ArticlePDF Available

Abstract and Figures

Short-term mating strategies involve casual sex, multiple partners, and short-time intervals before initiating intercourse. Such strategies should be difficult to implement in the presence of high levels of sexual disgust. Researchers have therefore suggested—and found evidence for—the hypothesis that individuals with a stronger proclivity for short-term mating have lower levels of sexual disgust. Here, we suggest a related hypothesis: inducing sexual disgust should reduce desire for short-term mating. Experiment 1 (N = 341) and experiment 2 (N = 361) investigated the effects of disgust induction on desire for short-term mating. Both studies found that inducing disgust reduces desire for short-term mating, and that the effect of sexual disgust is particularly strong. These results support the novel hypothesis advanced here and corroborate the broader hypothesis that reduced sexual disgust is a previously undiscovered design feature of short-term mating strategies.
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Experimentally Inducing Disgust Reduces Desire for Short-Term Mating
Laith Al-Shawaf
1
&David M. G. Lewis
2
&Maliki Eyvonne Ghossainy
3
&David M. Buss
4
#Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018
Abstract
Short-term mating strategies involve casual sex, multiple partners, and short-time intervals before initiating intercourse. Such
strategies should be difficult to implement in the presence of high levels of sexual disgust. Researchers have therefore
suggestedand found evidence forthe hypothesis that individuals with a stronger proclivity for short-term mating have lower
levels of sexual disgust. Here, we suggest a related hypothesis: inducing sexual disgust should reduce desire for short-term
mating. Experiment 1 (N= 341) and experiment 2 (N= 361) investigated the effects of disgust induction on desire for short-term
mating. Both studies found that inducing disgust reduces desire for short-term mating, and that the effect of sexual disgust is
particularly strong. These results support the novel hypothesis advanced here and corroborate the broader hypothesis that reduced
sexual disgust is a previously undiscovered design feature of short-term mating strategies.
Keywords Disgust .Emotions .Evolutionary psychology .Sexual disgust .Mating .Short-term mating
Introduction
The emotion of disgust and the psychology of human mating
have conceptual relevance for one another, but have largely
been studied in isolation. Recent research has begun to bridge
these two areas of inquiry (Al-Shawaf et al. 2015a,b,c; Borg
and de Jong 2012; Curtis, de Barra, & Aunger, 2011;
DeBruine et al. 2010; Jones et al. 2013;deJongetal,2009;
de Jong et al., 2010;deJongetal.,2013; Lee et al. 2014; Little
et al. 2011; Tybur and Gangestad 2011; Tybur et al. 2011).
Such work has found, for example, a bidirectional relationship
between disgust and sexual arousal. Sexual arousal can inhibit
disgust (e.g., Ariely and Loewenstein 2006), but disgust can
also inhibit sexual arousal (e.g., Fleischman et al. 2015). The
bidirectional nature of the relationship between disgust and
mating is important: mating is a crucial aspect of human life,
but disgust must be inhibited in order to facilitate successful
sexual congress. On the other hand, disgust mustbe capable of
inhibiting or shutting down sexual arousal in extreme circum-
stances, such as when cues to pathogens are powerful and
numerous, or when new information is discovered that renders
a potential mate unsuitable (e.g., he is abusive, she has a sex-
ually transmitted infection, he is a close-genetic relative).
Despite recent advances in disgust research and mating
research, much work remains in connecting these conceptual-
ly related domains. Recent research bridging the two has
found that individuals with a stronger proclivity for short-
term mating have lower levels of sexual disgust than their less
short-term-oriented counterparts (Al-Shawaf et al. 2015c).
Researchers predicted this finding based on a task analysis
of short-term mating strategies: because short-term mating
involves casual sex, multiple sex partners, and intercourse
after brief periods of acquaintance, implementing this strategy
would be difficult without a functional reduction in sexual
disgust levels. Two independent studies supported this hy-
pothesis (Al-Shawaf et al. 2015c), and these findings have
now been replicated by an independent group of researchers
using a large online sample (OShea et al. in press).
If low levels of sexual disgust are a key facilitator of short-
term mating strategies, then experimentally inducing sexual
disgust should reduce peoples desire for short-term mating.
This paper reports two experiments designed to test this
hypothesis.
*Laith Al-Shawaf
lalshawa@uccs.edu
1
Department of Psychology, University of Colorado, Colorado
Springs, USA
2
School of Psychology and Exercise Science, Murdoch University,
Perth, Australia
3
Department of Psychology, American University of Beirut,
Beirut, Lebanon
4
Department of Psychology, The University of Texas at Austin,
Austin, TX, USA
Evolutionary Psychological Science
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-018-0179-z
Different Forms of Disgustand Their Relevance
to Short-Term Mating
Recent research has identified three types of disgust: pathogen
disgust,sexual disgust,andmoral disgust (Tybur et al. 2009,
2012). These three types of disgust are distinguished by the
social and ecological inputs that activate them, the distinct
behavioral outputs that they motivate, and their unique pro-
files of correlations with other psychological variables.
Our reasoning specifically implicates sexual disgust as rel-
evant to short-term mating. Consistent with this, individuals
dispositionally inclined toward short-term mating exhibit low
levels of sexual disgust, but not pathogen or moral disgust (Al-
Shawaf et al. 2015c). Conceptually, however, pathogen dis-
gust is also relevant to short-term mating: an important cost of
short-term mating is increased risk of transmission of sexually
transmitted infections and other contagious diseases (National
Center for HIV/AIDS, viral hepatitis, STD, and TB
Prevention 2011). Some cuessuch as a nude human body
covered in sores or lesionsshould trigger both pathogen
disgust and sexual disgust.
Al-Shawaf and colleagues reasoned that the absence of a
relationship between pathogen disgust and short-term mating
might be an artifact of the nature of pathogen disgust mea-
sures. The pathogen disgust subscale of the Three-Domain
Disgust Scalearguably the most conceptually sound and
psychometrically valid disgust measure (Al-Shawaf and
Lewis 2013; Haidt et al. 1994; Tybur et al. 2009 for more
detail)appears to be constructed so as to index Bpure^path-
ogen disgust: pathogen disgust that does not overlap with
measures of other forms of disgust. Developing an instrument
with conceptually distinct subscales for pathogen and sexual
disgust entails excluding items that simultaneously tap both
types of disgust. Although sexual and pathogen disgust have
some non-overlapping domains (e.g., rotting meat might in-
duce pathogen disgust but not sexual disgust, incest might
induce sexual disgust but not pathogen disgust), sexual con-
tact is a key pathogen-transmission vector. This importance of
sexual contact as a pathogen vector renders the two domains
inherently linkeda linkage not fully captured by the design
of the extant three-factor measure of disgust.
We predicted that a more naturalistic investigation of path-
ogen disgustor an investigation that does not limit itself to
Bpure^pathogen cueswould find a relationship between
pathogen disgust and short-term mating. We expect images
of diseased human bodies, for example, to trigger pathogen
disgust and sexual disgust because of the infection risks inher-
ent in sexual contact.
In the current experiments, we do not limit ourselves to
Bpure^pathogen cues, and so we expect that inducing patho-
gen disgust will have an effect on short-term mating desire.
However, because only a limited subset of pathogen cues
should be relevant to short-term mating (e.g., diseased bodies,
but not rodents or rotting food), we predicted that the effect of
pathogen disgust on short-term mating desire would be weak-
er than the effect of sexual disgust.
Experiment 1: the Effect of Disgust Induction
on Short-Term Mating
Experiment 1 aimed to determine the impact of experimental-
ly induced disgust on desire for short-term mating. We includ-
ed four experimental conditions: sexual disgust, pathogen dis-
gust, a neutral control condition, and a threatening control. We
did not have any hypotheses about the threatening control
group; we included it to permit discrimination between the
effects of negative emotion induction in general and disgust
induction specifically.
Method
Participants
Three hundred fifty two participants (179 men, 162 women;
M
age
= 19.21, SD
age
= 1.44, age range: 1828 years) were
recruited from the psychology subject pool at The
University of Texas at Austin to participate in a study about
Bdisgust and human mating^. Sample size was determined
before any data analysis. Participant breakdown by experi-
mental condition was as follows: sexual disgust: 86 (40
males), pathogen disgust: 87 (45 males), neutral control: 82
(45 males), and threatening control: 86 (49 males).
Participants arrived at the laboratory, provided informed con-
sent to participate in the study, and were escorted by a re-
searcher to a private room where they completed the experi-
ment. Participants received partial course credit for their par-
ticipation and were debriefed upon completion.
Design
Experiment 1 was a 2 × 4 mixed-design ANOVA with one
within-subjects factor (interest in short-term mating: pre- and
post-manipulation) and one between-subjects factor (experi-
mental condition: sexual disgust, pathogen disgust, neutral
control, and threatening control).
The experimental manipulation differed for each group: the
sexual disgust group looked at a set of 20 images that included
nude elderly individuals, genitalia exhibiting cues to sexually
transmitted disease, and similar sexual disgust stimuli; all ob-
tained from the web. Participants in this group were also
instructed to Bplease imagine what it would be like to be in a
sexually intimate situation with the person depicted in this
picture^. These instructions served to make the sexual aspect
of the situation more salient, thereby making it more likely
that participantsprimary reaction would be sexual disgust
Evolutionary Psychological Science
rather than pathogen or moral disgust. The pathogen disgust
group viewed a series of 20 images designed to induce disgust
associated with pathogen vectors, including diseased human
bodies, rotting food items, rodents, and feces. The threatening
control group viewed a series of 20 images of men in menac-
ing poses, pointing guns directly at the screen (adapted from
Schaller et al. 2010). Participants viewed the slides for as long
as they chose to: they had to click Bnext^to proceed to the
next image. This was to prevent participants from simply
closing their eyes and allowing the slideshow to finish without
having viewed the stimuli. The neutral control group did not
undergo any experimental manipulation.
Participants in each group completed a measure of interest
in short-term mating both prior to and after exposure to the
respective experimental stimuli. Finally, participants
responded to items designed to assess current disgust levels,
as well as other instruments as part of a broader study. The
order of materials was as follows: pre-measure of short-term
mating desire, experimental disgust induction, measure of cur-
rent disgust, post-measure of short-term mating desire, Three-
Domain Disgust Scale, and finally demographic questions.
All stimuli are available upon request from the first author.
Materials
Current Interest in Short-Term Mating Because we were inter-
ested in current short-term mating desireas opposed to dis-
positional orientation toward short-term matingthe standard
sociosexual orientation inventory (SOI-R, Penke and
Asendorpf 2008)wouldnothavebeenanappropriatemea-
sure. Accordingly, we designed a four-item scale to index
current interest in short-term mating. This scale consisted of
the following items, which were evaluated on a Likert-type
scale: BHow hard would it be for you to experience a sexual
fantasy right now?^(reverse coded), BRight now, how com-
fortable would you be having sex with somebody that you just
met?^,BIf you went on a first date with somebody tonight,
how willing do you think you would be to have sex with him
or her on the first date?^, and BHow desirable [as a mate]
would someone have to be in order for you to have sex with
that person on the first date?^(reverse coded). Participants
completed this scale before and after the experimental disgust
manipulation.
Current Disgust We included an author-generated measure of
current, state-level disgust to assess the effectiveness of our
manipulation. We reasoned that our brief disgust induction
would affect current disgust levels, but not the stable, dispo-
sitional disgust sensitivity measured by the Three-Domain
Disgust Scale. We therefore generated two items intended to
serve as a brief, face-valid method of capturing current dis-
gust. These two items were BHow disgusting did you find the
series of images you just saw?^and BHow disgusted do you
feel right now?^
Results
Manipulation Check
We tested the efficacy of our disgust induction procedure
by comparing the post-manipulation disgust levels across
condition, excluding participants in the neutral control
condition, who did not view any images. A one-way
ANOVA confirmed that there were significant differences
in disgust levels across conditions, F(2, 254) = 124.49,
p< .001, partial η
2
= .50. Disgust means and standard
deviations for each experimental condition were as fol-
lows: sexual 13.27 (SD = 1.76), pathogen 10.58 (SD =
2.93), and threatening control 6.47 (SD = 3.56), Post-
hoc tests revealed significant differences in disgust be-
tween all three groups. The sexual disgust group exhibit-
ed the highest levels of disgustsignificantly higher than
the pathogen disgust group (difference between means =
2.69, SE = .37, p< .001) and the threatening control
group (difference between means = 6.80, SE = .43,
p< .001). Additionally, the pathogen disgust group ex-
hibited significantly higher disgust than the threatening
control group (difference between means = 4.11,
SE = .50, p< .001).
Descriptive Statistics
Tab le 1presents means and standard deviations for the three
disgust scales (Cronbachsα: moral = .88, sexual = .88, path-
ogen = .82) and the scale measuring current desire for short-
term mating (pre-manipulation α= .71, post-manipulation
α=.73).
Sex differences in disgust followed a similar pattern to
those reported by Tybur et al. (2009,2011). Consistent with
previous research, women exhibited higher levels of sexual
disgust [t(333) = 12.87, p<.001,d= 1.40], pathogen disgust
[t(332) = 4.40, p< .001, d= 0.48], and moral disgust
[t(333) = 2.62, p<.01,d= 0.29] than did men. These find-
ings replicate the reliable sex difference demonstrated inmuch
of the disgust literature over the last several decades: women
exhibit significantly higher levels of disgust than do men (see
Al-Shawaf et al. 2018 for a review and novel hypotheses).
Similarly, sex differences in desire for short-term
mating [pre-disgust-induction: t(301) = 13.07, p< .001,
d= 1.4; post-disgust-induction: t(286) = 13.31,
p< .001, d= 1.43] corroborated the robust and well-
replicated finding that short-term mating looms larger
in mens psychology than in womens(Buss2015;
Buss and Schmitt 1993; Lippa 2009).
Evolutionary Psychological Science
Interaction: Disgust Manipulation * Experimental Condition
We conducted a mixed-model ANOVA with one within-
subjects factor (interest in short-term mating: pre- and post-
manipulation) and one between-subjects factor (experimental
condition) in order to assess the effect of the disgust manipu-
lation on desire for short-term mating and to determine wheth-
er this effect differed according to experimental condition.
There was a statistically significant disgust manipulation ×
experimental condition interaction on short-term mating de-
sire, F(3, 332) = 19.47, p< .001, partial η
2
= .15, indicating
that there were differential effects of the disgust manipulation
across conditions.
Simple Effects of Disgust Manipulation
Before analyzing the simple effects of the disgust manipula-
tion across experimental condition, we checked for sex differ-
ences in the extent to which the disgust manipulation affected
desire for short-term mating. There were no sex differences in
change in desire for short-term mating in any of the experi-
mental conditions (all ps > .05), so we collapsed across sex.
Because our primary hypothesis was that inducing disgust
particularly sexual disgust leads to a decrease in desire for
short-term mating, we began by analyzing the simple effects of
the experimental manipulations. As expected, participants ex-
posed to the sexual disgust stimuli exhibited a significant reduc-
tion in desire for short-term mating, F(1, 85) = 79.24, p< .001,
partial η
2
= .48. The participants in the pathogen disgust condi-
tion also exhibited a reduction in short-term mating desire: F(1,
85) = 24.51, p< .001, partial η
2
= .22. The threatening control
group also experienced a dip in desire for short-term mating,
F(1, 82) = 9.72, p< .01, partial η
2
= .11. As expected, there was
no change in desire for short-term mating in the neutral control
group, F(1, 80) = .86, p= .36, partial η
2
=.01.
In order to test the magnitude of the reduction across
conditions, we computed a pre-post manipulation differ-
ence score for each experimental condition. A one-way
ANOVA indicated that, as predicted, there was a signif-
icant difference in the magnitude of the reduction in
short-term mating desire across conditions, F(3, 332) =
19.47, p< .001, partial η
2
= .15. Post-hoc tests revealed
that individuals in the sexual disgust condition experi-
enced the greatest reduction in short-term mating desire
(all post-hoc tests reported in this manuscript are Tukey
HSDs). This decline was greater than that in the patho-
gen disgust condition (difference between means = 1.81,
SE = .49, p= .001, the threatening control condition
(difference between means = 2.51, SE = .47, p< .001),
and the neutral control condition (difference between
means = 3.14, SE = .45, p<.001; see Fig. 1).
Simple Effects of Experimental Condition
Prior to the manipulation, there were no differences between
conditions in desire for short-term mating, F(3, 341) = .87, ns,
partial η
2
= .01. After the manipulation, there was a significant
difference between groups in desire for short-term mating,
F(3, 333) = 10.06, p< .001, partial η
2
= .08. Post-hoc tests
revealed that the sexual disgust group had the lowest desire
for short-term matinglower than the pathogen disgust group
(difference between means = 2.04, SE = .71, p<.05), the
threatening control group (difference between means = 3.61,
SE = .76, p< .01), and the neutral control group (difference
betweenmeans=3.87,SE=.79,p< .01). There were no other
post-manipulationbetween-group differences in short-term
mating desire (all ps > .05).
Table 1 Means, standard
deviations, and effect sizes for the
sex differences in experiment 1
Disgust subscale (TDDS) Men mean (SD) Women mean (SD) Cohensd
Sexual 24.60 (9.51) 37.04 (8.20) 1.40
Moral 31.51 (9.71) 34.18 (8.97) .29
Pathogen 32.82 (8.19) 36.53 (7.17) .48
Current desire for short-term mating
Pre-disgust induction 14.78 (5.33) 8.57 (3.30) 1.39
Post-disgust induction 13.23 (5.32) 7.02 (3.05) 1.41
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
Control Group Threatening Control Pathogen Disgust Sexual Disgust
Experimental condition
Change in short-term mating desire
Experiment 1: Change in short-term mating desire across conditions
Fig. 1 Change in desire for short-term mating across conditions in ex-
periment 1. The sexual disgust condition experienced the greatest reduc-
tion in desire for short-term mating. Bars represent pre-post manipulation
difference scores and error bars represent 95% confidence intervals
Evolutionary Psychological Science
Discussion
The results of experiment 1 support the central hypothesis that
inducing sexual disgust reduces short-term mating desire. By
including both pre- and post-measures of short-term mating de-
sire, we were able to directly measure change in desire for short-
term mating as a consequence of disgust induction. This analysis
revealed several findings that support the primary hypothesis of
this study: a) the groups did not differ in their desire for short-
term mating before the manipulation, but did differ after the
manipulation, b) the sexual disgust group showed the strongest
decline in desire for short-term mating, c) the neutral control
group showed no change in desire for short-term mating, and
d) post-hoc tests revealed that after disgust induction, the sexual
disgust group exhibited lower desire for short-term mating than
all three other groups, and none of the other groups differed in
their desire for short-term mating. It is interesting to note both the
power of sexual disgust to reduce short-term mating desire, as
well as the finding that pathogen disgust primes and threatening
primes also have an impact on short-term mating desire. This
suggests that inducing other negative emotionsperhaps those
that signal pressing adaptive problemscanalsohaveaneffect
on short-term mating desire, but that the effect of sexual disgust is
especially powerful.
Experiment 2: the Effect of Different Modes
of Disgust Induction on Desire for Short-Term
Mating
We sought to replicate this central finding in an independent
study with a new sample, different experimental conditions in-
volving additional perceptual modalities, and novel stimuli. We
conducted a second study in which we included five experimen-
tal conditions: visual sexual disgust, visual pathogen disgust,
olfactory pathogen disgust, text-based pathogen disgust, and a
threatening control. Our central hypothesis was the same as that
of experiment 1: inducing disgustespecially sexual disgust
should cause a decline in desire for short-term mating.
Method
Participants
Three hundred fifty participants (153 men, 194 women, 3
unreported; M
age
=18.83, SD
age
= 1.16, age range: 17
26 years) were recruited from the psychology subject pool at
The University of Texas at Austin. Sample size was deter-
mined before any data analysis. No participants from experi-
ment 1 participated in experiment 2. Participants arrived at the
laboratory, provided informed consent to participate in the
study, and were escorted by a researcher to a private room
where they completed the experiment. Participants received
partial course credit for their participation and were debriefed
upon completion.
Design
Similar to experiment 1, experiment 2 was a 2 × 5 mixed-
design ANOVA with one within-subjects factor (interest in
short-term mating: pre- and post-manipulation) and one
between-subjects factor (experimental condition: visual sexu-
al, visual pathogen, olfactory pathogen, text-based pathogen,
and threatening control).
Participant breakdown by experimental condition was as
follows: sexual 69 (34 males), pathogen 67 (24 males), olfac-
tory 67 (30 males), text-based 65 (36 males), and threatening
control 70 (25 males).
The two new conditions in this experiment were the text-
based pathogen condition and the olfactory pathogen condi-
tion. The text-based group read a popular internet story about
parasitic invertebrate infection whose text was modified for
this experiment in order to induce pathogen disgust. We in-
duced pathogen disgust in the olfactory group with the use of
Liquid ASS®(Liquid ASSets Novelties, LLC, USA), a spray
that mimics the odor of putrid feces. As in experiment 1,
participants completed the same scale measuring desire for
short-term mating, underwent the disgust manipulation, com-
pleted the short-term mating scale again, and finally complet-
ed the instrument designed to assess current disgust.
We retained the threatening control because the threatening
control group in experiment 1 experienced a dip in desire for
short-term mating. If we wish to establish that inducing dis-
gust causes a significant decline in desire for short-term mat-
ing over and above aversive states in general, then the more
appropriate and more conservative control condition is that of
the threatening prime.
The disgust induction procedure was somewhat different in
the olfactory pathogen condition. In this condition, at the same
point in the survey at which the manipulations were intro-
duced into the other conditions, the survey prompted the par-
ticipant to step outside of the private laboratory room and call
the experimenter. The experimenter then entered the partici-
pants room with a rag that had been sprayed twice in the same
spot with Liquid ASS®. The experimenter held out the rag
and asked participants to take two deep breaths with their nose
in the spot where the smell had been sprayed. When this
procedure was completed, the experimenter stepped out of
the room again, permitting the participant to complete the
experiment in privacy.
Materials
Participants completed the same instruments as in experiment
1, including the short-term mating scale and the measure of
current disgust.
Evolutionary Psychological Science
Results
Manipulation Check
As in experiment 1, we tested the efficacy of our disgust ma-
nipulation by comparing the post-manipulation disgust levels
of our five groups. Disgust means and standard deviations for
each experimental condition were as follows: sexual 11.539
(SD = 3.14), pathogen 11.82 (SD = 2.87), olfactory 10.81
(SD = 3.64), text-based 10.81 (SD = 3.64), and threatening
control 10.92 (SD = 3.48). A one-way ANOVA confirmed
that disgust levels did not differ significantly between condi-
tions, F(4, 333) = 1.22, p=.30, partial η
2
=.014.
Descriptive Statistics
Tab le 2presents experiment 2 means and standard deviations
for the three disgust scales (Cronbachsα:moral=.89,sexu-
al = .88, pathogen = .79) and the researcher-generated scale
indexing current desire for short-term mating (pre-manipula-
tion α= .71, post-manipulation α=.70).
Sex differences in disgust were consistent with experiment
1 and with previous research. Women in the current study
exhibited stronger sexual disgust [t(328) = 12.83, p<.001,
d= 1.41] and pathogen disgust [t(290) = 7.81, p< .001,
d= .87]. The sex difference in moral disgust, though in the
expected direction, did not reach significance [t(301) = 1.53,
p=.1, d= .17]. As in experiment 1, sex differences in desire
for short-term mating [pre-disgust-induction t(266) = 12.30,
p< .001, d= 1.36; post-disgust-induction t(260) = 10.51,
p< .001, d= 1.16] again corroborated the well-established
finding that men are more inclined toward short-term mating
than are women (Schmitt 2003).
Interaction: Disgust Manipulation * Experimental Condition
As in experiment 1, we conducted a mixed analysis of variance
(ANOVA) with one within-subjects factor (interest in short-
term mating: pre- and post-manipulation) and one between-
subjects factor (experimental condition) in order to assess the
effect of the disgust manipulation on desire for short-term
mating and to determine whether this effect differed by exper-
imental condition. As in experiment 1, there was a significant
interaction between experimental condition and the disgust
manipulation, F(4, 347) = 6.73, p< .001, partial η
2
= .07, indi-
cating that the effect of the manipulation differed across
conditions.
Simple Effect of the Disgust Manipulation
To unpack this significant interaction, we again analyzed the
simple effects of disgust manipulation and experimental con-
dition separately. As in experiment 1, these effects did not
differ by sex, so we provide the results of these tests for men
and women together.
Because our primary hypothesis was that inducing disgust
especially sexual disgustshould lead to a decrease in desire for
short-term mating, we began with the simple effects of the dis-
gust manipulations. As in experiment 1, there was a significant
decline in desire for short-term mating in the sexual disgust
group, F(1, 69) = 63.16, p< .001, partial η
2
= .48, and in the
visual pathogen group, F(1, 69) = 16.73, p< .001, partial
η
2
= .20. The olfactory and text-based disgust groups also exhib-
ited declines in short-term mating desire [olfactory F(1,70) =
23.86, p< .001, partial η
2
=.25, text-based F(1, 69) = 26.22,
p< .001, partial η
2
= .28]. The threatening control group, on
the other hand, showed no change in desire for short-term mat-
ing, F(1,70) = 2.81, ns,partialη
2
=.04.
In order to test the magnitude of the reduction in short-term
mating desire across condition, we computed a pre-post ma-
nipulation difference score for each experimental condition. A
one-way ANOVA indicated that, as predictedand replicat-
ing the findings of experiment 1there was a significant dif-
ference in the magnitude of the reduction in short-term mating
desire across conditions, F(4, 347) = 6.73, p< .001, partial
η
2
= .07. Post-hoc tests revealed that individuals in the sexual
disgust condition experienced a greater reduction in short-
term mating desire than those in the visual pathogen disgust
condition (difference between means = 1.81, SE = .55,
p= .011), the text-based pathogen condition (difference be-
tween means = 1.56, SE = .55, p< .05), and the threatening
control condition (difference between means = 2.79,
SE = .55, p< .001) (Fig. 2).
Table 2 Means, standard
deviations, and effect sizes for the
sex differences in experiment 2
Disgust subscale (TDDS) Men mean (SD) Women mean (SD) Cohensd
Sexual 22.50 (8.52) 34.94 (9.09) 1.41
Moral 29.52 (10.23) 31.15 (9.01) .17
Pathogen 30.97 (7.25) 36.94 (6.40) .87
Current desire for short-term mating
Pre-disgust induction 15.08 (5.04) 9.09 (3.65) 1.36
Post-disgust induction 12.76 (5.28) 7.49 (3.73) 1.16
Evolutionary Psychological Science
Simple Effects of Experimental Condition
We followed this with an analysis of the simple effect of con-
dition. As in experiment 1, there were no differences between
groups in desire for short-term mating before the onset of the
manipulation, F(4, 351) = 1.91, ns, partial η
2
= .02. After the
manipulation, howeverand replicating the findings of ex-
periment 1the groups differed in desire for short-term mat-
ing, F(4, 351) = 3.38, p=.01, partialη
2
= .04. Post-hoc tests
revealed that the sexual disgust group had the lowest desire for
short-term matinglower than the threatening control group
[difference between means = 2.34, SE = .80, p= .03] and the
olfactory group [difference between means = 2.82, SE = .85,
p= .01]. There were no other between-group differences in
desire for short-term mating (all ps > .05).
Discussion
The results of experiment 2 cleanly replicate those of experi-
ment 1, providing empirical support for the hypothesis that
inducing disgustespecially sexual disgustleads to a de-
cline in desire for short-term mating. This is especially inter-
esting given that the manipulation check revealed only non-
significant differences in disgust between groups. As in ex-
periment 1, the central findings in experiment 2 provide sev-
eral pieces of evidence in support of our primary hypothesis:
a) the five groups did not differ in their desire for short-term
mating before the manipulation, but did differ after the manip-
ulation, b) the sexual disgust group showed the strongest de-
cline in desire for short-term mating (significantly stronger
than the visual pathogen group, the text-based group, and
the threatening control group), c) the threatening control
group showed no change in desire for short-term mating,
and d) post-hoc tests revealed that after disgust induction,
the sexual disgust group exhibited lower desire for short-
term mating than the threatening control group and the
olfactory disgust group. These results support our primary
hypothesis and show that the results of experiment 1 replicate
robustly across independent samples with modified methods.
General Discussion
The logic underlying our central hypothesis comes from a task
analysis of short-term mating strategies. Since short-term mating
involves casual sex, sex with multiple partners, and sex after brief
periods of acquaintance, those with a strong proclivity for short-
term mating may be less able to implement their preferred mating
strategy in the presence of high levels of sexual disgust. This
reasoning suggests the hypothesis that short-term mating mech-
anisms calibrate sexual disgust levels in order to facilitate the
implementation of those strategies (Al-Shawaf et al. 2015c).
This broad hypothesis gives rise to two specific hypotheses.
The first is that individuals oriented toward short-term mating
should have lower levels of sexual disgust than their less short-
term-oriented counterparts. We have found empirical support for
this hypothesis in two independent studies (Al-Shawaf et al.
2015c). The second hypothesis is the one we advance in this
paper: because low sexual disgust is an important component
of short-term mating strategies, experimentally inducing sexual
disgust should cause a decline in desire for short-term mating.
In both studies, inducing disgust caused a decline in desire
for short-term mating, and this decrease was most pronounced
for those in the sexual disgust group. This suggests that ex-
perimentally inducing disgust has the capacity to inhibit short-
term mating, and that the inhibitory effect of sexual disgust is
particularly strong. In both studies, our groups did not differ in
desire for short-term mating before the disgust manipulation,
but did differ after it, providing 1) evidence for the efficacy of
our disgust induction procedures and 2) evidence that the
findings presented here are not artifacts of baseline differences
between groups in their desire for short-term mating. Together
with the finding that individuals with a stronger proclivity for
short-term mating have lower levels of sexual disgust (Al-
Shawaf et al. 2015c), the current results bolster the hypothesis
that reduced levels of sexual disgust constitute an important
but previously undiscovered design feature of short-term mat-
ing strategies.
Limitations and Future Directions
Our use of experimental methodologyand especially of a
repeated-measures designenables us to make causal infer-
ences about the impact of sexual disgust on short-term mating
desire. Nonetheless, providing convergent evidence using
new stimuli, different methodologies, and novel samples
would buttress support for the hypothesis presented here and
enhance our confidence in the veridicality of our findings.
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
Threatening
Control
Visual
Pathogen Disgust
Text-based
Pathogen Disgust
Olfactory
Pathogen Disgust
Sexual
Disgust
Experimental condition
Change in short-term mating desire
Experiment 2: Change in short-term mating desire across conditions
Fig. 2 Change in desire forshort-term mating across conditions in exper-
iment 2. The sexual disgust condition experienced a greater decline in
desire for short-term mating than the visual pathogen disgust condition,
text-based pathogen disgust condition, and threatening control condition.
Bars represent pre-post manipulation difference scores and error bars
represent 95% confidence intervals
Evolutionary Psychological Science
Our methodology presents two potential limitations. First, in
experiment 1, the neutral control group was not exposed to any
slideshow. An alternative would be to present a neutral
slideshow, as in Mortensen et al. (2010). In this way, the differ-
ence between the neutral condition and other conditions would
be isolated to the content of the slideshow. Second, in experiment
2, our induction of olfactory pathogen disgust required an exper-
imenter to enter the room, a feature that was not present in the
other experimental conditions. Although we think it implausible
that it was the entry of the experimenter rather than the rag with
the offensive odor that was responsible for inducing disgust, a
future design that enables the presentation of the offensive odor
without the presence of the experimenter would be ideal.
The experiments presented are necessarily tied to the way
we operationalized our constructs. It remains to be seen, for
example, whether future experiments will yield the same pat-
tern of results if we employ different images in the pathogen
and sexual conditions, different odors in the olfactory condi-
tion, or different stories in the text-based condition.
Conducting numerous experiments with varying stimuli is a
good way to detect systematic patterns in the results: if differ-
ent stimulus sets reliably reveal similar patterns as the ones we
report here, that points to the robustness and generalizability
of the phenomenon and constitutes good evidence for the
hypothesis under investigation.
An important next step will be to examine the cross-
cultural universality of this phenomenon, as we expect the
relationship between short-term mating strategies and disgust
to be universal. The behavioral outputs, facial displays, and
other outward expressions may vary across individuals and
cultures, but we expect uniformity in the underlying psycho-
logical mechanisms responsible for short-term mating and its
relationship to sexual disgust. Cross-cultural tests also afford
the opportunity to examine variables such as prevalence of
sexually transmitted infections and local pathogen density,
and assess their hypothesized impact on disgust and mating
strategy (see Schaller and Murray 2008).
The hypothesis that short-term mating is partly responsible
for calibrating sexual disgust also points toward a longitudinal
test. Humans have been hypothesized to experience shifts
in mating strategy as a function of contextual or organis-
mic conditions such as operational sex ratio, longitudinal
changes in mate value, as well as life events such as
entering a new romantic relationship, having a child, or
emerging from a break-up (e.g., Burnham et al. 2003;
Buss and Greiling 1999; Gettler et al. 2011;Mazurand
Michalek 1998;McIntyreetal.2006;Schmitt2005). A
valuable test would be to investigate whether these shifts
in mating strategy are accompanied by concomitant shifts
in sexual disgust. For instance, having offspring may up-
regulate sexual disgust, andemergingfromabreak-up
may downregulate sexual disgust to facilitate a persons
re-entry into the mating market.
Another important future direction involves priming partici-
pants with mating mindsets. If low levels of sexual disgust are
needed to facilitate a short-term mating strategy, then successful-
ly priming a short-term mating mindset may cause a temporary
downregulation of sexual disgust (see Ariely and Loewenstein
2006; Borg and de Jong 2012; Stevenson et al. 2011).
A final limitation involves the self-report nature of our mea-
sure of short-term mating interest. Although studies show that
self-report measures predict behavioral measures fairly well
(Glasman and Albarracin 2006), future studies would benefit
from including behavioral, endocrinological, and psychophysio-
logical measures. Convergent evidence from multiple data
sources is always more compelling, and paints a more compre-
hensive picture.
Conclusions
The findings presented here support the hypothesis that experi-
mentally inducing sexual disgust causes a reduction in desire for
short-term matingan effect found for both men and women.
These findings provide corroborative experimental support for
the broader hypothesis that low levels of sexual disgust facilitate
the implementation of short-term mating strategies. Evidence is
now accumulatingfrom experimental and non-experimental
studies using a variety of different types of stimuli and disgust
induction proceduresthat reduced levels of sexual disgust are
an important, previously undiscovered design feature of short-
term mating strategies (Al-Shawaf et al. 2015c). This growing
body of evidence illuminates specialized design features of the
psychology of short-term mating and reveals an important link
between human mating and the emotion of disgust.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author
states that there is no conflict of interest.
PublishersNote Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to juris-
dictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
Al-Shawaf, L., & Lewis, D. M. (2013). Exposed intestines and contam-
inated cooks: Sex, stress, & satiation predict disgust sensitivity.
Personality and Individual Differences,54(6),698702.
Al-Shawaf, L., Conroy-Beam, D., Asao, K., & Buss, D. M. (2015a).
Human emotions: An evolutionary psychological perspective.
Emotion Review, 8,173186. https://doi.org/10.1177/
1754073914565518.
Al-Shawaf, L., Lewis, D. M. G., Alley, T. R., & Buss, D. M. (2015b).
Mating strategy, disgust, and food neophobia. Appetite, 85,3035.
Al-Shawaf, L., Lewis, D. M. G., & Buss, D. M. (2015c). Disgust and
mating strategy. Evolution and Human Behavior, 36(3), 199205.
Evolutionary Psychological Science
Al-Shawaf, L., Lewis, D. M., & Buss, D. M. (2018). Sex differences in
disgust: Why are women more easily disgusted than men? Emotion
Review, 10(2), 149160.
Ariely, D., & Loewenstein, G. (2006). The heat of the moment: the effect
of sexual arousal on sexual decision making. Journal of Behavioral
Decision Making, 19(2), 8798.
Borg, C., & de Jong, P. J. (2012). Feelings of disgust and disgust-induced
avoidance weaken following induced sexual arousal in women. PLoS
One, 7(9), e44111. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0044111.
Burnham, T. C., Chapman, J. F., Gray, P. B., McIntyre, M. H., Lipson, S.
F., & Ellison, P. T. (2003). Men in committed, romantic relationships
have lower testosterone. Hormones and Behavior, 44(2), 119122.
Buss, D. M. (2015). Evolutionary psychology: the new science of the
mind, 5th Edition. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: an evo-
lutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review,
100(2), 204232.
Buss, D. M., & Greiling, H. (1999). Adaptive individual differences.
Journal of Personality, 67(2), 209243.
Curtis, V. A., Aunger, R., & Rabie, T. (2004). Evidence that disgust
evolved to protect from risk of disease. Proceedings of the Royal
Society B: Biological Sciences, 271, 131133. https://doi.org/10.
1098/rsbl.2003.0144.
Curtis, V., De Barra, M., & Aunger, R. (2011). Disgust as an adaptive
system for disease avoidance behaviour. Philosophical Transactions
of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 366(1563),
389401.
DeBruine,L.M.,Jones,B.C.,Tybur,J.M.,Lieberman,D.,&
Griskevicius, V. (2010). Womens preferences for masculinity in
male faces are predicted by pathogen disgust, but not by moral or
sexual disgust. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31(1), 6974.
de Jong, P. J., van Overveld, M., Schultz, W. W., Peters, M. L., &
Buwalda, F. M. (2009). Disgust and contamination sensitivity in
vaginismus and dyspareunia. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38(2),
244252.
de Jong, P. J., van Lankveld, J., Elgersma, H. J., & Borg, C. (2010).
Disgust and sexual problemsTheoretical conceptualization and
case illustrations. International Journal of Cognitive Therapy,
3(1), 2339.
de Jong, P. J., van Overveld, M., & Borg, C. (2013). Giving in to arousal
or staying stuck in disgust? Disgust-based mechanisms in sex and
sexual dysfunction. Journal of Sex Research, 50(34), 247262.
Fessler, D. M., Pillsworth, E. G., & Flamson, T. J. (2004). Angry men and
disgusted women: an evolutionary approach to the influence of emo-
tionsonrisktaking.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision
Processes, 95(1), 107123.
Fleischman, D. S., Hamilton, L. D., Fessler, D. M., & Meston, C. M.
(2015). Disgust versus lust: exploring the interactions of disgust and
fear with sexual arousal in women. PLoS One, 10(6), e0118151.
Gettler, L. T., McDade, T. W., Feranil, A. B., & Kuzawa, C. W. (2011).
Longitudinal evidence that fatherhood decreases testosterone in hu-
man males. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,
108(39), 1619416199.
Glasman, L. R., & Albarracin, D. (2006). Forming attitudes that predict
future behavior: a meta-analysis of the attitude-behavior relation.
Psychological Bulletin, 132(5), 778822.
Haidt, J., McCauley, C., & Rozin, P. (1994). Individual differences in
sensitivity to disgust: a scale sampling seven domains of disgust
elicitors. Personality and Individual Differences, 16(5), 701713.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(94)90212-7.
Jones, B. C.,Feinberg, D.R., Watkins, C. D., Fincher, C. L., Little, A. C.,
& DeBruine, L. M. (2013). Pathogen disgust predicts womenspref-
erences for masculinity in mens voices, faces, and bodies.
Behavioral Ecology, 24(2), 373379.
Lee, A. J., Dubbs, S. L., Von Hippel, W., Brooks, R. C., & Zietsch, B. P.
(2014). A multivariate approach to human mate preferences.
Evolution and Human Behavior, 35(3), 193203.
Lippa, R. A. (2009). Sex differences in sex drive, sociosexuality, and
height across 53 nations: testing evolutionary and social structural
theories. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38,631651.
Little, A. C., DeBruine, L. M., & Jones, B. C. (2011). Exposure to visual
cues of pathogen contagion changes preferences for masculinity and
symmetry in opposite-sex faces. Proceedings of the Royal Society of
London B: Biological Sciences, 278(1714), 20322039.
Mazur, A., & Michalek, J. (1998). Marriage, divorce, and male testoster-
one. Social Forces, 77(1), 315330.
McIntyre, M., Gangestad, S. W., Gray, P. B., Chapman, J. F., Burnham, T.
C., O'Rourke, M. T., & Thornhill, R. (2006). Romantic involvement
often reduces mens testosterone levelsbut not always: the moder-
ating role of extrapair sexual interest. Journal of Personality and
Social Psychology, 91(4), 642651.
Mortensen, C. R., Becker, D. V., Ackerman, J. M., Neuberg, S. L., &
Kenrick, D. T. (2010). Infection breeds reticence: the effects of dis-
ease salience on self-perceptions of personality and behavioral
avoidance tendencies. Psychological Science, 21(3), 440447.
National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention
(2011). 10 ways STDs impact women differently from men. Atlanta,
GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
OShea, K.J., DeBruine, L.M., & Jones, B.C. (in press). Further evidence
for associations between short-term mating strategy and sexual dis-
gust. Personality and Individual Differences.
Penke, L., & Asendorpf, J. B. (2008). Beyond global sociosexual orien-
tations: a more differentiated look at sociosexuality and its effects on
courtship and romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and
Social Psychology, 95(5), 11131135.
Pliner, P., & Hobden, K. (1992). Development of a scale to measure the
trait of food neophobia in humans. Appetite, 19,105120.
Schaller, M., Miller, G. E., Gervais, W. M., Yager, S., & Chen, E. (2010).
Mere visual perception of other peoples disease symptoms facili-
tates a more aggressive immune response. Psychological Science,
21,649652. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610368064.
Schaller, M., & Murray, D. R. (2008). Pathogens, personality, and culture:
disease prevalence predicts worldwide variability in sociosexuality,
extraversion, and openness to experience. Journal of Personality
and Social Psychology, 95(1), 212221.
Schmitt, D. P. (2005). Sociosexuality from Argentina toZimbabwe: A 48-
nation study of sex, culture, and strategies of human mating.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28(02), 247275.
Schmitt, D. P. (2003). Universal sex differences in the desire for sexual
variety: tests from 52 nations, 6 continents, and 13 islands. Journal
of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(1), 85104.
Stevenson, R. J., Case, T. I., & Oaten, M. J. (2011). Effect of self-reported
sexual arousal on responses to sex-related and non-sex-related dis-
gust cues. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40(1), 7985.
Tybur, J. M., & Gangestad, S. W. (2011). Mate preferences and infectious
disease: theoretical considerations and evidence in humans.
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological
Sciences, 366(1583), 33753388.
Tybur, J. M., Lieberman, D., & Griskevicius, V. (2009). Microbes, mat-
ing, and morality: Individual differences in three functional domains
of disgust. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,97, 103
122. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0015474.
Tybur, J. M., Lieberman, D., Kurzban, R., & DeScioli, P. (2012). Disgust:
evolved function and structure. Psychological Review, 120,6584.
Tybur, J. M., Bryan, A. D., Magnan, R. E., & Hooper, A. E. C. (2011).
Smells like safe sex: olfactory pathogen primes increase intentions
to use condoms. Psychological Science, 22(4), 478480.
Evolutionary Psychological Science
... Women's mate preferences are influenced by their mating strategies that are nested within ecological conditions (Del Giudice et al., 2015;Kaplan & Lancaster, 2003;Little et al., 2011;Little et al., 2007;Marcinkowska et al., 2019;Voland, 1998), such as harsh environments (Little et al., 2007) and pathogen prevalence (Al-Shawaf et al., 2019;Lee & Zietsch, 2015;Watkins et al., 2012). Availability of resources can serve as cues in determining which strategy is optimal, such as considering choosing a partner who is highly investing over a partner who displays good genetics (Little et al., 2007;Quinlan, 2007). ...
... Our study also relied on a between-subjects design for mating strategy across ecological conditions. Previous studies (Al-Shawaf et al., 2019;Thomas & Stewart-Williams, 2018) have shown that ecological conditions can affect mating at the strategy level, such as using short-and long-term mating preferences as a within-subjects condition as opposed to a between-subjects condition. Future work may want to consider if women adjust their mating strategy preferences (short-term vs. long-term) when facing a harsh ecology. ...
Article
Full-text available
Ecological conditions provide information about available resources for one’s environment. In humans, this has been shown to influence reproductive behavior, as individuals may engage in trade-offs between partner quality and investment. For instance, many women may trade-off preferences for men with physical features indicative of social dominance and health over physical features indicative of commitment and investment. The current study explored women’s preferences for formidable men under safe vs. harsh ecological conditions. Across three studies, U.S. university women ( N = 1,098) were randomly assigned to a perceived harsh or safe ecological condition. They were asked to rate the attractiveness of men’s body types (i.e., muscular vs. less muscular). Findings revealed that in general, women rated stronger men as more attractive than weaker men irrespective of the ecological condition. Evidence for preference as a function of ecology appeared only when a two-alternative forced-choice task was used (Study 3), but not in rating tasks (Studies 1 and 2). Study 3 showed that women had a relatively stronger preference for stronger men for short-term relationships in a resource scarce ecological condition. This research provides some evidence that perceived ecological conditions can drive women’s preferences for men with enhanced secondary sex characteristics as a function of mating context. These findings are consistent with previous research indicating the importance of physical characteristics in men’s attractiveness, and it adds to the existing literature on ecological factors and mating preferences.
... Disgust likely evolves as a behavioral immune system reaction to avoid contagion risk (Crosby et al., 2019;Hlay et al., 2021;Koleva et al., 2012;Oaten et al., 2009). However, maladapted disgust reactions are a potential cause of sexual problems through decreasing individuals' sexual desire, sexual arousal, and increasing sexual avoidance (Al-Shawaf et al., 2019;Crosby et al., 2019;Fleischman et al., 2015). In fact, research has found an association between disgust and sexual problems, especially in women (de Jong et al., 2013). ...
Article
Sexual problems are common complaints across countries and cultures, and behavioral immune system theory suggests disgust plays an essential role in sexual functioning. The current study investigated 1) if disgust induced by sexual body fluids would reduce sexual arousal, reduce the likelihood of sexual engagement, and enhance disgust toward subsequent erotic stimuli, and 2) if the administration of ginger would affect these reactions. We administered either ginger or placebo pills to a sample of 247 participants (Mage = 21.59, SD = 2.52; 122 women) and asked them to complete either behavioral approach tasks with sexual body fluids or with neutral fluids. Next, participants viewed and responded to questions concerning erotic stimuli (nude and seminude pictures of opposite-sex models). As expected, the sexual body fluids tasks induced disgust. The elevated disgust induced by sexual body fluids tasks resulted in lower sexual arousal in women, whereas ginger consumption counteracted this inhibiting effect of disgust on sexual arousal. Disgust elicited by sexual body fluids also increased disgust toward the subsequent erotic stimuli. Ginger increased sexual arousal toward the erotic stimuli in both men and women who had completed the neutral fluids tasks. Findings provide further evidence of the role of disgust in sexual problems, and, importantly, that ginger may improve the sexual function of individuals via its sexual arousal-enhancing effect.
... One body of literature emphasizes that psychological adaptations are generally species-or sextypical (e.g., see Tooby & Cosmides, 1990). This "universal" perspective would seem to suggest that, given the appropriate contextual inputs, most men could engage in either committed or uncommitted mating (e.g., ; see also Al-Shawaf et al., 2018). On this view, we might not expect the effects of lumbar curvature and back arching to vary as a function of men's SOI-R scores; we might observe effects of context but not sociosexual orientation. ...
Article
Despite progress in attractiveness research, we have yet to identify many fitness-relevant cues in the human phenotype or humans’ psychology for responding to them. Here, we test hypotheses about psychological systems that may have evolved to process distinct cues in the female lumbar region. The Fetal Load Hypothesis proposes a male preference for a morphological cue: lumbar curvature. The Lordosis Detection Hypothesis posits context-dependent male attraction to a movement: lordosis behavior. In two studies (Study 1 N: 102, Study 2 N: 231), we presented men with animated female characters that varied in their lumbar curvature and back arching (i.e., lordosis behavior). Irrespective of mating context, men’s attraction increased as lumbar curvature approached the hypothesized optimum. By contrast, men experienced greater attraction to lordosis behavior in short-term than long-term mating contexts. These findings support both the Lordosis Detection and Fetal Load Hypotheses. Discussion focuses on the meaning of human lordosis and the importance of dynamic stimuli in attractiveness research.
... This research is among the first to highlight that sexual arousal may play a central role in human mating plasticity and strategy activation. Several studies have shown that short-and long-term mating motivations change in response to evolutionary relevant cues such as sex ratio (Arnocky et al., 2016), pathogen prevalence (Al-Shawaf et al., 2019), resource availability, and the need for parental care (Thomas & Stewart-Williams, 2018). However, none of these studies take into account the role of sexual arousal in mating strategy plasticity. ...
Article
Full-text available
Individual differences in men’s short-term mating interest are well studied, both at state and trait levels. Yet, the role of sexual arousal as a source of intra-individual variation has been neglected. This research represents the first attempt to integrate sexual arousal into the human mate plasticity literature. We argue that sexual arousal directly impacts the short-term mating motivation among men regardless of their personality, relationship status, and sociosexuality. Across four experiments, we found that heightened sexual arousal consistently increased men’s short-term mating motivation relative to participants in neutral and arousing control groups. Experiments 1 and 2 revealed that sexual arousal increased participants’ general short-term mating motivation and their preference for a short-term relationship over a long-term one. Experiment 3 replicated the findings of the first two experiments whilst also demonstrating that this effect was not moderated by personality (i.e., Dark Triad, Big Five) or relationship status. Heightened sexual arousal also led to decreased “state” long-term mating motivation. Finally, Experiment 4 showed that sexual arousal increased the participants’ preference for a short-term relationship over a long-term one, an effect that was not moderated by sociosexuality. Together, the results suggest that sexual arousal has a powerful effect on men’s short-term mating motivation, and that this effect is independent of intrasexual differences in personality, relationship status, and sociosexuality.
... The present research suggests overall trends across samples, as well as notable inter-population variation. In general, much of the disgust literature is based on university student participants (Al-Shawaf, Lewis, Ghossainy, & Buss, 2018;Al-Shawaf, Lewis, Alley, & Buss, 2015;Al-Shawaf & Lewis, 2013;Batres & Perrett, 2020;Borg & de Jong, 2012;Clay, Terrizzi, & Shook, 2012;Fessler & Navarrete, 2004;Lieberman, Tybur, & Latner, 2012;Reid et al., 2012;Stevenson et al., 2012;Tybur et al., 2009Tybur et al., , 2010, or online samples Debruine, Jones, Tybur, Lieberman, & Griskevicius, 2010;Fessler, Eng, & Navarrete, 2005;O'Shea et al., 2019;Sevi et al., 2018), with some of the online samples limited to the US (Navarrete & Fessler, 2006;Tybur et al., 2009Tybur et al., , 2015. Importantly, very few of these studies report the ethnicity, nationality, or geographic breakdown of the participants. ...
Article
Restricted sociosexuality has been linked to sexual disgust, suggesting that decreasing sexual behavior may be a pathogen avoidance technique. Using the behavioral immune system framework, which posits that humans experience disgust after exposure to pathogen cues, we replicate and expand on previous studies by analyzing the influence of three domains of disgust (sexual, moral, pathogen) on psychological (desire and attitude) and behavioral domains of sociosexuality (SOI) in four diverse samples: American university students (n = 155), Salvadoran community members (n = 98), a global online sample (n = 359), and a four-country online sample (US, India, Italy, and Brazil; n = 822) collected during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. In contrast with previous studies, we account for shared variance in sexual, pathogen, and moral disgust by entering all three in a multiple regression to predict composite SOI. In both large samples, sexual disgust and pathogen disgust had opposing effects on composite SOI; that is, higher sexual disgust and lower pathogen disgust were associated with more restricted composite SOI. Additionally, we constructed a multi-group structural equation model (SEM) to determine the impact of each domain of disgust on each domain of SOI across all our samples simultaneously, while controlling for age and sex. Within this model we also assessed how the psychological domains of SOI – attitude and desire – mediate the relationship between disgust and sociosexual behavior. Pathogen disgust positively predicted SOI attitude and desire, but not behavior, consistently across all groups. SOI behavior was only predicted by pathogen disgust when mediated by SOI attitude, again across all groups, suggesting that behavior seems to be driven largely by the psychological facets of SOI. We discuss these findings in light of the behavioral immune system and the bet-hedging hypothesis, which make opposing predictions on the relationship between infection risk and sexual behavior.
... However, the disgust system is proposed to have been co-opted to also respond to and avoid biologically costly sexual partners (sexual disgust) and social transgressions (moral disgust; Tybur et al., 2013). These three domains are distinguished by inputs that activate them, their behavioral outputs, and unique correlates (Al-Shawaf et al., 2019). ...
Article
Full-text available
Disgust is a cross-culturally recognized emotion that is characterized by avoidant or cautious tendencies. Accordingly, greater sensitivity to disgust may be related to less willingness to take risks. Relatively little research has examined the association between disgust sensitivity and risk-taking propensity. Further, no research to date has taken a domain specific approach to understanding the association between these constructs. Across two studies (N1=98, N2=390) and a mini-meta analysis utilizing two additional datasets (total N=1981), we assessed the extent to which domain specific disgust sensitivity (i.e., Pathogen, Sexual, and Moral) were related to domain specific risk-taking propensity (i.e., Social, Recreational, Health/Safety, Ethical, and Financial). We conducted two cross-sectional studies, with a community and a student sample. Participants completed surveys that included measures of disgust sensitivity and risk-taking propensity. Bivariate correlations across the two studies indicated that greater disgust sensitivity was related to lower risk-taking propensity across almost all domains. However, when controlling for covariance among the disgust sensitivity domains, regression analyses suggested variability in the association between disgust sensitivity and risk-taking propensity depending on domains. Based on mini meta-analysis, sexual disgust sensitivity had the strongest relationships with social risk-taking propensity and health/safety risk-taking propensity, and moral disgust sensitivity had the strongest relationship with ethical risk-taking propensity. These findings suggest the presence of domain specific relations between disgust sensitivity and risk-taking propensity. The domain specific focus may help in utilizing disgust as a factor to decrease certain risky behaviors (e.g., moral disgust for decreasing plagiarism).
Article
Full-text available
Investigations on mate choice in humans frequently report preferences, but there is little knowledge about what is important for rejection by a potential mate. The present study aims to verify if facial asymmetry and facial disharmony have an influence on mate rejection by men. We hypothesized that more asymmetric and disharmonious faces would be more rejected. For this purpose, photographs of women’s faces were presented in pairs by self-declared heterosexual men. It was requested they reject one of the faces as a potential mate for a long-term relationship. Women’s faces were also analyzed to measure facial asymmetry and facial disharmony. We used a linear mixed model to evaluate the effect of the cited metrics on each face’s number of rejections. We found that the female metrics influenced mate rejection only if associated with male age and income. The older participants rejected female partners with asymmetric faces. We suggest that aging makes men more demanding in mate choices, at least considering facial asymmetry. We concluded that rejection could be a key variable in mate choice studies, but further research is needed to clarify its effects.
Article
Full-text available
Types of disgust guide individuals to seek healthier mates and avoid risky sexual behaviors. However, research integrating the relationships between types of disgust and mating is still lacking. Through three studies either measuring types of disgust together (Study 1, N1 = 335, China) or separately (Study 2, N2 = 233, China; Study 3, N3 = 267, the Netherlands), we found that after controlling for shared variances, higher pathogen disgust was associated with a stronger preference for physical attractiveness. Higher sexual disgust was associated with lower short-term but higher long-term mating orientation. Higher moral disgust was associated with higher long-term mating orientation and a stronger preference for mate commitment. In Study 3, we also measured perceived norms surrounding short-term and long-term mating. Results showed that though both types of mating behavior were considered approved by their social groups, participants perceived long-term mating as more so. Moreover, sexual disgust was negatively associated with perceived approval of short-term mating. Finally, we performed mega-analyses collapsing the data from three studies. Current research provides evidence that different types of disgust play a role in specific aspects of mating psychology.
Article
Disgust is an avoidant emotion which repulses from potentially dangerous stimuli and situations. Operating in a social context, disgust may prevent from engaging in an unrestricted sociosexuality and from violating moral norms. Meanwhile, people high in dark personality traits prefer short-term mating strategy and exhibit a tendency to transgress moral standards. Thus, it might be assumed that they should have decreased both moral and sexual disgust. In a preregistered study (N = 450; 52 % female) we tested our assumptions by examining the relationships between Dark Triad, vulnerable narcissism, and disgust sensitivity in moral and sexual domains. We also asked whether higher psychopathy and Machiavellianism in men would explain sex discrepancy in sexual disgust sensitivity. The results confirmed most of our hypotheses and showed that a) sexual and moral disgust are consistently, negatively correlated with all Dark Triad traits; b) there are considerable sex differences in sexual disgust and psychopathy; and c) increased psychopathy in men partially explains their lower sexual disgust sensitivity comparing to women. This study has taken a novel perspective in this research area, and may indicate the role of decreased disgust sensitivity in transgressing social norms by individuals high in dark personality traits.
Article
The current research tested the hypothesis that an increase in perceived disease vulnerability would create more feelings of disgust and a reduced willingness to help persons with dissimilar attitudes. To test these hypotheses, two studies were performed. In the first study, 173 university undergraduates indicated their willingness to help a target person who held similar or dissimilar attitudes. Then the participants’ feelings of disgust about helping, and perceived vulnerability to disease were measured. In the second study, 127 university undergraduates read materials designed to make a disease threat or a non-disease threat salient then indicated their willingness to help a target person with similar or dissimilar attitudes. As predicted a concern about disease and attitude similarity interacted to influence willingness to help and this effect was mediated by feelings of disgust.
Book
Full-text available
Evolutionary Psychology: The New Science of the Mind, 6th edition. Contains a major update of the past 4 years of research on topics ranging from mating to murder, from cooperation to status hierarchies. https://www.amazon.com/Evolutionary-Psychology-New-Science-Mind/dp/1138088617/ref=dp_ob_image_bk
Article
Full-text available
Women have consistently higher levels of disgust than men. This sex difference is substantial in magnitude, highly replicable, emerges with diverse assessment methods, and affects a wide array of outcomes—including job selection, mate choice, food aversions, and psychological disorders. Despite the importance of this far-reaching sex difference, sound theoretical explanations have lagged behind the empirical discoveries. In this article, we focus on the evolutionary-functional level of analysis, outlining hypotheses capable of explaining why women have higher levels of disgust than men. We present four hypotheses for sexual disgust and six for pathogen disgust, along with testable predictions. Discussion focuses on additional new hypotheses and on future research capable of adjudicating among these competing, but not mutually exclusive, hypotheses.
Article
Full-text available
Sexual arousal is a motivational state that moves humans toward situations that inherently pose a risk of disease transmission. Disgust is an emotion that adaptively moves humans away from such situations. Incongruent is the fact that sexual activity is elementary to human fitness yet involves strong disgust elicitors. Using an experimental paradigm, we investigated how these two states interact. Women (final N=76) were assigned to one of four conditions: rate disgust stimuli then watch a pornographic clip; watch a pornographic clip then rate disgust stimuli; rate fear stimuli then watch a pornographic clip; or watch a pornographic clip then rate fear stimuli. Women's genital sexual arousal was measured with vaginal photoplethysmography and their disgust and fear reactions were measured via self-report. We did not find that baseline disgust propensity predicted sexual arousal in women who were exposed to neutral stimuli before erotic content. In the Erotic-before-Disgust condition we did not find that sexual arousal straightforwardly predicted decreased image disgust ratings. However, we did find some evidence that sexual arousal increased self-reported disgust in women with high trait disgust and sexual arousal decreased self-reported disgust in women with low trait disgust. Women who were exposed to disgusting images before erotic content showed significantly less sexual arousal than women in the control condition or women exposed to fear-inducing images before erotic content. In the Disgust-before-Erotic condition the degree of self-reported disgust was negatively correlated with genital sexual arousal. Hence, in the conflict between the ultimate goals of reproduction and disease avoidance, cues of the presence of pathogens significantly reduce the motivation to engage in mating behaviors that, by their nature, entail a risk of pathogen transmission.
Article
Full-text available
Evolutionary psychologists have hypothesized that men and women possess both long-term and short-term mating strategies, with men's short-term strategy differentially rooted in the desire for sexual variety. In this article, findings from a cross-cultural survey of 16,288 people across 10 major world regions (including North America, South America, Western Europe, Eastern Europe, Southern Europe, Middle East, Africa, Oceania, South/Southeast Asia, and East Asia) demonstrate that sex differences in the desire for sexual variety are culturally universal throughout these world regions. Sex differences were evident regardless of whether mean, median, distributional, or categorical indexes of sexual differentiation were evaluated. Sex differences were evident regardless of the measures used to evaluate them. Among contemporary theories of human mating, pluralistic approaches that hypothesize sex differences in the evolved design of short-term mating provide the most compelling account of these robust empirical findings.
Article
Full-text available
Recent studies suggest that pathogen-related factors may contribute to systematic variation in women's preferences for masculinity in men's faces. However, there is very little evidence for similar correlations between pathogen-related factors and women's preferences for masculinity in other domains (e.g., men's voices or bodies). Consequently, we conducted a series of studies to examine whether pathogen disgust (assessed using Tybur et al's Three Domains of Disgust Scale) predicts individual differences in women's preferences for masculine characteristics in men's voices, bodies, and faces. We also tested if pathogen disgust predicts individual differences in measures of women's actual mate choices in the same way. We observed positive correlations between women's pathogen disgust and their preferences for masculinity in men's voices (Study 1) and faces and bodies (Study 2). We also observed positive correlations between women's pathogen disgust and their masculinity ratings of both their current and ideal romantic partners (Study 3). Each of these correlations was independent of the possible effects of women's sexual and moral disgust. Together, these findings suggest that individual differences in pathogen disgust predict individual differences in women's masculinity preferences across multiple domains and may also predict individual differences in their actual mate choices.
Article
Full-text available
Evolutionary approaches to the emotions have traditionally focused on a subset of emotions that are shared with other species, characterized by distinct signals, and designed to solve a few key adaptive problems. By contrast, an evolutionary psychological approach (a) broadens the range of adaptive problems emotions have evolved to solve, (b) includes emotions that lack distinctive signals and are unique to humans, and (c) synthesizes an evolutionary approach with an information-processing perspective. On this view, emotions are superordinate mechanisms that evolved to coordinate the activity of other programs in the solution of adaptive problems. We illustrate the heuristic value of this approach by furnishing novel hypotheses for disgust and sexual arousal and highlighting unexplored areas of research.
Article
Full-text available
Evolutionary psychologists have hypothesized that men and women possess both long-term and short-term mating strategies, with men's short-term strategy differentially rooted in the desire for sexual variety. In this article, findings from a cross-cultural survey of 16,288 people across 10 major world regions (including North America, South America, Western Europe, Eastern Europe, Southern Europe, Middle East, Africa, Oceania, South/Southeast Asia, and East Asia) demonstrate that sex differences in the desire for sexual variety are culturally universal throughout these world regions. Sex differences were evident regardless of whether mean, median, distributional, or categorical indexes of sexual differentiation were evaluated. Sex differences were evident regardless of the measures used to evaluate them. Among contemporary theories of human mating, pluralistic approaches that hypothesize sex differences in the evolved design of short-term mating provide the most compelling account of these robust empirical findings. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)
Article
Al-Shawaf et al. (2015, Evolution & Human Behavior, 36, 199–205) found that people who were more interested in pursuing a short-term mating strategy (indexed by higher total scores on the Revised Sociosexual Orientation Inventory) reported less sexual disgust (indexed by lower scores on the sexual disgust subscale of the Three Domain Disgust Scale). By contrast with these results for sexual disgust, Al-Shawaf et al. (2015) observed no significant associations between interest in pursuing a short-term mating strategy and moral or pathogen disgust. This pattern of results, wherein sociosexuality correlates with lower sexual disgust but is unconnected to disgust more generally, may indicate specific cognitive adaptations that counter the possible disgust responses associated with engaging in short-term mating. Here we replicated Al-Shawaf et al.'s (2015) findings for sexual disgust and sociosexual orientation in a large sample (N = 7166). Although we found that individuals who were more interested in pursuing a short-term mating strategy reported significantly lower moral disgust, these relationships were very weak. Together, these results suggest a robust relationship between disgust and short-term mating that is relatively specific to sexual disgust.
Article
An evolutionary task analysis predicts a connection between disgust and human mating, two important but currently disconnected areas of psychology. Because short-term mating strategies involve sex with multiple partners after brief temporal durations, such a strategy should be difficult to pursue in conjunction with high levels of sexual disgust. On this basis, we hypothesized that individuals with a stronger proclivity for short-term mating would exhibit dispositionally lower levels of sexual disgust. Two independent studies provided strong support for this hypothesis: among both men and women, an orientation toward short-term mating was associated with reduced levels of sexual disgust, but not with suppressed moral or pathogen disgust. Our discussion highlights an unexpected finding and suggests important questions for future research.