Abstract
This study is an attempt to investigate the written corpora of Iraqi EFL medical students
at the level of morphosyntax. The study aims to identify, classify, and supply a plausible
interpretation for the different morphosyntactic errors made by the learners. It is hypothesized that Iraqi EFL human and veterinary medical students face serious difficulties in the area of morphosyntactic elements at both recognition and production levels.
To achieve the study aims, two types of procedures have been followed: theoretical and
practical. Theoretically, a framework of morphosyntax is presented including its definitions, elements, uses, etc. Practically, a corpus of (200) English written compositions was collected from (100) human and (100) veterinary medical students at human and veterinary medicine colleges at the University of Diyala. They have experienced approximately the same number of years of education through primary and secondary education. All of the participants come from a non-English speaking background and hardly communicate in English outside the school. The data used in the study are participants’ written essays and their responses to 25 multiple-choice items in an achievement test prepared for the purpose of the study. All of the errors in the essays and achievement tests have been identified and classified into various categorizations using suitable statistical tools.
The results of the study show that Iraqi medical students face difficulties in using
morphosyntactic elements in general, but they face fewer difficulties in recognizing
morphosyntactic elements than producing them. However, human medical students prove to face less difficulties in recognizing and producing morphosyntactic elements than veterinary medical students. Moreover, there are some kinds of variations between human and veterinary medicine students at the level of difficulties in using morphosyntactic elements and even in using one morphosyntactic element from another. The most problematic morphosyntactic elements for human medical students are gerund, future perfect, discourse organization & word order among other (25) selected morphosyntactic elements in the study. Meanwhile, discourse organization & word order, could have p.p, gerund are the most problematic morphosyntactic elements for veterinary medical students among other (25) selected morphosyntactic elements.
Analysis of the medical students’ written corpora using pos tagging show that human medical students commit errors mainly in base verb, wh pronoun, 3rd person participle, adverb, noun pl, number, conjunction, adjective, noun, pronoun, past tense verb, etc. On the other hand, veterinary students commit more errors in wh pronouns, base verb, noun pl, pronoun, number, conjunction, past tense verb, nouns, adverb, adjective, 3rd person participle, etc. The results have also shown that both groups of medical students have not considerably developed their skills in using morphosyntactic elements in writing with some variations in favor of human medical students.
The study ends with some pedagogical implications to overcome the aforementioned
problematic morphosyntactic elements and for better writing performance. The findings
suggest that Iraqi medical students are not fully aware of how to use morphosyntactic elements in IV recognition and in writing. Such an insight into language learning problems can be useful for teachers because it provides information on common trouble-spots in language learning which can be used in the preparation of more effective teaching materials for medical students.