ArticlePDF Available

EmPATH Units as a Solution for Emergency Department Psychiatric Patient Boarding

Authors:

Abstract

In the efforts to solve the nationwide problem of psychiatric patients boarding long hours, untreated, in medical emergency departments, a new and effective model — the “emPATH unit” — has emerged nationally in recent years, now boasting state-of-the-art facilities in multiple states. Combining the soothing, home-like and supportive atmosphere of the community crisis clinic with the ability to accept even the most acute psychiatric patients, emPATH units report substantial improvements in outcomes, safety, and patient satisfaction, while dramatically reducing the need for coercive measures, decreasing episodes of agitation and physical restraints, and diverting unnecessary psychiatric hospitalizations, all at substantially lower costs than the status quo.
2/26/2018 emPATH Units as a Solution for ED Psychiatric Patient Boarding - Print Article
https://www.psychiatryadvisor.com/empath-units-as-a-solution-for-ed-psychiatric-patient-boarding/printarticle/687420/ 1/3
emPATH units report substantial improvements in
outcomes, as well as safety and patient satisfaction,
while dramatically reducing the need for coercive
measures.
Scott Zeller, MD
September 07, 2017
emPATH Units as a Solution for ED Psychiatric
Patient Boarding
Share this content:
facebook
twitter
linkedin
google
Email
Print
Patients with acute mental health issues stuck languishing for long
hours, sometimes days, in medical emergency departments (ED)
awaiting psychiatric disposition continue to be a major problem
across the United States1. Many observers suggest the problem is
due to a shortage of inpatient psychiatric beds. However, it should be
noted that emergency psychiatric conditions may be the only cases
presenting to EDs for which the default treatment is ‘admit to
inpatient', and if this were also true for any other emergency
condition (such as chest pain), all medical beds of hospitals would
likely be full as well. It has been demonstrated that the great majority
of psychiatric emergencies, like other medical emergencies, can be
resolved in less than 24 hours with prompt, appropriate intervention2
— thus it would make sense to try to treat mental health crises in
emergency settings as well.
However, resolving those symptoms in the standard ED can be a
complicated task. The ED can be a frightening or agitating
environment for patients in a mental health crisis, as they are often restrained to gurneys, or stuck in corners or cubicles guarded by a
sitter, amid police and ambulance personnel, flashing lights, loud noises and hectic activity, and the cries of nearby others in pain.
Paranoid or anxious patients, who might benefit from extra space or the ability to move about, may instead be restricted to a small,
confined area. It has long been recognized that the standard ED setting may actually exacerbate the symptoms of a psychiatric crisis.3
Continue Reading Below
Those suffering from acute psychiatric conditions will understandably do better in more calming, supportive settings with trained
psychiatric personnel. However, until recently in most parts of the country, such environments have only been possible within
inpatient psychiatric wards (perhaps after a long wait in an ED) or in community-based crisis programs. The community crisis clinics,
however, are typically limited to lower-acuity clients, and exclude patients with aggression, dangerousness, acute suicidality,
substance intoxication or withdrawal, vital signs abnormalities or other medical concerns.
As a result, mental health patients with the most severe and urgent symptoms are, ironically, often the most under-served behavioral
health population.
Fortunately, a new and effective model — the “emPATH unit” — has emerged nationally in recent years, now boasting state-of-the-
art facilities in multiple states. Combining the soothing, home-like and supportive atmosphere of the community crisis clinic with the
ability to accept even the most acute psychiatric patients, emPATH units report substantial improvements in outcomes, safety, and
patient satisfaction, while dramatically reducing the need for coercive measures, decreasing episodes of agitation and physical
restraints, and diverting unnecessary psychiatric hospitalizations, all at substantially lower costs than the status quo.4
2/26/2018 emPATH Units as a Solution for ED Psychiatric Patient Boarding - Print Article
https://www.psychiatryadvisor.com/empath-units-as-a-solution-for-ed-psychiatric-patient-boarding/printarticle/687420/ 2/3
emPATH unit stands for “emergency Psychiatric Assessment, Treatment & Healing unit,” and as the acronym implies, is modeled on
empathetic, rather than coercive, care. These are hospital-based outpatient programs which can promptly accept all medically-
appropriate patients in a psychiatric crisis, even those on involuntary psychiatric detention. Rather than being an alternative-to-
inpatient destination for ED mental health patients, the emPATH unit is the destination for all the ED's acute mental health patients, a
place where disposition decisions are typically not made until after a thorough psychiatric evaluation, treatment, and an observation
period in the recuperative unit setting.
emPATH units can be widely diverse in their designs, staffing and floor plans, but all follow several basic tenets:
1.The programs feature a large, comfortable central room or ‘milieu' where all patients are situated. Rather than individual
beds or rooms, in this short-term outpatient program each patient is provided their own recliner or ‘sleeper' chair, which can be
positioned upwards for joining in socialization or group therapy, or folded flat if one wishes to take a nap. Recliners are arranged to
maximize personal space, and there is also ample room on the unit for those patients who wish to walk about, pace or meditate; some
units even feature a safe outdoor retreat. Stations with snacks, beverages, and linens are accessible to patients without needing to
involve the staff. There are opportunities to read books or periodicals, watch TV, play board games, or chat privately with a therapist
or peer support counselor.
The large milieu room is optimally airy, with high ceilings, windows, and ambient light. Soft colors and peaceful murals adorn the
walls. The entire atmosphere is one of calming and healing, where needs can be met, frustrations are minimized, and therapeutic
interventions can be allowed the time and space to be effective.
Some might question why patients would be all together in the milieu rather than the more traditional emergency psychiatry strategy
of individual rooms, perhaps also wondering if highly-acute patients might be more likely to become combative when among other
patients. But for a person in crisis, human interaction can be very beneficial, while an individual room can seem bleak and cell-like,
with little hope for recovery.
For example, a person who feels distraught and in despair might continue to harbor such feelings in a private room. In the ‘group
campout' environment of the milieu, however, he or she might instead be able to speak with a nearby peer about their issues, make a
new friend, or enjoy a game of dominoes, and then suddenly, things might not seem quite so bad. Similarly, even individuals with
paranoia or hostile thoughts can be soothed by the collegiality and mutual respect of the patients in the milieu setting.
2. All staff are intermingled with the patients on the milieu — there is no glass-enclosed ‘fishbowl' nursing station. Nurses,
social workers, therapists, and peer support counselors are always available and close by. Because of this of this set-up, any patient
having difficulties or escalating symptoms can be quickly assisted in a supportive and non-coercive way. Unlocked enclosed areas are
available should an individual need temporary privacy to decompress.
3. All patients see a psychiatrist as quickly as possible, and have treatment implemented promptly. It has been shown the more
early the assessment in a mental health crisis setting, the better the outcome. 5 Similarly — especially given the fact that emPATH
units, being outpatient, typically have a limit of 23 hours, 59 minutes — the best chances for a speedy recovery in the unit occur when
treatment is employed as soon as possible.
The combination of a prompt assessment and treatment with a supportive, healing environment can lead to impressive results,
especially in safety and symptom relief. emPATH units report the use of physical restraints and/or forced medications in less than 1%
of patients, even when the majority of patients are on involuntary psychiatric holds, 6 an improvement over more traditional
emergency psychiatry programs (one of which recently published physical restraint use at 14%).7 Avoidance of inpatient
hospitalization in highly-acute populations via treatment in an emPATH unit can be 75% or higher, sparing those available inpatient
beds for those who truly have no alternative. 4
emPATH units can help mental healthcare systems achieve the Triple Aim of health care —enhancing patient experience, improving
population health, and reducing costs.8 By minimizing boarding, which can cost EDs an average of $2264 per patient8, and avoiding
unnecessary hospitalizations, which can cost $8000 to$10,000 or even more, the financial benefits of an emPATH unit are clear; in
addition, these units are often able to operate self-sufficiently at far less than the costs of the status quo. And moving crisis individuals
out of the ED opens up ED beds for other medical emergency patients. Further enhancing the fiscal advantages, emPATH units can
often be created in a cost-effective way by simply remodeling available, unused hospital spaces.
Best of all, emPATH units are truly a win for mental health patients, providing swift relief and recovery for those who traditionally
have been under-served, and have too often been detained with minimal care in improper settings.
References
2/26/2018 emPATH Units as a Solution for ED Psychiatric Patient Boarding - Print Article
https://www.psychiatryadvisor.com/empath-units-as-a-solution-for-ed-psychiatric-patient-boarding/printarticle/687420/ 3/3
1. Castellucci, M. ER wait times, length of stay far longer for psychiatric patients. Modern Healthcare.
http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20161017/NEWS/161019918 October 17, 2016. Accessed August 30, 2017. .
2. Zeller SL. Treatment of psychiatric patients in emergency settings. Primary Psychiatry. 2010;17(6):41-47.
3. Garriga M, Pacchiarotti I, Kasper S, et al. Assessment and management of agitation in psychiatry: expert consensus. World J
Biol Psychiatry. 2016; 17(2):86-128.
4. Zeller S, Calma N, Stone A. Effects of a dedicated regional psychiatric emergency service on boarding of psychiatric patients
in area emergency departments. West J Emerg Med. 2014; Feb;15(1):1-6.
5. Balfour M, Tannner K, Jurica PJ, Llewellyn D, Williamson RG, Carson CA. Using lean to rapidly and sustainably transform a
behavioral health crisis program: impact on throughput and safety. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2017;43(6):275-283.
6. Zeller, SL. Data presented at the American Psychiatric Association 2017 Annual Meeting; May 22, 2017; San Diego,
California.
7. Simpson SA et al. Risk for physical restraint or seclusion in the psychiatric emergency service (PES). Gen Hosp Psychiatry.
2014; 36(1):113-8.
8. Berwick DM, Nolan TW, Whittington J. The Triple Aim: care, health, and cost. Health Aff (Millwood). 2008.
doi:10.1377/hlthaff.27.3.759
9. Nicks B, Manthey D. The impact of psychiatric patient boarding in emergency departments [published online July 22, 2012].
Emerg Med Int. 2012;2012:360308.
This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed in any form without prior authorization. Your use of this
website constitutes acceptance of Haymarket Media's Privacy Policy and Terms & Conditions
... 77,78 In another recent innovation, owing to the recognition that standard EDs may be a suboptimal environment for psychiatric emergency care, several hospitals looking to prepare for surges during the pandemic created external mental-health-only observation units, to which medically clear ED psychiatric patients could be swiftly moved for targeted care with trained personnel, thus opening up beds in the ED for nonpsychiatric emergency patients. 79,80 These programs, also known as EmPATH units (Emergency Psychiatry Assessment, Treatment and Healing units) feature a more spacious, calming, and homelike atmosphere, 81 with prompt access to psychiatric providers, and have been demonstrated to alleviate most emergency psychiatric patient conditions to subacute status in less than 24 hours; this has resulted in a reported 70% or more of individuals, who in previous protocols would have been boarding in EDs awaiting inpatient admission, instead being discharged to community levels of care, preserving the limited inpatient beds for those patients with truly no alternative to psychiatric hospitalization. 82 The authors are aware of several EmPATH units that were able to assist their affiliated EDs even further during the pandemic, and that was via moving medically stable and asymptomatic, yet COVID test-positive acute psychiatric patients out of the ED into specific isolation rooms in the EmPATH unit reserved for this purpose. ...
Article
Behavioral emergencies in the United States have been increasing, with some studies reporting a doubling in the number of people experiencing symptoms related to mental health conditions, although overall visits to US emergency departments (EDs) decreased during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. The uncertainty surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic caused many people to avoid health care facilities, including EDs, even if they may have otherwise sought emergency care, and was associated with increases in new behavioral health diagnoses. Measures to limit the spread of COVID-19 led to people limiting their in-person contact with others, likely exacerbating preexisting mental health issues.
... [13][14][15] Several approaches have been proposed to reduce boarding time of patients presenting to EDs with psychiatric emergencies. [16][17][18] One recent model is an emergency psychiatric assessment, treatment, and healing (EmPATH) unit, 19 which is an outpatient hospitalbased program that accepts ED patients in a psychiatric crisis. These units proclaim to decrease psychiatric boarding time and LOS at reduced costs compared to traditional psychiatric care. ...
Article
Full-text available
Objective: We sought to evaluate the impact of an Emergency Psychiatric Assessment, Treatment, and Healing (EmPATH) unit on emergency department (ED) revenue, psychiatric boarding time and length-of-stay (LOS). Methods: We conducted a before-and-after economic evaluation of a single academic Midwestern ED (60,000 annual visits) for all adult (≥18 years) patients before (December 2017-May 2018) and after opening (December 2018-May 2019) an EmPATH unit. These are outpatient hospital-based programs that provide emergent treatment and stabilization for mental health emergencies from ED patients. The Holt-Winters Method was used to forecast pre-EmPATH expected ED levels of patients leaving without being seen, leaving against medical advice, eloping, or being transferred using 3 years of ED visits. ED revenues were calculated by finding the difference of pre-EmPATH expected and post-EmPATH observed values and multiplying by the revenue per visit. ED boarding time and LOS were obtained from the hospital's electronic medical record. Results: There were 23,231 and 23,336 ED visits evaluated during the pre and post-EmPATH unit periods. The ED generated an estimated additional $404,954 in the 6 months and $861,065 annually after the implementation of the EmPATH unit. The median psychiatric boarding time (IQR) decreased from 212 (119-536) to 152 minutes (86-307; mean difference 189 minutes, 95%CI 150,228) and median LOS decreased from 351 (204-631) to 334 minutes (212-517; mean difference 114, 95%CI 87,143). Conclusion: The EmPATH unit had a positive impact on ED revenue and decreased ED boarding time and length of stay for psychiatric patients.
... An overall focus on avoiding coercion and causes of frustration has resulted in dramatically lower incidence of physical restraints, aggression, and assaults than more traditional units or EDs, even with a highly acute patient population under involuntary evaluation for dangerousness to self and/or others. 7 Now operating in two dozen sites around the nation, the EmPATH unit model contributes significantly to the reduction of ED overcrowding and throughput times by providing prompt transfer to an appropriate psychiatric level of care. Sites typically report 75% or higher avoidance of psychiatric hospitalizations in patients who would have been admitted in more standard ED systems. ...
Article
Full-text available
Although high-acuity psychiatric crises qualify as medical emergencies, the general hospital medical emergency department might not be the best location to care for these patients. With the close quarters of the typical ED, its strange lights and sounds, with busy uniformed personnel rushing about, this environment might be disruptive or even worsen symptoms for those suffering from paranoia, despondency, or anxiety. An alternate, hospital-level emergency setting for crisis patients would be preferable. In response, many health systems and communities nationwide have created high-acuity-capable psychiatric emergency programs. Hospital-level psychiatric emergency programs go by different names, including Psychiatric Emergency Services (PESs), Comprehensive Psychiatric Emergency Programs (CPEPs), Clinical Decision Units(CDUs), and more recently, Emergency Psychiatry Assessment, Treatment,and Healing units EmPATH unit). Along with different names, sites might even consider themselves to be a community location rather than part of a general hospital, but all could be considered to provide an EMTALA compliant, hospital-level equivalent site that can work with most patients regardless of the acuity of their symptoms. These programs can be part of a general hospital campus, or on the license of a general hospital but located away from the main hospital, or on free-standing psychiatric campuses. They differ in size, scope of services, and environment. This article describes the different major models of hospital-level psychiatric emergency programs, and discusses the benefits and challenges of each.
Article
Full-text available
SafER Space consists of a scalable framework and a transformation toolkit for implementation and sustainment, providing hospitals with a roadmap to co-design every aspect of reimagining EDs toward best, evidence-informed, mental health practices. The framework includes three-phased considerations, starting with low-cost and easily-implementable solutions (i.e., Phase 1) that advance toward Phase 3, which fully reimagines EDs.
Conference Paper
Full-text available
SafER Space consists of a scalable framework and a transformation toolkit for implementation and sustainment, providing hospitals with a roadmap to co-design every aspect of reimagining emergency departments (EDs) toward best, evidence-informed, mental health practices. The framework includes three-phased considerations, starting with low-cost and easily-implementable solutions (i.e., Phase 1) that advance toward Phase 3, which fully reimagines EDs.
Chapter
The volume of Emergency Department (ED) visits continues to rise in the United States, with 60% of ED physicians reporting that they believe the cause is an increase in psychiatric emergencies [1]. From 2006 to 2014, the rate of ED visits for mental health/substance abuse diagnoses increased by 44%, and out of all diagnosis types, ED visits with a diagnosis of suicidal ideation increased the most—by a staggering 414% [2].
Chapter
Over the last 30 years, the psychiatric approach to individuals in the emergency setting with suicidal ideation and risk factors for suicide has undergone a paradigm shift, from one favoring triage and hospitalization to one favoring treatment and hospital diversion. In the best hands, the goal has always been to collaborate with the patient in resolving the crisis and selecting the most appropriate level of care. But this new emphasis has taken over, evolving from a best practice into the standard of care.
Article
Full-text available
Background: Psychomotor agitation is associated with different psychiatric conditions and represents an important issue in psychiatry. Current recommendations on agitation in psychiatry are not univocal. Actually, an improper assessment and management may result in unnecessary coercive or sedative treatments. A thorough and balanced review plus an expert consensus can guide assessment and treatment decisions. Methods: An expert task force iteratively developed consensus using the Delphi method. Initial survey items were based on systematic review of the literature. Subsequent surveys included new, re-worded or re-rated items. Results: Out of 2175 papers assessing psychomotor agitation, 124 were included in the review. Each component was assigned a level of evidence. Integrating the evidence and the experience of the task force members, a consensus was reached on 22 statements on this topic. Conclusions: Recommendations on the assessment of agitation emphasise the importance of identifying any possible medical cause. For its management, experts agreed in considering verbal de-escalation and environmental modification techniques as first choice, considering physical restraint as a last resort strategy. Regarding pharmacological treatment, the "ideal" medication should calm without over-sedate. Generally, oral or inhaled formulations should be preferred over i.m. routes in mildly agitated patients. Intravenous treatments should be avoided.
Article
Full-text available
Urgent mental health presentations in United States emergency departments are rising in number and are a significant percentage of all emergency department visits. As federal law requires these cases to be evaluated and stabilized, or admitted for inpatient care, they can present a considerable challenge to emergency care facilities with limited resources. In response to this demand, emergency psychiatry has evolved into a subspecialty in which practitioners seek to rapidly stabilize those in psychiatric crisis in a non-coercive and collaborative manner, and ensure appropriate and safe dispositions. This article discusses different emergency care settings and models as well as the types of interventions used with patients suffering from acute symptoms of suicidal ideation, agitation, psychosis, mania, intoxication, anxiety, and other presentations.
Article
Full-text available
Introduction Mental health patients boarding for long hours, even days, in United States emergency departments (EDs) awaiting transfer for psychiatric services has become a considerable and widespread problem. Past studies have shown average boarding times ranging from 6.8 hours to 34 hours. Most proposed solutions to this issue have focused solely on increasing available inpatient psychiatric hospital beds, rather than considering alternative emergency care designs that could provide prompt access to treatment and might reduce the need for many hospitalizations. One suggested option has been the “regional dedicated emergency psychiatric facility,” which serves to evaluate and treat all mental health patients for a given area, and can accept direct transfers from other EDs. This study sought to assess the effects of a regional dedicated emergency psychiatric facility design known at the “Alameda Model” on boarding times and hospitalization rates for psychiatric patients in area EDs. Methods Over a 30-day period beginning in January 2013, 5 community hospitals in Alameda County, California, tracked all ED patients on involuntary mental health holds to determine boarding time, defined as the difference between when they were deemed stable for psychiatric disposition and the time they were discharged from the ED for transfer to the regional psychiatric emergency service. Patients were also followed to determine the percentage admitted to inpatient psychiatric units after evaluation and treatment in the psychiatric emergency service. Results In a total sample of 144 patients, the average boarding time was approximately 1 hour and 48 minutes. Only 24.8% were admitted for inpatient psychiatric hospitalization from the psychiatric emergency service. Conclusion The results of this study indicate that the Alameda Model of transferring patients from general hospital EDs to a regional psychiatric emergency service reduced the length of boarding times for patients awaiting psychiatric care by over 80% versus comparable state ED averages. Additionally, the psychiatric emergency service can provide assessment and treatment that may stabilize over 75% of the crisis mental health population at this level of care, thus dramatically alleviating the demand for inpatient psychiatric beds. The improved, timely access to care, along with the savings from reduced boarding times and hospitalization costs, may well justify the costs of a regional psychiatric emergency service in appropriate systems.
Article
Full-text available
Objectives. Studies have demonstrated the adverse effects of emergency department (ED) boarding. This study examines the impact of resource utilization, throughput, and financial impact for psychiatric patients awaiting inpatient placement. Methods. The authors retrospectively studied all psychiatric and non-psychiatric adult admissions in an Academic Medical Center ED (>68,000 adult visits) from January 2007-2008. The main outcomes were ED length of stay (LOS) and associated reimbursement. Results. 1,438 patients were consulted to psychiatry with 505 (35.1%) requiring inpatient psychiatric care management. The mean psychiatric patient age was 42.5 years (SD 13.1 years), with 2.7 times more women than men. ED LOS was significantly longer for psychiatric admissions (1089 min, CI (1039-1140) versus 340 min, CI (304-375); P < 0.001) when compared to non-psychiatric admissions. The financial impact of psychiatric boarding accounted for a direct loss of ($1,198) compared to non-psychiatric admissions. Factoring the loss of bed turnover for waiting patients and opportunity cost due to loss of those patients, psychiatric patient boarding cost the department $2,264 per patient. Conclusions. Psychiatric patients awaiting inpatient placement remain in the ED 3.2 times longer than non-psychiatric patients, preventing 2.2 bed turnovers (additional patients) per psychiatric patient, and decreasing financial revenue.
Article
Full-text available
Improving the U.S. health care system requires simultaneous pursuit of three aims: improving the experience of care, improving the health of populations, and reducing per capita costs of health care. Preconditions for this include the enrollment of an identified population, a commitment to universality for its members, and the existence of an organization (an "integrator") that accepts responsibility for all three aims for that population. The integrator's role includes at least five components: partnership with individuals and families, redesign of primary care, population health management, financial management, and macro system integration.
Article
We describe risk factors associated with patients experiencing physical restraint or seclusion in the psychiatric emergency service (PES). We retrospectively reviewed medical records, nursing logs and quality assurance data for all adult patient encounters in a PES over a 12-month period (June 1, 2011-May 31, 2012). Descriptors included demographic characteristics, diagnoses, laboratory values, and clinician ratings of symptom severity. χ(2) and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed. Restraint/seclusion occurred in 14% of 5335 patient encounters. The following characteristics were associated with restraint/seclusion: arrival to the PES in restraints; referral not initiated by the patient; arrival between 1900 and 0059 hours; bipolar mania or mixed episode; and clinician rating of severe disruptiveness, psychosis or insight impairment. Severe suicidality and a depression diagnosis were associated with less risk of restraint or seclusion. Acute symptomatology and characteristics of the encounter were more likely to be associated with restraint/seclusion than patient demographics or diagnoses. These findings support recent guidelines for the treatment of agitation and can help clinicians identify patients at risk of behavioral decompensation.
ER wait times, length of stay far longer for psychiatric patients
  • M Castellucci
Castellucci, M. ER wait times, length of stay far longer for psychiatric patients. Modern Healthcare. http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20161017/NEWS/161019918 October 17, 2016. Accessed August 30, 2017..
Using lean to rapidly and sustainably transform a behavioral health crisis program: impact on throughput and safety
  • M Balfour
  • K Tannner
  • P J Jurica
  • D Llewellyn
  • R G Williamson
  • C A Carson
Balfour M, Tannner K, Jurica PJ, Llewellyn D, Williamson RG, Carson CA. Using lean to rapidly and sustainably transform a behavioral health crisis program: impact on throughput and safety. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2017;43(6):275-283.
Data presented at the American Psychiatric Association
  • S L Zeller
Zeller, SL. Data presented at the American Psychiatric Association 2017 Annual Meeting; May 22, 2017; San Diego, California.