Content uploaded by Roham Afghani Khoraskani
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Roham Afghani Khoraskani on Dec 23, 2018
Content may be subject to copyright.
Author(s):
Pooyan Kazemi
Shahid Beheshti University
Roham Afghani Khoraskani
Shahid Beheshti University
Mohammad Tahsildoost
Shahid Beheshti University
“The architectural form directly aects a building’s structural behavior, inadequate considerations of the schematic
design process can reduce structural eciency. A good understanding of the structural behavior of tall building
could help the design team in the initial design phase by a parametric generative design process.”
Abstract
Recently, cooperation between engineers and architects in the design process has faded,
specifically in tall building design procedures. While “the architectural form” directly affects a
building’s structural behavior, inadequate considerations of the “schematic design process” can
reduce structural efficiency. This presentation is a part of an ongoing research program whose main
purpose is to address structural behavior in the architectural form during the tall building design
process.
In this research, tall buildings schematic architectural forms were parametrically (in Grasshopper
plaguine in Rhinoceros software) generated based on the base plan, top plan, and a vertical
transformation method (tapered forms were focused in this research). A diagrid structure with a
tubular cross-section mapped on architectural forms. Then seismic load applies to each form with a
statically equivalent method. After all, the structure of all models analyzed in a parametric structure
plaguine (Karamba) and a comparison is made between all models structural efficiency.
Figure 1: The architectural forms (Pooyan Kazemi)
Figure 5: The Expected Design Weght in forms constituted of
similar base and top plan N-gon (Pooyan Kazemi)
Figure 3: The Drift in forms constituted of similar base
and top plan N-gon (Pooyan Kazemi)
Figure 2: The Drift diagram (Pooyan Kazemi)
Figure 4: The Expected Design Weght Diagram (Pooyan Kazemi)
Figure 6: The relation of Expected Design Weight and Drift (Pooyan Kazemi)
Structural Eciency of Tall Buildings:
by Means of Parametric Design
Key Points
• 144 potentially explorable forms were parametrically generated, based on previous research on form generation for tall
buildings, consisting of regular geometries in symmetric axial, top, and base floor plans. The geometry plans constituted
of simple polygons from 3-gon to 13-gon and 24-gon instead of circle. Overall forms were further generated by ascending
from the base plan to the top, according to curvilinear and morph vertical transformations, by means of generative
design.
• a tubular steel diagrid structure was generated and mapped on the architectural form. The diagrid angle in each form is
dependent to the number of vertices in top and base plans. Due to the abundance of models, a linear static parametric
structural analysis was done after lateral loads were determined and applied. For the sake of comparison, all generated
forms and structures follow the same parametric design process with highly similar specifications.
• all models were subject to comparison through factors indicating structural efficiency that had been used in similar
research, such as drift ratio, total mass, etc. Also, a novel structural efficiency factor is introduced as an “expected design
weight,” which represents the expected designed weight of the structural members of the building without going
through a structural element design process. This factor can be used as an indication of the cost of the building structure
for similar construction techniques in parametric design environments.
Conclusion
In this research, a comparison was made between the structural behavior of 144 architectural forms. The structural efficiency
of these forms mostly depends on the base plan (because all forms are tapered). in some cases, the increase of side count
of geometry plans causes better structural efficiency (less Drift and less Expected Design Weight) and vice versa. due to
the expected design weight and drift diagram, the forms that located on the secondary diagonals of architectural forms
matrix (these secondary diagonals of form matrix shown as blue), has similar drift or expected design weight approximately.
In simple forms which constituted of same top and base plans, the forms with the odd-sided polygon in geometry plans
have different structural behavior from the forms constituted of the even-sided polygon.Also the relation between drift and
expected design weight is linear approximately.