ArticlePDF Available

Intranasal ketamine as an analgesic agent for acute pain management in emergency department: A literature review

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Ketamine is a well-known dissociative anesthetic agent, and has been used over 50 years. Intranasal pathway is a mucosal way for absorbing agents to directly affect in brain via olfactory sheets, bypassing first pass metabolism and the blood brain barrier. The current uses of intranasal ketamine as an analgesic agent for acute pain management in emergency department are discussed in this review article. Using "ketamine", "pain or analgesia", and "intranasal" as keywords, a search of google scholar, Pubmed, web of science, and Medline database from 1970 until 2017 was performed. Finally, from 1 204 papers extracted via primary search, 1 088 papers were omitted and finally 10 studies were considered for further assessment. There were four observational studies, one case series and report and 5 clinical trials. Ketamine was used for acute pain control due to musculoskeletal trauma, burns, and painful procedures. A total of 390 cases were included in these studies. The studies used ketamine with doses ranging 0.45-1.25 mg/kg via intranasal pathway. Intranasal ketamine provides relatively rapid, well tolerated, and clinically significant analgesia for emergency department patients. Considering the lack of adequate studies and undetermined intranasal dose, it is better to conduct further high quality investigation in both adults and pediatrics.
Content may be subject to copyright.
241
doi: 10.4103/2221-6189.248028 ©2018 by the Journal of Acute Disease. All rights reserved.
Intranasal ketamine as an analgesic agent for acute pain management in
emergency department: A literature review
Abdolghader Pakniyat1, Morteza Qaribi2, Dorin Rahnama Hezaveh3, Ali Abdolrazaghnejad4
1Department of emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Kurdistan University of medical sceinces, Sanandaj, Iran
2Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak, Iran
3School of Medicine, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland
4Department of Emergency Medicine, Khatam-Al-Anbia Hospital, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran
ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT
Article history:
Received 5 October 2018
Revision 15 November 2018
Accepted 25 November 2018
Available online 21 December 2018
Keywords:
Administration
Intranasal
Emergency department
Ketamine
Pain management
Review literature
Corresponding author: Ali Abdolrazaghnejad, Department of Emergency Medicine,
Khatam-Al-Anbia Hospital, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran.
Tel: +989127141399
E-mail: ali.abdorazzagh@gmail.com
1. Introduction
Ketamine is a well-known dissociative anesthetic agent that
mediated its effects mainly via blockade of N-methyl-D-aspartate
and hyperpolarisation-activated-cyclic-nucleotide receptors[1]. For
over 50 years, it has been used in various ways[1-3]. It is likely that
it is a very useful agent for conducting procedural sedation and
analgesia in emergency department (ED)[4-6]. Despite using as an
Ketamine is a well-known dissociative anesthetic agent, and has been used over 50 years.
Intranasal pathway is a mucosal way for absorbing agents to directly affect in brain via
olfactory sheets, bypassing first pass metabolism and the blood brain barrier. The current
uses of intranasal ketamine as an analgesic agent for acute pain management in emergency
department are discussed in this review article. Using “ketamine”, “pain or analgesia”, and
“intranasal” as keywords, a search of google scholar, Pubmed, web of science, and Medline
database from 1970 until 2017 was performed. Finally, from 1 204 papers extracted via
primary search, 1 088 papers were omitted and finally 10 studies were considered for further
assessment. There were four observational studies, one case series and report and 5 clinical
trials. Ketamine was used for acute pain control due to musculoskeletal trauma, burns, and
painful procedures. A total of 390 cases were included in these studies. The studies used
ketamine with doses ranging 0.45-1.25 mg/kg via intranasal pathway. Intranasal ketamine
provides relatively rapid, well tolerated, and clinically significant analgesia for emergency
department patients. Considering the lack of adequate studies and undetermined intranasal
dose, it is better to conduct further high quality investigation in both adults and pediatrics.
J Acute Dis 2018; 7(6): 241-246
Journal of Acute Disease
journal homepage: www.jadweb.org
This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which
allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long
as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical
terms.
For reprints contact: reprints@medknow.com
©2018 Journal of Acute Disease Produced by Wolters Kluwer- Medknow
How to cite this article: Pakniyat A, Qaribi M, Hezaveh DR, Abdolrazaghnejad A.
Intranasal ketamine as an analgesic agent for acute pain management in emergency
department: A literature review. J Acute Dis 2018; 7(6): 241-246.
[Downloaded free from http://www.jadweb.org on Monday, December 24, 2018, IP: 10.232.74.22]
242 Abdolghader Pakniyat et al./ J Acute Dis 2018; 7(6): 241-246
analgesic agent in management of chronic pain, but it is not routinely
used for acute pain management of ED due to its potentially side
effects such as dissociation and emergence phenomenon[7,8].
Due to overcrowding and lack of human and facilities resources
in EDs, using a safe drug with minimal side effects is crucial.
Recent evidence proved efficacy of low dose ketamine in this
regards, although it needs further investigation[9-11]. Each drug has
some different pathway of administration. Intranasal pathway is
a mucosal way for absorbing agents to directly affect in brain via
olfactory sheets, bypassing first pass metabolism and the blood brain
barrier[12]. Accordingly, the current uses of intranasal ketamine as an
analgesic agent for acute pain management of ED are discussed in
this review article.
2. Evidence acquisition
All observational and randomized controlled trials that surveyed the
use of intranasal ketamine as an analgesic agent in the emergency
setting were eligible for assessing in this study. Using “ketamine”,
“pain or analgesia”, and “intranasal” as keywords, a search of
google scholar, Pubmed, web of science, and Medline database
from 1970 until 2016 was performed. The searching process
was performed with two independent investigators. All papers
and additional references from their citation were also included.
Initially the abstracts were screened regarding the use of intranasal
ketamine as an analgesic agent for acute pain management in both
prehospital and ED setting. No age limit was considered and both
adult and pediatric studies were included. Papers that used ketamine
through other pathway than intranasal published in non-English
languages, animal studies, and review articles were excluded. Non-
available full text, duplicated studies, and unpublished ones were
eliminated. Evaluation was performed independently by 4 reviewers
and validated scales were using pain measurement tools and also
mentioning side effects were in the studies. The results were
summarized and presents in Tables.
3. Results
Finally, from 1 204 papers extracted via primary search, 1 088
papers were omitted and finally 10 studies were considered for
further assessment. There were four observational studies, one case
series and report and 5 clinical trials including 4 randomized, 1 non-
randomized, 4 blinded, and 1 non-blinded one (Figure 1). Ketamine
was used for acute pain control due to musculoskeletal trauma,
burns, and painful procedures. A total of 631 cases were included in
these studies. The studies used ketamine with doses ranging 0.45 -
1.25 mg/kg via intranasal pathway.
Table 1 shows the characteristics and summery of the clinical
trial studies included in the current review. Clinical trial studies
showed acceptable analgesia with ketamine with no differences
compared with other analgesic agents[13-15]. Table 2 shows the
characteristics and summery of the non-clinical trial studies included
in the current review. The observational studies and case reports
concluded analgesic effect of ketamine without major side effects[19-
22]. Summary of reported side effects in the studies included in the
current review were reported in Table 3. All side effects were minor
and transient.
Figure 1. Fowchart of search strategy and paper extraction in current review.
[Downloaded free from http://www.jadweb.org on Monday, December 24, 2018, IP: 10.232.74.22]
243
Abdolghader Pakniyat et al./ J Acute Dis 2018; 7(6): 241-246
Table 1
Characteristics and summery of clinical trial studies in current review.
Ref Design Participants Analgesia agents Outcome Result Conclusion
Graudins et al[14] Randomized,
controlled, double-
blind trial
A total of 80 children
aged 3 to 13 years
and weighing less
than 50 kg, with
isolated limb injury
and pain of more than
6/10.
IN ketamine (1 mg/
kg) or fentanyl (1.5
microgram/kg).
coadministered oral
ibuprofen at 10 mg/
kg
Median pain
reduction at 30
min; pain reduction
at 15 and 60
min, subjective
improvement
and satisfaction,
University of
Michigan Sedation
Score, adverse events,
and rescue analgesia.
Pain reductions of
ketamine vs fentanyl; 45
vs. 40 mm, respectively
(95% CI 10 to 20 mm).
IN fentanyl and
ketamine had similar
analgesic effect in
children with limb
injury. Ketamine had
more minor adverse
events.
Nejati et al[15] Prospective double-
blind randomized
clinical trial
72 stable subjects
aged >18 years
who required NG
tube placement
for diagnostic or
therapeutic purposes
in the ED
Local ketamine
plus water-soluble
lubricating gel
and water-soluble
lubricating gel alone
VAS fallowing of NG
tube placement was
measured; evaluate
the difficulty of the
procedure using a
5-point Likert scale.
VAS of the ketamine vs.
control groups (19.03±
3.56 vs. 33.33±5.31),
not statistically
different between the
two groups (2.39±1.25
vs. 2.78±1.56).
IN ketamine is an
effective agent in
reducing pain during
NG tube insertion
among patients without
serious underlying
illness.
Nielsen et al[16] Prospective
nonrandomized open-
label clinical trial
50 child ≥10 kg
candidate for a
painful procedure
Formulation of IN
sufentanil 0.5 mcg/
kg- ketamine 0.5 mg/
kg
Pain intensity
before and during
the procedure was
measured using age-
appropriate pain
scales.
Procedural pain
intensity scores ≤5
(0-10) in 78% of the
painful procedures.
Sufentanil/ketamine
nasal spray provided
rapid onset of analgesia
for a variety of painful
procedures.
Reynolds et al[17] Randomized
controlled,
87 child (4-17
years old) suspected
isolated fractures
1 mg/kg IN ketamine
vs. 1.5 μg/kg IN
fentanyl
Frequency of
cumulative side
effects and adverse
events within
60 min of drug
administration and
difference in mean
pain score reduction
at 20 min.
Cumulative number
of side effects was 2.2
times higher in the
ketamine group, but
there were no serious
adverse events.
IN ketamine was
associated with more
minor side effects than
IN fentanyl. Pain relief
at 20 min was similar
between groups.
Parvizrad et al[18] Balanced block
randomized
controlled
154 adult patients
with isolated
orthopedic trauma
and VAS ≥60 mm
Ketamine-IN (0.4
mg/kg IN ketamine
and an equal volume
of placebo saline IV
and ketamine-IV (0.2
mg/kg ketamine IV
with 0.5 mL saline
IN)
Patients were
assessed for VAS
measurement and
adverse events At 5,
10, 20, and 30 min.
No difference between
two groups in case of
score change of VAS
and Adverse events in
both groups were mild
and transient.
IN ketamine is may
be used in cases
where there is no need
for venipuncture of
peripheral vessels,
especially in crowded
EDs.
VAS: visual analog scale; IN: Intranasal; IV: intravenously.
[Downloaded free from http://www.jadweb.org on Monday, December 24, 2018, IP: 10.232.74.22]
244 Abdolghader Pakniyat et al./ J Acute Dis 2018; 7(6): 241-246
Table 2
Characteristics and summery of non-clinical trial studies in current review.
Ref design Participants Analgesia agents Outcome Result Conclusion
Andolfatto et al[19] Prospective
observational study
40 patients aged >6
years old ( mean
age 47 years) with
primarily orthopedic
injury
0.5 to 0.75 mg/kg
intranasal ketamine
Clinical significant
VAS reduction ( 13
mm) within 30 min,
mean reduction of
VAS, median time
require to achieve at
least 13 mm reduction
of VAS, vital sign
change, side effects.
Median changes in
VAS at 30 min: 34
mm (44%).
Reduced VAS pain
scores to a clinically
significant degree in
88% of ED patients
without major side
effects.
Yeaman et al[20] Prospective,
observational study
72 patients (median
aged 34.5 years) with
severe pain; VAS ≥6.
Ketamine 0.7 mg/
kg intranasal (first
6 mo); 1.0 mg/kg
intranasal (second 6
mo) followed by a
0.5 mg/kg intranasal
(15th min) if no pain
reduction
Change in VAS at 30
min; patients with
clinically significant
VAS reduction in
VAS (≥20 mm) at 30
min; significant pain
reduction dose of
ketamine.
Median reduction
VAS at 30 min was
24 mm (IQR: 2-45).
Significant VAS
reduction ≥20 mm in
40 cases (56%, 95%
CI: 44.0-66.7). Total
median ketamine
dose was 0.94 mg/kg
(IQR: 0.72-1.04).
Intranasal ketamine
of 1 mg/kg, was an
effective analgesic
agent in 56% of
study patients. Needs
further investigation
in adults.
Yeaman et al[21] Observational study 28 patients aged 3-13
years, with moderate
to severe (≥ 6/10) pain
from isolated limb
injury
Ketamine intranasal Change in median
VAS at 30 min.
change in median
pain rating at 60
min, patient/parent
satisfaction, need for
additional analgesia
and side effects.
Median VAS
decreased from
74.5 mm (IQR 60-85)
to 30 mm (IQR 12-
51.5) at 30 min.
An average dose of
1.0 mg/kg intranasal
ketamine result in
adequate analgesia by
30 min.
Shrestha et al[22] Cross sectional,
observational study
39 patients aged > 8
years old with various
acute injuries and
VAS pain score >50
mm
Ketamine 0.7 mg/
kg intranasal with
an additional dose at
15th minutes (0.3 mg/
kg) if VAS >50 mm
Number of patients
achieving ≥ 20 mm
reductions in VAS
at 15 min; median
reduction in VAS
at 15, 30 and 60
min, changes of
vital signs, adverse
events, satisfaction of
patients, and need for
additional ketamine.
VAS reduction from
baseline to 40 mm
(IQR 20–40), 20 mm
(IQR 14–20) and 20
mm (IQR 10–20)
respectively at 15, 30
and 60 min.
Intranasal ketamine
is an analgesic choice
for patients with acute
injury in moderate
to severe pain in an
overcrowded and
resource limited ED.
Johansson et al[23] Case series 9 patients with
trauma in outdoor
winter-conditions
S-Ketamine 0.45-
1.25 mg/kg.
---- Initially median pain-
score from median
10 (interquartile
range 8–10) and
finally median pain-
score after was 3
(interquartile range
2–4).
Nasal administration
of S-ketamine is off
label and as such
we only use it as a
last resource and
propose that the
effect and safety of
the treatment should
be further studied.
VAS: visual analog scale.
[Downloaded free from http://www.jadweb.org on Monday, December 24, 2018, IP: 10.232.74.22]
245
Abdolghader Pakniyat et al./ J Acute Dis 2018; 7(6): 241-246
4. Discussion
Based on the findings of current review, there are acceptable
analgesic effects for intranasal ketamine. However, since all studies
were included without consideration age, clinical situation and
dosage, it would not be possible to determine definite evidence
regarding use of intranasal ketamine as an analgesic agent for acute
pain management of ED.
Bioavailability of ketamine through intranasal pathway is 45%-
55%[13]. It was reported that intranasal ketamine is detectable in
blood 2 min after administration and its maximum concentration
would be at 30 min later, and provides sufficient analgesia up to
1 h[24]. When used in combination with other drugs, low dose
intranasal ketamine could result in reducing the dose of the other
agents. It is particularly useful in opium-addicted patients[14,20,21,25].
Co-administration of other analgesic agents such as in the study of
Graudins et al that patients received ibuprofen, it may be affected on
study results[14].
All studies were conducted on traumatic patients, and supported
intranasal ketamine sufficient analgesic effect 30 min later, although
available data regarding its use in adult is still limited[14-22,16,23].
Clinical trials showed no difference between the studied groups
regarding pain control. Reported side effects were minor and
transient and did not need any intervention[14-16].
Ketamine was used for painful procedural sedation. Nejati et
al showed that intranasal ketamine facilitated nasogastric tube
insertion, without increasing the rate of vomiting[15]. In the study of
Neilsen et al, sufentanil/ketamine nasal spray provided rapid onset of
analgesia for a variety of painful procedures, so intranasal ketamine
is an acceptable choice for suturing, intravenous line insertion and
etc[16].
There were some differences among studies regarding how the
drug was administered into nostril, dripping with a syringe or using
a spray device. Better absorption occurs while the agent is sprayed
into nasal cavity that provided wider mucosal surface area for
absorption[19,22].
Nasal ketamine may be used in cases where there is no need for
venipuncture of peripheral vessels, especially in crowded EDs and in
prehospital situation, where venipuncture is difficult[18,26].
The authors believe that intranasal ketamine is safe and does not
need close monitoring, but in cases with severe pain in crowded
ED it may be not suitable or possible to wait 30 min to achieve
sufficient analgesic effect. Use of ketamine in combination with low
dose of other analgesic agents would be a better decision. Intranasal
pathway is a rapid and needleless approach that decline the risk
of transmission of blood-borne infections in a stressful situation
of out of hospital such as bad weather condition and dangerous
environment, as well in cases that have not an intravenous access or
does not need to insert intravenous line like an isolated orthopedic
trauma, intranasal rout would be preferable.
5. Conclusion
Intranasal ketamine provides relatively rapid, well tolerated, and
clinically significant analgesia for ED patients. Considering the lack
of adequate studies and undetermined intranasal dose, it is better
to conduct further high quality investigation in both adults and
pediatrics.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors report no conflict of interest.
References
[1] Sleigh J, Harvey M, Voss L, Denny B. Ketamine–More mechanisms of
action than just NMDA blockade. Trends Anaesth &Crit Care 2014; 4(2):
76-81.
[2] Persson J. Wherefore ketamine? Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2010; 23(4): 455-
460.
[3] Hirota K, Lambert D. Ketamine: New uses for an old drug? Br J Anaesth
2011; 107(2):123-126.
[4] Reves J, Glass P, Lubarsky D, McEvoy M, Ruiz R. Intravenous
anaesthetics. In: Miller R, editor. Millers anaesthesia. 7th ed. USA:
Churchill Livingstone; 2010, p. 719-771.
[5] Stoelting R, Hillier S. Nonbarbiturate intravenous anaesthetic drugs. In:
Stoelting R, Hillier S, editors. Pharmacology and physiology in anaesthetic
practice. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkin; 2006, p.
155–178.
Table 3
Summery of reported side effects in studies of current review.
Ref Side effects
Graudins et al[14] Adverse events, mainly mild, were reported for ketamine by 78% of patients.
Nielsen et al[16] The reported adverse effects were mild and mostly related to an unpleasant bitter taste (15/50) immediately after administration of the
nasal spray; Three events of vomiting occurred
Andolfatto[19] All adverse effects were transient and did not require treatment; There were no changes in vital signs requiring clinical intervention.
Yeaman et al[20] Seventy-nine per cent of subjects (57/72) reported 96 adverse effects, the most common being dizziness (31.9%).
Yeaman et al[21] A total of 28 reported adverse events were all transient and mild.
Shrestha et al[22] Adverse events were generally mild and transient in nature, resolving mostly within 60 minutes after administration of ketamine
[Downloaded free from http://www.jadweb.org on Monday, December 24, 2018, IP: 10.232.74.22]
246 Abdolghader Pakniyat et al./ J Acute Dis 2018; 7(6): 241-246
[6] Gyanesh P, Haldar R, Srivastava D, Agrawal P, Tiwari A, Singh P.
Comparison between intranasal dexmedetomidine and intranasal ketamine
as premedication for procedural sedation in children undergoing MRI: a
double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. J Anesth 2014; 28(1):
12-18.
[7] Green S, Roback M, Kennedy R, Krauss B. Clinical practice guideline for
emergency department ketamine dissociative sedation: 2011 update. Ann
Emerg Med 2011; 57(5): 449-461.
[8] Chizh B, Headley P. NMDA antagonists and neuropathic pain--multiple
drug targets and multiple uses. Curr Pharm Design 2005; 11(23): 2977-
2994.
[9] Galinski M, Dolveck F, Combes X, Limoges V, Smaïl N, Pommier V, et
al. Management of severe acute pain in emergency settings: Ketamine
reduces morphine consumption. Am J Emerg Med 2007; 25(4): 385-390.
[10] Kennedy R, Porter F, Miller J, Jaffe D. Comparison of fentanyl/
midazolam with ketamine/midazolam for pediatric orthopedic
emergencies. Pediatrics 1998; 102(4 Pt 1): 956-963.
[11] Gurnani A, Sharma P, Rautela R, Bhattacharya A. Analgesia for acute
musculoskeletal trauma: Low-dose subcutaneous infusion of ketamine.
Anaesth & Intensive Care 1996; 24(1): 32-36.
[12] Westin U, Boström E, Gråsjö J, Hammarlund-Udenaes M, Björk E.
Direct nose-to-brain transfer of morphine after nasal administration to
rats. Pharm Res 2006; 23(3): 565-572.
[13] Ducharme J. Analgesia, anesthesia, and procedural sedation. In: Tintinalli
JE, editor. Tintinallis emergency medicine a comprehensive study guide.
8th ed: McGraw-Hill Medical; 2016.
[14] Graudins A, Meek R, Egerton-Warburton D, Oakley E, Seith R. The
PICHFORK (Pain in Children Fentanyl or Ketamine) trial: a randomized
controlled trial comparing intranasal ketamine and fentanyl for the relief
of moderate to severe pain in children with limb injuries. Ann Emerg Med
2015; 65(3): 248-254.
[15] Nejati A, Golshani K, Moradi LM, Khashayar P, Moharari R. Ketamine
improves nasogastric tube insertion. Emerg Med J 2010; 27(8): 582-585.
[16] Nielsen B, Friis S, Rømsing J, Schmiegelow K, Anderson B, Ferreirós
N, et al. Intranasal sufentanil/ketamine analgesia in children. Paediatr
Anaesth 2014; 24(2): 170-180.
[17] Reynolds SL, Bryant KK, Studnek JR, Hogg M, Dunn C, Templin MA,
et al. Randomized controlled feasibility trial of intranasal ketamine
compared to intranasal fentanyl for analgesia in children with suspected
extremity fractures. Acad Emerg Med 2017; 24(12): 1430-1440.
[18] Parvizrad R, Pakniyat A, Malekianzadeh B, Almasi-Hashiani A.
Comparing the analgesic effect of intranasal with intravenous ketamine
in isolated orthopedic trauma: A randomized clinical trial. Turkish J
Emerg Med 2017; 17(3): 99-103.
[19] Andolfatto G, Willman E, Joo D, Miller P, Wong W, Koehn M, et al.
Intranasal ketamine for analgesia in the emergency department: A
prospective observational series. Acad Emerg Med 2013; 20(10): 1050-
1054.
[20] Yeaman F, Meek R, Egerton-Warburton D, Rosengarten P, Graudins A.
Sub-dissociative-dose intranasal ketamine for moderate to severe pain in
adult emergency department patients. Emerg Med Australas 2014; 26(3):
237-242.
[21] Yeaman F, Oakley E, Meek R, Graudins A. Sub-dissociative dose
intranasal ketamine for limb injury pain in children in the emergency
department: A pilot study. Emerg Med Australas 2013; 25(2): 161-167.
[22] Shrestha R, Pant S, Shrestha A, Batajoo K, Thapa R, Vaidya S. Intranasal
ketamine for the treatment of patients with acute pain in the emergency
department. World J Emerg Med 2016; 7(1): 19-24.
[23] Johansson J, Sjöberg J, Nordgren M, Sandström E, Sjöberg F, Zetterström
H. Prehospital analgesia using nasal administration of S-ketamine--A
case series. Scand J Trauma, Resusc & Emerg Med 2012; 21: 38.
[24] Carr D, Goudas L, Denman W, Brookoff D, Staats P, Brennen L, et
al. Safety and efficacy of intranasal ketamine for the treatment of
breakthrough pain in patients with chronic pain: A randomized, double-
blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study. Pain 2004; 108(1-2): 17-27.
[25] Shikanai H, Hiraide S, Kamiyama H, Kiya T, Oda K, Goto Y, et al.
Subanalgesic ketamine enhances morphine-induced antinociceptive
activity without cortical dysfunction in rats. J Anesthes 2014; 28(3): 390-
398.
[26] Bahrampouri S, Pakniyat A, Qaribi M, Habibzadeh Y. Intranasal agents
in the emergency care: A systematic review. Iran J Syst Rev Med Sci 2017;
1(1): 36-47.
[Downloaded free from http://www.jadweb.org on Monday, December 24, 2018, IP: 10.232.74.22]
... The second goal is to prevent long-term side effects by eliminating a variety of risk factors to increase life expectancy, so effective treatment of these patients using new and approved therapeutic drugs, is very important in reducing costs. Therefore, this study was conducted to evaluate drug therapy in non-communicable diseases in the form of a review study and the most widely used drugs that are potentially used to treat non-communicable diseases are briefly reviewed [18][19][20]. Increasing cases of noncommunicable diseases around the world have made the disease a public health priority in the poorest countries, according to Wifrom. Many chronic diseases, such as cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, chronic respiratory diseases, including asthma, and some cancers, can be controlled with medication and can prolong life through strong primary health systems. ...
Article
Full-text available
This study is a conceptual review. Various protocols have been proposed for non-communicable diseases worldwide. The importance of this large group of diseases has prompted the World Health Organization (WHO) to plan effectively to set targets to reduce mortality from these diseases by one-third by 2030 in the Sustainable Development Plan. In asthma, corticosteroids are still recognized as the most potent anti-asthma drugs, and there is still no drug with the same effect, and biological agents (drugs such as amalizumab) significantly improve the management of severe asthma. Regarding diabetes, the recommendations of the WHO were reviewed, and the first recommendation is that if metformin, which is recommended as the first oral antidiabetic drug in all guidelines, cannot control hyperglycemia, sulfonylurea should be prescribed to patients with type 2 diabetes. Non-communicable diseases in Iran cause 45% of the disease burden in men and 33% of the disease burden in women, of the total causes of the disease burden in both sexes (6-10). Obesity and overweight, arterial hypertension, inadequate physical activity and addiction are 86% of the risk factors for diseases and 11% of all diseases. These risk factors have caused 6.1 million years of adapted life expectancy in Iran.
Article
Objectives: To review current evidence regarding the off-label use of intranasal ketamine for acute pain presenting in the setting of the emergency department, and secondary to pediatric limb injuries, renal colic, digital nerve block, and migraines. Results: In all five indications reviewed, ketamine demonstrated efficacy in reducing pain. However, when compared to other agents, ketamine did not demonstrate superiority over opioids in pediatric limb injuries or renal colic and was not as efficacious as standard therapy for migraine relief. Ketamine was also associated with a greater incidence of transient adverse reactions, such as dizziness, bitter aftertaste, fatigue, and vomiting than opioid therapies. Discussion: The current body of evidence is insufficient to support the use of intranasal ketamine over other standard therapies for acute pain. However, current evidence can be used when developing dosing strategies, preparing for adverse reactions, and generating hypotheses for future, more robust research.
Article
Full-text available
Objectives Ketamine is commonly used in anesthetic and sedation before surgical procedures and acts as an analgesic in smaller doses. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of intranasal (IN) ketamine in patients with moderate to severe limb trauma (visual analog scale (VAS) > 60 mm). Methods In a triple-blind randomized controlled clinical trial; 154 patients with isolated orthopedic trauma and visual analog scale (VAS) ≥60 mm were included on the basis of inclusion and exclusion criteria. Patients were divided into two groups of ketamine-IN (0.4 mg/kg IN ketamine and an equal volume of placebo saline intravenously (IV)) and ketamine-IV (0.2 mg/kg ketamine IV with 0.5 ml saline IN) on the basis of balanced block randomization method. At 5, 10, 20, and 30 min, patients were assessed for VAS measurement and adverse events. Repeated measure ANOVA, independent t-test and chi square test were employed. The level of statistical significance was considered to be less than 0.05. Results Mean VAS in IN ketamine and IV group at minute 30 was 31.50 ± 13.40 and 29.35 ± 11.73, respectively. At minute 30, 31 patients (20.39%) required a low-dose of morphine as rescue analgesia (P = 0.427). The results showed that mean change score of VAS (difference of time 0 and time 30) in IN ketamine and IV ketamine VAS were 43.8 (95% confidence interval: 41.1–46.5) and 46.4 (95% confidence interval: 42.8–50.1) and there is no difference between two groups in case of score change of VAS (P = 0.245). Adverse events in nasal and intravenous ketamine in both groups were mild and transient. Conclusion IN ketamine is associated with few side effects and appropriate analgesic effects in isolated orthopedic trauma patients, and it may be used in cases where there is no need for venipuncture of peripheral vessels, especially in crowded EDs.
Article
Full-text available
BACKGROUND: Pain in the emergency department (ED) is common but undertreated. The objective of this study was to examine the efficacy and safety of intranasal (IN) ketamine used as an analgesic for patients with acute injury with moderate to severe pain. METHODS: This study was a cross sectional, observational study of patients more than 8 years old experiencing moderate to severe pain [visual analog score (VAS) >50 mm]. The initial dose of IN ketamine was 0.7 mg/kg with an additional dose of 0.3 mg/kg if VAS was more than 50 mm after 15 minutes. Pain scores and vital signs were recorded at 0, 15, 30 and 60 minutes. Side-effects, sedation level and patient's satisfaction were also recorded. The primary outcome was the number of patients achieving ≥ 20 mm reductions in VAS at 15 minutes. Other secondary outcome measures were median reduction in VAS at 15, 30 and 60 minutes, changes of vital signs, adverse events, satisfaction of patients, and need for additional ketamine. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients with a median age of 29.5 years (IQR 17.5–38) were enrolled, and they had an initial median VAS of 80 mm (IQR 67–90). The VAS decreased more than 20 mm at 15 minutes in 27 (80%) patients. The reduction of VAS from baseline to 40 mm (IQR 20–40), 20 mm (IQR 14–20) and 20 mm (IQR 10–20) respectively at 15, 30 and 60 minutes (P<0.001). No critical changes of vital signs were noted and adverse effects were mild and transient. CONCLUSION: This study showed that IN ketamine is an analgesic choice for patients with acute injury in moderate to severe pain in an overcrowded and resource limited ED
Article
Full-text available
Background There are currently no studies assessing effectiveness of sub-dissociative intranasal (IN) ketamine as the initial analgesic for adult patients in the ED.Objective The study aims to examine the effectiveness of sub-dissociative IN ketamine as a primary analgesic agent for adult patients in the ED.Method This is a prospective, observational study of adult ED patients presenting with severe pain (≥6 on 11-point scale at triage). IN ketamine dose was 0.7 mg/kg, with secondary dose of 0.5 mg/kg at 15 min if pain did not improve. After 6 months, initial dose was increased to 1.0 mg/kg with the same optional secondary dose.Primary outcomesThe primary outcomes are change in VAS rating at 30 min; percentage of patients reporting clinically significant reduction in VAS (≥20 mm) at 30 min; dose resulting in clinically significant pain reduction.ResultsOf the 72 patients available for analysis, median age was 34.5 years and 64% were men. Median initial VAS rating was 76 mm (interquartile range [IQR]: 65–82). Median total dose of IN ketamine for all patients was 0.98 mg/kg (IQR: 0.75–1.15, range: 0.59–1.57). Median reduction in VAS rating at 30 min was 24 mm (IQR: 2–45). Forty (56%, 95% CI: 44.0–66.7) reported VAS reduction ≥20 mm, these patients having had a total median ketamine dose of 0.94 mg/kg (IQR: 0.72–1.04).ConclusionIN ketamine, at a dose of about 1 mg/kg, was an effective analgesic agent in 56% of study patients. The place of IN ketamine in analgesic guidelines for adults requires further investigation.
Article
Full-text available
Ketamine has been in clinical use for over half a century, yet its precise mechanisms of action remain mysterious for the large part. Its hypnotic effects appear to be largely mediated by blockade of NMDA and HCN1 receptors, but cholinergic, aminergic, and opioid systems appear to play both a positive and negative modulatory role in both sedation and analgesia. Ketamine’s effects in chronic pain, and as an antidepressant, far outlast the actual drug levels, and are probably mediated by a secondary increase in structural synaptic connectivity that is mediated by a neuronal response to the ketamine-induced hyper-glutamatergic state.
Article
Objective: We compared the tolerability and efficacy of intranasal sub-dissociative ketamine to intranasal fentanyl for analgesia of children with acute traumatic pain and investigated the feasibility of a larger non-inferiority trial that could investigate the potential opioid sparing effects of intranasal ketamine. Methods: This randomized controlled trial compared intranasal ketamine 1 mg/kg to intranasal fentanyl 1.5 μg/kg in children 4-17 years old with acute pain from suspected, isolated extremity fractures presenting to an urban level II pediatric trauma center from December 2015 to November 2016. Patients, parents, treating physicians, and outcome assessors were blinded to group allocation. The primary outcome, a tolerability measure, was the frequency of cumulative side effects and adverse events within 60 minutes of drug administration. The secondary outcomes included the difference in mean pain score reduction at 20 minutes, the proportion of patients achieving a clinically significant reduction in pain in 20 minutes, total dose of opioid pain medication in morphine equivalents/kg/hour (excluding study drug) required during the emergency department (ED) stay, and the feasibility of enrolling children presenting to the ED in acute pain into a randomized trial conducted under US regulations. All patients were monitored until 6 hours after their last dose of study drug, or until admission to the hospital ward or operating room. Results: Of 629 patients screened, 87 received the study drug and 82 had complete data for the primary outcome (41 patients in each group). The median age (interquartile range) was 8 (3) years and 62% were male. Baseline pain scores were similar among patients randomized to receive ketamine (73 ± 26) and fentanyl (69 ± 26) [mean difference (95% CI): 4 (-7 to 15)]. The cumulative number of side effects was 2.2 times higher in the ketamine group, but there were no serious adverse events and no patients in either group required intervention. The most common side effects of ketamine were bad taste in the mouth (37; 90.2%), dizziness (30; 73.2%), and sleepiness (19; 46.3%). The most common side effects of fentanyl were sleepiness (15; 36.6%), bad taste in the mouth (9; 22%), and itchy nose (9; 22%). No patients experienced respiratory side effects. At 20 minutes, the mean pain scale score reduction was 44 ± 36 for ketamine and 35 ± 29 for fentanyl [mean difference: 9 (95% CI: -4 to 23)]. Procedural sedation with ketamine occurred in 28 ketamine patients (65%) and 25 fentanyl patients (57%) prior to completing the study. Conclusions: Intranasal ketamine was associated with more minor side effects than intranasal fentanyl. Pain relief at 20 minutes was similar between groups. Our data support the feasibility of a larger, non-inferiority trial to more rigorously evaluate the safety, efficacy, and potential opioid sparing benefits of intranasal ketamine analgesia for children with acute pain. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Article
The objective was to examine the feasibility, effectiveness, and adverse effect profile of intranasal ketamine for analgesia in emergency department (ED) patients. This was a prospective observational study examining a convenience sample of patients aged older than 6 years experiencing moderate or severe pain, defined as a visual analog scale (VAS) score of 50 mm or greater. Patients received 0.5 to 0.75 mg/kg intranasal ketamine. Pain scores were recorded on a standard 100-mm VAS by trained investigators at baseline, then every 5 minutes for 30 minutes, and then every 10 minutes for an additional 30 minutes. The primary outcome was the number and proportion of patients experiencing clinically significant reductions in VAS pain scores, defined as VAS reductions of 13 mm or more, within 30 minutes. Secondary outcomes included the median reduction in VAS, the median time required to achieve a 13 mm reduction in VAS, vital sign changes, and adverse events. Continuous data are reported with medians and interquartile ranges (IQRs). The Wilcoxon signed-ranks test was used to assess changes in VAS scores. Adverse effects are reported with proportions and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Forty patients were enrolled with a median age of 47 years (IQR = 36 to 57 years; range = 11 to 79 years) for primarily orthopedic injuries. A reduction in VAS of 13 mm or more within 30 minutes was achieved in 35 patients (88%). The median change in VAS at 30 minutes was 34 mm (44%). Median time required to achieve a 13 mm VAS reduction was 9.5 minutes (IQR = 5 to 13 minutes; range = 5 to 25 minutes). No serious adverse effects occurred. Minor adverse effects included dizziness (21 patients, 53%; 95% CI = 38% to 67%), feeling of unreality (14 patients, 35%; 95% CI = 22% to 50%), nausea (four patients, 10%; 95% CI = 4% to 23%), mood change (three patients, 8%; 95% CI = 3% to 20%), and changes in hearing (one patient, 3%; 95% CI = 0% to 13%). All adverse effects were transient and none required intervention. There were no changes in vital signs requiring clinical intervention. Intranasal ketamine reduced VAS pain scores to a clinically significant degree in 88% of ED patients in this series. Adverse effects were minor and transient. Intranasal ketamine may have a role in the provision of effective, expeditious analgesia to ED patients.
Article
The management of procedural pain in children ranges from physical restraint to pharmacological interventions. Pediatric formulations that permit accurate dosing, are accepted by children and a have a rapid onset of analgesia are lacking. To investigate a pediatric formulation of intranasal sufentanil 0.5 mcg·kg(-1) and ketamine 0.5 mg·kg(-1) for procedural pain and to characterize the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile. Fifty children (≥10 kg) scheduled for a painful procedure were included in this prospective nonrandomized open-label clinical trial. Thirteen of these children had central venous access for drug assay sampling; enabling a compartmental PK analysis using nonlinear mixed-effects models. Pain intensity before and during the procedure was measured using age-appropriate pain scales. Heart rate, oxygen saturation and sedation were recorded. Children had a mean age of 8.8 (sd 4.9) years and weight 35.2 (sd 20.1) kg. Sufentanil/ketamine nasal spray was effective (procedural pain intensity scores ≤5 (0-10)) in 78% of the painful procedures. The spray was well accepted by 94% of the children. Oxygen saturation and heart rate remained stable, and sedation was minimal. The bioavailability of sufentanil and ketamine was 24.6% and 35.8%, respectively. Maximum plasma concentration (Cmax ) of sufentanil was 0.042 mg·l(-1) (coefficient of variation (CV) 12.9%) at 13.8 min (CV 12.4%) (Tmax ). Cmax for ketamine was 0.102 mg·l(-1) (CV 10.8%), and Tmax was 8.5 min (CV 17.3%). Sufentanil/ketamine nasal spray provided rapid onset of analgesia for a variety of painful procedures with few adverse effects and has promising features for use in pediatric procedural pain management.
Article
Ketamine, a noncompetitive N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist, has been used for the treatment of cancer pain as an analgesic adjuvant to opioids. However, ketamine is known to produce psychotomimetic side effects including cognitive impairments under a high-dose situation, presumably as the result of cortical dysfunction. Here, we investigated whether low-dose ketamine was useful as an analgesic adjuvant to morphine for pain control, focusing on frontocortical function. To assess the analgesic effects of ketamine with or without morphine, we performed behavioral and histochemical experiments, using the hot plate test and c-Fos expression analysis in rats. The effect on cortical function was also determined by prepulse inhibition (PPI) of the acoustic startle and evoked potentials in the hippocampal CA1-medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) synapses as measures of synaptic efficacy. Coadministration of ketamine as a subanalgesic dose significantly enhanced intraperitoneal morphine-induced antinociceptive response, which was measured as the increased reaction latency in the hot plate test. In addition, the noxious thermal stimulus-induced c-Fos expression in the ventrolateral periaqueductal gray matter was significantly suppressed by concomitant ketamine and morphine. In contrast, the subanalgesic dose of ketamine did not impair PPI and synaptic efficacy in the mPFC. The present results indicate that the morphine-induced analgesic effect is enhanced by a concomitant subanalgesic dose of ketamine without affecting cortical function. Our findings possibly support the clinical notion that low-dose ketamine as an analgesic adjuvant has therapeutic potential to reduce opioid dosage, thereby improving the quality of life in cancer pain patients.
Article
Providing anesthesia to children undergoing MRI is challenging. Adequate premedication, administered noninvasively, would make the process smoother. In this study, we compare the efficacy of intranasal dexmedetomidine (DXM) with the intranasal administration of ketamine for procedural sedation in children undergoing MRI. We studied 150 children, between 1 and 10 years of age, divided randomly into three groups (DXM, K, and S). For blinding, every child received the intranasal drugs twice; syringe S1, 60 min before, and syringe S2, 30 min before intravenous (IV) cannulation. For children in group DXM, S1 contained DXM (1 μg/kg) and S2 was plain saline. Children in group K received saline in S1 and ketamine (5 mg/kg) in S2 whereas children in group S received saline in both S1 and S2. The child's response to drug administration, ease of IV cannulation, the satisfaction of the anesthesiologist and child's parents with the premedication, and the total propofol dose required for the satisfactory conduct of the procedure were compared. We also compared the time to awakening and discharge of the child as well as the occurrence of any side effects with these drugs. Both DXM and ketamine were equally effective as premedication in these patients. Most of the children accepted the intranasal drugs with minimal discomfort; 90.4 % of the anesthesiologists in the DXM group and 82.7 % in the ketamine group were satisfied with the conditions for IV cannulation whereas only 21.3 % were satisfied in the saline group. The total dose of propofol used was less in the study groups. Furthermore, children in group DXM and group K had earlier awakening and discharge than those in group S. DXM and ketamine were equally effective, by the intranasal route, as premedication in children undergoing MRI.