Content uploaded by Sanita Fejzic
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Sanita Fejzic on Dec 14, 2018
Content may be subject to copyright.
SANITA FEJZIĆ
179
Nicole Crozier’s
Strip Fit
Collages: Cutting into a New Vision of
Female Beauty and Power
Toronto-based mixed media artist Nicole Crozier builds on a long tradition of collage, assemblage
and found art which has revolutionized the art world since the twentieth-centur y. She cuts
and fragments images from popular fashion magazines as acts of exploration and subversion.
Interested in the fashion model’s function as a commodity mannequin, part of a capitalist matrix
of sexual desire and the semantics of consumption, Crozier ’s Strip Fit series of collages provide
viewers with a fragmented record of Western conceptions of female beauty.
Haute couture is a culture of excess that entangles and confuses female power with
consumer power. Nicole’s work unsettles and tears apart an industry that constructs ideals of
female beauty through the production of advertising. In this economic model, advertisements are
money; they are power. By cutting, extracting, layering, lighting up and photographing fragments
of these magazine ads that she has found or that have been passed on to her, Crozier blurs the
lines between the marketing industry and the production of art.
The models in these magazines represent highly stylized sites of narrative power. They
emphasize the seductive and sell more than clothing: they provoke feelings and desires; they
organize value systems that at once glorify a certain type of body while manufacturing a universal
kind of beauty sellable to as many women as possible. While not every woman can buy a Chanel
dress, Coco Mademoiselle is a perfume targeted to the middle-class consumer. Protability drives
the industry’s shift toward featuring more aordable items such as accessories and make-up lines
in their advertisements. The particular smell of the perfume or shade of eyeshadow is not as
important as the power of the brand.
The world created by these advertisements, then, is one in which the middle-class
consumer agrees to leap into a luxury lifestyle which excludes her and, paradoxically, seduces her
and invites her to participate in it vicariously through the purchase of cheap(er) product lines. This
outsider-insider tension sustains her desire to be part of a bigger franchise: the jet-set world of
celebrities and wealthy public gures that attend the catwalks she can glimpse in magazines and on
the screen but not attend in person. In a system that manufactures a perpetual lack of satisfaction
symptomatic of the consumerist impulse for more—always more in search of a morphing ideal—
we nd the blueprints of an unsustainable model of endless production.
Never mind the social and environmental devastation caused by the ready-to-wear
industry that produces thousands of low-quality outts per season, many of which are thrown in
the garbage when not sold, or discarded by consumers shortly thereafter. The fashion industr y
has been synonymous with excess for a long time; it is now being read, measured and talked
about in terms of waste. It produces tons of garbage, literally. According to a 2017 article, “more
than 15 million tons of used textile waste is generated each year in the United States” (The Balance).
H&M, Zara, Club Monaco, Forever 21 and others like them produce clothing that ends up in the
dump faster than ever before: “an average American throws away approximately 80 pounds of
used clothing per [year]” (The Balance). Crozier’s collages cut through the excess and dump of
SANITA FEJZIĆ
180
the fashion industry in favour of a new and polyphonic vision of female beauty and power: by
subverting and sabotaging the advertising industry’s intent to conate self with product; by re-
image-ining women’s relationships with the living organic environment around them; by inserting
what I call “moments of poetry” into advertisements as a way of celebrating their artistic potential.
Scritch, dimensions variable, Digital Inkjet Print.
In “Scritch,” for example, the fragmented models, featured in the centre of the image,
produce an eect of multiplicity: these are the eyes and arms of not one, but many women.
Tightly choreographed for unity, however, Crozier has picked women wearing pink sweaters. Pink
is not just a colour, explains Veronika Koller. It is a marker in visual communication for gender and
sexuality. Beyond its cliché connotations with heterosexual femininity and feminine homosexuality
(associated with gay men in particular) “and its stereotypical features, such as softness and delicacy,
with childhood and innocence as well as with vanity and articiality” (396), Koller’s study suggests
SANITA FEJZIĆ
181
pink also tips into negative connotations such as naiveté, stupidity and cheapness (404).
Inthiscollage,“theeectsoflowsaturation”provokeasensefemininityassociatedtothe
“subtleandtender”(KressandVanLeeuwenqtdinKoller413).Indeed,tendernessisalsowritten
inthechoiceoffabric,knittedwoolsweaters.Asmanyfeministscholarshavenoted,knitting,a
domesticactivityusuallyassociatedwitholdergenerations,hasseenarevivalamongWestern
feministandqueercircles(Myzelev;Pentney;Kelly).Here,Ireadtheknittedsweaterasametaphor
ofunitingmultiplicities.Inmyqueerandfeministreadingof“Scritch,”thepinksweatersrepresenta
weavingtogetherofdierentagenciestocreateafragmentedwhole.
Weseethisrstofallinthelayeringofmultiplewomenintoasinglebody.Theeectis
uncanny.Itsuggeststhatidentityisakintoassemblage.Indeed,fashionadvertisementspresent
women’sclothingandaccessoriesaslifestylesforpurchase.Thisisnotspecictothefashionworld;
advertisingmakesdesirableavarietyofproducts,frombeertocars,byusingwomen’sbodiesas
gatewaystosellinganemotionormoodassociatedwithanidentity.In“Scritch,”facesandbodies
areentangled,mouldingandmorphingintoanamorphouscollageofawomanmadeupofmany
women.Whereasadvertisementssellspecicfacesandproductsinaglobaleconomyofprêt-à-
porteridentities,Crozier’scollageresistsandsubvertstheimages’capitalisticintent.Bydoingso,
shereorganisesvaluesystemsandrewritesnarrativesofwhatisdesirable.
Neoliberalismsustainsthebeautymythbyconfusingrelationshipswomenhavewith
themselves,eachother,andtheorganic,livingworldaroundthem.Thefashionindustry,among
others,hascreatedwhatsomescholarscall“aestheticentrepreneurs”bycoercingwomento
maintainaconstantstateofvigilanceabouttheirappearance(Aesthetic Labour: Rethinking Beauty
Politics in Neoliberalism55-60;317-322).Undertheself-governingmodelofneoliberalism,girls
andwomenareencouragedintoanunforgivingformofself-surveillance:fromourclothestoour
weightandheight,everypartofus,includingourverysubjectivity,hasbeencolonizedbythe
neoliberalbeautymyth.
Crozier’s“Scritch”bringsattentiontothewayouridentitiesareshapedbytheimages
weseeofotherwomen,whetherit’sinfashionmagazines,television,socialmedia,fashionblogs,
do-it-yourselfYouTubevideos,orappsthatmonitorourfoodintake,tolistbutafew.Bylayering
women’sfacestogetherinanewcontext,Crozier ’sworkalsogesturestowardsisterhoodoutside
ofheteropatriarchalandneoliberalsystems.Herhybridizingofidentitiesandintimaciesbetween
womenisnotforthemalegaze.Womendonotcompetewitheachotherforattentionhere.They
arenotsellinganything.Thisisnotabeautypageant.Thisisasceneinwhichwomen’sidentities
collapseandmergeintoone;amoment,also,inwhichwewitnessawomantenderlyplacingher
armsaroundherbodyinasymbolicgestureofcaringforherselfoutsideofthewoman-product
andwoman-consumerdialectic.
SANITA FEJZIĆ
182
Left: Snick, dimensions variable, Digital Inkjet Print. Right: SpiderLash, dimensions variable, Digital
Inkjet Print
Importantly, the introduction of leaves and branches in “Scritch” suggests the living
environment has agency in women’s bodies and lives. Usually, the focus in fashion images is placed
on the model and the products. Here, however, three dimensional natural elements literally stand
out of the source collage and give the nal photograph its depth. Crozier ’s “Snick” and “SpiderLash”
also decentralize the model’s face in favour of images of the natural world. Here, images of leaves
and twigs mould and morph with the women’s faces.
In “Snick,” we see the portrait of a hybrid woman who stands somewhere between human
and natural world. Building on Donna Haraway’s “A Cyborg Manifesto,” a founding posthumanist
text that blurs boundaries between human, animal, the natural world and machine in favour
of coalition through anity, I suggest Crozier’s “Scritch,” “Snick,” and “SpiderLash” create poetic
moments that gesture toward transcorporeality. By transcorporeality, a term coined by Stacey
Alaimo, I mean that our bodies are situated in a material world that is porous and amorphous,
SANITA FEJZIĆ
183
made of constant interactions and exchanges between various bodies, including our own.
The idea that our bodies are made up of other bodies—other living organisms such as
bacteria, for example—is relatively commonplace. Alaimo reminds us that our bodies are open-
ended systems in an interdependent and interconnected world made up of other open-ended
systems. Nothing is completely self-contained in our deeply material reality. Indeed, Crozier’s
emphasis on natural elements in her collages reminds us that we live in a stubbornly material
world.
In “SpiderLash,” for example, I read Crozier’s use of colour as a metaphor for
transcorporeality. The dark green jacket blends with images of big fan-shaped leaves with
outstanding foliage and various green textures. Similarly, the twig that covers her face appears to
be of a lighter shade of purple found on the trim and belt of the jacket. This blending between
human and plant life through colour re-organizes value systems and priorities. Whereas in adverts,
the focus is on selling products, here the primary concern is on women’s relation to the living world
around them. This discovery is a moment of poetry that shows us the artistic potential in fashion
advertising.
There are many small moments of poetry in Crozier’s collages through which we become
sensitive to our vulnerability as women on the one hand, and our power and transcorporeal beauty
on the other. While fashion advertisements objectify and commodify women by bringing them
into a neoliberal system of values, Crozier’s “Scritch,” “Snick,” and “SpiderLash” subvert their source
materials’ commercial aim and open up spaces in which women can redene their relationships
toward themselves, each other and the living organic world around them. Urgently, we have to
begin thinking of the fashion industry in material terms: take hairspray, for example, which causes
holes in the ozone layer, as Aliamo reminds us. What do we, as women, value more? Shaping our
hair to t some trending notion of beauty manufactured by an industry that does not care about
its impact on the world? Not as consumers, but as women, how do we take responsibility for our
wellbeing and that of others, including the living world around us?
We cannot simply consider the ways in which fashion orders our subjectivity and
appearance, or the way it entangles us in a capitalist exchange of goods. We must consider the
ways in which the fashion industry is harming other living systems that we are interconnected with,
including our atmosphere, water systems and land. Crozier’s collages demand that we confront
the fashion world within a material reality. Indeed, the very process of found art, collage and
assemblage and its physicality remind us that we cannot disentangle our actions from their impact
on the material world.
SANITA FEJZIĆ
184
References
Alaimo, Stacy. Bodily Natures: Science, Environment, and the Material Self. Indiana University
Press, 2010.
Elias, A. S., et al., editors. Aesthetic Labour: Rethinking Beauty Politics in Neoliberalism.
Palgrave MacMillan, 2017.
Kelly, Maura. “Knitting as a feminist project?” Women’s Studies International Forum, vol. 44,
2014, pp. 133-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2013.10.011.
Koller, Veronika. “‘Not just a Colour’: Pink as a Gender and Sexuality Marker in Visual
Communication.” Visual Communication, vol. 7, no. 4, 2008, pp. 395-423. http://
journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1470357208096209.
Leblanc, Rick. “Textile Recycling Facts and Figures.” The balance small business, 29 Dec. 2017,
www.thebalancesmb.com/textile-recycling-facts-and-gures-2878122.Accessed29
May 2018.
Myzelev, Alla. “Whip Your Hobby into Shape: Knitting, Feminism and Construction
of Gender.” Textile, vol. 7, no. 2, 2009, pp. 148-163. www.tandfonline.com/doi/
abs/10.2752/175183509X460065.
Pentney,BethAnn.“Feminism,activism,andknitting:Arethebreartsaviablemodefor
feminist political action?” thirdspace: a journal of feminist theory & culture, vol. 8,
no. 1, 2008. http://journals.sfu.ca/thirdspace/index.php/journal/article/view/
pentney/210.