ArticlePDF Available

Small-Scale Agriculture as a Panacea in Enhancing South African Rural Economies

Authors:
  • Wise Research Consulting and Services

Abstract

The small-scale agricultural sector is considered as an indispensable role player in improving the South African rural economies by means of enhancing sustainable rural livelihoods. This paper critically assesses the contribution of small-scale agriculture in enhancing the South African rural economies. The South African Government have numerous agricultural interventions as an approach to improving rural livelihoods. Despite various policies and interventions that have been in place to ensure that small-scale agriculture improves rural economies; there is still a dearth of research in understanding small-scale agriculture dynamics that affect rural economies. Some of the essential aspects of the findings reveal that rural communities in South Africa regard small-scale agriculture as a source of income generation and enhancing food security. These findings highlight the negative effects on the South African small-scale agriculture suffering from insufficient productivity, infertility of soil, insufficient water and climate change. The poor access to markets and inadequate financial support services were identified as the major constraints that hinder small-scale agriculture to contribute to the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and rural economic development. The small-scale agricultural sector should come up with self-sufficient interventions to avoid dependence on the Government and other stakeholders.
Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies (ISSN: 2220-6140)
Vol. 10, No. 6, pp. 33-41, December 2018
33
Small-Scale Agriculture as a Panacea in Enhancing South African Rural Economies
*Mfaniseni Wiseman Mbatha1, Mfundo Mandla Masuku2
1University of Zululand, South Africa
2North West University, South Africa
Wisemanmbatha11@yahoo.com
Abstract: The small-scale agricultural sector is considered as an indispensable role player in improving the
South African rural economies by means of enhancing sustainable rural livelihoods. This paper critically
assesses the contribution of small-scale agriculture in enhancing the South African rural economies. The
South African Government have numerous agricultural interventions as an approach to improving rural
livelihoods. Despite various policies and interventions that have been in place to ensure that small-scale
agriculture improves rural economies; there is still a dearth of research in understanding small-scale
agriculture dynamics that affect rural economies. Some of the essential aspects of the findings reveal that
rural communities in South Africa regard small-scale agriculture as a source of income generation and
enhancing food security. These findings highlight the negative effects on the South African small-scale
agriculture suffering from insufficient productivity, infertility of soil, insufficient water and climate change.
The poor access to markets and inadequate financial support services were identified as the major
constraints that hinder small-scale agriculture to contribute to the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and rural
economic development. The small-scale agricultural sector should come up with self-sufficient interventions
to avoid dependence on the Government and other stakeholders.
Keywords: Climate Change, Rural Communities, Rural Economy, Small-Scale Agriculture, South Africa
1. Introduction
The agricultural sector is regarded as the main driver for rural economic development (Gomala & Baluchamy,
2018) an essential asset and primary source of income at a household level and in developing countries with
more than 69% of poor people in the world making a living in rural areas. USAID (2018) acknowledges that
almost 70% of Southern African rural communities depend on the agricultural sector to secure their
livelihoods. The South African Government regards the participation of rural communities in the agricultural
sector as a pivotal strategy to improve rural economies. In South African rural areas, small-scale agriculture is
characterised by the production in both crop and livestock farming systems where rural farmers work in
groups on a small portion of land (Lininger, 2011) intended to meet their household necessities (Mthembu,
2013). Due to the insufficient production in the South African agricultural sector and the lack of productivity
in rural farming systems identified by Lahiff & Cousins (2005); the South African rural economy is threatened
by inadequate economic activities that have resulted in restrictions in creating rural economic growth. Small-
scale agriculture intends to make a significant contribution to improving rural economies by way of creating
employment opportunities, provision of food and contributing to the Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Lehohla
(2016) state that there is a decline in rural agriculture since the estimated percentage shows only 13.8% of
South African rural households are still engaged in the agricultural sector as compared to 19.9% in 2011.
Small-scale agriculture is therefore vulnerable in contributing to rural economic development because of the
inadequate formal and informal infrastructure, poor market and low productivity of farming systems
(Mthembu, 2013). Sekaleli & Sebusi (2013), stress that the agricultural sector, which mostly depends on
rainfall is experiencing tragic failure in productivity caused by the impact of climate conditions. Therefore, it
has become critical to assess the contribution of small-scale agriculture towards enhancing South African
rural economies. This paper seeks to address two main objectives the first is to determine the role of small-
scale agriculture in enhancing rural economy; and to identify the challenges hindering small-scale agriculture
to enhance rural economies. There are vast studies that have been undertaken to validate the role played by
agriculture in spearheading rural communities in South Africa, included those by Van Zyl, Nel & Groenewald
(1988); Sihlobo & Nel (2016) and; Pfunzo (2017). However, there have been limited studies undertaken to
discuss the contribution of small-scale agriculture to rural economies in South Africa. The findings of this
paper will contribute to the body of knowledge by signifying the importance of prioritising small-scale
agriculture towards ensuring effective improvement in rural economies. The information retrieved from this
Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies (ISSN: 2220-6140)
Vol. 10, No. 6, pp. 33-41, December 2018
34
paper plays a vital role to comprehend the value of small-scale agriculture in improving rural economies. The
South African small-scale agricultural sector faces the danger of climate change of drought negatively
impacting.
2. Literature Review
The contribution of both subsistence and small-scale agriculture in improving the rural economy is not well
studied in South Africa. Kleinbooi (2010) suggested the need to review the procedures used in exploring
studies researching small-scale agriculture to ensure it accurately records the role of small-scale agriculture
and its potential in contributing to rural economic development. The contribution of small-agriculture in the
South African rural economy is not well recognised or documented because there is a dearth of
environmental policies supporting and protecting rural farmers from all possible risks they may face
(Khwidzhili & Worth, 2017). This has resulted in negative outcomes on the role of small-scale agriculture in
accessing the market and its contribution to the GDP to enhance the rural economy. This section reviews
literature that is related to the small-scale agriculture and its contribution to rural economies.
General Overview on Small-Scale Agriculture in South Africa: Small-scale agriculture is described as a
sector where rural communities apply their indigenous knowledge for farming to ensure that their farms are
productive (Simelane, 2017). South African small-scale agriculture is characterised by the production in a
dualistic farming system, which includes both crop and livestock farming (Lininger, 2011). The integration of
both crop and livestock farming has turned out to be very low in terms of productivity and has a negative
impact on the contribution of small-scale agriculture in improving rural economies (Siegmund-Schultze et al.,
2013). Small-scale agriculture is a process of transforming subsistence agriculture to commercial agriculture
with the purpose of selling their products to the market and ensuring the availability of food in their
households (Tagar & Shah, 2012). Small-scale agriculture is a major contribution to ensuring food security,
creating employment opportunities and reducing poverty in rural households worldwide. Mthembu (2013)
state that 92% of rural households engage in agriculture with the purpose of producing food and small-scale
agriculture creating employment opportunities for almost four million of the Country’s population.
Households participate in small-scale agriculture with the purpose of generating income in order to
supplement their household expenses. These two incentives have turned out to be a proposition that plays a
crucial role in supporting and motivating rural farmers to engage in small-scale agriculture and towards
improving the standard of living in rural communities (Aliber, 2011). South Africa is reported to have an
adequate production of food more especially at the national sphere (Baiphethi & Jacobs, 2009). Regardless of
small-scale agriculture contributing to both food and income, it is also expected to contribute to the Country’s
GDP making sure there is an improvement in rural economies. Small-scale agriculture is struggling to
contribute to the rural economy since rural communities participate in unstable rural based markets
whereby they sell their product to other residents and neighbours. It is estimated that the agricultural sector
contributes less than 3% in the GDP while contributing 7.2% towards formal employment. On the other hand,
the Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (2017) indicated that in South Africa, the agricultural
sector was estimated to have the production value of R 273 333 million and it contributed almost R 80 245
million in 2016.
Challenges that Hinders Small-Scale Agriculture to Contribute in Rural Economy: The South African
small-scale agricultural sector is currently suffering from the consequences of climate change crippling
productivity of the agricultural sector (Mthembu, 2008). Ren et al. (2018) agreed that climate change
conditions have a negative effect on the agricultural sector worldwide, with a tragic decline in agricultural
production due to the number of incidences of natural disasters. The incidence of drought has led to the
scarcity of water for irrigation during the dry seasons creating a struggle in small-scale agriculture to produce
sufficient product to be sold in the market. Rowhani et al. (2011) state that climate change brings many
fluctuations in the production of the country’s agricultural sector and in turn an obstacle in the contribution
of small-scale agriculture in rural economies. On the other hand, Chikazunga & Paradza (2012) perceived that
small-scale agriculture has little to offer in rural economies because of the unavailability of financial support
system in order to assist poor rural farmers. Hanf (2014), identified that the neglect of rural small-scale
agriculture by the South African Government which focuses more on supporting the commercial agricultural
Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies (ISSN: 2220-6140)
Vol. 10, No. 6, pp. 33-41, December 2018
35
sector. Small-scale farmers become vulnerable with no financial support to purchase fertilizers and feeding
resources to assist in keeping the farming sector more productive. Greenberg (2013) state that small-scale
farmers experience these problems because the Government provides more support for the large-scale
farming sector, aiming to adapt to the competition that takes place in a global level. Van Rooyen et al. (2017)
agreed to most countries governments and benefactors focus more on assisting large-scale farmers by paying
for infrastructural services.
3. Methodology and Materials
Data Collection and Analysis: The case study research was adopted in order to collect secondary data that is
relevant to the small-scale agriculture and rural economy. This paper relied on secondary data to analyse the
contribution of the small-scale agricultural sector in enhancing the rural economy. The case study played a
significant role in understanding previous and the complex issues hindering the contribution of small-scale
agriculture in rural economies. Zainal (2007) state that the case study method enabled researchers to reach
the further side of the quantitative statistics results. Case studies help a researcher to include both
quantitative and qualitative data in explaining the process and outcome of the phenomenon by the full
reconstruction and analysis of cases that are under investigation. The case study helps researchers to collect
the relevant information from different sources including officially published materials, technical reports and
documentation of data collection methods and procedures (Johnston, 2017). For the purpose of data analyses,
this paper adopted textual analysis as a tool to analyse reviewed literature, relevant to the small-scale
agriculture and its contribution to rural economies.
Theoretical Framework: The modernisation of agriculture through the modernisation theory was adopted
because of its strength and positive orientation to enable poor rural people to be part of the social and
economic development. Modernisation theory is often used to provide a full explanation of the processes of
agricultural transformation within societies. Power (2004) referred to the modernisation process to a model
of bringing transformation from the traditional societies to modern societies. Concerning the agricultural
sector, modernisation theory promotes a shift away from practising traditional agricultural methods to
adopting modern methods of agricultural practice. Toringepi (2016) mention that the modernisation theory
gave the small-scale farmers an option to substitute traditional agricultural methods (such as depending on
rainfall, hand digging, shift cultivation), with modern agricultural methods (such as utilisation of advanced
machines and fertilisers). Power (2004) further clarified that this theory focused on the principles, which
states there is a strong connection between the social and economic development towards bringing
significant progress and improvement in human development. The modernisation theory encourages the
adoption of technological process in order to assist rural communities to have control over their farming
systems. The adaptation of technological advancement is pivotal in the background of this paper since small-
scale agriculture currently linked with an underprivileged level of technology (Toringepi, 2016).
If small-scale agriculture can be granted the opportunity to be modernised, they can contribute to the
economic development of rural communities. Barnett et al. (1995) modernisation phenomenon include a full
range of changes and transformation which all traditional societies have to follow to reach the level of being
modernised. The process of modernisation in small-scale agriculture encompasses guidance and motivation
for farmers to start using new production, crops and try new marketing skills. Toringepi (2016) claim that
modernisation of the agricultural sector introduced to the diversification of farming systems, utilisation of
chemical fertilisers, tractors and the adoption of different scientific knowledge to replace traditional
agricultural methods. Small-scale agriculture should be regarded as modern once farmers show some specific
features. These features include being able to take effective decisions, having high technological skills and
understanding the value of production (Toringepi, 2016). There are challenges faced by small-scale
agriculture in most developing countries including inadequate scientific knowledge, lack of equipment and
scant marketing skills. Previous research of the model revealed that governments in most developing
countries do not focus on the role of small-scale agriculture in addressing rural issues ensuring rural
economic development (Lewis, 2013).
Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies (ISSN: 2220-6140)
Vol. 10, No. 6, pp. 33-41, December 2018
36
4. Results and Discussion
The Nature of Agricultural Sector in South Africa: The results show that South Africa has two categories of
agriculture. It is subsistence agriculture, usually practised by rural farmers; and large-scale agriculture,
mainly practised by white people for commercial purposes. Tagar & Shah (2012) point out that small-scale
agriculture is to transform subsistence agriculture to commercial agriculture by enabling rural communities
to improve the rural economy and sustainable livelihoods. Despite the important role of small-scale
agriculture in South African rural economies, studies have shown that there are insufficient details and
reliable empirical evidence about the existence and operation of small-scale agriculture in rural areas. This
includes the shortage of recorded data about the trades, value and volume production of small-scale
agriculture in South Africa (Lahiff & Cousins, 2005; Ngcoya & Kumarakulasingam, 2017). Based on the
aforementioned circumstances, data pertaining to agriculture is being collected through community surveys
by Statistics South Africa, with the intention of understanding the nature of small-scale agricultural practice
at the level of households in South Africa. Figure 1, clearly displays the percentage of household participation
in the South African agricultural sector in 2016.
Figure 1: Percentage of Household Participation in South African Agricultural Sector in 2016
Source: Statistics South Africa, 2017.
Figure 1 showed that in 2016, 15.6% of South African households were engaged in agricultural activities with
an increase of 0.8% as compared to 14.8% in 2015. It has been recognised that 9.9% of these households
have cultivated farmlands, whilst 92.7% were engaged on small-scale farming (Statistics SA, 2017) including
backyard gardens. The small-scale agriculture was dominated by the dualistic farming system, which includes
both crop and livestock farming in some rural areas in South Africa. Statistics South Africa (2017) showed
that the South African household from their small-scale agriculture produced 53.4% of crops (both fruits and
vegetables) and 47.1% of livestock in 2016. In 2016, only 11.1% of agricultural households have received
support from the Government to improve their small-scale agriculture. In contrast, only 2.2% of those
households who have received assistance through training and 7.0% received assistance pertaining to
livestock vaccination services (Statistic South Africa, 2017).
Reasons for Small-Scale Agriculture in South African Rural Areas: Aliber (2011) agreed that the
percentage in the productivity of livestock and crops as mentioned above have turned out to be a proposition
that plays a crucial role in motivating rural farmers to participate in small-scale agriculture toward improving
the standard of living in their communities. Therefore, small-scale agriculture (see Figure 2) can be mainly
observed as both a source of income and food in South Africa.
Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies (ISSN: 2220-6140)
Vol. 10, No. 6, pp. 33-41, December 2018
37
Figure 2: Reasons for Engaging on Small-Scale Agriculture in South Africa
Source: Statistics South Africa, 2017
Small-Scale Agriculture as a Source of Food for Rural Communities: Figure 2 shows that almost 78.5% of
South African households engage in agriculture to secure an additional source of food and income.
Households engaging in small-scale agriculture as an additional source of food, more especially in rural areas
can be seen as a motivating factor in the following provinces: Limpopo Province at 91.5%; Eastern Cape
Province with 81.9%; and Mpumalanga Province with 79.0%. Baiphethi & Jacobs (2009) found that in South
Africa, the issue of food insecurity has an impact on poor individuals who reside in urban areas. They are
dependent on accessing food from markets, which is different from the rural context where people directly
engage in subsistence and small-scale agriculture to ensure the availability of food and generating a source of
income. Ruel et al., (1998); and Baiphethi & Jacobs (2009) note a severe increment on the reliance of rural
and urban area households in purchasing food from the market. The expenditures on purchasing food from
the markets can be estimated to be almost 60-80 % which is made up by the total income of households
dominated by individuals with low income from urban areas.
Small-Scale Agriculture as a Source of Income for Rural Communities: The availability of employment
opportunities for rural communities in small-scale agriculture could determine the sustainable generation of
income for rural populace. Aref (2011) affirm that small-scale agriculture has made a significant contribution
in generating income for rural households. The South African agricultural sector is currently unable to
effectively contribute in the creation of job opportunities, following a decline of about 0.3% in agricultural
employment opportunities during the first quarter of 2018 from 4.8% of the fourth quarter in 2017 (Statistic
SA, 2018). In 2016, South African rural households experienced a huge decline in agricultural productivity
(Lehohla, 2016). Figure 2 depicts two of the nine South African provinces North West (26.6%) and Northern
Cape (21.6%) regard small-scale agriculture as an extra source of income. The contribution of small-scale
agriculture in household income is too low compared to that of food per households. In the first quarter of
2018, Statistics South Africa (2018) indicate that only 5.3 % of South African households engage in
agriculture as an extra source of income while 2.2% view it as a main source of income.
Challenges that Hinders Small-Scale Agriculture to Contribute in Rural Economy: Ikerd (2011) assert
that small-scale agriculture must be able to protect the productivity of land and enhance the rural economy.
The productivity of small-scale agriculture is facing challenges which constraint farmers’ from benefiting
from their farming activities in rural areas. The small-scale agriculture is currently struggling to enhance
rural economies due to the following challenges:
Issues of Climate Change: It has been recognised that the entire agricultural sector is in serious jeopardy
due to the circumstances of climate change conditions (Ojoyi et al., 2017). Small-scale agriculture in South
African rural areas become more vulnerable to climate change conditions since they depend more on rainfall
during the summer season. The effects of climate change have put rural economies in danger with the lack of
water and food availability. Following the drought experience between the 2015 and 2016 the Country due to
climate change has affected the productivity of small-scale agriculture in South Africa, see Figure 3 below.
Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies (ISSN: 2220-6140)
Vol. 10, No. 6, pp. 33-41, December 2018
38
Figure 3: Showing Drought Conditions in South Africa (2015-2016)
Source: Lehohla, 2016
The incidence of drought as it appears in Figure 3, negatively led to water scarcity leaving small-scale
agriculture with no water for irrigation, especially during winter. Hristov et al. (2018) point out that
productivity in livestock and crop systems are vulnerable because of climate change. Small-scale agriculture
is an essential instrument in improving the rural economy, it is important that it remains productive even
during the times of climate change so that it will manage to contribute in enhancing the rural livelihoods and
economies. Ren et al. (2018) suggested that rural farmers create strategies to adapt to climate change
circumstances by keeping small-scale agriculture productive and the ability to improve their economies.
Inadequate Infrastructural Services and Access to the Markets: Khandker & Samad (2018) identified
prioritising investment in rural infrastructural facilities (such as irrigation systems, roads,
telecommunications and so forth) could have an appropriate impact on small-scale agriculture enhancing
rural economies. Simelane (2017) point out that small-scale farmers may have insufficient experience in
technology to sustain their agricultural activities and accessing major markets. Infrastructural service in the
South African rural areas remains a serious problem as the majority of small-scale farmers lack transport to
access the markets and irrigation systems to facilitate their farms. The markets play an essential role in
improving rural economies, since most South African farmers have a desire to sell their products to the
market (Kapungu, 2013). The small-scale agricultural sector is still unable to gain access to the markets due
to poor transport systems not catering to agricultural produce or production. This issue has been a persisting
challenge in most South African rural areas where small-scale farmers use inappropriate transport to supply
their product to the markets (Bourguignon & Pleskovic, 2008; Mthembu, 2008).
Transport services (such as roads) have an essential role to play in linking rural farmers with the market and
circulating information when telecommunications are not available. The lack of transport services is still an
issue that many rural areas across the globe experience. The lack of irrigation systems was also recognised as
a hindrance for small-scale agriculture to be sustainable and contribute to rural economies. Antunes et al.
(2017) regarded the irrigation system as the main activity necessary in making assurances that small-scale
agriculture is sustainable and solidifying the existence of the environmental system for small-scale farmers to
continue participating in their activities (Antunes et al., 2017). These activities involve livestock and cropping
systems that rely more on rainfall for its survival. Mosha (2018) identified rural areas where the farmers
experience the absence and inadequate irrigation systems used to sustain the productivity of their small-scale
agricultural sector. Small-scale farmers cannot afford to buy irrigation facilities due to the lack of financial
support.
Inadequate Financial Support Service: The growth and contribution of small-scale agriculture in improving
the standard of livelihoods and rural economies rely on the accessibility of financial support. The process of
sustaining and transportation of products to the markets requires sufficient funds. The sad reality is that the
small-scale agricultural sector still experiences the draughtiness in terms of financial support for rural
farmers (Ruete, 2015) through the non-existence of policies introduced by Government to cater directly for
rural farmers in the expansion of banking services through formal stakeholders and financial institutions. In
South Africa, the main focus of Government is not on small-scale farmers but large-scale farmers, since
Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies (ISSN: 2220-6140)
Vol. 10, No. 6, pp. 33-41, December 2018
39
Government does not manage to compensate for infrastructural facilities for rural farmers to access the
markets. This situation leaves small-scale farmers unable to purchase enough feeding and fertiliser resources
to cultivate their farms (Siegmund-Schultze et al., 2013).
5. Conclusion
This paper determined the role of small-scale agriculture in enhancing rural economies whilst pondering the
challenges in doing so. In this regard, the findings have shown that the South African small-scale agriculture is
dominated by crop and livestock activities in rural areas. Therefore, small-scale agriculture has reported to be
struggling to play a significant role in improving rural economies and livelihoods. The challenges that faced
the small-scale agriculture include climate change conditions and insufficient support services from
Government which is crippling the sustainability of rural livelihoods and rural economy. The poor
infrastructural facilities in rural areas have shown to be a disadvantage to rural farmers since they are unable
to access the market and compete with the commercial farming sector. This is due to the lack of financial
support services to assist rural farmers, with the results indicating that Government puts more focus on the
large-scale farmers while farmers in rural areas are unable to meet the needs and demand of the markets.
Recommendations: The paper proposes the following recommendations to address the issues that hinder
the contribution of small-scale agriculture in enhancing the South African rural economy:
Establishment of Rural Based Markets: The access to markets has been reported to be a problem hindering
small-scale agriculture to contribute to rural economic development. Therefore, it is recommended that the
South African Government should develop interventions for the small-scale agricultural sector to build rural
based markets that would be a centre of connection between rural farmers and the market. This includes the
advancement of technology such as online marketing strategies. It is also recommended to strengthen the
rural-based market by investing in research and development to ensure the sustainability of rural livelihoods
and the improvement of rural development.
Climate Change Adaptation Strategy: Climate change is a serious threat to the productivity and
contribution of small-scale agriculture in improving rural economies. It is essential to bring some
diversification in managing the small-scale agricultural practice. This includes a rotation in planting periods
and density and processes in cultivation strategies, which would play a significant role in acting against the
results of restricted moisture in order to reduce and neutralise climate change conditions. The conservation
of different types of seeds that would protect the environmental diversity from danger and grant small-scale
farmers with a prospect to make well-informed adoption strategies, that could be utilised towards fighting
against the climate change conditions and enhancing rural economic development.
Strengthen Financial Support: The inadequate financial support services have proved to be an issue in the
contribution of small-scale agriculture in rural economies. It is recommended that public or private sectors
intervene in order to implement formal financial institutions which will play a significant role in the
expansion of banking services in favour of rural communities. This initiative will play an important role as
small-scale farmers will be able even to borrow money (loans) to purchase needed products (fertilizers,
feeding resources, transport, irrigation facilities) required to sustain the productivity of their farms.
References
Aliber, M. (2011). Strategies to support South African smallholders as a contribution to government’s second
economy strategy: Case studies.
Antunes, P., Santos, R., Cosme, I., Osann, A., Calera, A., De Ketelaere, D., Spiteri, A., Mejuto, M. F., Andreu, J.,
Momblanch, A. & Nino, P. (2017). A holistic framework to assess the sustainability of irrigated
agricultural systems. Cogent Food & Agriculture, 3(1), 1-25.
Aref, F. (2011). Farmers' participation in agricultural development: The case of Fars province, Iran. Indian
Journal of Science and Technology, 4(2), 155-158.
Baiphethi, M. N. & Jacobs, P. T (2009). The contribution of subsistence farming to food security in South
Africa. Agrekon, 48(4), 459-482.
Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies (ISSN: 2220-6140)
Vol. 10, No. 6, pp. 33-41, December 2018
40
Barnett, V., Payne, R. & Steiner, R. (1995). Agricultural sustainability: Economic, environmental and statistical
considerations. John Wiley and Sons, pp 1- 278.
Bourguignon, F. & Pleskovic, B. (2008). Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics-Global
2007: Rethinking Infrastructure for Development. 1st ed. [pdf] Washington: World Bank.
Chikazunga, D. & Paradza, G. (2012). Can smallholder farmers find a home in South Africa’s food-system?
Lessons from Limpopo Province.
Department of Agriculture Forestry. & Fisheries. (2017). Economic Review of the South African Agriculture
2016/17. South Africa. DAFF.
Filtane, M. L. (2016). Parliament address on the impact of SA’s drought on the agricultural economy.
Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries. United Democratic Movement (UDM).
Gomala, T. B. & Baluchamy, S. (2018). Impact of socioeconomic conditions of Dalit women with respect to
rural areas in Dindigul district of Tamil Nadu. International Journal of Research in Humanities, Arts
and Science, 2(3), 21-25.
Greenberg, S. (2013). The disjunctures of land and agricultural reform in South Africa: Implications for the
agri-food system. Working Paper 26. Institute for Poverty, Land and Agrarian Studies, University of
the Western Cape: Bellville, South Africa.
Hanf, J. H. (2014). Processor driven integration of small-scale farmers into value chains in Eastern Europe and
Central Asia: A synthesis paper. [Pdf] Europe and Central Asia: FAO of the United Nations.
http://www.fao.org/3/a-au847e.pdf [Accessed 23 July 2018]
Hristov, A. N., Degaetano, A. T., Rotz, C. A., Hoberg, E., Skinner, R. H., Felix, T., Li, H., Patterson, P. H., Roth, G.,
Hall, M. & Ott, T. L. (2018). Climate change effects on livestock in the Northeast US and strategies for
adaptation. Climatic Change, 146(1-2), 33-45.
Ikerd, J. (2011). Economics of sustainable farming. In Proceedings of the 19th Annual Grazing Conference.
[pdf] United State of America.
Johnston, M. P. (2017). Secondary data analysis: A method of which the time has come. Qualitative and
Quantitative Methods in Libraries, 3(3), 619-626.
Kapungu, S. T. (2013). A study of rural women farmers' access to markets in Chirumanzu. PhD. Stellenbosch
University. http://scholar.sun.ac.za/handle/10019.1/80238 [Accessed 01 July 2018]
Khandker, S. R. & Samad, H. A. (2018). Bangladesh’s Structural Transformation: The Role of Infrastructure. In
Economic and Social Development of Bangladesh. 1st ed. [ebook] Palgrave Macmillan: Cham, pp. 71-
92.
Khwidzhili, R. H. & Worth, S. H. (2017). Evaluation of policies promoting sustainable agriculture in South
Africa. South African Journal of Agricultural Extension, 45(2), 73-85.
Kleinbooi, K. (2010). Review of land reforms in southern Africa 2010. [pdf] 1st ed. Bellville, Cape Town:
Institute for Poverty, Land and Agrarian Studies (PLAAS).
Lahiff, E. & Cousins, B. (2005). Smallholder agriculture and land reform in South Africa. IDS Bulletin, 36(2),
127-131.
Lehohla, P. (2016). Community Survey 2016: Agricultural households. Statistics South African.
Lewis, W. A. (2013). The Principles of Economic Planning: A study prepared for the Fabian Society. London
and New York: Routledge.
Lininger, K. (2011). Small-scale farming and shifting cultivation. The root of the problem what’s driving
tropical deforestation today? [pdf] Cambridge.
Mosha, D. B., Vedeld, P., Katani, J. Z., Kajembe, G. C. & Tarimo, A. K. (2018). Contribution of Paddy Production
to Household Income in Farmer-Managed Irrigation Scheme Communities in Iringa Rural and
Kilombero Districts, Tanzania. Journal of Agricultural Studies, 6(2), 100-122.
Mthembu, N. (2008). Perceptions of barriers to market participation among three farmer groups in rural
KwaZulu-Natal.
Mthembu, N. N. (2013). Exploring characteristics of farming systems in former labour tenant communities:
the case of Ncunjane and Nkaseni in Msinga. Master’s thesis. University of the Western Cape, South
Africa. http://etd.uwc.ac.za/handle/11394/4267 [Accessed 28 July 2018]
Ngcoya, M. & Kumarakulasingam, N. (2017). The Lived Experience of Food Sovereignty: Gender, Indigenous
Crops and Small‐Scale Farming in Mtubatuba, South Africa. Journal of Agrarian Change, 17(3), 480-
496.
Ojoyi, M., Mutanga, O., Kahinda, J. M., Odindi, J. & Abdel-Rahman, E. M. (2017). Scenario-based approach in
dealing with climate change impacts in Central Tanzania. Futures, 85, 30-41.
Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies (ISSN: 2220-6140)
Vol. 10, No. 6, pp. 33-41, December 2018
41
Pfunzo, R. (2017). Agriculture's contribution to economic growth and development in rural Limpopo
Province: a SAM multiplier analysis. Doctoral dissertation. Stellenbosch University, South Africa.
http://scholar.sun.ac.za/handle/10019.1/101160 [Accessed 02 July 2018]
Power, M. (2004). Rethinking Development Geographies. 1st ed. London: Routledge.
Ren, X., Weitzel, M., O’Neill, B. C., Lawrence, P., Meiyappan, P., Levis, S., Balistreri, E. J. & Dalton, M. (2018).
Avoided economic impacts of climate change on agriculture: integrating a land surface model (CLM)
with a global economic model (iPETS). Climatic Change, 146(3-4), 517-531.
Rowhani, P., Lobell, D. B., Linderman, M. & Ramankutty, N. (2011). Climate variability and crop production in
Tanzania. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 151(4), 449- 460.
Ruel, M. T., Garrett, J. L., Morris, S. S., Maxwell, D., Oshaug, A., Engle, P., Menon, P., Slack, A. & Haddad, L.
(1998). Urban challenges to food and nutrition security: a review of food security, health, and
caregiving in the cities. [pdf] Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.
Ruete, M. (2015). Financing for Agriculture: How to boost opportunities in developing countries: Investment
in Agriculture, Policy Brief #3 [pdf] Canada: International Institute for Sustainable Development.
Sekaleli, T. S. T. & Sebusi, K. (2013). Farmers' Response and Adaptation Strategies to Climate Change in
Mafeteng District, Lesotho. [pdf] Lesotho: African Technology Policy Studies Network.
Siegmund-Schultze, M., Rischkowsky, B., Yuldashev, I., Abdalniyazov, B. & Lamers, J. P. A. (2013). The
emerging small-scale cattle farming sector in Uzbekistan: Highly integrated with crop production but
suffering from low productivity. Journal of arid environments, 98, 93-104.
Sihlobo, W. & Nel, L. (2016). Is South Africa’s agricultural sector addressing inclusive socio-economic
development? Opportunity for Change, 68, 65-81.
Simelane, N. D. (2017). The role of small-scale agriculture in poverty reduction in Cezwana area Jozini Local
Municipality (KZ 272). Doctoral dissertation.
Statistics South Africa. (2017). General Household Survey 2017. Stats SA.
https://www.statssa.gov.za/publications/P0318/P03182016.pdf [Accessed 29 June 2018]
Statistics South Africa. (2018). Quarterly Labour Force Survey Quarter 1: 2018. Stats SA.
http://www.statssa.gov.za/?p=11139 [Accessed 29 June 2018]
Tagar, H. K. & Shah, S. R. A. (2012). Agricultural Development: Meanings, Modes and Models (A Feasible
Model for Sindh-Pakistan). International Journal of Innovative Research and Development, 1(8), 54-75.
Toringepi, G. (2016). The contribution of smallholder agriculture production to food security in rural
Zimbabwe: A Case Study of Masvingo Province. Doctoral Dissertation. University of Fort Hare, South
Africa.
USAID. (2018). Agriculture and Food Security. [online] United States Agency for International Development
(USAID): Southern Africa Regional. https://www.usaid.gov/southern-africa-regional/agriculture-
and-food-security. [Accessed 11 July 2018]
van Rooyen, A. F., Ramshaw, P., Moyo, M., Stirzaker, R. & Bjornlund, H. (2017). Theory and application of
agricultural innovation platforms for improved irrigation scheme management in Southern Africa.
International Journal of Water Resources Development, 33(5), 804- 823.
Van Zyl, J., Nel, H. J. G. & Groenewald, J. A. (1988). Agriculture's contribution to the South African
economy. Agrekon, 27(2), 1- 9.
Zainal, Z. (2007). Case study as a research method. Jurnal Kemanusiaan, 9, 1- 6.
... Namely, decades of neglecting agriculture have taken their toll and led to low productivity and stagnation of agricultural production in many countries (Sharma, Lahiri, Neogi & Akhter, 2021). Some of the notable examples include African countries (Mfaniseni Wiseman & Mfundo Mandla, 2018), and transition economies (Kuhn & Bobojonov, forthcoming). In this regard, as one of the possible solutions, foreign direct investments in agriculture are imposed. ...
Article
Full-text available
Despite being marginal in both general and scientific public, land acquisitions have brought agricultural land in the unprecedented focus of interest. The causes of these changes are the consequence of, inter alia, the growing world population, which undeniably leads to the increased need for agricultural products. Therefore, in this article the most relevant cause of agricultural land acquisitions is considered – growing food demand. The history suggests that the acquisitions of agricultural lands are not a new phenomenon, but rather a new wave of déjà vu. However, what differentiates this wave of acquisitions from previous ones are, inter alia, its causes. The latest wave of agricultural land acquisitions, according to the general understanding, started with the global financial crisis. In these circumstances, the growing demand for land acquisition began, which led developing countries to realize that the purchase of agricultural land, despite its potentially negative effects, could serve as a catalyst for economic development. We drew the conclusion that more than a third of all the cross-border land acquisitions were caused by the growing food demand. The results of the research show that the growth of land acquisitions follows the growth of world population, implying that the demand for agricultural land will not be stagnant for at least three more decades. In other words, land acquisitions undeniably are in continuo. This implies the need that foreign direct investment policies in agriculture, are defined in a way which would maximise the benefits and minimise any potential drawbacks.
... These dynamics of on-farm vs. off-farm income are important to understand how households patch together a livelihood from all the different sources and what this means for the role of agriculture in each region. Complementary to the findings of Mbatha and Masuku (2018), small-scale farming could be seen as "enhancing" rural economies by contributing food, although it is not the primary source of income for many households as was reported for households in Ghana and Côte d'Ivoire (Alemayehu et al., 2022). Even so, our results indicate that there is potential for small-scale farming to be explored as a primary source of income for a few households (those on the right-hand side of Figures 3, 4). ...
Article
Full-text available
Small-scale farming plays a critical role in the food security of Africa. An analysis of households in two former homelands provided critical insights into the future of small-scale farming in South Africa. From a survey of 132 households, 57 from Emmaus in the uKhahlamba local municipality in KwaZulu Natal Province and 75 from Thaba Nchu in the Mangaung Metropolitan municipality of the Free State province, indicators of food and nutrition security, income, and the relative contributions of on-farm versus off-farm sources to household welfare were calculated to determine if small-scale farming could drive the economy of these areas. Results revealed stark differences at household and regional levels and were attributed to the importance of crops vs. livestock toward household welfare and the proximity of the regions to urban centers. This was demonstrated by more reliance on arable farming in Emmaus, unlike Thaba Nchu, where a nearby city allowed diversification of income portfolios. In both regions, labor constraints outweighed land limitations. It is, therefore, unlikely that increasing arable land of small-scale farmers alone will stimulate arable farming. On-farm production and consumption did not guarantee nutrition and food security. Currently, small-scale farming did not serve as an engine for economic growth in the communities and formed a small part of the income of most households. However, sustainable intensification of farm production is a plausible pathway for the small number of households for whom farming forms an important part of their income. These households have the potential to engage in more commercial activities if farming and policies can be aligned. A critical knowledge gap is how, under what context, and which forms of agricultural interventions may complement rural development efforts and contribute to the rural economy.
... Smallholder agriculture has been identified as one of the most important economic assets for many South Africans who live in rural areas [1], as about 70 percent of rural dwellers in southern Africa rely on the agricultural sector for their livelihood [2]. According to [3], smallholder agriculture in South Africa is perceived as a livelihood option to achieve poverty reduction and rural development goals. ...
Article
Full-text available
The importance of agricultural cooperatives and other community-based organizations in facilitating sustainable agricultural development in South Africa cannot be downplayed. The aim of the study was to analyse smallholder farmers’ perception of the effectiveness of agricultural cooperatives in rendering support services to their enterprise in Mpumalanga Province of South Africa. A multistage sampling procedure was employed to elicit data from a sample of 120 smallholder farmers drawn from 150 farmers—members who were currently active members of agricultural cooperatives. A structured questionnaire was used to collect data that were analysed using descriptive statistics. Multiple linear regression was used to determine the socio-economic and institutional factors influencing the member farmers’ perception of cooperative effectiveness. The findings revealed that although agricultural cooperatives in the area rendered some level of support services to their members, the majority of the respondents perceived their cooperative as ineffective in rendering some key support services to them that could potentially improve their livelihoods. The results of inferential analysis indicate that factors such as farm size, level of education, household size, farming experience, major crop grown/animal reared, number of cooperative members, support services received index, and satisfaction of leadership processes were significant socioeconomic and institutional factors that influence respondent’s perception. The study recommended increased government public recognition and support for agricultural cooperatives development, increased resource base through more access to grant and donations, and improved linkages between cooperatives and extension agencies as a means of improving the effectiveness of agricultural cooperatives in the area.
... Namely, decades of neglecting agriculture have taken their toll and led to low productivity and stagnation of agricultural production in many countries (Sharma, Lahiri, Neogi & Akhter, 2021). Some of the notable examples include African countries (Mfaniseni Wiseman & Mfundo Mandla, 2018), and transition economies (Kuhn & Bobojonov, forthcoming). In this regard, as one of the possible solutions, foreign direct investments in agriculture are imposed. ...
Article
Full-text available
Despite being marginal in both general and scientific public, land acquisitions have brought agricultural land in the unprecedented focus of interest. The causes of these changes are the consequence of, inter alia, the growing world population, which undeniably leads to the increased need for agricultural products. Therefore, in this article the most relevant cause of agricultural land acquisitions is considered – growing food demand. The history suggests that the acquisitions of agricultural lands are not a new phenomenon, but rather a new wave of déjà vu. However, what differentiates this wave of acquisitions from previous ones are, inter alia, its causes. The latest wave of agricultural land acquisitions, according to the general understanding, started with the global financial crisis. In these circumstances, the growing demand for land acquisition began, which led developing countries to realize that the purchase of agricultural land, despite its potentially negative effects, could serve as a catalyst for economic development. We drew the conclusion that more than a third of all the cross-border land acquisitions were caused by the growing food demand. The results of the research show that the growth of land acquisitions follows the growth of world population, implying that the demand for agricultural land will not be stagnant for at least three more decades. In other words, land acquisitions undeniably are in continuo. This implies the need that foreign direct investment policies in agriculture, are defined in a way which would maximise the benefits and minimise any potential drawbacks.
... With contemporary hindrances, Balikumbat Sub-Division peasants attest to the predictions of the third and fourth Assessment Reports of the Inter-Governmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) cited by Boko, M. et al., [5] that foresaw devastating effects on agriculture due to climate change scenarios. The notion of agriculture has generally been looked upon by Berinyuy, Chinedum and Mfaniseni [6][7][8] with a large degree of positivity because of its significant role in poverty alleviation and live sustainability, justifying why it was the alternative to cash crop production after the economic crisis of 1980s. Thus, this finding considers whether the social necessities of enhancing livelihood and attaining desirable development could be accomplished after investment in agriculture. ...
Article
Full-text available
The rural poor depend primarily on small-scale agriculture and related activities to enhance livelihoods. They wrest a living through agriculture, though with many challenges. The study investigates the contribution of small-scale agriculture to livelihood improvement and the challenges faced by small farmers in Balikumbat SubDivision (North-West Region, Cameroon). The hypothetic-deductive approach was used to test the hypotheses obtained via a systematic and a random sampling technique, with 97 respondents from 5 villages in the SubDivision. Supplementary primary data were obtained from questionnaire respondents, interviewees and from focus group discussion participants. The questionnaire administered focused on small-scale agriculture vis-à-vis livelihood improvement. Field data was processed and analyzed using inferential statistical tool (chi-square) with the aid of Statistical Package for Social Science. The calculated chi-square results revealed that physical and human challenges affect, to a greater extent, small-scale agriculture. Small-scale agriculture being the primary source of income in Balikumbat SubDivision , contributes extensively in enhancing livelihood. However, findings suggest that 84.9% respondents attested that physical setbacks dominate challenges wrecking small-scale agriculture despite its importance in providing households basic needs. 65% of crop producers confirmed to the lucrativeness of small-scale farming. A second-guess of sensitization for this activity should be envisaged in order for it to have a tremendous positive visible result in the area.
... Thus, Adulunle (2018) asserts that the small-scale farming sector has played a measurable role in addressing global food crisis by creating an alternative means of income and food stability for the rural population. In Mpumalanga province (South Africa) for in-stance, 79% of the population is engaged in the small-scale farming sector (Masuku & Mbatha 2018). This proves JOURNAL LA SOCIALE VOL. ...
Article
Full-text available
The paper has aimed to explore the effectiveness of small-scale farmers in improving household income and food security, particularly looking at the barriers to market access in rural areas. This study was undertaken in rural areas of Kanyamazane, Clau-Clau and Nyongane, South Africa, where small-scale producers depend on low-risk and low-return markets to generate household income from production, thus ensuring food security. To achieve the aim of this study, a qualitative approach was used to provide in-depth interpretation of the perspectives, experiences, and behavioural patterns of the small-scale farmers faced with market related issues. Small-scale farmers, agricultural extension officers, and municipal officials were purposefully selected to share their views, perceptions, and experiences on the effectiveness in accessing markets. The findings revealed that there was limited access to formal markets by small-scale farmers because of limited knowledge and capacity to meet market requirements. The study confirmed that a lack of marketing skills, institutional support services, and limited access to arable land, have directly negative effects on achieving livelihood outcomes. This study recommends a sustainable crop production method which reduces the costs of farming resources, such as pesticide and fertilizer, through organic methods to ensure food safety and enhanced nutrient quality. This study further encourages inclusive rural development, where small-scale producers are treated as stakeholders in agricultural policy formulation to enable access to financial resources and increase in production through the formation of cooperatives.
Article
Purpose This study aims to analyze the productivity improvement strategies of the agricultural sector based on the problems faced by the agricultural sector in Central Java, Indonesia. Design/methodology/approach The analysis is done through interviews, literature studies and analytical hierarchy process data processing aids. Findings The results show that the strategy for developing the agricultural sector in Central Java needs to be focused on institutional factors to organize the field agricultural sector institutions. The ideal institution for the development of the agricultural sector in Central Java is cooperatives that can be accompanied by the Islamic Microfinance Institutions (LKMS). Originality/value This paper will contribute new knowledge specifically about the productivity improvement strategy through the cooperative institution.
Technical Report
Full-text available
Chapter 4 of the Institute for Justice and Reconciliation Transformation Report 2016, Opportunity for change - The private sector’s role in inclusive development
Article
Full-text available
Irrigation reduces risks involved in agriculture and enables farming throughout the year. Improved irrigation systems enhance access to irrigation water. However, most smallholder farmers continue to use traditional irrigation schemes as if the difference in water use and crop yields between the two is insignificant. It seems essential to assess the paddy crop yield difference and its contribution to household incomes between traditional and semi-improved Farmer-Managed Irrigation Schemes (FMISs) in Iringa Rural and Kilombero districts in Tanzania. A cross-sectional research design was used in this study involving 48 key informants and 172 randomly selected households. Household survey using a structured questionnaire was the major method for data collection. Data from focus group discussions and key informants supplemented the information collected using household survey. The data were analyzed using Statistical Product and Service Solutions (SPSS). Results indicate that yield of paddy was higher in semi-improved schemes (2.5-3.6 tons/ha) compared to traditional irrigation schemes (2.2-2.9 tons/ha). This was attributed to the presence of improved water intake structures and existence of main canals, which facilitated an improved water supply to the irrigation fields. In spite of the poor and incomplete irrigation infrastructure, the paddy production contributed very significantly (73-80%) to the total annual household income of smallholder irrigators and somewhat more in the improved system than the traditional system. Other income sources are quite marginal in the study areas. The study recommends that the government should invest in irrigation infrastructure development to increase irrigation water use efficiency and increase agricultural values added.
Article
Full-text available
The livestock industries are a major contributor to the economy of the northeastern United States. Climate models predict increased average maximum temperatures, days with temperatures exceeding 25 °C, and higher annual precipitation in the Northeast. These environmental changes combined with increased atmospheric CO2 concentration are expected to either increase or decrease forage productivity depending on the crop, and may decrease protein content and forage digestibility. Winter damage to sensitive forage species may also increase. Predicted temperature increases are expected to reduce fertility in dairy cattle and heat stress-induced inflammation may limit energy available for productive functions. Additional loss in milk production due to decreased feed intake is estimated to be up to 1% of the projected annual milk production through 2100. The effects of climate change on the beef industry in the Northeast are expected to be minimal. Broiler production in the region may benefit from warmer winter and summer temperatures, but future housing will require greater insulation and ventilation fan capacity. Providing adequate housing and ventilation to offset climate changes will also be important for the layer industry and will likely increase the price of eggs. Climate change is expected to have an economic impact on the horse industry in the region through additional management of land and forage resources, building of shelters, and heat abatement at equine events. Increased temperatures and more intense storms will increase nutrient losses and gaseous emissions from animal manure. Uncertainties about how host animals, pathogens, and disease vectors will respond to climate change highlight the need for continued animal health monitoring.
Article
Full-text available
Irrigated agriculture is a key activity for the long-term survival of humanenvironmental systems and the assessment of agricultural sustainability has been gaining increasing relevance. In spite of several proposals developed, there is not a holistic approach that can be generally applied to assess sustainability of irrigated agricultural areas. In this paper we present a framework and associated indicators for the assessment of sustainability of irrigated agricultural systems in different contexts and locations. The framework covers four main sustainability dimensions: environmental integrity, economic resilience and profitability, social wellbeing and good governance. This approach was tested in 10 agricultural areas in eight different countries that represent a wide variety of situations in terms of agricultural development, environmental conditions, socio-economic settings and political contexts, but that share the fact that water use is a critical aspect for agricultural development. The obtained results illustrate the usefulness of the proposed framework to obtain a holistic picture of sustainability in irrigated agriculture areas, even in situations of poor data availability. It is also an excellent starting point for the construction of roadmaps towards more sustainable agricultural systems.
Article
Full-text available
Many small-scale irrigation systems are characterized by low yields and deteriorating infrastructure. Interventions often erroneously focus on increasing yields and rehabilitating infrastructure. Small-scale irrigation systems have many of the characteristics of complex socio-ecological systems, with many different actors and numerous interconnected subsystems. However, the limited interaction between the different subsystems and their agents prevents learning and the emergence of more beneficial outcomes. This article reports on using Agricultural Innovation Platforms to create an environment in which irrigation scheme actors can engage, experiment, learn and build adaptive capacity to increase market-related offtake and move out of poverty.
Article
Full-text available
Crop yields are vulnerable to climate change. We assess the global impacts of climate change on agricultural systems under two climate projections (RCP8.5 and RCP4.5) to quantify the difference in impacts if climate change were reduced. We also employ two different socioeconomic pathways (SSP3 and SSP5) to assess the sensitivity of results to the underlying socioeconomic conditions. The integrated-Population-Economy-Technology-Science (iPETS) model, a global integrated assessment model for projecting future energy use, land use and emissions, is used in conjunction with the Community Earth System Model (CESM), and particularly its land surface component, the Community Land Model (CLM), to evaluate climate change impacts on agriculture. iPETS results are produced at the level of nine world regions for the period 2005–2100. We employ climate impacts on crop yield derived from CLM, driven by CESM simulations of the two RCPs. These yield effects are applied within iPETS, imposed on baseline and mitigation scenarios for SSP3 and SSP5 that are consistent with the RCPs. We find that the reduced level of warming in RCP4.5 (relative to RCP8.5) can have either positive or negative effects on the economy since crop yield either increases or decreases with climate change depending on assumptions about CO2 fertilization. Yields are up to 12 % lower, and crop prices are up to 15 % higher, in RCP4.5 relative to RCP8.5 if CO2 fertilization is included, whereas yields are up to 22 % higher, and crop prices up to 22 % lower, if it is not. We also find that in the mitigation scenarios (RCP4.5), crop prices are substantially affected by mitigation actions as well as by climate impacts. For the scenarios we evaluated, the development pathway (SSP3 vs SSP5) has a larger impact on outcomes than climate (RCP4.5 vs RCP8.5), by a factor of 3 for crop prices, 11 for total cropland use, and 35 for GDP on global average.
Chapter
This chapter reviews structural transformation and its consequences for the welfare of rural households in Bangladesh. We argue that public investment in road, electricity, and financial institutions triggers structural transformation, which increases and diversifies rural income, raises consumption expenditure, reduces poverty, and increases educational achievements. Data analysis suggests that household income goes up by 10% and consumption expenditure by 4.7%, as a result of an increase of one microfinance institution (MFI) branch in a village. Grid connectivity and road investment also increase income and expenditure, and lower poverty. Analysis also shows that income increases more for non-farm sources than for farm sources as a result of infrastructural investment. These developments point to a structural transformation at play in rural Bangladesh.
Article
Food sovereignty has become a powerful concept to critique the dominant global food regime. Although it has not taken root in South Africa as fiercely as elsewhere, we use this concept to explore how one small-scale farmer seeks to wean herself from the dominant food system in the small town of Mtubatuba, KwaZulu-Natal. Using ethnographic methods and in-depth interviews about this single intense and extreme case, we explore this farmer's commitment and argue that it constitutes what we call the ‘lived experience of food sovereignty’. If food sovereignty is concerned with small-farmer control over decisions about food cultivation, distribution and consumption, we examine this farmer's praxis and explore the obstacles she faces. These include gendered and racialized agrarian questions, land struggles, social reproduction and perceptions of her indigenous crops. We also examine the networks, knowledge, systems and methods that have allowed her to cultivate her self-reliance.