ArticlePDF Available

Experimentally Inducing Disgust Reduces Desire for Short-Term Mating

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Short-term mating strategies involve casual sex, multiple partners, and short-time intervals before initiating intercourse. Such strategies should be difficult to implement in the presence of high levels of sexual disgust. Researchers have therefore suggested—and found evidence for—the hypothesis that individuals with a stronger proclivity for short-term mating have lower levels of sexual disgust. Here, we suggest a related hypothesis: inducing sexual disgust should reduce desire for short-term mating. Experiment 1 (N = 341) and experiment 2 (N = 361) investigated the effects of disgust induction on desire for short-term mating. Both studies found that inducing disgust reduces desire for short-term mating, and that the effect of sexual disgust is particularly strong. These results support the novel hypothesis advanced here and corroborate the broader hypothesis that reduced sexual disgust is a previously undiscovered design feature of short-term mating strategies.
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Experimentally Inducing Disgust Reduces Desire for Short-Term Mating
Laith Al-Shawaf
1
&David M. G. Lewis
2
&Maliki Eyvonne Ghossainy
3
&David M. Buss
4
#Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018
Abstract
Short-term mating strategies involve casual sex, multiple partners, and short-time intervals before initiating intercourse. Such
strategies should be difficult to implement in the presence of high levels of sexual disgust. Researchers have therefore
suggestedand found evidence forthe hypothesis that individuals with a stronger proclivity for short-term mating have lower
levels of sexual disgust. Here, we suggest a related hypothesis: inducing sexual disgust should reduce desire for short-term
mating. Experiment 1 (N= 341) and experiment 2 (N= 361) investigated the effects of disgust induction on desire for short-term
mating. Both studies found that inducing disgust reduces desire for short-term mating, and that the effect of sexual disgust is
particularly strong. These results support the novel hypothesis advanced here and corroborate the broader hypothesis that reduced
sexual disgust is a previously undiscovered design feature of short-term mating strategies.
Keywords Disgust .Emotions .Evolutionary psychology .Sexual disgust .Mating .Short-term mating
Introduction
The emotion of disgust and the psychology of human mating
have conceptual relevance for one another, but have largely
been studied in isolation. Recent research has begun to bridge
these two areas of inquiry (Al-Shawaf et al. 2015a,b,c; Borg
and de Jong 2012; Curtis, de Barra, & Aunger, 2011;
DeBruine et al. 2010; Jones et al. 2013;deJongetal,2009;
de Jong et al., 2010;deJongetal.,2013; Lee et al. 2014; Little
et al. 2011; Tybur and Gangestad 2011; Tybur et al. 2011).
Such work has found, for example, a bidirectional relationship
between disgust and sexual arousal. Sexual arousal can inhibit
disgust (e.g., Ariely and Loewenstein 2006), but disgust can
also inhibit sexual arousal (e.g., Fleischman et al. 2015). The
bidirectional nature of the relationship between disgust and
mating is important: mating is a crucial aspect of human life,
but disgust must be inhibited in order to facilitate successful
sexual congress. On the other hand, disgust mustbe capable of
inhibiting or shutting down sexual arousal in extreme circum-
stances, such as when cues to pathogens are powerful and
numerous, or when new information is discovered that renders
a potential mate unsuitable (e.g., he is abusive, she has a sex-
ually transmitted infection, he is a close-genetic relative).
Despite recent advances in disgust research and mating
research, much work remains in connecting these conceptual-
ly related domains. Recent research bridging the two has
found that individuals with a stronger proclivity for short-
term mating have lower levels of sexual disgust than their less
short-term-oriented counterparts (Al-Shawaf et al. 2015c).
Researchers predicted this finding based on a task analysis
of short-term mating strategies: because short-term mating
involves casual sex, multiple sex partners, and intercourse
after brief periods of acquaintance, implementing this strategy
would be difficult without a functional reduction in sexual
disgust levels. Two independent studies supported this hy-
pothesis (Al-Shawaf et al. 2015c), and these findings have
now been replicated by an independent group of researchers
using a large online sample (OShea et al. in press).
If low levels of sexual disgust are a key facilitator of short-
term mating strategies, then experimentally inducing sexual
disgust should reduce peoples desire for short-term mating.
This paper reports two experiments designed to test this
hypothesis.
*Laith Al-Shawaf
lalshawa@uccs.edu
1
Department of Psychology, University of Colorado, Colorado
Springs, USA
2
School of Psychology and Exercise Science, Murdoch University,
Perth, Australia
3
Department of Psychology, American University of Beirut,
Beirut, Lebanon
4
Department of Psychology, The University of Texas at Austin,
Austin, TX, USA
Evolutionary Psychological Science
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-018-0179-z
Different Forms of Disgustand Their Relevance
to Short-Term Mating
Recent research has identified three types of disgust: pathogen
disgust,sexual disgust,andmoral disgust (Tybur et al. 2009,
2012). These three types of disgust are distinguished by the
social and ecological inputs that activate them, the distinct
behavioral outputs that they motivate, and their unique pro-
files of correlations with other psychological variables.
Our reasoning specifically implicates sexual disgust as rel-
evant to short-term mating. Consistent with this, individuals
dispositionally inclined toward short-term mating exhibit low
levels of sexual disgust, but not pathogen or moral disgust (Al-
Shawaf et al. 2015c). Conceptually, however, pathogen dis-
gust is also relevant to short-term mating: an important cost of
short-term mating is increased risk of transmission of sexually
transmitted infections and other contagious diseases (National
Center for HIV/AIDS, viral hepatitis, STD, and TB
Prevention 2011). Some cuessuch as a nude human body
covered in sores or lesionsshould trigger both pathogen
disgust and sexual disgust.
Al-Shawaf and colleagues reasoned that the absence of a
relationship between pathogen disgust and short-term mating
might be an artifact of the nature of pathogen disgust mea-
sures. The pathogen disgust subscale of the Three-Domain
Disgust Scalearguably the most conceptually sound and
psychometrically valid disgust measure (Al-Shawaf and
Lewis 2013; Haidt et al. 1994; Tybur et al. 2009 for more
detail)appears to be constructed so as to index Bpure^path-
ogen disgust: pathogen disgust that does not overlap with
measures of other forms of disgust. Developing an instrument
with conceptually distinct subscales for pathogen and sexual
disgust entails excluding items that simultaneously tap both
types of disgust. Although sexual and pathogen disgust have
some non-overlapping domains (e.g., rotting meat might in-
duce pathogen disgust but not sexual disgust, incest might
induce sexual disgust but not pathogen disgust), sexual con-
tact is a key pathogen-transmission vector. This importance of
sexual contact as a pathogen vector renders the two domains
inherently linkeda linkage not fully captured by the design
of the extant three-factor measure of disgust.
We predicted that a more naturalistic investigation of path-
ogen disgustor an investigation that does not limit itself to
Bpure^pathogen cueswould find a relationship between
pathogen disgust and short-term mating. We expect images
of diseased human bodies, for example, to trigger pathogen
disgust and sexual disgust because of the infection risks inher-
ent in sexual contact.
In the current experiments, we do not limit ourselves to
Bpure^pathogen cues, and so we expect that inducing patho-
gen disgust will have an effect on short-term mating desire.
However, because only a limited subset of pathogen cues
should be relevant to short-term mating (e.g., diseased bodies,
but not rodents or rotting food), we predicted that the effect of
pathogen disgust on short-term mating desire would be weak-
er than the effect of sexual disgust.
Experiment 1: the Effect of Disgust Induction
on Short-Term Mating
Experiment 1 aimed to determine the impact of experimental-
ly induced disgust on desire for short-term mating. We includ-
ed four experimental conditions: sexual disgust, pathogen dis-
gust, a neutral control condition, and a threatening control. We
did not have any hypotheses about the threatening control
group; we included it to permit discrimination between the
effects of negative emotion induction in general and disgust
induction specifically.
Method
Participants
Three hundred fifty two participants (179 men, 162 women;
M
age
= 19.21, SD
age
= 1.44, age range: 1828 years) were
recruited from the psychology subject pool at The
University of Texas at Austin to participate in a study about
Bdisgust and human mating^. Sample size was determined
before any data analysis. Participant breakdown by experi-
mental condition was as follows: sexual disgust: 86 (40
males), pathogen disgust: 87 (45 males), neutral control: 82
(45 males), and threatening control: 86 (49 males).
Participants arrived at the laboratory, provided informed con-
sent to participate in the study, and were escorted by a re-
searcher to a private room where they completed the experi-
ment. Participants received partial course credit for their par-
ticipation and were debriefed upon completion.
Design
Experiment 1 was a 2 × 4 mixed-design ANOVA with one
within-subjects factor (interest in short-term mating: pre- and
post-manipulation) and one between-subjects factor (experi-
mental condition: sexual disgust, pathogen disgust, neutral
control, and threatening control).
The experimental manipulation differed for each group: the
sexual disgust group looked at a set of 20 images that included
nude elderly individuals, genitalia exhibiting cues to sexually
transmitted disease, and similar sexual disgust stimuli; all ob-
tained from the web. Participants in this group were also
instructed to Bplease imagine what it would be like to be in a
sexually intimate situation with the person depicted in this
picture^. These instructions served to make the sexual aspect
of the situation more salient, thereby making it more likely
that participantsprimary reaction would be sexual disgust
Evolutionary Psychological Science
rather than pathogen or moral disgust. The pathogen disgust
group viewed a series of 20 images designed to induce disgust
associated with pathogen vectors, including diseased human
bodies, rotting food items, rodents, and feces. The threatening
control group viewed a series of 20 images of men in menac-
ing poses, pointing guns directly at the screen (adapted from
Schaller et al. 2010). Participants viewed the slides for as long
as they chose to: they had to click Bnext^to proceed to the
next image. This was to prevent participants from simply
closing their eyes and allowing the slideshow to finish without
having viewed the stimuli. The neutral control group did not
undergo any experimental manipulation.
Participants in each group completed a measure of interest
in short-term mating both prior to and after exposure to the
respective experimental stimuli. Finally, participants
responded to items designed to assess current disgust levels,
as well as other instruments as part of a broader study. The
order of materials was as follows: pre-measure of short-term
mating desire, experimental disgust induction, measure of cur-
rent disgust, post-measure of short-term mating desire, Three-
Domain Disgust Scale, and finally demographic questions.
All stimuli are available upon request from the first author.
Materials
Current Interest in Short-Term Mating Because we were inter-
ested in current short-term mating desireas opposed to dis-
positional orientation toward short-term matingthe standard
sociosexual orientation inventory (SOI-R, Penke and
Asendorpf 2008)wouldnothavebeenanappropriatemea-
sure. Accordingly, we designed a four-item scale to index
current interest in short-term mating. This scale consisted of
the following items, which were evaluated on a Likert-type
scale: BHow hard would it be for you to experience a sexual
fantasy right now?^(reverse coded), BRight now, how com-
fortable would you be having sex with somebody that you just
met?^,BIf you went on a first date with somebody tonight,
how willing do you think you would be to have sex with him
or her on the first date?^, and BHow desirable [as a mate]
would someone have to be in order for you to have sex with
that person on the first date?^(reverse coded). Participants
completed this scale before and after the experimental disgust
manipulation.
Current Disgust We included an author-generated measure of
current, state-level disgust to assess the effectiveness of our
manipulation. We reasoned that our brief disgust induction
would affect current disgust levels, but not the stable, dispo-
sitional disgust sensitivity measured by the Three-Domain
Disgust Scale. We therefore generated two items intended to
serve as a brief, face-valid method of capturing current dis-
gust. These two items were BHow disgusting did you find the
series of images you just saw?^and BHow disgusted do you
feel right now?^
Results
Manipulation Check
We tested the efficacy of our disgust induction procedure
by comparing the post-manipulation disgust levels across
condition, excluding participants in the neutral control
condition, who did not view any images. A one-way
ANOVA confirmed that there were significant differences
in disgust levels across conditions, F(2, 254) = 124.49,
p< .001, partial η
2
= .50. Disgust means and standard
deviations for each experimental condition were as fol-
lows: sexual 13.27 (SD = 1.76), pathogen 10.58 (SD =
2.93), and threatening control 6.47 (SD = 3.56), Post-
hoc tests revealed significant differences in disgust be-
tween all three groups. The sexual disgust group exhibit-
ed the highest levels of disgustsignificantly higher than
the pathogen disgust group (difference between means =
2.69, SE = .37, p< .001) and the threatening control
group (difference between means = 6.80, SE = .43,
p< .001). Additionally, the pathogen disgust group ex-
hibited significantly higher disgust than the threatening
control group (difference between means = 4.11,
SE = .50, p< .001).
Descriptive Statistics
Tab le 1presents means and standard deviations for the three
disgust scales (Cronbachsα: moral = .88, sexual = .88, path-
ogen = .82) and the scale measuring current desire for short-
term mating (pre-manipulation α= .71, post-manipulation
α=.73).
Sex differences in disgust followed a similar pattern to
those reported by Tybur et al. (2009,2011). Consistent with
previous research, women exhibited higher levels of sexual
disgust [t(333) = 12.87, p<.001,d= 1.40], pathogen disgust
[t(332) = 4.40, p< .001, d= 0.48], and moral disgust
[t(333) = 2.62, p<.01,d= 0.29] than did men. These find-
ings replicate the reliable sex difference demonstrated inmuch
of the disgust literature over the last several decades: women
exhibit significantly higher levels of disgust than do men (see
Al-Shawaf et al. 2018 for a review and novel hypotheses).
Similarly, sex differences in desire for short-term
mating [pre-disgust-induction: t(301) = 13.07, p< .001,
d= 1.4; post-disgust-induction: t(286) = 13.31,
p< .001, d= 1.43] corroborated the robust and well-
replicated finding that short-term mating looms larger
in mens psychology than in womens(Buss2015;
Buss and Schmitt 1993; Lippa 2009).
Evolutionary Psychological Science
Interaction: Disgust Manipulation * Experimental Condition
We conducted a mixed-model ANOVA with one within-
subjects factor (interest in short-term mating: pre- and post-
manipulation) and one between-subjects factor (experimental
condition) in order to assess the effect of the disgust manipu-
lation on desire for short-term mating and to determine wheth-
er this effect differed according to experimental condition.
There was a statistically significant disgust manipulation ×
experimental condition interaction on short-term mating de-
sire, F(3, 332) = 19.47, p< .001, partial η
2
= .15, indicating
that there were differential effects of the disgust manipulation
across conditions.
Simple Effects of Disgust Manipulation
Before analyzing the simple effects of the disgust manipula-
tion across experimental condition, we checked for sex differ-
ences in the extent to which the disgust manipulation affected
desire for short-term mating. There were no sex differences in
change in desire for short-term mating in any of the experi-
mental conditions (all ps > .05), so we collapsed across sex.
Because our primary hypothesis was that inducing disgust
particularly sexual disgust leads to a decrease in desire for
short-term mating, we began by analyzing the simple effects of
the experimental manipulations. As expected, participants ex-
posed to the sexual disgust stimuli exhibited a significant reduc-
tion in desire for short-term mating, F(1, 85) = 79.24, p< .001,
partial η
2
= .48. The participants in the pathogen disgust condi-
tion also exhibited a reduction in short-term mating desire: F(1,
85) = 24.51, p< .001, partial η
2
= .22. The threatening control
group also experienced a dip in desire for short-term mating,
F(1, 82) = 9.72, p< .01, partial η
2
= .11. As expected, there was
no change in desire for short-term mating in the neutral control
group, F(1, 80) = .86, p= .36, partial η
2
=.01.
In order to test the magnitude of the reduction across
conditions, we computed a pre-post manipulation differ-
ence score for each experimental condition. A one-way
ANOVA indicated that, as predicted, there was a signif-
icant difference in the magnitude of the reduction in
short-term mating desire across conditions, F(3, 332) =
19.47, p< .001, partial η
2
= .15. Post-hoc tests revealed
that individuals in the sexual disgust condition experi-
enced the greatest reduction in short-term mating desire
(all post-hoc tests reported in this manuscript are Tukey
HSDs). This decline was greater than that in the patho-
gen disgust condition (difference between means = 1.81,
SE = .49, p= .001, the threatening control condition
(difference between means = 2.51, SE = .47, p< .001),
and the neutral control condition (difference between
means = 3.14, SE = .45, p<.001; see Fig. 1).
Simple Effects of Experimental Condition
Prior to the manipulation, there were no differences between
conditions in desire for short-term mating, F(3, 341) = .87, ns,
partial η
2
= .01. After the manipulation, there was a significant
difference between groups in desire for short-term mating,
F(3, 333) = 10.06, p< .001, partial η
2
= .08. Post-hoc tests
revealed that the sexual disgust group had the lowest desire
for short-term matinglower than the pathogen disgust group
(difference between means = 2.04, SE = .71, p<.05), the
threatening control group (difference between means = 3.61,
SE = .76, p< .01), and the neutral control group (difference
betweenmeans=3.87,SE=.79,p< .01). There were no other
post-manipulationbetween-group differences in short-term
mating desire (all ps > .05).
Table 1 Means, standard
deviations, and effect sizes for the
sex differences in experiment 1
Disgust subscale (TDDS) Men mean (SD) Women mean (SD) Cohensd
Sexual 24.60 (9.51) 37.04 (8.20) 1.40
Moral 31.51 (9.71) 34.18 (8.97) .29
Pathogen 32.82 (8.19) 36.53 (7.17) .48
Current desire for short-term mating
Pre-disgust induction 14.78 (5.33) 8.57 (3.30) 1.39
Post-disgust induction 13.23 (5.32) 7.02 (3.05) 1.41
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
Control Group Threatening Control Pathogen Disgust Sexual Disgust
Experimental condition
Change in short-term mating desire
Experiment 1: Change in short-term mating desire across conditions
Fig. 1 Change in desire for short-term mating across conditions in ex-
periment 1. The sexual disgust condition experienced the greatest reduc-
tion in desire for short-term mating. Bars represent pre-post manipulation
difference scores and error bars represent 95% confidence intervals
Evolutionary Psychological Science
Discussion
The results of experiment 1 support the central hypothesis that
inducing sexual disgust reduces short-term mating desire. By
including both pre- and post-measures of short-term mating de-
sire, we were able to directly measure change in desire for short-
term mating as a consequence of disgust induction. This analysis
revealed several findings that support the primary hypothesis of
this study: a) the groups did not differ in their desire for short-
term mating before the manipulation, but did differ after the
manipulation, b) the sexual disgust group showed the strongest
decline in desire for short-term mating, c) the neutral control
group showed no change in desire for short-term mating, and
d) post-hoc tests revealed that after disgust induction, the sexual
disgust group exhibited lower desire for short-term mating than
all three other groups, and none of the other groups differed in
their desire for short-term mating. It is interesting to note both the
power of sexual disgust to reduce short-term mating desire, as
well as the finding that pathogen disgust primes and threatening
primes also have an impact on short-term mating desire. This
suggests that inducing other negative emotionsperhaps those
that signal pressing adaptive problemscanalsohaveaneffect
on short-term mating desire, but that the effect of sexual disgust is
especially powerful.
Experiment 2: the Effect of Different Modes
of Disgust Induction on Desire for Short-Term
Mating
We sought to replicate this central finding in an independent
study with a new sample, different experimental conditions in-
volving additional perceptual modalities, and novel stimuli. We
conducted a second study in which we included five experimen-
tal conditions: visual sexual disgust, visual pathogen disgust,
olfactory pathogen disgust, text-based pathogen disgust, and a
threatening control. Our central hypothesis was the same as that
of experiment 1: inducing disgustespecially sexual disgust
should cause a decline in desire for short-term mating.
Method
Participants
Three hundred fifty participants (153 men, 194 women, 3
unreported; M
age
=18.83, SD
age
= 1.16, age range: 17
26 years) were recruited from the psychology subject pool at
The University of Texas at Austin. Sample size was deter-
mined before any data analysis. No participants from experi-
ment 1 participated in experiment 2. Participants arrived at the
laboratory, provided informed consent to participate in the
study, and were escorted by a researcher to a private room
where they completed the experiment. Participants received
partial course credit for their participation and were debriefed
upon completion.
Design
Similar to experiment 1, experiment 2 was a 2 × 5 mixed-
design ANOVA with one within-subjects factor (interest in
short-term mating: pre- and post-manipulation) and one
between-subjects factor (experimental condition: visual sexu-
al, visual pathogen, olfactory pathogen, text-based pathogen,
and threatening control).
Participant breakdown by experimental condition was as
follows: sexual 69 (34 males), pathogen 67 (24 males), olfac-
tory 67 (30 males), text-based 65 (36 males), and threatening
control 70 (25 males).
The two new conditions in this experiment were the text-
based pathogen condition and the olfactory pathogen condi-
tion. The text-based group read a popular internet story about
parasitic invertebrate infection whose text was modified for
this experiment in order to induce pathogen disgust. We in-
duced pathogen disgust in the olfactory group with the use of
Liquid ASS®(Liquid ASSets Novelties, LLC, USA), a spray
that mimics the odor of putrid feces. As in experiment 1,
participants completed the same scale measuring desire for
short-term mating, underwent the disgust manipulation, com-
pleted the short-term mating scale again, and finally complet-
ed the instrument designed to assess current disgust.
We retained the threatening control because the threatening
control group in experiment 1 experienced a dip in desire for
short-term mating. If we wish to establish that inducing dis-
gust causes a significant decline in desire for short-term mat-
ing over and above aversive states in general, then the more
appropriate and more conservative control condition is that of
the threatening prime.
The disgust induction procedure was somewhat different in
the olfactory pathogen condition. In this condition, at the same
point in the survey at which the manipulations were intro-
duced into the other conditions, the survey prompted the par-
ticipant to step outside of the private laboratory room and call
the experimenter. The experimenter then entered the partici-
pants room with a rag that had been sprayed twice in the same
spot with Liquid ASS®. The experimenter held out the rag
and asked participants to take two deep breaths with their nose
in the spot where the smell had been sprayed. When this
procedure was completed, the experimenter stepped out of
the room again, permitting the participant to complete the
experiment in privacy.
Materials
Participants completed the same instruments as in experiment
1, including the short-term mating scale and the measure of
current disgust.
Evolutionary Psychological Science
Results
Manipulation Check
As in experiment 1, we tested the efficacy of our disgust ma-
nipulation by comparing the post-manipulation disgust levels
of our five groups. Disgust means and standard deviations for
each experimental condition were as follows: sexual 11.539
(SD = 3.14), pathogen 11.82 (SD = 2.87), olfactory 10.81
(SD = 3.64), text-based 10.81 (SD = 3.64), and threatening
control 10.92 (SD = 3.48). A one-way ANOVA confirmed
that disgust levels did not differ significantly between condi-
tions, F(4, 333) = 1.22, p=.30, partial η
2
=.014.
Descriptive Statistics
Tab le 2presents experiment 2 means and standard deviations
for the three disgust scales (Cronbachsα:moral=.89,sexu-
al = .88, pathogen = .79) and the researcher-generated scale
indexing current desire for short-term mating (pre-manipula-
tion α= .71, post-manipulation α=.70).
Sex differences in disgust were consistent with experiment
1 and with previous research. Women in the current study
exhibited stronger sexual disgust [t(328) = 12.83, p<.001,
d= 1.41] and pathogen disgust [t(290) = 7.81, p< .001,
d= .87]. The sex difference in moral disgust, though in the
expected direction, did not reach significance [t(301) = 1.53,
p=.1, d= .17]. As in experiment 1, sex differences in desire
for short-term mating [pre-disgust-induction t(266) = 12.30,
p< .001, d= 1.36; post-disgust-induction t(260) = 10.51,
p< .001, d= 1.16] again corroborated the well-established
finding that men are more inclined toward short-term mating
than are women (Schmitt 2003).
Interaction: Disgust Manipulation * Experimental Condition
As in experiment 1, we conducted a mixed analysis of variance
(ANOVA) with one within-subjects factor (interest in short-
term mating: pre- and post-manipulation) and one between-
subjects factor (experimental condition) in order to assess the
effect of the disgust manipulation on desire for short-term
mating and to determine whether this effect differed by exper-
imental condition. As in experiment 1, there was a significant
interaction between experimental condition and the disgust
manipulation, F(4, 347) = 6.73, p< .001, partial η
2
= .07, indi-
cating that the effect of the manipulation differed across
conditions.
Simple Effect of the Disgust Manipulation
To unpack this significant interaction, we again analyzed the
simple effects of disgust manipulation and experimental con-
dition separately. As in experiment 1, these effects did not
differ by sex, so we provide the results of these tests for men
and women together.
Because our primary hypothesis was that inducing disgust
especially sexual disgustshould lead to a decrease in desire for
short-term mating, we began with the simple effects of the dis-
gust manipulations. As in experiment 1, there was a significant
decline in desire for short-term mating in the sexual disgust
group, F(1, 69) = 63.16, p< .001, partial η
2
= .48, and in the
visual pathogen group, F(1, 69) = 16.73, p< .001, partial
η
2
= .20. The olfactory and text-based disgust groups also exhib-
ited declines in short-term mating desire [olfactory F(1,70) =
23.86, p< .001, partial η
2
=.25, text-based F(1, 69) = 26.22,
p< .001, partial η
2
= .28]. The threatening control group, on
the other hand, showed no change in desire for short-term mat-
ing, F(1,70) = 2.81, ns,partialη
2
=.04.
In order to test the magnitude of the reduction in short-term
mating desire across condition, we computed a pre-post ma-
nipulation difference score for each experimental condition. A
one-way ANOVA indicated that, as predictedand replicat-
ing the findings of experiment 1there was a significant dif-
ference in the magnitude of the reduction in short-term mating
desire across conditions, F(4, 347) = 6.73, p< .001, partial
η
2
= .07. Post-hoc tests revealed that individuals in the sexual
disgust condition experienced a greater reduction in short-
term mating desire than those in the visual pathogen disgust
condition (difference between means = 1.81, SE = .55,
p= .011), the text-based pathogen condition (difference be-
tween means = 1.56, SE = .55, p< .05), and the threatening
control condition (difference between means = 2.79,
SE = .55, p< .001) (Fig. 2).
Table 2 Means, standard
deviations, and effect sizes for the
sex differences in experiment 2
Disgust subscale (TDDS) Men mean (SD) Women mean (SD) Cohensd
Sexual 22.50 (8.52) 34.94 (9.09) 1.41
Moral 29.52 (10.23) 31.15 (9.01) .17
Pathogen 30.97 (7.25) 36.94 (6.40) .87
Current desire for short-term mating
Pre-disgust induction 15.08 (5.04) 9.09 (3.65) 1.36
Post-disgust induction 12.76 (5.28) 7.49 (3.73) 1.16
Evolutionary Psychological Science
Simple Effects of Experimental Condition
We followed this with an analysis of the simple effect of con-
dition. As in experiment 1, there were no differences between
groups in desire for short-term mating before the onset of the
manipulation, F(4, 351) = 1.91, ns, partial η
2
= .02. After the
manipulation, howeverand replicating the findings of ex-
periment 1the groups differed in desire for short-term mat-
ing, F(4, 351) = 3.38, p=.01, partialη
2
= .04. Post-hoc tests
revealed that the sexual disgust group had the lowest desire for
short-term matinglower than the threatening control group
[difference between means = 2.34, SE = .80, p= .03] and the
olfactory group [difference between means = 2.82, SE = .85,
p= .01]. There were no other between-group differences in
desire for short-term mating (all ps > .05).
Discussion
The results of experiment 2 cleanly replicate those of experi-
ment 1, providing empirical support for the hypothesis that
inducing disgustespecially sexual disgustleads to a de-
cline in desire for short-term mating. This is especially inter-
esting given that the manipulation check revealed only non-
significant differences in disgust between groups. As in ex-
periment 1, the central findings in experiment 2 provide sev-
eral pieces of evidence in support of our primary hypothesis:
a) the five groups did not differ in their desire for short-term
mating before the manipulation, but did differ after the manip-
ulation, b) the sexual disgust group showed the strongest de-
cline in desire for short-term mating (significantly stronger
than the visual pathogen group, the text-based group, and
the threatening control group), c) the threatening control
group showed no change in desire for short-term mating,
and d) post-hoc tests revealed that after disgust induction,
the sexual disgust group exhibited lower desire for short-
term mating than the threatening control group and the
olfactory disgust group. These results support our primary
hypothesis and show that the results of experiment 1 replicate
robustly across independent samples with modified methods.
General Discussion
The logic underlying our central hypothesis comes from a task
analysis of short-term mating strategies. Since short-term mating
involves casual sex, sex with multiple partners, and sex after brief
periods of acquaintance, those with a strong proclivity for short-
term mating may be less able to implement their preferred mating
strategy in the presence of high levels of sexual disgust. This
reasoning suggests the hypothesis that short-term mating mech-
anisms calibrate sexual disgust levels in order to facilitate the
implementation of those strategies (Al-Shawaf et al. 2015c).
This broad hypothesis gives rise to two specific hypotheses.
The first is that individuals oriented toward short-term mating
should have lower levels of sexual disgust than their less short-
term-oriented counterparts. We have found empirical support for
this hypothesis in two independent studies (Al-Shawaf et al.
2015c). The second hypothesis is the one we advance in this
paper: because low sexual disgust is an important component
of short-term mating strategies, experimentally inducing sexual
disgust should cause a decline in desire for short-term mating.
In both studies, inducing disgust caused a decline in desire
for short-term mating, and this decrease was most pronounced
for those in the sexual disgust group. This suggests that ex-
perimentally inducing disgust has the capacity to inhibit short-
term mating, and that the inhibitory effect of sexual disgust is
particularly strong. In both studies, our groups did not differ in
desire for short-term mating before the disgust manipulation,
but did differ after it, providing 1) evidence for the efficacy of
our disgust induction procedures and 2) evidence that the
findings presented here are not artifacts of baseline differences
between groups in their desire for short-term mating. Together
with the finding that individuals with a stronger proclivity for
short-term mating have lower levels of sexual disgust (Al-
Shawaf et al. 2015c), the current results bolster the hypothesis
that reduced levels of sexual disgust constitute an important
but previously undiscovered design feature of short-term mat-
ing strategies.
Limitations and Future Directions
Our use of experimental methodologyand especially of a
repeated-measures designenables us to make causal infer-
ences about the impact of sexual disgust on short-term mating
desire. Nonetheless, providing convergent evidence using
new stimuli, different methodologies, and novel samples
would buttress support for the hypothesis presented here and
enhance our confidence in the veridicality of our findings.
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
Threatening
Control
Visual
Pathogen Disgust
Text-based
Pathogen Disgust
Olfactory
Pathogen Disgust
Sexual
Disgust
Experimental condition
Change in short-term mating desire
Experiment 2: Change in short-term mating desire across conditions
Fig. 2 Change in desire forshort-term mating across conditions in exper-
iment 2. The sexual disgust condition experienced a greater decline in
desire for short-term mating than the visual pathogen disgust condition,
text-based pathogen disgust condition, and threatening control condition.
Bars represent pre-post manipulation difference scores and error bars
represent 95% confidence intervals
Evolutionary Psychological Science
Our methodology presents two potential limitations. First, in
experiment 1, the neutral control group was not exposed to any
slideshow. An alternative would be to present a neutral
slideshow, as in Mortensen et al. (2010). In this way, the differ-
ence between the neutral condition and other conditions would
be isolated to the content of the slideshow. Second, in experiment
2, our induction of olfactory pathogen disgust required an exper-
imenter to enter the room, a feature that was not present in the
other experimental conditions. Although we think it implausible
that it was the entry of the experimenter rather than the rag with
the offensive odor that was responsible for inducing disgust, a
future design that enables the presentation of the offensive odor
without the presence of the experimenter would be ideal.
The experiments presented are necessarily tied to the way
we operationalized our constructs. It remains to be seen, for
example, whether future experiments will yield the same pat-
tern of results if we employ different images in the pathogen
and sexual conditions, different odors in the olfactory condi-
tion, or different stories in the text-based condition.
Conducting numerous experiments with varying stimuli is a
good way to detect systematic patterns in the results: if differ-
ent stimulus sets reliably reveal similar patterns as the ones we
report here, that points to the robustness and generalizability
of the phenomenon and constitutes good evidence for the
hypothesis under investigation.
An important next step will be to examine the cross-
cultural universality of this phenomenon, as we expect the
relationship between short-term mating strategies and disgust
to be universal. The behavioral outputs, facial displays, and
other outward expressions may vary across individuals and
cultures, but we expect uniformity in the underlying psycho-
logical mechanisms responsible for short-term mating and its
relationship to sexual disgust. Cross-cultural tests also afford
the opportunity to examine variables such as prevalence of
sexually transmitted infections and local pathogen density,
and assess their hypothesized impact on disgust and mating
strategy (see Schaller and Murray 2008).
The hypothesis that short-term mating is partly responsible
for calibrating sexual disgust also points toward a longitudinal
test. Humans have been hypothesized to experience shifts
in mating strategy as a function of contextual or organis-
mic conditions such as operational sex ratio, longitudinal
changes in mate value, as well as life events such as
entering a new romantic relationship, having a child, or
emerging from a break-up (e.g., Burnham et al. 2003;
Buss and Greiling 1999; Gettler et al. 2011;Mazurand
Michalek 1998;McIntyreetal.2006;Schmitt2005). A
valuable test would be to investigate whether these shifts
in mating strategy are accompanied by concomitant shifts
in sexual disgust. For instance, having offspring may up-
regulate sexual disgust, andemergingfromabreak-up
may downregulate sexual disgust to facilitate a persons
re-entry into the mating market.
Another important future direction involves priming partici-
pants with mating mindsets. If low levels of sexual disgust are
needed to facilitate a short-term mating strategy, then successful-
ly priming a short-term mating mindset may cause a temporary
downregulation of sexual disgust (see Ariely and Loewenstein
2006; Borg and de Jong 2012; Stevenson et al. 2011).
A final limitation involves the self-report nature of our mea-
sure of short-term mating interest. Although studies show that
self-report measures predict behavioral measures fairly well
(Glasman and Albarracin 2006), future studies would benefit
from including behavioral, endocrinological, and psychophysio-
logical measures. Convergent evidence from multiple data
sources is always more compelling, and paints a more compre-
hensive picture.
Conclusions
The findings presented here support the hypothesis that experi-
mentally inducing sexual disgust causes a reduction in desire for
short-term matingan effect found for both men and women.
These findings provide corroborative experimental support for
the broader hypothesis that low levels of sexual disgust facilitate
the implementation of short-term mating strategies. Evidence is
now accumulatingfrom experimental and non-experimental
studies using a variety of different types of stimuli and disgust
induction proceduresthat reduced levels of sexual disgust are
an important, previously undiscovered design feature of short-
term mating strategies (Al-Shawaf et al. 2015c). This growing
body of evidence illuminates specialized design features of the
psychology of short-term mating and reveals an important link
between human mating and the emotion of disgust.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author
states that there is no conflict of interest.
PublishersNote Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to juris-
dictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
Al-Shawaf, L., & Lewis, D. M. (2013). Exposed intestines and contam-
inated cooks: Sex, stress, & satiation predict disgust sensitivity.
Personality and Individual Differences,54(6),698702.
Al-Shawaf, L., Conroy-Beam, D., Asao, K., & Buss, D. M. (2015a).
Human emotions: An evolutionary psychological perspective.
Emotion Review, 8,173186. https://doi.org/10.1177/
1754073914565518.
Al-Shawaf, L., Lewis, D. M. G., Alley, T. R., & Buss, D. M. (2015b).
Mating strategy, disgust, and food neophobia. Appetite, 85,3035.
Al-Shawaf, L., Lewis, D. M. G., & Buss, D. M. (2015c). Disgust and
mating strategy. Evolution and Human Behavior, 36(3), 199205.
Evolutionary Psychological Science
Al-Shawaf, L., Lewis, D. M., & Buss, D. M. (2018). Sex differences in
disgust: Why are women more easily disgusted than men? Emotion
Review, 10(2), 149160.
Ariely, D., & Loewenstein, G. (2006). The heat of the moment: the effect
of sexual arousal on sexual decision making. Journal of Behavioral
Decision Making, 19(2), 8798.
Borg, C., & de Jong, P. J. (2012). Feelings of disgust and disgust-induced
avoidance weaken following induced sexual arousal in women. PLoS
One, 7(9), e44111. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0044111.
Burnham, T. C., Chapman, J. F., Gray, P. B., McIntyre, M. H., Lipson, S.
F., & Ellison, P. T. (2003). Men in committed, romantic relationships
have lower testosterone. Hormones and Behavior, 44(2), 119122.
Buss, D. M. (2015). Evolutionary psychology: the new science of the
mind, 5th Edition. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: an evo-
lutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review,
100(2), 204232.
Buss, D. M., & Greiling, H. (1999). Adaptive individual differences.
Journal of Personality, 67(2), 209243.
Curtis, V. A., Aunger, R., & Rabie, T. (2004). Evidence that disgust
evolved to protect from risk of disease. Proceedings of the Royal
Society B: Biological Sciences, 271, 131133. https://doi.org/10.
1098/rsbl.2003.0144.
Curtis, V., De Barra, M., & Aunger, R. (2011). Disgust as an adaptive
system for disease avoidance behaviour. Philosophical Transactions
of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 366(1563),
389401.
DeBruine,L.M.,Jones,B.C.,Tybur,J.M.,Lieberman,D.,&
Griskevicius, V. (2010). Womens preferences for masculinity in
male faces are predicted by pathogen disgust, but not by moral or
sexual disgust. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31(1), 6974.
de Jong, P. J., van Overveld, M., Schultz, W. W., Peters, M. L., &
Buwalda, F. M. (2009). Disgust and contamination sensitivity in
vaginismus and dyspareunia. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38(2),
244252.
de Jong, P. J., van Lankveld, J., Elgersma, H. J., & Borg, C. (2010).
Disgust and sexual problemsTheoretical conceptualization and
case illustrations. International Journal of Cognitive Therapy,
3(1), 2339.
de Jong, P. J., van Overveld, M., & Borg, C. (2013). Giving in to arousal
or staying stuck in disgust? Disgust-based mechanisms in sex and
sexual dysfunction. Journal of Sex Research, 50(34), 247262.
Fessler, D. M., Pillsworth, E. G., & Flamson, T. J. (2004). Angry men and
disgusted women: an evolutionary approach to the influence of emo-
tionsonrisktaking.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision
Processes, 95(1), 107123.
Fleischman, D. S., Hamilton, L. D., Fessler, D. M., & Meston, C. M.
(2015). Disgust versus lust: exploring the interactions of disgust and
fear with sexual arousal in women. PLoS One, 10(6), e0118151.
Gettler, L. T., McDade, T. W., Feranil, A. B., & Kuzawa, C. W. (2011).
Longitudinal evidence that fatherhood decreases testosterone in hu-
man males. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,
108(39), 1619416199.
Glasman, L. R., & Albarracin, D. (2006). Forming attitudes that predict
future behavior: a meta-analysis of the attitude-behavior relation.
Psychological Bulletin, 132(5), 778822.
Haidt, J., McCauley, C., & Rozin, P. (1994). Individual differences in
sensitivity to disgust: a scale sampling seven domains of disgust
elicitors. Personality and Individual Differences, 16(5), 701713.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(94)90212-7.
Jones, B. C.,Feinberg, D.R., Watkins, C. D., Fincher, C. L., Little, A. C.,
& DeBruine, L. M. (2013). Pathogen disgust predicts womenspref-
erences for masculinity in mens voices, faces, and bodies.
Behavioral Ecology, 24(2), 373379.
Lee, A. J., Dubbs, S. L., Von Hippel, W., Brooks, R. C., & Zietsch, B. P.
(2014). A multivariate approach to human mate preferences.
Evolution and Human Behavior, 35(3), 193203.
Lippa, R. A. (2009). Sex differences in sex drive, sociosexuality, and
height across 53 nations: testing evolutionary and social structural
theories. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38,631651.
Little, A. C., DeBruine, L. M., & Jones, B. C. (2011). Exposure to visual
cues of pathogen contagion changes preferences for masculinity and
symmetry in opposite-sex faces. Proceedings of the Royal Society of
London B: Biological Sciences, 278(1714), 20322039.
Mazur, A., & Michalek, J. (1998). Marriage, divorce, and male testoster-
one. Social Forces, 77(1), 315330.
McIntyre, M., Gangestad, S. W., Gray, P. B., Chapman, J. F., Burnham, T.
C., O'Rourke, M. T., & Thornhill, R. (2006). Romantic involvement
often reduces mens testosterone levelsbut not always: the moder-
ating role of extrapair sexual interest. Journal of Personality and
Social Psychology, 91(4), 642651.
Mortensen, C. R., Becker, D. V., Ackerman, J. M., Neuberg, S. L., &
Kenrick, D. T. (2010). Infection breeds reticence: the effects of dis-
ease salience on self-perceptions of personality and behavioral
avoidance tendencies. Psychological Science, 21(3), 440447.
National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention
(2011). 10 ways STDs impact women differently from men. Atlanta,
GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
OShea, K.J., DeBruine, L.M., & Jones, B.C. (in press). Further evidence
for associations between short-term mating strategy and sexual dis-
gust. Personality and Individual Differences.
Penke, L., & Asendorpf, J. B. (2008). Beyond global sociosexual orien-
tations: a more differentiated look at sociosexuality and its effects on
courtship and romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and
Social Psychology, 95(5), 11131135.
Pliner, P., & Hobden, K. (1992). Development of a scale to measure the
trait of food neophobia in humans. Appetite, 19,105120.
Schaller, M., Miller, G. E., Gervais, W. M., Yager, S., & Chen, E. (2010).
Mere visual perception of other peoples disease symptoms facili-
tates a more aggressive immune response. Psychological Science,
21,649652. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610368064.
Schaller, M., & Murray, D. R. (2008). Pathogens, personality, and culture:
disease prevalence predicts worldwide variability in sociosexuality,
extraversion, and openness to experience. Journal of Personality
and Social Psychology, 95(1), 212221.
Schmitt, D. P. (2005). Sociosexuality from Argentina toZimbabwe: A 48-
nation study of sex, culture, and strategies of human mating.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28(02), 247275.
Schmitt, D. P. (2003). Universal sex differences in the desire for sexual
variety: tests from 52 nations, 6 continents, and 13 islands. Journal
of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(1), 85104.
Stevenson, R. J., Case, T. I., & Oaten, M. J. (2011). Effect of self-reported
sexual arousal on responses to sex-related and non-sex-related dis-
gust cues. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40(1), 7985.
Tybur, J. M., & Gangestad, S. W. (2011). Mate preferences and infectious
disease: theoretical considerations and evidence in humans.
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological
Sciences, 366(1583), 33753388.
Tybur, J. M., Lieberman, D., & Griskevicius, V. (2009). Microbes, mat-
ing, and morality: Individual differences in three functional domains
of disgust. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,97, 103
122. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0015474.
Tybur, J. M., Lieberman, D., Kurzban, R., & DeScioli, P. (2012). Disgust:
evolved function and structure. Psychological Review, 120,6584.
Tybur, J. M., Bryan, A. D., Magnan, R. E., & Hooper, A. E. C. (2011).
Smells like safe sex: olfactory pathogen primes increase intentions
to use condoms. Psychological Science, 22(4), 478480.
Evolutionary Psychological Science
... Disgust is a universal emotion (Ekman, 1992(Ekman, , 1999Waller et al., 2008) whose hypothesized evolved function is to reduce the likelihood of parasitic infection through behavioral avoidance of contaminants (Curtis et al., 2004;Tybur et al., 2013). In recent years, researchers have discovered much about how disgust works, its neural basis, its relationship with immune function, its connection with mating, and some of its antecedents and consequents (e.g., Fessler et al., 2005;Schaller & Duncan, 2007;Schaller & Murray, 2008;Curtis et al., 2011;Fleischman & Fessler, 2011;Schaller, 2011;Tybur et al., 2013Tybur et al., , 2020Al-Shawaf, Lewis, Alley et al., 2015;Al-Shawaf et al., 2018;Jones et al., 2018;Kennair et al., 2018). Despite these advances in our understanding of disgust, an under-explored aspect of this emotion is how it may be used to communicate important information to others. ...
... Current Disgust. This researcher-generated scale consisted of three items-two from a previous study (Al-Shawaf et al., 2018) plus one additional item (How concerned with disease do you feel right now?). The scores on the three items were averaged. ...
... In all four countries, we replicated the well-established finding that women have higher levels of disgust than men Al-Shawaf & Lewis, 2013;. We also found that scores on the SOI-AD were negatively correlated with scores on the TDDS, replicating the finding that short-term mating strategies are associated with lower trait disgust (Al-Shawaf, Al-Shawaf et al., 2018;O'Shea et al., 2019). Table 1 displays the means and standard deviations for the study variables, separated by country. ...
Article
Full-text available
In recent years, researchers have discovered much about how disgust works, its neural basis, its relationship with immune function, its connection with mating, and some of its antecedents and consequents. Despite these advances in our understanding, an under-explored area is how disgust may be used to serve a communicative function, including how individuals might strategically downplay or exaggerate the disgust display in front of different audiences. Here, we generated two hypotheses about potential communicative functions of disgust, and tested these hypotheses in four countries (Turkey, Croatia, Germany, and Norway). We found no evidence in support of either hypothesis in any country. Discussion focuses on the likely falsity of the two central hypotheses, alternative interpretations of our findings, and directions for future research.
... Previous studies point out disgust as a fundamental factor that triggers a 'move-away' reaction, and that also operates in a mateseeking context (e.g., Crosby et al., 2020;Haidt et al., 1994;Tybur et al., 2009). Recent literature has shown negative effects of eliciting different aspects of disgust on mating (Al-Shawaf et al., 2019;O'Shea et al., 2019). Thus, we aimed to compare different aspects of disgust in terms of how damaging they are perceived to be, as well as whether they were avoided in a conversation with a potential mate. ...
... Second, there is conflicting evidence regarding the potential importance and influence of our variables of interest on mating. For instance, scoring low in sexual disgust sensitivity may, on one hand, facilitate finding a mate (e.g., by lowering one's standards or increasing one's willingness to travel farther for short-term mates, White et al., 2022), but on the other it may be considered repulsive, which decreases desire for mating (Al-Shawaf et al., 2019); similarly, although mate preference studies are predominantly focused on the traits linked with physical attractiveness and wealth, few studies involving other traits, for example, being personable/kind, showed that these characteristics are no less important in a potential partner than the former two (Buss et al., 1990). Therefore, instead of detailed hypotheses we asked more general research questions. ...
... These include the intensity of the thermal affect, which reflects the severity of the thermal threat, and the perceived risk of the pathogen threat [65]. Additionally, individuals with higher disgust sensitivity, which is linked to pathogen avoidance, may be more likely to prioritize avoiding pathogen threats (e.g., [66]). ...
... Dating an unambitious, filthy, hostile, clingy, or depressed partner will and has likely imposed costs on people who are indiscriminate in their mate choice (Hammen & Peters, 1978). For instance, being "filthy" may serve as a warning signal of risk for infection and, indeed, disgust systems may have evolved to protect people from the recurrent risks posed by the uniquely ultrasocial way of human life (Al-Shawaf et al., 2019). Further, dating someone abusive, depressed, hostile, or arrogant may impose relationship costs making the relationship harder to maintain. ...
Article
Full-text available
While there is substantial research on what people want in their romantic and sexual partners, much of this work focuses on WEIRD, youthful samples, fails to consider the role of undesirable characteristics (i.e., things people do not want in partners) at all, or in conjunction with desirable characteristics (i.e., things people do want in partners), and may be overly reliant on psychometric approaches to pivotal variables in mating psychology like mate value and sociosexuality. In a nationally representative (online) sample of 2280 people from Czechia (aged between 18 and 50 years old), we examined linear and quadratic age, education, and self-perceived mate value (desirability) effects on the desired levels in mate choice of eight undesirable and seven desirable characteristics in men and women in relation to ostensible metrics of mate value. Self-perceived mate value alone explained little variance (men 1%, women 2%), while all mate value and mating strategy indicators together explained little variance of mate preferences and aversions (men 3%, women 5%). Desirable characteristics were better explained by mate value than undesirable ones. Our results are in line with evolutionary predictions suggesting that women are more demanding. Also, more qualities to offer correlate with more expectations in a partner.
... VR also overcomes limitations associated with other tools used to explore sex-related disgust. For instance, experimental studies on sex-related disgust mainly rely on the presentation of two-dimensional erotic material (e.g., photos, videos; see Al-Shawaf et al., 2018;Fleischman et al., 2015), despite the limited ecological value of such stimuli (Dubé et al., 2022a). Recent studies have revealed that the presentation of three-dimensional sexual stimuli in immersive virtual environments tends to elicit higher levels of subjective and physiological sexual arousal compared to sexually explicit twodimensional videos on a computer monitor (Milani et al., 2022;Simon & Greitemeyer, 2019). ...
Article
Previous research suggests that experiencing disgust in sexual contexts may negatively impact sexual satisfaction and functioning. However, little is known about the mechanisms (e.g., sexual anxiety) that influence or underlie sex-related disgust. Additionally, immersive tendencies may play a role in shaping emotional experiences when presented with sexual cues. Recent technological advancements, especially in virtual reality (VR), offer a promising avenue to explore emotions in simulated intimate and sexual interactions. This study aimed to examine the influence of sexual anxiety and immersive tendencies on reported levels of disgust when exposed to virtual erotica. A sample of 59 participants (≥18 years) completed self-report questionnaires of sexual anxiety and immersive tendencies. Levels of disgust were assessed during exposure to synthetic virtual characters engaging in erotic behaviours of increasing intensity across six scenarios, ranging from flirting to nudity, masturbation, and orgasm. Linear mixed models were performed on observed data. Higher levels of sexual anxiety were significantly associated with increased disgust throughout the immersive experience (β = 0.48), while greater immersive tendencies were significantly linked to lower disgust ratings (β = −0.66). Additionally, disgust ratings significantly increased with the intensity of the virtual sexual stimuli (β = 0.48). Virtual erotica shows promise as a tool to investigate sex-related disgust and its related mechanisms, such as sexual anxiety and immersive tendencies.
Article
Full-text available
Disgust is a protective emotion that coordinates a suite of cognitive and behavioral changes to reduce people’s likelihood of infection. Existing research demonstrates that people react with disgust to pathogenic stimuli compared to non-pathogenic stimuli, but there has been a paucity of research examining whether people are equipped with a more finely graded disgust response: do people discriminate between pathogen threats of different magnitudes and react with more disgust toward pathogen threats of a greater magnitude? We derived multiple novel predictions from the Threat-Dependent Disgust hypothesis and tested them across three experiments involving participants from the United States and India (total n = 1,333). In Study 1 (n = 428), we tested the prediction that people would be more disgusted by a pathogen threat touching their hand relative to their foot, given that touching a pathogen with the hand is more likely to result in the pathogen entering the body envelope (e.g., through the mouth). In Study 2 (n = 453), we tested the prediction that people would be more disgusted by a pathogen threat touching another person’s hand relative to another person’s foot; people touch others more with their hands than with their feet, so a conspecific with a contaminated hand poses a greater disease threat than one with a pathogen on their foot. In Study 3 (n = 452), we tested the prediction that people would be more disgusted by skin wounds caused by pathogenic infections than by surgical incisions; although both wounds pose the risk of exposure to another’s bodily fluids, wounds caused by pathogenic infections pose a greater disease threat. Results across all three experiments suggest that disgust is sensitive to the magnitude of pathogen threat in a more finely tuned manner than previously demonstrated. Discussion focuses on interpretation of this gradient-like sensitivity of disgust, incorporating these findings into the broader disgust literature, and future directions.
Article
Full-text available
With the rise of dating apps, people have access to a vast pool of potential partners at their fingertips. The present study examined how various factors would predict an individual's dating decisions in a dating app–analog study. Participants (N = 269) first completed some trait measures and then a mock-dating task in which they judged the attractiveness of a series of targets and then decided whether to match with the target or not. Their memories for the targets were tested on the second day. People who were more (vs. less) short-term oriented were more likely to match with short-term-oriented targets. Moral disgust and sexual disgust negatively predicted the matching with short-term oriented targets. Contrary to our hypothesis, we did not find support that people with higher (vs. lower) pathogen disgust sensitivity would selectively match with more attractive targets. Exploratory analyses showed that people who were more (vs. less) short-term oriented, more (vs. less) sexually attractive, or had higher (v. lower) mate value, were more likely to match with targets they considered as attractive. Finally, people have better memories of the faces they chose to match than to not match. Implications to mating research and limitations were discussed.
Article
Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) has been conceptualized as the product of dysfunctional harm prevention systems accompanied by heightened negative emotions like disgust. However, models have not fully accounted for functional heterogeneity in OCD, such as the distinction between OCD subtypes (autogenous vs. reactive) and their differing profiles of relationships with other psychological constructs. The current investigation tested hypotheses about different expected associations between OCD subtypes, disgust, and mating strategies. In Study 1 (patients with self-reported diagnoses of OCD; n = 70), reactive obsessions were associated with higher pathogen disgust but had no associations with mating strategy. Autogenous obsessions had no associations with disgust domains but were associated with higher short-term (and lower long-term) mating orientation. In Study 2 (undergraduate sample; n = 458), reactive obsessions, again, were associated with heightened pathogen disgust but again had no association to mating strategy. Autogenous obsessions were associated with lower pathogen, moral, and sexual disgust, and again, higher short-term (and lower long-term) mating orientation. In both studies, we tested sexual disgust as a mediator of the relationship between autogenous obsessions and short-term mating. Significant mediation was found in Study 2, but not Study 1. Results demonstrate that reactive and autogenous forms of OCD are differentiated by disgust and mating strategy and have implications for evolutionary models of OCD.
Article
Full-text available
Investigations on mate choice in humans frequently report preferences, but there is little knowledge about what is important for rejection by a potential mate. The present study aims to verify if facial asymmetry and facial disharmony have an influence on mate rejection by men. We hypothesized that more asymmetric and disharmonious faces would be more rejected. For this purpose, photographs of women's faces were presented in pairs by self-declared heterosexual men. It was requested they reject one of the faces as a potential mate for a long-term relationship. Women's faces were also analyzed to measure facial asymmetry and facial disharmony. We used a linear mixed model to evaluate the effect of the cited metrics on each face's number of rejections. We found that the female metrics influenced mate rejection only if associated with male age and income. The older participants rejected female partners with asymmetric faces. We suggest that aging makes men more demanding in mate choices, at least considering facial asymmetry. We concluded that rejection could be a key variable in mate choice studies, but further research is needed to clarify its effects.
Book
Full-text available
Evolutionary Psychology: The New Science of the Mind, 6th edition. Contains a major update of the past 4 years of research on topics ranging from mating to murder, from cooperation to status hierarchies. https://www.amazon.com/Evolutionary-Psychology-New-Science-Mind/dp/1138088617/ref=dp_ob_image_bk
Article
Full-text available
Women have consistently higher levels of disgust than men. This sex difference is substantial in magnitude, highly replicable, emerges with diverse assessment methods, and affects a wide array of outcomes—including job selection, mate choice, food aversions, and psychological disorders. Despite the importance of this far-reaching sex difference, sound theoretical explanations have lagged behind the empirical discoveries. In this article, we focus on the evolutionary-functional level of analysis, outlining hypotheses capable of explaining why women have higher levels of disgust than men. We present four hypotheses for sexual disgust and six for pathogen disgust, along with testable predictions. Discussion focuses on additional new hypotheses and on future research capable of adjudicating among these competing, but not mutually exclusive, hypotheses.
Article
Full-text available
Sexual arousal is a motivational state that moves humans toward situations that inherently pose a risk of disease transmission. Disgust is an emotion that adaptively moves humans away from such situations. Incongruent is the fact that sexual activity is elementary to human fitness yet involves strong disgust elicitors. Using an experimental paradigm, we investigated how these two states interact. Women (final N=76) were assigned to one of four conditions: rate disgust stimuli then watch a pornographic clip; watch a pornographic clip then rate disgust stimuli; rate fear stimuli then watch a pornographic clip; or watch a pornographic clip then rate fear stimuli. Women's genital sexual arousal was measured with vaginal photoplethysmography and their disgust and fear reactions were measured via self-report. We did not find that baseline disgust propensity predicted sexual arousal in women who were exposed to neutral stimuli before erotic content. In the Erotic-before-Disgust condition we did not find that sexual arousal straightforwardly predicted decreased image disgust ratings. However, we did find some evidence that sexual arousal increased self-reported disgust in women with high trait disgust and sexual arousal decreased self-reported disgust in women with low trait disgust. Women who were exposed to disgusting images before erotic content showed significantly less sexual arousal than women in the control condition or women exposed to fear-inducing images before erotic content. In the Disgust-before-Erotic condition the degree of self-reported disgust was negatively correlated with genital sexual arousal. Hence, in the conflict between the ultimate goals of reproduction and disease avoidance, cues of the presence of pathogens significantly reduce the motivation to engage in mating behaviors that, by their nature, entail a risk of pathogen transmission.
Article
Full-text available
Evolutionary psychologists have hypothesized that men and women possess both long-term and short-term mating strategies, with men's short-term strategy differentially rooted in the desire for sexual variety. In this article, findings from a cross-cultural survey of 16,288 people across 10 major world regions (including North America, South America, Western Europe, Eastern Europe, Southern Europe, Middle East, Africa, Oceania, South/Southeast Asia, and East Asia) demonstrate that sex differences in the desire for sexual variety are culturally universal throughout these world regions. Sex differences were evident regardless of whether mean, median, distributional, or categorical indexes of sexual differentiation were evaluated. Sex differences were evident regardless of the measures used to evaluate them. Among contemporary theories of human mating, pluralistic approaches that hypothesize sex differences in the evolved design of short-term mating provide the most compelling account of these robust empirical findings.
Article
Full-text available
Recent studies suggest that pathogen-related factors may contribute to systematic variation in women's preferences for masculinity in men's faces. However, there is very little evidence for similar correlations between pathogen-related factors and women's preferences for masculinity in other domains (e.g., men's voices or bodies). Consequently, we conducted a series of studies to examine whether pathogen disgust (assessed using Tybur et al's Three Domains of Disgust Scale) predicts individual differences in women's preferences for masculine characteristics in men's voices, bodies, and faces. We also tested if pathogen disgust predicts individual differences in measures of women's actual mate choices in the same way. We observed positive correlations between women's pathogen disgust and their preferences for masculinity in men's voices (Study 1) and faces and bodies (Study 2). We also observed positive correlations between women's pathogen disgust and their masculinity ratings of both their current and ideal romantic partners (Study 3). Each of these correlations was independent of the possible effects of women's sexual and moral disgust. Together, these findings suggest that individual differences in pathogen disgust predict individual differences in women's masculinity preferences across multiple domains and may also predict individual differences in their actual mate choices.
Article
Full-text available
Evolutionary psychologists have hypothesized that men and women possess both long-term and short-term mating strategies, with men's short-term strategy differentially rooted in the desire for sexual variety. In this article, findings from a cross-cultural survey of 16,288 people across 10 major world regions (including North America, South America, Western Europe, Eastern Europe, Southern Europe, Middle East, Africa, Oceania, South/Southeast Asia, and East Asia) demonstrate that sex differences in the desire for sexual variety are culturally universal throughout these world regions. Sex differences were evident regardless of whether mean, median, distributional, or categorical indexes of sexual differentiation were evaluated. Sex differences were evident regardless of the measures used to evaluate them. Among contemporary theories of human mating, pluralistic approaches that hypothesize sex differences in the evolved design of short-term mating provide the most compelling account of these robust empirical findings. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)
Article
Al-Shawaf et al. (2015, Evolution & Human Behavior, 36, 199–205) found that people who were more interested in pursuing a short-term mating strategy (indexed by higher total scores on the Revised Sociosexual Orientation Inventory) reported less sexual disgust (indexed by lower scores on the sexual disgust subscale of the Three Domain Disgust Scale). By contrast with these results for sexual disgust, Al-Shawaf et al. (2015) observed no significant associations between interest in pursuing a short-term mating strategy and moral or pathogen disgust. This pattern of results, wherein sociosexuality correlates with lower sexual disgust but is unconnected to disgust more generally, may indicate specific cognitive adaptations that counter the possible disgust responses associated with engaging in short-term mating. Here we replicated Al-Shawaf et al.'s (2015) findings for sexual disgust and sociosexual orientation in a large sample (N = 7166). Although we found that individuals who were more interested in pursuing a short-term mating strategy reported significantly lower moral disgust, these relationships were very weak. Together, these results suggest a robust relationship between disgust and short-term mating that is relatively specific to sexual disgust.
Article
Evolutionary approaches to the emotions have traditionally focused on a subset of emotions that are shared with other species, characterized by distinct signals, and designed to solve a few key adaptive problems. By contrast, an evolutionary psychological approach (a) broadens the range of adaptive problems emotions have evolved to solve, (b) includes emotions that lack distinctive signals and are unique to humans, and (c) synthesizes an evolutionary approach with an information-processing perspective. On this view, emotions are superordinate mechanisms that evolved to coordinate the activity of other programs in the solution of adaptive problems. We illustrate the heuristic value of this approach by furnishing novel hypotheses for disgust and sexual arousal and highlighting unexplored areas of research.
Article
An evolutionary task analysis predicts a connection between disgust and human mating, two important but currently disconnected areas of psychology. Because short-term mating strategies involve sex with multiple partners after brief temporal durations, such a strategy should be difficult to pursue in conjunction with high levels of sexual disgust. On this basis, we hypothesized that individuals with a stronger proclivity for short-term mating would exhibit dispositionally lower levels of sexual disgust. Two independent studies provided strong support for this hypothesis: among both men and women, an orientation toward short-term mating was associated with reduced levels of sexual disgust, but not with suppressed moral or pathogen disgust. Our discussion highlights an unexpected finding and suggests important questions for future research.