ArticlePDF Available

Abstract and Figures

Despite the key role that knowledge on breeding biology of Accipitriformes plays in their management and conservation, survey of the state-of-the-art and of information gaps spanning the entire Neotropics has not been done since 1995. We provide an updated classi cation of current knowledge about breeding biology of Neotropical Accipitridae and de ne the taxa that should be prioritized by future studies. We analyzed 440 publications produced since 1995 that reported breeding of 56 species. ere is a persistent scarcity, or complete absence, of information about the nests of eight species, and about breeding behavior of another ten. Among these species, the largest gap of breeding data refers to the former “Leucopternis” hawks. Although 66% of the 56 evaluated species had some improvement on knowledge about their breeding traits, research still focus disproportionately on a few regions and species, and the scarcity of breeding data on many South American Accipitridae persists. We noted that analysis of records from both a citizen science digital database and museum egg collections signi cantly increased breeding information on some species, relative to recent literature. We created four groups of priority species for breeding biology studies, based on knowledge gaps and threat categories at global level. Group I (great scarcity of information, plus higher categories of threat): Leptodon forbesi, Cryptoleucopteryx plumbea, and Buteogallus lacernulatus; Group II (breeding data have recently increased, but threat categories are high): Spizaetus isidori, Accipiter gundlachi, Buteogallus coronatus, Pseudastur occidentalis, and Buteo ventralis; Group III (“Near reatened” species with still scarce breeding information): Accipiter poliogaster, Accipiter collaris, Buteogallus aequinoctialis, and Pseudastur polionotus; and Group IV (other priority cases): Buteo ridgwayi, Buteo galapagoensis, four eagles (Morphnus guianensis, Harpia harpyja, Spizaetus ornatus and Buteogallus solitarius), Leptodon cayanensis, Accipiter superciliosus, Buteogallus schistaceus, and the three Leucopternis hawks (L. semiplumbeus, L. melanops and L. kuhli). We also discuss the way that novel breeding data can show in what manners di erent species and populations are responding to environmental changes.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia 26(2): 151–186.
June 2018 ARTICLE
INTRODUCTION
Accipitriformes (osprey, kites, hawks, and eagles; families
Pandionidae and Accipitridae) is an extremely diversied
and successful clade of diurnal raptors (Ferguson-Lees &
Christie 2001, Márquez et al. 2005, Amaral et al. 2009,
Dickinson & Remsen-Jr. 2013). ese predators have a
noteworthy participation in trophic webs, being able to
mediate the whole structure and diversity of a community
(Bierregaard-Jr. 1995, Touchton et al. 2002), and are also
relevant indicators of environmental quality (Jullien &
iollay 1996, Blendinger et al. 2004, iollay 2007)
and providers of important environmental services (Estes
et al. 2011). Breeding biology of this clade is widely
varied (Newton 2010, Whitacre & Burnham 2012), and
knowledge about the breeding patterns of each species
and subspecies plays a central role in their eective
conservation (de Labra et al. 2013).
Many breeding aspects of Accipitriformes are in fact
important parameters for management and conservation
Breeding biology of Neotropical Accipitriformes: current
knowledge and research priorities
Julio Amaro Betto Monsalvo1,3, Neander Marcel Heming2 & Miguel Ângelo Marini2
1 Programa de Pós-graduação em Ecologia, IB, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, DF, Brazil.
2 Departamento de Zoologia, IB, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, DF, Brazil.
3 Corresponding author: juliobetto@yahoo.com.br
Received on 08 March 2018. Accepted on 20 July 2018.
ABSTRACT: Despite the key role that knowledge on breeding biology of Accipitriformes plays in their management and conservation,
survey of the state-of-the-art and of information gaps spanning the entire Neotropics has not been done since 1995. We provide
an updated classication of current knowledge about breeding biology of Neotropical Accipitridae and dene the taxa that should
be prioritized by future studies. We analyzed 440 publications produced since 1995 that reported breeding of 56 species. ere is a
persistent scarcity, or complete absence, of information about the nests of eight species, and about breeding behavior of another ten.
Among these species, the largest gap of breeding data refers to the former “Leucopternis” hawks. Although 66% of the 56 evaluated
species had some improvement on knowledge about their breeding traits, research still focus disproportionately on a few regions and
species, and the scarcity of breeding data on many South American Accipitridae persists. We noted that analysis of records from both
a citizen science digital database and museum egg collections signicantly increased breeding information on some species, relative
to recent literature. We created four groups of priority species for breeding biology studies, based on knowledge gaps and threat
categories at global level. Group I (great scarcity of information, plus higher categories of threat): Leptodon forbesi, Cryptoleucopteryx
plumbea, and Buteogallus lacernulatus; Group II (breeding data have recently increased, but threat categories are high): Spizaetus
isidori, Accipiter gundlachi, Buteogallus coronatus, Pseudastur occidentalis, and Buteo ventralis; Group III (“Near reatened” species
with still scarce breeding information): Accipiter poliogaster, Accipiter collaris, Buteogallus aequinoctialis, and Pseudastur polionotus;
and Group IV (other priority cases): Buteo ridgwayi, Buteo galapagoensis, four eagles (Morphnus guianensis, Harpia harpyja, Spizaetus
ornatus and Buteogallus solitarius), Leptodon cayanensis, Accipiter superciliosus, Buteogallus schistaceus, and the three Leucopternis hawks
(L. semiplumbeus, L. melanops and L. kuhli). We also discuss the way that novel breeding data can show in what manners dierent
species and populations are responding to environmental changes.
KEYWORDS: eagles, hawks, information gaps, life history, raptors, reproduction.
programs. For instance, clutch size is directly related to
population size, and this is related with extinction risk
of species (Krüger & Radford 2008). Conversely, their
reproductive rates are related to population density
(Krüger 2000). Also, nest site choices reveal habitat
selection by these raptors (Ferguson-Lees & Christie
2001), and therefore make evident their sensitivity to
environmental changes (Trejo 2007a).
According to the latest classication adopted by the
American Ornithologists' Union (NACC 2017, Remsen-
Jr. et al. 2018 – therefore, AOU), there are 28 genera and
67 species of Accipitriformes occurring in the Neotropical
region. Nonetheless, most Neotropical breeding data
presented in some key references on diurnal raptors (e.g.,
Ferguson-Lees & Christie 2001, del Hoyo et al. 2016)
have important limitations. Information often consist of
no more than anecdotal breeding records coming from
scattered studies, or are generalizations based other tropical
regions of the world (e.g., Newton 2010), largely unveried
to occur in the Neotropics (Whitacre & Burnham 2012).
Review of breeding biology of Neotropical Accipitriformes
Monsalvo et al.
152
Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia 26(2): 2018 Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia 26(2): 2018
Bierregaard-Jr. (1995) reviewed the state of the
knowledge available addressing various aspects of the
biology of 81 diurnal raptors that breed mainly in Central
and South America. Regarding the breeding biology, the
author showed that nests of 11 species of Accipitriformes
and breeding behavior of 15 were not described. Moreover,
most research concentrated on a few regions, such as
further north of the Neotropics (e.g., southern part of
North America, and Guatemala). He also mentions that
breeding data on most of South American species and
subspecies of raptors is lacking (Bierregaard-Jr. 1995).
More recently, similar reviews were done only on
a few South American countries (Pardiñas & Cirignoli
2002, Trejo et al. 2006, Trejo 2007a, b, Raimilla et al.
2012, Cortés et al. 2013). ese studies assessed from
four to 28 species, and just two reviews (Trejo 2007a, b)
dealt with a larger amount (55 species). All these analyses
comprised only studies conducted in the specic country
(ies) (i.e., Argentina, Chile and Uruguay), and so none
included raptors that occur north of the Southern Cone
of South America. Consequently, these surveys left out
the Amazon Basin, one of the world's most decient
areas on bird breeding data, and around 20 species of
Accipitriformes (Whitacre & Burnham 2012, del Hoyo
et al. 2016, Xiao et al. 2016).
Countries that produce most scientic publications
on breeding biology of Neotropical birds do not have
english as their native language (Heming et al. 2013,
Freile et al. 2014). For instance, all recent reviews on
South American raptor research were written in Spanish
(save their abstracts), with the exception of Trejo et al.
(2006). Yet, there is still a visibility bias aecting science
made in such countries (Cabot & de Vries 2004, Lortie et
al. 2007), making such publications not easily accessible
for researchers that do not read spanish or portuguese (see
Bierregaard-Jr. 1995).
Moreover, many information on the natural history
of Neotropical raptors come from studies not specically
designed for this aim (Cortés et al. 2013). Such studies
often are published at small, local journals or bulletins
(Figueroa, in litt.). us, important advances in
knowledge are hardly visible to ornithologists from other
countries. Indeed, Bierregaard-Jr. (1995) mentioned
that “inaccessibility” of certain Latin American journals
may have prevented him from collecting information
from them. However, since then, internet access to
many of these journals greatly improved (e.g., Hornero,
from Argentina; http://digital.bl.fcen.uba.ar), allowing
more complete reviews to be made. Also, during the last
two decades, the ornithological community of South
America increased considerably, boosting the number of
publications (Vuilleumier 2004, Freile 2005, Freile et al.
2014).
Scrutiny of oological (egg) collections from museums
could also be useful for avian breeding biology research
(McNair 1987). Yet, very few researchers in the Neotropics
used museum eggs for analyzing breeding traits of diurnal
raptors (e.g., Denis et al. 2013, Hayes 2014), the most
frequent approach being the presentation of revised
summaries of some specic collections (e.g., Román &
Wiley 2012). Also, Bierregaard-Jr. (1995) did not provide
information on museum eggs when evaluating knowledge
on breeding biology of diurnal raptors, although such
data is to some extent included in past literature (e.g.,
Belcher & Smooker 1934). e amount of information
(unpub. data) that we and other authors (Murphy 1989,
Olsen & Marples 1993) obtained from museum egg sets
strongly suggests that such sources could provide data not
easily obtainable from other sources.
Considering the above, there is a need for a new
comprehensive survey to access the state of the knowledge
on the breeding biology of Neotropical Accipitriformes,
and an update on research priorities. So, our main objective
was to make a comprehensive analysis of the literature
on breeding biology of Neotropical Accipitriformes
produced after Bierregaard-Jr.'s (1995) review, and thus,
to dene the taxa that should be prioritized by future
studies. We created an updated classication of current
levels of knowledge of the breeding biology of these
raptors, evaluating the progress made in the last decades.
We also discuss the information gaps, ponder on their
possible causes, implications, and potential solutions
to the lack of breeding data, and present additional
information obtained from alternative sources such as
a citizen science database and museum collections. To
conclude, we briey exemplify how breeding data can
show the ways that dierent species and populations are
responding to environmental changes.
METHODS
Taxa
We follow Bierregaard-Jr.'s (1995) criteria by not
including species with centers of distribution outside the
Neotropics (see below), and Nearctic taxa that do not
breed in there (which excluded the family Pandionidae
from the analysis). us, we perform a comprehensive
recent review of Neotropical raptors, including 56 species.
Our subspecies division follows Dickinson & Remsen-Jr.
(2013).
Categories and scoring criteria, and major
changes in classication
We used two categories concerning reproduction, largely
based on Bierregaard-Jr. (1995) and Trejo (2007a). Under
“nest”, the information that we analyzed includes the
physical description of the nest, as well as its seasonality
Review of breeding biology of Neotropical Accipitriformes
Monsalvo et al.
153
Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia 26(2): 2018 Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia 26(2): 2018
and location, clutch size, and description of eggs. at is,
all aspects, mostly “physical”, related to the early nesting
stage. Under “breeding behavior”, we included breeding
displays of adult birds; descriptions of copulating and
parental behaviors; incubation and edging times;
development of the young (both morphological and
behavioral); the period of dependence of juvenile(s)
after its rst ights (post-edging dependency period);
and more detailed information – provided by relatively
few studies – such as spatial distribution of breeding
pairs, rate of reproductive success, nest productivity, and
subsequent dispersal and survival of juveniles.
e numerical scores assigned in the classicatory
scale of knowledge also follow the criteria of Bierregaard-
Jr. (1995) and Trejo (2007a): (0) no information; (1)
only anecdotal/scattered reports; (2) detailed study of
one breeding pair or event; (3) study of more than one
pair in the same population, and/or a substantial amount
of anecdotal reports of representative areas of the species
range; (4) detailed studies of separate populations in
dierent portions of the species range; and (5) detailed
information from the entire range of the species.
Besides producing an updated classication of
current levels of knowledge about the breeding biology
of these raptors, these scores act as an intuitive measuring
scale to signal whether some reproductive aspects
and taxa still need more studies (see also “Research
recommendations and conservation relevance”). More
importantly, they allowed a comparison between our
scores and those reported by Bierregaard-Jr. (1995), to
assess whether levels of knowledge changed in the last
decades, and thus identify persistent gaps.
Classication had to be evaluated and updated, due
to changes since 1995. Two of these changes were the
recent splits of the “Gray Hawk” complex (Buteo nitidus/
Buteo plagiatus; Millsap et al. 2011), and of Cuban Black
Hawk Buteogallus gundlachii and Common Black Hawk
Buteogallus anthracinus (Wiley & Garrido 2005). On the
rst case, the split of the taxon into southern and northern
forms facilitates the evaluation of its case, and we chose
to consider the scores attributed to “Buteo nitidus” by
Bierregaard-Jr. (1995), as default for both B. nitidus and
B. plagiatus. For the Black Hawks, Bierregaard-Jr. did not
report a separate score for the then subspecies gundlachii,
what prevented us from making a comparison of levels of
knowledge about this taxon then and now. Nevertheless,
we briey discuss the status of Cuban Black Hawk on
Appendix III.
Bierregaard-Jr. (1995) reported dierent scores
for the taxa Accipiter ventralis, Accipiter chionogaster and
Accipiter erythronemius, but these are currently classied
as subspecies of the Sharp-shinned Hawk Accipiter striatus
(Remsen-Jr. et al. 2018). In turn, Sharp-shinned Hawk
was not included in Bierregaard-Jr.'s review, for having a
center of distribution outside Central and South America.
Ferguson-Lees & Christie (2001) already argued that this
so-called “Central and South American group” of Sharp-
shinned Hawk's subspecies (that is, A. s. ventralis, A. s.
chionogaster and A. s. erythronemius) is so divergent, that
treatment at species level should be considered for at least
some of these, but not for other groups of subspecies
such as the Caribbean. Since Remsen-Jr. et al. (2018)
acknowledge that the taxonomic status of A. striatus still
needs clarication, we comment on the knowledge on
those three subspecies on Appendix III.
Other hawk species with some breeding populations
in the Neotropics (mostly in the Caribbean) but centers
of distribution in the Nearctic were excluded from
our analysis. We based such decision not only because
comparing scores of knowledge then and now was
impossible, since Bierregaard-Jr. (1995) also excluded
those from his assessment. Most importantly, we rely
on evidence of little divergence between some of such
disjunct populations and its Nearctic counterparts, on
respect of phenotypic traits (Ferguson-Lees & Christie
2001), especially most breeding aspects (e.g., Santana &
Temple 1988). Likewise, such ndings are being further
supported by an ongoing meta-analysis of geographical
variation on these species breeding patterns (author's
unpub. data).
Other splits adopted by Bierregaard-Jr. (1995),
but not maintained on current classication, are
Accipiter chilensis” (subspecies of Bicolored Hawk A.
bicolor), “Buteogallus subtilis” (included three subspecies
of Common Black Hawk) and “Buteo poecilochrous
(subspecies of Variable Hawk Geranoaetus [Buteo]
polyosoma). We ignored the scores that Bierregaard-Jr.
separately assigned to each of these taxa, and analyzed
only those ascribed to the currently recognized species.
Yet, we commented on the status of some of these
subspecies when relevant.
Literature search methods and sources
We screened the Global Raptor Information Network
(GRIN; http://www.globalraptors.org/grin/indexAlt.asp)
until October 2016. is database focus only on raptors,
concentrating information on diurnal species from around
the world and includes bibliography of other renowned
databases on raptors such as e Peregrine Fund and
Raptor Information System. We analyzed the literature
on reproduction of the 56 species after 1994, indicated
in the section “Breeding” in the species accounts. We
also searched for other studies whose titles refer to
reproductive aspects, mainly the bibliography contained
in the topic “Breeding biology”. In some isolated cases,
we considered in this review breeding data not published
in other sources and made available by researchers in the
GRIN database.
We chose to use Google Scholar (http://scholar.
Review of breeding biology of Neotropical Accipitriformes
Monsalvo et al.
154
Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia 26(2): 2018 Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia 26(2): 2018
google.com/) as the main tool to complement GRIN
reference search because we noted it was able to locate
the same references found with Scopus and Searchable
Ornithological Research Archive (SORA; http://elibrary.
unm.edu/sora), search tools also chosen by almost all
recent revisions (Trejo 2007a, b, Raimilla et al. 2012,
Cortés et al. 2013). e search terms we used were all
possible scientic names recently assigned for these
species (except for those variables only in the sux,
which were already supplied by the search heuristic),
combined with each of the following terms: nest, ninho,
nido, nidicação, anidamiento, anidación, reprodução,
reproducción, breeding, and biologia reprodutiva. e
great redundancy of results when using somewhat similar
terms indicated the eectiveness of the choices, and terms
like nesting” and “biología reproductiva” were discarded.
We searched for all kinds of references, from articles
in any category of scientic journal, through monographs,
conference abstracts and posters, to technical reports
and unpublished manuscripts. We reviewed citations
contained in the references, even though most were
already found in key word searches. Yet, we could not
retrieve 19 (4.1%) of the 459 references produced
between 1995–2016 (Appendix IV), neither through
requesting directly from their authors nor from databases
such as e Peregrine Fund.
We also screened and retrieved information from a
bibliographical review of Brazilian birds (Oniki & Willis
2002), and the following books: Bird et al. (1996), Sick
(1997), Machado et al. (1998), Arballo & Cravino (1999),
Naka & Rodrigues (2000), Höing & Camargo (2002),
Fontana et al. (2003), Reichle et al. (2003), Wheeler
(2003), Willis & Oniki (2003), Antas (2004), Mikich &
Bérnils (2004), de la Peña (2005), Márquez et al. (2005),
Angehr (2006), Sigrist (2006), Eisermann & Avendaño
(2007), Gussoni & Guaraldo (2008), Whitacre (2012),
Santos (2014), Straube et al. (2014), and Alvarado et al.
(2015).
Exclusion and inclusion search criteria
As previously mentioned, Bierregaard-Jr. (1995)
claimed that antiquity or “obscurity” of certain journals,
particularly Latin American's, prevented him from
gathering information from them. Yet, he did include
some of these studies that were cited in more broadly
distributed journals. We veried that some of these
Latin American journals (e.g., Hornero) were already
scrutinized by recent reviews (Trejo 2007a, b, Raimilla
et al. 2012). Notwithstanding, we could not determine
with certainty which studies prior to 1995 were not
included by Bierregaard-Jr., given that his study lacks a
complete list of references. So, we opted to consider only
papers published from 1995 on, to avoid repeating data
already collected. After all, one of our aims was to get a
clear picture of the amount of research done in the last
decades, and not previously.
We also assume that papers from 1995 would not
have been included by Bierregaard-Jr. Depending on
the date of completion of his search (not stated in the
paper), the author could have included at least some of
these studies, but information contained in such papers
is not consistent with certain scores assigned by him [e.g.,
the Gray-backed Hawk Pseudastur occidentalis, studied
by Vargas (1995)]. is fact suggests that in most cases
the inclusion of these papers in that review may not have
occurred. Nevertheless, only a few studies from 1995
were found in our review, suggesting that the inuence
of possible duplicate data on the dierent species would
be irrelevant.
Some books contain secondary information often
without direct citation of the original data (e.g., Ferguson-
Lees & Christie 2001, Márquez et al. 2005, Sigrist 2006).
Because of lack of clear indication of each of their sources
in the text, we could not retrieve the original studies year
or sometimes even the geographic region. us, we also
chose to not include such breeding reports, except when
it was clearly indicated in the text that it was an original
data.
Research recommendations and
conservation relevance
We created a four-group classication of research
priorities on species breeding aspects, based mostly on
knowledge gaps (by means of the assigned numerical
scores), but also considering current threat categories at
the global level (IUCN 2017). Group I includes species
with great scarcity of available information about their
reproduction, combined with higher categories of threat.
Group II comprises species whose studies have advanced,
although very little since Bierregaard's (1995) review,
but which are at some higher threat category. Group III
includes species whose knowledge is still scarce and are
currently “Near reatened” according to IUCN. Finally,
Group IV represents species framed in three possible
situations: i) the knowledge about their breeding has not
increased (although it was already very high, i.e. scores
of 4 or 5) and also are in some greater category of threat;
ii) the remaining species considered “Near reatened”;
or iii) species not threatened, but of which nothing or
practically nothing is known about their reproduction
and/or have at least one of the topics of breeding aspects
classied as 1 (see “Categories and scoring criteria, and
major changes in classication”).
Screening of the Handbook of Birds of the
World and WikiAves
e Handbook of Birds of the World (HBW) was the
Review of breeding biology of Neotropical Accipitriformes
Monsalvo et al.
155
Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia 26(2): 2018 Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia 26(2): 2018
baseline for Bierregaard-Jr.'s (1995) gap analysis and until
today is considered a reference for current knowledge
about biology of bird species (e.g., Trejo et al. 2006, Xiao
et al. 2016). us, we opted to review information in
the online version “HBW Alive” (http://www.hbw.com).
Our purpose was to determine if data available regarding
reproductive aspects (topic “Breeding”, in each species
account) were commensurate with the actual state of
knowledge about these subjects.
e online database WikiAves (www.wikiaves.
com) is a collaborative tool launched in 2008 that allows
posting of photographic records of bird species that occur
in Brazil. is initiative has a great advantage over other
popular citizen science platforms, such as eBird (ebird.
org), by working with digital records and not lists. Also,
we are not aware of initiatives from other Neotropical
countries (e.g., http://www.wikiaves.com.ar/inicio.php)
that are equally reliable and allow similar content-based
searches of their records.
Considering the enduring scarcity of avian breeding
records from South American mid-latitudes (Baker 1938,
Heming et al. 2013), the fact that WikiAves focus on
Brazil is particularly convenient. We searched for breeding
records of 25 species in this database. e low number of
species was due primarily to the scope of WikiAves, which
only contains species recorded in Brazil. In addition, we
chose to review only species that obtained scores less than
3 in at least one of the categories, or those with values
equal to or greater than that, but for which there was a
marked relative scarcity of South American data. In the
Advanced Search” tool for photos, we used (separately)
the lters: egg, nest, juvenile, copulating, incubating,
courting, caring/feeding its chick(s), and making nest.
e search was made in October 2016 and we included
only records whose identication was considered secure
– both at specic level and, in the case of breeding
behaviors and/or stages that were clearly illustrated in the
photographic records. Records already present in papers
located in the survey were discarded.
Museum egg records
Eggs and labels were photographed in the following egg
collections between 2014–2017 at Western Foundation
of Vertebrate Zoology - WFVZ (Camarillo, USA),
Natural History Museum - NHMUK (Tring, UK),
National Museum of Scotland - NMS (Edinburgh, UK),
Muséum national d'Histoire Naturelle - MNHN (Paris,
France), Naturhistoriches Museum - NMW (Wien,
Austria), Instituto de Investigación de los Recursos
Biológicos “Alexander von Humboldt” - IAVH (Villa
de Leyva, Colombia), Museo Argentino de Ciencias
Naturales “Bernardino Rivadavia” - MACN (Buenos
Aires, Argentina), Museo de Ciencias Naturales de La
Plata - MLP (La Plata, Argentina) and in Brazil, Museu
de Zoologia da Universidade de São Paulo - MZUSP
(São Paulo), Museu Nacional do Rio de Janeiro - MN
(Rio de Janeiro), Museu Paraense “Emilio Goeldi” -
MPEG (Belém), and Coleção Ornitológica “Marcelo
Bagno” - COMB (Brasília). We also visited the online
egg collections of the Field Museum of Natural History
- FMNH (Chicago, USA), and the Arctos Collaborative
Collection Management Solution (arctos.database.
museum), and had access to data of the egg collection of
the Smithsonian Institution (USNM, Washington, D.C.,
USA), and the American Museum of Natural History
(AMNH, New York, USA). Finally, we consulted the
catalog of the Cris-Rivers Region Museum (CRRM,
Oradea, Romania; Béczy 1971).
ese author's previous experience suggests that
diurnal raptor's eggs collected in the United States can
outnumber those from all other new world countries
together, on a ratio of roughly nine to one (authors'
unpub. data). Also, Bierregaard-Jr. (1995) veried that
when the distribution of a species reaches the southern
part of North America, it tends to be much more studied
there than in the rest of its range. Considering the above,
we opted to not include museum data from eggs collected
in the USA in this analysis. Breeding information from
that country certainly is already overly represented in
literature, and augmenting it with museum records would
only exacerbate this bias.
Museum egg sets are a proven reliable source
(McNair 1987), but a few inconsistencies in the records
of certain collectors have been reported (Hellmayr &
Conover 1949, orstrom & Ki 1999). us, we
carefully validated species identication based on our
own experience, on remarks from other researchers, and
also resorting on other references that provide clutch
sizes, egg measurements and descriptions (e.g., the GRIN
database). A few species suer from faulty information
about their eggs and clutches in the literature, and these
cases are still being validated by us. Such egg sets are not
assigned to any species here but are included in the total
number of sets we found from the Neotropics. In the
process of validating eggs' identication, measurements
were standardized using the software ImageJ (Bridge et al.
2007, Troscianko 2014).
RESULTS
Bierregaard-Jr.'s (1995) review found 431 references
of 81 species and included information about various
aspects of Neotropical raptor biology. Meanwhile, our
research found 440 references exclusively about breeding
biology of 54 species (out of 56 studied taxa – as we
did not nd any published records for two species).
Review of breeding biology of Neotropical Accipitriformes
Monsalvo et al.
156
Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia 26(2): 2018 Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia 26(2): 2018
Such results are presented in Appendix I, with complete
reference list on Appendix II. is represents an increase
in the number of published references since Bierregaard-
Jr.'s review, especially since he covered many other aspects
of biology, included also Falconidae, and had no date
limitation (unlike our scope of 22 years). We found 11
references and citations referring to data from captive
birds, but these were not included in our review given
the uncertainty involving raptor's breeding aspects in
unnatural conditions (Cabot-Nieves et al. 2013).
Much of the breeding data we found came from
inventories that provide a list of species for one or
more localities, often highlighting new occurrences or
noteworthy records (e.g., Bodrati et al. 2010), or research
addressing ecological aspects of bird communities of a
given region (e.g., Cintra & Naka 2012). Observations
on the breeding activity of some species are frequently
included in such studies (e.g., Hennessey et al. 2003),
and it is common for raptors to receive some prominence
(e.g., Greeney & Nunnery 2006). However, such reports
still remain mostly anecdotal (e.g., Ruvalcaba-Ortega &
González-Rojas 2009). For instance, nest records often
do not provide any information on nest content or stage
(e.g., Bodrati et al. 2010), frequently because the nest was
presumably inaccessible to the researchers (e.g., Bellatti
2000). Many times all that can be concluded is that the
species was “nesting” in a given locality, during a quite
long period of time (e.g., Cavicchia & García 2012).
Of the 11 species of Neotropical accipitrids for
which the nest had not been described prior to 1995,
six remain undescribed and two present only anecdotal/
scattered reports (Table 1). Of 15 species with no
information about their breeding behavior (e.g., Leptodon
cayanensis, Cryptoleucopteryx plumbea, Leucopternis
melanops) in 1995, little or no additional information is
still not available for 10. Also, in 1995 only anecdotal
descriptions were available for the nests of 15 species,
and breeding behaviors of another 14 species. is case
remains the same for the Tiny Hawk Accipiter superciliosus
and Rufous Crab Hawk Buteogallus aequinoctialis, which
have no recent published information. Yet, 66% of the
analyzed species (n = 37) showed an increase in knowledge,
of these, nearly half (n = 19) showed an increase in only
one of the categories, and the remaining in both.
Probably the most signicant increases in knowledge
were for Barred Hawk Morphnarchus princeps and White-
throated Hawk Buteo albigula, followed by Gray-bellied
Hawk Accipiter poliogaster, Chaco Eagle Buteogallus
coronatus, Gray-backed Hawk and Rufous-tailed Hawk
Buteo ventralis, and also Rufous-thighed Kite Harpagus
diodon. e following species also had a signicant increase
in knowledge about the two breeding categories: Black-
and-white Hawk-Eagle Spizaetus melanoleucus, Black-
collared Hawk Busarellus nigricollis, Long-winged Harrier
Circus buoni, Crane Hawk Geranospiza caerulescens,
Solitary Eagle Buteogallus solitarius and Short-tailed
Hawk Buteo brachyurus. On the other hand, very scant
information was found for the former “Leucopternis
hawks, currently classied in ve genera. Even the best-
known species in this polyphyletic group of 10 species
(Amaral et al. 2009), the Barred Hawk and the White
Hawk Pseudastur albicollis, either have only anecdotal
reports in distinct areas of the species distribution range,
or detailed studies of nests from just one population (e.g.,
Muela & Valdez 2003, Cisneros-Heredia 2006, Gelis &
Greeney 2007, Draheim 2012).
As Bierregaard-Jr. (1995) also noted, we found a
longstanding concentration of studies further north of the
Neotropics (i.e., southern United States), as well as in the
northern portion of this region. For instance, Guatemala
still stood out due to the quantity and quality of research
developed by the Peregrine Fund's Maya Project, which
resulted in a large number of published studies on raptor
biology (e.g., Seavy & Gerhardt 1998, Seavy et al. 1998,
orstrom & Quixchán 2000, Sutter et al. 2001, Panasci
& Whitacre 2002), ultimately leading to the publication
of a book (Whitacre 2012). e Southern Cone of South
America also have a large amount of research developed in
Chile, already emphasized by Bierregaard-Jr. (1995), and
Argentina (e.g., Jiménez 1995, Trejo et al. 2001, Ojeda et
al. 2003, Medel-Hidalgo et al. 2015, Pérez 2015, Rivas-
Fuenzalida et al. 2015).
Even for species considered already relatively
well known, with both categories scoring 3 or 4, there
is a lasting shortage of research on South American
populations or subspecies. is was the case for the
White-tailed Kite Elanus leucurus, the Swallow-tailed
Kite Elanoides forcatus, and the Zone-tailed Hawk
Buteo albonotatus, among others. We also found little
or no information about the breeding biology of some
subspecies of some polytypic species, including the Cuban
Kite (Chondrohierax uncinatus wilsonii), considered a full
species and “Critically Endangered” by IUCN (2017);
Mangrove Black Hawk (Buteogallus anthracinus subtilis),
included in a separate species by Bierregaard-Jr. (1995);
Pearl Kite (Gampsonyx swainsoni magnus); and Snail Kite
(Rostrhamus sociabilis major). Additional comments in
Table 1 are given to indicate taxa and/or regions in which
research is critically needed.
Although incomplete, some sets of new studies
revealed both similarities and divergences in breeding
behavior between dierent populations. For instance,
the cooperative behavior of Harris's Hawks Parabuteo
unicinctus, well known for the subspecies P. u. harrisi in
the United States, at the time of Bierregaard-Jr.'s (1995)
review was not reported anywhere else in the species range.
ere is now good evidence that cooperative breeding
also occurs in at least one population of the nominate
subspecies in southeastern Brazil (Silva & Olmos 1997),
hence this behavior is not restricted to North America.
Review of breeding biology of Neotropical Accipitriformes
Monsalvo et al.
157
Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia 26(2): 2018 Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia 26(2): 2018
Table 1. Assessment of current knowledge on the breeding biology of 56 species of Neotropical Accipitriformes.
Species Bierr.
Nest
Bierr.
Behav Nest Breeding
behavior
Research
priority Comments
Elanus leucurus 4 4 4 4 No Lack of more detailed data from most regions, mainly
South America.
Gampsonyx swainsonii 3 3 3 3 No Still a lack of behavioral data from most regions,
particularly later stages.
Chondrohierax uncinatus 4 3 4 4 No Most data missing from South America; nothing from
subspecies wilsonii.
Leptodon cayanensis 1 0 3 1 IV Detailed data from only two areas; very few behavioral
data, particularly later stages.
Leptodon forbesi 0 0 0 1 I Only breeding displays.
Elanoides forcatus 3 3 4 4 No Many detailed studies, but there is still a lack of detailed
data from other areas.
Morphnus guianensis 2 2 3 3 IV Some detailed studies, but still a lack of behavioral data
in many regions.
Harpia harpyja 4 3 4 4 IV Still a lack of detailed data from some portions of the
range (e.g., Atlantic Forest).
Spizaetus tyrannus 3 3 3 4 No Still a lack of detailed data from many regions.
Spizaetus melanoleucus 1 1 3 3 No Isolated cases and incomplete observations.
Spizaetus ornatus 4 4 4 4 IV New data did not change status.
Spizaetus isidori 3 2 3 3 II Still a lack of detailed data from many regions.
Busarellus nigricollis 1 1 3 3 No Still a lack of detailed data from many regions.
Rostrhamus sociabilis 4 4 4 4 No Many detailed studies, but still missing data from most
regions/subspecies.
Helicolestes hamatus 3 3 3 3 No New data did not change status; only one population
studied in detail.
Harpagus bidentatus 3 1 3 3 No Only one population studied in detail; still a lack of
behavioral data.
Harpagus diodon 1 0 3 3 No Isolated cases and incomplete observations; still a lack
of behavioral data.
Ictinia plumbea 3 3 4 3 No Still a lack of more behavioral data from many regions.
Circus cinereus 3 1 3 3 No Lack of more detailed data from many regions.
Circus buoni 1 1 3 3 No Lack of more detailed data from many regions.
Accipiter poliogaster 0 0 2 3 III Basically, just one or two pairs studied in detail.
Accipiter superciliosus 1 1 1 1 IV Still very little information.
Accipiter collaris 0 0 0 1 III Only information of specimens on breeding condition.
Accipiter gundlachi 3 1 3 3 II Some detailed studies, but coming from a few areas.
Accipiter bicolor 3 3 3 3 No Most data missing for two subspecies; new data but
several old ones discarded.
Geranospiza caerulescens 1 1 3 3 No Only one population studied in detail.
Cryptoleucopteryx plumbea 0 0 0 0 I No new data.
Buteogallus schistaceus 0 0 0 0 IV No new data.
Buteogallus anthracinus 4 4 4 4 No Still a lack of South American data, especially from
subspecies subtilis.
Buteogallus aequinoctialis 1 1 1 1 III Still very little information.
Buteogallus meridionalis 4 3 4 3 No New data did not change status; still a lack of detailed
data from many regions.
Buteogallus lacernulatus 0 0 0 1 I Only displays.
Buteogallus urubitinga 3 3 4 3 No Still a lack of more behavioral data from most regions.
Buteogallus solitarius 1 1 3 3 IV Data on nests or late stages (nothing in between); lack of
data from most regions.
Buteogallus coronatus 1 1 4 3 II Many detailed studies, but there is still a lack of more
behavioral data.
Review of breeding biology of Neotropical Accipitriformes
Monsalvo et al.
158
Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia 26(2): 2018 Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia 26(2): 2018
Species Bierr.
Nest
Bierr.
Behav Nest Breeding
behavior
Research
priority Comments
Morphnarchus princeps 0 0 3 3 No Most data missing from many regions.
Rupornis magnirostris 3 3 4 3 No Some detailed studies, but still a lack of behavioral data
from most regions/subsp.
Parabuteo unicinctus 4 4 4 4 No New data did not change status; but evidence of
cooperative behavior in Brazil.
Parabuteo leucorrhous 1 1 2 3 No Isolated cases and incomplete observations.
Geranoaetus albicaudatus 3 3 3 3 No Detailed data only of two subspecies; lack of detailed
data from many regions.
Geranoaetus polyosoma 3 3 4 3 No Still a lack of more behavioral data.
Geranoaetus melanoleucus 3 3 4 3 No Some detailed studies, but still a lack of more behavioral
data from many regions.
Pseudastur polionotus 0 0 1 1 III Very little information.
Pseudastur albicollis 3 3 3 3 No New data did not change status; only one population
studied in detail.
Pseudastur occidentalis 0 1 3 3 II Only one population studied in detail.
Leucopternis semiplumbeus 1 0 1 1 IV No signicant advances.
Leucopternis melanops 0 0 ? ? IV No real advances.
Leucopternis kuhli 0 0 1 0 IV Only one nest.
Buteo plagiatus 3 3 4 3 No Still a lack of detailed data from most regions.
Buteo nitidus 3 3 3 3 No New data did not change status; many missing data,
incl. more egg descriptions.
Buteo ridgwayi 5 4 5 4 IV New data did not change status; still a lack of more
behavioral data.
Buteo albigula 1 0 4 3 No Breeding status in northern range still uncertain; many
missing data, incl. on eggs.
Buteo brachyurus 1 1 3 3 No Lack of more detailed data from most regions, mainly
South America.
Buteo galapagoensis 5 5 5 5 IV -
Buteo albonotatus 3 2 3 3 No Still limited to the northern range.
Buteo ventralis 1 0 3 3 II Still limited to Chile; many missing data, including
more egg descriptions.
Bierr. Nest and Bierr. Behav = scores assigned by Bierregaard-Jr. (1995), on Nest and Breeding behavior respectively; Nest and
Breeding behavior = scores assigned by this study. Scores: (0) no information; (1) only anecdotal/scattered reports; (2) detailed study
of one breeding pair or event; (3) study of more than one pair in the same population, and/or substantial amount of anecdotal reports
of representative areas of the range; (4) detailed studies of separate populations in dierent portions of the range; and (5) detailed
information from the entire range. Shaded cells denote improvements on knowledge in the last decades. Research priority = whether
species should be prioritized by future studies on breeding biology, and for those that should, the priority group (I-IV) to which it
was assigned; names of such species are also given in bold letters. Further explanations on the main text. Taxonomic ordering follows
AOU (2018).
On the other hand, Short-tailed Hawk's breeding traits
such as duration of the post-edging dependency period
and nest defense behaviors diverge not only among the
dierent subspecies but even within the same country
(Monsalvo 2012).
e species formerly called the Gray Hawk was
separated into two species by Millsap et al. (2011),
amendment accepted by the AOU (Remsen-Jr. et al.
2018). However, most recent studies of Buteo nitidus,
all published prior to this split (e.g., Patrikeev 2007,
Ruvalcaba-Ortega & González-Rojas 2009), focused on
the current northern species (Gray Hawk, B. plagiatus).
us, the status of the Gray-lined Hawk (B. nitidus
sensu AOU) remains the same. Although the number of
references found was similar (ten and seven, respectively;
Appendix I), information about Gray Hawks comes
from almost 100 breeding events, at about ten dierent
locations. Whereas for Gray-lined Hawks, only six
records were found, and some of these informations
could not have their localities conrmed. Such lack of
detail prevented us from determining if data on the eggs
of the latter species provided in recent literature (Sick
1997, Reichle et al. 2003) do not, in fact, refer to the
northern species eggs.
Review of breeding biology of Neotropical Accipitriformes
Monsalvo et al.
159
Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia 26(2): 2018 Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia 26(2): 2018
Based on the criteria put forward before (see
“Categories and scoring criteria, and major changes
in classication” in the Methods), the highest priority
species for research on their breeding aspects are, as
follow: White-collared Kite Leptodon forbesi, Plumbeous
Hawk Cryptoleucopteryx plumbea, and the White-necked
Hawk Buteogallus lacernulatus (Group I); Black-and-
chestnut Eagle Spizaetus isidori, Gundlach's Hawk
Accipiter gundlachi, Chaco Eagle, Gray-backed Hawk,
and Rufous-tailed Hawk (Group II); Gray-bellied Hawk,
Semicollared Hawk Accipiter collaris, Rufous Crab Hawk
and Mantled Hawk Pseudastur polionotus (Group III);
and the two island species of Buteo hawks (Ridgway's
B. ridgwayi and Galapagos B. galapagoensis), four eagles
(Crested Morphnus guianensis, Harpy Harpia harpyja,
Ornate Hawk-Eagle Spizaetus ornatus and Solitary Eagle),
Gray-headed Kite Leptodon cayanensis, Tiny Hawk,
Slate-colored Hawk Buteogallus schistaceus, and the three
Leucopternis hawks (Group IV).
Despite recent reviews considered HBW as
informative of the state-of-the-art (Trejo et al. 2006, Xiao
et al. 2016), we concluded that information provided
in the “Breeding” topic in this reference is outdated
for at least 18 of the 56 species that we analyzed. In
the WikiAves database, we compiled a total of 174
photographic records representing breeding aspects, for
18 of the 25 species surveyed (Appendix V). No reliable
records were available for the remainder of the species.
For one of these 18 species, Gray-bellied Goshawk, which
had detailed literature records of only one or two breeding
pairs (de Vries & Melo 2000, orstrom 2002, Boesing et
al. 2012), inclusion of data from WikiAves augmented its
assessment score (Table 2).
Another species for which WikiAves allowed a
change in the assigned score was the White-collared Kite,
whose only nesting record (Brito 2013, also quoted by
HBW) is posted on that platform. It is also noteworthy
the case of the Rufous-thighed Kite, for which WikiAves
provides 42 records of at least 15 distinct breeding events
in six dierent states of Brazil, including pairs with nesting
accompanied throughout, and even in consecutive years.
In addition to these three species, another ve showed
a signicant increase in breeding records from South
America, although these not have allowed an eective
change in their scores (Table 2).
We located 729 egg sets from the Neotropical
Table 2. Results of the search for photographic breeding records from the WikiAves database, for 25 species of Neotropical
Accipitriformes.
Species Change in
score(s) Comments
Elanus leucurus No Many records of dierent stages and populations, but did not change
status.
Chondrohierax uncinatus No Only three or four breeding pairs; always more southernly records.
Leptodon cayanensis No Only one nest, not monitored.
Leptodon forbesi Nest = 1 e rst nest of the species, also cited in HBW.
Spizaetus melanoleucus No Little informative and poorly distributed records.
Rostrhamus sociabilis No Many records of dierent stages and populations, but did not change
status.
Helicolestes hamatus No Only two breeding localities, records of later breeding stages.
Harpagus bidentatus No ree records from the same locality, presumably of the same pair.
Harpagus diodon No Some breeding events monitored thoroughly, including same pair in
dierent years.
Accipiter poliogaster Nest = 3 Little informative and always more southernly records.
Accipiter superciliosus No Nothing.
Accipiter bicolor No Only three records, with no new information on subspecies.
Geranospiza caerulescens No Very diverse breeding stages, especially of the subspecies exipes.
Buteogallus schistaceus No Nothing.
Buteogallus anthracinus No Only one nest, no new information.
Review of breeding biology of Neotropical Accipitriformes
Monsalvo et al.
160
Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia 26(2): 2018 Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia 26(2): 2018
Species Change in
score(s) Comments
Buteogallus aequinoctialis No One copulation record.
Buteogallus lacernulatus No No reliable records.
Parabuteo leucorrhous No Nothing.
Pseudastur polionotus No Only one nest, not monitored.
Pseudastur albicollis No Only two nests, no new information.
Leucopternis melanops No Nothing.
Leucopternis kuhli No Nothing.
Buteo nitidus No Some poorly distributed records.
Buteo brachyurus No Many records of dierent stages and populations, but did not change
status.
Buteo albonotatus No No reliable records.
Change in score(s) = whether scores assigned previously in our review, for the two categories concerning reproduction (“Nest” and “Breeding
Behavior”, see Table 1) augmented with inclusion of data from WikiAves. Shaded cells denote any substantial addition of new information, relative
to recent literature.
region in egg collections, besides six records of eggs laid
in captivity in this same region. Of these 729, 706 could
be soundly assigned to some species (Table 3), from
which 58% pertain to only four species: White-tailed
Kite, Common Black Hawk, Roadside Hawk Rupornis
magnirostris, and Gray Hawk. Around 88% of the total
of clutches of these four species were collected in Mexico.
is country is also the origin of almost two-thirds of the
egg sets of all 31 species reliably identied in museum
collections. Argentina and Chile are respectively the
second and third countries with more collected clutches,
but each represents less than 10% of the total.
We propose a correction in the identication of four
clutches, all in the WFVZ collection and all previously
recognized as misidentied by L. Ki (Appendix VI).
From our analyses, we conclude that their correct
identications probably agree with those tentatively
suggested by him in the data slips accompanying these
egg sets. We highlight the relevance of the egg sets
assigned to White-rumped and Gray-lined Hawks, as
they almost doubled the number of breeding reports for
each of these species. Overall appearance and dimensions
from the former's eggs are similar to those reported by
Zilio & Mendonça-Lima (2012), the only other clutch
known for the White-rumped Hawk, but museum eggs
are slightly larger.
Unfortunately, the clutches of Gray-lined Hawk
that we located are essentially the same widely used as
reference for this species (Belcher & Smooker 1934), yet
their measurements are within the range described for the
allospecies Gray Hawk B. plagiatus (del Hoyo et al. 2016).
Also relevant are egg sets from the subspecies
Gampsonyx swainsoni magnus (n = 1) and Rostrhamus
sociabilis major (n = 7), both largely absent in recent
literature. We also located ve clutches of the Mangrove
Black Hawk (former Buteogallus subtilis), for which
Bierregaard-Jr. (1995) found no breeding information
in literature (but see Wetmore 1965). Likewise, in our
literature review we located only poorly detailed, scattered
reports of nesting in a few localities of its range (Barrantes
1998, Pérez-León 2007, Alava et al. 2011). Relative to
recent literature, museum eggs allowed a substantial
increase in breeding information for a total of six species.
DISCUSSION
Breeding knowledge is not yet uniformly distributed
across dierent regions for most species of Neotropical
Accipitridae, with many areas lacking more studies about
their populations or subspecies. e main evidence of this
poor distribution of breeding data is the fact that we have
not assigned any new score of 5 (i.e., detailed information
coming from the entire range). Information on many
South American Accipitridae is still scant, even after
two decades (Bierregaard-Jr. 1995). With exception of a
few restricted-range subspecies, most of the least-studied
populations occur in mid-latitudes of South America or
in the Amazon Basin, a situation that barely improved in
the last eight decades (Baker 1938, Xiao et al. 2016).
e regions where most quality-research are still
concentrated are near the limits of many species ranges.
Review of breeding biology of Neotropical Accipitriformes
Monsalvo et al.
161
Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia 26(2): 2018 Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia 26(2): 2018
Table 3. Results of the search for museum egg records of Neotropical Accipitriformes.
Species No. of sets Comments
Elanus leucurus 65 Mostly from Mexico; also southern South America.
Gampsonyx swainsonii 2 From Colombia and Peru; the latter of subspecies G. s. magnus.
Chondrohierax uncinatus 8 All from Mexico; eggs from Trinidad were misidentied.
Leptodon cayanensis 5 ree of these were misidentied as other species.
Elanoides forcatus 4 From Brazil and Venezuela.
Morphnus guianensis 1From Panama; presumably from the wild but no further details
known.
Harpia harpyja 1 From Amazon Basin; plus 6 clutches laid in captivity.
Spizaetus ornatus 1 From Guatemala, at the same site of Peregrine Fund's Maya Project.
Busarellus nigricollis 4 All sets but one from Paraguay.
Rostrhamus sociabilis 34 Most from South American countries; seven clutches of R. s. major.
Ictinia plumbea 18 Records from throughout the species' range.
Circus cinereus 7 All sets from Chile.
Circus buoni 6 All sets but one from Argentina.
Accipiter bicolor 3 One misidentied clutch was discarded (Lloyd & Ki 1999).
Geranospiza caerulescens 5 All sets from Mexico.
Buteogallus anthracinus 100 90% from Mexico; ve clutches of “Mangrove Black Hawk”.
Buteogallus meridionalis 25 Around half from Mexico and the other half from South America.
Buteogallus urubitinga 14 Mostly from Mexico; also northern South America.
Buteogallus solitarius 1 From Mexico.
Rupornis magnirostris 142 Mostly from Mexico; others scattered throughout the species' range.
Parabuteo unicinctus 43 Mostly from Mexico.
Parabuteo leucorrhous 4 Largely increased the total number of breeding reports.
Geranoaetus albicaudatus 10 Records scattered through the species' range.
Geranoaetus polyosoma 43 Only one set from its northern range; 11 from the Falkland Islands.
Geranoaetus melanoleucus 23 All sets from its southern range.
Pseudastur albicollis 1From Trinidad.
Buteo plagiatus 104 All sets but one from Mexico.
Buteo nitidus 3All from Trinidad; seemingly no other eggs of the species are known.
Buteo brachyurus 13 All sets but one from Mexico.
Buteo galapagoensis 5 No new information added.
Buteo albonotatus 10 From its northern range.
No. of sets = number of soundly identied egg sets. Shaded cells denote any substantial addition of information, relative
to recent literature. Further explanations on the main text.
Review of breeding biology of Neotropical Accipitriformes
Monsalvo et al.
162
Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia 26(2): 2018 Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia 26(2): 2018
Some aspects of the behavior of a species could be
geographically restricted (iollay 1989), and its breeding
aspects can be distinct at extreme limits of its geographical
distribution (Kennedy et al. 1995). us, generalizations
about the breeding biology of raptors become highly
susceptible to errors (Bierregaard-Jr. 1995, Trejo 2007a).
Albeit results show that the informative potential of
geographically isolated data and anecdotal descriptions
may be important contributions to our knowledge on
raptors breeding ecology (Whitacre & Burnham 2012),
we emphasize the importance of conducting detailed
studies with dierent populations.
Most recent studies that provide some new
information on breeding aspects of Neotropical
Accipitriformes are generalist in nature. e lack of detail
of anecdotal reports may be due to logistical limitations
during eld work and to the studies scope, but it is
also likely that it is often due to unawareness by local
researchers of the relevance of the material. Whichever the
reason, an emblematic outcome of this, is one occasional
report of “breeding” that, if well described, would be
the rst description on any reproductive aspect of the
Black- faced Hawk Leucopternis melanops (Cintra & Naka
2012). Because of the lack of detailed information, this
report could not be properly attributed by us to any of the
categories assessed (Table 1). Additionally, it is possible
that such lack of detail may be caused by imperfections
in the peer-review system (Figueroa, in litt.), or in
publication policies of the journals, that does not give the
opportunity to the publishing of complete information
on natural history, or disregard the value of local breeding
data.
A few of the less abundant and restricted-range
species still attract most of the attention of eld
ornithologists. Bierregaard-Jr. (1995) already remarked
on the oddness of a scarcity of breeding information for
some common species, while a few, and not necessarily
common ones (e.g., Harpy Eagle), are increasingly well
studied. For example, knowledge about the breeding
behavior of the Gray-headed Kite, a conspicuous and
widespread species (orstrom et al. 2012), is still mostly
anecdotal (Table 1, Appendix I). Figueroa (2015) stated
that among potential causes for these information gaps of
common raptors, may be the species own “commonness”,
associated with a number of other biases of research focus
in ornithology. On the other hand, knowledge of all
the former “Leucopternis” species still can be considered
the largest gap of breeding data among Neotropical
Accipitridae, from Bierregaard-Jr.'s 1995 review up to
date.
We noted that records posted in the WikiAves
database could attenuate gaps in knowledge about some
raptors in middle latitudes of South America. However,
possibly the weakest point of this database is precisely
its geographical limitation to Brazil. We believe that the
development of similar initiatives in other Neotropical
countries should be helpful as a complementary measure
to elucidate diverse information on the biology of this
region's avifauna (Lees & Martin 2014). We also stress
the importance of the use of digital records in such citizen
science tools, making possible for the researchers the
correction of misidentications. It is particularly relevant
when it comes to diurnal raptors, a group renowned for
having problematic identication in the eld (Griths
& Bates 2002, Seipke et al. 2006, 2011), leading to
errors in citizen science records (Bailey 2015) and even in
published peer-reviewed studies (de Vries & Melo 2002,
Alves et al. 2017).
We also reinforce the importance of “conventional
records in museums (McNair 1987), as they oer the same
benets as exposed above. ey make possible to verify
previous identications (e.g., Griths & Bates 2002,
Appendix VI) and therefore prevent the perpetuation of
cascading errors. By using museum egg sets, this study
and others (Murphy 1989, Olsen & Marples 1993, Hayes
2014) also gathered breeding data that could not be
obtained from other sources, such as literature. Such fact
is clearly illustrated in the cases of taxa with substantial
increases in number of breeding records after the scrutiny
of oological collections (see Table 3).
Museum data on some diurnal raptors can yet
be very limited. For instance, we stress the need for
collecting additional information on eggs of both White-
rumped and Gray-lined Hawks, since our validation of
the identication of their museum sets must be seen as
conditional. In fact, sometimes the very same egg sets
we analyzed are the only (or at least the major) source
for egg measurements of a species provided by any
reference. In such cases, only by carefully scrutinizing all
references ever produced on a given species, and also by
examining closely-related species, it is possible to avoid
circular reasoning in validating the identication of these
eggs. Perhaps some species' eggs still are unknown, if
literature information are based in sets with questionable
identication.
We also veried that oological collections undergo
the same geographic bias found in both recent and
former (Bierregaard-Jr. 1995) literature breeding records.
Essentially the same regions (i.e., northernmost and
southernmost Neotropical countries, and the United
States) predominate with respect to amount of breeding
data. Trinidad and Tobago is an exception to this pattern,
because the work of egg collectors (e.g., Belcher &
Smooker 1934) seems to be the ultimate source of almost
all reproductive information on its raptors (Herklotts
1961, Ffrench 1991). In fact, no recent literature reference
was found for this country.
Adequate knowledge of breeding parameters is
necessary to better understand how dierent species and
populations respond to environmental changes (Marini
Review of breeding biology of Neotropical Accipitriformes
Monsalvo et al.
163
Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia 26(2): 2018 Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia 26(2): 2018
et al. 2010, D'Elia et al. 2015). Such information is
particularly relevant for diurnal raptors, as they: provide
important environmental services, preying upon
potential pests and invasive species (Estes et al. 2011,
Speziale & Lambertucci 2013, Martins & Donatelli
2014); act as agship species (Sergio et al. 2008, Donázar
et al. 2016); and as indicators of environmental quality
(Jullien & iollay 1996, Blendinger et al. 2004, iollay
2007). Recent studies (e.g., Alexandrino et al. 2016) are
putting in check traditional classications of sensitivity
to disturbance, widely used for Neotropical avifauna,
such as the landmark database by Stotz et al. (1996). In
fact, despite some valuable eorts (e.g., Jullien & iollay
1996, iollay 2007), little is actually known about the
extent to which each species of Neotropical raptor ts in
the sensitivity gradient (Bierregaard-Jr. 1995, Touchton et
al. 2002, Roda & Pereira 2006).
As mentioned before, nest site choices of Accipitridae
demonstrate habitat use (Ferguson-Lees & Christie
2001), and so highlight their sensitivity to environmental
changes (Trejo 2007a). en again, recent studies
indicate a need to update classications of sensitivity to
habitat change of some Accipitridae. For example, Harpy
Eagles and Short-tailed Hawks have an alleged need for
nest sites in relatively pristine native forest (Albuquerque
1995). Yet, such allegation does not match a series of
recent breeding records that demonstrate a much greater
degree of tolerance, with successful nesting reported at
human-altered habitats (Silva 2007, Monsalvo 2012,
and references therein). ese recent reports also showed
that both prey delivery rates and edgling success in
such situations are similar or higher than those on more
pristine habitats. Nonetheless, nesting in such modied
conditions might lead to still undetected impacts, like
higher nest predation risks (Newton 2010). us, further
studies are necessary, to verify the occurrence of possible
negative eects.
Open-country raptors are generally considered
to be less threatened than forest species (e.g., Piana &
Marsden 2014), as mentioned by Bierregaard-Jr. (1995).
In fact, recent research shows that suitable habitats for
species such as the Roadside Hawk might increase with
anthropogenic changes (Carrete et al. 2009), and lead
to a substantial rise in nest productivity, in human-
modied habitats (Panasci & Whitacre 2002). On the
other hand, we also retrieved studies that claim that other
raptors of open habitats may be negatively impacted by
changes in land use. roughout the Americas, species
such as Cinereous Harriers (Circus cinereus) (Camilotti
et al. 2008), Chaco Eagles (Albuquerque et al. 2006),
and even White-tailed Hawks (Brown & Glinski 2009)
are apparently losing breeding areas. In any case, there
is a shortage of data about how environmental changes
aect the breeding of dierent species and populations.
So, for proper management of such potentially aected
populations, additional research on reproductive rates is
essential.
e relevance of studying generalist and abundant
species should not be disregarded, given the extremely
signicant participation of raptors in trophic webs
(Estes et al. 2011). Breeding range expansions have been
reported recently for some generalist species, such as some
Buteo hawks (Williams-III et al. 2007, Sandoval 2009).
ese expansions result in insertion of these raptors into
new food webs, interacting with populations of prey
species with which they had no previous contact. Some
Accipitriformes can prey upon introduced or invasive
species (Wheeler 2003, Pineda-López et al. 2012,
Martins & Donatelli 2014), and the eects of the latter
on breeding parameters of native predators still require
further research (Speziale & Lambertucci 2013). For
instance, in Snail Kite breeding areas the introduction
of an alien novel prey increased reproductive success
(Cattau et al. 2016), highlighting the ecological relevance
of raptor species.
is assessment of current knowledge of the
breeding biology of Neotropical Accipitriformes
indicated that, albeit 66% of the evaluated species had
some improvement on levels of knowledge, the scarcity
of breeding data on many South American Accipitridae
persists. Yet, we noted that records from both a citizen
science digital database and oological collections resulted
in a signicant increase in breeding information for a
total of 13 species, relative to recent literature. ere is a
persistent need for research to be conducted north of the
Southern Cone of South America, and we recommend
that breeding biology studies should focus on the 24
species selected as research priorities. Knowledge of the
breeding biology of Accipitridae not only plays a key role
in enabling proper management and conservation of their
populations. It also will point the way for more ecient
studies in the future, generating better data about the
biology of these predators and, in the nal analysis, on
the functioning of ecosystems as a whole (Bierregaard-Jr.
1995, Trejo 2007a).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
J.A.B.M. and M.Â.M. thank Conselho Nacional de
Desenvolvimento Cientíco e Tecnológico (CNPq) for
their master's and researcher fellowships, respectively.
N.M.H. thanks Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de
Pessoal de Nível Superior (PNPD/Capes) for a post-doc
fellowship. We thank J. Holfeltz from the Peregrine
Fund for sending us pdf's, and Ryan Phillips and R.A.
Figueroa for sending us reprints and sharing information.
We also thank the latter, R.O. Bierregaard-Jr., and other
reviewers, for suggestions that greatly improved the
manuscript.
Review of breeding biology of Neotropical Accipitriformes
Monsalvo et al.
164
Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia 26(2): 2018 Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia 26(2): 2018
REFERENCES
Alava J.J., Saavedra M., Arosemena X., Calle M., Vinueza C., Jiménez
P.J., Carvajal R. & Vargas F.H. 2011. Distributional records
and potential threats to the Common (Mangrove) Black Hawk
(Buteogallus anthracinus subtilis) in southwestern Ecuador. Boletín
SAO 20: 18‒28.
Albuquerque J.L.B. 1995. Observations of rare raptors in southern
Atlantic Rainforest of Brazil. Journal of Field Ornithology 66:
363–369.
Albuquerque J.L.B., Ghizoni-Jr. I.R., Silva E.S., Trannini G., Franz
I., Barcellos A., Hassdenteufel C.B., Arend F.L. & Martins-
Ferreira C. 2006. Águia-cinzenta (Harpyhaliaetus coronatus) e o
Gavião-real-falso (Morphnus guianensis) em Santa Catarina e Rio
Grande do Sul: prioridades e desaos para sua conservação. Revista
Brasileira de Ornitologia 14: 411–415.
Alexandrino E.R., Buechley E.R., Piratelli J.A., Ferraz K.M.P.M.B.,
Moral R.A., Şekercioğlu Ç.H., Silva W.R. & Couto H.T.Z. 2016.
Bird sensitivity to disturbance as an indicator of forest patch
conditions: an issue in environmental assessments. Ecological
Indicators 66: 369–381.
Alvarado S.A.A., Figueroa R.A., Faúndez P.V., Carrasco-Lagos P. &
Moreno R.A. 2015. Aves rapaces de la Región Metropolitana de
Santiago, Chile. Santiago: Universidad de Chile.
Alves M.A.S., Vecchi M.B., Vallejos L.M., Ribeiro E.A., Martins-Silva
J. & Saint Clair R.S. 2017. New records of bird species from Ilha
Grande, state of Rio de Janeiro, southeastern Brazil. Check List
12: Erratum.
Amaral F.R., Sheldon F.H., Gamauf A., Haring E., Riesing M., Silveira
L.F. & Wajntal A. 2009. Patterns and processes of diversication in
a widespread and ecologically diverse avian group, the buteonine
hawks (Aves, Accipitridae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
53: 703–715.
Angehr G.R. 2006. Annotated checklist of the birds of Panama. Panamá:
Panama Audubon Society.
Antas P.T.Z. 2004. Pantanal: guia de aves: espécies da Reserva Particular do
Patrimônio Natural do SESC Pantanal. Rio de Janeiro: SESC Nacional.
Arballo E. & Cravino J.L. 1999. Aves del Uruguay: manual ornitológico,
v. 1. Montevideo: Editorial Hemisferio Sur.
Bailey A. 2015. Checklist S26817426. https://ebird.org/view/checklist/
S26817426 (Access on 06 March 2018).
Baker J.R. 1938. e relation between latitude and breeding seasons
in birds. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, Series A
108: 557‒582.
Barrantes G. 1998. Reproductive activity of birds in a mangrove
swamp in northwest Costa Rica. Revista de Biología Tropical 46:
1163‒1166.
Béczy T.L. 1971. Catalogue of the oological collection of the museum in
Oradea. Oradea: Cris-Rivers Region Musem.
Belcher C. & Smooker G.D. 1934. Birds of the colony of Trinidad
and Tobago. Ibis 76: 572‒595.
Bellatti J. 2000. Comportamiento y abundancia relativa de rapaces
de la Patagonia extraandina argentina. Ornitología Neotropical 11:
207‒222.
Bierregaard-Jr. R.O. 1995. e biology and conservation status of
Central and South American Falconiformes: a survey of current
knowledge. Bird Conservation International 5: 325–340.
Bird D., Varland D. & Negro J. 1996. Raptors in human landscapes:
adaptations to built and cultivated environments. London:
Academic Press.
Blendinger P.G., Capllonch P. & Alvarez M.E. 2004. Abundance and
distribution of raptors in the Sierra de San Javier Biological Park,
northwestern Argentina. Ornitología Neotropical 15: 501–512.
Bodrati A., Cockle K., Segovia J.M., Roesler I., Areta J.I. & Jordan
E. 2010. La avifauna del Parque Provincial Cruce Caballero,
provincia de Misiones, Argentina. Cotinga 32: 41–64.
Boesing L.A., Menq W. & Anjos L. 2012. First description of
the reproductive biology of the Gray-Bellied Hawk (Accipiter
poliogaster). Wilson Journal of Ornithology 124: 767–774.
Bridge E.S., Boughton R.K., Aldredge R.A., Harrison T.J.E., Bowman
R. & Schoech S.J. 2007. Measuring egg size using digital
photography: testing Hoyt's method using Florida Scrub-Jay eggs.
Journal of Field Ornithology 78: 109–116.
Brito C.B. 2013. WA938449, Leptodon forbesi (Swann, 1922). http://
www.wikiaves.com/938449 (Access on 24 October 2016).
Brown D.E. & Glinski R.L. 2009. e status of the White-tailed
Hawk in Arizona and Sonora, Mexico. Journal of the Arizona-
Nevada Academy of Science 41: 8‒15.
Cabot J. & de Vries T. 2004. Age and sex-dierentiated plumages in the
two colour morphs of the Variable Buzzard Buteo polyosoma: a case
of delayed maturation with subadult males disguised in denitive
adult female plumage. Bulletin of the British Ornithologists' Club
124: 272‒285.
Cabot-Nieves J., de Vries T., Alonso C.U. & Reyes M.D.P. 2013.
Primeros datos sobre el período de incubación y crecimiento de
los pichones del Aguilucho Común (Geranoaetus polyosoma, Quoy
& Gaimard 1824) en cautiverio. Acta Zoologica Lilloana 57: 187–
200.
Camilotti V.L., Krügel M.M. & Hatz S.M. 2008. Nidicação de
Circus cinereus (Aves, Accipitridae) na região da fronteira oeste do
Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia 16:
363–365.
Carrete M., Tella J.L., Blanco G. & Bertellotti M. 2009. Eects of
habitat degradation on the abundance, richness and diversity of
raptors across Neotropical biomes. Biological Conservation 142:
2002–2011.
Cattau C.E., Fletcher-Jr. R.J., Reichert B.E. & Kitchens W.M. 2016.
Counteracting eects of a non-native prey on the demography
of a native predator culminate in positive population growth.
Ecological Applications 26: 1952–1968.
Cavicchia M. & García G.V. 2012. Riqueza y composición de especies
de aves rapaces (Falconiformes y Strigiformes) de la ciudad de
Buenos Aires, Argentina. Hornero 27: 159‒166.
Cintra R. & Naka L.N. 2012. Spatial variation in bird community
composition in relation to topographic gradient and forest
heterogeneity in a central Amazonian Rainforest. International
Journal of Ecology 2012: 435671.
Cisneros-Heredia D.F. 2006. Notes on breeding, behaviour and
distribution of some birds in Ecuador. Bulletin of the British
Ornithologists' Club 126: 153‒164.
Cortés G.D., Rodríguez-Cajarville M.J., Azpiroz A.B. & Maier M.
2013. Estado del conocimiento sobre las aves rapaces de Uruguay.
Ornitología Neotropical 24: 243–256.
D'Elia J., Haig S.M., Johnson M., Marcot B.G. & Young R.
2015. Activity-specic ecological niche models for planning
reintroductions of California Condors (Gymnogyps californianus).
Biological Conservation 184: 90‒99.
de la Peña M.R. 2005. Reproducción de las aves argentinas (con
descripción de pichones). Buenos Aires: Editorial L.O.L.A.
de Labra M.A., Escalante P. & Monterrubio-Rico P.E.T. 2013.
Diurnal raptors in Los Tuxtlas Biosphere Reserve, Mexico: current
presence and relative abundance. Journal of Raptor Research 47:
392–399.
de Vries T. & Melo C. 2000. First nesting record of the nest of a Slaty-
backed Forest-falcon (Micrastur mirandollei) in Yasuní National
Park, Ecuadorian Amazon. Journal of Raptor Research 34: 148–
150.
de Vries T. & Melo C. 2002. Micrastur or Accipiter, that is the question.
Journal of Raptor Research 36: 337.
del Hoyo J., Elliott A., Sargatal J., Christie D.A. & de Juana E. 2016.
Handbook of the birds of the world alive. http://www.hbw.com
(Access on 24 October 2016).
Review of breeding biology of Neotropical Accipitriformes
Monsalvo et al.
165
Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia 26(2): 2018 Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia 26(2): 2018
Denis D., García A. & Olavarrieta U. 2013. Descripción de los huevos
de Aura Tiñosa (Cathartes aura) en Cuba. Journal of Caribbean
Ornithology 26: 33–38.
Dickinson E.C. & Remsen-Jr. J.V.. 2013. e Howard and Moore
complete checklist of the birds of the world, v. 1. Eastborn: Aves Press.
Donázar J.A., Cortés-Avizanda A., Fargallo J.A., Margalida A.,
Moleón M., Morales-Reyes Z., Moreno-Opo R., Pérez-García
J.M., Sánchez-Zapata J.A., Zuberogoitia I. & Serrano D. 2016.
Roles of raptors in a changing world: from agships to providers
of key ecosystem services. Ardeola 63: 181‒234.
Draheim G.S., Whitacre D.F., Enamorado A.M., Aguirre O.A. &
Hernández A.E. 2012. White Hawk, p. 120‒137. In: Whitacre
D.F. (ed.). Neotropical birds of prey: biology and ecology of a forest
raptor community. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Eisermann K. & Avendaño C. 2007. Annotated checklist of the birds of
Guatemala. Barcelona: Lynx Editions.
Estes J.A., Terborgh J., Brashares J.S., Power M.E., Berger J., Bond
W.J., Carpenter S.R., Essington T.E., Holt R.D., Jackson J.B.C.,
Marquis R.J., Oksanen L., Oksanen T., Paine R.T., Pikitch E.K.,
Ripple W.J., Sandin S.A., Scheer M., Schoener T.W., Shurin J.B.,
Sinclair A.R.E., Soulé M.E., Virtanen R. & Wardle D.A. 2011.
Trophic downgrading of Planet Earth. Science 333: 301–306.
Ferguson-Lees J. & Christie D.A. 2001. Raptors of the world. London:
Christopher Helm.
Ffrench R. 1991. A guide to the birds of Trinidad and Tobago. New
York: Comstock Publishing Associates.
Figueroa R.A. 2015. El rapaz olvidado - ¿Por qué hay tan pocos
estudios sobre la historia natural y ecología básica del Tiuque
(Milvago chimango) en Chile? Boletín Chileno de Ornitología 21:
103‒118.
Fontana C.S., Bencke G.A. & Reis R.E. 2003. Livro vermelho da
fauna ameaçada de extinção no Rio Grande do Sul. Porto Alegre:
EDIPUCRS.
Freile J.F. 2005. Gustavo Orcés, Fernando Ortiz y el desarrollo de
la ornitología hecha em Ecuador. Ornitología Neotropical 16:
321‒336.
Freile J.F., Greeney H.F. & Bonaccorso E. 2014. Current Neotropical
ornithology: research progress 1996–2011. Condor 116: 84–96.
Gelis R.A. & Greeney H.F. 2007. Nesting of Barred Hawk (Leucopternis
princeps) in northeast Ecuador. Ornitología Neotropical 18: 607–
612.
Greeney H.F. & Nunnery T. 2006. Notes on the breeding of north-
west Ecuadorian birds. Bulletin of the British Ornithologists' Club
126: 38‒45.
Griths C.S. & Bates J.M. 2002. Morphology, genetics and the value
of voucher specimens: an example with Cathartes vultures. Journal
of Raptor Research 36: 183‒187.
Gussoni C.O.A. & Guaraldo A.C. 2008. Aves do câmpus da UNESP
em Rio Claro. Rio Claro: author's edition.
Hayes F.E. 2014. Breeding season and clutch size of birds at Sapucái,
departamento Paraguarí, Paraguay. Boletín del Museo Nacional de
Historia del Paraguay 18: 77‒97.
Hellmayr C.E. & Conover B. 1949. Catalogue of birds of the Americas
and the adjacent islands in Field Museum of Natural History, Part
1. Field Museum of Natural History, Zoological Series 13: 1–358.
Heming N.M., Greeney H.F. & Marini M.Â. 2013. Breeding biology
research and data availability for New World ycatchers. Natureza
& Conservação 11: 54–58.
Hennessey A.B., Herzog S.A., Kessler M. & Robison D. 2003.
Avifauna of the Pilón Lajas Biosphere Reserve and Communal
Lands, Bolivia. Bird Conservation International 13: 319–349.
Herklots G.A.C. 1961. e birds of Trinidad and Tobago. London:
Collins.
Höing E. & Camargo H.F.A. 2002. Aves no Campus da Cidade
Universitária Armando Salles de Oliveira. São Paulo: Edusp/
Instituto de Biociências.
IUCN. 2017. e IUCN Red List of reatened Species. Version 2017-
3. http://www.iucnredlist.org (Access on 18 December 2017).
Jiménez J.E. 1995. Historia natural del Aguilucho Buteo polyosoma:
una revisión. Hornero 14: 1‒9.
Jullien M. & iollay J. 1996. Eects of rain forest disturbance and
fragmentation: comparative changes of the raptor community
along natural and human-made gradients in French Guiana.
Journal of Biogeography 23: 7–25.
Kennedy P.L., Crowe D.E. & Dean T.F. 1995. Breeding biology of the
Zone-tailed Hawk at the limit of its distribution. Journal of Raptor
Research 29: 110‒116.
Krüger O. 2000. Correlates of population density and body weight of
raptors in the family Accipitridae: a comparative study. Journal of
Zoology 250: 185–191.
Krüger O. & Radford A.N. 2008. Doomed to die? Predicting
extinction risk in the true hawks Accipitridae. Animal Conservation
11: 83–91.
Lees A.C. & Martin R.W. 2014. Exposing hidden endemism in a
Neotropical forest raptor using citizen science. Ibis 157: 103–114.
Lortie C.J., Aarssen L.W., Budden A.E., Koricheva J.K., Leimu R. &
Tregenza T. 2007. Publication bias and merit in ecology. Oikos
116: 1247–1253.
Machado A.B.M., Fonseca G.A.B., Machado R.B., Aguiar L.M.S. &
Lins L.V. 1998. Livro vermelho das espécies ameaçadas de extinção
da fauna de Minas Gerais. Belo Horizonte: Fundação Biodiversitas.
Marini M.Â., Barbet-Massin M., Martinez J., Prestes N.P. & Jiguet
F. 2010. Applying ecological niche models to plan conservation
actions for the Red-spectacled Amazon (Amazona pretrei).
Biological Conservation 143: 102‒112.
Márquez C., Bechard M., Gast F. & Vanegas V.H. 2005. Aves rapaces
diurnas de Colombia. Bogotá: Instituto de Investigación de
Recursos Biológicos “Alexander von Humboldt”.
Martins R.M. & Donatelli R.J. 2014. Predação de Caramujo-
africano (Achatina fulica) pelo Gavião-caracoleiro (Chondrohierax
uncinatus) em Pirajuí, interior do estado de São Paulo. Atualidades
Ornitológicas 178: 6–8.
McNair D.B. 1987. Egg data slips: are they useful for information on
egg-laying dates and clutch size? Condor 89: 369‒376.
Medel-Hidalgo J., Rivas-Fuenzalida T., Asciones-Contreras N. &
Figueroa R.A. 2015. Nest site descriptions for Chilean Hawks
(Accipiter chilensis) in the Valdivian coastal range, southern Chile.
Boletín Chileno de Ornitología 21: 59‒65.
Mikich S.B. & Bérnils R.S. 2004. Livro vermelho da fauna ameaçada
no estado do Paraná. Curitiba: Instituto Ambiental do Paraná.
Millsap B.A., Seipke S.H. & Clark W.S. 2011. e Gray Hawk (Buteo
nitidus) is two species. Condor 113: 326–339.
Monsalvo J.A.B. 2012. Reprodução de Buteo brachyurus em um parque
urbano de São Paulo, sudeste do Brasil. Atualidades Ornitológicas
170: 33–40.
Muela A. & Valdez U. 2003. First report of the nest of the Barred
Hawk (Leucopternis princeps) in Panama. Ornitología Neotropical
14: 267–268.
Murphy M.T. 1989. Life history variability in North American
breeding tyrant ycatchers: phylogeny, size or ecology? Oikos 54:
3‒14.
NACC (North American Classication Committee). 2017. Checklist
of North and Middle American Birds. http://checklist.aou.org/taxa
(Access on 30 April 2017).
Naka L.N. & Rodrigues M. 2000. As aves da Ilha de Santa Catarina.
Florianópolis: Editora da UFSC.
Newton I. 2010. Population ecology of raptors. Vermillion: Buteo
Books.
Ojeda V., Gelain M., Sympson L. & Trejo A. 2003. Desarrollo
morfológico y conductual de pollos del Aguilucho Chico Buteo
albigula (Aves: Accipitridae) en el noroeste de la Patagonia
argentina. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural 76: 451–457.
Review of breeding biology of Neotropical Accipitriformes
Monsalvo et al.
166
Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia 26(2): 2018 Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia 26(2): 2018
Olsen P. & Marples T.G. 1993. Geographic-variation in egg size,
clutch size and date of laying of Australian raptors (Falconiformes
and Strigiformes). Emu 93: 167–179.
Oniki Y. & Willis E.O. 2002. Bibliography of Brazilian birds: 1500–
2002. Rio Claro: Divisa Editora.
Panasci T.A. & Whitacre D.F. 2002. Roadside Hawk breeding ecology
in forest and farming landscapes. Wilson Bulletin 114: 114–121.
Pardiñas U.F.J. & Cirignoli S. 2002. Bibliografía comentada sobre los
análisis de egagrópilas de aves rapaces en Argentina. Ornitología
Neotropical 13: 31–59.
Patrikeev M. 2007. Notes on the nesting of the Gray Hawk (Buteo
nitidus) in Bentsen-Rio Grande Valley State Park, Texas. Texas
Birds Annual 3: 14–15.
Pérez M.A.U. 2015. Conducta reproductiva de una pareja de águilas
chilenas (Geranoaetus melanoleucus) en la Cordillera Central de
Santiago. Bachelor's Monograph. Santiago: Universidad de Chile.
Pérez-León R.A. 2007. Composición y estructura de comunidades de aves
rapaces diurnas y sus implicaciones para sistemas agropecuarios en
paisajes fragmentados de la costa de El Salvador. MSc. Dissertation.
Turrialba: CATIE.
Piana R.P. & Marsden S.J. 2014. Impacts of cattle grazing on forest
structure and raptor distribution within a Neotropical protected
area. Biodiversity and Conservation 23: 559–572.
Pineda-López R., Morales N.F. & Martínez M. 2012. Conrmación
de la presencia del Gavilán Caracolero (Rostrhamus sociabilis) en
Jalisco, México. Huitzil 13: 39–42.
Raimilla V., Rau J.R. & Muñoz-Pedreros A. 2012. Estado de arte
del conocimiento de las aves rapaces de Chile: situación actual
y proyecciones futuras. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural 85:
469–480.
Reichle S., Justiniano H., Vides R. & Herrera M. 2003. Aves del
Bosque Chiquitano y Pantanal Boliviano. Santa Cruz de La Sierra:
Editorial FAN.
Remsen-Jr. J.V., Areta J.I., Cadena C.D., Claramunt S., Jaramillo
A., Pacheco J.F., Pérez-Emán J., Robbins M.B., Stiles F.G., Stotz
D.F. & Zimmer K.J. 2018. A classication of the bird species of
South America. Version 01 March 2018. http://www.museum.lsu.
edu/~Remsen-/SACCBaseline.htm (Access on 06 March 2018).
Rivas-Fuenzalida T., Asciones-Contreras N. & Figueroa R.A. 2015.
Estatus reproductivo del Aguilucho de Cola Remjiza (Buteo
ventralis) en el norte de su distribución en Chile. Boletín Chileno
de Ornitología 21: 50–58.
Roda S.A. & Pereira G.A. 2006. Distribuição recente e conservação
das aves de rapina orestais do Centro Pernambuco. Revista
Brasileira de Ornitologia 14: 331–344.
Román R.A. & Wiley J.W. 2012. Bird egg and nest specimens in the
collection of the Instituto de Ecología y Sistemática, La Habana,
Cuba. Journal of Caribbean Ornithology 25: 15–23.
Ruvalcaba-Ortega I. & González-Rojas J.I. 2009. New records for
Coahuila from a riparian bird community in northern Mexico.
Southwestern Naturalist 54: 501–509.
Sandoval L. 2009. Nuevos registros en la distribución de cuatro
rapaces diurnas (Accipitridae y Falconidae: Aves) en Costa Rica.
Brenesia 71–72: 79–80.
Santana E. & Temple S.A. 1988. Breeding biology and diet of Red-
tailed Hawks in Puerto Rico. Biotropica 20: 151–160.
Santos K.K. 2014. Aves da RPPN Alto-Montana. Itamonte: Instituto
Alto-Montana da Serra Fina.
Seavy N.E. & Gerhardt R.P. 1998. Breeding biology and nestling diet
of the Great Black-Hawk. Journal of Raptor Research 32: 175–177.
Seavy N.E., Schulze M.D., Whitacre D.F. & Vasquez M.A. 1998.
Breeding biology and behavior of the Plumbeous Kite. Wilson
Bulletin 110: 77–85.
Seipke S.H., Dénes F.V., Pallinger F., orstrom R., iollay J.,
Silveira L.F. & Clark W.S. 2011. Field identication of White-
collared Kite Leptodon forbesi and similar-looking species in north-
east Brazil. Neotropical Birding 8: 29–39.
Seipke S.H., Kajiwara D. & Albuerque J.B.L. 2006. Field identication
of Mantled Hawk Leucopternis polionotus. Neotropical Birding 1:
42–47.
Sergio F., Caro T., Brown D., Clucas B., Hunter J., Ketchum J.,
McHugh K. & Hiraldo F. 2008. Top predators as conservation
tools: ecological rationale, assumptions, and ecacy. Annual
Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 39: 1–19.
Sick H. 1997. Ornitologia brasileira. Rio de Janeiro: Nova Fronteira.
Sigrist T. 2006. Birds of Brazil: an artistic view. São Paulo: Avis Brasilis.
Silva F.H.A. 2007. Dieta do Gavião-real Harpia harpyja (Aves:
Accipitridae) em orestas de terra rme de Parintins, Amazonas,
Brasil. MSc. Dissertation. Manaus: Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas
da Amazônia.
Silva R.S. & Olmos F. 1997. Parabuteo unicinctus (Falconiformes:
Accipitridae) na Baixada Santista, litoral de São Paulo, Brasil.
Ararajuba 5: 76–79.
Speziale K.L. & Lambertucci S.A. 2013. e eect of introduced
species on raptors. Journal of Raptor Research 47: 133–144.
Stotz D.F., Fitzpatrick J.W., Parker-III T.A. & Moskovits D.K. 1996.
Neotropical birds: ecology and conservation. Chicago: University of
Chicago Press.
Straube F.C., Carrano E., Santos R.E.F., Scherer-Neto P., Ribas C.F.,
Meijer A.A.R., Vallejos M.A.V., Lanzer M., Klemann-Júnior
L., Aurélio-Silva M., Urben-Filho A., Arzua M., Lima A.M.X.,
Sobânia R.L.M., Deconto L.R., Bispo A.Â., Jesus S. & Abilhôa
V. 2014. Aves de Curitiba: coletânea de registros. Curitiba: Hori
Consultoria Ambiental.
Sutter J., Martínez W.E., Oliva F., Oswaldo N. & Whitacre D.F. 2001.
Diet and hunting behavior of the Crane Hawk in Tikal National
Park, Guatemala. Condor 103: 70–77.
iollay J. 1989. Censusing of diurnal raptors in a primary rain forest:
comparative methods and species detectability. Journal of Raptor
Research 23: 72–84.
iollay J. 2007. Raptor communities in French Guiana: distribution,
habitat selection, and conservation. Journal of Raptor Research 41:
90–105.
orstrom R. 2002. Comments on the rst nesting record of the
nest of a Slaty-backed Forest-falcon (Micrastur mirandollei) in the
Ecuadorian Amazon. Journal of Raptor Research 36: 335–336.
orstrom R. & Ki L.F. 1999. Notes on eggs of the Bicolored Hawk
Accipiter bicolor. Journal of Raptor Research 33: 244–247.
orstrom R. & Quixchán A. 2000. Breeding biology and nest site
characteristics of the Bicolored Hawk in Guatemala. Wilson
Bulletin 112: 195–202.
orstrom R., Whitacre D.F., Lópes J. & Lópes G. 2012. Gray-headed
Kite, p. 39–47. In: Whitacre D.F. (ed.). Neotropical birds of prey:
biology and ecology of a forest raptor community. Ithaca: Cornell
University Press.
Touchton J.M., Hsu Y.C. & Palleroni A. 2002. Foraging ecology of
reintroduced captive-bred subadult Harpy Eagles (Harpia harpyja)
on Barro Colorado Island, Panamá. Ornitología Neotropical 13:
365–379.
Trejo A. 2007a. Identicación de especies y áreas prioritarias para el
estudio de la reproducción de aves rapaces de Argentina. Hornero
22: 85–96.
Trejo A. 2007b. Bibliografía comentada sobre aves rapaces de
Argentina. Hornero 22: 185–217.
Trejo A., Figueroa R.A. & Alvarado S. 2006. Forest-specialist raptors
of the temperate forests of southern South America: a review.
Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia 14: 317–330.
Trejo A., Ojeda V. & Sympson L. 2001. First nest records of the
White-throated Hawk (Buteo albigula) in Argentina. Journal of
Raptor Research 35: 169–170.
Troscianko J. 2014. A simple tool for calculating egg shape, volume
and surface area from digital images. Ibis 156: 874–878.
Review of breeding biology of Neotropical Accipitriformes
Monsalvo et al.
167
Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia 26(2): 2018 Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia 26(2): 2018
Vargas H. 1995. Food habits, breeding biology, and status of the
Gray-backed Hawk (Leucopternis occidentalis) in western Ecuador
(Abstract). Boise State University eses and Dissertations #680.
http://scholarworks.boisestate.edu/td/680/ (Access on 24 October
2016).
Vuilleumier F. 2004. A critique of Neotropical ornithology: is research
on Neotropical birds scientic? Ornitología Neotropical 15: 41–60.
Wheeler B.K. 2003. Raptors of eastern North America. Princeton:
Princeton University Press.
Whitacre D.F. 2012. Neotropical birds of prey: biology and ecology of a
forest raptor community. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Whitacre D.F. & Burnham W.A. 2012. Ecology and conservation
of Tikal's raptor fauna, p. 328–359. In: Whitacre D.F. (ed.).
Neotropical birds of prey: biology and ecology of a forest raptor
community. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Wiley J.W. & Garrido O.H. 2005. Taxonomic status and biology of
the Cuban Black-Hawk, Buteogallus anthracinus gundlachii (Aves:
Accipitridae). Journal of Raptor Research 39: 351–364.
Williams-III S.O., Delong J.P. & Howe W.H. 2007. Northward range
expansion by the Short-tailed Hawk, with rst records for New
Mexico and Chihuahua. Western Birds 38: 2–10.
Willis E.O. & Oniki Y. 2003. Aves do estado de São Paulo. Rio Claro:
Divisa Editora.
Xiao H., Hu Y., Lang Z., Fang B., Guo W., Zhang Q., Pan X. & Lu X.
2016. How much do we know about the breeding biology of bird
species in the world? Journal of Avian Biology 48: 513‒
Zilio F. & Mendonça-Lima A. 2012. e White-rumped Hawk (Buteo
leucorrhous) in southern Brazil: status, conservation, and rst
description of the nest. Ornitología Neotropical 23: 51–61.
Associate Editor: Gustavo S. Cabanne
APPENDIX I
Literature references with breeding data of 56 species of Neotropical Accipitriformes, produced between 19952016.
Species Located references
Elanus leucurus Erichsen et al. 1996; McMillian & Pranty 1997; Pranty & McMillian 1997; Sick 1997;
Arballo & Cravino 1999; Carvalho et al. 2001b; Maceda & Kin 2001; Wheeler 2003;
Antas 2004; Leveau et al. 2004; Chatellenaz 2005; de la Peña 2005; Di Giacomo 2005;
Joppert 2007; Niemela 2007; Pérez-León 2007; Scheibler 2007; Carvalho-Filho et al.
2008; Gussoni & Guaraldo 2008; González-Acuña et al. 2009; Chatellenaz et al. 2010;
Furman & Bastías 2012; Montalvo et al. 2014; Alvarado et al. 2015; Camacho-Varela
& Acosta-Chaves 2015; Romano et al. 2015; Marsden et al. 2016.
Gampsonyx swainsonii Martínez 1998; Reichle et al. 2003; Di Giacomo 2005; Jones 2005; Strewe et al. 2009;
Sandoval et al. 2010.
Chondrohierax uncinatus Ericson & Amarilla 1997; Di Giacomo 2000; orstrom et al. 2001; Clark 2002; 2003;
Krügel 2003; Reichle et al. 2003; Clark 2004; Rappole et al. 2007; Carvalho-Filho et
al. 2008; orstrom & McQueen 2008; Canuto 2009; Whitacre 2012; Sampaio et al.
2013; Phillips et al. 2015.
Leptodon cayanensis orstrom 1997; Bornschein & Reinert 2000; Carvalho-Filho et al. 2002; Cabanne
2005; Carvalho-Filho et al. 2005; Olmos et al. 2006; Carvalho-Filho et al. 2008;
Canuto 2009; Bodrati et al. 2010; Ghizoni-Jr. & Azevedo 2010; Whitacre 2012.
Leptodon forbesi Pereira et al. 2006; Dénes 2009; Dénes et al. 2011.
Elanoides forcatus Meyer & Collopy 1995; Brown et al. 1997; Gerhardt et al. 1997; Sykes-Jr. et al. 1999;
Naka & Rodrigues 2000; Coulson 2001; Blihovde 2002; Coulson 2002; Naka et al.
2002; Willis & Oniki 2002; Reichle et al. 2003; Gerhardt et al. 2004; Meyer et al.
2004; Soehren 2004; Zimmerman 2004; Azevedo & Di Bernardo 2005; Carvalho-
Filho et al. 2008; Coulson et al. 2008; Crease 2009; Gruber 2009; Lopes et al. 2009;
Whitehead & Jones 2009; Bodrati et al. 2010; Chiavacci et al. 2011; Whitacre 2012;
Carpenter & Allen 2013; Kjeldsen 2103; Enge et al. 2014.
Morphnus guianensis Whitacre et al. 2002; Mikich & Bérnils 2004; Vargas-González et al. 2006a; Raine
2007; Cintra & Naka 2012; Whitacre 2012; Crease & Tepedino 2013; Gomes 2014;
Gomes & Sanaiotti 2015; Sanaiotti et al. 2015.
Review of breeding biology of Neotropical Accipitriformes
Monsalvo et al.
168
Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia 26(2): 2018 Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia 26(2): 2018
Species Located references
Harpia harpyja Chebez 1995; Alvarez et al. 1996; Alvarez-Cordero 1996; de Lucca 1996; Sick 1997;
Machado et al. 1998; Galetti & Carvalho 2000; Ibáñez et al. 2002; Piana 2002; Rettig
2002; Sanaiotti 2002; Hennessey et al. 2003; Peterson et al. 2003; Willis & Oniki
2003; Mikich & Bérnils 2004; Suárez et al. 2004; Luz 2005; Muñiz-López 2005;
Silveira et al. 2005; Olmos et al. 2006; Pereira & Salzo 2006; Vargas-González et al.
2006a; b; Giudice et al. 2007; Pacheco et al. 2007; Piana 2007; Silva 2007; Anfuso
et al. 2008; Trinca et al. 2008; Pinheiro & Dornas 2009; May 2010; Seymour et al.
2010; Sánchez-Lalinde et al. 2011; Ubaid et al. 2011; Vargas-González & Vargas 2011;
Aguiar-Silva et al. 2012; Cintra & Naka 2012; Muñiz-López et al. 2012; O'Shea &
Ramcharan 2012; Rotemberg et al. 2012; Aguiar-Silva et al. 2014; Vargas-González et
al. 2014; Aguiar-Silva et al. 2015; Kuniy et al. 2015; Sanaiotti et al. 2015; Sousa et al.
2015; Watson et al. 2016.
Spizaetus tyrannus Sick 1997; Olmos et al. 2006; Sigrist 2006; Lopes & Braz 2007; Canuto 2008;
Carvalho-Filho et al. 2008; Jones & Komar 2008a; Phillips 2009; Pimentel & Olmos
2011; Canuto et al. 2012; Cintra & Naka 2012; Whitacre 2012; Straube et al. 2014;
Meyer 2016.
Spizaetus melanoleucus Andrade et al. 1996; Sick 1997; Reichle et al. 2003; Anderson et al. 2004; Eisermann
2007; Canuto 2008; Carvalho-Filho et al. 2008; Canuto 2009; Phillips 2009; Phillips
& Seminario 2009; Bodrati et al. 2010; Canuto et al. 2012; Whitacre 2012; Kohler &
Rezini 2013.
Spizaetus ornatus Sick 1997; orstrom 1997; Andrade & Andrade 1998; Machado et al. 1998; Naveda-
Rodríguez 2002; Seipke & Cabanne 2002; Reichle et al. 2003; Greeney et al. 2004;
Mikich & Bérnils 2004; Naveda-Rodríguez 2004; Mendonça-Lima et al. 2006; Giudice
2007; Canuto 2008; Carvalho-Filho et al. 2008; Canuto 2009; Kirwan 2009; Phillips
2009; Joenck et al. 2011; Canuto et al. 2012; Cintra & Naka 2012; Whitacre 2012;
Joenck et al. 2013; Kjeldsen 2013; Phillips & Hatten 2013; Harvey et al. 2014.
Spizaetus isidori Valdez & Osborn 2002; Strewe & Navarro 2003; Valdez & Osborn 2004; Roesler et
al. 2008; Greeney et al. 2011; Castañeda 2012; Araóz & Alvedaño 2013; Zuluaga &
Echeverry-Galvis 2016.
Busarellus nigricollis Sick 1997; Di Giacomo 2000; Reichle et al. 2003; Willis & Oniki 2003; Antas
2004; Chatellenaz 2005; de la Peña 2005; Di Giacomo 2005; Márquez et al. 2005;
Chatellenaz et al. 2010; Knight 2010; Bertassoni et al. 2012; Evangelista et al. 2012.
Rostrhamus sociabilis Alvarez-López & Kattan 1995; Rodgers-Jr. 1996; Sick 1997; Valentine-Darby et al.
1997; Bennetts et al. 1998; Palmer 1998; Valentine-Darby et al. 1998; Angehr 1999;
Arballo & Cravino 1999; Bennetts & Kitchens 1999; Dreitz et al. 1999; Bennetts &
Kitchens 2000; Dreitz 2000; Dreitz & Duberstein 2001; Dreitz et al. 2001; Rodgers-Jr.
et al. 2001; Welch & Kitchens 2001; Beissinger & Snyder 2002; Bennetts et al. 2002;
Dreitz et al. 2002a; b; Petracci & Basanta 2002; Reichle et al. 2003; Rodgers-Jr. &
Schwikert 2003; Wheeler 2003; Antas 2004; Dreitz et al. 2004; Chatellenaz 2005; de
la Peña 2005; Angehr 2006; Jiménez & Zook 2007; Rodgers-Jr. 2007; Carvalho-Filho
et al. 2008; Jones & Komar 2008a; Reichert 2009; Chatellenaz et al. 2010; Palmer
2011; Bowling et al. 2012; Posso et al. 2012; Reichert et al. 2012; Román & Wiley
2012; Fortes & Denis 2013; Hernández-Vázquez et al. 2013; Bencke & Pereira 2014;
Machado et al. 2015; Cattau et al. 2016.
Helicolestes hamatus Greeney et al. 2004.
Harpagus bidentatus Schulze et al. 2000; Walther 2003; Greeney et al. 2004; Carvalho-Filho et al. 2008;
Greeney & Gelis 2008; Cintra & Naka 2012; Whitacre 2012.
Harpagus diodon Naka & Rodrigues 2000; Azevedo et al. 2003; Cabanne 2005; Azevedo et al. 2006;
Sigrist 2006; Cabanne & Roesler 2007; Carvalho-Filho et al. 2008; Canuto 2009;
Bodrati et al. 2010; Lees & Martin 2014.
Review of breeding biology of Neotropical Accipitriformes
Monsalvo et al.
169
Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia 26(2): 2018 Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia 26(2): 2018
Species Located references
Ictinia plumbea Seavy et al. 1997; Sick 1997; Seavy et al. 1998; Reichle et al. 2003; Antas 2004;
Cabanne 2005; Chatellenaz 2005; de la Peña 2005; Di Giacomo 2005; Angehr 2006;
Carvalho & Bohórquez 2007; Pérez-León 2007; Carvalho-Filho et al. 2008; Gussoni
& Guaraldo 2008; Salvador-Jr. & Silva 2009; Bodrati et al. 2010; Chatellenaz et al.
2010; Jacomassa 2011; Whitacre 2012; Kjeldsen 2013; Pinto-Ledezma & Justiniano
2013; Chatellenaz 2015; Maciel et al. 2016.
Circus cinereus Saggese & de Lucca 1995; Donázar et al. 1996; Maurício & Dias 1996; Sick 1997;
Arballo & Cravino 1999; Bó et al. 2000; Jaksic et al. 2002; Bó et al. 2004; de la Peña
2005; Baladrón et al. 2007; Camilotti et al. 2008; Capllonch et al. 2011; Alvarado et
al. 2015.
Circus buoni et al. 1996; Sick 1997; Arballo & Cravino 1999; Bó et al. 2004; Chatellenaz 2005;
Carvalho-Filho et al. 2008; Kirwan & Shirihai 2008; Chatellenaz et al. 2010; Alvarado
et al. 2015.
Accipiter poliogaster de Vries & Melo 2000; 2002; orstrom 2002a; Bodrati et al. 2010; Lima & Ribeiro
2011; Boesing et al. 2012.
Accipiter superciliosus Hennessey et al. 2003; iollay 2007; Carvalho-Filho et al. 2008; Bodrati et al. 2010.
Accipiter collaris Cuervo et al. 2008.
Accipiter gundlachi Rompré et al. 1999; Wallace et al. 1999; Peña et al. 2012; Ferrer-Sánchez & Rodríguez-
Estrella 2014; Ferrer-Sánchez 2015; Ferrer-Sánchez & Rodríguez-Estrella 2016.
Accipiter bicolor Pavez & González 1998; orstrom & Ki 1999; orstrom & Quixchán 2000; Reid et
al. 2002; Figueroa et al. 2004a; b; Mikich & Bérnils 2004; Ojeda et al. 2004; Carvalho-
Filho et al. 2005; Figueroa et al. 2007; Marini et al. 2007; Azpiroz & Menéndez 2008;
Carvalho-Filho et al. 2008; Canuto 2009; Bodrati et al. 2010; Zorzin 2011; Whitacre
2012; Hayes 2014; Alvarado et al. 2015; Medel-Hidalgo et al. 2015; Rivas-Fuenzalida
2015b; Rivas-Fuenzalida et al. 2015c.
Geranospiza caerulescens Sick 1997; Arballo & Cravino 1999; Sutter et al. 2001; del Ángel 2002; Reichle et
al. 2003; Chatellenaz 2005; Sigrist 2006; Carvalho-Filho et al. 2008; Canuto 2009;
Whitacre 2012.
Buteogallus anthracinus Barrantes 1998; Boal 2001; Barradas-García et al. 2004; Márquez et al. 2005; Barradas-
García & Morales-Mávil 2007; Clark 2007b; Pérez-León 2007; Flesch 2008; Sadoti
2008; Troy & Stahlecker 2008; Flesch 2009; Ruvalcaba-Ortega & González-Rojas
2009; Alava et al. 2011; Sadoti 2012; Uribe-Hernández et al. 2012; Etzel et al. 2014;
Smith & Finch 2014; Licence & McCarty 2015.
Buteogallus aequinoctialis Mikich & Bérnils 2004.
Buteogallus meridionalis Narozky & Martelli 1995; Best et al. 1996; Sick 1997; Andrade & Andrade 1998;
Arballo & Cravino 1999; Reichle et al. 2003; Antas 2004; Chatellenaz 2005; de la Peña
2005; Di Giacomo 2005; Navarro et al. 2007; Carvalho-Filho et al. 2008; Strewe et
al. 2009; Chatellenaz et al. 2010; Marini et al. 2012; Maurício et al. 2013; Camacho-
Varela et al. 2015; Silva & Machado 2015.
Buteogallus lacernulatus Carvalho-Filho et al. 2008; Canuto 2009.
Buteogallus urubitinga Best et al. 1996; Seavy & Gerhardt 1998; Arballo & Cravino 1999; Di Giacomo 2000;
Naveda-Rodríguez 2002; Reichle et al. 2003; Antas 2004; Naveda-Rodríguez 2004;
Chatellenaz 2005; de la Peña 2005; Di Giacomo 2005; Carvalho-Filho et al. 2006;
Carvalho-Filho et al. 2008; Canuto 2009; Chatellenaz et al. 2010; Whitacre 2012;
Kjeldsen 2013.
Buteogallus solitarius Mee et al. 2002; Strewe & Navarro 2003; Jones 2005; Clark 2007a; Seminario et al.
2011; Phillips 2012; Phillips & Martinez 2013; Phillips et al. 2014.
Review of breeding biology of Neotropical Accipitriformes
Monsalvo et al.
170
Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia 26(2): 2018 Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia 26(2): 2018
Species Located references
Buteogallus coronatus Sick 1997; Bellocq et al. 1998; Machado et al. 1998; Carvalho et al. 2002; Maceda et
al. 2003; Mikich & Bérnils 2004; de la Peña 2005; Di Giacomo 2005; Albuquerque
et al. 2006; Barcellos & Accordi 2006; Granzinolli et al. 2006; Torres et al. 2006;
Bragagnolo et al. 2007; Lobos et al. 2007; Maceda 2007; Maceda et al. 2007; Carvalho-
Filho et al. 2008; Tizianel 2008; Chiaravalloti et al. 2009; Sarasola et al. 2010; Banhos
& Sanaiotti 2011; Lobos et al. 2011; Berkunsky et al. 2012; Fandiño & Pautasso 2013;
Urios et al. 2014; Kilpp 2015; Montalvo et al. 2015; Barbar et al. 2016.
Morphnarchus princeps Sánchez & Sánchez-M. 2002; Muela & Valdez 2003; Márquez et al. 2005; Greeney &
Nunnery 2006; Gelis & Greeney 2007; Greeney et al. 2008.
Rupornis magnirostris Best et al. 1996; Capllonch 1997; Maragliano & Montalti 1997; Arballo & Cravino
1999; Naka & Rodrigues 2000; Panasci & Whitacre 2000; Carvalho et al. 2001a;
Höing & Camargo 2002; Naka et al. 2002; Panasci & Whitacre 2002; Reichle et al.
2003; Antas 2004; Bó et al. 2004; Chatellenaz 2005; de la Peña 2005; Di Giacomo
2005; Marini et al. 2007; Navarro et al. 2007; Carvalho-Filho et al. 2008; Gussoni &
Guaraldo 2008; Salvador-Jr. & Silva 2009; Santos & Rosado 2009; Santos et al. 2009;
Verea et al. 2009; Bodrati et al. 2010; Chatellenaz et al. 2010; Cavicchia & García
2012; Cintra & Naka 2012; Mojica 2012; Panasci 2012; Panasci unpub. data apud
GRIN 2012; Uribe-Hernández et al. 2012; Romano et al. 2015.
Parabuteo unicinctus Blue 1996; Silva & Olmos 1997; Arballo & Cravino 1999; Gerstell & Bednarz 1999;
Patten & Erickson 2000; Maceda & Kin 2001; Willis & Oniki 2003; de la Peña 2005;
Márquez et al. 2005; Dwyer 2006; Figueroa & González-Acuña 2006; Jenner et al.
2007; Pérez-León 2007; Dwyer & Mannan 2009; Ellis et al. 2009; Cavicchia & García
2012; Furman & Bastías 2012; Alvarado et al. 2015.
Parabuteo leucorrhous Freile & Chaves 2000; Mikich & Bérnils 2004; Greeney & Nunnery 2006; Tobias &
Seddon 2007; Zilio & Mendonça-Lima 2012.
Geranoaetus albicaudatus Sick 1997; Bellatti 2000; Granzinolli 2003; Reichle et al. 2003; Di Giacomo 2005;
Granzinolli & Motta-Junior 2006; Granzinolli et al. 2006; Actkinson et al. 2007;
Granzinolli & Motta-Junior 2007; Rappole et al. 2007; Carvalho-Filho et al. 2008;
Haralson 2008; Actkinson et al. 2009; Brown & Glinski 2009; Salvador-Jr. & Silva
2009; Motta-Junior et al. 2010; Greeney et al. 2011; Maurício et al. 2013.
Geranoaetus polyosoma Jiménez 1995; Donázar et al. 1996; Jaksic & Lazo 1999; Bó et al. 2004; de la Peña
2005; Alvarado & Figueroa 2006a; Cabot & de Vries 2009; Cabot et al. 2010a; b;
Greeney et al. 2011; Hahn et al. 2011; Lüthi 2011; Alvarado et al. 2015; Shirihai et al.
2015.
Geranoaetus melanoleucus de Lucca & Saggese 1995; Hiraldo et al. 1995; Narozky & Martelli 1995; Best et
al. 1996; Donázar et al. 1996; Sick 1997; Arballo & Cravino 1999; Jaksic & Lazo
1999; Sousa 1999; Bellatti 2000; Pavez 2001; Saggese & de Lucca 2001; Bencke et al.
2003; de la Peña 2005; Trejo et al. 2006b; Zorzin et al. 2007; Salvador-Jr. et al. 2008;
Chatellenaz et al. 2010; Arriagada et al. 2011; Lüthi 2011; de Lucca & Saggese 2012;
Alvarado et al. 2015; Ignazi 2015; Pérez 2015; Raimilla et al. 2015; Lemos 2016.
Pseudastur polionotus Willis & Oniki 2002; Bencke et al. 2003; Corrêa et al. 2008; Canuto 2009.
Pseudastur albicollis Draheim 1995; Cisneros-Heredia 2006; Cintra & Naka 2012; Whitacre 2012.
Pseudastur occidentalis Vargas 1995; Best et al. 1996.
Leucopternis semiplumbeus Ferguson-Lees & Christie 2001.
Leucopternis melanops Ferguson-Lees & Christie 2001; Cintra & Naka 2012.
Leucopternis kuhli Kirwan 2009.
Buteo plagiatus Bibles & Mannan 2004; Werner 2004; Patrikeev 2007; Rappole et al. 2007; Flesch
2008; Flesch & Saavedra 2008; Flesch 2009; Ruvalcaba-Ortega & González-Rojas
2009; Sandoval 2009; Vargas-Masís & Ramírez 2012.
Review of breeding biology of Neotropical Accipitriformes
Monsalvo et al.
171
Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia 26(2): 2018 Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia 26(2): 2018
Species Located references
Buteo nitidus Sick 1997; Reichle et al. 2003; Navarro et al. 2007; Sandoval 2009; Strewe et al. 2009;
Cintra & Naka 2012.
Buteo ridgwayi orstrom 2002b; orstrom et al. 2005; 2007; Woolaver 2011; Woolaver et al. 2013a,
b, c, Woolaver et al. 2015.
Buteo albigula Gelain et al. 2001; Trejo et al. 2001; Ojeda et al. 2003; Pavez et al. 2004; Trejo et al.
2004; Trejo et al. 2006a; Silva-Rodríguez et al. 2008; Henry & Aznar 2009; Rivas-
Fuenzalida et al. 2013; Alvarado et al. 2015; Rivas-Fuenzalida et al. 2015b.
Buteo brachyurus Naka & Rodrigues 2000; Carvalho et al. 2001a; Jones 2002; Wheeler 2003; Meyer
2004, 2005; Meyer & Zimmerman 2007; Rappole et al. 2007; Williams-III et al. 2007;
Brush 2008; Carvalho-Filho et al. 2008; Flesch 2008; Rizkalla et al. 2009; Salvador-
Jr. & Silva 2009; Howell 2010; Snyder et al. 2010; Monsalvo 2012; Enge et al. 2014;
Straube et al. 2014; Oliveira et al. 2015; FWC [s.d.].
Buteo galapagoensis Faaborg et al. 1995; DeLay et al. 1996; Bollmer et al. 2003; Whiteman & Parker 2004a;
b; Bollmer et al. 2005; Jaramillo & Vargas 2010; Rivera et al. 2011; Muñoz 2012.
Buteo albonotatus Kennedy et al. 1995; Sick 1997; Pérez-León 2007; Carvalho-Filho et al. 2008; Flesch
2008; Howell 2010; Olmos & Albano 2012.
Buteo ventralis Figueroa et al. 2000; Imberti 2003; Rivas-Fuenzalida et al. 2009, 2011; Norambuena
et al. 2012; Medel-Hidalgo et al. 2013; Norambuena et al. 2013; Raimilla et al. 2013;
Rivas-Fuenzalida & Asciones-Contreras 2013; Figueroa unpub. data apud GRIN
2015; Rivas-Fuenzalida 2015a; Rivas-Fuenzalida & Asciones-Contreras 2015; Rivas-
Fuenzalida et al. 2015a, 2016.
APPENDIX II
Complete list of references retrieved in this review and cited in Appendix I.
Actkinson M.A., Kuvlesky-Jr. W.P., Boal C.W., Brennan L.A. &
Hernandez F. 2007. Nesting habitat relationships of sympatric
Crested Caracaras, Red-tailed Hawks, and White-Tailed Hawks
in south Texas. Wilson Journal of Ornithology 119: 570–578.
Actkinson M.A., Kuvlesky-Jr. W.P., Boal C.W., Brennan L.A. &
Hernandez F. 2009. Comparison of the breeding biology of
sympatric Red-Tailed Hawks, White-Tailed Hawks, and Crested
Caracaras in south Texas. Journal of Raptor Research 43: 50–56.
Aguiar-Silva F.H., Junqueira T.G., Sanaiotti T.M., Guimarães V.Y.,
Mathias P.V.C. & Mendonça C.V. 2015. Resource availability
and diet in Harpy Eagle breeding territories on the Xingu River,
Brazilian Amazon. Brazilian Journal of Biology 75: 181–189.
Aguiar-Silva F.H., Sanaiotti T.M., Jaudoin O., Srbek-Araujo A.C.,
Siqueira G. & Banhos A. 2012. Harpy Eagle sightings, traces and
nesting records at the “Reserva Natural Vale”, a Brazilian Atlantic
Forest remnant in Espírito Santo, Brazil. Revista Brasileira de
Ornitologia 20: 148–155.
Aguiar-Silva F.H., Sanaiotti T.M. & Luz B.B. 2014. Food habits of
the Harpy Eagle, a top predator from the Amazonian Rainforest
canopy. Journal of Raptor Research 48: 24–35.
Alava J.J., Saavedra M., Arosemena X., Calle M., Vinueza C., Jiménez
P.J., Carvajal R. & Vargas F.H. 2011. Distributional records
and potential threats to the Common (Mangrove) Black Hawk
(Buteogallus anthracinus subtilis) in southwestern Ecuador. Boletín
SAO 20: 18‒28.
Albuquerque J.L.B., Ghizoni-Jr. I.R., Silva E.S., Trannini G., Franz
I., Barcellos A., Hassdenteufel C.B., Arend F.L. & Martins-
Ferreira C. 2006. Águia-cinzenta (Harpyhaliaetus coronatus) e o
Gavião-real-falso (Morphnus guianensis) em Santa Catarina e Rio
Grande do Sul: prioridades e desaos para sua conservação. Revista
Brasileira de Ornitologia 14: 411–415.
Alvarado S.A. & Figueroa R.A. 2006a. Unusual observation of three
Red-backed Hawks (Buteo polyosoma) defending a nest. Journal of
Raptor Research 40: 248–249.
Alvarado S.A.A., Figueroa R.A., Faúndez P.V., Carrasco-Lagos P. &
Moreno R.A. 2015. Aves rapaces de la Región Metropolitana de
Santiago, Chile. Santiago: Universidad de Chile.
Alvarez E., Ellis D.H., Smith D.G. & Larue C.T. 1996. Diurnal raptors
in the fragmented rain forest of the Sierra Imataca, Venezuela, p.
263–274. In: Bird D., Varland D. & Negro J. (eds.). Raptors in
human landscapes: adaptations to built and cultivated environments.
London: Academic Press.
Alvarez-Cordero E. 1996. Biology and conservation of the Harpy Eagle
in Venezuela and Panama. Ph.D. esis. Gainesville: University
of Florida.
Alvarez-López H. & Kattan G.H. 1995. Notes on the conservation
status of resident diurnal raptors of the middle Cauca Valley,
Colombia. Bird Conservation International 5: 341–348.
Anderson D.L., Wiedenfeld D.A., Bechard M.J. & Novak S.J. 2004.
Avian diversity in the Moskitia Region of Honduras. Ornitología
Neotropical 15: 447–482.
Andrade M.A. & Andrade M.V.G. 1998. Novas observações sobre
Review of breeding biology of Neotropical Accipitriformes
Monsalvo et al.
172
Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia 26(2): 2018 Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia 26(2): 2018
a nidicação de algumas aves em Minas Gerais. Atualidades
Ornitológicas 82: 7.
Andrade M.A., Gontijo R.G.R. & Mendes L.G.M. 1996. O Gavião-
pato (Spizastur melanoleucus) em Minas Gerais: uma ave rara e
ameaçada de extinção. Atualidades Ornitológicas 72: 12–13.
Anfuso J., Suarez M.V.G. & Chebez J.C. 2008. Nuevo registro de
nidicación de la Harpía (Harpia harpyja) en la provincia de
Misiones, Argentina y consideraciones sobre su conservación.
Nótulas Faunísticas 21: 1–3.
Angehr G.R. 1999. Rapid long-distance colonization of Lake Gatun,
Panama, by Snail Kites. Wilson Bulletin 111: 265–268.
Angehr G.R. 2006. Annotated checklist of the birds of Panama. Panamá:
Panama Audubon Society.
Antas P.T.Z. 2004. Pantanal: guia de aves: espécies da Reserva Particular
do Patrimônio Natural do SESC Pantanal. Rio de Janeiro: SESC
Nacional.
Araóz R. & Aveldaño S. 2013. Registro de ejemplares de Águila Poma
(Oroaetus isidori) para el departamento La Candelaria, provincia
de Salta, Argentina. Nótulas Faunísticas 118: 1–4.
Arballo E. & Cravino J.L. 1999. Aves del Uruguay: manual ornitológico,
v. 1. Montevideo: Editorial Hemisferio Sur.
Arriagada A.M., Arriagada J.L., Baessolo L.A. & Suazo C.G. 2011.
Dieta estival del Águila (Geranoaetus melanoleucus) en la región de
Aysén, Patagonia Chilena. Ecotrópicos 24: 164–171.
Azevedo M.A.G. & Di Bernardo M. 2005. História natural e
conservação do Gavião-tesoura, Elanoides forcatus, na Ilha de
Santa Catarina, sul do Brasil. 13: 81–88.
Azevedo M.A.G., Machado D.A. & Albuquerque J.L.B. 2003. Aves
de rapina na Ilha de Santa Catarina, SC: composicão, frequência
de ocorrência, uso de habitat e conservação. Ararajuba 11: 75–81.
Azevedo M.A.G., Piacentini V.D.Q., Ghizoni-Jr. I.R., Albuquerque
J.L.B., Silva E.S., Joenck C.M., Mendonça-Lima A. & Zilio
F. 2006. Biologia do Gavião-bombachinha, Harpagus diodon,
no estado de Santa Catarina, sul do Brasil. Revista Brasileira de
Ornitologia 14: 351–357.
Azpiroz A.B. & Menéndez J.L. 2008. ree new species and novel
distributional data for birds in Uruguay. Bulletin of the British
Ornithologists' Club 128: 38–56.
Baladrón A., Bó M.S. & Malizia A. 2007. Time-activity patterns of
breeding Cinereous Harriers (Circus cinereus) in southeastern
Buenos Aires province, Argentina, p. 262 In: Bildstein K.L.,
Barber D.R. & Zimmerman A. (eds.). Neotropical raptors.
Kempton: Hawk Mountain Sanctuary.
Banhos A. & Sanaiotti T.M. 2011. Registro histórico de nidicação
de Urubitinga coronata em Santa Teresa, Espírito Santo, Brasil.
Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia 19: 85–87.
Barbar F., Capdevielle A. & Encabo M. 2016. Direct persecution of
Crowned Eagles (Buteogallus coronatus) in Argentina: a new call
for their conservation. Journal of Raptor Research 50: 115–120.
Barcellos A. & Accordi I.A. 2006. New records of the Crowned
Eagle, Harpyhaliaetus coronatus, in the state of Rio Grande do Sul,
southern Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia 14: 345–349.
Barradas-García H.H., Díaz G.C. & Luna E.R. 2004. Anidación
del Aguililla Negra (Buteogallus anthracinus Deppe 1830) en el
manglar de Sontecomapan, Catemaco, Veracruz, México. Madera
y Bosques 2: 37–43.
Barradas-García H.H. & & Morales-Mávil J.E. 2007. Parental care
of nesting Common Black Hawks (Buteogallus anthracinus) in
the Sontecomapan Mangroves, Veracruz, Mexico, p. 1–8. In:
Bildstein K.L., Barber D.R. & Zimmerman A. (eds.). Neotropical
raptors. Kempton: Hawk Mountain Sanctuary.
Barrantes G. 1998. Reproductive activity of birds in a mangrove
swamp in northwest Costa Rica. Revista de Biología Tropical 46:
1163–1166.
Beissinger S.R. & Snyder N.F.R. 2002. Water levels aect nest success
of the Snail Kite in Florida: AIC and the omission of relevant
candidate models. Condor 104: 208–215.
Bellatti J. 2000. Comportamiento y abundancia relativa de rapaces
de la Patagonia extraandina argentina. Ornitología Neotropical 11:
207–222.
Bellocq M.I., Bonaventura S.M., Marcelino F.N. & Sabatini M. 1998.
Habitat use of Crowned Eagles (Harpyhaliaetus coronatus) in the
southern limits of the species' range. Journal of Raptor Research
32: 312–314.
Bencke G.A., Fontana C.S., Dias R.A., Maurício G.N. & Mahler-Jr.
J.K.F. 2003. Aves, p. 189–480. In: Fontana C.S., Bencke G.A. &
Reis R.E. (eds.). Livro vermelho da fauna ameaçada de extinção do
Rio Grande do Sul. Porto Alegre: EDIPUCRS.
Bencke G.A. & Pereira M.S. 2014. Aves, p. 198–235. In: Gastal
H.A.O. & Bencke G.A. (eds.). Habitantes da Estação Ambiental
Braskem: 25 anos de pesquisa. Porto Alegre:Braskem/Fundação
Zoobotânica do Rio Grande do Sul.
Bennetts R.E., Golden K., Dreitz V.J. & Kitchens W.M. 1998. e
proportion of Snail Kites attempting to breed and the number
of breeding attempts per year in Florida. Florida Field Naturalist
26: 77–108.
Bennetts R.E. & Kitchens W.M. 1999. Within-year survival patterns
of Snail Kites in Florida. Journal of Field Ornithology 70: 268–275.
Bennetts R.E. & Kitchens W.M. 2000. Factors inuencing movement
probabilities of a nomadic food specialist: proximate foraging
benets or ultimate gains from exploration? Oikos 91: 459–467.
Bennetts R.E., Kitchens W.M. & Dreitz V.J. 2002. Inuence of
an extreme high water event on survival, reproduction, and
distribution of Snail Kites in Florida, USA. Wetlands 22: 366–373.
Berkunsky I., Daniele G., Kacoliris F.P., Faegre S.I.K., Gandoy F.A.,
González L. & Luque J.A.D. 2012. Records of the Crowned Eagle
(Urubitinga coronata) in Moxos plains of Bolivia and observations
about breeding behavior. Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia 20:
447–450.
Bertassoni A., Xavier-Filho N.L., Moreira V.F., Feitosa R., Porfírio
G. & Brandão A.W.A. 2012. A nest of Black-collared Hawk
Busarellus nigricollis at Serra do Amolar, Pantanal, Brazil. Cotinga
34: 108–109.
Best B.J., Checker M., ewlis R.M., Best A.L. & Duckworth W.
1996. New bird breeding data from southwestern Ecuador.
Ornitología Neotropical 7: 69–73.
Bibles B.D. & Mannan R.W. 2004. Productivity and nest-site
characteristics of Gray Hawks in southern Arizona. Journal of
Raptor Research 38: 238–242.
Blihovde W.B. 2002. Agonistic behavior in the Swallow-tailed Kite.
Florida Field Naturalist 30: 41.
Blue R. 1996. Documentation of raptor nests on electric utility
facilities through a mail survey, p. 87–96. In: Bird D., Varland D.
& Negro J. (eds.). Raptors in human landscapes: adaptations to built
and cultivated environments. London: Academic Press.
Bó M.S., Baladrón A., Biondi L., Sánchez K., Malizia A., Canepuccia
A., Vargas R., Cicchino & Darrieu C. 2004. Relaciones trócas y
nidicación em un ensamble de rapaces de la región pampeana:
resultados de 10 años de estudio. La Plata: Actas del Primer
Simposio Argentino Sobre Investigación y Conservación de Rapaces.
Bó M.S., Cicchino S.M. & Martínez M.M. 1996. Diet of Long-
Winged Harrier (Circus buoni) in southeastern Buenos Aires
province, Argentina. Journal of Raptor Research 30: 237–239.
Bó M.S., Cicchino S.M. & Martínez M.M. 2000. Diet of breeding
Cinereous Harriers (Circus cinereus) in southeastern Buenos Aires
province, Argentina. Journal of Raptor Research 34: 237–241.
Boal C.W. 2001. Strategies for monitoring Common Black-Hawk
(Buteogallus anthracinus) populations in North America. USGS.
https://srfs.wr.usgs.gov/pdf/buanstrategy.pdf (Access on 24
October 2016).
Bodrati A., Cockle K., Segovia J.M., Roesler I., Areta J.I. & Jordan
E. 2010. La avifauna del Parque Provincial Cruce Caballero,
Review of breeding biology of Neotropical Accipitriformes
Monsalvo et al.
173
Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia 26(2): 2018 Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia 26(2): 2018
provincia de Misiones, Argentina. Cotinga 32: 41–64.
Boesing A.L., Menq W. & Anjos L. 2012. First description of the
reproductive biology of the Grey-Bellied Hawk (Accipiter
poliogaster). Wilson Journal of Ornithology 124: 767–774.
Bollmer J.L., Sanchez T., Cannon M.D., Sanchez D., Cannon B.,
Bednarz J.C., de Vries T., Struve M.S. & Parker P.G. 2003.
Variation in morphology and mating system among island
populations of Galápagos Hawks. Condor 105: 428–438.
Bollmer J.L., Whiteman N.K., Cannon M.D., Bednarz J.C., de Vries
T. & Parker P.G. 2005. Population genetics of the Galápagos
Hawk (Buteo galapagoensis): genetic monomorphism within
isolated populations. Auk 122: 1210–1224.
Bornschein M.R. & Reinert B.L. 2000. Aves de três remanescentes
orestais do norte do estado do Paraná, sul do Brasil, com
sugestões para a conservação e manejo. Revista Brasileira de
Zoologia 17: 615–636.
Bowling A.C., Martin J. & Kitchens W.M. 2012. e eect of
changes in habitat conditions on the movement of juvenile Snail
Kites Rostrhamus sociabilis. Ibis 154: 554–565.
Bragagnolo L., Maceda J., Reyes M., Salvador V., Santillán M. &
Sarasola J. 2007. Characterization of the nesting habitat of the
Crowned Solitary Eagle (Harpyhaliaetus solitarius) in the province
of La Pampa, Argentina. In: Bildstein K.L., Barber D.R. &
Zimmerman A. (eds.). Neotropical raptors. Kempton: Hawk
Mountain Sanctuary.
Brown D.E. & Glinski R.L. 2009. e status of the White-tailed
Hawk in Arizona and Sonora, Mexico. Journal of the Arizona-
Nevada Academy of Science 41: 8–15.
Brown R.E., Williamson J.H. & Boone D.B. 1997. Swallow-tailed
Kite nesting in Texas: past and present. Southwestern Naturalist
42: 103–105.
Brush T. 2008. Additions to the breeding avifauna of the Lower Rio
Grande Valley of Texas. Studies in Avian Biology 37: 11–19.
Cabanne G.S. 2005. Observaciones sobre los vuelos de exhibición de
tres milanos de la selva atlántica: el Milano Cabeza Gris (Leptodon
cayanensis), el Milano Plomizo (Ictinia plumbea) y el Milano de
Corbata (Harpagus diodon). Ornitología Neotropical 16: 197–204.
Cabanne G.S. & Roesler I. 2007. A description of a nest and nestlings
of the Rufous-thighed Kite (Harpagus diodon), with additional
comments on diet and behavior. Ornitología Neotropical 18: 469–
476.
Cabot J. & de Vries T. 2009. A new subspecies of Gurney's Hawk
Buteo oecilochrous. Bulletin of the British Ornithologists' Club 129:
149–164.
Cabot J., de Vries T. & Stiles F.G. 2010a. On the distribution and
habitat of the Gurney's Buzzard, p. 147–152. In: Hernandez V.J.,
Muñiz R., Cabot J. & Vries T. (eds.). Aves rapaces y conservación:
una perspectiva iberoamericana. http://investigaciones.puce.edu.
ec/handle/23000/302 (Access on 24 October 2016).
Cabot J., de Vries T. & Alvarado S. 2010b. Distribución espacial
de rapaces en el desierto de Atacama, Chile, con notas sobre
el busardo de Gurney Buteo poecilochrous, p. 153–162. Aves
rapaces y conservación: una perspectiva iberoamericana. http://
digital.csic.es/bitstream/10261/50105/1/2010.ATACAMA%20
DISTRIBUCION.pdf (Access on 24 October 2016).
Camacho-Varela P. & Acosta-Chaves V. 2015. Nidicação e
comportamento social do Gavião-peneira (Elanus leucurus) em
áreas urbanas da Costa Rica. Spizaetus 19: 36–43.
Camacho-Varela P., Hernández-Ugarte D., Salazar-Araya M. &
Jiménez-Córdoba C. 2015. Primer registro de la anidación de
Buteogallus meridionalis em Costa Rica y notas sobre su dieta
reproductiva. Spizaetus 19: 44–51.
Camilotti V.L., Krügel M.M. & Hatz S.M. 2008. Nidicação de
Circus cinereus (Aves, Accipitridae) na região da fronteira oeste do
Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia 16:
363–365.
Canuto M. 2008. First description of the nest of the Black-and-white
Hawk Eagle (Spizaetus melanoleucus) in the Brazilian Atlantic
Rainforest, southeast Brazil. Ornitología Neotropical 19: 607–610.
Canuto M. 2009. Ecologia de comunidades de aves de rapina
(Cathartidae, Accipitridae e Falconidae) em fragmento de Mata
Atlântica na região do Médio Rio Doce, MG. MSc. Dissertation.
Ouro Preto: Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto.
Canuto M., Zorzin G., Carvalho-Filho E.P.M., Carvalho C.E.A.,
Carvalho G.D.M. & Benca C.E.R.T. 2012. Conservation,
management and expansion of protected and non-protected
tropical forest remnants through population density estimation,
ecology and natural history of top predators; case studies of birds
of prey (Spizaetus taxon), p. 359–388. In: Sudarshana P. (ed.).
Tropical forests. Rijeka: InTech.
Capllonch P. 1997. La avifauna de los bosques de transicion del noroeste
de Argentina. Ph.D. esis. Mendoza: Universidad Nacional de
Tucuman.
Capllonch P., Ortiz D. & Ferro I. 2011. Notas sobre la avifauna de
las Cumbres Calchaquíes, Tucumán, Argentina. Acta Zoológica
Lilloana 55: 50–63.
Carpenter J.P. & Allen D.H. 2013. General eld notes rst nest record
of Swallow-tailed Kite (Elanoides forcatus) in North Carolina.
Chat 77: 74–78.
Carvalho C.E.A. & Bohórquez G.A. 2007. Breeding biology of
Plumbeous Kite (Ictinia plumbea) in southeast Brazil. In: Bildstein
K.L., Barber D.R. & Zimmerman A. (eds.). Neotropical raptors.
Kempton: Hawk Mountain Sanctuary.
Carvalho C.E.A., Carvalho-Filho E.P.M. & Chaves-Filho A. 2002.
Observaciones del comportamiento de anidación del Águila
Coronada (Harpyhaliaetus coronatus - Falconiformes: Accipitridae)
en el sureste de Brasil. Panamá: Conferencia Sobre Aves Rapaces
Neotropicales y Simposio del Águila Arpía.
Carvalho C.E.A., Lisboa J.S., Carvalho-Filho E.P.M. & Carvalho
G.D.M. 2001a. Relatos de ataques de acipitrídeos a humanos em
algumas áreas urbanas do sudeste do Brasil. In: Straube F.C. (ed.).
Ornitologia Sem Fronteiras. Curitiba: Resumos do IX Congresso
Brasileiro de Ornitologia.
Carvalho G.D.M., Carvalho-Filho E.P.M. & Carvalho C.E.A.
2001b. Dados preliminares sobre a reprodução de Elanus leucurus
(Accipitridae) no município de Sete Lagoas e Divinópolis - MG.
Revista de Biologia e Ciências da Terra 1: 1–6.
Carvalho-Filho E.P.M., Canuto M. & Zorzin G. 2006. Biologia
reprodutiva e dieta do Gavião-preto (Buteogallus u. urubitinga:
Accipitridae) no sudeste do Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia
14: 445–448.
Carvalho-Filho E.P.M., Carvalho G.D.M. & Carvalho C.E.A. 2002.
Biologia reproductiva del Gavilan Cabecigris al Sureste de Brasil.
Panamá: Conferencia Sobre Aves Rapaces Neotropicales y Simposio
del Águila Arpía.
Carvalho-Filho E.P.M., Carvalho G.D.M. & Carvalho C.E.A. 2005.
Observations of nesting Gray-Headed Kites (Leptodon cayanensis)
in southeastern Brazil. Journal of Raptor Research 39: 89‒92.
Carvalho-Filho E.P.M., Zorzin G., Canuto M., Carvalho C.E.A.
& Carvalho G.D.M. 2008. Aves de rapina diurnas do Parque
Estadual do Rio Doce, Minas Gerais, Brasil. MG Biota 1: 4–43.
Castañeda S.Z. 2012. Estado del conocimiento actual del Águila Real
de Montaña Spizaetus isidori en Colombia. Spizaetus 13: 9–14.
Cattau C.E., Fletcher-Jr. R.J., Reichert B.E. & Kitchens W.M. 2016.
Counteracting eects of a non-native prey on the demography
of a native predator culminate in positive population growth.
Ecological Applications 26: 1952–1968.
Chatellenaz M.L. 2005. Aves del Valle del Río Paraná en la provincia
del Chaco, Argentina: riqueza, historia natural y conservación.
Miscelánia 14: 527–550.
Chatellenaz M.L. 2015. Cooperative hunting by a pair of Plumbeous
Kites (Ictinia plumbea). Ornitología Neotropical 26: 109–112.
Review of breeding biology of Neotropical Accipitriformes
Monsalvo et al.
174
Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia 26(2): 2018 Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia 26(2): 2018
Chatellenaz M.L., Cano P.D., Saibene C. & Ball H.C. 2010.
Inventario de las aves del Parque Nacional Mburucuyá (provincia
de Corrientes, Argentina). Acta Zoológica Lilloana 54: 139–160.
Chebez J.C. 1995. Acerca de la distribucion de la Harpia en Argentina.
Nuestras Aves 31: 21–23.
Chiaravalloti R.M., Tomas W.M., Tizianel F.A.T. & Camilo A.R.
2009. Aves, Accipitridae, Harpyhaliaetus coronatus: a documented
record in the Pantanal wetland. Check List 5: 89–91.
Chiavacci S.J., Bader T.J., St. Pierre A.M., Bednarz J.C. & Rowe K.L.
2011. Reproductive status of Swallow-Tailed Kites in east-central
Arkansas. Wilson Journal of Ornithology 123: 97–101.
Cintra R. & Naka L.N. 2012. Spatial variation in bird community
composition in relation to topographic gradient and forest
heterogeneity in a central Amazonian Rainforest. International
Journal of Ecology 2012: 435671.
Cisneros-Heredia D.F. 2006. Notes on breeding, behaviour and
distribution of some birds in Ecuador. Bulletin of the British
Ornithologists' Club 126: 153–164.
Clark W.S. 2002. First nesting of dark-morph Hook-billed Kite in the
United States. North American Birds 56: 260–262.
Clark W.S. 2003. Observations on nesting Hook-billed Kites in the
Rio Grande Valley. Bulletin of Texas Ornithological Society 36: 40.
Clark W.S. 2004. First dark-morph Hook-billed Kite edged in the
United States. North American Birds 58: 170.
Clark W.S. 2007a. Solitary Eagles: possible in Texas? Texas Bird Annual
3: 16–18.
Clark W.S. 2007b. Taxonomic status and distribution of Mangrove
Black Hawk Buteogallus (anthracinus) subtilis. Bulletin of the
British Ornithologists' Club 127: 110–117.
Corrêa L., Bazílio S., Woldan D. & Boesing A.L. 2008. Avifauna
da Floresta Nacional de Três Barras (Santa Catarina, Brasil).
Atualidades Ornitológicas 143: 38–41.
Coulson J.O. 2001. Swallow-Tailed Kites carry passerine nests
containing nestlings to their own nests. Wilson Bulletin 113:
340–342.
Coulson J.O. 2002. Mississippi Kites use Swallow-Tailed Kite nests.
Journal of Raptor Research 36: 155–156.
Coulson J.O., Coulson T.D., DeFrancesch S.A. & Sherry T.W. 2008.
Predators of the Swallow-Tailed Kite in southern Louisiana and
Mississippi. Journal of Raptor Research 42: 1–12.
Crease A. 2009. Avian range extensions from the southern headwaters
of the Río Caroní, Gran Sabana, Bolívar, Venezuela. Cotinga 31:
5–19.
Crease A. & Tepedino I. 2013. Observations at a nest of Crested Eagle
Morphnus guianensis in the southern Gran Sabana, Venezuela.
Cotinga 35: 90–93.
Cuervo A.M., Pulgarín P.C. & Calderón D. 2008. New distributional
bird data from the Cordillera Central of the Colombian Andes,
with implications for the biogeography of northwestern South
America. Condor 110: 526–537.
de la Peña M.R. 2005. Reproducción de las aves argentinas (con
descripción de pichones). Buenos Aires: Editorial L.O.L.A.
de Lucca E.R. 1996. Observaciones de un nido exitoso de Harpía
(Harpia harpyja) en Argentina. Hornero 14: 70–72.
de Lucca E.R. & Saggese M.D. 1995. Fratricidio en el Águila Mora
Geranoaetus melanoleucus. Hornero 14: 38–39.
de Lucca E.R. & Saggese M.D. 2012. Parental care and time-activity
budget of a breeding pair of Black-chested Buzzard-eagles
(Geranoaetus melanoleucus) in southern Patagonia, Argentina.
Ornitología Colombiana 12: 17–24.
de Vries T. & Melo C. 2000. First nesting record of the nest of a Slaty-
backed Forest-falcon (Micrastur mirandollei) in Yasuní National
Park, Ecuadorian Amazon. Journal of Raptor Research 34: 148–
150.
de Vries T. & Melo C. 2002. Micrastur or Accipiter, that is the question.
Journal of Raptor Research 36: 337.
del Ángel J.C.G. 2002. Notas sobre la tolerancia de algunas rapaces
Neotropicales boscosas a los ambientes transformados en el estado
de Veracruz, Mexico. Panamá: Conferencia Sobre Aves Rapaces
Neotropicales y Simposio del Águila Arpía.
DeLay L.S., Faaborg J., Naranjo J., Paz S.M., de Vries T. & Parker P.G.
1996. Paternal care in the cooperatively polyandrous Galapagos
Hawk. Condor 98: 300–311.
Dénes F.V. 2009. Taxonomia e distribuição dos gaviões do gênero
Leptodon Sundevall, 1836 (Aves: Accipitridae). MSc. Dissertation.
São Paulo: Universidade de São Paulo.
Dénes F.V., Silveira L.F., Seipke S., orstrom R., Clark W.S. &
iollay J.M. 2011. e White-collared Kite (Leptodon forbesi
Swann, 1922) and a review of the taxonomy of the Grey-headed
Kite (Leptodon cayanensis Latham, 1790). Wilson Journal of
Ornithology 123: 323–331.
Di Giacomo A.G. 2000. Nidicación de algunas rapaces poco
conocidas en el Chaco oriental argentino. Hornero 15: 135–139.
Di Giacomo A.G. 2005. Aves de la Reserva El Bagual, p. 201–465.
In: Di Giacomo A.G. & Krapovickas S.F. (eds.). Historia natural
y paisaje de la Reserva El Bagual, provincia de Formosa, Argentina:
inventario de la fauna de vertebrados y de la flora vascular de un área
protegida del chaco húmedo. Buenos Aires: Asociación Ornitológica
del Plata.
Donázar J.A., Travaini A., Rodríguez A., Ceballos O. & Hiraldo F.
1996. Nesting association of raptors and Bu-Necked Ibis in the
Argentinean Patagonia. Colonial Waterbirds 19: 111–115.
Draheim G.S. 1995. Breeding biology and habitat requirements of
the White Hawk (Leucopternis albicollis) in Guatemala. MSc.
Dissertation. Boise: Boise State University.
Dreitz V.J. 2000. e inuence of environmental variation on the Snail
Kite population in Florida. Ph.D. esis. Coral Gables: University
of Miami.
Dreitz V.J., Bennetts R.E., Toland B., Kitchens W.M. & Collopy
M.W. 2001. Spatial and temporal variability in nest success of
Snail Kites in Florida: a meta-analysis. Condor 103: 502–509.
Dreitz V.J., Bennetts R.E., Toland B., Kitchens W.M. & Collopy
M.W. 2002a. Snail Kite nest success and water levels: a reply to
Beissinger and Snyder. Condor 104: 216–221.
Dreitz V.J., DeAngelis D.L. & Kitchens W.M. 1999. Nesting success,
numbers, and dispersal of Snail Kites in the Blue Cypress Water
Management and Conservation Areas. Final report. Coral Gables:
University of Miami.
Dreitz V.J. & Duberstein J.A. 2001. Use of red mangrove for nesting
by Snail Kites in orida. Florida Field Naturalist 29: 49–50.
Dreitz V.J., Kitchens W.M. & DeAngelis D.L. 2004. Eects of natal
departure and water level on survival of juvenile Snail Kites
(Rostrhamus sociabilis) in Florida. Auk 121: 894–903.
Dreitz V.J., Nichols J.D., Hines J.E., Bennetts R.E., Kitchens W.M. &
DeAngelis D.L. 2002b. e use of resighting data to estimate the
rate of population growth of the Snail Kite in Florida. Journal of
Applied Statistics 29: 609–623.
Dwyer J.F. 2006. Electric shock injuries in a Harris's Hawk population.
Journal of Raptor Research 40: 193–199.
Dwyer J.F. & Mannan W. 2009. Return rates of aluminium versus
plastic leg bands from electrocuted Harris' Hawks (Parabuteo
unicinctus). Journal of Raptor Research 43: 152–154.
Eisermann K. & Avendaño C. 2007. Annotated checklist of the birds of
Guatemala. Bellaterra: Lynx Editions.
Ellis D.H., Craig T., Craig E., Postupalsky S., La Rue C.T., Nelson
R.W., Anderson D.W., Henny C.J., Watson J., Millsap B.A.,
Dawson J.W., Cole K.L., Martin E.M., Margalida A. & Kung P.
2009. Unusual raptor nests around the world. Journal of Raptor
Research 43: 175–198.
Enge K.M., Douglass N.J., Gore, J.A., Hovis J.A., Meyer K.D., Wallace
G.E. & Farmer A.L. 2014. Survey of rare vertebrates in the Fisheating
Creek area, Glades County, Florida. Florida Scientist 77: 15–42.
Review of breeding biology of Neotropical Accipitriformes
Monsalvo et al.
175
Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia 26(2): 2018 Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia 26(2): 2018
Erichsen A.L., Smallwood S.K., Commandatore A.M., Wilson B.W. &
Fry M.D. 1996. White-tailed Kite movement and nesting patterns
in an agricultural landscape, p. 165–176. In: Bird D., Varland D.
& Negro J. (eds.). Raptors in human landscapes: adaptations to built
and cultivated environments. London: Academic Press.
Ericson P.G.P. & Amarilla L.A. 1997. First observations and new
distributional data for birds in Paraguay. Bulletin of the British
Ornithologists' Club 117: 60–67.
Etzel K.E., eimer T.C., Johnson M.J. & Holmes J.A. 2014.
Variation in prey delivered to Common Black-Hawk (Buteogallus
anthracinus) nests in Arizona drainage Basins. Journal of Raptor
Research 48: 54–60.
Evangelista M.M., Andrade M.L.F., Almeida S.M. & Buso-Junior
A.Á. 2012. Predação de Caiman yacare (Spix, 1825) (Crocodilia,
Alligatoridae) por Busarellus nigricollis (Latham, 1790)
(Accipitriformes, Accipitridae) na Estação Ecológica de Taiamã,
Alto Pantanal, Mato Grosso. Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia 20:
73–74.
Faaborg J., Parker P.G., DeLay L., de Vries T., Bednarz J.C., Paz S.M.,
Naranjo J. & Waite T.A. 1995. Conrmation of cooperative
polyandry in the Galapagos Hawk (Buteo galapagoensis). Behavioral
Ecology and Sociobiology 36: 83–90.
Fandiño B. & Pautasso A.A. 2013. Distribución, historia natural y
conservación de Harpyhaliaetus coronatus (Aves: Accipitridae) en el
centro-este de Argentina. Natura Neotropicalis 44: 41–59.
Ferguson-Lees J. & Christie D.A. 2001. Raptors of the world. London:
Christopher Helm.
Ferrer-Sánchez Y. 2015. Variables que inuyen en la distribución
y abundancia de rapaces diurnas y en la ubicación de sus sitios de
anidación em Cuba. Ph.D. esis. La Paz: Centro de Investigaciones
Biológicas del Noroeste.
Ferrer-Sánchez Y. & Rodríguez-Estrella R. 2014. Notas sobre
anidación del Gavilán Colilargo (Accipiter gundlachi) en Cuba.
Ornitología Neotropical 25: 355–361.
Ferrer-Sánchez Y. & Rodríguez-Estrella R. 2016. How rare species
conservation management can be strengthened with the use of
ecological niche modelling: the case for endangered endemic
Gundlach's Hawk and Cuban Black-Hawk. Global Ecology and
Conservation 5: 88–99.
Figueroa R.A. unpub. data apud GRIN. Global Raptor Information
Network. 2015. Additional details on Breeding. Buteo
ventralis. http:/www.globalraptors.org/grin/Species-Extended.
asp?specID=8022&catID=2006 (Access on 24 October 2016).
Figueroa R.A., Alvarado S., González-Acuña D. & Corales E.S. 2007.
Nest characteristics of the Chilean Hawk (Accipiter chilensis,
Falconiformes: Accipitridae) in an Andean Nothofagus Forest of
northern Patagonia. Studies on Neotropical Fauna and Environment
42: 1–4.
Figueroa R.A. & González-Acuña D. 2006. Prey of the Harris's Hawk
(Parabuteo unicinctus) in a suburban area of southern Chile.
Journal of Raptor Research 40: 164–168.
Figueroa R., Jiménez J.E., Bravo C.A. & Corales E.S. 2000. e diet
of the Rufous-tailed Hawk (Buteo ventralis) during the breeding
season in southern Chile. Ornitología Neotropical 11: 349–352.
Figueroa R.A., Orellana S.A., Stappung S.C. & Shehadeh I. 2004a.
Prey of breeding Chilean Hawks (Accipiter chilensis) in an Andean
Nothofagus Forest in northern Patagonia. Wilson Bulletin 116:
347–351.
Figueroa R.A., Orellana S.A., Vivanco C.B., Stappung E.S.C.,
Gonzáles B.A. & Ibarra-Vidal H. 2004b. Características de las
presas del Peuquito (Accipiter chilensis) en el bosque templado
austral. Hornero 19: 77–82.
Flesch A.D. 2008. Distribution and status of birds of conservation
interest and identication of important bird areas in Sonora, Mexico.
Tucson: Fish and Wildlife Service. http://aaronesch.com/sites/
default/files/publications/distribution-and-status-of-birds-of-
conservation-interest-and-identication-of-important-bird-areas-
in-sonora-mexico.pdf (Access on 24 October 2016).
Flesch A.D. 2009. Breeding, migratory, and wintering birds of the
Northern Jaguar Reserve, east-central Sonora, Mexico. Tucson: Jaguar
Project. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228626765_
Breeding_Migratory_and_Wintering_Birds_of_the_Northern_
Jaguar_Reserve_East-Central_Sonora_Mexico (Access on 24
October 2016).
Flesch A.D. & Saavedra E.E.L. 2008. Status and population size of
breeding grassland birds on Rancho Los Fresnos, northern Sonora,
Mexico. Technical Report. https://www.researchgate.net/
profile/Aaron_Flesch/publication/254888049_Status_and_
Population_Size_of_Breeding_Grassland_Birds_on_Rancho/
links/0a85e537f7bb1b67bd000000/Status-and-Population-
Size-of-Breeding-Grassland-Birds-on-Rancho.pdf (Access on 24
October 2016).
Fortes H. & Denis D. 2013. Parámetros reproductivos y nidicación
del Gavilán Caracolero (Rostrhamus sociabilis) en dos humedales
de Cuba. Journal of Caribbean Ornithology 26: 1–7.
Freile J.F. & Chaves J.A. 2000. Field observations on copulation by
White-rumped Hawk Buteo leucorrhous. Cotinga 14: 12.
Furman C. & Bastías D. 2012. Lista de aves de lagos de Lugano y
alrededores. https://www.losquesevan.com/archivos/lista-de-aves-
lagos-de-lugano-completa-furman-c.-y- d.pdf (Access on 24
October 2016).
FWC (Florida Wildlife Conservation Guide) [s.d.] Short-tailed Hawk
Buteo brachyurus. http://fwcg.myfwc.com/docs/short_tailed_
hawk_prole.pdf (Access on 24 October 2016).
Galetti M. & Carvalho-Jr. O. 2000. Sloths in the diet of a Harpy
Eagle nestling in eastern Amazon. Wilson Bulletin 112: 535–536.
Gelain M., Ojeda V., Trejo A., Sympson L., Amico G. & Russell
R.V. 2001. Nuevos registros de distribución y nidicación del
Aguilucho Andino (Buteo albigula) en la Patagonia Argentina.
Hornero 16: 85–88.
Gelis R.A. & Greeney H.F. 2007. Nesting of Barred Hawk (Leucopternis
princeps) in northeast Ecuador. Ornitología Neotropical 18: 607–
612.
Gerhardt R.P., Gerhardt D.M. & Vásquez M.A. 1997. Siblicide in
Swallow-tailed Kites. Wilson Bulletin 109: 112–120.
Gerhardt R.P., Gerhardt D.M. & Vásquez M.A. 2004. Food delivered
to nests of Swallow-tailed Kites in Tikal National Park, Guatemala.
Condor 106: 177–181.
Gerstell A.T. & Bednarz J.C. 1999. Competition and patterns of
resource use by two sympatrics raptors. Condor 101: 557–565.
Ghizoni-Jr. I.R. & Azevedo M.A.G. 2010. Registros de algumas aves
raras ou com distribuição pouco conhecida em Santa Catarina, sul
do Brasil, e relatos de três novas espécies para o Estado. Atualidades
Ornitológicas 154: 33–46.
Giudice R. 2007. First nesting report of the Ornate Hawk-eagle
(Spizaetus ornatus) in Peru. In: Bildstein K.L., Barber D.R. &
Zimmerman A. (eds.). Neotropical raptors. Kempton: Hawk
Mountain Sanctuary.
Giudice R., Piana R. & Williams M. 2007. Tree architecture as a
determinat factor for nest-tree selection by Harpy Eagles. In:
Bildstein K.L., Barber D.R. & Zimmerman A. (eds.). Neotropical
raptors. Kempton: Hawk Mountain Sanctuary.
Gomes F.B.R. 2014. Distribuição e ecologia do Uiraçu-falso (Morphnus
guianensis, Daudin 1800). Ph.D. esis. Manaus: INPA.
Gomes F.B.R. & Sanaiotti T.M. 2015. A review of the distribution
of the Crested Eagle, Morphnus guianensis (Daudin 1800)
(Accipitridae: Harpiinae), including range extensions. Revista
Brasileira de Ornitologia 23: 36–63.
González-Acuña D., Briones E., Ardíles K., Valenzuela-Dellarossa G.,
Corales S. & Figueroa R.A. 2009. Seasonal variation in the diet
of the White-tailed Kite (Elanus leucurus) in a suburban area of
southern Chile. Journal of Raptor Research 43: 134–141.
Review of breeding biology of Neotropical Accipitriformes
Monsalvo et al.
176
Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia 26(2): 2018 Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia 26(2): 2018
Granzinolli M.A.M. 2003. Ecologia alimentar do Gavião-do-rabo-
branco Buteo albicaudatus (Falconiformes:Accipitridae) no
município de Juiz de Fora, sudeste do estado de Minas Gerais. MSc.
Dissertation. São Paulo: Universidade de São Paulo.
Granzinolli M.A.M. & Motta-Junior J.C. 2006. Small mammal
selection by the White-tailed Hawk in southeastern Brazil. Wilson
Journal of Ornithology 118: 91–98.
Granzinolli M.A.M. & Motta-Junior J.C. 2007. Feeding ecology
of the White-tailed Hawk (Buteo albicaudatus) in south-eastern
Brazil. Emu 107: 214–222.
Granzinolli M.A.M., Pereira R.J.G. & Motta-Junior J.C. 2006. e
Crowned Solitary-eagle Harpyhaliaetus coronatus (Accipitridae) in
the Cerrado of Estação Ecológica de Itirapina, southeast Brazil.
Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia 14: 429–432.
Greeney H.F. & Gelis R.A. 2008. Further breeding records from the
Ecuadorian Amazonian lowlands. Cotinga 29: 62–68.
Greeney H.F., Gelis R. & Funk W.C. 2008. Predation on caecilians
(Caecilia orientalis) by barred hawks (Leucopternis princeps)
depends on rainfall. Herpetological Review 39: 162–164.
Greeney H.F., Gelis R.A. & White R. 2004. Notes on breeding
birds from an Ecuadorian lowland forest. Bulletin of the British
Ornithologists' Club 124: 28–37.
Greeney H.F., Martin P.R., Gelis R.A., Solano-Ugalde A., Bonier
F., Freeman B. & Miller E.T. 2011. Notes on the breeding of
high-Andean birds in northern Ecuador. Bulletin of the British
Ornithologists' Club 131: 24–31.
Greeney H.F. & Nunnery T. 2006. Notes on the breeding of north-
west Ecuadorian birds. Bulletin of the British Ornithologists' Club
126: 38–45.
Gruber J.E. 2009. Targeting potential conservation sites for Swallow-
Tailed Kites (Elanoides forcatus) in Levy County, Florida. MSc.
project proposal. Durham: Duke University.
Gussoni C.O.A. & Guaraldo A.C. 2008. Aves do câmpus da UNESP
em Rio Claro. Rio Claro: Author's edition.
Hahn I.J., Vergara P.M. & Römer U. 2011. Importance of nest attributes
in the conservation of endemic birds of the Juan Fernández
Archipelago, Chile. Bird Conservation International 21: 460–476.
Haralson C.L. 2008. Breeding ecology nest site selection and human
inuence of White-tailed Hawk on the Texas Barrier Islands.
Lubbock: Texas Tech University.
Harvey M.G., Lane D.F., Hite J., Terrill R.S., Ramírez S.F., Smith
B.T., Klicka J. & Campos W.V. 2014. Notes on bird species in
bamboo in northern Madre de Dios, Peru, including the rst
Peruvian record of Acre Tody-Tyrant (Hemitriccus cohnhafti).
Occasional Papers of the Museum of Natural Science, Louisiana State
University 81: 1–38.
Hayes F.E. 2014. Breeding season and clutch size of birds at Sapucái,
Departamento Paraguarí, Paraguay. Boletín del Museo Nacional de
Historia del Paraguay 18: 77–97.
Hennessey A.B., Herzog S.A., Kessler M. & Robison D. 2003.
Avifauna of the Pilón Lajas Biosphere Reserve and Communal
Lands, Bolivia. Bird Conservation International 13: 319–349.
Henry P.Y. & Aznar J.C. 2009. Eco-climatic correlates of occurrences
of the White-throated Hawk (Buteo albigula) and Cinereous
Harrier (Circus cinerous(sic)) in central Ecuador. Ornitología
Neotropical 20: 511–521.
Hernández-Vázquez S., Rodríguez-Estrella R., Ramírez-Ortega F.,
Loera J. & Ortega M. 2013. Recent increase in the distribution
of the Snail Kite (Rostrhamus sociabilis) along the central Pacic
coast of Mexico. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 84: 388–391.
Hiraldo F., Donázar J.A., Ceballos O., Travaini A., Bustamante J.
& Funes M. 1995. Breeding biology of a Grey Eagle-Buzzard
population in Patagonia. Wilson Bulletin 107: 675–685.
Höing E. & Camargo H.F.A. 2002. Aves no Campus da Cidade
Universitária Armando Salles de Oliveira. São Paulo: Edusp/
Instituto de Biociências.
Howell T.R. 2010. omas R. Howell's check-list of the birds of
Nicaragua as of 1993. Ornithological Monographs 68: 1–108.
Ibáñez R., Condit R., Angehr G., Aguilar S., García T., Martínez R.,
Sanjur A., Stallard R., Wright S.J., Rand A.S. & Heckadon S.
2002. An ecosystem report on the Panama Canal: monitoring the
status of the forest communities and the watershed. Environmental
Monitoring and Assessment 80: 65–95.
Ignazi G.O. 2015. Ground nesting by Black-chested Buzzard-Eagles
(Geranoaetus melanoleucus). Journal of Raptor Research 49: 101–103.
Imberti S. 2003. Notes on the distribution and natural history of some
birds in Santa Cruz and Tierra del Fuego provinces, Patagonia,
Argentina. Cotinga 19: 15–24.
Jacomassa F.A.F. 2011. Observações em um ninho de Sovi Ictinia
plumbea (Gmelin, 1788) (Falconiformes: Accipitridae) no sul do
Brasil. Biotemas 24: 77–82.
Jaksic F.M., Iriarte J.A. & Jiménez J.E. 2002. Las rapaces del parque
Nacional Torres del Paine, Chile: biodiversidad y conservación.
Revista Chilena de Historia Natural 75: 449–461.
Jaksic F.M. & Lazo I. 1999. Response of a bird assemblage in semiarid
Chile to the 1997–1998 El Niño. Wilson Bulletin 111: 527–535.
Jaramillo M.C. & Vargas H. 2010. O Gavião-de-Galápagos (Buteo
galapagoensis): vivendo em um ambiente em constante mudança.
Spizaetus 10: 2–7.
Jenner T., Komar O. & Narish A. 2007. Noteworthy bird records
from the Gulf of Fonseca, Honduras. Cotinga 28: 13–20.
Jiménez J.E. 1995. Historia natural del Aguilucho Buteo polyosoma:
una revisión. Hornero 14: 1–9.
Jiménez C. & Zook J. 2007. Dos comentarios: poblaciones de
Rostrhamus sociabilis Caracolero/Snail Kite en Guanacaste.
Zeledonia 11: 23.
Joenck C.M., Zilio F. & Mendonça-Lima A. 2011. First record of
breeding of the Ornate Hawk-Eagle (Spizaetus ornatus) in
southern Brazil. Hornero 26: 163–166.
Joenck C.M., Zilio F. & Mendonça-Lima A. 2013. Successful
translocation of a nestling Ornate Hawk-eagle (Spizaetus ornatus)
in southern Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia 21: 136–140.
Jones H.L. 2002. Central America. North American Birds 56: 369–
371.
Jones H.L. 2005. Central America. North American Birds 59: 506–
510.
Jones H.L. & Komar O. 2008a. Central America. North American
Birds 62: 163–170.
Joppert A.M. 2007. Estudo prospectivo das causas de morte de
Falconiformes e Strigiformes de vida livre no município de São Paulo.
Ph.D. esis. São Paulo: Universidade de São Paulo.
Kennedy P.L., Crowe D.E. & Dean T.F. 1995. Breeding biology of the
Zone-tailed Hawk at the limit of its distribution. Journal of Raptor
Research 29: 110–116.
Kilpp J.C. 2015. Novos registros de Buteogallus coronatus e Spizaetus
ornatus para o estado de Santa Catarina, Brasil. Nuestras Aves 60:
49–50.
Kirwan G.M. 2009. First nesting record of the White-Browed Hawk
(Leucopternis kuhli) from the Madeira-Purus interuvium,
Brazilian Amazonia, with some remarks on plumage variation.
Ornitología Neotropical 20: 147–151.
Kirwan G.M. & Shirihai H. 2008. Notes on open-country birds in
the Brazilian state of Rondônia. Cotinga 29: 178–180.
Kjeldsen J.P. 2013. Aves del municipio Río Prinzapolka, um inventario
de base. Wani 41: 31–64.
Knight T. 2010. e abundance and diversity of raptors along three
riverine transects within the Pacaya-Samiria National Reserve, Peru.
Research Project. Canterbury: University of Kent.
Kohler G.U. & Rezini J.A. 2013. Occasional observations on the
courtship behavior of Black-and-white Hawk-Eagle, Spizaetus
melanoleucus, at Santa Catarina state, southern Brazil. Atualidades
Ornitológicas 171: 26.
Review of breeding biology of Neotropical Accipitriformes
Monsalvo et al.
177
Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia 26(2): 2018 Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia 26(2): 2018
Krügel M.M. 2003. Registro documentado de Chondrohierax
uncinatus (Temminck, 1822) (Falconiformes: Accipitridae) para o
Rio Grande do Sul. Ararajuba 11: 83–84.
Kuniy A.A., Viana M.A., Zahn T.M.G., Lazarinos D.E.A. & Portes
C.E.B. 2015. Translocation of Harpy Eagle (Harpia harpyja)
(Linnaeus, 1758) nest. Brazilian Journal of Biology 75: 1035–1036.
Lees A.C. & Martin R.W. 2014. Exposing hidden endemism in a
Neotropical forest raptor using citizen science. Ibis 157: 103–114.
Leveau L.M., Leveau C.M. & Pardiñas U.F.J. 2004. Trophic
relationships between White-tailed Kites (Elanus leucurus)
and Barn Owls (Tyto alba) in southern Buenos Aires province,
Argentina. Journal of Raptor Research 38: 178–181.
Licence K.L. & McCarty K.M. 2015. Observation of rare cli-nesting
behavior in Common Black Hawk. Journal of Raptor Research 49:
523–525.
Lima B. & Ribeiro M. 2011. Records of Grey-bellied Hawk
(Accipiter poliogaster) in the municipality of Peruíbe, São Paulo,
Brazil. Programa Ambiental A Última Arca de N. http://
www.aultimaarcadenoe.com.br/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/
Registro_doc_Accipiter_- poliogaster-Peruibe-SP-BR-BLima-
MRibeiro-ing.pdf (Access on 24 October 2016).
Lobos R.P., Munõz L. & Rodríguez R. 2007. First record of natural
mortality in a nestling Crowned Solitary Eagle (Harpyhaliaetus
solitarius) in the desert of Lavalle, Mendoza province, Argentina.
In: Bildstein K.L., Barber D.R. & Zimmerman A. (eds.).
Neotropical raptors. Kempton: Hawk Mountain Sanctuary.
Lobos R.P., Santander F.J., Alvarado S., Ramírez P.A., Munõz L. &
Bellón D.F. 2011. Diet of the Crowned Eagle (Harpyhaliaetus
coronatus) during the breeding season in the Monte Desert,
Mendoza, Argentina. Journal of Raptor Research 45: 180‒183.
Lopes L.E. & Braz V.S. 2007. Aves da região de Pedro Afonso,
Tocantins, Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia 15: 530–537.
Lopes L.E., Pinho J.B., Bernardon B., Oliveira F.F., Bernardon G.,
Ferreira L.P., Vasconcelos M.F., Maldonado-Coelho M., Nóbrega
P.F.A & Rubio T.C. 2009. Aves da Chapada dos Guimarães, Mato
Grosso, Brasil: uma síntese histórica do conhecimento. Papéis
Avulsos de Zoologia 49: 9–47.
Lüthi H. 2011. Birdwatching in Peru: 1963–2006. Revista Peruana de
Biología 18: 27–90.
Luz B.B. 2005. Características de árvores emergentes utilizadas por
Gavião-real (Harpia harpyja) para nidicação no centro e leste da
Amazônia Brasileira. MSc. Dissertation. Manaus: INPA/UFAM.
Maceda J.J. 2007. Biología y conservación del Águila Coronada
(Harpyhaliaetus coronatus) en Argentina. Hornero 22: 159–171.
Maceda J.J. & Kin M.S. 2001. Lista de las aves de la Facultad de
Agronomía de Santa Rosa (La Pampa) y sus alrededores. Revista
Facultad de Agronomía 12: 21–30.
Maceda J., Salvador V., Santillán M., Reyes M., Bragagnolo L.,
Lanusse A., Solaro C., Sarasola J., Sympson L. & Bechard M.J.
2007. Behavior and monitoring of nests of the Crowned Solitary
Eagle (Harpyhaliaetus solitarius) in central Argentina using a video
camera. In: Bildstein K.L., Barber D.R. & Zimmerman A. (eds.).
Neotropical raptors. Kempton: Hawk Mountain Sanctuary.
Maceda J.J., Sarasola J.H., Emilio M. & Pessino M. 2003. Presas
consumidas por el Águila Coronada (Harpyhaliaetus coronatus) en
el límite sur de su rango de distribución en Argentina. Ornitología
Neotropical 14: 419–422.
Machado A.B.M., Fonseca G.A.B., Machado R.B., Aguiar L.M.S. &
Lins L.V. 1998. Livro vermelho das espécies ameaçadas de extinção
da fauna de Minas Gerais. Belo Horizonte: Fundação Biodiversitas.
Machado É., Correa G., Pagotto C. & Lobo L. 2015. Monitoramento
e translocação de ninhos de aves no âmbito de atividades de
resgate de fauna em empreendimento hidrelétrico. Foz do Iguaçu:
XXX Seminário Nacional de Grandes Barragens.
Maciel T.T., Barbosa B.C. & Paschoalini M. 2016. Unusual behavior
of Alouatta clamitans Cabrera, 1940 inspecting a bird nest. Revista
Brasileira de Biociências 14: 53–54.
Maragliano R. & Montalti D. 1997. Estatus de residencia,
categorización tróca y abundancia de aves en el Zoológico de La
Plata, Argentina. Doñana, Acta Vertebrata 24: 103–114.
Marini M.Â., Aguilar T.M., Andrade R.D., Leite L.O., Anciães M.,
Carvalho C.E.A., Duca C., Maldonado-Coelho M., Sebaio F. &
Gonçalves J. 2007. Biologia da nidicação de aves do sudeste de
Minas Gerais, Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia 15: 367–376.
Marini M.Â., Borges F.J.A., Lopes L.E., Sousa N.O.M., Gressler
D.T., Santos L.R., Paiva L.V., Duca C., Manica L.T., Rodrigues
S.S., França L.F., Costa P.M., França L.C., Heming N.M.,
Silveira M.B., Pereira Z.P., Lobo Y., Medeiros R.C.S & Roper J.J.
2012. Breeding biology of birds in the Cerrado of central Brazil.
Ornitología Neotropical 23: 385–405.
Márquez C., Bechard M., Gast F. & Vanegas V.H. 2005. Aves rapaces
diurnas de Colombia. Bogotá: Instituto de Investigación de
Recursos Biológicos “Alexander von Humboldt”.
Marsden M., Miller M. & Clark W.S. 2016. Winter nesting of the
White-tailed Kite in south Texas. Bulletin of the Texas Ornithological
Society 49: 84–85.
Martínez C. 1998. Ocorrência reprodutiva do Gaviãozinho,
Gampsonyx swainsonii (Aves: Accipitridae) em São Luís do
Maranhão. Ararajuba 6: 58–59.
Maurício G.N., Bencke G.A., Repenning M., Machado D.B., Dias
R.A. & Bugoni L. 2013. Review of the breeding status of birds in
Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Iheringia, Série Zoologia 103: 163–184.
Maurício G.N. & Dias R.A. 1996. Novos registros e extensões de
distribuição de aves palustres e costeiras no litoral sul do Rio
Grande do Sul. Ararajuba 4: 47–51.
May R.H. 2010. Fotos de Tortuguero. Zaledonia 14: 33–37.
McMillian M.A. & Pranty B. 1997. Recent nesting of the White-tailed
Kite in central Florida. Florida Field Naturalist 25: 143–145.
Medel-Hidalgo J., Rivas-Fuenzalida T., Asciones-Contreras N. &
Figueroa R.A. 2013. A note on incubation behavior of Rufous-
tailed Hawk (Buteo ventralis) in southern Chile. Spizaetus 15:
10–17.
Medel-Hidalgo J., Rivas-Fuenzalida T., Asciones-Contreras N. &
Figueroa R.A. 2015. Nest site descriptions for Chilean Hawks
(Accipiter chilensis) in the Valdivian coastal range, southern Chile.
Boletín Chileno de Ornitología 21: 59–65.
Mee A., Olson J., Stewart I., Wilson M., Örn P. & Ferreyra J.D. 2002.
e cerros de El Sira revisited: birds of submontane and montane
forest. Cotinga 18: 46–57.
Mendonça-Lima A., Zilio F., Joenck C.M. & Barcellos A. 2006.
Novos registros de Spizaetus ornatus (Accipitridae) no sul do
Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia 14: 279–282.
Meyer D. 2016. Novos registros de aves para o estado de Santa
Catarina, sul do Brasil. Cotinga 38: 1–8.
Meyer K.D. 2004. Breeding and wintering ecology of the Short-tailed
Hawk (Buteo brachyurus) in Florida. Final Report. Tallahassee:
Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission.
Meyer K.D. 2005. Biology and conservation needs of the Short-tailed
Hawk in Florida. Final Report. Tallahassee: Florida Fish and
Wildlife Conservation Commission.
Meyer K.D. & Collopy M.W. 1995. Status, distribution, and habitat
requirements of the American Swallow-tailed Kite (Elanoides
forcatus) in Florida. Project Report. Tallahassee: Florida Game
and Fresh Water Fish Commission.
Meyer K.D., McGehee S.M. & Collopy M.W. 2004. Food deliveries
at Swallow-tailed Kite nests in southern Florida. Condor 106:
171–176.
Meyer K.D. & Zimmerman G.M. 2007. A monitoring plan for the rare
Short-tailed Hawk (Buteo brachyurus): tests of survey protocols for
statistical adequacy and logistic feasibility. Final Report. Tallahassee:
Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission.
Mikich S.B. & Bérnils R.S. 2004. Livro vermelho da fauna ameaçada
no estado do Paraná. Curitiba: Instituto Ambiental do Paraná.
Mojica D.R.M. 2012. Aerial locked-talon display of Rupornis
Review of breeding biology of Neotropical Accipitriformes
Monsalvo et al.
178
Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia 26(2): 2018 Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia 26(2): 2018
magnirostris in Bolivia. Spizaetus 13: 23–26.
Monsalvo J.A.B. 2012. Reprodução de Buteo brachyurus em um parque
urbano de São Paulo, sudeste do Brasil. Atualidades Ornitológicas
170: 33–40.
Montalvo C.I., Fernández F.J., Galmes M.A., Santillán M.A. &
Cereghetti J. 2015. Crowned Solitary Eagle (Buteogallus coronatus)
as accumulator of armadillo osteoderms in the archaeological
record? An actualistic taphonomic study for central Argentina.
Quaternary International 391: 90–99.
Montalvo C.I., Fernández F.J., Liébana M.S., Santillán M. & Sarasola
J.H. 2014. Taphonomic analysis of rodent bone accumulations
produced by the White-tailed Kite (Elanus leucurus,
Accipitriformes) in central Argentina. Journal of Archaeological
Science 52: 354–362.
Motta-Junior J.C., Granzinolli M.A.M. & Monteiro A.R. 2010.
Miscellaneous ecological notes on Brazilian birds of prey and owls.
Biota Neotropica 10: 355–359.
Muela A. & Valdez U. 2003. First report of the nest of the Barred
Hawk (Leucopternis princeps) in Panama. Ornitología Neotropical
14: 267–268.
Muñiz-López R. 2005. Discovery of the rst Harpy Eagle (Harpia
harpyja) nest on the western side of the Andean Cordillera.
Newsletter of the Neotropical Raptor Network 2: 1–2.
Muñiz-López R., Limiana R., Cortés G.D. & Urios V. 2012.
Movements of Harpy Eagles Harpia harpyja during their rst two
years after hatching. Bird Study 59: 509–514.
Muñoz D.A.M. 2012. Ecología alimentaria del Gavilán de Galápagos
(Buteo galapagoensis) en la Isla Santiago, Galápagos, después de la
erradicación de la cabra (Capra hircus) y monitoreo del Gavilán de
Galápagos. Bachelor's Monograph. Guayaquil: Universidad de
Guayaquil.
Naka L.N. & Rodrigues M. 2000. As aves da Ilha de Santa Catarina.
Florianópolis: Editora da UFSC.
Naka L.N., Rodrigues M., Roos A.L. & Azevedo M.A.G. 2002. Bird
conservation on Santa Catarina Island, southern Brazil. Bird
Conservation International 12: 123–150.
Narozky T. & Martelli A. 1995. Una nueva visita al este de Formosa.
Nuestras Aves 31: 28–29.
Navarro R., Marín G. & Muñoz J. 2007. Notas sobre la ecología
reproductiva de trés accipítridos em Venezuela. Ornitología
Neotropical 18: 453–457.
Naveda-Rodríguez A. 2002. Descripción de los aspectos ecológicos
de grandes aves de presa en el Parque Nacional Henri Pittier,
Venezuela. Panamá: Conferencia Sobre Aves Rapaces Neotropicales
y Simposio del Águila Arpía.
Naveda-Rodríguez A. 2004. Contribution to the natural history of
Ornate Hawk-Eagle Spizaetus ornatus (Daudin, 1801) and Great
Black-Hawk Buteogallus urubitinga (Gmelin, 1788). Revista de
Ecologia Latino-America 11: 23–26.
Niemela C.A. 2007. Landscape characteristics surrounding White-tailed
Kite nests in southwestern California. MSc. Dissertation. Arcata:
Humboldt State University.
Norambuena H.V, Raimilla V. & Jiménez J.E. 2012. Breeding
behavior of a pair of Rufous-tailed Hawks (Buteo ventralis) in
southern Chile. Journal of Raptor Research 46: 211–215.
Norambuena H.V., Zamorano S. & Muñoz-Pedreros A. 2013.
Nesting of the Rufous-tailed Hawk Buteo ventralis on a rocky wall
in southern Chile. Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia 21: 124–125.
Ojeda V.S., Bechard M.J. & Lanusse A. 2004. Primer registro de
nidicación del Peuquito (Accipiter chilensis) en Argentina.
Hornero 19: 41–43.
Ojeda V., Gelain M., Sympson L. & Trejo A. 2003. Desarrollo
morfológico y conductual de pollos del aguilucho chico Buteo
albigula (Aves: Accipitridae) en el noroeste de la Patagonia
argentina. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural 76: 451–457.
Oliveira R.A., Camargo F.V. & Serrano-Filho A.E.K. 2015.
Levantamento preliminar de aves de rapina diurnas (Falconiformes
e Cathartiformes) em fragmento de mata Atlântica do município
de Brasópolis, Minas Gerais. Revista Cientíca da FEPI 8: 1–3.
Olmos F. & Albano C. 2012. As aves da região do Parque Nacional
Serra da Capivara (Piauí, Brasil). Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia
20: 173–187.
Olmos F., Pacheco J.F. & Silveira L.F. 2006. Notas sobre aves de rapina
(Cathartidae, Acciptridae(sic) e Falconidae) brasileiras. Revista
Brasileira de Ornitologia 14: 401–404.
O'Shea B.J. & Ramcharan S. 2012. Avifauna of the Kwamalasamutu
Region, Suriname. RAP Bulletin of Biological Assessment 10: 131–
143.
Pacheco J.F., Kirwan G.M., Aleixo A., Whitney B.M., Whittaker A.,
Minns J., Zimmer K.J., Fonseca P.S.M., Lima M.F.C. & Oren
D.C. 2007. An avifaunal inventory of the CVRD Serra dos
Carajás project, Pará, Brazil. Cotinga 27: 15–30.
Palmer K. 2011. Snail Kite (Rostrhamus sociabilis plumbeus), p. 171–
177. In: Scientic and technical knowledge gained in Everglades
restoration. http://141.232.10.32/shared- denition/shared_def_
docs/sd_2010/081811_skd/081811_skd_4-1-4-1.pdf (Access on
24 October 2016).
Palmer R. 1998. Mexico–Colima & Jalisco. In: Birding the Americas
Trip Report and Planning Repository. http://maybank.tripod.com/
Mexico/Colima-Jalisco-09-98.htm (Access on 24 October 2016).
Panasci T. unpub. data apud GRIN. 2012. Additional details on
Breeding. Rupornis magnirostris. http://www.globalraptors.org/
grin/SpeciesExtended.asp?specID=8015&catID=2006 (Access on
24 October 2016).
Panasci T. & Whitacre D. 2000. Diet and foraging behavior of nesting
Roadside Hawks in Petén, Guatemala. Wilson Bulletin 112: 555–
558.
Panasci T.A. & Whitacre D.F. 2002. Roadside Hawk breeding ecology
in forest and farming landscapes. Wilson Bulletin 114: 114–121.
Patrikeev M. 2007. Notes on the nesting of the Gray Hawk (Buteo
nitidus) in Bentsen-Rio Grande Valley State Park, Texas. Texas
Birds Annual 3: 14–15.
Patten M.A. & Erickson R.A. 2000. Population uctuations of the
Harris' Hawk (Parabuteo unicinctus) and its reappearance in
California. Journal of Raptor Research 34: 187–195.
Pavez E.F. 2001. Biología reproductiva del Águila Geranoaetus
melanoleucus (Aves: Accipitridae) en Chile central. Revista Chilena
de Historia Natural 74: 687–697.
Pavez E.F. & González C.A. 1998. Registro de nidicacion de Peuquito
(Accipiter chilensis) en la region metropolitana. Boletín Chileno de
Ornitología 5: 27–28.
Pavez E.F., González C., González B.A., Saucedo C., Alvarado S.,
Gabella J.P. & Arnello A. 2004. Nesting of the White-throated
Hawk (Buteo albigula) in deciduous forests of central Chile.
Journal of Raptor Research 38: 186–189.
Peña C., Wiley J.W., Ocaña F., Vega A., Navarro N., Sigarreta S. &
González P.A. 2012. e avifaunal composition in the Río Mayarí
Delta, northeastern Cuba. Journal of Caribbean Ornithology 25: 7–14.
Pereira G.A., Dantas S.M. & Periquito M.C. 2006. Possível registro
de Leptodon forbesi no Estado de Pernambuco, Brasil. Revista
Brasileira de Ornitologia 14: 441–444.
Pereira A.M.M. & Salzo I. 2006. Primeiro registro da nidicação
de Harpia harpyja (Falconiformes, Accipitridae) na Serra da
Bodoquena (Mato Grosso do Sul, Brasil). Revista Brasileira de
Ornitologia 14: 157–160.
Pérez M.A.U. 2015. Conducta reproductiva de una pareja de Águilas
Chilenas (Geranoaetus melanoleucus) en la Cordillera Central de
Santiago. Bachelor's Monograph. Santiago: Universidad de Chile.
Pérez-León R.A. 2007. Composición y estructura de comunidades de aves
rapaces diurnas y sus implicaciones para sistemas agropecuarios en
paisajes fragmentados de la costa de El Salvador. MSc. Dissertation.
Turrialba: CATIE.
Review of breeding biology of Neotropical Accipitriformes
Monsalvo et al.
179
Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia 26(2): 2018 Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia 26(2): 2018
Peterson A.T., Navarro-Sigüenza A.G., Hernández-Banos B.E.,
Escalona-Segura G., Rebón-Gallardo F., Rodríguez-Ayala
E., Figueroa-Esquivel E.M. & Cabrera-García L. 2003. e
Chimalapas region, Oaxaca, Mexico: a high-priority region for
bird conservation in Mesoamerica. Bird Conservation International
13: 227–253.
Petracci P.F. & Basanta D. 2002. Efectos positivos de la nidicación del
Macá Común (Rollandia rolland) en una colonia de Caracoleros
(Rostrhamus sociabilis). Ornitología Neotropical 13: 113–119.
Phillips R. 2009. Studying Hawk-eagles in Belize. Neotropical Raptor
Network 7: 1.
Phillips R. 2012. An active nest of the rare Solitary Eagle Harpyhaliaetus
solitarius discovered in Belize. Spizaetus 13: 2–8.
Phillips R.A. & Hatten C.J. 2013. Nest observations on the Ornate
Hawk-Eagle (Spizaetus ornatus) in Belize, Central America. Boletín
SAO 21: 1–9.
Phillips R. & Martínez R. 2013. Solitary Eagle Project Report.
Campbell: Belize Raptor Research Institute.
Phillips R., Martínez R., Sanchez M., Cordova M., Bradshaw A.
& Britt C. 2014. Nest and nest-site characteristics and prey of
the Solitary Eagle Buteogallus solitarius. Corpus Christi: Raptor
Research Foundation Annual Conference.
Phillips R.A., Meerman J., Boomsma T., Howe R., Martinez R.,
Bourbour R., Bradshaw & Mai I. 2015. Breeding biology of
the Hook-billed Kite in Belize: a successful triple brooding.
Sacramento: Raptor Research Foundation Annual Conference.
Phillips R. & Seminario Y. 2009. Caracterização da idade em Spizaetus
melanoleucus: primeira documentação fotográca. Neotropical
Raptor Network 8: 1–5.
Piana R.P. 2002. El Águila Arpía (Harpia harpyja) en la comunidad
nativa de Inerno, Madre de Dios, Perú. Panamá: Conferencia
Sobre Aves Rapaces Neotropicales y Simposio del Águila Arpía.
Piana R. 2007. Nesting and diet of Harpia harpyja Linnaeus in the
native community of Inerno, Madre de Dios, Peru. Revista
Peruana de Biología 14: 135–138.
Pimentel L. & Olmos F. 2011. e birds of Reserva Ecológica
Guapiaçu (REGUA), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Cotinga 33: 6–22.
Pinheiro R.T. & Dornas T. 2009. Distribuição e conservação de aves
na região do Cantão, Tocantins: ecótono Amazônia/Cerrado.
Biota Neotropica 9: 187–205.
Pinto-Ledezma J.N. & Justiniano M.Á.A. 2013. Notas sobre la
reproducción de aves en la Reserva de Vida Silvestre Ríos Blanco y
Negro, Santa Cruz-Bolivia. Kempana 9: 21–25.
Posso S., Cintra F. & Frias J. 2012. Temporal inuence on foraging
strategies, territoriality and nomadic tendencies of Snail Kite,
Rosthramus sociabilis (Viellot, 1817) in an urban Neotropical
wetland. Brazilian Journal of Biology 72: 235–241.
Pranty B. & McMillian M.A. 1997. Status of the White-tailed Kite
in northern and central Florida. Florida Field Naturalist 25: 117–
127.
Raimilla V., Norambuena H.V. & Jiménez J.E. 2013. A record of
reverse mounting in the Rufous-tailed Hawk (Buteo ventralis) in
southern Chile. Journal of Raptor Research 47: 326–327.
Raimilla V., Rivas-Fuenzalida T., Kusch A., Díaz J., Toledo J., García
Á. & Jiménez J.E. 2015. Incidence of cartwheeling ights in
raptors of south-central Chile. Wilson Journal of Ornithology 127:
289–297.
Raine A.F. 2007. Breeding bird records from the Tambopata-
Candamo Reserve Zone, Madre de Dios, south-east Peru. Cotinga
28: 53–58.
Rappole J.H., Blacklock G.W. & Norwine J. 2007. Apparent rapid
range change in south Texas birds: response to climate change?
p. 133–146. In: Norwine J. & Kuruvila J. (eds.). e changing
climate of south Texas, 1900–2100: problems and prospects, impacts
and implications. Kingsville: Texas A&M University.
Reichert B.E. 2009. Eects of aging and the environment on Snail Kite
demography: a reassessment of Snail Kite (Rostrhamus sociabilis
plumbeus) vital rates. MSc. Dissertation. Gainesville: University
of Florida.
Reichert B.E., Cattau C.E., Fletcher-Jr. R.J., Kendall W.L. &
Kitchens W.M. 2012. Extreme weather and experience inuence
reproduction in an endangered bird. Ecology 93: 2580–2589.
Reichle S., Justiniano H., Vides R. & Herrera M. 2003. Aves del
Bosque Chiquitano y Pantanal Boliviano. Santa Cruz de La Sierra:
Editorial FAN.
Reid S., Cornelius C., Barbosa O., Meynard C., Silva-García C. &
Marquet P.A. 2002. Conservation of temperate forest birds in
Chile: implications from the study of an isolated forest relict.
Biodiversity and Conservation 11: 1975–1990.
Rettig N. 2002. Información adicional sobre la conducta de anidación
del Águila Arpía. Panamá: Conferencia Sobre Aves Rapaces
Neotropicales y Simposio del Águila Arpía.
Rivas-Fuenzalida T. 2015a. Posible poliginia en el Aguilucho de Cola
Rojiza (Buteo ventralis) en el sur de Chile. Boletín Chileno de
Ornitología 21: 147–150.
Rivas-Fuenzalida T. 2015b. Registro de monta inversa en el Peuquito
(Accipiter chilensis) en el sur de Chile. Boletín Chileno de Ornitología
21: 144–146.
Rivas-Fuenzalida T. & Asciones-Contreras N. 2013. Primer registro
de nidicación sobre un acantilado rocoso para el Aguilucho Cola
Rojiza (Buteo ventralis) en el sur de Chile. Hornero 28: 31–34.
Rivas-Fuenzalida T. & Asciones-Contreras N. 2015. Nidicación del
Aguilucho de Cola Rojiza (Buteo ventralis) en árboles muertos en
pie en el sur de Chile. Boletín Chileno de Ornitología 21: 141–143
Rivas-Fuenzalida T., Asciones-Contreras N. & Figueroa R.A. 2015a.
Estatus reproductivo del Aguilucho de Cola Rojiza (Buteo
ventralis) en el norte de su distribución en Chile. Boletín Chileno
de Ornitología 21: 5–58.
Rivas-Fuenzalida T., Asciones-Contreras N., Maureira A., Almonacid
M., Cifuentes E. & Roa K. 2015b. Nidicación del Aguilucho
Chico (Buteo albigula) en un hábitat exótico dentro de un área
urbana del sur de Chile. Boletín Chileno de Ornitología 21: 135–
140.
Rivas-Fuenzalida T., Asciones-Contreras N., Medel-Hidalgo J.
& Figueroa R.A. 2015c. Nidicación del Peuquito (Accipiter
chilensis) en plantaciones comerciales de Pino Insigne (Pinus
radiata) en la Cordillera de Nahuelbuta, sur de Chile. Boletín
Chileno de Ornitología 21: 66–75.
Rivas-Fuenzalida T., Medel-Hidalgo J. & Figueroa R.A. 2011.
Reproducción del Aguilucho Cola Rojiza (Buteo ventralis) en
remanentes de bosque lluvioso templado de La Araucanía, sur de
Chile. Ornitología Neotropical 22: 405–420.
Rivas-Fuenzalida T., Medel Hidalgo J. & Figueroa R. 2013. Nesting
territory characteristics of a migratory South American forest hawk,
the White-throated Hawk (Buteo albigula) (Aves: Accipitridae),
in temperate rainforest remnants of Araucanía, southern Chile.
Journal of Natural History 47: 1129–1142.
Rivas-Fuenzalida T., Norambuena H. & Raimilla V. 2009. New
research on the Rufous-tailed Hawk (Buteo ventralis) in southern
Chile. Spizaetus 8: 8–9.
Rivas-Fuenzalida T., Costa M. & Asciones-Contreras N. 2016. Primer
registro de nidicación y nuevos datos de presencia del Aguilucho
Cola Rojiza (Buteo ventralis) en la Patagonia Argentina. Nótulas
Faunísticas 199: 1–16.
Rivera J.L., Vargas F.H. & Parker P.G. 2011. Natal dispersal and
sociality of young Galapagos Hawks on Santiago Island. Open
Ornithology Journal 4: 12–16.
Rizkalla C.E., erien J. & Savage A. 2009. Observations of nesting
Short-tailed Hawks (Buteo brachyurus) in central Florida. Florida
Field Naturalist 37: 1–32.
Rodgers-Jr. J.A. 1996. Measurements of Snail Kite eggs from central
Florida. Wilson Bulletin 108: 804–807.
Review of breeding biology of Neotropical Accipitriformes
Monsalvo et al.
180
Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia 26(2): 2018 Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia 26(2): 2018
Rodgers-Jr. J.A. 2007. Breeding success of Rostrhamus sociabilis (Snail
Kites) at two Florida lakes. Southeastern Naturalist 6: 35–46.
Rodgers-Jr. J.A. & Schwikert S.T. 2003. Breeding chronology of Snail
Kites (Rostrhamus sociabilis plumbeus) in central and south Florida
wetlands. Southeastern Naturalist 2: 293–300.
Rodgers-Jr. J.A., Smith H.T. & ayer D.D. 2001. Integrating
nonindigenous aquatic plant control with protection of Snail Kite
nests in Florida. Environmental Management 28: 31–37.
Roesler I., Formoso A.E., Moschione F.N., Juhant M.A. & Podestá
D.H. 2008. Nuevos registros del Águila Poma (Spizaetus isidori)
y comentarios sobre su conservación en Argentina. Ornitología
Neotropical 19: 611–616.
Román R.A. & Wiley J.W. 2012. Bird egg and nest specimens in the
collection of the Instituto de Ecología y Sistemática, La Habana,
Cuba. Journal of Caribbean Ornithology 25: 15–23.
Romano M., Barberis I.M., Luppi M. & Pagano F. 2015. Non-
passerine birds from Laguna Melincué Ramsar Site, Santa Fe
province, Argentina. Check List 11: 1799.
Rompré G., Aubry Y. & Kirkconnell A. 1999. Notes on some Cuban
birds. Cotinga 11: 31–33.
Rotenberg A.J., Marlin J., Meacham S. & Tolfree S. 2000. An
integrated community-based Harpy Eagle and avian conservation
program for the Maya Mountains Massif, Belize. Proceedings of
the Fourth International Partners in Flight Conference: Tundra to
Tropics, p. 493‒507.
Rotenberg J.A., Marlin J.A., Pop L. & Garcia W. 2012. First record
of a Harpy Eagle (Harpia harpyja) nest in Belize. Wilson Journal of
Ornithology 124: 292–297.
Ruvalcaba-Ortega I. & González-Rojas J.I. 2009. New records for
Coahuila from a riparian bird community in northern Mexico.
Southwestern Naturalist 54: 501–509.
Sadoti G. 2008. Nest-site selection by Common Black-Hawks in
southwestern New Mexico. Journal of Field Ornithology 79: 11–
19.
Sadoti G. 2012. Nesting ecology of Common Black-hawks in relation
to landscape features. Journal of Raptor Research 46: 296–303.
Saggese M.D. & de Lucca E.R. 1995. Reproducción del Gavilán
Ceniciento Circus cinereus en la Patagonia argentina. Hornero 14:
21–26.
Saggese M.D. & de Lucca E.R. 2001. Biología reproductiva del Águila
Mora (Geranoaetus melanoleucus) en la Patagonia sur, Argentina.
Hornero 16: 77–84.
Salvador-Jr. L.F. & Silva F.A. 2009. Rapinantes diurnos em uma
paisagem fragmentada de Mata Atlântica no alto rio Doce, Minas
Gerais, Brasil. Boletim do Museu de Biologia Mello Leitão (Nova
Série) 25: 53–65.
Sampaio I.M.G., Gusmão S.A.L., Silva F.W.A., Souza-Junior J.C. &
Jesus P.M.M. 2013. Registro da predação de Caramujo Africano,
por Gaviões Caracoleiros, em área urbana de Belém-PA. Cadernos
de Agroecologia 8: 13842.
Sanaiotti T.M. 2002. Ubicación geográca y monitoreo de los nidos
del Águila Arpía en la Amazonía brasileña. Panamá: Conferencia
Sobre Aves Rapaces Neotropicales y Simposio del Águila Arpía.
Sanaiotti T., Junqueira T., Palhares V., Aguiar-Silva F., Henriques L.,
Oliveira G., Guimarães V.Y., Castro V., Mota D., Trombin D.F.,
Villar D.N.A., Lara K.M., Fernandes D., Castilho L., Yosheno E.,
Alencar R.M., Cesca L., Dantas S.M., Laranjeiras T.O., Mathias
P.C. & Mendonça C.V. 2015. Abundance of Harpy and Crested
Eagles from a reservoir-impact area in the low- and mid-Xingu
River. Brazilian Journal of Biology 75: 190–204.
Sánchez J.E. & Sánchez-M. C. 2002. Descripción del nido y huevos del
Gavilán Barreteado (Leucopternis princeps). Panamá: Conferencia
Sobre Aves Rapaces Neotropicales y Simposio del Águila Arpía.
Sánchez-Lalinde C., Vélez-García F., Cornélio A.C., Silveira L.F. &
Alvarez M.R. 2011. Records of the Harpy Eagle (Harpia harpyja)
in the Serra Bonita reserves complex, Camacan, Bahia, with
evidence of breeding. Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia 19: 436–
438.
Sandoval L., Sánchez C., Biamonte E., Zook J.R., Sánchez J.E.,
Martínez D., Loth D. & O'Donahoe J. 2010. Recent records of
new and rare bird species in Costa Rica. Bulletin of the British
Ornithologists' Club 130: 237–245.
Santos W.M., Copatti J.F. & Rosado F.R. 2009. Nidicação de Gavião
Carijó Rupornis magnirostris (Falconiformes, Accipitridae) no
município de Peabiru (Paraná, Brasil). Revista Saúde e Biologia 4:
52–55.
Santos W.M. & Rosado F.R. 2009. Dados preliminares da biologia
do Gavião-carijó (Rupornis magnirostris, Gmelin 1788) na região
noroeste do Paraná. Revista em Agronegócios e Meio Ambiente 2:
421–430.
Sarasola J., Santillán M. & Galmes M. 2010. Crowned Eagles rarely
prey on livestock in central Argentina: persecution is not justied.
Endangered Species Research 11: 207–213.
Scheibler D.R. 2007. Food partitioning between breeding White-
tailed Kites (Elanus leucurus; Aves: Accipitridae) and Barn Owls
(Tyto alba; Aves: Tytonidae) in southern Brazil. Brazilian Journal
of Biology 67: 65–71.
Schulze M., Córdova J.L., Seavy N.E. & Whitacre D.F. 2000.
Behavior, diet, and breeding biology of Double-toothed Kites at a
Guatemalan lowland site. Condor 102: 113–126.
Seavy N.E. & Gerhardt R.P. 1998. Breeding biology and nestling diet
of the Great Black-Hawk. Journal of Raptor Research 32: 175–177.
Seavy N.E., Schulze M.D. & Whitacre D.F. 1997. Diet and hunting
behavior of the Plumbeous Kite. Wilson Bulletin 109: 526–532.
Seavy N.E., Schulze M.D., Whitacre D.F. & Vasquez M.A. 1998.
Breeding biology and behavior of Plumbeous Kites. Wilson
Bulletin 110: 77–85.
Seipke S.H. & Cabanne G.S. 2002. Rapaces observadas en un
área selvática de San Pedro, Misiones, Argentina. Ornitología
Neotropical 13: 273–282.
Seminario Y., Phillips R. & Curti M. 2011. Observations of the post-
edging behavior and prey of the Solitary Eagle (Harpyhaliaetus
solitarius). Journal of Raptor Research 45: 261–264.
Seymour A.S., Hatherley G., Contreras F.J., Aldred J. & Beeley F.
2010. Hatching synchrony, green branch collecting, and prey
use by nesting Harpy Eagles. Wilson Journal of Ornithology 122:
792–795.
Shirihai H., Díaz H.A., Huichalaf J. E. & Bretagnolle V. 2015.
Endemic breeding birds of Juan Fernández archipelago, Chile.
Dutch Birding 37: 1–20.
Sick H. 1997. Ornitologia brasileira. Rio de Janeiro: Nova Fronteira.
Sigrist T. 2006. Birds of Brazil: an artistic view. São Paulo: Avis Brasilis.
Silva F.H.A. 2007. Dieta do Gavião-Real Harpia harpyja (Aves:
Accipitridae) em orestas de terra rme de Parintins, Amazonas,
Brasil. MSc. Dissertation. Manaus: Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas
da Amazônia.
Silva J.C. & Machado C.A. 2015. Desmatamento e adaptações de aves
de rapina na área urbana de Araguaína (TO). Revista Tocantinense
de Geograa 4: 120–141.
Silva R.S. & Olmos F. 1997. Parabuteo unicinctus (Falconiformes:
Accipitridae) na Baixada Santista, litoral de São Paulo, Brasil.
Ararajuba 5: 76–79.
Silva-Rodríguez E.A., Jiménez J.E., Sepúlveda-Fuentes M.A.,
Sepúlveda M.A., Rodríguez-Jorquera I., Rivas-Fuenzalida T.,
Alvarado S.A. & Figueroa R.A. 2008. Records of the White-
throated Hawk (Buteo albigula) along the Chilean coastal forests
Ornitología Neotropical 19: 129–135.
Silveira L.F., Develey P.F., Pacheco J.F. & Whitney B.M. 2005.
Avifauna of the Serra das Lontras-Javi montane complex, Bahia,
Brazil. Cotinga 24: 45–54.
Smith D.M. & Finch D.M. 2013. Use of native and nonnative nest
plants by riparian-nesting birds along two streams in New Mexico.
Review of breeding biology of Neotropical Accipitriformes
Monsalvo et al.
181
Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia 26(2): 2018 Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia 26(2): 2018
River Research and Applications 30: 1134–1145.
Snyder N.F.R., Snyder H.A., Moore-Craig N., Flesch A.D., Wagner
R.A. & Rowlett R.A. 2010. Short-tailed Hawks nesting in the Sky
Islands of the southwest. Western Birds 41: 202–230.
Soehren E.C. 2004. A status summary of the Swallow-tailed Kite
(Elanoides forcatus) in Alabama, 1998–2003. Alabama Birdlife
50: 35–43.
Sousa G.L., Oliveira C., Procópio J., Amaral N., Brito A.S., Aguiar-
Silva F.H. & Jaudoin O. 2015. Harpy Eagle (Harpia harpyja)
monitoring project in São Geraldo do Araguaia, south-eastern
Brazilian Amazon. Spizaetus 20: 2–10.
Sousa M.C. 1999. Reprodução e hábitos alimentares de Geranoaetus
melanoleucus (Falconiformes: Accipitridae) nos Estados de Sergipe
e Alagoas, Brasil. Ararajuba 7: 135–137.
Straube F.C., Carrano E., Santos R.E.F., Scherer-Neto P., Ribas C.F.,
Meijer A.A.R., Vallejos M.A.V., Lanzer M., Klemann-Júnior
L., Aurélio-Silva M., Urben-Filho A., Arzua M., Lima A.M.X.,
Sobânia R.L.M., Deconto L.R., Bispo A.Â., Jesus S. & Abilhôa
V. 2014. Aves de Curitiba: coletânea de registros. Curitiba: Hori
Consultoria Ambiental.
Strewe R. & Navarro C. 2003. New distributional records and
conservation importance of the San Salvador Valley, Sierra Nevada
de Santa Marta, northern Colombia. Ornitología Colombiana 1:
29–41.
Strewe R., Villa-De León C., Alzate J., Beltrán J., Moya J., Navarro
C. & Utria G. 2009. Las aves del campus de la Universidad del
Magdalena, Santa Marta, Colombia. Intrópica 4: 79–91.
Suárez M.V.G., Baigorria J., Barbar F. & Padula L. 2004.
Consideraciones sobre la situación de la Harpia Harpia harpyja em
Misiones, Argentina. La Plata: Actas del Primer Simposio argentino
Sobre Investigación y Conservación de Rapaces.
Sutter J., Martinez W.E., Oliva F., Oswaldo N. & Whitacre D.F. 2001.
Diet and hunting behavior of the Crane Hawk in Tikal National
Park, Guatemala. Condor 103: 70–77.
Sykes-Jr. P.W., Kepler C.B., Litzenberger K.L., Sansing H.R., Lewis
E.T.R. & Hateld J.S. 1999. Density and habitat of breeding
Swallow-tailed Kites in the Lower Suwannee ecosystem, Florida.
Journal of Field Ornithology 70: 321–336.
iollay J. 2007. Raptor communities in French Guiana: distribution,
habitat selection, and conservation. Journal of Raptor Research 41:
90–105.
orstrom R. 1997. A description of nests and behavior of the Gray-
headed Kite. Wilson Bulletin 109: 173–177.
orstrom R. 2002a. Comments on the rst nesting record of the
nest of a Slaty-backed Forest-Falcon (Micrastur mirandollei) in the
Ecuadorian Amazon. Journal of Raptor Research 36: 335–336.
orstrom R. 2002b. Rapaces de las Indias Occidentales. Panamá:
Conferencia Sobre Aves Rapaces Neotropicales y Simposio del Águila
Arpía.
orstrom R., Almonte J. & de la Rosa S.B. 2007. Current status
and breeding biology of the Ridgway's Hawk. In: Bildstein
K.L., Barber D.R. & Zimmerman A. (eds.). Neotropical raptors.
Kempton: Hawk Mountain Sanctuary.
orstrom R., Almonte J., de la Rosa S.B., Rodríguez P. & Fernández E.
2005. Surveys and breeding biology of Buteo ridgwayi (Ridgway's
Hawk) in Los Haitises, Dominican Republic. Caribbean Journal
of Science 41: 864–869.
orstrom R. & Ki L.K. 1999. Notes on eggs of the Bicolored Hawk
Accipiter bicolor. Journal of Raptor Research 33: 244–247.
orstrom R., Massiah E. & Hall C. 2001. Nesting biology,
distribution, and population estimate of the Grenada Hook-billed
Kite Chondrohierax uncinatus mirus. Caribbean Journal of Science
37: 278–281.
orstrom R. & McQueen D. 2008. Breeding and status of the
Grenada Hook-billed Kite (Chondrohierax uncinatus mirus).
Ornitología Neotropical 19: 221–228.
orstrom R. & Quixchán A. 2000. Breeding biology and nest site
characteristics of the Bicolored Hawk in Guatemala. Wilson
Bulletin 112: 195–202.
Tizianel F.A.T. 2008. Efeito da complexidade da vegetação de
tosionomias naturais e pastagens cultivadas sobre a comunidade de
aves em duas fazendas no Pantanal da Nhecolândia, Corumbá, Mato
Grosso do Sul. MSc. Dissertation. Campo Grande: Universidade
Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul.
Tobias J.A. & Seddon N. 2007. Ornithological notes from southern
Bolivia. Bulletin of the British Ornithologists' Club 127: 293–300.
Torres R., Michelutti P., León J., Bruno G. & Cejas W. 2006. Nuevas
citas y comentarios sobre rapaces en la región central de Argentina
(provincias de Catamarca, Córdoba y Santiago del Estero).
Nuestras Aves 52: 14–16.
Trejo A., Kun M. & Seijas S. 2006b. Dieta del Águila Mora
(Geranoaetus melanoleucus) en una transecta oeste-este en el
ecotono Norpatagónico. Hornero 21: 31–36.
Trejo A., Ojeda V., Kun M. & Seijas S. 2006a. Prey of White-throated
Hawks (Buteo albigula) in the southern temperate forest of
Argentina. Journal of Field Ornithology 77: 13–17.
Trejo A., Ojeda V. & Sympson L. 2001. First nest records of the
White-throated Hawk (Buteo albigula) in Argentina. Journal of
Raptor Research 35: 169–170.
Trejo A., Ojeda V., Sympson L. & Gelain M. 2004. Breeding biology
and nest characteristics of the White-throated Hawk (Buteo
albigula) in northwestern Argentine Patagonia. Journal of Raptor
Research 38: 1–8.
Trinca C.T., Ferrari S F. & Lees A.C. 2008. Curiosity killed the
bird: arbitrary hunting of Harpy Eagles Harpia harpyja on an
agricultural frontier in southern Brazilian Amazonia. Cotinga 30:
12–15.
Troy R.J. & Stahlecker D.W. 2008. Status of a disjunct population
of Common Black-Hawks in southeastern New Mexico: 2002–
2003. NMOS Bulletin 36: 14–22.
Ubaid F.K., Ferreira L.P., Oliveira-Júnior S.B. & Antas P.T.Z. 2011.
Primeiro registro de Harpia harpyja para o bioma Pantanal, com
dados sobre atividade reprodutiva. Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia
19: 88–92.
Uribe-Hernández R., Amezcua-Allieri M.A., Oca-García M.A.M.,
Juárez-Méndez C., Eguia-Lis J.A.Z., Izquierdo M.S. & Tenorio-
Torres M.A. 2012. Índices ecológicos de avifauna y su relación
com la calidad ambiental de un pántano impactado por residuos
de petróleo. Interciencia 37: 762–768.
Urios V., Donat-Torres M.P., Bechard M. & Ferrer M. 2014.
Movements of a juvenile Crowned Eagle (Harpyhaliaetus
coronatus) tracked by satellite telemetry in central Argentina.
Journal of Biological Research-essaloniki 21: 12.
Valdez U. & Osborn S. 2002. Primeras observaciones de la ecología
del Águila Poma (Oroaetus isidori: Accipitridae) en el bosque
montano del sureste del Perú. In: Conferencia sobre aves rapaces
Neotropicales y Simposio del Águila Arpía. Panamá: Peregrine Fund.
Valdez U. & Osborn S. 2004. Observations on the ecology of the
Black-and-chestnut Eagle (Oroaetus isidori) in a montane forest of
southeastern Peru. Ornitología Neotropical 15: 31–40.
Valentine-Darby P.L., Bennetts R.E. & Kitchens W.M. 1997. Breeding
season masses of Snail Kites in Florida. Florida Field Naturalist 25:
60–63.
Valentine-Darby P.L., Bennetts R.E. & Kitchens W.M. 1998. Seasonal
patterns of habitat use by Snail Kites in Florida. Journal of Raptor
Research 32: 98–103.
Vargas H. 1995. Food habits, breeding biology, and status of the
Gray-backed Hawk (Leucopternis occidentalis) in western Ecuador
(Abstract). Boise State University eses and Dissertations #680.
http://scholarworks.boisestate.edu/td/680/ (Access on 24 October
2016).
Vargas-González J.J., Mosquera R. & Watson M. 2006a. Crested Eagle
Review of breeding biology of Neotropical Accipitriformes
Monsalvo et al.
182
Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia 26(2): 2018 Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia 26(2): 2018
(Morphnus guianensis) feeding a post-edged young Harpy Eagle
(Harpia harpyja) in Panama. Ornitología Neotropical 17: 581–584.
Vargas-González J.J. & Vargas F.H. 2011. Nesting density of Harpy
Eagles in Darien with population size estimates for Panama.
Journal of Raptor Research 45: 199–210.
Vargas-González J.J., Vargas F.H., Carpio D. & McClure C.J.W.
2014. Características de la vegetación en sitios de anidación del
Águila Arpía (Harpia harpyja) en Darién, Panamá. Ornitología
Neotropical 25: 207–218.
Vargas-González J.J., Whitacre D., Mosquera R., Albuquerque J., Piana
R., iollay J.-M., Márquez C., Sánchez J.E., Lezama-López M.,
Midence S., Matola S., Aguilar S., Rettig N.& Sanaiotti T. 2006b.
Estado y distribución actual del Águila Arpía (Harpia harpyja) en
Centro y Sur América. Ornitología Neotropical 17: 39–55.
Vargas-Masís R. & Ramírez O. 2012. Defensa territorial de Buteo
nitidus y Quiscalus mexicanus ante depredación de Falco peregrinus
en el Valle Central de Costa Rica. Zeledonia 16: 15–24.
Verea C., Solórzano A., Díaz M., Parra L., Araujo M.A., Antón F.,
Navas O., Ruiz O.J.L. & Fernández-Badillo A. 2009. Record of
breeding and molt activities in some birds of northern Venezuela.
Ornitología Neotropical 20: 181–201.
Wallace G.E., Wallace E.A.H., Froehlich D.R., Walker B., Kirkconnell
A., Torres E.S., Carlisle H.A. & Machell E. 1999. Hermit rush
and Black-throated Gray Warbler, new for Cuba, and other
signicant bird records from Cayo Coco and vicinity, Ciego de
Ávila province, Cuba, 1995–1997. Florida Field Naturalist 27:
37–51.
Walther B.A. 2003. Why canopy access is essential to understand
canopy birds: four examples from the Surumoni Crane Project.
Ornitología Neotropical 15: 41–52.
Watson R.T., McClure C.J.W., Vargas F.H. & Jenny J.P. 2016. Trial
restoration of the Harpy Eagle, a large, long-lived, tropical forest
raptor, in Panama and Belize. Journal of Raptor Research 50: 3–22.
Welch Z.C. & Kitchens W.M. 2001. Snail Kite nesting activity in the
Blue Cypress Marshes during the 2000 and 2001 breeding seasons.
Final Report. Gainesville: University of Florida.
Werner S.M. 2004. Breeding biology and habitat associations of the
Altamira Oriole and Northern Beardless-Tyrannulet in the Lower Rio
Grande Valley, Texas. MSc. Dissertation. Texas A&M University.
Wheeler B.K. 2003. Raptors of eastern North America. Princeton:
Princeton University Press.
Whitacre D.F. 2012. Neotropical birds of prey: biology and ecology of a
forest raptor community. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Whitacre D.F., Lopes-Avila J. & Lopez-Avila G. 2002. Behavioral
and physical development of a nestling Crested Eagle (Morphnus
guianensis). Journal of Raptor Research 36: 77–81.
Whitehead M.A. & Jones D. 2009. Observation of Swallow-tailed
Kite (Elanoides forcatus) post-edging parental care in Hampton
County, South Carolina. Chat 73: 5.
Whiteman N.K. & Parker P.G. 2004a. Body condition and parasite
load predict territory ownership in the Galapagos Hawk. Condor
106: 915–921.
Whiteman N.K. & Parker P.G. 2004b. Eects of host sociality on
ectoparasite population biology. Journal of Parasitology 90: 939–
947.
Williams-III S.O., Delong J.P. & Howe W.H. 2007. Northward range
expansion by the Short-tailed Hawk, with rst records for New
Mexico and Chihuahua. Western Birds 38: 2–10.
Willis E.O. & Oniki Y. 2002. Birds of Santa Teresa, Espírito Santo,
Brazil: do humans add or subtract species? Papéis Avulsos de
Zoologia 42: 193–264.
Willis E.O. & Oniki Y. 2003. Aves do estado de São Paulo. Rio Claro:
Divisa Editora.
Woolaver L.G. 2011. Ecology and conservation genetics of Ridgway's
Hawk Buteo ridgwayi. Ph.D. esis. Toronto: Canada York
University.
Woolaver L.G., Nichols R.K., Morton E. & Stutchbury B.J.M. 2013a.
Nestling sex ratio in a critically endangered dimorphic raptor,
Ridgway's Hawk (Buteo ridgwayi). Journal of Raptor Research 47:
117–126.
Woolaver L.G., Nichols R.K., Morton E.S. & Stutchbury B.J.M.
2013b. Population genetics and relatedness in a critically
endangered island raptor, Ridgway's Hawk Buteo ridgwayi.
Conservation Genetics 14: 559–571.
Woolaver L.G., Nichols R.K., Morton E.S. & Stutchbury B.J.M.
2013c. Social and genetic mating system of Ridgway's hawk
(Buteo ridgwayi), an endemic raptor on Hispaniola. Journal of
Tropical Ecology 29: 531–540.
Woolaver L.G., Nichols R.K., Morton E.S. & Stutchbury B.J.M.
2015. Breeding ecology and predictors of nest success in the
Critically Endangered Ridgway's Hawk Buteo ridgwayi. Bird
Conservation International 25: 1–14.
Zilio F. & Mendonça-Lima A. 2012. e White-Rumped Hawk
(Buteo leucorrhous) in southern Brazil: status, conservation, and
rst description of the nest. Ornitología Neotropical 23: 51–61.
Zimmerman G.M. 2004. Studies of the annual cycle of the Swallow-tailed
Kite (Elanoides forcatus): migration, habitat use, and parasites.
MSc. Dissertation. Statesboro: Georgia Southern University.
Zorzin G. 2011. Os efeitos da fragmentação da Mata Atlântica sobre a
riqueza e abundância de Accipitriformes e Falconiformes na Zona da
Mata de Minas Gerais. MSc. Dissertation. Viçosa: Universidade
Federal de Viçosa.
Zorzin G., Carvalho C.E.A. & Carvalho-Filho E.P.M. 2007. Breding
biology, diet, and distribution of the Black-chested Buzzard-eagle
(Geranoaetus m. melanoleucus) in Minas Gerais, southeastern
Brazil. In: Bildstein K.L., Barber D.R. & Zimmerman A. (eds.).
Neotropical raptors. Kempton: Hawk Mountain Sanctuary.
Zuluaga S. & Echeverry-Galvis M.A. 2016. Domestic fowl in the diet
of the Black-and-Chestnut Eagle (Spizaetus isidori) in the eastern
Andes of Colombia: a potential conict with humans. Ornitología
Neotropical 27: 113–120.
Review of breeding biology of Neotropical Accipitriformes
Monsalvo et al.
183
Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia 26(2): 2018 Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia 26(2): 2018
APPENDIX III
Results of the search for literature breeding data of two species of Accipitriformes not presented on Bierregaard-Jr.'s (1995)
review.
Sharp-shinned Hawk Accipiter striatus – the vast majority of breeding records of the so-called “Central and South
American group” of subspecies (sensu Ferguson-Lees & Christie 2001) refer to A. s. erythronemius, whose breeding traits were
classied as entirely unknown by Bierregaard-Jr. (1995; but see comments by Di Giacomo 2005). Dierent populations
of this subspecies' range were studied in detail, but most other breeding reports are anecdotal. Central American A. s.
chionogaster (also labeled as having unknown breeding biology by 1995) now at least had one of its populations studied
in detail. Finally, the Andean form A. s. ventralis have no new breeding data; its nest remains undescribed, and knowledge
on breeding behavior is based solely on older scattered information (Bierregaard-Jr. 1995).
Located references:
Arballo E. & Cravino J.L. 1999. Aves del Uruguay: manual ornitológico,
v. 1. Montevideo: Editorial Hemisferio Sur.
Bodrati A., Cockle K., Segovia J.M., Roesler I., Areta J.I. & Jordan
E. 2010. La avifauna del Parque Provincial Cruce Caballero,
provincia de Misiones, Argentina. Cotinga 32: 41–64.
Carvalho C.E.A., Carvalho-Filho E.P.M. & Carvalho G.D.M. 2002.
Descripción de nidos, huevos, pichones y aspectos de la biologia
reproductiva del Gavilan Muslirrufo (Acciptier(sic) erythronemius)
en el Sureste de Brasil. Panamá: Conferencia Sobre Aves Rapaces
Neotropicales y Simposio del Águila Arpía.
Carvalho-Filho E.P.M., Carvalho G.D.M. & Carvalho C.E.A. 2005.
Observations of nesting Gray-Headed Kites (Leptodon cayanensis)
in southeastern Brazil. Journal of Raptor Research 39: 89–92.
Carvalho-Filho E.P.M., Zorzin G., Canuto M., Carvalho C.E.A.
& Carvalho G.D.M. 2008. Aves de rapina diurnas do Parque
Estadual do Rio Doce, Minas Gerais, Brasil. MG Biota 1: 4–43.
Chatellenaz M.L. 2005. Aves del Valle del Río Paraná en la provincia
del Chaco, Argentina: riqueza, historia natural y conservación.
INSUGEO 14: 527–550.
Di Giacomo A.G. 2005. Aves de la Reserva El Bagual, p. 201–465.
In: Di Giacomo A.G. & Krapovickas S.F. (eds.). Historia natural
y paisaje de la Reserva El Bagual, provincia de Formosa, Argentina:
inventario de la fauna de vertebrados y de la flora vascular de un área
protegida del chaco húmedo. Buenos Aires: Asociación Ornitológica
del Plata.
Jenner T. 2008. Accipiter chionogaster. Aratinga 2: 4–5.
Jenner T. 2010. Life history of the White-Breasted Hawk (Accipiter
chionogaster). Ornitología Neotropical 21: 157–180.
Menq W. 2014. Comportamento de perseguição intra e interespecíca
de Gavião-miúdo (Accipiter striatus) em um parque urbano de
Maringá, Paraná. Atualidades Ornitológicas 179: 9–11.
Monsalvo J.A.B. 2012. Reprodução de Buteo brachyurus em um parque
urbano de São Paulo, sudeste do Brasil. Atualidades Ornitológicas
170: 33–40.
Santos K.K. 2014. Aves da RPPN Alto-Montana. Itamonte: Instituto
Alto-Montana da Serra Fina.
Seipke S.H. & Cabanne G.S. 2002. Rapaces observadas en un
área selvática de San Pedro, Misiones, Argentina. Ornitología
Neotropical 13: 273–282.
Seipke S.H. & Cabanne G.S. 2008. Breeding of the Rufous-
ighed Hawk (Accipiter erythronemius) in Argentina and Brazil.
Ornitología Neotropical 19: 15–29.
Willis E.O. & Oniki Y. 2002. Birds of Santa Teresa, Espírito Santo,
Brazil: do humans add or subtract species? Papéis Avulsos de
Zoologia 42: 193–264.
Willis E.O. & Oniki Y. 2003. Aves do estado de São Paulo. Rio Claro:
Divisa Editora.
Cuban Black Hawk Buteogallus gundlachii – apparently there is still little breeding data, as we located very few reports,
and just two of these studies provide more detailed descriptions of breeding events.
Located references:
Ferrer-Sánchez Y. 2015. Variables que inuyen em la distribución y
abundancia de rapaces diurnas y em la ubicación de sus sitios de
anidación em Cuba. Ph.D. esis. La Paz: Centro de Investigaciones
Biológicas del Noroeste.
Ferrer-Sánchez Y. & Rodríguez-Estrella R. 2016. How rare species
conservation management can be strengthened with the use of
ecological niche modelling: the case for endangered endemic
Gundlach's Hawk and Cuban Black-Hawk. Global Ecology and
Conservation 5: 88–99.
García-Quintas A. & Ávila D.D. 2012. Un ejemplo teórico de
modelación del hábitat y la distribución potencial por análisis
factorial del nicho ecológico. Mesoamericana 16: 12–21.
Wiley J.W. & Garrido O.H. 2005. Taxonomic status and biology of
the Cuban Black-Hawk, Buteogallus anthracinus gundlachii (Aves:
Accipitridae). Journal of Raptor Research 39: 351–364.
Review of breeding biology of Neotropical Accipitriformes
Monsalvo et al.
184
Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia 26(2): 2018 Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia 26(2): 2018
APPENDIX IV
Literature references with breeding data of Neotropical Accipitriformes, produced between 1995‒2016, but not retrieved
in this review.
Altamirano T.A., Ibarra J.T., Hernandez-Rojas I., Laker J. & Bonacic
C. 2012. [Nesting habits of the birds of the Andean temperate forests
of Chile]. Santiago: Fondo de Proteccion Ambiental.
Alvarado S.A. & Figueroa R.A. 2006b. Function of reverse sexual
dimorphism in the reproductive behavior and parental care of
the Chilean Hawk (Accipiter chilensis), in the Nevados de Chillan
biological corridor, Chile. In: Valparaiso: VIII Jornadas de Etologia
de la Universidad de Playa Ancha.
Anderson D.L. 1999. Tawahka Project, Honduras: 1999 eld season
report. Boise: e Peregrine Fund.
Couve E. & Vidal C.F. 2004. Birds of Torres Paine National Park,
Patagonia, Chile. Puntarenas: Editorial Fantastico Sur.
Donaghy Cannon M. 2001. Breeding ecology of cooperatively
polyandrous Galapagos Hawks (Buteo galapagoensis) on Santiago
Island, Galapagos. MSc. Dissertation. Jonesboro: Arkansas State
University.
Figueroa R.A., Corales S.S. & Lopez R.R. 2001. Records of the
White-throated Hawk (Buteo albigula) and notes on its hunting
methods and movements in the Andes of central-southern Chile.
International Hawkwatcher 4: 3–9.
Giudice R. 2006. Tree architecture as a determinant factor in the nest
tree selection of Harpy Eagles (Harpia harpyja). In: Iguazu: II
Neotropical Raptor Conference.
Jones H.L. 2003. Central America. North American Birds 57: 414–
416.
Jones HL. 2004. Central America. North American Birds 58: 290–292
Jones H.L. & Komar O. 2008b. Central America. North American
Birds 61: 648–651.
Levenstein K. 2008. Reproductive ecology of the cooperatively polyandrous
Galapagos Hawk on Santiago Island, Galapagos. Ph.D. esis.
Jonesboro: Arkansas State University.
Lobos R.P. & Alvarado O.S. 2006. Mutualism between the Crowned
Solitary Eagle (Harpyhaliaetus coronatus) and the Monk Parakeet
(Myiopsitta monacha) during nest building in the Telteca Natural
Forest Reserve, Department of Lavalle, Mendoza province,
Argentina. Valparaiso: VIII Jornadas de Etologia de la Universidad
de Playa Ancha.
Meyer K.D. & Arnett J.E. 1996. Age-class distinctions and delayed
reproduction of American Swallow-tailed Kites in Florida. Boise:
Abstracts of the 114th Stated Meeting of the American Ornithologists'
Union and the 1996 Annual Meeting of the Raptor Research
Foundation.
Meyer K.D., Duvall D.J. & Arnett J.E. 1995. Depressed success of
American Swallow-tailed Kites (Elanoides forcatus) nesting in
introduced Australian Pines (Casuarina spp.). Duluth: Abstracts of
the Raptor Research Foundation 1995 Annual Meeting.
Olveira L. 2001. Rufous-thighed Hawk (Accipiter erythronemius) in
Mar del Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina. Nuestras Aves 17: 34.
Pineda L., Navas E.M. & Fernandez R.A. 2016. New location for
and rst record of nesting Pearl Kite (Gampsonyx swainsoni) in El
Salvador. Spizaetus 22: 6–13.
Sánchez T. 2000. [Behavior of the Galapagos Hawk (Buteo
galapagoensis) during the incubation period and morphological
variation between populations at Espanola, Santa Fe, Isabela and
Antiago(sic) Islands, Galapagos, Ecuador]. Undergraduate esis.
Quito: Ponticia Universidad Católica del Ecuador.
Tuño P. 2007. Cunsi Pindo: conservation of the Harpy Eagle in Ecuador.
Quito: SIMBIOE.
Woods R.W. & Woods A. 1997. Atlas of breeding birds of the Falkland
Islands. Shropshire: Anthony Nelson.
Review of breeding biology of Neotropical Accipitriformes
Monsalvo et al.
185
Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia 26(2): 2018 Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia 26(2): 2018
APPENDIX V
Results of the search for photographic breeding records of Neotropical Accipitriformes on the WikiAves database.
Species Records' reference numbers
Elanus leucurus WA1251178; WA1253853; WA1263279; WA1272398; WA1272409;
WA1279861; WA1281964; WA1288071; WA1290781; WA1293418;
WA1300395; WA1376684; WA1499798; WA1720428; WA1721934;
WA1770437; WA1835635; WA1835637; WA1837761; WA1841067;
WA1904171; WA2037143; WA2071064; WA2090188; WA21325; WA21537;
WA2271383; WA250965; WA466357; WA661980; WA698506; WA719423;
WA729366; WA732823; WA915133; WA915840; WA915852; WA936035.
Chondrohierax uncinatus WA1160532; WA1688095; WA1937776; WA1968066; WA1981003.
Leptodon cayanensis WA723947; WA723948.
Leptodon forbesi WA938449.
Spizaetus melanoleucus WA1140737; WA1140739; WA1370302; WA1378059; WA1438023;
WA195643; WA2206395; WA2242350; WA2249207; WA2322423.
Rostrhamus sociabilis WA1214147; WA1218422; WA1280372; WA147627; WA1493450;
WA1588325; WA1771055; WA2021254; WA2021256; WA2108507;
WA226747; WA24193; WA36753; WA474247; WA484024; WA64884;
WA696195; WA696196; WA81214; WA819399.
Helicolestes hamatus WA1589021; WA1966794; WA953944.
Harpagus bidentatus WA2198552; WA2240795; WA668871.
Harpagus diodon WA1156861; WA1200479; WA1228366; WA123732; WA1237599; WA14961;
WA14962; WA1966820; WA1966889; WA206624; WA209513; WA219297;
WA219978; WA222095; WA222762; WA244381; WA250110; WA251551;
WA252886; WA255778; WA255779; WA255914; WA257012; WA275906;
WA280598; WA507006; WA73820; WA76435; WA76436; WA76815;
WA785304; WA819506; WA82627; WA860802; WA861618; WA884512;
WA887671; WA887710; WA889684; WA897892; WA900167; WA98349.
Accipiter poliogaster WA1920902; WA1985763; WA1989199; WA1992309; WA1994808;
WA2005934; WA2034929; WA2047459; WA2132296; WA2319849;
WA779787.
Accipiter bicolor WA106136; WA1744297; WA89938.
Geranospiza caerulescens WA140630; WA141005; WA1444043; WA1565980; WA1649149.
Buteogallus anthracinus WA950092.
Buteogallus aequinoctialis WA1503515.
Pseudastur polionotus WA1570081; WA1570097; WA1581106.
Pseudastur albicollis WA215803; WA722126.
Buteo nitidus WA1184610; WA1392108; WA2187978; WA2187993; WA388429;
WA476978; WA506191.
Buteo brachyurus WA1116480; WA1356894; WA1356902; WA176090; WA176091;
WA2033914; WA225567; WA33877; WA513759; WA513770; WA513777;
WA513781; WA513790; WA513819; WA513828; WA819112; WA819113.
Review of breeding biology of Neotropical Accipitriformes
Monsalvo et al.
186
Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia 26(2): 2018
APPENDIX VI
Proposed corrections to four misidentied museum egg sets of Neotropical Accipitriformes. Arguments referring to
geographical distribution are not presented since all species involved are sympatric at these collection localities (del Hoyo
et al. 2016).
Set WFVZ 15561 - formerly assigned to Lined Forest-Falcon Micrastur gilvicollis. Seemingly, no information exists on
Lined Forest-Falcon's eggs (Bierregaard-Jr. 1995, GRIN 2009, del Hoyo et al. 2016). is one-egg set was obtained by G.
D. Smooker, whose identications have already been questioned (orstrom & Ki 1999). More importantly, the egg is
much larger than those of another similar-sized, closely-related Micrastur falcon (Whitacre 2012). us, we doubt it could
be properly atributed to Lined Forest-Falcon.
Measurements, clutch-size and overall appearance are suitable with known clutches of the Gray-headed Kite measured by
us and to other data presented by Whitacre (2012). us, it almost certainly belongs to this species.
We recommend the treatment of this set as cfr. Leptodon cayanensis.
Set WFVZ 15951 - previously assigned to Black-collared Hawk Busarellus nigricollis. Also from Smooker's collection.
Measurements of theses two eggs are much smaller than Black-collared Hawk's eggs (GRIN 2010), but consistent with
those of Zone-tailed Hawk Buteo albonotatus (del Hoyo et al. 2016), as suggested by L. Ki on the data slip of this set. Yet,
contrary to the previous and next cases, these species overall appearances and “eld jizzes” are quite dierent (J.A.B.M.,
pers. obs.) to justify such a misidentication by the collector. Also, dimensions, clutch-size and general appearance of the
eggs did not allow a rigorous identication. We do not discard that the clutch refers to Zone-tailed Hawk, but evidence is
not conclusive as they may refer to other hawks as well.
We recommend that this set should not be treated as Busarellus nigricollis, and tentatively identify as cfr. Buteo albonotatus.
Sets WFVZ 16312 and 16313 - both formerly assigned to Hook-billed Kite Chondrohierax uncinatus.
ese three eggs are very distinct from, and much larger than, Hook-billed Kite's (J.A.B.M., pers. obs., Di Giácomo
2000, Whitacre 2012). Both dimensions, clutch-sizes and overall appearance ts with Gray-headed Kite's clutches. Albeit
measurements of the two-egg clutch (WFVZ 16312) are slightly smaller than most Gray-headed Kite's, they t with those
of another two egg-clutch of this species, provided by Carvalho-Filho et al. (2005).
We assign these sets to Leptodon cayanensis.
References:
Bierregaard-Jr. R.O. 1995. e biology and conservation status of
Central and South American Falconiformes: a survey of current
knowledge. Bird Conservation International 5: 325–340.
Carvalho-Filho E.P.M., Carvalho G.D.M. & Carvalho C.E.A. 2005.
Observations of nesting Gray-Headed Kites (Leptodon cayanensis)
in southeastern Brazil. Journal of Raptor Research 39: 89–92.
del Hoyo J., Elliott A., Sargatal J., Christie D.A. & de Juana E. 2016.
Handbook of the birds of the world alive. http://www.hbw.com
(Access on 24 October 2016).
Di Giacomo A.G. 2000. Nidicación de algunas rapaces poco
conocidas en el Chaco oriental argentino. Hornero 15: 135–139.
GRIN (Global Raptor Information Network). 2009. Species account:
Lined Forest Falcon Micrastur gilvicollis. http://www.globalraptors.
org/grin/SpeciesResults.asp?specID=8062 (Access on 24 October
2016).
GRIN (Global Raptor Information Network). 2010. Additional details
on Breeding. Busarellus nigricollis. http://www.globalraptors.org/
grin/SpeciesExtended.asp?specID=8010&catID=2006 (Access on
24 October 2016).
orstrom R. & Ki L. F. 1999. Notes on eggs of the Bicolored Hawk
Accipiter bicolor. Journal of Raptor Research 33: 244–247.
Whitacre D.F. 2012. Neotropical birds of prey: biology and ecology of a
forest raptor community. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
... Information about clutch sizes and the duration of incubation and nestling periods are available for only about 20% of the species, with about 43% lacking any information (Xiao et al. 2017). Nests remain undescribed in the literature for many species in most taxonomic groups (Greeney et al. 2008, Heming and Greeney 2013, Monsalvo et al. 2018 and for some of the most diverse Neotropical regions such as the Amazonian lowlands (Melo and Greeney 2019). Furthermore, few species have been thoroughly studied and data concerning life history traits are insufficiently sampled, even for abundant species with broad geographic ranges (e.g., New World flycatchers; Heming et al. 2013). ...
... La informaci on sobre el tamaño de las nidadas y la duraci on de los per ıodos de incubaci on y cr ıa solo est a disponible para aproximadamente 20% de las especies, y cerca de 43% carece de informaci on (Xiao et al. 2017). Los nidos siguen sin describirse en la literatura para muchas especies en la mayor ıa de grupos taxon omicos (Greeney et al. 2008, Heming et al. 2013, Monsalvo et al. 2018, y para algunas de las regiones neotropicales m as diversas, como son Neotropical Breeding Biology Data Collection Guide Vol. 0, No. 0 las tierras bajas del Amazonas (Melo y Greeney 2019). ...
Article
Full-text available
en The study of avian nesting biology in North America and Europe has a long history, resulting in an expansive and information-rich literature. In contrast, the tropics have been relatively neglected and, in most ways, we are still at the frontier of exploration. Data about basic nest descriptions and natural history information are still lacking for many Neotropical species; standardization of data collection methods is needed for comparative analyses. Hence, our goals are: (1) motivate a new generation of Neotropical naturalists to collect nesting data by providing basic tips on how to find nests and collect basic data, (2) provide guidelines on how to use and analyze basic data, (3) highlight the importance of collections, (4) describe modern monitoring techniques, and (5) suggest how these data can be used to fill important gaps concerning the breeding biology of tropical birds. Understanding avian nesting biology and the biotic and abiotic factors that influence nesting success is crucial for a better understanding of bird population dynamics and breeding strategies at the community level, and can form the basis for the development of sound conservation measures. Resumen es Guía estandarizada de métodos para la colección de datos sobre biología reproductiva en aves Neotropicales (see Appendix 1 for a Spanish-language version of the entire article). El estudio de la biología de anidación de aves en América del Norte y Europa tiene una larga historia, lo que ha resultado en una literatura extensa y rica en información. Por el contrario, los trópicos han sido relativamente poco estudiados y, en la mayoría de los casos, todavía estamos en la frontera de la exploración. Todavía faltan datos sobre descripciones básicas de nidos e información de historia natural para muchas especies neotropicales, además necesitamos estandarizar las metodologías y recolección de datos para los análisis comparativos. Por lo tanto, nuestros objetivos son: (1) motivar a una nueva generación de naturalistas neotropicales a recopilar datos de anidación proporcionando consejos básicos sobre cómo encontrar nidos y colectar datos básicos, (2) proporcionar pautas sobre cómo usar y analizar datos básicos, (3) resaltar la importancia de las colecciones biológicas, (4) describir las técnicas modernas de monitoreo, y (5) sugerir cómo se pueden utilizar estos datos para llenar vacíos importantes en la biología reproductiva de las aves tropicales. Comprender la biología reproductiva de las aves y los factores bióticos y abióticos que influencian el éxito de la anidación es crucial para comprender mejor la dinámica de las poblaciones de aves, las estrategias de reproducción a nivel de comunidad y puede formar la base para el desarrollo de medidas de conservación sólidas.
... Even though breeding traits of diurnal raptors can be relevant for management and monitoring efforts (Krüger and Radford 2008;Lambertucci et al. 2014;Monsalvo et al. 2018), such topics have been neglected in the recent literature, as Monsalvo et al. (2020) pointed out. For instance, key references on these birds (eg Ferguson-Lees and Christie 2001;Wheeler 2003;Campbell 2015) tend to ignore information on eggs, other than presenting concise clutch-size data. ...
Article
The Rufous Crab Hawk (Buteogallus aequinoctialis) is a crab-eating specialist restricted to South American mangroves. Even though it is considered Near Threatened, with presumed population declines, its breeding biology remains poorly studied. Here we combined a comprehensive review of literature, museum and citizen science data to address its breeding biology, gaps in our knowledge, and conservation implications. The species lays one egg on a large stick nest placed on mangrove trees 6 to 11 m above the ground. The ovoid eggs averaged 57.5 × 44.0 mm in size (n = 25), overlapping partially with B. anthracinus and B. gundlachii eggs. The breeding period differs among regions, starting earlier in the northern parts of the distribution and progressively later in the southern ones. This review also shows that the species nests only in mangrove trees, a vegetation type under threat, and that breeding records are unevenly distributed across its range. Very little has been published on the reproduction of the Rufous Crab Hawk in the last 50 years, and we still lack proper information on most aspects of its breeding biology. Our review shows that we can improve our understanding of a species’ reproduction by using multiple sources of previously available data and therefore provide a better basis to assist in conservation measures.
... Despite its rich avifauna, Brazil has a weak tradition of studying bird reproductive biology and life history (Heming et al., 2013). Thus, there are still gaps in our knowledge about bird breeding (Monsalvo et al., 2018), as is usual for a tropical country (Xiao et al., 2017). ...
Article
Full-text available
Egg collections have been poorly studied and cataloged both in Brazil and overseas. In Brazil, there is a lack of both historical and current tradition of establishing and curating egg collections. This paper provides information about the size of collections, collecting dates, major collectors, geographic locations, and institutions holding egg sets of Brazilian birds. Through this effort, we recovered part of the history of Brazilian ornithology and provide general directions for those interested in studying egg sets deposited in scientific collections. We retrieved information from 5,888 egg sets collected in Brazil between 1818-2022, currently deposited at 45 institutions/museums. The four largest egg collections in Brazil are at MZUSP, MN, COMB and MPEG. However, around half of the egg sets are deposited in institutions from Europe (mainly at MLUH and ZMB in Germany, NMW in Austria, NHM in the UK, and CRRM in Romania) and the USA (mainly at the WFVZ). Most egg sets were collected between the 1890s and 1930s, and after 2010. In Brazil, 70% of the egg sets were collected in five Brazilian states (MG, SP, SC, PA, and RS). Overall, egg collecting was uneven in space and time. We traced ~330 egg collectors, but most egg sets were collected by José Caetano Guimarães Sobrinho, while Caio Guimarães Chagas was probably the greatest collection owner in Brazil. A recent increase in egg collecting shows a renewed interest in assembling this type of bird vouchers. A scientifically sustained, planned and ethical collection of eggs should continue in Brazil since the breeding biology of many species is still poorly known, and since egg sets are important to provide data for new studies on the ecology, evolution, and conservation of Brazilian birds.