Experiment FindingsPDF Available

Issue 10 www.jetir.org (ISSN-2349-5162) JETIR1810873 Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (JETIR) www.jetir.org 592 (east). Mumbai 400093. Thadomalshahani engineering colleg

Authors:

Abstract

Trains are the major source of transport in Mumbai. It also causes noise pollution which may have a negative impact on health such as hearing impairment, sleep deprivation and low concentration. These side effects have adverse impact on students' academic performance. For the present study, twenty volunteers were selected and they were divided into control and experimental groups. The volunteers from experimental group were from locality near to the station, whereas volunteers from control group live far from that station area. The health condition of the volunteers was recorded normal. The participants were instructed to follow a strict sleep pattern. The present study shows the disturbing pattern of sleep in experimental group. Sleep deprivation may cause stress, negative impact on working capacity and academic performance. Present investigation suggests that improvement is required in nearby area of the station to reduce the impact of noise.
© 2018 JETIR October 2018, Volume 5, Issue 10 www.jetir.org (ISSN-2349-5162)
JETIR1810873
Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (JETIR) www.jetir.org
592
Noise Pollution of Local Train and its Impact on
Students Residing Nearby Railway Station
Dr. Leena Muralidharan, Dr. Sangeeta Gaur, *Chinmay Muralidharan
V. K. K. Menon College of Commerce and S.S. Dighe College of Science,Bhandup (east). Mumbai 400093.
Thadomalshahani engineering colleg ,Bandra. Mumbai 50.
ABSTRACT
Trains are the major source of transport in Mumbai. It also causes noise pollution which may have a negative impact on health
such as hearing impairment, sleep deprivation and low concentration. These side effects have adverse impact on students’
academic performance. For the present study, twenty volunteers were selected and they were divided into control and
experimental groups. The volunteers from experimental group were from locality near to the station, whereas volunteers from
control group live far from that station area. The health condition of the volunteers was recorded normal. The participants were
instructed to follow a strict sleep pattern. The present study shows the disturbing pattern of sleep in experimental group. Sleep
deprivation may cause stress, negative impact on working capacity and academic performance. Present investigation suggests that
improvement is required in nearby area of the station to reduce the impact of noise.
KEYWORDS: Noise impact, health, train, students
INTRODUCTION
India is a developing country and industrialization is a key to its growth. When industrialization develops in a country,
more traffic load is added which is resulting in high level of environmental noise 1. Things are easy and better now. Due to
transportation any distance is no more count as distance. Beside these time saving and positive effects of transportation there is a
negative effect which also exists. More and more noise is produced by these industries, machinery andespecially train transport.
Noise is known as air pollutant 2. Noise from train transport is responsible to noise annoyance 3. Definition of environmental
noise is “any unwanted or harmful outdoor sound created by human activities” 4. The National Institute on Deafness 5 and Other
Communication Disorders, define noise as “Long or repeated exposure to sound at or above 85 decibels can cause hearing loss.”
Transport has significant effect on environment as well as on life of individuals 6. Trains are the major cause of noise
pollution, it causes uncomfortable environment for the people who lives in the nearby railways 7. According to Bhattacharya et.
al.,when train enters and leave the station it honks on the sound level 100 db 8. The main causes of noise pollution from train are
noise due to wheel movement, horn, and noise in tunnel 8. During interaction between wheel and railway track rolling, impact and
curve squeal are the three types of noise are produced. Less than 1000 Hz frequencies are produced by impact noise whereas
curve squeal noise contains large frequency 125 to 500 Hz 9. Heng found maximum noise by train was near the vertical directions
and it was found to be decreased by approximately 10 dB in horizontal direction 10. Significant noise on high rise flat was also
observed by Chui et. al. 1. The present paper suggests the effects of noise on health.This also has a significant role for authorities
from transport planning and land use planning.
MATERIALS AND METHOD
Experimental study was conducted on the noise level produced by train near the railway track behind V. K. Krishna Menon
College of Commerce and Economics and Sharad Shankar Dighe College of Science, Mumbai and theadverse impact of train
noise on student’s academic performance. Noise levels were assessed near Bhandup railway station(east) and within college
premises. Noise by train is recorded by digital sound level meter/ dB meter. The measurements were done with sound meter at Hi-
© 2018 JETIR October 2018, Volume 5, Issue 10 www.jetir.org (ISSN-2349-5162)
JETIR1810873
Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (JETIR) www.jetir.org
593
range which for this meter is 60 dB to 130 dB. The sound level measurements were carried out for six months continuously.
Sound measurements were carried out during day time inside the college premises and on different time period near Bhandup
station.
Twenty volunteers were selected for the study. They were divided into control and experimental groups (Ten of each). In
healthy condition they maintain normal sleeping pattern. They are not addicted by any tobacco product. The body mass index of
the entire volunteer was in normal range. The participants were instructed to follow a strict sleep pattern. For this they have to
sleep at 11 pm every night and wake up at 7 am each morning during test period. The volunteer from experimental group were
from locality near to the station, whereas the control group consist the volunteers who live far from that station area.
Data were expressed as mean ± SEM., or as percentages (relative numbers) for categorical variables. The response of
experimental group was compared with control group.
(Figure1) Map showing the study area
RESULT AND DISCUSSION
Our finding shows that noises produced by train are responsible for increased number awaking in night. An increased
risk was observed among those students living in areas with the near railway station. In present study it was observed that student
volunteer from experimental group experienced more harmful effect as compare to their control group peers. The 90% student of
experimental group shows sleep deprivation, whereas in control group sleep deprivation was observed only in 10% students.
Stress was observed in 70% students in experimental group, whereas 15% students suffered from stress in control group. In
experimental group annoyance was recorded in 100% students, whereas only 5% students from control group shows annoyance.
Negative impact on academic performance was observed in 70% students (experimental group), whereas 20% students from
control group shows negative impact on working capacity. Sleepiness during day time was observed in 90% volunteers from
experimental group, whereas it was observed 25% in control group (Table 1, Figure 2).
(Table 1) Negative impact of train noise on students performance
Symptoms
Sleep
deprivation
Stress
Negative
impact on
working
capacity
Sleepiness
during day
time
Experimental
90 %
70 %
100 %
70 %
90 %
Control
10 %
15 %
5 %
20 %
25 %
© 2018 JETIR October 2018, Volume 5, Issue 10 www.jetir.org (ISSN-2349-5162)
JETIR1810873
Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (JETIR) www.jetir.org
594
(Figure 2) Impact of train noise on different criteria
Sound level was recorded 88.05556 ± 0.248817 on the time of train arrival at the railway station. 88.55556 ± 0.166121
sound scales were observed when train leave the station. Train horn noise was observed 107.8333 ± 0.325897 at the station (Table
2).
(Table 2) Train noise at Bhandup station
Sr. No.
Sound level in dB when train
arrives on station (Mean ±
SEM)
Sound level in dB when
train leave the station
(Mean ± SEM)
Sound level in dB when
train horn honks (Mean ±
SEM)
1
88.05556 ± 0.248817
88.55556 ± 0.166121
107.8333 ± 0.325897
Health is a most valuable thing for humans. According to WHO 11 definition of health is "Health is a state of complete
physical, mental, and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity." Noise has negative effect on sleep
pattern, it also has an impact on heart rate during sleep and it may be responsible for cardiovascular disease 12, 13, 14. Exposure to
transportation noise showed negative health effects in children and adults 15. Stress is caused by noise and this stress is
responsible for many health problems 16. In present study sleep disturbance, negative impact on working capacity was observed in
students of experimental group it may be due to biological changes by noise. Halprin 17 suggests that noise in night induced
biological changes in the form of stress and these changes affect sleep pattern and quality. Findings of Babisch 12 also suggest that
noise has negative effects on the concentration, relaxation or sleep. Noise exposure may harm the intellectual abilities of students
16. Daytime sleepiness and tiredness, annoyance, stress, was observed in present study which is supported by Halperin’s 17
finding. Noise is known as a psychological stressor that activates the endocrine system 12, 18. In control group low percentage of
noise impact was observed this may be due to noise generated by vehicles on road or community noise 19.
Noise produced by train can be reduced by different mechanisms such as building and technical noise arrangements.
These arrangements can be of following type:
Regular maintenance of the railway track
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Sleep
deprivation
Stress
annoyance
Hypertension
Negative
impact on
working
capacity
Sleepiness
during day
time
Impact of Train Noise on Different criteria
Experimental
Control
© 2018 JETIR October 2018, Volume 5, Issue 10 www.jetir.org (ISSN-2349-5162)
JETIR1810873
Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (JETIR) www.jetir.org
595
Application of modern types of crossing points and switches
Brakes in train with an anti-slip device, new brake materials
Noise enclosure or Noise barrier can be implemented near railway track
By using these mechanisms it would be possible to reduce the noise level 20.
In present research work negative impact of train noise was observed in students which significantly affect their working capacity.
The present study suggests that improvement is needed in the railway station near the study area / residential area to reduce the
impact of noise.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors warmly thank the V. K. Krishna Menon College of Commerce and Economics and Sharad Shankar Dighe
College of Science, Mumbai and all the students who participated in this study.
REFERENCES
1. Chui H.T., Raymond B.W. Hengand Ng K.Y. Study of traffic noise levels in Singapore. Proceedings of Acoustics 3-5
November 2004. Gold Cost. Australia.
2. Tiwari A.V., Kadu P.A. and Mishra A.R. Study of noise pollution due to railway and vehicular traffic at level crossing
and its remedial measures. AJER; 2013; 2(4): 16-19.
3. Sung J.H., Lee J., Jeong K.S., Lee S., Lee C., Jo M. and Sim C. Influence of transportation noise and noise sensitivity on
annoyance: a cross-sectional study in South Korea. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health; 2017; 14(3): 322
4. Directive 2002/49/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 June 2002. Relating to the Assessment and
Management of Environmental Noise. Official journal of europian communities; 2002; L189/12-L189/25.
5. National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders. Noise induced hearing loss. Available from: URL:
https:// www.nidcd.nih.gov/health/noiseinduced- hearing-loss. Accessed May 9, 2016.
6. Nassiri P., Heidari H., Khadem M, Rahimifard H. and Rostami E. Assessment of noise annoyance and its effects on
healthcare staff based on sound pressure level and annoyance scale. Int. J. Occup. Hygiene; 2014; 6(1): 23-30.
7. Demir G., Kablan A, Alyüz Ü, Ökten H. E. and Yalçın S. Railway noise pollution prevention in terms of regulations:
case study of Istanbul. IJESD; 2016; 7(3): 2016198-2016202.
8. Bhattacharya O., Nandi S. and Banerjee D. Effect of noise on people residing near railway tracks and working in railway
station. Ergonomics for Rural Development; 2015; 182-188.
9. Soeta Y. and Shimokura R. Survey of interior noise characteristics in various types of trains. Applied Acoustics; 2013;
74; 1160-1166.
10. Heng C. C. Vertical directivity of train noise. Applied Acoustics; 1997; 51(2): 157-168.
11. WHO. Constitution of the World Health Organization, World Health Organization, Geneva; 1948.
12. Babisch W. Transportation noise and cardiovascular risk: Updated review and synthesis of epidemiological studies
indicate that the evidence has increased. Noise Health; 2006; 8(30): 1-29.
13. Croy I., Smith M.G., PerssonWaye K. Effects of train noise and vibration on human heart rate during sleep: an
experimental study. BMJ Open; 2013; 3(5): 1-9.
14. Kamp I.V., Waye K.P. and Gdlöf-Gunnarsson A. The effects of noise disturbed sleep on childrens? Health and cognitive
development. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America; 2013; 133(5): 3506.
© 2018 JETIR October 2018, Volume 5, Issue 10 www.jetir.org (ISSN-2349-5162)
JETIR1810873
Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (JETIR) www.jetir.org
596
15. Tiesler C.M.T., Birk M., Thiering E., Kohlbock G., Koletzko S., Bauer C., Berdel D., Berg A., Babisch W., Heinrich
J. and GINI plus and LISA plus Study Groups. Exposure to road traffic noise and children’s behavioural problems and
sleep disturbance :results from the GINI plus and LISA plus studies. Environ. Res.; 123; 1-8.
16. Smith A.P. Noise and health: why we need more research. INTERNOISE 13-16. Noise and Sustainability, Lisbon,
Portugal, 13-16 June 2010. INCE InterNoise Conference Proceedings. Indianapolis. Institute of Noise Control
Engineering; 2010; 2641-2647.
17. Halperin D. Environmental noise and sleep disturbances: A threat to health? Sleep Sci.; 2014; 7(4): 209-212.
18. Babisch W. The noise/stress concept, risk assessment and research needs. Noise Health; 2002; 4(16): 1-11.
19. KalshettyB. M. and Karalatti B.I. Study on noise pollution of industrialized and urbanized towns like Rabakavi and
Banahatti of Bagalkot district, Karnataka state, India. I.J.S.N.; 2013; 4(4): 668-672.Pultznerová A. and Ižvolta L.
Structural modifications, elements and equipment for railway noise reduction. XXIII R-S-P seminar, Theoretical
Foundation of Civil Engineering (23RSP) (TFoCE 2014). Procedia Engineering; 2014; 91: 274-279.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
Environmental noise is known to cause noise annoyance. Since noise annoyance is a subjective indicator, other mediators—such as noise sensitivity—may influence its perception. However, few studies have thus far been conducted on noise annoyance in South Korea that consider noise sensitivity and noise level simultaneously. The aim of this study was to evaluate the correlations between noise sensitivity or noise level and noise annoyance on a large scale in South Korea. This study estimated the level of noise exposure based on a noise map created in 2014; identified and surveyed 1836 subjects using a questionnaire; and assessed the impact of transportation noise and noise sensitivity on noise annoyance. The result showed that noise exposure level and noise sensitivity simultaneously affect noise annoyance, and noise sensitivity has a relatively larger impact on noise annoyance. In conclusion, when study subjects were exposed to a similar level of noise, the level of noise annoyance differed depending on the noise sensitivity of the individual.
Article
Full-text available
Environmental noise, especially that caused by transportation means, is viewed as a significant cause of sleep disturbances. Poor sleep causes endocrine and metabolic measurable perturbations and is associated with a number of cardiometabolic, psychiatric and social negative outcomes both in adults and children. Nocturnal environmental noise also provokes measurable biological changes in the form of a stress response, and clearly affects sleep architecture, as well as subjective sleep quality. These sleep perturbations are similar in their nature to those observed in endogenous sleep disorders. Apart from these measurable effects and the subjective feeling of disturbed sleep, people who struggle with nocturnal environmental noise often also suffer the next day from daytime sleepiness and tiredness, annoyance, mood changes as well as decreased well-being and cognitive performance. But there is also emerging evidence that these short-term effects of environmental noise, particularly when the exposure is nocturnal, may be followed by long-term adverse cardiometabolic outcomes. Nocturnal environmental noise may be the most worrying form of noise pollution in terms of its health consequences because of its synergistic direct and indirect (through sleep disturbances acting as a mediator) influence on biological systems. Duration and quality of sleep should thus be regarded as risk factors or markers significantly influenced by the environment and possibly amenable to modification through both education and counseling as well as through measures of public health. One of the means that should be proposed is avoidance at all costs of sleep disruptions caused by environmental noise.
Article
Full-text available
Transportation of goods on railways is increasing and the majority of the increased numbers of freight trains run during the night. Transportation noise has adverse effects on sleep structure, affects the heart rate (HR) during sleep and may be linked to cardiovascular disease. Freight trains also generate vibration and little is known regarding the impact of vibration on human sleep. A laboratory study was conducted to examine how a realistic nocturnal railway traffic scenario influences HR during sleep. Case-control. Healthy participants. 24 healthy volunteers (11 men, 13 women, 19-28 years) spent six consecutive nights in the sleep laboratory. All participants slept during one habituation night, one control and four experimental nights in which train noise and vibration were reproduced. In the experimental nights, 20 or 36 trains with low-vibration or high-vibration characteristics were presented. Polysomnographical data and ECG were recorded. The train exposure led to a significant change of HR within 1 min of exposure onset (p=0.002), characterised by an initial and a delayed increase of HR. The high-vibration condition provoked an average increase of at least 3 bpm per train in 79% of the participants. Cardiac responses were in general higher in the high-vibration condition than in the low-vibration condition (p=0.006). No significant effect of noise sensitivity and gender was revealed, although there was a tendency for men to exhibit stronger HR acceleration than women. Freight trains provoke HR accelerations during sleep, and the vibration characteristics of the trains are of special importance. In the long term, this may affect cardiovascular functioning of persons living close to railways.
Article
Full-text available
Undisturbed sleep is essential for physiological and psychological health. Children have a special need for uninterrupted sleep for growth and cognitive development. Noise is an environmental factor that affects most children. In addition to noise in schools and preschools, many are exposed to potentially disturbing traffic related noise at night. The knowledge of how children's health, wellbeing and cognitive development is affected by noise disturbed sleep due to road traffic is very incomplete. Nor do we know how children are able to handle noisy situations (coping) and if a learned noise-related behavior in the long term has a negative influence on children's health and learning. The need for a restorative home environment can be particularly important when the child is simultaneously exposed to noise in the school environment. Moreover, it has been shown that although children are less sensitive for awakenings and sleep cycle shifts due to nighttime exposure, they are more sensitive for physiological effects such as blood pressure reactions and related motility during sleep. This paper aims to review existing knowledge on how children's health and cognitive development are affected by noise in the home and school environment, with special focus on the importance of noise-disturbed sleep.
Article
Full-text available
Background: Exposure to transportation noise showed negative health effects in children and adults. Studies in children mainly focussed on aircraft noise at school. Objectives: We aimed to investigate road traffic noise exposure at home and children's behavioural problems and sleeping problems. Methods: 872 10-year-old children from Munich from two German population-based, birth-cohort studies with data on modelled façade noise levels at home and behavioural problems were included. Noise was assessed by the day-evening-night noise indicator Lden and the night noise indicator Lnight. Behavioural problems were assessed by the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). A subgroup (N=287) had information on sleeping problems. Continuation ratio models (logistic regression models) adjusted for various covariates were applied to investigate the association between interquartile range increases in noise and SDQ scales (sleeping problems). Results: Noise measured by Lden at the most exposed façade of the building was related to more hyperactivity/inattention (continuation odds ratio (cOR)=1.28(95%-confidence interval(CI):1.03-1.58). Noise at the least exposed façade increased the relative odds for having borderline or abnormal values on the emotional symptoms scale, especially the relative odds to have abnormal values for a subject with at least borderline values (Lden:cOR=2.19(95% CI:1.32-3.64). Results for Lnight were similar. Nocturnal noise at the least exposed façade was associated with any sleeping problems (odds ratio (OR)=1.79(95% CI=1.10-2.92)). Conclusions: Road traffic noise exposure at home may be related to increased hyperactivity and more emotional symptoms in children. Future longitudinal studies are required to explore noise exposure and behavioural problems in more detail, especially the role of sleep disturbances.
Article
Full-text available
This paper will examine research on noise and health and suggest new topics and methods of investigation. First, it will discuss noise exposure and argue that new approaches need to be considered. Secondly, it will examine possible underlying mechanisms and show that it is inappropriate to use stress as a model for effects of noise on health. The next section will suggest that it is important to examine combined effects of noise and other risk factors rather than considering noise in isolation. Similarly, the importance of individual differences will be emphasized and the need for an objective measure of noise sensitivity discussed. Finally, a new model of an effect of noise on health will be presented. This will be based on the speculation that exposure to noise in childhood may reduce intelligence which will not only have an effect on cognitive functioning but will increase the risk of future health problems.
Article
The aim of this paper is to determine the effects of the wheel-rail friction, motor and tires on noise characteristics in a train car. The octave-band power levels, A-weighted equivalent continuous sound pressure level and parameters extracted from interaural cross-correlation/autocorrelation functions were analyzed to evaluate the noise inside running train cars quantitatively and qualitatively. The three types of noise caused by wheel-rail interaction are rolling, impact, and curve squeal noises. Impact noises had larger components at lower frequencies (< 1000 Hz). Curve squeal noises had larger components at frequencies between 125 and 500 Hz in both underground and surface trains and had dominant frequency components around 250 and 500 Hz with stronger pitch in underground trains. High-speed trains had low-frequency centroids and high binaural coherence compared with normal-speed trains.
Article
Field measurements on train noise were made at about 6 m from the nearest rail with the intention of determining the vertical directivity of the train noise. Standard wheels are used in the transit system. The track where the measurements were taken is at grade and with no parapet walls. The experimental data showed that the major noise source is from the wheel/rail interaction zone. It was found that the train noise was maximum near the vertical and decreased by about 10 dB in the horizontal direction. This vertical directivity pattern has not been accounted for by various analytical models proposed so far. The study also indicates that a vehicle skirt may be a useful control measure to reduce train noise spreading to nearby highrise buildings.
Article
In principle, the noise/stress hypothesis is well understood: Noise activates the pituitary-adrenal-cortical axis and the sympathetic-adrenal-medullary axis. Changes in stress hormones including epinephrine, norepinephrine and cortisol are frequently found in acute and chronic noise experiments. The catecholamines and steroid hormones affect the organism's metabolism. Cardiovascular disorders are especially in focus for epidemiological studies on adverse noise effects. However, not all biologically notifiable effects are of clinical relevance. The relative importance and significance of health outcomes to be assessed in epidemiological noise studies follow a hierarchical order, i.e. changes in physiological stress indicators, increase in biological risk factors, increase of the prevalence or incidence of diseases, premature death. Decision-making and risk management rely on quantitative risk assessment. Epidemiological methods are the primary tool for providing the necessary information. However, the statistical evidence of findings from individual studies is often weak. Magnitude of effect, dose-response relationship, biological plausibility and consistency of findings among studies are issues of epidemiological reasoning. Noise policy largely depends on considerations about cost-effectiveness, which may vary between populations. Limit or guideline values have to be set within the range between social and physical well-being - between nuisance and health. The cardiovascular risk is a key-outcome in non-auditory noise effects' research because of the high prevalence of related diseases in our communities. Specific studies regarding critical groups, different noise-sources, day/evening/night comparisons, coping styles and other effect-modifying factors, and the role of annoyance as a mediator of effect are issues for future research in this field.