Predict or prophesy? Issues and trade-offs in modelling long-term transport infrastructure demand and capacity

To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the authors.


Effective planning and investment for transport infrastructure systems is seen as key for economic development in both advanced and developing economies. However, planning for such strategic transport investments is fraught with difficulties, due to their high costs and public profile, long asset life, and uncertainty over future transport demand patterns and technologies. Given that only a finite quantity of funding is available for transport investment, it is important that this funding is spent in the right places and on the right schemes in order to ensure that the best return is obtained from limited public resources. There is therefore a need for a model which is capable of assessing network demand and performance in a wide range of possible futures, in order that robust decisions can be taken with regard to which schemes are given the go ahead. This paper discusses a range of issues associated with the development of a strategic national transport model for Great Britain as part of a wider interdependent infrastructure systems modelling framework (NISMOD). It considers the compromises which have to be made in order to develop a model which can examine a wide range of potential futures in a reasonable timescale, outlines how such futures can be captured in the model, and finally assesses the continued role of planners and policy-makers in determining both how the model is applied and how the future of transport systems might play out in reality. While the paper is based on a case study example from Great Britain, most of the general issues discussed are of relevance to transport and infrastructure policy making in almost any national or international context.

No full-text available

Request Full-text Paper PDF

To read the full-text of this research,
you can request a copy directly from the authors.

... This will increase the private car occupancy rate. Similarly, history showed that there was a sharp decline in international maritime passenger transport caused by the emergence of mass-market aviation in the 1950s [90]. Technological improvement of engine, tires, transmissions, air-conditioning, catalytic converter, and materials can also instigate uncontrolled uncertainties of the projected results. ...
... The policy of vehicle scrappage might be implemented in Metro Manila in the future and can also affect vehicle lifespan, on-road vehicle stock, and new vehicle sales. Population and economic changes and technological progress are exogenous changes, while policy changes are endogenous changes [90]. The future transport demand is at high levels of uncertainty, and there is an urgent need for accurate modeling of future travel demand and capacity [90]. ...
... Population and economic changes and technological progress are exogenous changes, while policy changes are endogenous changes [90]. The future transport demand is at high levels of uncertainty, and there is an urgent need for accurate modeling of future travel demand and capacity [90]. ...
An increase in private vehicle fleet and usage exacerbates the overuse of petroleum products, air quality degradation, and public health risks, among other drawbacks. This study investigated the energy and environmental benefits for private passenger vehicles under various scenarios in Metro Manila, the Philippines. The findings are informative to design policy implications for energy and environmental benefits. The study applied the Gaussian copula-based multinomial logit (MNL)-linear regression to develop the household vehicle ownership and energy consumption model using the disaggregated data of 1,795 households collected in 2017. The simulated vehicle fleet and energy consumption were then adopted to extrapolate energy demand, emissions, and public health risks for a 2010–2050 horizon using the bottom-up approach. Under the baseline scenario, the energy demand and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions will reach 5.45 million tonnes of oil equivalent (Mtoe) and 16.93 million tonnes (Mt) in 2050, respectively. The amounts of hydrocarbon (HC), carbon monoxide (CO), sulfur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen oxides (NOX), particulate matter 10 (PM10) and particulate matter 2.5 (PM2.5) emissions, and economic loss of health risks will be 6,214 tonnes (t), 62,136 t, 536 t, 10,550 t, 1,348 t, 996 t, and 237 Million USD, respectively, under the baseline scenario in 2050. Improvement of accessibility significantly reduces energy demand and CO2 emissions. Introduction of Euro 6 cars and Euro 4 buses and Public Utility Jeepneys noticeably improves public health. The new tax schedules on gas and vehicle maximize the tax revenue. The integration of all the mentioned alternatives can achieve sustainable mobility and urbanization.
... A large-scale transport-transit system is presented in the form of graphs representing ordered pairs, such as the restriction of the sets of peaks (airport, railway, car, bicycle stations and other terminals) and the restriction of the sets of arcs (transport lines between different terminals) [10]. ...
... The task is posed as follows. It is required for as short a time as possible to approximately distribute flows on the network while simultaneously obtaining a "density" of movement on each arc that minimizes the functionality [10]. ...
... Metz (2012) reports substantial decline in car use in London as rail and cycling infrastructure have been developed. Demographic change sits alongside, economic change, global fossil-fuel costs, and climate change in a transport demand model produced by Blainey and Preston (2019) which results in 504 different possible future scenarios. Transport is also an example of an infrastructure where the relationship is two-way, whereby development can drive demographic change at a local level. ...
Full-text available
The size, composition, and spatial distribution of both people and households have a substantial impact on the demand for and development and delivery of infrastructure required to support the population. Infrastructure encompasses a wide range of domains including energy, transport, and water, each of which has its own set of spatial catchments at differing scales. Demographic projections are required to assess potential future demand; however, official projections are usually not provided at a high level of spatial resolution required for infrastructure planning. Furthermore, generating bespoke demographic projections, often incorporating a range of scenarios of possible future demographic change is a specialist, resource intensive job and as such is often missing from infrastructure development projects. In this paper we make the case that such demographic projections should be at the heart of infrastructure planning and present a set of open‐source models which can be used to undertake this demographic projection work, thus providing the tools needed to fill the identified gap. We make use of a case study for the United Kingdom to exemplify how a range of scenarios can be assessed using our model.
... The availability of financial resources due to the high costs is another challenge that potentially blocks the implementation of new projects. Although we underlined the essential role of spatial planning and infrastructure provision, these measures are usually especially costly (Blainey and Preston, 2019;Leibowicz, 2018). Furthermore, as the budgets are generally limited, high costs can lead to competition between different interest groups, lobbying efforts and other stakeholders (Banister, 2005). ...
Full-text available
In order to achieve emission reduction targets in the passenger transport sector, the demand side and especially the mobility behavior of consumers deserve special attention. It is unlikely that such behavior will change without significant political intervention, nor will single policy instruments be sufficient to induce the needed changes. In this study, therefore, we analyze the design of so-called disruptive policy packages required to drastically reduce passenger transport emissions in industrialized countries and illustrate it for the case of Austria. Our research approach consists of three methods: a literature review to develop a policy category system, expert interviews to build effective policy packages and a stakeholder workshop to identify the specific needs of different geographical areas. For the design of successful policy packages, we identify two critical dimensions, disruptiveness (having high-level and rapid effectiveness) and implementability. A well-balanced combination of diverse policy instruments is required to adequately address both dimensions.
... To the extent of uncertainty imposed by urban mobility trends as regards the interaction of the transport sector with other sectors, transport modelling can be multi-sectoral/cross-sectoral, which means to consider other related sectors e.g. environment, energy, economy and consult national/international studies of economies, in order to identify and investigate future impacts, while perceiving travelling in time-dependent terms [12,14,15]. Examples of interaction areas include: interactions with the energy sector as electric vehicles are emerging, interactions with the public health sector from air pollution and active travel, interactions with society in terms of equity issues emerging from transport interventions. ...
Urban mobility is subject to deep changes, imposed by technological advancements and new concepts of operation in transport and serious challenges on urban space are expected to be introduced. Transport modelling should follow the urban mobility trends to connect the new arrays of demands and the new services they will provide, guiding future mobility. The integration of urban mobility trends into mobility planning, through the 8 principles and the 4 phases of Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans (SUMPs) to support policy goals, is essential, as well. Modelling the complexity and uncertainty enforced by the urban mobility trends necessitate a move from common modelling techniques? How to accomplish a transition in mobility planning shifting from conventional and static planning approaches? Are current transport modelling approaches able to integrate urban mobility trends, to fulfil SUMP’s implementation? Traditional planning and modelling methods cannot face the challenges of urban mobility trends integration. Long-term planning, collaborative and participatory planning processes, co-creation of scenarios for the future and measure packages using specialized tools on the one hand, multi-sectoral and dynamic modelling approaches, the Big Data potentials on the other hand, are cases of on-going research for transport planning and modelling new requirements respectively, identified through an extensive literature review. The integration of transport modelling requirements, in the urban policy cycle is anticipated to guarantee the reliability of the modelled scenarios, ensure the accuracy of modeling outcomes and offer guidance on how to accomplish the integration of data-driven methods in participatory and collaborative planning approaches.
... As an industry that needs intensive capital investment, hydrogen refueling stations would be underutilized at the early introduction of FCVs, which means the hydrogen infrastructure networks need a great deal of investment and a long payback period [36,37]. According to a research, the total costs of a new hydrogen refueling station with a daily capacity of 200 kg of hydrogen is at least 2 million USD [38], which will take 10e15 years to completely recover both the operating costs and capital expenditures [39]. ...
Fuel Cell Vehicles are considered as a promising alternative for future sustainable transportation, while the deployment of hydrogen refueling stations is one of the major barriers that blocking the commercial introduction of Fuel Cell Vehicles. Since the establishment of hydrogen infrastructures not only requires quite a large investment, but also needs efficient project management and operation. Therefore, how to finance and operate hydrogen infrastructures is a difficult question for decision makers. In this study, it introduced four business models for financing and operating hydrogen refueling stations: Build-Operate-Transfer, Transfer-Operate-Transfer, Public-Private-Partnership, and Asset- Backed Securitization, and identified six criteria for prioritizing them. Then, it employed Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process to determine the weight for the criteria, and compared the performance of these models with respect each criterion. Finally, the method of Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluations was used to determine the priority of each model for financing hydrogen refueling stations, and a Sensitivity Analysis was conducted to find the most appropriate model in different situations. The results indicated that financing difficulty, project risks, and financing costs are the most important factors for strategic investors to involve in financing hydrogen refueling stations. Among the four financing models, Public-Private-Partnership and Transfer-Operate-Transfer models are turned out to be more preferable for financing hydrogen infrastructure in China. Some policy implications have also been provided for the establishment of hydrogen refueling stations.