ArticlePDF Available

The Theatre of Chaeronea and Rectilinear Koila

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

The theatre of Chaeronea, in Boeotia, has always been of great interest due to the rectilinear plan of its early structure. Excavations carried out in 2009 have enabled us to observe previously undiscovered phases of construction and parts of the building. Thanks to these surveys, we can now discuss the monument’s creation and architectural evolution, concentrating on the redefinition of the theatre’s koilon. This article aims to re-examine the structures of the theatre of Chaeronea, starting with an examination of some of the most interesting rectilinear koila in Greece. In recent years, excavations in continental Greek have led to a revival of the endless debate on rectilinear plans and on the relationships between fifth-century theatres exhibiting plans with rectilinear staircases. Following the canonisation of the semi-circular plan, did all theatres suddenly take up the new model? When did the theatre of Chaeronea abandon its rectilinear shape to imitate the semi-circular theatres of the fourth century BC? Can we really imagine an immediate and sudden upsetting of theatre plans without considering the spread and reception times of the new model? How much did local needs and specificities influence the redefinition of old theatres? The following paper does not necessarily aim to answer all of these questions, but draws attention to certain issues arising from the Chaeronea theatre case. The small Boeotia town experienced its greatest economic and demographic development starting in the late first century BC. Evidently, however, consistent with a regional situation that was particularly active1 in theatre construction, it had already built its small theatre in the fifth century BC, despite its small size.
Content may be subject to copyright.
The Theatre of Chaeronea and Rectilinear Koila
Marco Germani
The theatre of Chaeronea, in Boeotia, has always been of great interest
due to the rectilinear plan of its early structure. Excavations carried
out in 2009 have enabled us to observe previously undiscovered phases
of construction and parts of the building. Thanks to these surveys, we
can now discuss the monument’s creation and architectural evolution,
concentrating on the redefinition of the theatre’s koilon. This article aims
to re-examine the structures of the theatre of Chaeronea, starting with an
examination of some of the most interesting rectilinear koila in Greece.
Inrecent years, excavations in continental Greek have led to a revival of the
endless debate on rectilinear plans and on the relationships between fifth-
century theatres exhibiting plans with rectilinear staircases. Following the
canonisation of the semi-circular plan, did all theatres suddenly take up
the new model? When did the theatre of Chaeronea abandon its rectilinear
shape to imitate the semi-circular theatres of the fourth century BC? Can
we really imagine an immediate and sudden upsetting of theatre plans
without considering the spread and reception times of the new model?
How much did local needs and specificities influence the redefinition of
old theatres? The following paper does not necessarily aim to answer all
of these questions, but draws attention to certain issues arising from the
Chaeronea theatre case. The small Boeotia town experienced its greatest
economic and demographic development starting in the late first century
BC. Evidently, however, consistent with a regional situation that was
particularly active1 in theatre construction, it had already built its small
theatre in the fifth century BC, despite its small size.
“There is no incontrovertible evidence for an orchestra circle before
the theater at Epidauros was built at the end of the fourth century BC”,
concluded Gebhard2 in a long 1974 article on orchestra shapes in the most
ancient Greek theatres. Her research came after a long series of studies on
rectilinear plan theatres and was trailed by many other articles searching
for common aspects that could be potentially attributable to a widespread
1 Germani M. Boiotian theatres: an overview of the regional architecture, in Rune
Frederiksen, Elizabeth R. Gebhard and Alexander Sokolicek (edd.), The Architecture
of the Ancient Greek Theatre, Acts of an International Conference at the Danish
Institute at Athens, 27–30 January 2012, Athens 2015.– PP. 351–365.
2 Gebhard E. The form of the orchestra in the Early Greek theatre, in Hesperia, 1974,
43.– P. 440.
98 Marco Germani
model in the fifth century BC. More recently, Moretti, starting from the the-
atre of Dionysus on the slopes of the Athenian acropolis, took the opportu-
nity to revisit and update the status quaestionis on theatres with rectilinear
koila in Greece. Numerous hypotheses have been developed on the origin
and spread of the rectilinear shape, and just as many theories on the transi-
tion to semi-circular koilon have been expressed1. What is widely accepted,
however, is that, starting in the second half of the fourth century BC with
the canonization of the semi-circular form, all theatres tended to adopt this
plan, immediately supplanting the rectilinear staircases in use up to that
point. The existence of rectilinear staircases after the fifth century BC has
always been refused by a greater number of scholars who indicate that the
transition to the semi-circular plan was in the fourth century2. In reality, as
shown by studies on the theatre of Makyneia, architects in small provincial
cities often used solutions more suited to the morphological characteris-
tics of the landscape, to available resources and to the needs of the city3.
The theatre of Isthmia4 also seems datable to about 400 BC, the start of the
fourth century BC. We might say the same for the theatre of Eretria, where
the studies by Fiechter5 now appear to displaced by Isler, who dates the rec-
tilinear structure to the mid-fourth century6. This debate, still heated and
animated, highlights how much we have yet to understand when it comes
to theatres. The constant restoration and renovation performed on the the-
atres over the centuries cancels out the original image of these structures.
The result, in a way, is a loss of data we might have used to establish and
refer to aspects shared by these early theatres. The archaeological evidences
examined to date seem to start from a common feature: all of these the-
atres were built directly into rocky slopes7. Another feature seems to be
1 Paga J. The Greek Theatre, in Margaret M. Miles (ed.), A Companion to Greek
Architecture, Chichester, West Sussex.– P. 371.
2 On this subject, also see Paga J. Deme Theaters in Attica and the Trittys System,
in Hesperia, 2010, 79.– PP. 351–371.
3 Stiros S., Psimoulis P.A., Kolonas Ch.L. The Theatre of Aitolian Makyneia, in
Annual of the British School at Athens, 2005(2006), 100.– P. 312.
4 Gebhard E. The theatre at Isthmia, Chicago and London 1973. – PP. 9–26;
Moretti J.C. Lesentrées en scène dansle théâtre grec: l’apport de l’archéologie, in
Pallas,1992.– PP. 84–87.
5 Fiechter E.R. Das Theater in Eretria, Stuttgart 1937.
6 Isler H.P. Eretria, in P. Ciancio Rossetto, G. Pisani Sartorio (acura di), Teatri greci e
romani alle origini del linguaggio rappresentato. Censimento analitico, Roma 1994.–
PP.215–216; Isler H.P. Das Theater: Grabungen 1997 und 1998, in Eretria XVIII,
Gollion 2007.
7 Moretti J.C. Le théâtre du sanctuaire de Dionysos Éleuthéreus à Athènes, au Ve s. av.
J.-C., in REG, 113, 2000.– Р. 283.
The Theatre of Chaeronea and Rectilinear Koila 99
the absence of a stable scenic structure (skene)1. A rectilinear shaped and
rather small koilon is a recurring element in the theatres of Greece and
Sicily in the fifth and early fourth century. During the fourth century, with
the start of the Hellenistic age and an increased importance of the theatre
in Greek society, these koila began to have larger dimensions2. Anti and
Polacco
3
previously believed theatre of Chaeronea (fig. 1) to be a small the-
atre with 8/12 rectilinear steps. Recent surveys performed on the structure
reveal that its early form likely had at least ten rows of steps of which we
have traces in loco
4
, followed by a unknown number of other steps which
vanished with the construction work for the cavea’s curvature. A more ex-
act dating of this structure comes not only from a comparison with other
rectilinear plan theatres, but also from an inscription seen and recorded
first, mistakenly, by Frazer5 and later, correctly, by the two Italian schol-
ars
6
. It now seems rather improbable to trace the inscription recorded in
the IG7 to the wall of the katatomé A3 (v. fig. 2):
[– – –]μεσ[– –]
Ε̣ὐ[ϝ]άνδρας.
1 The theatre of Isthmia is an exception, where we seem to have the remains of a
scenic structure. Gebhard E. The theatre at Isthmia, Chicago and London 1973.–
PP.9–26.
2 Paga J. Deme Theaters in Attica and the Trittys System, in Hesperia, 2010, 79.–
Р. 367.
3 Mentions of the theatre are also found in a work by Ginouvès. However, he states
in a note that his considerations on the theatre are the result of reading the work
by Anti and Polacco, (Ginouvès R. Le théâtron à gradins droits de l’odéon d’Argos,
Paris, 1972.– PP. 62–63). To be mentioned, also: Arias P.E. Il teatro Greco fuori di
Atene, Firenze 1934.– PP. 64–66; Dilke O.A.W. The greek theatre cavea, in BSA 43,
London 1948.– PP.125–192.
4 Anti and Polacco detected only 8 steps, while a fresh autoptic examination of the
structure found the remnants of at least 10 steps, under which other staircases,
which disappeared following the curvature of the koilon, could be identified.
5 This inscription, IG 3459, was mistaken by Frazer with IG 3407, causing numerous
problems in archaeological literature in the following years. It held, on the basis
of the dedication contained in IG VII 3407, that the theatre could have been
dedicated to Apollo and Artemis. Frazer J.G. Frazer, Pausanias’s Description of
Greece, V. London, 1898.– PP. 205–208; The transcription error is still evident
in: Kountouri E. Ανασκαφικές εργασίες στην Χαιρώνεια 2000–2002, Πρώτες
εκτιμήσεις, in A. Mazarakis Ainian (ed.), Αρχαιολογικό έργο Θεσσαλίας και
Στερεάς Ελλάδας (1: 2003: Βόλος, Greece), Βόλος 2006.– P. 781; Sear F. Roman
Theatres. An Architectural Study, Oxford 2006.– P. 392.
6 Anti C., Polacco L. Nuove ricerche sui teatri greci arcaici, Padova 1969.– P. 25.
7 IG VII 3459.
100 Marco Germani
This evidence was examined rather hastily by Anti and Polacco. The two
archaeologists reported seeing it carved in the centre of the katatomè K3
(fig. 2). The epigraphic text, despite its insignificant content, is interesting
for the presence of ϝ”. As noted by Buck1, the “ϝ” in an intervocalic posi-
tion is attested in Boeotia only until the first half of the fourth century BC,
at most. This dating provides us with an excellent chronological marker to
reconstruct the steps related to the curvature of the cavea. The text was
certainly engraved on a rectilinear wall of the koilon. The redefinition of
the cavea, according to Anti and Polacco, was completed at the turn of the
fourth and third century, therefore, at least, 50 years after the “ϝ is sup-
1 Buck C.D. The Greek dialects. – Boston, 1910. – PP. 48–49; id. Buck C.D.
Introduction to the study of the Greek dialects: grammar, selected inscriptions,
glossary.– Boston, 1928.– PP. 196.
Fig. 1. Chaironeia, theatre
The Theatre of Chaeronea and Rectilinear Koila 101
posed to have disappeared. So, it would seem rather unlikely to find a text
that paleographically dates back to the first half of the fourth century BC,
at most, on a (curved) reworked wall at the end of the fourth century BC,
like the katatomè K3. The only point where this katatomè coincides with
the ancient step, and where its surface could have remained unchanged,
is a very small area, somewhat high compared to the step’s level, located
almost at the centre of this wall. Autoptic analysis carried out in oblique
light, however, did not reveal any traces. In addition to the problem of the
inscription, the theatre of Chaeronea seems to have another problem: the
height of the orchestra in the early rectilinear-plan theatre. If we accept
the idea that this early structure was designed with few steps, as shown in
the plan prepared by Gismondi in 1969, we understand that the original
plan for the orchestra must have been at a higher level than the orchestra
of the curvilinear theatre. So, to create the curvilinear theatre, the koilon
would have been expanded, which would have involved excavation works
to the original plan and a lowering to create more steps, which then be-
came part of the ima cavea. It seems more likely, then, that the original
rectilinear staircase took up the same height that was covered by the cur-
vilinear theatre1. This is confirmed by observable details in the shape of
1 Anti and Polacco themselves, considering the possibility of a theatre with only the
8 rectilinear steps they found, admitted to having problems with this hypothesis,
due to the absence in situ of containment and substructure works on the orchestra
level which were found about 7 metres above the current one. Thisiswhy they
Fig.2. Chaironeia, theatre plan, Gismondi 1969 (AntiPolacco 1969)
102 Marco Germani
some of the steps in the ima cavea, as well as by surveys conducted in 2009
(fig. 3). This new theatre, equipped with two side wings on the embank-
ment, continued to function until at least the mid-fourth century AD1, as
evidenced by coins found in recent excavations2. The continuity of this
structure is also attested by an inscription3, dated to the third centuryBC,
suggested a series of about 4 steps to be placed under a katatomékr1 (Gismondi
1969 plan). This katatomè separated the rectilinear staircase, made up of the
8 steps they detected, from a lower set of steps (perhaps 4) used to reach the
current orchestra level.
1 The throne held in the church of Kimisi Theotokou in the modern village of
Chaeronea, dated to the mid-fourth century AD, would suggest a very long
lifespan for this structure, if its provenience from the proedria of the theatre
were confirmed. Germani M. Troni e sedili della Beozia con decorazioni vegetali, in
R. Di Cesare, F. Longo, S. Privitera (acura di), Dromoi, Studi sul mondo antico oerti
a Emanuele Greco dai suoi allievi della Scuola Archeologica Italiana di Atene, Salerno
2016.– PP. 231–241.
2 These are, in fact, two coins datable to the rule of Constantius II; while the first
is a Centenionalis with an egy of Constantius on the front and a soldier killing
scene on the back (RIC352; Cohen H., Description historiques des monnaies frappée
sous l’Empire Romain, Paris, 1880–82.– P. 46), the second, not as well preserved,
seems to refer to the Maiorina type, with the diademed head of the emperor on the
front and a knight killing a barbarian on the back (RIC VIII #195).
3 IG VII 3409.
Fig. 3. Chaironeia, theatre plan, Germani 2012
The Theatre of Chaeronea and Rectilinear Koila 103
which references construction work for a proskenion. This information is
interesting because it attests that the theatre was in use and that perfor-
mances were regularly held in it in the third century BC. Unfortunately,
neither direct recognition nor the excavations made in 2009
1
allow us to
find the remains of a skene. In the last century, the theatre area was sub-
jected to significant modification, which compromised its original mor-
phology. The archaeological trench opened at the edge of the orchestra did
not yield any evidence of structures that may refer to the proskenion men-
tioned in the inscription2. At approximately 2.5 m below ground level, in-
stead, a dry stone wall was found. Due to the closure of excavations, how-
ever, it was not possible to fully investigate (fig. 4). The remnants, which
are perpendicular to the cavea of the theatre, although they are minimally
included in the trench, do not seem to be connected with the theatre it-
self. Thanks to a few mixed ceramic fragments found in the same strata
as the stone structure, this situation seems datable to before the creation
of the theatre itself. This condition helps us understand how the ancient
plan underwent a gradual raising of roughly 2.50 m. As regards the scenic
1 Germani M. Il teatro di Cheronea: dal koilon rettilineo alla cavea semi circolare, in
M. Germani (acura di) Tra Oriente ed Occidente: miscellanea di studi sul mondo
antico, Aquino 2017.– PP. 48–62.
2 Germani M., 2017, op. cit. note 1. – P. 58.
Fig. 4. Chaironeia, excavations 2009, trench in the orchestra of the theatre
104 Marco Germani
structure, without precise archaeological data, we might suppose that the
theatre still lacked a skene in the third century BC and that the proskenion
referred to in the inscription was just a raised wooden structure. This still
occurred in many theatres between the late Classical age and the dawn of
the Hellenistic period, only when performances were held. The issue of the
koilon’s curvature still requires clarification. When was the rectilinear the-
atre of Chaeronea curved to align with the model of Hellenistic theatres?
According to Anti and Polacco, the curvature of the staircase was done in
two later phases, with about three centuries between them. The theatre
must have undergone an early rearrangement of the theatron just after the
Battle of Chaeronea in 338 BC. This intervention gave the koilon the cur-
vilinear style mentioned above, which scholars believe to be fundamen-
tal in indicating the small Boeotian town’s reception of the new model.
The definitive curvature, according to the two Italians, occurred after the
86 BC battle between Sulla and Archelaus1. In reality, the pseudo semi-
circular form adopted after the theatre of Chaeronea’s curvature does not
make any sense unless it is considered in light of the two embankments on
the sides of the koilon carved in the rock. The need to explain the various
katatomai in the theatre led the two Italians to identify two later actions of
curvature to the koilon, which now no longer seem probable2.
In the absence of concrete structures to underbuild and contain the two
side embankments at the edge of the flight of steps, no partial curvature
of the koilon could have guaranteed its alignment to the new standards set
by the theatron of the Epidaurus theatre. It seems clear, rather, that the
theatre of Chaeronea adopted its pseudo-circular shape only after the cre-
ation of the two side embankments. The hurried curvature created for the
koilon in the rock cannot be justified if not based on concrete structures
found to the north and south of the cavea, to expand the original koilon.
For this reason, Ibelieve it is more likely that the curvature of the koilon
1 Anti, Polacco 1969: C. Anti, L. Polacco, Nuove ricerche sui teatri greci arcaici,
Padova 1969.– PP. 43–44.
2 Other hypotheses on the transformation of the structure into an arena and on
the subsequent raising of the first steps of the cavea with respect to the orchestra
level also seem improbable. A test performed during 2009 excavations at the foot
of the staircase highlighted, a few cm from the level of the first step, the presence
of a rocky bank. This discovery suggests that the original orchestra level, removed
from the heavy excavation work completed in the 60s of the century before, must
have been located above this rock and could have been made up of a strong mixture
that concealed and levelled the natural roughness (holes) of the rocky bank.
Germani M. Il teatro di Cheronea: dal koilon rettilineo alla cavea semi circolare, in
M. Germani (acura di) Tra Oriente ed Occidente: miscellanea di studi sul mondo
antico, Aquino 2017.– PP. 48–62.
The Theatre of Chaeronea and Rectilinear Koila 105
influenced the structure only after the spread of opus caementicium in
Greece, which was widespread between the end of the first century BC and
the start of the following century1. Chaeronea’s archaeologically-attested
demographic boom in the Roman age, together with the construction ex
novo2 of public buildings3, seems to support the hypothesis that theatre
building was redefined in that period. It was thus the need to expand the
capacity of the old, smaller koilon that stimulated the redefinition of the
entire building towards the circular shape. Therefore, it seems that for
roughly four centuries, it continued to function with a rectilinear plan.
1 Such a late date for the reception of the new model shouldn’t surprise us.
Remember, for example, that in the small theatre of Argo, the rectilinear phase
of the mid-fifth century BC was cancelled out only with the construction of the
odeon built at the end of the first century AD and the start of the second. Nielsen I.
Cultic Theatres and Ritual Drama, Gylling, 2002. – PP. 101–106; Burmeister E.
Antike griechische und römische Theater, Darmstadt, 2006.– P. 129; Isler H.P. Argo,
in P. Ciancio Rossetto, G. Pisani Sartorio (acura di), Teatri greci e romani alle origini
del linguaggio rappresentato. Censimento analitico, Roma 1994.– P. 123.
2 Kahrstedt U. Das wirtschaftliche Gesicht Griechenlands in der Kaiserzeit:
Kleinstadt, Villa und Domäne, Bern, 1954.– PP. 108–109; ADelt., 51, 1996, Χρονικά,
PP.278–279; ADelt., 52, 1997, Χρονικά, p. 393; ADelt., 53, 1998, Χρονικά, p. 335;
Bonanno M. La scultura di età romana nella Beozia: importazioni e produzioni
locali, in Θ.Σ. Τιβερίου (ed.), Κλασική παράδοσηκαι νεωτερικά στοιχείαστην
πλαστικήτης ρωμαϊκής Ελλάδας, Thessaloniki 2012.– PP. 233–249.
3 The two public bath buildings identified by excavations in the Kaili and Tsirka
properties, in addition to the numerous remains of production villas, often
equipped with bath systems, seem to indicate a particularly flourishing period
for the city starting at the end of the first century BC. ADelt., 22, 1967, Χρονικά,
p.243; ADelt., 48, 1993, Χρονικά, pp. 181–182; Andriomenou A.K. s.v. Chaironeia,
in EAA, II suppl., vol. II, 1994.– PP. 116–117; Kountouri E. Ανασκαφικές εργασίες
στην Χαιρώνεια 2000–2002, Πρώτες εκτιμήσεις, in A. Mazarakis Ainian (ed.),
Αρχαιολογικό έργο Θεσσαλίας και Στερεάς Ελλάδας (1: 2003: Βόλος, Greece),
Βόλος 2006. – Р. 786; Harami A. The excavation of a Roman building in Chaeronea,
in M. Germani (ed) Tra Oriente ed Occidente: miscellanea di studi sul mondo
antico. Frosinone 2016.– PP. 21–35.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
Remains of a recently excavated small theatre at the foot of a fortified hill, identified with Aitolian Makyneia, were studied on the basis of electronic surveying, CAD, graphical and analytical approximation techniques. This theatre, of the 4th or 3rd century BC, partly excavated on the hillside and built of large sandstone slabs, has an unusual shape, with its koilon consisting of a curvilinear wing of 14 rows of seats and an adjacent linear wing of three rows of blocks forming a single-row proedria. Geometric modelling of the theatre remains on the basis of graphical, and especially of analytical techniques, indicates that the circular wing of the koilon consists of equidistant, concentric rows of seats based on a design arc of 90° for the 1st row, with the corresponding chord normal to the linear wing. Possible poor remains of a skene were found oblique (81°) to the linear wing.
Article
Si les entrees et les sorties des acteurs ont souvent ete analysees dans les travaux consacres a la production theâtrale athenienne du Ve et IVe siecles, on s'est en revanche peu preoccupe de savoir quelles etaient les possibilites d'acces au lieu scenique a partir de l'etude des vestiges des theâtres. Celle-ci montre que chœur et acteurs entraient tres generalement en scene lateralement, en empruntant, pour se rendre dans l'orchestra les parodos, pour se rendre sur le proskenion soit des rampes, soit des escaliers adosses a la skene. L'entree frontale sur l'estrade a travers le front de scene semble avoir ete peu frequente. Il etait cependant possible dans les theâtres de type hellenistique d'acceder du bâtiment de scene a l'orchestra par des portes menagees dans le front du proskenion et, dans certains edifices, par des passages souterrains.
Article
The theaters from the classical period found in Attica (at Thorikos, Ikarion, Euonymon and Rhamnus) and in the NE Peloponnesos (at Corinth, Argos and Isthmia) appear as a pattern for the reconstruction of the theater in the sanctuary of Dionysos Eleuthéreus at Athens. The koilon was pi-shaped, with branches wich were perhaps asymmetric and divergent. It included a prohedria in stone, in form of a simple step, and about forty-five wooden benches mounted on scaffolding. A stage-building of one story was erected for performances in front of the central section of the koilon. It had no second floor, but a terasse roof which was practicable during performances. Behind it stood a crane.
  • Adelt
ADelt., 52, 1997, Χρονικά, p. 393; ADelt., 53, 1998, Χρονικά, p. 335;
for the city starting at the end of the first century
for the city starting at the end of the first century BC. ADelt., 22, 1967, Χρονικά, p. 243; ADelt., 48, 1993, Χρονικά, pp. 181-182;
Βόλος 2006. -Р. 786; Harami A. The excavation of a Roman building in Chaeronea
  • E Kountouri
  • Ανασκαφικές
  • Στην Χαιρώνεια
Kountouri E. Ανασκαφικές εργασίες στην Χαιρώνεια 2000-2002, Πρώτες εκτιμήσεις, in A. Mazarakis Ainian (ed.), Αρχαιολογικό έργο Θεσσαλίας και Στερεάς Ελλάδας (1: 2003: Βόλος, Greece), Βόλος 2006. -Р. 786; Harami A. The excavation of a Roman building in Chaeronea, in M. Germani (ed) Tra Oriente ed Occidente: miscellanea di studi sul mondo antico. Frosinone 2016. -PP. 21-35.
The theatre at Isthmia, Chicago and London
  • E Gebhard
Gebhard E. The theatre at Isthmia, Chicago and London 1973. -PP. 9-26;
Das Theater in Eretria
  • E R Fiechter
Fiechter E.R. Das Theater in Eretria, Stuttgart 1937.
  • Kleinstadt
  • Villa Und Domäne
Kleinstadt, Villa und Domäne, Bern, 1954. -PP. 108-109; ADelt., 51, 1996, Χρονικά, PP. 278-279; ADelt., 52, 1997, Χρονικά, p. 393; ADelt., 53, 1998, Χρονικά, p. 335;