated with a substantial decrease in the amount of the AL1
clade, rather than an increase in the Neocallimastix 1 clade (as
indicated by Fig. 1).
3.3. LSU based diversity analysis of the LDC
As 97 % of the ITS1 sequences from the LDC segment belonged to
the monophyletic AL1 clade (Fig. 3), this segment was also analysed
using an LSU based clone library in order to better elucidate the
taxonomic position of this uncultured clade. Tree topology showed
that the LSU sequences obtained (n ¼17) formed two distinct
clusters (Fig. 4). The clones representing cluster I (n ¼8) had
highest sequence identity (94e96 %) to a sequence belonging to a
cultured Caecomyces communis (KM878679), and formed a sister
group to the Caecomyces/Cyllamyces group. The clones representing
cluster II (n ¼9) had highest sequence identity (91e92 %) to a se-
quences belonging to a cultured Liebetanzomyces sp. (MH468763)
and Anaeromyces sp. (MG605690), however, the cloned sequences
clustered distantly from the reference anaerobic fungi present in
the tree.
4. Discussion
Gut microbes are essential colonizers of the mammalian
digestive tract. They are involved in food decomposition, produc-
tion of vitamins and micronutrients. Microbial fermentative end-
products (especially acetate, propionate and butyrate) supply the
host body by energy. Microbiota of digestive tract is also involved in
a variety of other metabolic and physiological functions including
the shaping of the immune system. The importance of the equine
intestinal microbial ecosystem for animal health and performance
is well established (Dicks et al., 2014), however, research has pri-
marily focussed on only bacteria. The investigation of the anaerobic
fungi in the equine hindgut to date has been limited and, to the best
of our knowledge, there is no study of the diversity of anaerobic
fungi in the different anatomo-physiological segments of the horse
hindgut.
Our work showed that an uncultured Neocallimastigales clade
named AL1 was prevalent in the equine hindgut. This finding is
in agreement with an ITS1 based next generation sequencing
study that found the NG1 (¼AL1 in Kittelmann et al., 2012) group
E. Mura et al. / Fungal Biology 123 (2019) 240e246242
could account for 56.7%e99.9 % of the total anaerobic fungi in
the faeces of certain horses and zebra (Liggenstoffer et al., 2010).
It was surprising to observe that the AL1 clade was greatly
decreased in the LVC and rectum, with the reason for these de-
creases not clear.
The AL1 clade is not specific to equines, as it was also detected
(17.8e49.5 %) in a variety of other foregut fermenters (Liggenstoffer
et al., 2010). However, ITS1 sequences of the AL1 clade retrieved in
this study were most similar or identical only with those from the
zebra and horse (deposited in the GenBank database). The effort to
elucidate the phylogenetic relationships of the ITS1 defined AL1
clade using the LSU resulted in splitting of the sequences into two
non-related clusters. As this contrasted the monophyletic clade
seen with ITS1, further work is needed to confirm the basis of this
finding.
The second most numerous clade of uncultivated anaerobic
fungi identified in horse faeces by Liggenstoffer et al. (2010), clade
NG3 (¼AL3 in Kittelmann et al., 2012), has not been found in any
part of the horse hindgut sampled in this study. On the other hand,
sequences of the group NG7 (¼AL7 in Kittelmann et al., 2012)
retrieved by Liggenstoffer et al. (2010) in low relative abundance
only from Somali wild ass faeces (0.6 %), represented 4 % of total
clones in the present study. Sequences of another group of anaer-
obic fungi, the KF1 clade, which represented 17 % of the sequences
in the horse rectum in this study, were first detected in cow manure
and were described as an undistinguished Cyllamyces/Caecomyces
cluster of uncultured fungi (Fliegerova et al., 2010).
Regarding the known cultivable anaerobic fungi, only the clade
Neocallimastix 1 colonized the hindgut of the studied horse with a
dominant relative abundance in the LVC and rectum. However,
Fig. 1. Relative abundances of anaerobic fungal clades (as defined by Koetschan et al., 2014) in the ITS1 clone libraries constructed from six segments of the horse hindgut. The total
number of clones in each library is indicated in parentheses on the x-axis. The arrow indicates the pelvic flexure position between the LVC and LDC.
Fig. 2. Quantitative profiles of anaerobic fungal clades (as defined by Koetschan et al., 2014) in the ITS1 clone libraries constructed from six segments of the horse hindgut. The top
of the bars indicate mean concentrations (n ¼3) of total anaerobic fungal ITS1 gene copies in six different segments of horse hindgut, and different letters indicate significant
differences (P <0.05). Quantitative profiles were then generated from clade relative abundances and the ITS1 concentrations in each segment. The arrow indicates the pelvic
flexure position between the LVC and LDC.
E. Mura et al. / Fungal Biology 123 (2019) 240e246 243
quantitative profiling showed that this was due to the absence of
clade AL1, rather than an increased amount of Neocallimastix 1in
these segments. The Neocallimastix 1 sequences were mostly
similar to those obtained from ruminants, especially from cow,
bison and yak. Neocallimastix is known by its excellent hydrolytic
properties and multi-functional cellulosomal enzymes, and is
presumed to be a very effective (hemi)cellulose degrader
(Gruninger et al., 2014; Wei et al., 2016). In horse, zebra and donkey
faeces analysed by Liggenstoffer et al. (2010) this genus was either
absent or represented at very low relative abundance (<2 %).
However, in a sample from a Somali wild ass, Neocallimastix rep-
resented 45 % of all sequences.
Whilst the cause of the considerable difference in anaerobic
fungal diversity between the RVC and LVC is not clear, the differ-
ence between the neighbouring LVC and LDC may be related to the
pelvic flexure. This narrow junction is responsible for the selective
retention of coarse particles. Less digested particles are retained in
the caecum and LVC, whereas liquid and finer particles move on
into the LDC. These retropulsive-propulsive movements keep the
caecum and the whole ventral colon filled, increasing the fermen-
tation time of plant biomass. These segments of the hindgut are,
therefore, the sites with the highest digesta mean retention time of
(about 9 h) and represents the main site of lignocellulose degra-
dation (Van Weyenberg et al., 2006). As well as a longer time to
degrade the structural polysaccharides, this also provides more
time for the propagation of microorganisms.
The implication of the RVC ecosystem in forage degradation has
been highlighted already by de Fombelle et al. (2003), due to the
decreased proportion of cellulose in the digesta after passing
through the RVC. This corresponds well with our finding of highest
anaerobic fungal concentrations in the RVC compared to the other
hindgut segments. On the other hand, the segments with the
lowest anaerobic fungal concentrations (LVC and rectum) were
associated with a decrease in the amount of the AL1 clade. Varia-
tions in the concentration of anaerobic fungi found among different
gut segments in this study, however, contrasts with study of Dougal
et al. (2012) where no effect of gut segment was seen based on the
caecum, RDC and rectum sites that were sampled.
The RDC is the site of another selective mechanism (known as
the colonic separation mechanism). This mechanism is responsible
for the prolonged retention of fluid and smaller food particles
(Drogoul et al., 2000). How this mechanism may contribute to the
decrease of the AL1 clade in the rectum is not clear. Digesta samples
from this part of the hindgut, could in future studies be separated
into a liquid and a solid fraction to provide further insight, as
anaerobic fungal vegetative biomass (as opposed to the motile
zoospores) is tightly attached to plant particles.
Faeces samples are often used as reference samples to describe
the microbial population of the digestive tract, because the faecal
microbiota might be expected to contain representatives from all
regions of the large intestine. Our study provides evidence that
horse faecal samples can serve as qualitative reference samples, as
almost all clades of anaerobic fungi found in the hindgut were also
present in the faeces sample. The only exception was Anaeromyces,
which was only detected in some segments and at very low relative
abundances. However, the relative abundance and concentrations
of anaerobic fungi differed considerably along the horse hindgut
and the functional implications of this variation requires further
investigation.
Differences in anaerobic fungal concentrations along the rumi-
nant digestive tract is known to occur (Davies et al., 1993).
Furthermore, a cultivation based study by Griffith et al. (2009)
compared the anaerobic fungi in the rumen and faeces of the
same cow, and found considerable differences in the abundance of
Fig. 3. Phylogenetic relationships of ITS1 sequences of anaerobic fungi generated from the LDC inferred using the UPGMA method with bootstrap values from 1000 replications. The
evolutionary distances were computed using the Jukes-Cantor method. The analysis involved a total of 142 nucleotide sequences (127 sequences generated from the LDC in this
study and 14 of the most closely related sequences plus 1 outgroup sequence).
E. Mura et al. / Fungal Biology 123 (2019) 240e246244
the different taxa. Fungi with bulbous morphotypes (Caecomyces
and Cyllamyces) were the most abundant genera in fresh faeces,
where they comprised a 5-fold greater proportion of the total
fungal population than in the rumen. Polycentric morphotypes
(Orpinomyces and Anaeromyces) were less frequently isolated from
fresh faeces as compared to rumen digesta. Conversely, a cultiva-
tion independent study showed no difference in anaerobic fungal
community composition in the rumen, duodenum and faeces of
three different cows (Jimenez et al., 2007).
We acknowledge that no general conclusion can be made
from the analysis of samples from one horse, and the findings of
this preliminary study should be used cautiously. Nevertheless,
the data presented here provide an important next step in
revealing the considerable, as yet largely uncharacterised,
anaerobic fungal diversity in the equine hindgut. It also high-
lights the need to conduct further studies to look at the activity,
concentrations and diversity of the anaerobic fungi throughout
the digestive tract, due to evidence of differences between
hindgut segments.
Acknowledgement
This work was supported by the Ministry of Education, Youth
and Sports of the Czech Republic, grant no. CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/
15_003/0000460 OP RDE) and programs of the University of Sassari
Erasmusþ, Master and Back 2014/2015 and Visiting Professor 2016/
2017 Regione Autonoma Sardegna. JEE acknowledges funding from
an EU H2020 Marie Curie Fellowship (706899).
Appendix A. Supplementary data
Supplementary data to this article can be found online at
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.funbio.2018.12.004.
References
Caporaso, J.G., Kuczynski, J., Stombaugh, J., Bittinger,K., Bushman, F.D., Costello, E.K.,
Fierer, N., Pẽa, A.G., Goodrich, J.K., Gordon, J.I., Huttley, G.A., Kelley, S.T.,
Knights, D., Koenig, J.E., Ley, R.E., Lozupone, C.A., McDonald, D., Muegge, B.D.,
Pirrung, M., Reeder, J., Sevinsky, J.R., Turnbaugh, P.J., Walters, W.A., Widmann, J.,
Fig. 4. Phylogenetic relationships of anaerobic fungal LSU gene sequences generated from the LDC inferred using the UPGMA method with bootstrap values from 1000 replications.
The evolutionary distances were computed using the Jukes-Cantor method. The analysis involved a total of 45 nucleotide sequences (17 sequences generated from the LDC, 27
sequences of the cultured genera of anaerobic fungi plus 1 outgroup sequence).
E. Mura et al. / Fungal Biology 123 (2019) 240e246 245
Yatsunenko, T., Zaneveld, J., Knight, R., 2010. QIIME allows analysis of high-
throughput community sequencing data. Nat. Methods 7, 335e336.
de Fombelle, A., Varloud, M., Goachet, A.G., Jacotot, E., Philippeau, C., Drogoul, C.,
Julliand, V., 2003. Characterization of the microbial and biochemical profile of
the different segments of the digestive tract in horses given two distinct diets.
J. Anim. Sci. 77, 293e304.
Davies, D.R., Theodorou, M.K., Lawrence, M.I.G., Trinci, A.P.J., 1993. Distribution of
anaerobic fungi in the digestive tract of cattle and their survival in feces. J. Gen.
Microbiol. 139, 1395e1400 .
Dicks, L.M.T., Botha, M., Dicks, E., Botes, M., 2014. The equine gastro-intestinal tract:
an overview of the microbiota, disease and treatment. Livest. Sci. 160, 69e81.
Dougal, K., Harris, P.A., Edwards, A., Pachebat, J.A., Blackmore, T.M., Worgan, H.J.,
Newbold, C.J., 2012. A comparison of the microbiome and the metabolome of
different regions of the equine hindgut. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 82, 642e652.
Drogoul, C., Poncet, C., Tisserand, J.L., 2000. Feeding ground and pelleted hay rather
than chopped hay to ponies: 1. Consequences for in vivo digestibility and rate of
passage of digesta. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 87, 117e130.
Edwards, J.E., Forster, R.J., Callaghan, T.M., Dollhofer, V., Dagar, S.S., Cheng, Y.,
Chang, J., Kittelmann, S., Fliegerova, K., Puniya, A.K., Henske, J.K., Gilmore, S.P.,
O'Malley, M.A., Griffith, G.W., Smidt, H., 2017. PCR and omics based techniques
to study the diversity, ecology and biology of anaerobic fungi: insights, chal-
lenges and opportunities. Front. Microbiol. 8, 1657. https://doi.org/10.3389/
fmicb.2017.01657.
Edwards, J.E., Kingston-Smith, A.H., Jimenez, H.R., Huws, S.A., Skøt, K.P.,
Griffith, G.W., McEwan, N.R., Theodorou, M.K., 2008. Dynamics of initial colo-
nization of nonconserved perennial ryegrass by anaerobic fungi in the bovine
rumen. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 66, 537e545.
Fliegerov
a, K., Mr
azek, J., Voigt, K., 2006. Differentiation of anaerobic polycentric
fungi by rDNA PCR-RFLP. Folia Microbiol. 51, 273e277.
Fliegerova, K., Mrazek, J., Hoffmann, K., Z
abransk
a, J., Voigt, K., 2010. Diversity of
anaerobic fungi within cow manure determined by ITS1 analysis. Folia Micro-
biol. 55, 319e325.
Fliegerova, K., Mura, E., Mrazek, J., Moniello, G., 2016. A comparison of microbial
profiles of different regions of the equine hindgut. Livest. Sci. 190, 16e19.
Frape, D., 2010. Equine Nutrition and Feeding, fourth ed. Blackwell Publishing,
Australia.
Gardes, M., Bruns, T.D., 1993. ITS primers with enhanced specificity for Basidio-
mycetes eapplication to the identification of mycorrhizas and rusts. Mol. Ecol.
2, 113e118.
Griffith, G.W., Ozkose, E., Theodorou, M.K., Davies, D.R., 2009. Diversity of anaerobic
fungal populations in cattle revealed by selective enrichment culture using
different carbon sources. Fungal Ecol. 2, 87e97.
Gruninger, R.J., Anil, K., Puniya, A.K., Callaghan, T.M., Edwards, J.E., Youssef, N.,
Dagar, S.S., Fliegerova, K., Griffith, G.W., Forster, R., Tsang, A., McAllister, T.,
Elshahed, M.S., 2014. Anaerobic fungi (phylum Neocallimastigomycota): ad-
vances in understanding of their taxonomy, life cycle, ecology, role, and
biotechnological potential. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 90, 1e17.
Haitjema, C.H., Solomon, K.V., Henske, J.K., Theodorou, M.K., O'Malley, M.A., 2014.
Anaerobic gut fungi: advances in isolation, culture, and cellulolytic enzyme
discovery for biofuel production. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 111, 1471e1482.
Hanafy, R.A., Elshahed, M.S., Youssef, N.H., 2018. Feramyces austinii, gen. nov., sp.
nov., an anaerobic gut fungus from rumen and fecal samples of wild Barbary
sheep and fallow deer. Mycologia 110, 513e525. https://doi.org/10.1080/
00275514.2018.1466610.
Jimenez, H.R., Edwards, J.E., McEwan, N.R., Theodorou, M.K., 2007. Characterisation
of the population structure of anaerobic fungi in the ruminant digestive tract.
Microb. Ecol. Health Dis. 19, 40.
Joshi, A., Lanjekar, V.B., Dhakephalkar, P.K., Callaghan, T.M., Griffith, G.W., Dagar, S.S.,
2018. Liebetanzomyces polymorphus gen. et sp. nov., a new anaerobic fungus
(Neocallimastigomycota) isolated from the rumen of a goat. MycoKeys 40,
89e110. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.40.28337.
Julliand, V., Grimm, P., 2016. Horse species symposium: the microbiome of the
horse hindgut: history and current knowledge. J. Anim. Sci. 94, 2262e2274.
https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2015-0198.
Julliand, V., De Vaux, A., Villard, L., Richard, Y., 1996. Preliminary studies on the
bacterial flora of faeces taken from foals, from birth to twelve weeks. Effect of
the oral administration of a commercial colostrum replacer. Pferdeheilkunde
12, 209e212.
Koetschan, C., Kittelmann, S., Lu, J., Al-Halbouni, D., Jarvis, G.N., Müller, T., Wolf, M.,
Janssen, P.H., 2014. Internal transcribed spacer 1 secondary structure analysis
reveals a common core throughout the anaerobic fungi (Neo-
callimastigomycota). PLoS One 9, e91928. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.
0091928.
Kittelmann, S., Naylor, G.E., Koolaard, J.P., Janssen, P.H., 2012. A proposed taxonomy
of anaeobic fungi (class Neocallimastigomycetes) suitable for large-scale
sequence-based community structure analysis. PLoS One 7, e36866. https://
doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036866.
Liggenstoffer, A.S., Youseff, N.H., Couger, M.B., Elshahed, M.S., 2010. Phylogenetic
diversity and community structure of anaerobic gut fungi (phylum Neo-
callimastigomycota) in ruminant and non-ruminant herbivores. ISME J. 4,
1225e1235.
Paul, S.S., Bu, D., Xu, J., Hyde, K.D., Yu, Z., 2018. A phylogenetic census of global
diversity of gut anaerobic fungi and a new taxonomic framework. Fungal
Divers. 89, 253e266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-018-0396-6.
Tamura, K., Stecher, G., Peterson, D., Filipski, A., Kumar, S., 2013. MEGA6: molecular
evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30, 2725e2729.
Van Weyenberg, S., Sales, J., Janssens, G.P.J., 2006. Passage rate of digesta through
the equine gastrointestinal tract: a review. Livest. Sci. 99, 3e12.
Wei, Y.Q., Yang, H.J., Luan, Y., Long, R.J., Wu, Y.J., Wang, Z.Y., 2016. Isolation, iden-
tification and fibrolytic characteristics of rumen fungi grown with indigenous
methanogen from yaks (Bos grunniens) grazing on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau.
J. Appl. Microbiol. 120, 571e587.
E. Mura et al. / Fungal Biology 123 (2019) 240e246246